To President Trump! March 18, 2026 To reduce the Trump administration's "high tariffs" to "virtually zero" and eliminate the burden on American "businesses and consumers," it is necessary to establish "#balanced countervailing tariffs" in addition to "#Trump tariffs." Trump is making Americans pay tariffs on top of income tax and other taxes, even if it's to eliminate the trade deficit. This is called "#double taxation," and it's outrageous!
To President Trump!
March 18, 2026
To reduce the Trump administration's high tariffs to virtually zero and eliminate the burden on American businesses and consumers, we need to establish #balanced-countervailingduties in addition to the #TrumpTariffs.
Trump is forcing Americans to pay tariffs on top of income and other taxes, even though it's to eliminate the trade deficit. This is called #doubletaxation, and it's outrageous!
According to a report released by the #NewYorkFederalBank on February 12, Amer-ican #consumers and businesses are paying #90% of the tariffs Trump imposed on imports.
This #contradicts the Trump administration's claim that tariffs are "borne by #trad-ingpartners." I believe this is what's angering the #Americanpublic.
#Tariffs are a system that forces the American people to bear the burden. The #ChiefOfStaff who proposed this #lie should be fired.
To calm the anger of the American people, Trump should immediately enact my "balanced countervailing duties." This can be enacted by "#ExecutiveOrder."
The "balanced countervailing duties" system applies the "#TrumpTariffs" to "#ne-timports." Therefore, with the efforts of importers, the "#tariffs" can be reduced to "zero."
This transaction is similar to "#barter." Barter is a form of trade in which goods are directly exchanged for goods or services without direct monetary (foreign currency) settlement.
#Barter has been used in transactions with foreign currency-deficient countries, former communist countries, and developing countries. With Russia's exclusion from #SWIFT, "#barter trade" has been gaining attention.
Since this is not "#barter," I'm calling it "balanced countervailing duties." With the efforts of importers, the "#TrumpTariffs" can be reduced to "zero."
Importers like #Walmart can simply get exporters in China and elsewhere to import (purchase) American products in exchange for Chinese exports. This is possible giv-en America's purchasing power.
For example, Chinese exporters can import from #Walmart and sell in China. They can also profit from imports. Americans should be interested in exports.
I'm not opposed to the #TrumpTariffs. In fact, I welcome them. The higher the TrumpTariffs, the more effective the #TariffReductions will be.
The #WhiteHouse staff are so ignorant about #trade. When they introduced the #TrumpTariffs, they should have also introduced #BalancedCountervailingDuties.
Chinese and Japanese companies are accustomed to #bartering. They have #trad-ingsubsidiaries for this purpose. They offset #payments for exports of steel and other commodities with lumber and other commodities.
For the United States, "balanced countervailing duties" are an "export promotion measure." If you want to import at "zero tariffs," you should "export." We look for-ward to your questions. Go America!
Part 1 References
New York Fed Analysis: Americans Will Pay "Almost the Entire Cost" of Trump Tar-iffs
https://jp.reuters.com/markets/japan/PAB4JCJQHRIXFJYJU7TTO3NBXA-2026-02-12/
I'll write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)
Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".
"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!
First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.
❤Click below to read the full article!
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.
In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.
However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.
As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".
As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.
Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.
In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".
In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) were also arrested.
The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".
<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.
"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)
The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".
If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).
Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.
The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:
1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."
2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).
3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."
4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."
5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."
6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."
This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."
This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.
The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."
My argument:
"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.
"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.
The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."
However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.
The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.
Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.
Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.
Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.
Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.
Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."
NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.
Thank you.
Yasuhiro Nagano

Comments
Post a Comment