To the world media

I appeal for this every day. 1. Create a "special zone" in the world. Instead of developed countries "resetting" their economic stagnation with war, they can make "each other" happy by accepting "refugees and illegal immigrants" as "temporary immigrants" in a "special zone" isolated from the general public, and employing them as "low-wage workers". 2. Establish a "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA). A "Tripartite Military Alliance (G3MA)" will be established between the three countries of "the

To President Trump! October 15, 2026 The United States must not turn a blind eye to Japan's ``deviation from international justice'' The influx of Japanese judicial culture into the ICC is a serious threat to the international legal order, and the United States should take the lead in correcting it. [Structural continuity of the three major incidents] Everyone around the world! My case of false accusation of violating immigration law is the same as the Ghosn case and the ICC Akane case. These are not separate incidents, but a continuous phenomenon of arbitrary legal interpretation and restraint by the authorities. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump!

2026-10-15 [Proposal for Today] An accusatory document exposing the common structure of "arbitrary legal interpretation and detention by authority" linking the 2010 immigration law violation wrongful conviction case to the Carlos Ghosn case and the ICC Akane case, strongly urging the reality that Japan's judicial culture was exported to international justice and demanding an early resolution by the interna-tional community. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1【Structural Continuity of the Three Major Cases】Everyone in the world! My immi-gration law violation wrongful conviction case is identical to the Carlos Ghosn case and the ICC Akane case. These are not separate incidents, but a single continuous phenomenon of arbitrary legal interpretation and detention by authority. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2【Japanese Conformity Pressure and International Responsibility】This stream of events symbolizes the Japanese character. "If everyone crosses on a red light, there's nothing to be afraid of." Even if illegal, if everyone covers for each other, evil be-comes good. The international community should teach Japan justice. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

3【Systematic Organization of the Sequential Flow】The recognition that "everything is connected" is extremely accurate from the perspective of international law and po-litical structures. Below, I systematically organize the common flow centering on my perspective. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4【Arbitrary Detention in My Case】1. My case involved the prosecution criminally interpreting an administrative disposition. Refusing parole for asserting innocence and imprisoning until full term constitutes arbitrary detention and a violation of the princi-ple of legality under international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5【Japanese Judiciary Exposed in the Ghosn Case】2. The Nissan Carlos Ghosn case visualized Japan's judicial structure to the world. Hostage justice with repeated re-arrests and arbitrary expansion of aggravated breach of trust has drawn severe inter-national criticism as "prosecutorial rule." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6【U.S. Political Influence in the Ghosn Case】The father and son who helped Ghosn escape were released under the Biden administration, while the American CFO was arrested under the Trump administration. Treatment changing by administration shows political influence, sharing the exact structure as the ICC Akane case. (Yasuhi-ro Nagano)

7【The ICC Akane case and Export of Judicial Culture】3. Investigating nationals of non-member states in the ICC Akane case is a jurisdictional deviation. Akane origi-nates from the Japanese prosecutor corps, bringing Japanese judicial culture of ex-panded authority and independent interpretation into the ICC. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8【U.S. Sanctions and Independent Interpretation of the Vienna Convention】The U.S. sanctioned her as a deviation from the rule of law. Akane justifies this via inde-pendent interpretation of Vienna Convention Article 34. Punishing dissenters and ex-panding authority are the core of Japan's judicial culture. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9【Common Point 1: Deviation of Authority and Jurisdiction Expansion】4. Common Point 1 is the deviation of authority: criminalizing administrative dispositions in my case, expanding detention requirements in the Ghosn case, and expanding ICC juris-diction to non-member states in the Akane case. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10【Common Point 2: Independent Interpretation and Arbitrary Application】Common Point 2 is independent legal interpretation and arbitrary application: con-structing a non-existent crime in my case, abusing re-arrests in the Ghosn case, and independently interpreting Vienna Convention Article 34 in the Akane case. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11【Common Points 3, 4, and 5: Political Dynamics, Punishment of Dissenters, and Disregard for International Law】Common Points 3, 4, and 5 consistently appear as political influence, the punishment of dissenters, and the disregard for international law such as the ICCPR and international criminal law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12【Historical Trajectory of Japanese Judicial Culture】5. The sequential flow: Japa-nese judicial culture existed in my 2010 case, was exposed to the world in the 2018 Ghosn case, and was exported to international bodies in the 2024 ICC Akane case, conflicting with the U.S. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13【Historical Significance of My Case as the Starting Point】The flow of wrongful conviction in my immigration law violation case was positioned as the starting point for the ICC Akane case, holding historical significance as the earliest demonstration of Japan's structural judicial problems. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14【Limitations of Japanese Legal Consciousness and International Resolution】Japan is a country where people cannot understand international law or the constitution. My case is a major global problem, and an early resolution by the international commu-nity is essential. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15【Demanding Radical Reforms of Judicial Structures】Leaving the structural con-tradictions of Japan's judiciary unaddressed will collapse trust in the international le-gal order. To relieve victims worldwide and realize true rule of law, we strongly de-mand radical reforms. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

[Carlos Ghosn case]

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_Carlos_Ghosn

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.

Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗内閣総理大臣 2026年10月15日日本の司法が国際秩序を揺るがす「恣意的拘束の連鎖」を直視せよ日本的司法文化が国際司法へ波及した構造的危機を政府は正面から認識すべきである 2010年の入管法違反冤罪事件を起点にゴーン事件、ICC赤根氏事件へと連なる「権力の恣意的法解釈と拘束」の共通構造を暴き、日本の司法文化が国際司法に輸出された現実と国際社会による早期解決を強く訴える告発文書です。（長野恭博）

高市早苗内閣総理大臣

2026年10月15日【今日の提案】2010年の入管法違反冤罪事件を起点にゴーン事件、ICC赤根氏事件へと連なる「権力の恣意的法解釈と拘束」の共通構造を暴き、日本の司法文化が国際司法に輸出された現実と国際社会による早期解決を強く訴える告発文書です。（長野恭博）

1【3大事件の構造的連続性】世界の皆さん！私の入管法違反冤罪事件はゴーン事件やICC赤根氏事件と同じです。これらは別々の事件ではなく、権力による恣意的な法解釈と拘束という一つの連続現象です。（長野恭博）

2【日本的同調圧力と国際社会の責任】この事件の流れは日本人の性格を象徴しています。「赤信号、皆で渡れば怖くない」の通り、違法でも庇いあえば悪は善になります。国際社会は日本に正義を教えるべきです。（長野恭博）

3【一連の流れの体系的整理】「全部つながっている」という認識は国際法や政治構造の観点からも正確です。以下、私の視点を中心に共通の流れを体系的に整理します。（長野恭博）

4【私の事件における恣意的拘禁】1.私の事件は、行政処分を検察が独自解釈で刑事犯化しました。冤罪主張を理由に仮釈放を拒否して満期収監したもので、国際法上の恣意的拘禁と罪刑法定主義の侵害にあたります。（長野恭博）

5【ゴーン事件で露呈した日本型司法】2.日産ゴーン事件は日本の司法構造を世界に可視化しました。再逮捕を繰り返す人質司法や特別背任要件の恣意的拡張により、海外から「検察支配」と厳しく批判されています。（長野恭博）

6【ゴーン事件における米国の政権影響】ゴーン逃亡の親子はバイデン政権で釈放された一方、米国人CFOはトランプ政権で逮捕されました。米国でも政権で扱いが変わる政治的影響はICC赤根氏事件と同じ構造です。（長野恭博）

7【ICC赤根氏事件と司法文化の輸出】3.ICC赤根氏事件では未加盟国の国民捜査は管轄権逸脱です。赤根氏は日本検察出身であり、権限拡張や独自解釈という日本の司法文化を国際司法に持ち込んだと指摘できます。（長野恭博）

8【米国制裁とウィーン条約の独自解釈】米国は法の支配の逸脱として赤根氏を制裁しました。赤根氏はウィーン条約34条を独自解釈して正当化していますが、反論者への懲罰や権限拡張は日本的司法文化の核心です。（長野恭博）

9【共通点①：権限の逸脱と管轄権拡張】4.共通点①は権限の逸脱です。私の事件では行政処分の刑事処罰化、ゴーン事件では勾留要件の拡張、赤根事件ではICC管轄権の未加盟国への拡張として現れています。（長野恭博）

10【共通点②：法の独自解釈と恣意運用】共通点②は法の独自解釈と恣意的運用です。私の事件では成立しない犯罪の構成、ゴーン事件では再逮捕の乱用、赤根事件ではウィーン条約34条の独自解釈が行われました。（長野恭博）

11【共通点③④⑤：政治力学・懲罰・国際法軽視】共通点③④⑤は、政治権力の影響、反論者への懲罰、そしてICCPRや国際人権法・刑事法からの国際法軽視として共通して見られます。（長野恭博）

12【日本的司法文化が辿った歴史的軌跡】5.2010年の私の事件で存在した日本的司法文化が、2018年のゴーン事件で世界に露呈し、2024年のICC赤根氏事件で国際機関に輸出されて米国と衝突した、これが一連の流れの本質です。（長野恭博）

13【私の事件が持つ歴史的意味】私の入管法違反冤罪事件の流れは、ICC赤根氏事件の起点に位置しています。日本の司法の恣意性と国際法軽視という構造を最も早期に示したケースとして歴史的意味を持ちます。（長野恭博）

14【日本人の法意識の限界と国際的解決】日本人は国際法や憲法が理解できない国です。私の事件は個人の問題ではなく世界の大きな問題であり、国際社会による早期の解決が不可欠です。（長野恭博）

15【司法構造の抜本的改革の断行】日本の司法制度全体が孕む構造的矛盾を放置すれば国際社会の信頼は失墜します。世界中の被害者救済と真の法の支配実現のため、日本政府と国際社会の抜本的改革を求めます。（長野恭博）

パート1

カルロス・ゴーン事件 / Affaire Carlos Ghosn

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affaire_Carlos_Ghosn

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本人）

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

日本の司法制度および入管行政には、国際社会の基準から見ても極めて重大な人権侵害の疑いがあります。私は自身の経験を通じて、日本の「法治国家」としてのあり方に強い疑問を投げかけます。

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋：私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末：リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2009年：経営環境の悪化により、やむを得ず該当の中国人学生の雇用を取り消しました。そのため、彼らは卒業後も学生時代からのアルバイト（飲食店）を継続せざるを得なくなりました。

2010年5月：この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月：私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理：検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

当時の入管法第22条の4第4号の規定では、虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を得た場合、法務大臣は「行政処分」としてその資格を取り消すことができると定めているに過ぎません。つまり、虚偽書類の提出そのものは、刑罰の対象となる「犯罪」とは規定されていません。犯罪ではない行為を「幇助」したという理屈は、法的に成立しません。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同：入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

正犯なき幇助の矛盾：彼らが働いていた飲食店の雇用主は、入管法第73条の2（不法就労助長罪）で処罰されていません。正犯（実際の雇用主）が処罰されていない以上、法の下の平等の原則に照らし、私たちが処罰されるのは法理的に異常です。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

先進国にとっては低賃金労働力の確保による経済成長、移民にとっては衣食住・医療・教育が無料で保障された人間らしい生活の場となります。双方にメリットのある現実的な解決策です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump – October 14, 2026 The United States must squarely confront the issue of international judicial bodies overstepping their jurisdiction and strongly urge a halt to the ICC’s political runaway actions! Presenting the issues of the ICC’s encroachment on sovereignty and Japan’s system of arbitrary detention to the U.S., and arguing for the necessity of international judicial reform. [Structural Commonalities and State Overreach Across Four Major Cases] My case from June 2010 (in which a violation of Article 22-4, Paragraph 4 of the Immigration Control Act was treated as a criminal matter) shares structural commonalities with the "Wishma Case," the "Ghosn Case," and the "ICC Judge Akane Case." The world must ensure that Japan becomes a nation truly governed by the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump!

2026-10-14 [Proposal for Today] A denunciation document exposing the structural homogeneity of "jurisdictional deviation of authority," "arbitrary detention," and "po-liticization of justice" common to the Wishma case, the Ghosn case, and the ICC Akane case, starting from the 2010 Immigration Control Act wrongful conviction case, and demanding fundamental reforms of the Japanese government and international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

1【Structural Commonalities and State Jurisdictional Deviations Spanning Four Major Cases】My case from June 2010 shares structural commonalities with the "Wishma case," the "Ghosn case," and the "ICC Akane case." The world should make Japan a nation governed under the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

2【The Necessity of Systematically Organizing Common Threads Across Three Major Cases】In these three cases, authorities have deviated from their original jurisdiction. Centered on my case, we must systematically organize the commonalities; otherwise, neither the ICC case nor my case can be resolved. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

3【The Reality of Arbitrary Detention Deviating from Original Jurisdiction】Originally, the charge in my case was an administrative disposition. An administrative disposi-tion does not constitute aiding and abetting under the Penal Code. Despite this, the prosecution indicted me. This is a clear deviation of jurisdiction (Arbitrary Detention). (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

4【Arbitrary Detention via Immigration Discretion in the Wishma Case】The Wishma case involved a domestic violence victim placed in detention rather than protection, who died while denied medical care. This constitutes unpermissible arbitrary deten-tion based on immigration discretion. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

5【The Ghosn Case and Japan's Host Justice Structure in Criminal Procedure】The Ghosn case expanded the elements of aggravated breach of trust, resulting in pro-longed detention and repeated re-arrests. Japan's hostage justice is literally arbitrary detention itself. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

6【Assertions of Sovereignty Deviation in the ICC Akane Case】In the ICC Akane case, the U.S. is not an ICC member. Investigating non-member nationals is a devia-tion of sovereignty, and the U.S. asserts that the ICC has improperly expanded its original jurisdiction. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

7【Convenient Expansion of Legal Interpretation by Authorities】Authorities conven-iently expand legal interpretation. My case expanded an employment contract issue—an administrative matter—into a criminal penalty. This is a grave infringement on the principle of legality. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

8【Arbitrary Reduction of Humanitarian Obligations in the Wishma Case】The Wish-ma case ignored domestic violence victim protection provisions and dismissed medical care obligations based on internal regulations. This is an arbitrary reduction of hu-manitarian obligations. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

9【Arbitrary Application of Detention Requirements in the Ghosn Case】The Ghosn case arbitrarily expanded detention requirements and abused re-arrests. This is noth-ing other than a severely distorted operation of criminal procedure. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

10【Criticisms of Expanding International Law Interpretation in the ICC Akane Case】In the ICC Akane case, the ICC interprets that investigation of non-member nationals is possible. Many experts strictly point out this is an expansive interpretation of inter-national law. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

11【Punitive Detention and Show-Trial Justice Against Those Defying Authority】I was refused parole because I claimed my innocence, and was imprisoned until the full term despite being a first-time offender. This is punitive detention, and show-trial justice is Japan's specialty. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

12【Retaliatory Responses in the Wishma and Ghosn Cases】The Wishma case treat-ed complaining detainees as troublesome and denied medical care, while the Ghosn case tightened the screws with extreme bail conditions. These are all punitive re-sponses against those defying authority. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

13【The Structure of Political Punishment in the ICC Akane Case】The ICC Akane case—where investigations continued despite U.S. pressure leading to sanctions—clearly demonstrates the structure of political punishment. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japa-nese))

14【Political Weakness and Limitations of International and Judicial Organs】In both my case and the Wishma case, the UN and international bodies do not intervene in Japan's immigration issues. National political power strongly suppresses the functions of international human rights bodies. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

15【Denunciation of Japan's Governance Structure and Demand for Victim Relief】While shouting about the rule of law, the reality of the Japanese government is rule by decree of power. The international community should denounce the Japanese government to relieve victims worldwide. (Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese))

Part 1 Related URL

Death of Wishma Sandamali

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Wishma_Sandamali

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗内閣総理大臣 2026年10月14日日本政府は管轄権逸脱の連鎖を直視し、司法の政治化を即時に断ち切れと断じる！管轄権逸脱と恣意的拘禁の体系的連続性を示す4大事件の構造的分析を日本政府に求める！ 2010年の入管法違反ほう助冤罪事件を起点とし、ウィシュマ事件、ゴーン事件、ICC赤根氏事件に共通する「権力の管轄権逸脱」「恣意的拘禁」「司法の政治化」の構造的同質性を徹底的に暴き、日本政府と国際司法の抜本的改革を迫る告発文書です。（長野恭博）

高市早苗内閣総理大臣

2026年10月14日【今日の提案】2010年の入管法違反ほう助冤罪事件を起点とし、ウィシュマ事件、ゴーン事件、ICC赤根氏事件に共通する「権力の管轄権逸脱」「恣意的拘禁」「司法の政治化」の構造的同質性を徹底的に暴き、日本政府と国際司法の抜本的改革を迫る告発文書です。（長野恭博）

1【4大事件に貫かれる構造的共通性と国家による権限逸脱】２010年6月の私の事件（入管法22条の4第4項を刑事事件化した事件）は、「ウィシュマ事件」「ゴーン事件」「ICC赤根氏事件」と構造的に共通しています。世界は日本を「法の下で統治される国」にすべきです。（長野恭博）

2【3大事件と自事件を貫く体系的整理の必要性】3つの事件はいずれも権力が本来の管轄権を逸脱しています。私の事件を軸に共通点を体系的に整理しなければ、ICC事件も私の事件も決して解決しません。（長野恭博）

3【本来の管轄権を逸脱した恣意的拘禁の現実】本来、私の事件の訴因は“行政処分”です。行政処分に刑事罰のほう助罪は成立しません。それにもかかわらず検察は起訴しました。これは明確な管轄権の逸脱（Arbitrary Detention）です。（長野恭博）

4【ウィシュマ事件における入管裁量による恣意的拘禁】「ウィシュマ事件」は、DV被害者であるにもかかわらず保護ではなく収容され、医療拒否のまま死亡しました。これは入管の裁量による許されざる恣意的拘禁です。（長野恭博）

5【ゴーン事件と日本型刑事司法の人質司法構造】「ゴーン事件」は特別背任の要件を拡張し、長期勾留と再逮捕を繰り返しました。日本の刑事司法の人質司法はまさに恣意的拘禁そのものです。（長野恭博）

6【ICC赤根氏事件における主権逸脱の主張】「ICC赤根氏事件」では、米国はICC未加盟です。未加盟国の国民をICCが捜査するのは主権逸脱であり、ICCが本来の管轄権を不当に拡張したと米国は主張しています。（長野恭博）

7【権力側による都合の良い法解釈の拡張】権力側は法解釈を都合よく拡張します。私の事件は行政処分である雇用契約上の問題を刑事処罰へと拡張しました。これは罪刑法定主義の重大な侵害です。（長野恭博）

8【ウィシュマ事件における人道義務の恣意的縮小】「ウィシュマ事件」はDV被害者保護規定を無視し、医療措置義務を内規を理由に軽視しました。これは人道主義的義務の恣意的縮小です。（長野恭博）

9【ゴーン事件における勾留要件の恣意的運用】「ゴーン事件」は勾留要件を恣意的に拡張し、再逮捕を乱用しました。これは刑事手続の著しく歪んだ運用にほかのなりません。（長野恭博）

10【ICC赤根氏事件における国際法解釈の拡張批判】「ICC赤根氏事件」では、加盟国外の国民も捜査可能とICCは解釈しています。多くの専門家が国際法の拡張解釈であると厳しく指摘しています。（長野恭博）

11【逆らう者に対する懲罰的拘禁と見せしめ司法】私は冤罪主張を理由に仮釈放を拒否され、初犯でありながら満期まで収監されました。これは懲罰的拘禁であり、見せしめ司法は日本の特技です。（長野恭博）

12【ウィシュマ事件とゴーン事件における報復的対応】体調悪化を訴える収容者を「面倒な者」として医療を拒絶したウィシュマ事件、極端な保釈条件で締め付けるゴーン事件、これらはすべて権力に逆らう者への懲罰的対応です。（長野恭博）

13【ICC赤根氏事件における政治的懲罰の構図】ICC赤根氏事件においても、米国の圧力に逆らって捜査を継続し制裁対象となったことは、明確な政治的懲罰の構図を示しています。（長野恭博）

14【国際機関・司法機関が抱える政治的弱さと限界】私の事件でもウィシュマ事件でも、国連や国際機関は日本の入管問題に踏み込みません。国家の政治力が国際人権機関の働きを強く抑制しています。（長野恭博）

15【日本政府の統治構造の告発と被害者救済の要求】日本政府は「法の支配」を叫びながら実態は「権力者による裁定統治」です。世界中の被害者救済のため国際社会は日本政府を糾弾すべきです。（長野恭博）

パート1

Death of Wishma Sandamali

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Wishma_Sandamali

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本人）

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋：私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末：リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2010年5月：この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月：私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理：検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同：入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump – October 13, 2026 "The Contradiction of Europe Praising an Individual Sanctioned by the U.S.: Ms. Akane’s Nomination for the Nobel Prize Challenges the International Legal Order" "Time to Re-examine the ICC’s Overreach of Jurisdiction: Reports of Ms. Akane’s Nobel Nomination Validate U.S. Sanctions" [Legitimate Concerns Regarding Reports of Ms. Akane’s Nobel Peace Prize Nomination] The feeling I had—that "the value of the Nobel Prize would be undermined if Ms. Akane were nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize"—is a "legitimate concern" shared by anyone who understands the structure of international law, even if the Prime Minister of Japan fails to grasp it. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump!

2026-10-13 [Proposal for Today] The structural crisis of international justice and the contradiction of violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention exposed by Tomoko Akane’s nomination report for the Nobel Peace Prize: A thorough critique in 15 sec-tions strongly denouncing the reality that Japan’s arbitrary judicial culture has been exported to international justice, and urging the establishment of true "rule of law" to the world. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1【Legitimate Concerns Regarding the Report on Akane’s Nobel Peace Prize Candida-cy】The feeling I experienced—that "if Akane is nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, the value of the Nobel Prize will be shaken"—is a "legitimate concern" held by anyone who understands the structure of international law, even if Japan's Prime Minister cannot grasp it. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2【ICC Arrest Warrant Issuance and Trends in Peace Prize Evaluations】Why was Akane reported as a "Nobel Peace Prize candidate"? This is because the ICC issuing an arrest warrant for President Putin was highly praised by a segment of the interna-tional community. The Nobel Peace Prize tends to evaluate the investigation of war crimes, the protection of civilians, and the strengthening of international criminal jus-tice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3【Grave International Legal Contradictions of Expanding Jurisdiction】However, as I have pointed out, a grave international legal contradiction exists—namely, the ICC's expansion of jurisdiction to investigate non-member states—and it is only natural that criticism arises that ignoring this and nominating her "shakes the value of the Nobel Prize." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4【Arbitrary Selection Criteria and the Fall of the Nobel Prize's Value】The Nobel Peace Prize tends to evaluate the investigation of war crimes, the protection of civil-ians, and the strengthening of international criminal justice. Once again, this appears to be an arbitrary selection. This holds no value. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5【Legitimacy of Intuition Coinciding with Experts' Discussions】The reason why be-ing nominated for the Nobel Prize is said to "shake its value." My intuition completely coincides with the arguments of international law experts. We must uphold codified law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6【Violation of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and Non-Applicability of Exception Interpretations】Reason 1: The ICC is violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. A treaty imposes no obligations on third states. The U.S. is not a member, Israel is not a member, and Russia is not a member. The ICC's exceptional interpretation does not hold! (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7【Questions Regarding Target Countries and Individuals for Arrest Warrants】Despite this, the ICC has investigated and issued arrest warrants for American sol-diers, the Israeli Prime Minister, and the Russian President. This is a violation of the foundational principle of international law (pacta tertiis). Why has an arrest warrant not been issued for Zelenskyy? It is a mystery. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8【Importing Japanese Prosecutorial Culture into the ICC】Reason 2: Akane may have brought Japanese prosecutorial culture (arbitrary interpretation) into the ICC. The structure that occurred in my case—expanding administrative dispositions into criminal punishments, arbitrary detention, and punishing claims of false accusation—is characteristic of Japan's prosecutorial culture. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9【Export of Japanese-Style Arbitrariness in International Justice】Akane originates from the Japanese prosecutor corps and has been deeply involved in the ICC's inves-tigation policies. Consequently, criticism exists that "Japanese-style arbitrariness"—where the ICC expands its jurisdiction to investigate nationals of non-member states—has been exported to international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10【U.S. Government Sanctions Imposed on Akane】Reason 3: The United States sanctioned Akane. The Trump administration imposed sanctions, asset freezes, and entry bans on ICC officials including Akane. This was done via U.S. domestic law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11【Exercise of Authority Over Non-Member States and Vienna Convention Principles】The reason is clear: "The ICC is exercising authority over non-member states. This is a violation of international law. In other words, the U.S. treats Article 34 of the Vien-na Convention as an absolute principle. The ICC is breaking it." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12【Political Evaluation in the Nobel Prize and Reflection of European Values】Reason 4: The Nobel Prize includes "political evaluation." The Nobel Peace Prize is strongly influenced by European political values, international public opinion, and the dynam-ics of international politics. Because the ICC is supported by Europe (especially France and the Netherlands), a structural dynamic exists wherein European political values are reflected in the selection of Nobel Peace Prize candidates. (Yasuhiro Naga-no)

13【Spread of Concerns Shared Among International Relations Scholars】The feeling I experienced—that "this will destroy the value of the Nobel Prize"—is shared among international relations scholars as well. We cannot allow a Nobel Peace Prize to be awarded to violators of international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14【Inseparability of Overcoming International Human Rights Violations and Miscar-riage of Justice Relief】My case involves grave violations of international human rights law: arbitrary detention, infringement on the principle of legality, inhuman treatment, and a lack of remedy. Correcting the ICC's violation of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and forcing adherence to the "rule of law" will lead to correcting my miscarriage of justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15【Realization of Justice Through Continued Petitions to International Bodies】I will continue to submit petitions to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) to force Japan to be governed under the rule of law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

ICC issues arrest warrants for Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova over war crimes related to Ukraine invasion

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/64985430

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano(Japanese)　

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗内閣総理大臣 2026年10月13日「国際法秩序の崩壊を直視せよ：赤根氏ノーベル候補報道が示した日本司法文化の国際的危険性」「日本型恣意司法を世界へ輸出するな：赤根氏ノーベル候補化は国際法破壊の象徴である」赤根智子氏のノーベル平和賞候補報道が露呈させた国際法の構造的危機とウィーン条約34条違反の矛盾：日本発の恣意的な司法文化が国際司法に輸出された現実を告発し、真の「法の下の統治」の確立を世界に向けて強く訴える全15節の徹底批判です。（長野恭博）

高市早苗内閣総理大臣

2026年10月13日【今日の提案】赤根智子氏のノーベル平和賞候補報道が露呈させた国際法の構造的危機とウィーン条約34条違反の矛盾：日本発の恣意的な司法文化が国際司法に輸出された現実を告発し、真の「法の下の統治」の確立を世界に向けて強く訴える全15節の徹底批判です。（長野恭博）

1【赤根氏のノーベル平和賞候補報道に対する正当な懸念】私が感じた「赤根氏がノーベル平和賞候補に挙がると、ノーベル賞の価値が揺らぐ」という感覚は、日本の首相は理解できないが、国際法の構造を理解している人なら誰でも抱く“正当な懸念”です。（長野恭博）

2【ICCの逮捕状発行と平和賞評価の傾向】なぜ赤根氏が「ノーベル平和賞候補」と報道されたのか。これはICCがプーチン大統領に逮捕状を出したことが国際社会の一部で高く評価されたためです。ノーベル平和賞は、戦争犯罪の捜査、民間人保護、国際刑事司法の強化などを評価する傾向があります。（長野恭博）

3【管轄権拡張という重大な国際法上の矛盾】しかし、私が指摘しているように、ICCの管轄権拡張（未加盟国への捜査）という重大な国際法上の矛盾が存在しており、これを無視して候補に挙げることは「ノーベル賞の価値を揺るがす」という批判が出るのは自然です。（長野恭博）

4【恣意的な選定基準とノーベル賞価値の失墜】ノーベル平和賞は、戦争犯罪の捜査、民間人保護、国際刑事司法の強化、などを評価する傾向があります。今回も恣意的な選定のようです。これでは価値がない。（長野恭博）

5【専門家の議論と一致する直感の正当性】ノーベル賞候補化が「価値を揺るがす」と言われる理由。私の直感は、国際法の専門家の議論と完全に一致しています。明文化された法を守るべきです。（長野恭博）

6【ウィーン条約34条違反と例外解釈の非適用】理由①：ICCはウィーン条約34条を破っている。条約は第三国に義務を課さない。米国は未加盟、イスラエルも未加盟、ロシアも未加盟です。ＩＣＣの例外解釈は通用しない！（長野恭博）

7【逮捕状発行の対象国・人物に関する疑問】それにもかかわらず、ICCは、米兵、イスラエル首相、ロシア大統領を捜査し、逮捕状を出しています。これは国際法の根幹原則（pacta tertiis）への違反です。なぜゼレンスキー氏には逮捕状が出ないのか？不思議です。（長野恭博）

8【日本型検察文化のICCへの持ち込み】理由②：赤根氏は日本の検察文化（恣意的解釈）をICCに持ち込んだ可能性がある。私の事件で起きた、行政処分を刑事罰に拡張、恣意的拘禁、冤罪主張への懲罰という構造は、日本の検察文化の特徴です。（長野恭博）

9【国際司法における日本型恣意性の輸出】赤根氏は日本の検察官出身であり、ICCの捜査方針に深く関与してきました。その結果、ICCが管轄権を拡張し、未加盟国の国民を捜査するという“日本型の恣意性”が国際司法に輸出されたとの、批判があります。（長野恭博）

10【米国政府による赤根氏への制裁措置】理由③：米国は赤根氏を制裁した。トランプ政権は、赤根氏を含むICC職員を制裁、資産凍結、米国入国禁止を行いました。これは米国の国内法で制裁をしています。（長野恭博）

11【未加盟国への権限行使とウィーン条約原則】理由は明確です：「ICCは未加盟国に権限を行使している。これは国際法違反である。つまり、米国はウィーン条約34条を絶対原則として扱っている。ICCはそれを破っている。（長野恭博）

12【ノーベル賞の政治的評価と欧州価値観の反映】理由④：ノーベル賞は“政治的評価”を含む。ノーベル平和賞は、欧州の政治的価値観、国際世論、国際政治の力学に強く影響されます。ICCは欧州（特にフランス・オランダ）に支えられているため、欧州の政治的価値観がノーベル賞候補選定に反映される、という構造があります。（長野恭博）

13【国際政治学者間で共有される懸念の広がり】私が感じた「これではノーベル賞の価値がなくなる」という感覚は、国際政治学者の間でも共有されています。国際法の違反者にノーベル平和賞を授与させることはできません。（長野恭博）

14【国際人権法違反の克服と冤罪救済の不可分性】私の事件は、恣意的拘禁、罪刑法定主義の侵害、非人道的取扱い、救済の欠如、という国際人権法の重大違反を含んでいます。ＩＣＣのウィーン条約34条を正し「法の下での統治」を守らせることが、私の冤罪を正すことに繋がります。（長野恭博）

15【国際機関への継続的告訴による正義の実現】私は今後も、日本を法の下で統治させるために、国連人権理事会（UNHRC）、恣意的拘禁作業部会（WGAD）、OHCHR（人権高等弁務官事務所）の告訴場を提出します。（長野恭博）

パート1

プーチン大統領らに逮捕状、ウクライナ侵攻めぐる戦争犯罪容疑国際刑事裁判所

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/64985430](https://www.bbc.com/japanese/64985430

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本人）

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋：私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末：リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2010年5月：この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月：私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理：検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同：入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump – October 12, 2026 "The ICC’s overreach of jurisdiction is an outrageous act that destroys the international order; the United States must not overlook this crisis."* "The ICC’s acts exceeding its authority constitute a challenge to the international order. The United States should maintain firm sanctions." [Background on the ICC’s jurisdictional expansion and Nobel Prize reports] The "rule of law" originating from Japan is a source of fear! The reports naming Ms. Tomoko Akane as a "Nobel Peace Prize candidate" stem from the fact that the ICC’s issuance of an arrest warrant for President Putin was highly acclaimed by certain segments of the international community. However, many people are outraged by the ICC’s violation of international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

To President Trump!

2026-10-12 [Proposal for Today] A resolute and aggressive 15-section policy state-ment denouncing the crisis of the rule of law originating in Japan, the contradictions of international justice, Tomoko Akane’s nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize as a reflection of the violation of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention, and the global dis-semination of Japanese-style arbitrariness. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1【Expansion of ICC Jurisdiction and the Nobel Peace Prize Coverage】The rule of law originating in Japan is terrifying! The background behind Tomoko Akane being re-ported as a "Nobel Peace Prize candidate" is that the ICC issuing an arrest warrant for President Putin was highly praised by a segment of the international community. Many people are outraged by the ICC's violations of international law. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

2【Grave International Legal Contradictions and Criticisms of Candidate Selection】As I have pointed out, a grave international legal contradiction exists—namely, the ICC's expansion of jurisdiction to investigate non-member states—and it is only natural that criticism arises that ignoring this and nominating her "shakes the value of the Nobel Prize." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3【Why the Nobel Peace Prize Candidate Coverage Is Problematic】Why is the cover-age of being a "Nobel Peace Prize candidate" problematic? The sense of incongruity I felt is extremely justified even from the perspective of international law. The key point is Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4【The Reality of Violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention】Reason 1: The ICC is violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. A treaty imposes no obligations on third states. The U.S. is not an ICC member, Israel is not a member, and Russia is not a member. Despite this, the ICC has investigated and issued arrest warrants for American soldiers, the Israeli Prime Minister, and the Russian President. This is an act that breaches the foundational principle of international law (pacta tertiis). (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

5【Importing Japanese Prosecutorial Culture into International Justice】Reason 2: Akane may have brought Japanese prosecutorial culture (arbitrary interpretation) into the ICC. The structure that occurred in my case—expanding administrative disposi-tions into criminal punishments, arbitrary detention, and punishing claims of false ac-cusation—is characteristic of Japan's prosecutorial culture. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6【Akane’s Background and the Global Spread of Arbitrariness】Akane originates from the Japanese prosecutor corps and has been deeply involved in the ICC's inves-tigation policies. Consequently, criticism exists that "Japanese-style arbitrariness"—where the ICC expands its jurisdiction to investigate nationals of non-member states—has been exported to international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7【U.S. Sanctions Imposed on Akane】Reason 3: The United States sanctioned Akane. The Trump administration imposed sanctions, asset freezes, and entry bans on ICC officials including Akane. The reason is clear, and Russia's sanctions are like-wise clear. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8【Illegality of Exercising Authority Over Non-Member States】"The ICC is exercising authority over non-member states. This is a violation of international law." In other words, the U.S. and Russia treat Article 34 of the Vienna Convention as an absolute principle. The ICC is breaking it. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9【Political Evaluation in the Nobel Peace Prize and European Values】Reason 4: The Nobel Prize includes "political evaluation." The Nobel Peace Prize is strongly influ-enced by international politics, international public opinion, and European values. The Nobel Prize is on the verge of being politicized. It is regrettable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10【Institutional Reflection of European Political Values】Because the ICC is support-ed by Europe (especially France and the Netherlands), a structural dynamic exists wherein European political values are reflected in the selection of Nobel Peace Prize candidates. It is crazy! (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11【Concerns Shared Among International Relations Scholars】The feeling I experi-enced—that "this will destroy the value of the Nobel Prize"—is shared among interna-tional relations scholars as well. Everyone, please verify this through Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12【Structural Complete Consistency with My Case】The structural connection to my case. My case is the earliest concrete example where the Japanese judiciary deviated from its original authority and arbitrarily expanded it. That structure is completely consistent with the ICC's problem. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13【From Japanese Judicial Structural Issues to Global Impact】My case is the case that most early on demonstrated the structural problems of the Japanese judiciary, forming part of the same continuous structure as the ICC problem. The 2010 Immi-gration Control Act violation case even exerted influence up to the ICC. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14【Overcoming Human Rights Violations and Fundamental Reform of Domestic Gov-ernance】My case involves grave violations of international human rights law: arbi-trary detention, infringement on the principle of legality, inhuman treatment, and a lack of remedy. Unless Japan is governed under the rule of law, the ICC problem cannot be resolved. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15【Continued Petitions to International Bodies and the Victory of Justice】I will con-tinue submitting petitions to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), and the Office of the UN High Com-missioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Justice will surely triumph. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

ICC nominated for Nobel Peace Prize; PRIO predicts, "Emphasizing responsibility to respect international law"

https://news.ntv.co.jp/category/international/7c11cf199c5345c3a2c30d3a8eb752b6

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese people)

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗内閣総理大臣 2026年10月12日「国際司法の逸脱を放置する日本政府の怠慢は、国家統治の根幹を揺るがす危機である」「日本は国際法の破綻を直視せよ。統治の崩壊を招いているのは政府自身であると断じざるを得ない」日本発の法の下の統治の危機と国際司法の矛盾：赤根智子氏のノーベル平和賞報道が映し出すウィーン条約34条違反の構図と日本型恣意性のグローバルな拡散を断固告発するアグレッシブな全15節の政策提言です。（長野恭博）

高市早苗内閣総理大臣

2026年10月12日【今日の提案】日本発の法の下の統治の危機と国際司法の矛盾：赤根智子氏のノーベル平和賞報道が映し出すウィーン条約34条違反の構図と日本型恣意性のグローバルな拡散を断固告発するアグレッシブな全15節の政策提言です。（長野恭博）

1【ICCの管轄権拡張とノーベル賞報道の背景】日本発の法の下の統治が恐怖だ！赤根智子氏が「ノーベル平和賞候補」と報道された背景は、「ICC」がプーチン大統領に逮捕状を出したことが、国際社会の一部で高く評価されたためです。多くの人々がＩＣＣの国際法違反に怒っています。（長野恭博）

2【国際法上の重大な矛盾と候補選定への批判】私が指摘しているように、ICCの管轄権拡張（未加盟国への捜査）という重大な国際法上の矛盾が存在しており、これを無視して候補に挙げることは「ノーベル賞の価値を揺るがす」という批判が出るのは自然です。（長野恭博）

3【なぜ「ノーベル賞候補」報道が問題なのか】なぜ「ノーベル賞候補」という報道が問題なのか！私が感じた違和感は、国際法の観点から見ても極めて正当です。ポイントはウィーン条約34条です。（長野恭博）

4【ウィーン条約34条違反の現実】理由①：ICCはウィーン条約34条を破っている。条約は第三国に義務を課さない。米国はICC未加盟、イスラエルも未加盟、ロシアも未加盟です。それにもかかわらず、ICCは、米兵、イスラエル首相、ロシア大統領を捜査し、逮捕状を出しています。これは、国際法の根幹原則（pacta tertiis）を破戒する行為です。（長野恭博）

5【日本型検察文化の国際司法への持ち込み】理由②：赤根氏は日本の検察文化（恣意的解釈）をICCに持ち込んだ可能性がある。私の事件で起きた、行政処分を刑事罰に拡張、恣意的拘禁、冤罪主張への懲罰という構造は、日本の検察文化の特徴だからです。（長野恭博）

6【赤根氏の経歴とグローバルな恣意性】赤根氏は日本の検察官出身であり、ICCの捜査方針に深く関与してきました。その結果、ICCが管轄権を拡張し、未加盟国の国民を捜査するという“日本型の恣意性”が国際司法に輸出されたという批判があります。（長野恭博）

7【米国による赤根氏への制裁措置】理由③：米国は赤根氏を制裁した。トランプ政権は赤根氏を含むICC職員を制裁、資産凍結、米国入国禁止を行いました。理由は明確で、ロシアの制裁も明確です。（長野恭博）

8【未加盟国に対する権限行使の違法性】「ICCは未加盟国に権限を行使している。これは国際法違反である」。つまり、米国やロシアはウィーン条約34条を絶対原則として扱っている。ICCはそれを破っている。（長野恭博）

9【ノーベル平和賞の政治的評価と欧州の価値観】理由④：ノーベル賞は「政治的評価」を含む。ノーベル平和賞は、国際政治、国際世論、欧州の価値観、に強く影響されます。ノーベル賞が政治化されようとしている。残念だ。（長野恭博）

10【欧州政治価値観の反映と制度的構造】ICCは欧州（特にフランス・オランダ）に支えられているため、欧州の政治的価値観がノーベル賞候補選定に反映される、という構造があります。クレイジーだ！（長野恭博）

11【国際政治学者の間で共有される懸念】私が感じた「これではノーベル賞の価値がなくなる」という感覚は、国際政治学者の間でも共有されています。皆さんもウィーン条約34条で確認してください。（長野恭博）

12【筆者の事件との構造的完全一致】私の事件との構造的つながり。私の事件は、日本の司法が本来の権限を逸脱し、恣意的に拡張した最初期の具体例です。その構造はICCの問題と完全に一致しています。（長野恭博）

13【日本司法の構造問題から世界への影響】私の事件は、日本の司法構造の問題を最も早期に示したケースであり、ICCの問題と連続した同じ構造の一部です。2010年の入管法違反事件は、ＩＣＣにまで影響を与えました。（長野恭博）

14【国際人権法違反の克服と国内統治の抜本改革】私の事件は、恣意的拘禁、罪刑法定主義の侵害、非人道的取扱い、救済の欠如という国際人権法の重大違反を含んでいます。日本を法の下で統治しなければ、ＩＣＣ問題は解決しない。（長野恭博）

15【国際機関への継続的告訴と正義の勝利】私は、引き続き、国連人権理事会（UNHRC）、恣意的拘禁作業部会（WGAD）、OHCHR（人権高等弁務官事務所）に告訴状を提出していきます。正義は必ず勝利します。（長野恭博）

パート1

ノーベル平和賞候補にICC オスロ国際平和研究所が予想「国際法尊重の責任を強調」

[https://news.ntv.co.jp/category/international/7c11cf199c5345c3a2c30d3a8eb752b6](https://news.ntv.co.jp/category/international/7c11cf199c5345c3a2c30d3a8eb752b6)

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本人）

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋：私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末：リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2010年5月：この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月：私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理：検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同：入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump – October 11, 2026 [The Real Prospect of a Historic Defeat and a Fragile Lead] If independent voters shift toward the Democratic Party, the Republicans could face a historic defeat; in my assessment, this outcome appears all but certain. Reports indicate that the House majority could flip with only a slight shift in seats. The Republican lead is extremely fragile. (Yasuhiro Nagano) "The risk of losing the House majority threatens to shake the very foundations of the administration's governance." "The Republican Party is on the brink of collapse. Unless my proposal is adopted, the administration cannot survive."

To President Trump

October 11, 2026 [Today's Proposal]If the Republican Party loses its majority in the House of Representatives, the Trump administration will face a fatal deadlock. Now, as support from independent voters is lost, we should cooperate with Republican lawmakers to appeal my proposals to the electorate and achieve a miraculous "Ultra-C." Overcoming the divergence in stance that the Japanese government showed with the United States at the UN General Assembly, we must guide America back to a strong, smart, and peaceful country through the true "PIFT" strategy. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

1. [Loss of Republican Majority and the Crisis of the Trump Administration] If the Re-publican Party loses its majority in the House of Representatives, the Trump admin-istration will reach an impasse in congressional dealings over bill passage and budg-ets. With Mr. Trump's approval ratings, it is difficult for the Republican Party to win a majority. Will they say once again that the Democratic Party stole the votes? At the UN General Assembly, Mr. Trump was abandoned even by the Japanese government. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2. [Alienation of Independent Voters and Dissatisfaction with Economic Policy] The article clearly states that the evaluation by independent voters is extremely severe. Only 24% answered that the economic situation is "good." Sixty percent answered that "the economy worsened due to Mr. Trump's policies." Living costs—such as pric-es, housing costs, medical expenses, and food prices—are at the center of the dissat-isfaction. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3. [Failure of Policies Directly Connected to Living Costs] In other words, Mr. Trump's Republican Party has almost lost the support of independent voters on policies direct-ly connected to daily life. Independent voters have the sense that "there are no un-derstandable policies." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4. [The Reality of a Historic Landslide Defeat and Fragile Advantage] If independent voters flow to the Democratic Party, the Republican Party faces the possibility of a "historical landslide defeat," but in my sense, it seems certain. The article also notes that the majority in the House can shift with just slight seat fluctuations. The Repub-lican advantage is extremely fragile. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5. [Structural Defeat Brought About by the Re-election of All 435 Seats] Furthermore, all 435 seats in the House are up for re-election. The evaluation of independent vot-ers is easily reflected in the seats as it is. If independent voters flow heavily to the Democratic Party, the Republican Party is structured to suffer a massive defeat. This is not just a "feeling"—it is backed up by the data in the article. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6. [The Strategy of Mobilizing Enthusiastic Supporters Chosen by Mr. Trump] Then, what will Mr. Trump do in the remaining period? Reading not from speculation but from the structure of the article and past behavioral patterns: (1) He will pour all his efforts into mobilizing his "enthusiastic base." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7. [Core Supporter Mobilization Dictating Midterm Election Results] The article also states that midterm elections have low voter turnout, and "how many enthusiastic supporters can be mobilized will determine the outcome." Rather than winning back independent voters, he is highly likely to head toward a strategy of maximizing the mobilization of his core supporters. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8. [The Framework of Shifting Responsibility for Soaring Living Costs] (2) He will strengthen the "shifting of responsibility" for the economy and living costs. The article clearly specifies that living costs are the biggest issue. Mr. Trump is likely to shift re-sponsibility for this onto the Democratic Party, immigrants, and international situa-tions. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9. [Projecting a "Strong Leader" Image Using Diplomacy and Security] (3) He will project a "strong leader" image by utilizing diplomacy and security. The article states that diplomacy affects the domestic economy and becomes an election issue. Mr. Trump is likely to emphasize a "hardline stance" on issues such as China, the Middle East, and Ukraine to solidify the unity of his support base. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10. [Intensifying Attacks on the Democratic Party and Fostering a Sense of Crisis] (4) He will further intensify attacks on the Democratic Party. The article states that the results of 2026 will serve as a prelude to the 2028 presidential election. Mr. Trump is likely to strengthen messages that fan a sense of crisis, asserting that "if power is handed to the Democratic Party, America will collapse." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11. [Complete Consistency Between My Reading and the Article's Content] My read-ing is "completely consistent with the content of the article." Independent voters do not support Mr. Trump's policies. Economic evaluations are extremely low (24%). Dissatisfaction with living costs is strong. The House majority can flip with minor fluc-tuations. If independent voters flow to the Democratic Party, the Republicans face a potential massive defeat. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12. [Achieving a Miraculous Ultra-C Through My Proposals] Mr. Trump is likely to concentrate on mobilizing his base rather than capturing independent voters. My analysis matches both the article's data and the political-science structure. Building on that, Mr. Trump should cooperate with Republican lawmakers to appeal my pro-posals to voters and achieve a miraculous "Ultra-C." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13. [A Major Geopolitical Signal Exhibited by the Japanese Government] Even at the UN General Assembly, Japan claimed that since the postwar era it has "emphasized the rule of law in resolving conflicts." Furthermore, it has been reported that ICC President Tomoko Akane being Japanese also heightened support pressure domesti-cally. President Trump criticized the ICC at the UN General Assembly as a "runaway institution" and stated, "Member states should withdraw immediately." (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

14. [The Transformation of Allies and the Relative Weakening of America] Allies, in-cluding Japan, openly took a "different stance" from the United States. Japan is America's most vital ally. The fact that Japan did not align with the U.S. ICC sanction policy at the UN General Assembly and explicitly stated its support for the ICC is a major signal in international politics. In the past, allies usually aligned with the U.S. position. But this time was different. This is also interpreted as "America's relative weakening." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15. [The Path to National Reconstruction Through PIFT] "PIFT" (Peace, Industry, and Fair Trade) - Let's make America a strong, smart, and peaceful country again. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Reference

The 2026 U.S. Midterm Elections: Beyond Simple Wins and Losses, What Points Should Be Examined?

https://topics.smt.docomo.ne.jp/article/npn/nation/npn-300491631?redirect=1

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

3. Sunday Edition (Dysfunction of Domestic Institutions and Global Recommendations - Chapters 7-8)

Part 2: Immigration Law Violation Cases, Sunday Edition

Chapter 7: When I was released from prison after completing my sentence, I read the newspaper and found out that a similar incident had occurred at the Philippine Embassy.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

Philippine diplomats, embassy staff, and Filipino drivers have suffered the same damage as me.

I have also filed a criminal accusation against this case.

I and the Chinese in the 2010 immigration law violation case, and the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomats in 2013, were punished for the same reason.

I have submitted my complaint and the complaints of the Chinese and Filipinos to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, and the Supreme Public Prosecutors Office.

However, all of them were rejected. If the prosecutor accepts and rejects the case, I can request the Prosecutor's Review Board to prosecute, but I have no way to oppose the rejection.

I also appealed to political parties and Diet members. But they were all ignored.

A city council member accompanied me to the Democratic Party's legal advisor. However, the advisor's answer was that if the "principal offense" is found guilty, then the "crime of aiding and abetting" is established. Is he really a lawyer?

The Democratic Party's legal advisor says that all those who graduated from the Legal Training and Research Institute have the same answer. This is proof that Japan is not "governed under the law".

I asked the Japan Bar Association for support. They said that the JFBA does not have the "power" to solve the problem. Japan's "judicial system" is crazy.

I have "emailed" "political parties and Diet members", as well as "the Prime Minister's Office and the Human Rights Bureau" on "Facebook and (X)", but they are still ignoring me.

This case is an arbitrary misapplication of the law by police officers, prosecutors, and judges. (It is an illegal act).

The charges are "Abuse of the authority of a special public official" and "Crimes of False Complaints".

In my "personal opinion," the prosecutors "concealed" the "criminal complaint" and "criminal accusation" by their "authority." Therefore, the "statute of limitations" has been suspended.

"Chapter 8." This case is "legally" an "error in the application of law."

"Errors in the application of law" are not subject to "requests for retrial" under the "Criminal Procedure Law."

However, if the "crime of the inspectors and police officers involved in the case" is "proven," a request for retrial can be made.

1. The charge against the "special public officials" in this case is "abuse of the authority of special public officials."

They "arrested" us even though there was "no suspicion of a crime." And they even "detained" us. (There is a precedent for grand jury decisions.)

2. And it is "the crime of false accusation." It is a fact that they "indicted" us and even found us guilty in a "trial" in order to make us criminals.

Requests for retrial can be made by us or by the prosecutors.

I believe that the prosecution should admit guilt and make a request for a retrial.

I will not give up. It has been 15 years since the incident.

The only country that can resolve this case is the United States.

When Trump was the former president, he promised me.

He replied with a signed letter saying, "I will resolve this in a way that satisfies you."

I hope that this time he will keep his promise.

President Trump, let's work together to "revive the Rust Belt" and create a "special zone on the Mexican border."

And let's cross the Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean in two hours with the "American Linear Canal Railway," a freight train dedicated to containers that will replenish the Panama Canal.

People around the world, please support us.

Part 3. Construction of a special zone. It's a new business model.

No2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

No1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Part 4. "US-Russia-China" three-nation military alliance and war show

No2: https://urc-military.seesaa.net/

No1: https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

Part 5. Ukraine War

No2: https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/

No1: https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

Part 6. Japan's infamous judicial system and human rights violations

No2: https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/

No1: https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

Part 7. Development of virus detectors for coronavirus and other viruses

https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

Part 8. North Korea's abduction and missile issues

https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

Part 9. One Coin Union & Hydrogen Vehicle Promotion

https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

Part 10. Nagano Opinion, Next Generation Nuclear Power Plant: CO2 Free & SDGs

https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

長野恭博　オピニオン 2026年10月11日共和党が下院で過半数を失えばトランプ政権は致命的な行き詰まりに直面する。無党派層の支持を失った今こそ、私の提案を共和党議員と連携して選挙民にアピールし、奇跡のウルトラCを実現するべきだ。国連総会で日本政府が見せた米国との不同調を乗り越え、真の「PIFT」戦略によってアメリカを再び強く賢く平和な国へと導かなければならない。（長野恭博）「日米同盟の揺らぎを直視し、PIFT戦略による秩序再構築を急ぐべきである」「日本は米国の漂流を止めねばならない。PIFTで同盟の再定義を断行すべきである」

長野恭博　オピニオン

2026年10月11日【今日の提案】共和党が下院で過半数を失えばトランプ政権は致命的な行き詰まりに直面する。無党派層の支持を失った今こそ、私の提案を共和党議員と連携して選挙民にアピールし、奇跡のウルトラCを実現するべきだ。国連総会で日本政府が見せた米国との不同調を乗り越え、真の「PIFT」戦略によってアメリカを再び強く賢く平和な国へと導かなければならない。（長野恭博）

1.【共和党の過半数喪失とトランプ政権の危機】共和党が下院で過半数を失えば、トランプ政権は法案成立や予算をめぐる議会対応でいきづまることになる。トランプ氏の支持率では、共和党が過半数を得ることは難しい。今度は民主党が票を盗まれたと言うだろうか？国連総会で、トランプ氏は日本政府からも見捨てられた。（長野恭博）

2.【無党派層の離反と経済政策への不満】記事では無党派層の評価が極めて厳しいことが明確に書かれています。経済状況を良いと答えたのは24％だけ。6割がトランプ氏の政策で経済が悪化したと回答。物価・住宅費・医療費・食品価格など生活コストが不満の中心だ。（長野恭博）

3.【生活コストに直結する政策の失敗】つまり、トランプ氏の共和党は生活に直結する政策で無党派層の支持をほぼ失っている。無党派層には理解できる政策がないという感覚だ。（長野恭博）

4.【歴史的大敗の現実味と脆弱な優位性】無党派層が民主党に流れれば共和党は歴史的な大敗の可能性があるが、私の感覚では確定のようだ。記事でも下院はわずかな議席変動で多数派が入れ替わると書かれています。共和党の優位は非常に脆弱です。（長野恭博）

5.【全435議席の改選がもたらす構造的敗北】さらに下院は435議席すべてが改選。無党派層の評価がそのまま議席に反映されやすい。無党派層が民主党に大きく流れれば共和党は大敗する構造になっている。これは感覚ではなく記事のデータが裏付けています。（長野恭博）

6.【トランプ氏が選ぶ熱心な支持層動員戦略】では残された期間でトランプ氏は何をするのか？ここは推測ではなく記事の構造と過去の行動パターンから読み解くと、①熱心な支持層の動員に全力を注ぐ。（長野恭博）

7.【中間選挙の勝敗を握るコア支持層の結束】記事でも中間選挙は投票率が低く、熱心な支持層をどれだけ動員できるかが結果を左右すると書かれています。無党派層を取り戻すのではなく、コア支持層を最大限に動員する戦略に向かう可能性が高い。（長野恭博）

8.【生活コストの高騰に対する責任転嫁の構図】(2)経済・生活コストの責任転嫁を強める。記事では生活コストが最大の争点と明記されています。トランプ氏はこれを民主党、移民、国際情勢などに責任転嫁する可能性が高い。（長野恭博）

9.【外交・安全保障を利用した強いリーダー像の演出】(3)外交・安全保障を利用して強いリーダー像を演出。記事は外交が国内経済に影響し選挙の争点になると述べています。トランプ氏は中国、中東、ウクライナなどの問題で強硬姿勢を強調し、支持層の結束を固める方向に動く可能性が高い。（長野恭博）

10.【民主党への攻撃と危機感を煽るメッセージ】(4)主党への攻撃をさらに強める。記事では2026年の結果が2028年大統領選の前哨戦になると書かれています。トランプ氏は民主党に政権を渡せばアメリカが崩壊するという危機感を煽るメッセージを強める可能性が高いです。（長野恭博）

11.【私の読みと記事内容の完全一致】私の読みは記事の内容と完全一致している。無党派層はトランプ氏の政策を支持していない。経済評価は極めて低い（24％）。生活コストへの不満が強い。下院はわずかな変動で多数派が入れ替わる。無党派層が民主党に流れれば共和党は大敗の可能性。（長野恭博）

12.【私の提案による奇跡のウルトラCの実現】トランプ氏は無党派層の取り込みより支持層の動員に集中する可能性が高い。私の分析は記事のデータと政治学的構造の両方と一致している。そのうえで、トランプ氏は私の提案を共和党議員と連携して選挙民にアピールし、奇跡のウルトラCを実現するべきです。（長野恭博）

13.【日本政府が見せた国際政治上の大きなシグナル】国連総会でも、日本は戦後紛争の解決に法の支配を重視してきたと主張した。さらに、ICC所長・赤根智子氏が日本人であることも国内で支持圧力を高めたと報じられています。トランプ大統領は国連総会でICCを暴走した機関、加盟国は直ちに脱退せよと批判しました。（長野恭博）

14.【同盟国の変容と米国の相対的弱体化】日本を含む同盟国が米国と異なる立場を公然と取った。日本は米国の最重要同盟国です。その日本が国連総会で米国のICC制裁方針に同調せずICC支持を明言したことは、国際政治上の大きなシグナルです。かつてなら同盟国は米国の立場に合わせるのが常でしたが今回は違った。これも米国の相対的弱体化と解釈されます。（長野恭博）

15.【PIFTによる新たな国家再建への道】「PIFT」（Peace・Industry・Fair Trade）Let's make America a strong, smart, and peaceful country again.（長野恭博）

パート1 参考文献

2026年の米中間選挙単なる勝敗だけでなく、見るべきポイントとは

https://topics.smt.docomo.ne.jp/article/npn/nation/npn-300491631?redirect=1

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本語）

3. 日曜版（国内機関の機能不全とグローバル提言・第7章〜第8章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【日曜版】

【第7章】国内の救済手続きにおける機能不全

刑期満了による釈放後、私は2013年にフィリピン大使館関係者が私と全く同じ構図の不当な摘発（入管法違反）に遭っていることを知りました。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

私はこの構造的冤罪を正すため、東京地方検察庁、東京高等検察庁、最高検察庁に対して「告訴状」および「告発状」を提出しました。しかし、検察はこれらをすべて「不受理」という形で門前払いしました。「不起訴」であれば検察審査会へ不服を申し立てる道がありますが、「不受理」にすることで、法的に対抗する手段すら奪われたのです。

また、政党や国会議員、弁護士会（日弁連）にもこの司法の歪みを訴えましたが、保身や知識不足からか、すべて無視または拒絶されました。大手政党の顧問弁護士ですら「正犯が有罪なら幇助も成立する」という思考停止の回答に終始し、日本の法秩序の崩壊を痛感せざるを得ませんでした。

検察・警察・裁判所によるこの一連の行為は、「特別公務員職権乱用罪」および「虚偽告訴罪」に該当する不法行為です。検察が職権でこれらの告訴・告発を隠蔽し続けているため、時効のカウントは停止していると解釈すべきです。

【第8章】再審請求への意志とアメリカへの期待

刑事訴訟法上、単なる「適用法の誤り」は再審請求の理由から除外されています。しかし、当時の捜査・裁判に関わった「公務員の犯罪」が立証されれば、再審の扉は開かれます。根拠なき不当逮捕（職権乱用）と、無実の者を罪人に仕立て上げた罪（虚偽告訴）を追及し、検察自らが非を認めて再審請求を行うべきです。事件から15年が経過しましたが、私は決して諦めません。

この日本の閉鎖的な司法システムを打破できる外部の力は、米国をおいて他にありません。トランプ氏は前大統領在任時、私に対し「満足のいく方法で解決する」との趣旨の署名入り返信をくれました。私はこの約束の実現を強く期待しています。

【トランプ大統領への共同提案】

ラストベルト（製造業地帯）の復活、およびメキシコ国境への「特別地帯」の建設を共に進めましょう。さらに、パナマ運河を補完するコンテナ専用の高速貨物鉄道「アメリカ・リニア運河鉄道」を敷設し、カリブ海から太平洋をわずか2時間で横断する新物流ルートを構築しましょう。

世界の皆様の、温かいご支援とご注目をお願いいたします。

第3部以降：各プロジェクトへのリンク

第3部：特別地帯の建設（新しいビジネスモデル）

No2：https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

No1：https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

第4部：「米ロ中」3国軍事同盟・戦争ショー

No2：https://urc-military.seesaa.net/

No1：https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

第5部：ウクライナ戦争

No2：https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/

No1：https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

第6部：悪名高い日本の司法制度・人権侵害

No2：https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/

No1：https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

第7部：コロナなどのウイルス感知器開発

https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

第8部：北朝鮮の拉致・ミサイル問題

https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

第9部：ワンコインユニオン＆水素自動車の推進

https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

第10部：次世代原発（CO2フリー）＆ SDGs

https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump — October 10, 2026 [The Japanese government is adopting an irresponsible, passive stance.] Although the President of the ICC is currently making decisions that encroach upon U.S. sovereignty, the Japanese government is effectively the party that installed that very official. The fact that the Japanese government is not being held accountable in any way is highly unnatural from the perspective of international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano) Challenging the Japanese government's inaction in tacitly accepting the ICC's interference with U.S. sovereignty: A clear point that must be raised with the President. Mr. President, the Japanese government cannot be allowed to continue permitting the ICC’s overreach: Urgently rebuild the Japan-U.S. alliance.

To President Trump　

October 10, 2026 [Today's Proposal]The ongoing interference with U.S. sover-eignty by the ICC and the Japanese government's tacit approval of it are far too lenient. The time has come to firmly challenge the responsibility of the Jap-anese government, which ignores the spirit of the Vienna Convention and re-peats human rights violations and arbitrary judicial judgments to maintain its own power. Now is the time to work together with Mr. President to normalize the U.S.-Japan alliance and stand up to rebuild an international order that nev-er tolerates violations of individual human rights. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1. [A Blunt Word to President Trump] Too lenient! Regarding the situation where the Japanese government is practically condoning the interference with U.S. sovereignty by the ICC President, Mr. President, as a Japanese citizen, I am deeply concerned about the issue of sovereignty violation by the ICC that the United States is facing. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2. [The Irresponsible Bystander System of the Japanese Government] Current-ly, even though the ICC President is making decisions that step into U.S. sov-ereignty, the situation is such that they effectively "sent" that President into office. The fact that the Japanese government has not been held accountable in any way is extremely unnatural from the perspective of international law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3. [The Basic Principle Demanded by Article 34 of the Vienna Convention] The Japanese government is not upholding the spirit of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. Article 34 of the Vienna Convention is an important provision sup-porting the fundamental principle of international law that "States must not condone acts that violate the sovereignty of other nations." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4. [The Deception of the Japanese Government Condoning Violations of Inter-national Law] However, the Japanese government condones the ICC Presi-dent's acts of stepping into U.S. sovereignty and evades responsibility despite being deeply involved in the selection process. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5. [The Domestic Reality That Has Forgotten Rule of Law] This cannot be said to be the attitude of a nation practicing the "Rule of Law." The Japanese gov-ernment routinely commits human rights violations domestically through illegal dispositions as well. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6. [The Indignation of Americans Over the Leniency of the Japanese Govern-ment] Why is the Japanese government not held accountable?—Americans are also outraged by that leniency. I understand that Mr. President's imposition of sanctions on ICC officials is a legitimate measure to protect U.S. sovereignty. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7. [The Absurdity Shaking the Equality of U.S.-Japan Relations] Nevertheless, it must be said that the current situation where the Japanese government, which effectively sent that President into office, is not subject to any sanctions at all is far too lenient. The Japanese government explains that "ICC decisions are made by an independent body," but the fact that it was involved in the se-lection process does not disappear. America is not Japan's servant. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8. [Clear Points Requested of Mr. President] I hope that Mr. President will clearly point out the following to the Japanese government: "Condoning inter-ference with U.S. sovereignty by the ICC President runs counter to the spirit of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention and cannot be considered the stance of a nation that upholds the rule of law." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9. [Eliminating Ambiguity Necessary for the Future of the U.S.-Japan Alliance] The actions of the Japanese ICC President should not leave "ambiguity" for the sake of the U.S.-Japan alliance either. The U.S.-Japan alliance is the most criti-cal pillar supporting stability in the Asia-Pacific. Therefore, the Japanese gov-ernment's casual treatment of the principles of international law will bring dis-advantages to both the U.S. and Japan in the long run. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10. [Arbitrary Domestic Judicial Judgments and the Immigration Control Act Incident] The actions of the Japanese ICC President are deeply connected to the "Immigration Control Act Violation Incident" of 2010. Japanese justice han-dles events inconvenient to the judiciary with authoritarianism, ignoring the Constitution and laws to pass judgment, and arbitrarily turning people into criminals. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11. [The Unjustness of Administrative Dispositions and the Impossibility of Ap-plying Complicity under Criminal Law] As described in Part 2 of this post, the count in the indictment is based on Article 22-4-04 of the Immigration Control Act (revocation of residence status), which is a discretionary administrative disposition. Therefore, it is impossible to apply the crime of complicity under the Penal Code. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12. [The Stance Demanding Thorough Enforcement of the Rule of Law] I hope that Mr. President will demonstrate a clear stance toward the Japanese gov-ernment, demanding that it "thoroughly enforce the rule of law." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13. [Individual Human Rights Violations That Cannot Be Ignored in Interna-tional Society] The Japanese government will likely brush this under the rug once again, but triggered by the ICC incident, the current international situa-tion has entered a period where "violations of individual human rights are easi-ly re-evaluated," so I believe it cannot be ignored. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14. [My Case as a Concrete Example Demonstrating Structural Contradictions in International Law] Rather, my case has reached a situation where it can be treated as a concrete example showing the "structural contradictions of inter-national law." I believe it is time to move the United Nations. My background is "PIFT" (Peace, Industry, and Fair Trade). (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15. [Rebuilding a Powerful and Peaceful Nation for the Future] Let's make America a strong, smart, and peaceful country again. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Reference

Trump Administration Set to Increase Pressure on ICC... Dollar-Denominated Settlement Ban May Disrupt Operations

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/world/20260921-GYT1T00245/

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

2. Saturday Edition

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Saturday Edition]

For the case overview (Chapters 1 and 2), please refer to the Weekday Edition.

Throughout this unjust trial, I consistently maintained my innocence based on rigorous legal logic. However, the police and prosecution ignored my arguments, attempting to coerce a confession based on arbitrary generalizations.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 3] Appeals to the International Community and Legal Contradictions

Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan guarantees due process, stating that no person shall be deprived of life or liberty except according to procedure established by law (the principle of legality). Yet, the prosecution in this case forcefully misapplied administrative provisions to fit the Penal Code’s definition of aiding and abetting. This demonstrates a severe lack of legal competence and constitutes an abuse of official authority.

Following our case in 2010 and a nearly identical incident involving Philippine Embassy staff in 2013, international criticism intensified against Japan's arbitrary enforcement of the law.

Consequently, the Japanese government amended the Immigration Control Act in December 2016 (effective January 2017) to explicitly criminalize the act of "providing false employment contracts."

This statutory amendment is irrefutable proof that no such crime existed under the previous law when we were charged, meaning we were entirely innocent. Article 39 of the Constitution strictly prohibits retroactive punishment (ex post facto laws). Despite this clear legal reality, the government has offered no apology, restoration of honor, or compensation.

[Chapter 4] Supporting Legal Documents

The official indictment and the validity of my legal arguments are publicly accessible through the following documents (available in Japanese and English):

Official Indictment (JA/EN)

http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

My Legal Argument (Japanese)

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98

My Legal Argument (English)

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

[Chapter 5] Petitions to International Organizations

Following my release, I sought redress from foreign embassies in Japan, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and the International Criminal Court (ICC).

An ambassador from an African nation advised me that while diplomatic ties prevented an official state protest, they could engage networks within the ICC. I believe this international pressure ultimately forced the 2016 statutory amendment.

The number of foreign nationals—including Chinese, Korean, Filipino, and American citizens—who fall victim to such arbitrary legal interpretations in Japan is estimated to be in the tens or hundreds of thousands. This is an alarming crisis that the international community cannot ignore.

Continued in the Sunday Edition.

Part 3: Special Economic Zones (Business Model)

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

*Please refer to the "Sunday Edition" for Parts 4 through 10.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp