To President Trump 2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn. Part 2. I "suing" two things. This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government. We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place. If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.
To President Trump
2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn.
When he wrote a letter to French President McLon,
he said, "I will do everything I can for the former President Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.
Part 1. It is said that there is no "contact"
when trying to contact Mr. McLon's "close adviser" thereafter.
She claims that she has "not received support from France," and she appeals to McLon for help.
About Gone's former chairman.
The French Foreign Minister Rudorian met on the 5th with the Foreign Minister Taro Kono,
who attended the Foreign Ministerial Meeting of seven major countries (G7) held
in France on the 5th.
He told "Taro Kono, Foreign Minister" that "it is important that France respects the principle
of presumed innocence and that the Consulate General can properly protect its own people."
He also said, "France fully respects the independence and sovereignty of Japan's judiciary."
It clarified at the press conference after the G7 foreign ministers meeting on the 6th.
France can not protect its own people if it says,
"It completely respects Japan's judicial independence and sovereignty."
About the "presumed principle of innocence".
In a narrow sense,
it is a principle that indicates the location of burden of proof in a criminal trial,
and unless a prosecutor does "prove" a accused person's "guilty",
the accused person is given an "innocence".
(= The accused does not bear the responsibility to prove his innocence).
(Article 336 of Criminal Procedure Code).
In a broad sense (as a rule), it means that no one is treated as a criminal (has the right)
until a conviction is finalized.
(Another term may be used such as "the principle
of" assuming innocence "such as Article 14 paragraph 2
of the International Covenant on Human Rights B).
The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Convention B is ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support
other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro
My information ***************************************************
Zip code
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
2019-04-29:Dear Sirs, said Carol Gorn, wife of Carlos Gorn.
When he wrote a letter to French President McLon,
he said, "I will do everything I can for the former President Gone,"
but there is no "follow-up contact."
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.
Part 1. It is said that there is no "contact"
when trying to contact Mr. McLon's "close adviser" thereafter.
She claims that she has "not received support from France," and she appeals to McLon for help.
About Gone's former chairman.
The French Foreign Minister Rudorian met on the 5th with the Foreign Minister Taro Kono,
who attended the Foreign Ministerial Meeting of seven major countries (G7) held
in France on the 5th.
He told "Taro Kono, Foreign Minister" that "it is important that France respects the principle
of presumed innocence and that the Consulate General can properly protect its own people."
He also said, "France fully respects the independence and sovereignty of Japan's judiciary."
It clarified at the press conference after the G7 foreign ministers meeting on the 6th.
France can not protect its own people if it says,
"It completely respects Japan's judicial independence and sovereignty."
About the "presumed principle of innocence".
In a narrow sense,
it is a principle that indicates the location of burden of proof in a criminal trial,
and unless a prosecutor does "prove" a accused person's "guilty",
the accused person is given an "innocence".
(= The accused does not bear the responsibility to prove his innocence).
(Article 336 of Criminal Procedure Code).
In a broad sense (as a rule), it means that no one is treated as a criminal (has the right)
until a conviction is finalized.
(Another term may be used such as "the principle
of" assuming innocence "such as Article 14 paragraph 2
of the International Covenant on Human Rights B).
The French government should make a request based on the "International Human Rights Code B".
The International Human Rights Convention B is ratified by Japan.
France must not tolerate that countries ratified
by the "International Covenant on Human Rights B" do not comply with the treaty.
I will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
(a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the basis
of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60 and Article 62" Sins to support
other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Nagano Yoshihiro
My information ***************************************************
Zip code
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Mobile phone
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
Comments
Post a Comment