To the world media

I appeal for this every day. 1. Create a "special zone" in the world. Instead of developed countries "resetting" their economic stagnation with war, they can make "each other" happy by accepting "refugees and illegal immigrants" as "temporary immigrants" in a "special zone" isolated from the general public, and employing them as "low-wage workers". 2. Establish a "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA). A "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA)" will be established between the three countries of "the

To President Trump – October 18, 2026 "Do not overlook Japan’s duplicitous diplomacy: The ICC case is a dangerous precursor, and a restructuring of Japan’s judicial system is essential." "The U.S. responsibility for a stable international legal order: A recommendation for a cautious policy toward Japan, given its lack of the rule of law and the issues surrounding the ICC." [Prime Minister Takaichi’s diplomatic stance and the difficulty of removing the 'enemy state' clauses] The 'enemy state' clauses remain in the UN Charter because amending the Charter is virtually impossible. Prime Minister Takaichi’s insistence on their removal—despite the certainty of opposition from Russia and China—amounts to a form of duplicitous diplomacy that ignores the realities of the international community. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump

2026-10-18 [Proposal for Today] Prime Minister Takaichi's diplomacy of sanctioning Russia and intimidating China ignores the reality of deleting enemy state clauses. Since amending the UN Charter requires consensus among all permanent members, deletion is impossible due to opposition from China and Russia. If Japan, incapable of the rule of law, enters the permanent members, the world cannot predict what it will do. Americans must not forget Pearl Harbor, should view the ICC incident as Japan's prelude, and must rebuild Japan's judiciary. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1【Takaichi's Diplomatic Stance and Difficulty of Deleting Enemy State Clauses】Enemy state clauses are not deleted because amending the UN Charter is virtually impossible. While China's and Russia's opposition is certain, Prime Minister Takaichi's double-tongued diplomacy shouting for deletion ignores international realities. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

2【Strict Requirements for UN Charter Amendment and the Permanent Members' Barrier】Amending the UN Charter requires a two-thirds majority of member states and unanimous approval by all five permanent members (U.S., UK, France, China, Russia), and China and Russia, opposing Japan's growing influence, have no reason to agree. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3【A Desanctified Clause and Stalled UN Security Council Reforms】Since enemy state clauses are never actually used and their legal effectiveness is practically zero, their priority is low, and security council reform itself has stalled for decades due to the veto power. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4【Strategic Containment of Japan by China and Russia and Political Intentions】China and Russia aim to block Japan's bid for permanent membership and suppress its military and diplomatic voice; Prime Minister Takaichi's call for deletion is merely a political message posing questions to China and Russia. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5【Warning Against Japan's Bid for Permanent Membership Lacking the Rule of Law】As the ICC incident shows, allowing Japan—a country incapable of governing under the law—to join as a permanent member would lead to unpredictable actions, and the international community should not make Japan a primary member. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6【The Ideal of Article 9 vs. the Reality of a Major Military Power】While Japan de-clares the renunciation of war and maintenance of war potential under Article 9, it is actually one of the world's leading military powers, and the world must never recog-nize the permanent membership of such a deceitful Japan. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7【Memories of Pearl Harbor and the Dangerous Nature of the ICC Incident】Americans must not forget Pearl Harbor, should view the ICC incident as the prelimi-nary stage of Japan's declaration of war, and the U.S. should dismantle the ICC. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

8【Denouncing My Immigration Wrongful Conviction Case as the Ultimate Origin】To dismantle the ICC and stop Japan's runaway actions, we must seriously denounce my 2010 immigration law violation wrongful conviction case and rebuild Japan's judicial organs. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9【Rigorous Approach Toward Restoring Trust in International Legal Order】Ignoring double-tongued diplomacy in Japan's judiciary and foreign affairs will shatter trust in international legal order, making strict rule-of-law-based international cooperation indispensable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10【Global Solidarity to Prevent the Abuse of State Power】Condoning a structure where the state bends laws for convenience to infringe on rights leaves profound scars worldwide, requiring the international community to unite and prevent such abuses. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11【Structural Reforms to Build True Peace and Security】We strongly urge the world to reform military threats and arbitrary international agency operations through dras-tic structural reforms to build true peace and fair international security. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12【Establishing Judicial Independence to Protect Human Dignity】The establishment of an independent judiciary unfazed by power is the sole means to rescue all victims and protect human dignity from state arbitrary application. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13【Facing Past History and Making the Right Choice for the Future】Facing past his-tory and the distortions of current international politics, we must now choose the cor-rect international legal order to prevent humanity from repeating past mistakes. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

14【Powerful Warning to the International Community and Call for Urgent Response】We forcefully warn the international community of the dangers posed by Japan's dip-lomatic ambitions and structural flaws, demanding swift and concrete action. (Yasuhi-ro Nagano)

15【Toward Establishing the True Rule of Law and a Fair World Order】We strongly urge the international community to unite in rejecting arbitrary legal interpretations and detentions by state power, correcting the abnormalities of Japan's judicial culture, and establishing the true rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 References

[Prime Minister Takaichi to Demand "Urgent Deletion of Enemy State Clauses" in UN Speech, Intent to Appeal for Reform of UN Security Council]

https://www.sankei.com/article/20260923-JX3ZK4O7HRNEJF2JJQ5ZFPANPY/

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano

3. Sunday Edition (Dysfunction of Domestic Institutions and Global Recommendations - Chapters 7-8)

Part 2: Immigration Law Violation Cases, Sunday Edition

Chapter 7: When I was released from prison after completing my sentence, I read the newspaper and found out that a similar incident had occurred at the Philippine Embassy.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

Philippine diplomats, embassy staff, and Filipino drivers have suffered the same damage as me.

I have also filed a criminal accusation against this case.

I and the Chinese in the 2010 immigration law violation case, and the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomats in 2013, were punished for the same reason.

I have submitted my complaint and the complaints of the Chinese and Filipinos to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, and the Supreme Public Prosecutors Office.

However, all of them were rejected. If the prosecutor accepts and rejects the case, I can request the Prosecutor's Review Board to prosecute, but I have no way to oppose the rejection.

I also appealed to political parties and Diet members. But they were all ignored.

A city council member accompanied me to the Democratic Party's legal advisor. However, the advisor's answer was that if the "principal offense" is found guilty, then the "crime of aiding and abetting" is established. Is he really a lawyer?

The Democratic Party's legal advisor says that all those who graduated from the Legal Training and Research Institute have the same answer. This is proof that Japan is not "governed under the law".

I asked the Japan Bar Association for support. They said that the JFBA does not have the "power" to solve the problem. Japan's "judicial system" is crazy.

I have "emailed" "political parties and Diet members", as well as "the Prime Minister's Office and the Human Rights Bureau" on "Facebook and (X)", but they are still ignoring me.

This case is an arbitrary misapplication of the law by police officers, prosecutors, and judges. (It is an illegal act).

The charges are "Abuse of the authority of a special public official" and "Crimes of False Complaints".

In my "personal opinion," the prosecutors "concealed" the "criminal complaint" and "criminal accusation" by their "authority." Therefore, the "statute of limitations" has been suspended.

"Chapter 8." This case is "legally" an "error in the application of law."

"Errors in the application of law" are not subject to "requests for retrial" under the "Criminal Procedure Law."

However, if the "crime of the inspectors and police officers involved in the case" is "proven," a request for retrial can be made.

1. The charge against the "special public officials" in this case is "abuse of the authority of special public officials."

They "arrested" us even though there was "no suspicion of a crime." And they even "detained" us. (There is a precedent for grand jury decisions.)

2. And it is "the crime of false accusation." It is a fact that they "indicted" us and even found us guilty in a "trial" in order to make us criminals.

Requests for retrial can be made by us or by the prosecutors.

I believe that the prosecution should admit guilt and make a request for a retrial.

I will not give up. It has been 15 years since the incident.

The only country that can resolve this case is the United States.

When Trump was the former president, he promised me.

He replied with a signed letter saying, "I will resolve this in a way that satisfies you."

I hope that this time he will keep his promise.

President Trump, let's work together to "revive the Rust Belt" and create a "special zone on the Mexican border."

And let's cross the Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean in two hours with the "American Linear Canal Railway," a freight train dedicated to containers that will replenish the Panama Canal.

People around the world, please support us.

Part 3. Construction of a special zone. It's a new business model.

No2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

No1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Part 4. "US-Russia-China" three-nation military alliance and war show

No2: https://urc-military.seesaa.net/

No1: https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

Part 5. Ukraine War

No2: https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/

No1: https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

Part 6. Japan's infamous judicial system and human rights violations

No2: https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/

No1: https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

Part 7. Development of virus detectors for coronavirus and other viruses

https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

Part 8. North Korea's abduction and missile issues

https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

Part 9. One Coin Union & Hydrogen Vehicle Promotion

https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

Part 10. Nagano Opinion, Next Generation Nuclear Power Plant: CO2 Free & SDGs

https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

長野恭博　オピニオン 2026-10-18 「高市外交の危険な虚構を直視せよ――旧敵国条項削除を叫ぶ前に国際法の現実を理解せよ」「旧敵国条項削除の非現実性と日本外交の構造的欠陥――国連憲章改正の壁を見据えた政策転換を求める」* ロシア制裁や中国威嚇を行う高市首相の外交は敵国条項削除の現実を無視しており、国連憲章改正には常任理事国の全会一致が必要なため中露の反対で削除は不可能です。法による統治ができない日本が常任理事国入りすれば世界は何をするか分からず、アメリカ人はパールハーバーを忘れずICC事件を日本の前哨戦と捉え日本の司法を再構築すべきです。（長野恭博）

長野恭博　オピニオン

2026-10-18【今日の提案】ロシア制裁や中国威嚇を行う高市首相の外交は敵国条項削除の現実を無視しており、国連憲章改正には常任理事国の全会一致が必要なため中露の反対で削除は不可能です。法による統治ができない日本が常任理事国入りすれば世界は何をするか分からず、アメリカ人はパールハーバーを忘れずICC事件を日本の前哨戦と捉え日本の司法を再構築すべきです。（長野恭博）

1【高市首相の外交姿勢と旧敵国条項削除の困難さ】旧敵国条項が削除されないのは国連憲章の改正がほぼ不可能だからであり、ロシアや中国の反対が確実な中で削除を叫ぶ高市首相の二枚舌外交は国際社会の現実を無視しています。（長野恭博）

2【国連憲章改正の厳格な要件と常任理事国の壁】国連憲章の改正には加盟国3分の2の賛成と米英仏中露の常任理事国すべての賛成が必要であり、日本の影響力拡大を嫌う中国とロシアが賛成する理由は存在しません。（長野恭博）

3【死文化した条項と進まない国連安保理改革】旧敵国条項は実際に使われることがなく法的効力が事実上ゼロであるため優先度が低く、拒否権の存在により安保理改革そのものが数十年進んでいません。（長野恭博）

4【中露による戦略的な日本への牽制と政治的意図】中露は日本の常任理事国入りや軍事的発言力の抑制を狙っており、高市首相が削除を訴えるのは日本の誇りや中露への問題提起という政治的メッセージに過ぎません。（長野恭博）

5【法治が欠如した日本の常任理事国入りへの警鐘】ICC事件を見ても分かる通り法の下での統治ができない日本に常任理事国入りを許せば何をするか分からず、国際社会は日本を主要メンバーにするべきではありません。（長野恭博)

6【憲法9条の理想と世界有数の軍事大国という実態】日本は憲法9条で戦争放棄や戦力不保持を宣言しながら、実際には世界有数の軍事大国であり、世界はこの嘘つき日本の常任理事国入りを絶対に認めるべきではありません。（長野恭博）

7【パールハーバーの記憶とICC事件の危険な本質】アメリカ人はパールハーバーを忘れてはならず、ICC事件を日本の宣戦布告の前哨戦と捉え、アメリカはICCを解体するべきです。（長野恭博）

8【すべての原点である私の入管法冤罪事件の糾弾】ICCを解体し日本の暴走を止めるためには、2010年の私の入管法違反冤罪事件を真剣に糾弾して日本の司法機関を作り直さなければなりません。（長野恭博）

9【国際法秩序の信頼回復に向けた厳格なアプローチ】日本の司法や外交における二枚舌を放置すれば国際社会の法秩序の信頼は失墜するため、厳格な法治主義に基づく国際的連携が不可欠です。（長野恭博）

10【国家権力の暴走を阻止するためのグローバルな連帯】国家が法を都合良く曲げて権利を侵害する構造を容認すれば世界中に禍根を残すため、国際社会が一致団結してその暴走を阻止する必要があります。（長野恭博）

11【真の平和と安全保障を築くための構造的改革】軍事的脅威や恣意的な国際機関の運用を改め、真の平和と公平な国際安全保障を築くための抜本的な制度改革を世界に強く訴えます。（長野恭博）

12【個人の尊厳を守るための司法の独立の確立】権力に屈しない独立した司法の確立こそがすべての被害者を救済し、国家の恣意的運用から個人の尊厳を守る唯一の手段です。（長野恭博）

13【過去の歴史の直視と未来へ向けた正しい選択】過去の歴史と現在の国際政治の歪みを直視し、人類が過ちを繰り返さないために今こそ正しい国際法秩序を選択しなければなりません。（長野恭博）

14【国際社会に対する力強い警告と早急な対応の要請】日本の外交的野心と構造的欠陥がもたらす危険性について国際社会に力強く警告し、早急で具体的な対応の実行を求めます。（長野恭博）

15【真の法の支配と公正な世界秩序の確立に向けて】国家権力の恣意的な法解釈や拘束を一切許さず、国際社会が一体となって日本の司法文化の異常性を正し、真の法の支配を確立することを強く訴えます。（長野恭博）

パート1 参考文献

[高市首相、国連演説で「旧敵国条項の早急な削除」要求へ国連安保理の変革も訴える意向]

https://www.sankei.com/article/20260923-JX3ZK4O7HRNEJF2JJQ5ZFPANPY/

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本語）

3. 日曜版（国内機関の機能不全とグローバル提言・第7章〜第8章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【日曜版】

【第7章】国内の救済手続きにおける機能不全

刑期満了による釈放後、私は2013年にフィリピン大使館関係者が私と全く同じ構図の不当な摘発（入管法違反）に遭っていることを知りました。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

私はこの構造的冤罪を正すため、東京地方検察庁、東京高等検察庁、最高検察庁に対して「告訴状」および「告発状」を提出しました。しかし、検察はこれらをすべて「不受理」という形で門前払いしました。「不起訴」であれば検察審査会へ不服を申し立てる道がありますが、「不受理」にすることで、法的に対抗する手段すら奪われたのです。

また、政党や国会議員、弁護士会（日弁連）にもこの司法の歪みを訴えましたが、保身や知識不足からか、すべて無視または拒絶されました。大手政党の顧問弁護士ですら「正犯が有罪なら幇助も成立する」という思考停止の回答に終始し、日本の法秩序の崩壊を痛感せざるを得ませんでした。

検察・警察・裁判所によるこの一連の行為は、「特別公務員職権乱用罪」および「虚偽告訴罪」に該当する不法行為です。検察が職権でこれらの告訴・告発を隠蔽し続けているため、時効のカウントは停止していると解釈すべきです。

【第8章】再審請求への意志とアメリカへの期待

刑事訴訟法上、単なる「適用法の誤り」は再審請求の理由から除外されています。しかし、当時の捜査・裁判に関わった「公務員の犯罪」が立証されれば、再審の扉は開かれます。根拠なき不当逮捕（職権乱用）と、無実の者を罪人に仕立て上げた罪（虚偽告訴）を追及し、検察自らが非を認めて再審請求を行うべきです。事件から15年が経過しましたが、私は決して諦めません。

この日本の閉鎖的な司法システムを打破できる外部の力は、米国をおいて他にありません。トランプ氏は前大統領在任時、私に対し「満足のいく方法で解決する」との趣旨の署名入り返信をくれました。私はこの約束の実現を強く期待しています。

【トランプ大統領への共同提案】

ラストベルト（製造業地帯）の復活、およびメキシコ国境への「特別地帯」の建設を共に進めましょう。さらに、パナマ運河を補完するコンテナ専用の高速貨物鉄道「アメリカ・リニア運河鉄道」を敷設し、カリブ海から太平洋をわずか2時間で横断する新物流ルートを構築しましょう。

世界の皆様の、温かいご支援とご注目をお願いいたします。

第3部以降：各プロジェクトへのリンク

第3部：特別地帯の建設（新しいビジネスモデル）

No2：https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

No1：https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

第4部：「米ロ中」3国軍事同盟・戦争ショー

No2：https://urc-military.seesaa.net/

No1：https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

第5部：ウクライナ戦争

No2：https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/

No1：https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

第6部：悪名高い日本の司法制度・人権侵害

No2：https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/

No1：https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

第7部：コロナなどのウイルス感知器開発

https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

第8部：北朝鮮の拉致・ミサイル問題

https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

第9部：ワンコインユニオン＆水素自動車の推進

https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

第10部：次世代原発（CO2フリー）＆ SDGs

https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump: October 16, 2026 Do not, under any circumstances, tolerate the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) “overreach”; Article 34 is an absolute principle. Can the United States uphold its principles in the face of the ICC’s jurisdictional overreach? The President’s judgment is now being put to the test. [Article 34 of the Rome Statute and the Legacy of the Vienna Convention] The Rome Statute of the ICC also contains an “Article 34,” which upholds the fundamental principle that non-member states—such as the United States—are not bound by the ICC and that the Court cannot investigate U.S. citizens without consent. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump　

2026-10-17 [Proposal for Today] Everyone, stop pretending you know it all! To avoid being deceived by the "ICC and EU's ICC defense and criticism of Trump," you should know the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The Vienna Convention is a general treaty on treaty law, codifying customary inter-national law regarding treaties. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1[Professional and Legal Definition of Vienna Convention Article 34] Vienna Convention Article 34 stipulates that "a treaty does not create either obliga-tions or rights for a third State without its consent," binding only consenting countries and imposing no obligations on non-member states or their nationals, an essential principle often called the "constitution" of international law. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

2[ICC Rome Statute Article 34 and Succession of the Vienna Convention] The same Article 34 exists in the ICC Rome Statute with identical content, inheriting the principle that non-member states like the U.S. are not bound by the ICC and that the ICC cannot impose obligations on or investigate U.S. nationals without U.S. consent. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3[ICC's Deviation from the Principle and Logic of Non-Member Investigation] The ICC investigates nationals of non-member states based on crimes commit-ted in member state territories or declarations accepting investigations, which directly collides with Rome Statute Article 34. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4[U.S. Administration Changes and Responses to the ICC] The Trump admin-istration sanctioned ICC prosecutors and enacted entry bans, the Biden admin-istration showed some cooperation, and the current Trump administration has reinforced sanctions, demonstrating that the U.S. treats Article 34 as an abso-lute principle. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5[Tomoko Akane's Role and Export of Japanese Judicial Culture] It has been internationally pointed out that Akane, originating from the Japanese prosecu-tor corps, may have brought Japan's judicial culture (arbitrary interpretation and expansion of authority) into the ICC, reflecting her anti-Russian, anti-US, and anti-Israeli sentiments in her structural involvement across these cases. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6[Macron's Position and Untouched Legal Contradictions] Macron merely as-serts that the independence of the ICC should be protected, while avoiding the core issues of exercising jurisdiction over non-member states, the conflict with Vienna Convention Article 34, and confrontation with the U.S., evidently be-cause France wishes to maintain the ICC's political value without confronting the U.S. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7[Structural Relationship with My Immigration Law Wrongful Conviction Case] Prosecutors used immigration law Article 22-4 (administrative disposition) to expand prosecution into a "criminal penalty," refused provisional release de-spite claiming innocence, and imprisoned me until full term—a structure of ar-bitrarily expanding authority beyond legal limits that completely aligns with the ICC issue. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8[My Recognition as the Core of International Law] My assertion that "if Vienna Convention Article 34 is not 100% recognized, the rule of law collapses" repre-sents the scenario international law scholars fear most, while in reality, the ICC violates Article 34, the U.S. treats it as absolute, and Japan handles it arbitrari-ly. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9[A Connected Chain of Major Incidents] My case, the Ghosn case, the Akane case, and the ICC crisis are connected by a single line; the Japanese govern-ment defends the ICC by making the U.S. out to be the villain, but exposing my case reveals the path toward dismantling the ICC. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10[Courage Demanded of Trump, Who Loves Japan] It remains to be seen whether President Trump, who loves Japan, has the courage to dismantle the ICC by condemning my case. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11[Need to Reaffirm the Rule of Law in the International Community] Ignoring arbitrary applications and double-tongued diplomacy in international justice will completely destroy trust in the global legal order. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12[Escaping State Power to Protect Individual Rights] The state distorting laws to unjustly detain individuals must not be tolerated, and a drastic review is ur-gently needed to establish true human rights guarantees. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13[Activation of International Discussions on Legal Interpretation] It is neces-sary to deepen discussions for nations to discard political compromises and re-turn to strict rule of law regarding the interpretation of Vienna Convention Arti-cle 34. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14[Realization of World Peace and Fair International Justice] Restoring a fair international judicial system free from political agendas is the only path to safeguarding world peace and stability. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15[Strong Solidarity Toward Building a True International Legal Order] We strongly urge the international community to unite in resolutely rejecting the abuse of state power and arbitrary legal applications, correcting the abnormali-ties of Japan's judicial culture, and establishing the true rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 References

[Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_the_Law_of_Treaties

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano

2. Saturday Edition

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Saturday Edition]

For the case overview (Chapters 1 and 2), please refer to the Weekday Edition.

Throughout this unjust trial, I consistently maintained my innocence based on rigorous legal logic. However, the police and prosecution ignored my arguments, attempting to coerce a confession based on arbitrary generalizations.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 3] Appeals to the International Community and Legal Contradictions

Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan guarantees due process, stating that no person shall be deprived of life or liberty except according to procedure established by law (the principle of legality). Yet, the prosecution in this case forcefully misapplied administrative provisions to fit the Penal Code’s definition of aiding and abetting. This demonstrates a severe lack of legal competence and constitutes an abuse of official authority.

Following our case in 2010 and a nearly identical incident involving Philippine Embassy staff in 2013, international criticism intensified against Japan's arbitrary enforcement of the law.

Consequently, the Japanese government amended the Immigration Control Act in December 2016 (effective January 2017) to explicitly criminalize the act of "providing false employment contracts."

This statutory amendment is irrefutable proof that no such crime existed under the previous law when we were charged, meaning we were entirely innocent. Article 39 of the Constitution strictly prohibits retroactive punishment (ex post facto laws). Despite this clear legal reality, the government has offered no apology, restoration of honor, or compensation.

[Chapter 4] Supporting Legal Documents

The official indictment and the validity of my legal arguments are publicly accessible through the following documents (available in Japanese and English):

Official Indictment (JA/EN)

http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

My Legal Argument (Japanese)

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98

My Legal Argument (English)

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

[Chapter 5] Petitions to International Organizations

Following my release, I sought redress from foreign embassies in Japan, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and the International Criminal Court (ICC).

An ambassador from an African nation advised me that while diplomatic ties prevented an official state protest, they could engage networks within the ICC. I believe this international pressure ultimately forced the 2016 statutory amendment.

The number of foreign nationals—including Chinese, Korean, Filipino, and American citizens—who fall victim to such arbitrary legal interpretations in Japan is estimated to be in the tens or hundreds of thousands. This is an alarming crisis that the international community cannot ignore.

Continued in the Sunday Edition.

Part 3: Special Economic Zones (Business Model)

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

*Please refer to the "Sunday Edition" for Parts 4 through 10.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

長野恭博　オピニオン 2026年10月17日皆さん「知ったかぶり」は止めましょう！日本の首相へ──国際法の根幹「34条」を無視する国家は法治国家ではない総理、ICC擁護の前に“未加盟国に義務を課さない”34条を直視せよ皆さん「知ったかぶり」は止めましょう！ICCやEUの擁護に騙されないために、未加盟国に義務を課さないとするウィーン条約法条約34条を知るべきであり、34条を認めなければ法の支配が崩壊するという私の認識は国際法の根幹に関わる極めて重要な論点です。（長野恭博）

長野恭博　オピニオン

2026-10-17【今日の提案】皆さん「知ったかぶり」は止めましょう！ICCやEUの擁護に騙されないために、未加盟国に義務を課さないとするウィーン条約法条約34条を知るべきであり、34条を認めなければ法の支配が崩壊するという私の認識は国際法の根幹に関わる極めて重要な論点です。（長野恭博）

1【ウィーン条約34条の専門的・法学的定義】ウィーン条約法条約第34条は「条約は第三国に義務を課さない」と定め、同意した国だけを拘束し未加盟国やその国民には義務を課さない国際法の憲法と呼ばれるほど重要な原則です。（長野恭博）

2【ICCローマ規程第34条とウィーン条約の継承】ICCのローマ規程にも同じ第34条が存在し、米国などの未加盟国はICCに拘束されず、同意なく米国民を捜査できないという原則をそのまま継承しています。（長野恭博）

3【ICCによる原則の逸脱と未加盟国捜査の論理】ICCは加盟国領域での犯罪や受入宣言を根拠に未加盟国の国民を捜査対象としており、これはローマ規程第34条と正面から衝突しています。（長野恭博）

4【米国の政権交代によるICCへの対応の変化】トランプ政権はICC検察官の制裁や入国禁止を実施し、バイデン政権時は協力姿勢を見せたものの再び制裁を強化するなど、米国は34条を絶対原則として扱っています。（長野恭博）

5【赤根智子氏の役割と日本的司法文化の輸出】赤根氏は日本検察出身であり、プーチン氏や米兵、イスラエル首相の案件に構造的に関与しています。米国が赤根氏を制裁した理由は管轄権の乱用であり、私の事件での恣意的解釈と同じ構造です。（長野恭博）

6【マクロンの立場と触れられない法的矛盾】マクロンはICCの独立性を守るべきと主張するものの、米国と対立したくないため未加盟国への管轄権行使という34条の法的矛盾という核心には触れていません。（長野恭博）

7【私の入管法冤罪事件との完全な構造的一致】入管法22条4項の行政処分を刑事罰に拡張して起訴し仮釈放を拒否した私の冤罪事件は、本来の法の枠を逸脱して権限を恣意的に拡張する構造でありICCの問題と完全に一致しています。（長野恭博）

8【私の認識が示す国際法の核心と崩壊の危機】34条を100%認めなければ法の支配が崩壊するという私の認識は国際法学者の最も恐れる事態であり、現実にはICCはそれを破り、日本は恣意的に扱っています。（長野恭博）

9【一本の線でつながる一連の重大事件の構図】私の事件、ゴーン事件、赤根事件、ICCの危機は一本の線でつながっており、日本政府は米国を悪者にしてICCを擁護しています。（長野恭博）

10【日本を愛するトランプ氏に求められる勇気】私の事件を糾弾すればICCの解体も見えてきますが、日本を愛するトランプ氏にICCを解体する勇気があるかは見ものです。（長野恭博）

11【国際社会における法の支配の再確認の必要性】国際司法の場における恣意的な運用や二枚舌の外交を放置すれば、グローバルな法秩序の信頼は完全に失墜します。（長野恭博）

12【個人の権利を守るための国家権力からの脱却】国家が法を歪めて個人を不当に拘束する行為は許されるべきではなく、真の人権保障を確立するための抜本的な見直しが急務です。（長野恭博）

13【法解釈の正当性を巡る国際的な議論の活性化】ウィーン条約34条の解釈を巡り、各国が政治的妥協を排して厳格な法治主義に立ち返るための議論を深める必要があります。（長野恭博）

14【世界平和と公正な国際司法の実現に向けて】政治的思惑にとらわれない公正な国際司法制度を取り戻すことが、世界の平和と安定を守る唯一の道です。（長野恭博）

15【真の国際法秩序構築へ向けた強固な連帯】国家権力の暴走と恣意的な法の運用を断固として拒絶し、真の法の支配と公正な国際法秩序の構築に向けて世界中が連帯することを強く訴えます。（長野恭博）

Part 1 参考文献

[条約法に関するウィーン条約]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_the_Law_of_Treaties

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本語）

2. 土曜版（国際社会への提訴と法改正の矛盾・第3章〜第5章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【土曜版】

※第1章・第2章の事件概要は「平日版」をご覧ください。

私は自身の受けた不当な裁判について、一貫して法的な論理に基づいて無罪を主張してきましたが、警察・検察はそれを無視し、強引に罪を認めさせようとしました。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第3章】国際社会への告発と法改正の事実

日本国憲法第31条は、適正な法律の定める手続きによらなければ刑罰を科せられない（罪刑法定主義）と定めています。しかし、本件で検察が用いた論理は、行政処分である入管法の規定を、刑法の幇助罪へと強引に結びつけたものであり、法的な専門知識を著しく欠いた職権乱用と言わざるを得ません。

実際、私どもの事件（2010年）や、その後のフィリピン大使館関係者の事件（2013年）に対し、国際社会から日本の不当な法運用への批判が高まりました。

その結果、日本政府は2016年12月に入管法を改正（2017年1月施行）し、ようやく「虚偽の雇用契約書を提供する行為」を処罰できる明確な規定を作りました。

この法改正こそが、「それ以前の法律では処罰できなかった（＝私たちは無罪であった）」ことの動かぬ証拠です。憲法第39条は法律の遡及処罰（過去に遡って罪に問うこと）を禁止しています。それにもかかわらず、政府からの謝罪や名誉回復、賠償はいまだに行われていません。

【第4章】証拠資料一式

当時の起訴状や私の主張の正当性は、以下の公開資料（日本語・英語）から客観的にご確認いただけます。

起訴状（日・英）

http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

私の主張（日本語）

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98

私の主張（英語）

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

【第5章】国際機関へのアプローチ

釈放後、私は在日外国大使館や国連人権高等弁務官事務所（OHCHR）、国際刑事裁判所（ICC）へ救済を求めました。

あるアフリカ諸国の大使からは、「政府間の援助関係から表立った抗議は難しいが、ICCのネットワークを通じて動くことはできる」との合理的な助言も得ました。こうした国際的な圧力が、2016年の入管法改正に繋がったと考えています。

日本国内でこのような恣意的な法解釈の犠牲になっている外国人は、中国人、韓国人、フィリピン人、アメリカ人など、数万人から数十万人に上る可能性があります。これは看過できない異常な事態です。

※続きは「日曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特別地帯の建設（ビジネスモデル）

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※第4部〜第10部は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump – October 16, 2026 [A Crisis on the Eve of a Second "Pearl Harbor" by the Japanese Government] Prime Minister Takaichi’s "double-tongued" diplomacy—characterized by her clamoring that Japan remains subject to the "enemy state" clauses—is intensifying. Americans have become like canaries that have forgotten the rallying cry, "Remember Pearl Harbor." Unless the U.S. regains its patriotism, Japan will continue its attacks, weaponizing the International Criminal Court (ICC) to target the United States. (Yasuhiro Nagano) [The Clash Between International Politics and Law Regarding ICC Arrest Warrants] The issue surrounding ICC arrest warrants represents a collision between the privileges and immunities enshrined in Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and the jurisdictional scope of the Rome Statute. As nations selectively invoke these provisions to suit their own political agendas, we are witnessing the collapse of the "rule of law"—a point I have long highlighted—and the emergence of arbitrary legal application at the level of international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump!

2026-10-16 [Proposal for Today] The origin of President Trump is right here! In March 2020, the ICC's decision to reverse its stance and investigate suspicions of war crimes by U.S. soldiers in the Afghanistan war enraged the U.S. This judicial runaway ignoring jurisdiction outside non-member states is completely consistent with the structure of arbitrary legal interpretation continuing from my immigration law wrong-ful conviction case. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1【The Crisis on the Eve of the Japanese Government's "Second Pearl Harbor"】Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's double-tongued diplomacy is intensifying as she shouts that Japan is currently under the enemy state clauses. Many Americans are like canaries who have forgotten "Remember the Pearl Harbor," and unless they re-gain patriotism, Japan's attacks utilizing the ICC will continue. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2【Systematic Organization of the Flow of International Legal Structures】Before re-ceiving the next attack, let us systematically organize the ICC arrest warrants, U.S. administration responses, Tomoko Akane's role, Vienna Convention Article 34, and Macron's position as a single international legal structure. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3【Collision Between International Politics and Law Surrounding ICC Warrants】The ICC arrest warrant issue is a collision between the privilege and immunity under Vi-enna Convention Article 34 and Rome Statute jurisdiction. As countries use this to suit political convenience, the collapse of the rule of law and arbitrary application that I point out are occurring at the international judicial level. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4【ICC Warrant Flow and Issuance for Putin】1. The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Putin in March 2023, but Russia is a non-member, making its practical effectiveness almost zero. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5【U.S. Military Incident and Severe U.S. Sanctions】2. When the ICC attempted to investigate U.S. war crime suspicions in the Afghanistan war, non-member U.S. completely denied jurisdiction, and the Trump administration imposed sanctions such as entry bans and asset freezes on the ICC prosecutor. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6【Israeli Prime Minister Warrant and Political Attitude Shifts】3. When the ICC is-sued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu during the Gaza war, the U.S. fully supported Israel and intensified sanctions. This political dominance where attitudes shift 180 degrees by administration is pointed out. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7【Political Influence of U.S. Administration Changes on the Judiciary】The structure where the Trump administration sanctions the ICC, the Biden administration shows cooperation, and Trump sanctions again is political rule where the judiciary is subject to political influence. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8【Tomoko Akane's Role and Export of Japanese Prosecutor Culture】4. Akane origi-nates from the Japanese prosecutor corps and is structurally involved in each case. The reason the U.S. sanctioned Akane is jurisdiction abuse, and the arbitrary illegal interpretation by prosecutors in my case is being reproduced in international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9【Vienna Convention Article 34 and Immunities of International Organizations】5. Vienna Convention Article 34 stipulates privileges and immunities for international organization officials, but the U.S. sanctioned Akane for exercising authority over non-member states. Unless Article 34 is strictly recognized, the weight of interna-tional treaties collapses. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10【Macron's Position and Ambiguity Without Touching the Core】6. While Macron protects ICC independence and respects warrants, he avoids touching the core issue of exercising jurisdiction over non-member states. This stems from France's calcula-tion not to confront the U.S. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11【My Internationally Correct Claims and Common Structures】7. My immigration case, the Ghosn case, and the Akane case share common structures: jurisdiction ex-pansion, independent legal interpretation, political intervention, punishment of dis-senters, and disregard for international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12【The Importance of My Wrongful Conviction Case as the Ultimate Origin】8. My immigration law wrongful conviction case is the earliest concrete example and abso-lute origin of this entire chain. Unless my case is resolved, the ICC case will not end. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13【Limits of Japanese Legal Consciousness and Responsibility of the International Community】Japan is a country where people fail to understand international law or the constitution, making my case a major global problem beyond a personal matter. Early resolution by the international community is indispensable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14【Execution of Structural Reforms to Restore International Trust】Leaving the structural contradictions of Japan's judicial system unaddressed will shatter trust in international legal order. We demand drastic reforms to relieve global victims and re-alize the true rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15【Solidarity to Establish the True Rule of Law】To prevent arbitrary legal interpre-tation and detention by state power, we strongly urge the international community to unite, correct the abnormalities of Japan's judicial culture, and establish the true rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

[Afgan war crimes investigation: ICC reverses decision, U.S. reacts]

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/51764050

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.

Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

高市早苗内閣総理大臣 2026年10月16日トランプ氏の原点がここにあります。2020年3月にICCがアフガニスタン戦争の米兵の戦争犯罪疑惑の捜査判断へ一転したことは米国を激怒させました。未加盟国の管轄権外を無視した司法の暴走は、私の入管法違反冤罪事件から続く恣意的法解釈の構造と完全に一致しています。（長野恭博）【日本政府の第2真珠湾攻撃前夜の危機】日本が敵国条項にあると喚く高市首相の二枚舌外交は激しさを増しています。米国人は「Remember the Pearl Harbor」を忘れたカナリアのようであり、愛国心を取り戻さなければ日本のICCを利用した攻撃は続きます。（長野恭博）

高市早苗内閣総理大臣

2026-10-16【今日の提案】トランプ氏の原点がここにあります。2020年3月にICCがアフガニスタン戦争の米兵の戦争犯罪疑惑の捜査判断へ一転したことは米国を激怒させました。未加盟国の管轄権外を無視した司法の暴走は、私の入管法違反冤罪事件から続く恣意的法解釈の構造と完全に一致しています。（長野恭博）

1【日本政府の第2真珠湾攻撃前夜の危機】日本が敵国条項にあると喚く高市首相の二枚舌外交は激しさを増しています。米国人は「Remember the Pearl Harbor」を忘れたカナリアのようであり、愛国心を取り戻さなければ日本のICCを利用した攻撃は続きます。（長野恭博）

2【国際法構造の連続性と一連の流れの整理】次の攻撃を受ける前に、ICC逮捕状や米政権の対応、赤根智子氏の役割、ウィーン条約34条、マクロンの立場を一つの国際法構造として体系的に整理します。（長野恭博）

3【ICC逮捕状をめぐる国際政治と法の衝突】ICC逮捕状問題は、ウィーン条約34条の特権免除とローマ規程の管轄権の衝突であり、各国が政治的都合で使い分ける結果、私が指摘する法の支配の崩壊と恣意的運用が国際司法レベルで起きています。（長野恭博）

4【ICCの逮捕状の流れとプーチン氏への発行】1.ICCは2023年3月にプーチン氏へ逮捕状を発行しましたが、ロシアは未加盟のため実効性はほぼゼロです。（長野恭博）

5【米兵事件における米国の激しい反発と制裁】2.ICCがアフガニスタン戦争での米兵の戦争犯罪疑惑を捜査しようとした際、未加盟の米国は管轄権を完全否定し、トランプ政権はICC検察官への入国禁止や資産凍結の制裁を実施しました。（長野恭博）

6【イスラエル首相逮捕状と政治による態度の変化】3.ICCがガザ戦争でイスラエル首相ネタニヤフ氏に逮捕状を発行すると、米国は全面支援し制裁を強化しました。このように政権で態度が180度変わる政治支配が指摘されています。（長野恭博）

7【米国の政権交代による司法の政治的影響】トランプ政権がICCを制裁し、バイデン政権が協力姿勢を見せ、再びトランプ政権が制裁する構造は、司法が政治的影響を受ける政治支配そのものです。（長野恭博）

8【赤根智子氏と日本検察の司法文化の輸出】4.赤根氏は日本検察出身であり、各案件に構造的に関与しています。米国が赤根氏を制裁した理由は管轄権の乱用であり、私の事件での検察の恣意的違法解釈が国際司法で再現されています。（長野恭博）

9【ウィーン条約34条と国際機関の特権免除】5.ウィーン条約34条は国際機関職員の特権免除を定めていますが、未加盟国への権限行使に対して米国は赤根氏を制裁しました。34条を厳格に認めなければ国際条約の重みが崩壊します。（長野恭博）

10【マクロンの立場と核心に触れない曖昧さ】6.マクロンはICCの独立性を守り逮捕状を尊重する一方、未加盟国への管轄権行使という核心には触れていません。これは米国と対立したくないフランスの思惑によるものです。（長野恭博）

11【国際法的に正しい私の主張と一連の共通構造】7.私の入管法事件、ゴーン事件、赤根事件は、管轄権拡張、法の独自解釈、政治介入、反論者懲罰、国際法軽視という共通構造を持っています。（長野恭博）

12【すべての原点である私の冤罪事件の重要性】8.私の入管法違反の冤罪事件は、これら一連の構造の最初期の具体例でありすべての原点です。私の事件を解決しなければICC事件は終わらないのです。（長野恭博）

13【日本人の法意識の限界と国際社会の責任】日本人は国際法や憲法が理解できない国であり、私の事件は個人の問題を超えた世界的な重大問題です。国際社会による早期の解決が不可欠です。（長野恭博）

14【国際的信頼回復のための構造的改革の断行】日本の司法制度が孕む構造的矛盾を放置すれば、国際社会の法秩序への信頼は失墜します。世界中の被害者救済と真の法の支配を実現するため抜本的な改革を求めます。（長野恭博）

15【真の法の支配の確立に向けた強固な連帯】国家権力による恣意的な法解釈や拘束を許さないため、国際社会が一体となって日本の司法文化の異常性を正し、真の法の支配を確立することを強く訴えます。（長野恭博）

パート1 関係URL

[アフガン戦争犯罪を捜査へ ICCが判断を一転、米国は反発]

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/51764050

明日また書きます。

長野恭博

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

日本の司法制度および入管行政には、国際社会の基準から見ても極めて重大な人権侵害の疑いがあります。私は自身の経験を通じて、日本の「法治国家」としてのあり方に強い疑問を投げかけます。

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋：私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末：リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2009年：経営環境の悪化により、やむを得ず該当の中国人学生の雇用を取り消しました。そのため、彼らは卒業後も学生時代からのアルバイト（飲食店）を継続せざるを得なくなりました。

2010年5月：この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月：私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理：検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

当時の入管法第22条の4第4号の規定では、虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を得た場合、法務大臣は「行政処分」としてその資格を取り消すことができると定めているに過ぎません。つまり、虚偽書類の提出そのものは、刑罰の対象となる「犯罪」とは規定されていません。犯罪ではない行為を「幇助」したという理屈は、法的に成立しません。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同：入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

正犯なき幇助の矛盾：彼らが働いていた飲食店の雇用主は、入管法第73条の2（不法就労助長罪）で処罰されていません。正犯（実際の雇用主）が処罰されていない以上、法の下の平等の原則に照らし、私たちが処罰されるのは法理的に異常です。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

先進国にとっては低賃金労働力の確保による経済成長、移民にとっては衣食住・医療・教育が無料で保障された人間らしい生活の場となります。双方にメリットのある現実的な解決策です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗内閣総理大臣 2026年10月15日日本の司法暴走を直視せよ──ICC管轄権逸脱の構造は日本の冤罪と同一だ ICCの管轄権逸脱が示す国際司法の危機──日本の冤罪構造と重なる深刻な連続性トランプ氏の原点がここにあります。2020年3月にICCがアフガニスタン戦争の米兵の戦争犯罪疑惑の捜査判断へ一転したことは米国を激怒させました。未加盟国の管轄権外を無視した司法の暴走は、私の入管法違反冤罪事件から続く恣意的法解釈の構造と完全に一致しています。（長野恭博）

高市早苗内閣総理大臣

パート1 関係URL

[アフガン戦争犯罪を捜査へ ICCが判断を一転、米国は反発]

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/51764050

明日また書きます。

長野恭博

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋：私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末：リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2010年5月：この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月：私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理：検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同：入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump! October 15, 2026 The United States must not turn a blind eye to Japan's ``deviation from international justice'' The influx of Japanese judicial culture into the ICC is a serious threat to the international legal order, and the United States should take the lead in correcting it. [Structural continuity of the three major incidents] Everyone around the world! My case of false accusation of violating immigration law is the same as the Ghosn case and the ICC Akane case. These are not separate incidents, but a continuous phenomenon of arbitrary legal interpretation and restraint by the authorities. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump!

2026-10-15 [Proposal for Today] An accusatory document exposing the common structure of "arbitrary legal interpretation and detention by authority" linking the 2010 immigration law violation wrongful conviction case to the Carlos Ghosn case and the ICC Akane case, strongly urging the reality that Japan's judicial culture was exported to international justice and demanding an early resolution by the interna-tional community. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1【Structural Continuity of the Three Major Cases】Everyone in the world! My immi-gration law violation wrongful conviction case is identical to the Carlos Ghosn case and the ICC Akane case. These are not separate incidents, but a single continuous phenomenon of arbitrary legal interpretation and detention by authority. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2【Japanese Conformity Pressure and International Responsibility】This stream of events symbolizes the Japanese character. "If everyone crosses on a red light, there's nothing to be afraid of." Even if illegal, if everyone covers for each other, evil be-comes good. The international community should teach Japan justice. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

3【Systematic Organization of the Sequential Flow】The recognition that "everything is connected" is extremely accurate from the perspective of international law and po-litical structures. Below, I systematically organize the common flow centering on my perspective. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4【Arbitrary Detention in My Case】1. My case involved the prosecution criminally interpreting an administrative disposition. Refusing parole for asserting innocence and imprisoning until full term constitutes arbitrary detention and a violation of the princi-ple of legality under international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5【Japanese Judiciary Exposed in the Ghosn Case】2. The Nissan Carlos Ghosn case visualized Japan's judicial structure to the world. Hostage justice with repeated re-arrests and arbitrary expansion of aggravated breach of trust has drawn severe inter-national criticism as "prosecutorial rule." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6【U.S. Political Influence in the Ghosn Case】The father and son who helped Ghosn escape were released under the Biden administration, while the American CFO was arrested under the Trump administration. Treatment changing by administration shows political influence, sharing the exact structure as the ICC Akane case. (Yasuhi-ro Nagano)

7【The ICC Akane case and Export of Judicial Culture】3. Investigating nationals of non-member states in the ICC Akane case is a jurisdictional deviation. Akane origi-nates from the Japanese prosecutor corps, bringing Japanese judicial culture of ex-panded authority and independent interpretation into the ICC. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8【U.S. Sanctions and Independent Interpretation of the Vienna Convention】The U.S. sanctioned her as a deviation from the rule of law. Akane justifies this via inde-pendent interpretation of Vienna Convention Article 34. Punishing dissenters and ex-panding authority are the core of Japan's judicial culture. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9【Common Point 1: Deviation of Authority and Jurisdiction Expansion】4. Common Point 1 is the deviation of authority: criminalizing administrative dispositions in my case, expanding detention requirements in the Ghosn case, and expanding ICC juris-diction to non-member states in the Akane case. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10【Common Point 2: Independent Interpretation and Arbitrary Application】Common Point 2 is independent legal interpretation and arbitrary application: con-structing a non-existent crime in my case, abusing re-arrests in the Ghosn case, and independently interpreting Vienna Convention Article 34 in the Akane case. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11【Common Points 3, 4, and 5: Political Dynamics, Punishment of Dissenters, and Disregard for International Law】Common Points 3, 4, and 5 consistently appear as political influence, the punishment of dissenters, and the disregard for international law such as the ICCPR and international criminal law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12【Historical Trajectory of Japanese Judicial Culture】5. The sequential flow: Japa-nese judicial culture existed in my 2010 case, was exposed to the world in the 2018 Ghosn case, and was exported to international bodies in the 2024 ICC Akane case, conflicting with the U.S. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13【Historical Significance of My Case as the Starting Point】The flow of wrongful conviction in my immigration law violation case was positioned as the starting point for the ICC Akane case, holding historical significance as the earliest demonstration of Japan's structural judicial problems. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14【Limitations of Japanese Legal Consciousness and International Resolution】Japan is a country where people cannot understand international law or the constitution. My case is a major global problem, and an early resolution by the international commu-nity is essential. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15【Demanding Radical Reforms of Judicial Structures】Leaving the structural con-tradictions of Japan's judiciary unaddressed will collapse trust in the international le-gal order. To relieve victims worldwide and realize true rule of law, we strongly de-mand radical reforms. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

[Carlos Ghosn case]

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_Carlos_Ghosn

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗内閣総理大臣 2026年10月15日日本の司法が国際秩序を揺るがす「恣意的拘束の連鎖」を直視せよ日本的司法文化が国際司法へ波及した構造的危機を政府は正面から認識すべきである 2010年の入管法違反冤罪事件を起点にゴーン事件、ICC赤根氏事件へと連なる「権力の恣意的法解釈と拘束」の共通構造を暴き、日本の司法文化が国際司法に輸出された現実と国際社会による早期解決を強く訴える告発文書です。（長野恭博）

高市早苗内閣総理大臣

2026年10月15日【今日の提案】2010年の入管法違反冤罪事件を起点にゴーン事件、ICC赤根氏事件へと連なる「権力の恣意的法解釈と拘束」の共通構造を暴き、日本の司法文化が国際司法に輸出された現実と国際社会による早期解決を強く訴える告発文書です。（長野恭博）

1【3大事件の構造的連続性】世界の皆さん！私の入管法違反冤罪事件はゴーン事件やICC赤根氏事件と同じです。これらは別々の事件ではなく、権力による恣意的な法解釈と拘束という一つの連続現象です。（長野恭博）

2【日本的同調圧力と国際社会の責任】この事件の流れは日本人の性格を象徴しています。「赤信号、皆で渡れば怖くない」の通り、違法でも庇いあえば悪は善になります。国際社会は日本に正義を教えるべきです。（長野恭博）

3【一連の流れの体系的整理】「全部つながっている」という認識は国際法や政治構造の観点からも正確です。以下、私の視点を中心に共通の流れを体系的に整理します。（長野恭博）

4【私の事件における恣意的拘禁】1.私の事件は、行政処分を検察が独自解釈で刑事犯化しました。冤罪主張を理由に仮釈放を拒否して満期収監したもので、国際法上の恣意的拘禁と罪刑法定主義の侵害にあたります。（長野恭博）

5【ゴーン事件で露呈した日本型司法】2.日産ゴーン事件は日本の司法構造を世界に可視化しました。再逮捕を繰り返す人質司法や特別背任要件の恣意的拡張により、海外から「検察支配」と厳しく批判されています。（長野恭博）

6【ゴーン事件における米国の政権影響】ゴーン逃亡の親子はバイデン政権で釈放された一方、米国人CFOはトランプ政権で逮捕されました。米国でも政権で扱いが変わる政治的影響はICC赤根氏事件と同じ構造です。（長野恭博）

7【ICC赤根氏事件と司法文化の輸出】3.ICC赤根氏事件では未加盟国の国民捜査は管轄権逸脱です。赤根氏は日本検察出身であり、権限拡張や独自解釈という日本の司法文化を国際司法に持ち込んだと指摘できます。（長野恭博）

8【米国制裁とウィーン条約の独自解釈】米国は法の支配の逸脱として赤根氏を制裁しました。赤根氏はウィーン条約34条を独自解釈して正当化していますが、反論者への懲罰や権限拡張は日本的司法文化の核心です。（長野恭博）

9【共通点①：権限の逸脱と管轄権拡張】4.共通点①は権限の逸脱です。私の事件では行政処分の刑事処罰化、ゴーン事件では勾留要件の拡張、赤根事件ではICC管轄権の未加盟国への拡張として現れています。（長野恭博）

10【共通点②：法の独自解釈と恣意運用】共通点②は法の独自解釈と恣意的運用です。私の事件では成立しない犯罪の構成、ゴーン事件では再逮捕の乱用、赤根事件ではウィーン条約34条の独自解釈が行われました。（長野恭博）

11【共通点③④⑤：政治力学・懲罰・国際法軽視】共通点③④⑤は、政治権力の影響、反論者への懲罰、そしてICCPRや国際人権法・刑事法からの国際法軽視として共通して見られます。（長野恭博）

12【日本的司法文化が辿った歴史的軌跡】5.2010年の私の事件で存在した日本的司法文化が、2018年のゴーン事件で世界に露呈し、2024年のICC赤根氏事件で国際機関に輸出されて米国と衝突した、これが一連の流れの本質です。（長野恭博）

13【私の事件が持つ歴史的意味】私の入管法違反冤罪事件の流れは、ICC赤根氏事件の起点に位置しています。日本の司法の恣意性と国際法軽視という構造を最も早期に示したケースとして歴史的意味を持ちます。（長野恭博）

14【日本人の法意識の限界と国際的解決】日本人は国際法や憲法が理解できない国です。私の事件は個人の問題ではなく世界の大きな問題であり、国際社会による早期の解決が不可欠です。（長野恭博）

15【司法構造の抜本的改革の断行】日本の司法制度全体が孕む構造的矛盾を放置すれば国際社会の信頼は失墜します。世界中の被害者救済と真の法の支配実現のため、日本政府と国際社会の抜本的改革を求めます。（長野恭博）

パート1

カルロス・ゴーン事件 / Affaire Carlos Ghosn

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_Carlos_Ghosn

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本人）

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋：私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末：リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2010年5月：この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月：私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理：検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同：入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump – October 14, 2026 The United States must squarely confront the issue of international judicial bodies overstepping their jurisdiction and strongly urge a halt to the ICC’s political runaway actions! Presenting the issues of the ICC’s encroachment on sovereignty and Japan’s system of arbitrary detention to the U.S., and arguing for the necessity of international judicial reform. [Structural Commonalities and State Overreach Across Four Major Cases] My case from June 2010 (in which a violation of Article 22-4, Paragraph 4 of the Immigration Control Act was treated as a criminal matter) shares structural commonalities with the "Wishma Case," the "Ghosn Case," and the "ICC Judge Akane Case." The world must ensure that Japan becomes a nation truly governed by the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump!

2026-10-14 [Proposal for Today] A denunciation document exposing the structural homogeneity of "jurisdictional deviation of authority," "arbitrary detention," and "po-liticization of justice" common to the Wishma case, the Ghosn case, and the ICC Akane case, starting from the 2010 Immigration Control Act wrongful conviction case, and demanding fundamental reforms of the Japanese government and international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

1【Structural Commonalities and State Jurisdictional Deviations Spanning Four Major Cases】My case from June 2010 shares structural commonalities with the "Wishma case," the "Ghosn case," and the "ICC Akane case." The world should make Japan a nation governed under the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

2【The Necessity of Systematically Organizing Common Threads Across Three Major Cases】In these three cases, authorities have deviated from their original jurisdiction. Centered on my case, we must systematically organize the commonalities; otherwise, neither the ICC case nor my case can be resolved. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

3【The Reality of Arbitrary Detention Deviating from Original Jurisdiction】Originally, the charge in my case was an administrative disposition. An administrative disposi-tion does not constitute aiding and abetting under the Penal Code. Despite this, the prosecution indicted me. This is a clear deviation of jurisdiction (Arbitrary Detention). (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

4【Arbitrary Detention via Immigration Discretion in the Wishma Case】The Wishma case involved a domestic violence victim placed in detention rather than protection, who died while denied medical care. This constitutes unpermissible arbitrary deten-tion based on immigration discretion. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

5【The Ghosn Case and Japan's Host Justice Structure in Criminal Procedure】The Ghosn case expanded the elements of aggravated breach of trust, resulting in pro-longed detention and repeated re-arrests. Japan's hostage justice is literally arbitrary detention itself. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

6【Assertions of Sovereignty Deviation in the ICC Akane Case】In the ICC Akane case, the U.S. is not an ICC member. Investigating non-member nationals is a devia-tion of sovereignty, and the U.S. asserts that the ICC has improperly expanded its original jurisdiction. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

7【Convenient Expansion of Legal Interpretation by Authorities】Authorities conven-iently expand legal interpretation. My case expanded an employment contract issue—an administrative matter—into a criminal penalty. This is a grave infringement on the principle of legality. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

8【Arbitrary Reduction of Humanitarian Obligations in the Wishma Case】The Wish-ma case ignored domestic violence victim protection provisions and dismissed medical care obligations based on internal regulations. This is an arbitrary reduction of hu-manitarian obligations. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

9【Arbitrary Application of Detention Requirements in the Ghosn Case】The Ghosn case arbitrarily expanded detention requirements and abused re-arrests. This is noth-ing other than a severely distorted operation of criminal procedure. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

10【Criticisms of Expanding International Law Interpretation in the ICC Akane Case】In the ICC Akane case, the ICC interprets that investigation of non-member nationals is possible. Many experts strictly point out this is an expansive interpretation of inter-national law. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

11【Punitive Detention and Show-Trial Justice Against Those Defying Authority】I was refused parole because I claimed my innocence, and was imprisoned until the full term despite being a first-time offender. This is punitive detention, and show-trial justice is Japan's specialty. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

12【Retaliatory Responses in the Wishma and Ghosn Cases】The Wishma case treat-ed complaining detainees as troublesome and denied medical care, while the Ghosn case tightened the screws with extreme bail conditions. These are all punitive re-sponses against those defying authority. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

13【The Structure of Political Punishment in the ICC Akane Case】The ICC Akane case—where investigations continued despite U.S. pressure leading to sanctions—clearly demonstrates the structure of political punishment. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japa-nese))

14【Political Weakness and Limitations of International and Judicial Organs】In both my case and the Wishma case, the UN and international bodies do not intervene in Japan's immigration issues. National political power strongly suppresses the functions of international human rights bodies. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

15【Denunciation of Japan's Governance Structure and Demand for Victim Relief】While shouting about the rule of law, the reality of the Japanese government is rule by decree of power. The international community should denounce the Japanese government to relieve victims worldwide. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

Part 1 Related URL

Death of Wishma Sandamali

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Wishma_Sandamali

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗内閣総理大臣 2026年10月14日日本政府は管轄権逸脱の連鎖を直視し、司法の政治化を即時に断ち切れと断じる！管轄権逸脱と恣意的拘禁の体系的連続性を示す4大事件の構造的分析を日本政府に求める！ 2010年の入管法違反ほう助冤罪事件を起点とし、ウィシュマ事件、ゴーン事件、ICC赤根氏事件に共通する「権力の管轄権逸脱」「恣意的拘禁」「司法の政治化」の構造的同質性を徹底的に暴き、日本政府と国際司法の抜本的改革を迫る告発文書です。（長野恭博）

高市早苗内閣総理大臣

2026年10月14日【今日の提案】2010年の入管法違反ほう助冤罪事件を起点とし、ウィシュマ事件、ゴーン事件、ICC赤根氏事件に共通する「権力の管轄権逸脱」「恣意的拘禁」「司法の政治化」の構造的同質性を徹底的に暴き、日本政府と国際司法の抜本的改革を迫る告発文書です。（長野恭博）

1【4大事件に貫かれる構造的共通性と国家による権限逸脱】２010年6月の私の事件（入管法22条の4第4項を刑事事件化した事件）は、「ウィシュマ事件」「ゴーン事件」「ICC赤根氏事件」と構造的に共通しています。世界は日本を「法の下で統治される国」にすべきです。（長野恭博）

2【3大事件と自事件を貫く体系的整理の必要性】3つの事件はいずれも権力が本来の管轄権を逸脱しています。私の事件を軸に共通点を体系的に整理しなければ、ICC事件も私の事件も決して解決しません。（長野恭博）

3【本来の管轄権を逸脱した恣意的拘禁の現実】本来、私の事件の訴因は“行政処分”です。行政処分に刑事罰のほう助罪は成立しません。それにもかかわらず検察は起訴しました。これは明確な管轄権の逸脱（Arbitrary Detention）です。（長野恭博）

4【ウィシュマ事件における入管裁量による恣意的拘禁】「ウィシュマ事件」は、DV被害者であるにもかかわらず保護ではなく収容され、医療拒否のまま死亡しました。これは入管の裁量による許されざる恣意的拘禁です。（長野恭博）

5【ゴーン事件と日本型刑事司法の人質司法構造】「ゴーン事件」は特別背任の要件を拡張し、長期勾留と再逮捕を繰り返しました。日本の刑事司法の人質司法はまさに恣意的拘禁そのものです。（長野恭博）

6【ICC赤根氏事件における主権逸脱の主張】「ICC赤根氏事件」では、米国はICC未加盟です。未加盟国の国民をICCが捜査するのは主権逸脱であり、ICCが本来の管轄権を不当に拡張したと米国は主張しています。（長野恭博）

7【権力側による都合の良い法解釈の拡張】権力側は法解釈を都合よく拡張します。私の事件は行政処分である雇用契約上の問題を刑事処罰へと拡張しました。これは罪刑法定主義の重大な侵害です。（長野恭博）

8【ウィシュマ事件における人道義務の恣意的縮小】「ウィシュマ事件」はDV被害者保護規定を無視し、医療措置義務を内規を理由に軽視しました。これは人道主義的義務の恣意的縮小です。（長野恭博）

9【ゴーン事件における勾留要件の恣意的運用】「ゴーン事件」は勾留要件を恣意的に拡張し、再逮捕を乱用しました。これは刑事手続の著しく歪んだ運用にほかのなりません。（長野恭博）

10【ICC赤根氏事件における国際法解釈の拡張批判】「ICC赤根氏事件」では、加盟国外の国民も捜査可能とICCは解釈しています。多くの専門家が国際法の拡張解釈であると厳しく指摘しています。（長野恭博）

11【逆らう者に対する懲罰的拘禁と見せしめ司法】私は冤罪主張を理由に仮釈放を拒否され、初犯でありながら満期まで収監されました。これは懲罰的拘禁であり、見せしめ司法は日本の特技です。（長野恭博）

12【ウィシュマ事件とゴーン事件における報復的対応】体調悪化を訴える収容者を「面倒な者」として医療を拒絶したウィシュマ事件、極端な保釈条件で締め付けるゴーン事件、これらはすべて権力に逆らう者への懲罰的対応です。（長野恭博）

13【ICC赤根氏事件における政治的懲罰の構図】ICC赤根氏事件においても、米国の圧力に逆らって捜査を継続し制裁対象となったことは、明確な政治的懲罰の構図を示しています。（長野恭博）

14【国際機関・司法機関が抱える政治的弱さと限界】私の事件でもウィシュマ事件でも、国連や国際機関は日本の入管問題に踏み込みません。国家の政治力が国際人権機関の働きを強く抑制しています。（長野恭博）

15【日本政府の統治構造の告発と被害者救済の要求】日本政府は「法の支配」を叫びながら実態は「権力者による裁定統治」です。世界中の被害者救済のため国際社会は日本政府を糾弾すべきです。（長野恭博）

パート1

Death of Wishma Sandamali

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Wishma_Sandamali

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本人）

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋：私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末：リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2010年5月：この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月：私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理：検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同：入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump – October 13, 2026 "The Contradiction of Europe Praising an Individual Sanctioned by the U.S.: Ms. Akane’s Nomination for the Nobel Prize Challenges the International Legal Order" "Time to Re-examine the ICC’s Overreach of Jurisdiction: Reports of Ms. Akane’s Nobel Nomination Validate U.S. Sanctions" [Legitimate Concerns Regarding Reports of Ms. Akane’s Nobel Peace Prize Nomination] The feeling I had—that "the value of the Nobel Prize would be undermined if Ms. Akane were nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize"—is a "legitimate concern" shared by anyone who understands the structure of international law, even if the Prime Minister of Japan fails to grasp it. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump!

2026-10-13 [Proposal for Today] The structural crisis of international justice and the contradiction of violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention exposed by Tomoko Akane’s nomination report for the Nobel Peace Prize: A thorough critique in 15 sec-tions strongly denouncing the reality that Japan’s arbitrary judicial culture has been exported to international justice, and urging the establishment of true "rule of law" to the world. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1【Legitimate Concerns Regarding the Report on Akane’s Nobel Peace Prize Candida-cy】The feeling I experienced—that "if Akane is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, the value of the Nobel Prize will be shaken"—is a "legitimate concern" held by anyone who understands the structure of international law, even if Japan's Prime Minister cannot grasp it. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2【ICC Arrest Warrant Issuance and Trends in Peace Prize Evaluations】Why was Akane reported as a "Nobel Peace Prize candidate"? This is because the ICC issuing an arrest warrant for President Putin was highly praised by a segment of the interna-tional community. The Nobel Peace Prize tends to evaluate the investigation of war crimes, the protection of civilians, and the strengthening of international criminal jus-tice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3【Grave International Legal Contradictions of Expanding Jurisdiction】However, as I have pointed out, a grave international legal contradiction exists—namely, the ICC's expansion of jurisdiction to investigate non-member states—and it is only natural that criticism arises that ignoring this and nominating her "shakes the value of the Nobel Prize." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4【Arbitrary Selection Criteria and the Fall of the Nobel Prize's Value】The Nobel Peace Prize tends to evaluate the investigation of war crimes, the protection of civil-ians, and the strengthening of international criminal justice. Once again, this appears to be an arbitrary selection. This holds no value. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5【Legitimacy of Intuition Coinciding with Experts' Discussions】The reason why be-ing nominated for the Nobel Prize is said to "shake its value." My intuition completely coincides with the arguments of international law experts. We must uphold codified law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6【Violation of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and Non-Applicability of Exception Interpretations】Reason 1: The ICC is violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. A treaty imposes no obligations on third states. The U.S. is not a member, Israel is not a member, and Russia is not a member. The ICC's exceptional interpretation does not hold! (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7【Questions Regarding Target Countries and Individuals for Arrest Warrants】Despite this, the ICC has investigated and issued arrest warrants for American sol-diers, the Israeli Prime Minister, and the Russian President. This is a violation of the foundational principle of international law (pacta tertiis). Why has an arrest warrant not been issued for Zelenskyy? It is a mystery. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8【Importing Japanese Prosecutorial Culture into the ICC】Reason 2: Akane may have brought Japanese prosecutorial culture (arbitrary interpretation) into the ICC. The structure that occurred in my case—expanding administrative dispositions into criminal punishments, arbitrary detention, and punishing claims of false accusation—is characteristic of Japan's prosecutorial culture. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9【Export of Japanese-Style Arbitrariness in International Justice】Akane originates from the Japanese prosecutor corps and has been deeply involved in the ICC's inves-tigation policies. Consequently, criticism exists that "Japanese-style arbitrariness"—where the ICC expands its jurisdiction to investigate nationals of non-member states—has been exported to international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10【U.S. Government Sanctions Imposed on Akane】Reason 3: The United States sanctioned Akane. The Trump administration imposed sanctions, asset freezes, and entry bans on ICC officials including Akane. This was done via U.S. domestic law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11【Exercise of Authority Over Non-Member States and Vienna Convention Principles】The reason is clear: "The ICC is exercising authority over non-member states. This is a violation of international law. In other words, the U.S. treats Article 34 of the Vien-na Convention as an absolute principle. The ICC is breaking it." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12【Political Evaluation in the Nobel Prize and Reflection of European Values】Reason 4: The Nobel Prize includes "political evaluation." The Nobel Peace Prize is strongly influenced by European political values, international public opinion, and the dynam-ics of international politics. Because the ICC is supported by Europe (especially France and the Netherlands), a structural dynamic exists wherein European political values are reflected in the selection of Nobel Peace Prize candidates. (Yasuhiro Naga-no)

13【Spread of Concerns Shared Among International Relations Scholars】The feeling I experienced—that "this will destroy the value of the Nobel Prize"—is shared among international relations scholars as well. We cannot allow a Nobel Peace Prize to be awarded to violators of international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14【Inseparability of Overcoming International Human Rights Violations and Miscar-riage of Justice Relief】My case involves grave violations of international human rights law: arbitrary detention, infringement on the principle of legality, inhuman treatment, and a lack of remedy. Correcting the ICC's violation of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and forcing adherence to the "rule of law" will lead to correcting my miscarriage of justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15【Realization of Justice Through Continued Petitions to International Bodies】I will continue to submit petitions to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to force Japan to be governed under the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

ICC issues arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova over war crimes related to Ukraine invasion

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/64985430

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano(Japanese)　

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp