To President Trump: September 15, 2026 "An exchange rate *of* the people, *by* the people, and *for* the people... is not 160 yen. The people do not desire such high import prices." Prompted by U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent’s remarks regarding the correction of the weak yen, this analysis examines the impact of rectifying the extreme yen depreciation and restoring the currency's true value. Considering scenarios such as the sale of foreign currency reserves, shocks to financial markets, and the effects on Japan's import prices and export-oriented companies, the proposal advocates for aiming at an optimal equilibrium point around 100 yen and establishing a sustainable international trade order through the introduction of "equilibrium countervailing tariffs." (Yasuhiro Nagano) [The Significance of the U.S. Treasury Secretary’s Remarks on Correcting the Weak Yen] The backdrop to U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent’s statement—expressing strong support for "decisive measures and interest rate hikes by Japan"—is a sense of crisis that the current extreme yen depreciation is beginning to destabilize the international financial balance. For both Japan and the U.S., the exchange rate level near 160 yen is unstable, making a normalization of the currency rate inevitable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

 To President Trump!

September 15, 2026 [Proposal of the Day] Triggered by U.S. Treasury Secretary Bes-sent's statements correcting the weak yen, this proposal analyzes the impact of cor-recting the extreme weak yen and the recovery of the yen's strength, considers as-sumptions of selling foreign exchange reserves and shocks to financial markets, eval-uates the effects on Japanese import prices and export-oriented companies, aims for an optimal equilibrium point around 100 yen, and emphasizes the importance of building a sustainable international trade order through the introduction of "Equilibri-um Compensating Tariffs." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1 [Meaning of the U.S. Treasury Secretary's Statement on Correcting the Weak Yen] The background behind U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent stating that he "strongly supports Japan's resolute measures and interest rate hikes" is a sense of crisis that the current extreme weak yen is beginning to break the equilibrium of international finance. For both Japan and the U.S., the 160 yen range is unstable, making the normalization of exchange rates inevitable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2 [A Stronger Yen is Not Dollar Depreciation, But the Recovery of the Yen's Strength] A strong yen does not mean dollar depreciation; rather, it is a phenomenon where the yen strengthens against the dollar. The U.S. faces inconveniences with both a strong and weak dollar, and a strong yen is not necessarily bad for the U.S. Instead, it has the effect of lowering import prices of Japanese products and suppressing con-sumer prices within the U.S. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3 [Assumption of Japan Selling Foreign Exchange Reserves] If Japan sells half of its foreign exchange reserves (approximately 500 billion dollars) and moves to buy yen, a historical shock wave will ripple through the foreign exchange market. Dollar sales on the scale of hundreds of billions of dollars would exceed the absorption capacity of the market, likely causing the yen to surge by tens of yen per dollar. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

4 [The Boomerang Effect on Japan Itself] The majority of Japan's foreign exchange reserves are U.S. Treasuries, and large-scale sales would trigger a plunge in U.S. Treasury prices. As a result, this becomes a structural boomerang where Japan itself incurs massive valuation losses, leaving a serious scar on the Ministry of Finance's balance sheet. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5 [Financial Market Shocks Caused by a Strong Yen] With carry trades—borrowing the yen cheaply to invest in dollar assets—having grown massive today, a rapid ap-preciation of the yen triggers a global unwinding of positions. Stock, bond, and com-modity markets could experience wild fluctuations, potentially causing a Lehman-scale financial shock. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6 [Limited Impact on the U.S. Economy] A strong yen is a blow to export-oriented companies targeting Japan, but overall in the U.S., the import prices of Japanese products will fall, providing a positive boost to consumers and corporate costs. Even during the 75-yen era in 2011, the U.S. economy did not collapse, and a strong yen alone does not sink the U.S. structure. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7 [Benefits to Japan's Import Prices and Consumers] A strong yen significantly push-es down Japan's import prices. Food and energy prices drop, and real wages improve. This is a welcome environment for consumers, leading to the stabilization of living costs. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8 [Serious Blow to Exporting Companies] On the other hand, exporting companies will see profits plummet and stock prices drop. Although major corporations like Toyota and Sony have increased their overseas production ratios, a rapid appreciation of the yen brings major pain to their profit structures. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9 [Lessons Left by the Super-Strong Yen of 2011] During the period of 75 yen per dollar, Japanese companies pursued thorough rationalization and overseas relocation. This pain formed the current corporate strength. While a strong yen is painful in the short term, it also has aspects that lead to strengthened competitiveness in the long term. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10 [Inducing from 160 Yen to 75 Yen is Impossible] For Japan to intentionally bring the rate back from 160 yen to 75 yen would require astronomical dollar selling, and mobilizing all foreign exchange reserves would not be enough. It is impossible both politically and in terms of international finance, making it an unrealistic policy choice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11 [An Optimal Equilibrium Point Around 100 Yen] A rate of around 100 yen per dol-lar satisfies three elements: the stabilization of import prices, the resilience of export-ing companies, and the stability of financial markets. It is the most balanced zone for both Japan and the U.S., serving as a realistic level to enhance exchange rate stabil-ity. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12 [Historical Consistency of U.S.-China Trade Structure and the Strong Yen] The 1990s to 2010s saw the simultaneous progression of a strong yen/weak dollar and the expansion of U.S.-China trade. Japan shifted factories to China amid the strong yen, while American companies advanced fabless models. This structural change generated the current distortions in global trade. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13 [Turmoil in U.S. Trade Policy] From this period onward, U.S. trade policy became unstable, turning exchange rates and trade deficits into political issues. While a strong yen inflicted pain on U.S. manufacturing, the benefit of consumer price stabil-ity simultaneously existed. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14 [The Effectiveness of Equilibrium Compensating Tariffs] "Equilibrium Compensat-ing Tariffs," which balance imports and exports for each nation, are an ideal system that renders currency manipulation meaningless and brings trade stability. A settle-ment structure independent of exchange rates contributes to the sustainable stability of the international economy. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15 [Conclusion: Exchange Rate Stability and a New International Trade System] A strong yen deals a major shock to Japan and the world, but stability around 100 yen is optimal for both nations. The introduction of equilibrium compensating tariffs can end currency wars and serve as a realistic solution to build a sustainable international trade order. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

U.S. Treasury Secretary Bessent singles out Japan, stating "Reflative policies should be stopped"... and calls for reviewing expansionary fiscal policy and raising interest rates

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/economy/20260902-GYT1T00332/

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.

Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗 内閣総理大臣 2026年7月27日 「私は嘘をつかない。…そして、円が160円のままでも嘘をつかない。だからこそ、100円前後に戻す“真実の斧”が必要だ。」 【円高はドル安ではなく円の実力回復】円高＝ドル安ではなく、円がドルに対して強くなる現象です。アメリカはドル高でもドル安でも不都合を抱えており、円高は必ずしも米国にとって悪ではありません。むしろ日本製品の輸入価格が下がり、米国内の消費者物価を抑える効果があります。（長野恭博） 【日本の外貨準備売却の仮定】日本が外貨準備の半分（約5,000億ドル）を売却し円買いに動けば、為替市場に歴史的な衝撃が走ります。数千億ドル規模のドル売りは市場の吸収能力を超え、円が数十円単位で急騰する可能性が高いです。（長野恭博）

 Au président français Emmanuel Macron

15 septembre 2026 [Proposition du jour] S'appuyant sur les déclarations du secrétaire au Trésor américain Bessent visant à corriger la faiblesse du yen, cette proposition analyse l'impact d'une telle correction et du renforcement de la monnaie japonaise. Elle examine les hypothèses d'une vente de réserves de change et les chocs potentiels sur les marchés financiers, évalue les effets sur les prix à l'importation au Japon et sur les entreprises exportatrices, vise un point d'équilibre optimal autour de 100 yens pour un dollar, et souligne l'importance d'établir un ordre commercial international durable grâce à l'introduction de « droits de douane compensatoires d'équilibre ». (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1 [Signification de la déclaration du secrétaire au Trésor américain sur la correction de la faiblesse du yen] Le secrétaire au Trésor américain Bessent a exprimé son « soutien ferme aux mesures résolues et aux hausses de taux d'intérêt du Japon » en raison d'un sentiment d'urgence : la faiblesse extrême actuelle du yen menace de rompre l'équilibre de la finance internationale. Pour le Japon comme pour les États-Unis, le niveau de 160 yens pour un dollar est instable, rendant inévitable une normalisation des taux de change. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2 [Un yen plus fort ne signifie pas une dépréciation du dollar, mais un renforcement du yen] Un yen fort ne signifie pas une dépréciation du dollar ; il s'agit plutôt d'un phénomène de renforcement du yen face au dollar. Les États-Unis subissent des inconvénients aussi bien avec un dollar fort qu'avec un dollar faible, et un yen fort n'est pas nécessairement néfaste pour eux. Au contraire, cela a pour effet de réduire les prix à l'importation des produits japonais et de contenir les prix à la consommation aux États-Unis. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3 [Hypothèse d'une vente de réserves de change par le Japon] Si le Japon vendait la moitié de ses réserves de change (environ 500 milliards de dollars) pour racheter des yens, une onde de choc historique traverserait le marché des changes. Des ventes de dollars se chiffrant en centaines de milliards dépasseraient la capacité d'absorption du marché, provoquant probablement une flambée du yen de plusieurs dizaines de yens par rapport au dollar. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4 [L'effet boomerang pour le Japon lui-même] La majeure partie des réserves de change du Japon est constituée de bons du Trésor américain ; des ventes massives provoqueraient une chute de leur cours. Il en résulterait un effet boomerang structurel : le Japon subirait lui-même d'énormes moins-values ​​latentes, laissant une cicatrice profonde au bilan du ministère des Finances. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5 [Chocs sur les marchés financiers dus à la vigueur du yen] Les opérations de « carry trade » — consistant à emprunter des yens à faible coût pour investir dans des actifs libellés en dollars — ayant pris une ampleur considérable, une appréciation rapide du yen déclenche un débouclage mondial des positions. Les marchés des actions, des obligations et des matières premières pourraient connaître une volatilité extrême, risquant de provoquer un choc financier comparable à la faillite de Lehman Brothers. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6 [Impact limité sur l'économie américaine] Un yen fort pénalise les entreprises exportatrices ciblant le Japon, mais, à l'échelle des États-Unis, la baisse du prix des importations japonaises profite aux consommateurs et réduit les coûts des entreprises. Même lorsque le yen s'échangeait à 75 pour un dollar en 2011, l'économie américaine ne s'est pas effondrée ; la seule vigueur du yen ne suffit pas à déstabiliser la structure économique des États-Unis. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7 [Avantages pour les prix à l'importation et les consommateurs japonais] Un yen fort réduit considérablement le coût des importations au Japon. Les prix de l'alimentation et de l'énergie baissent, tandis que les salaires réels augmentent. Cette situation est favorable aux consommateurs, car elle stabilise le coût de la vie. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8 [Coup dur pour les entreprises exportatrices] En revanche, les entreprises exportatrices voient leurs bénéfices et le cours de leurs actions chuter. Bien que de grands groupes comme Toyota et Sony aient accru la part de leur production à l'étranger, une appréciation rapide du yen fragilise considérablement leur rentabilité. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9 [Enseignements de la période de yen ultra-fort de 2011] Lorsque le yen s'échangeait à 75 pour un dollar, les entreprises japonaises ont mis en œuvre une rationalisation rigoureuse et délocalisé une partie de leur production à l'étranger. Ces épreuves ont forgé la solidité actuelle des entreprises. Si la vigueur du yen est douloureuse à court terme, elle contribue également à renforcer la compétitivité à long terme. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10 [Impossible de ramener le taux de 160 à 75 yens] Pour que le Japon ramène délibérément le taux de change de 160 à 75 yens pour un dollar, il faudrait vendre des quantités astronomiques de dollars ; la mobilisation de la totalité des réserves de change ne suffirait même pas. Une telle mesure est impossible tant sur le plan politique que financier, ce qui en fait un choix irréaliste. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11 [Un point d'équilibre optimal autour de 100 yens] Un taux d'environ 100 yens pour un dollar satisfait trois critères : la stabilisation des prix à l'importation, la résilience des entreprises exportatrices et la stabilité des marchés financiers. C'est la zone la plus équilibrée tant pour le Japon que pour les États-Unis, constituant un niveau réaliste pour renforcer la stabilité des taux de change. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12 [Cohérence historique entre la structure commerciale sino-américaine et le yen fort] La période allant des années 1990 aux années 2010 a vu la progression simultanée d'un yen fort (et d'un dollar faible) et de l'expansion du commerce entre les États-Unis et la Chine. Le Japon a délocalisé ses usines en Chine dans un contexte de yen fort, tandis que les entreprises américaines ont privilégié des modèles sans usine (« fabless »). Ce changement structurel a engendré les distorsions actuelles du commerce mondial. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13 [Instabilité de la politique commerciale américaine] À partir de cette période, la politique commerciale américaine est devenue instable, transformant les taux de change et les déficits commerciaux en enjeux politiques. Si le yen fort a nui au secteur manufacturier américain, il a simultanément offert l'avantage de stabiliser les prix à la consommation. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14 [L'efficacité des droits de douane compensatoires d'équilibre] Les « droits de douane compensatoires d'équilibre », visant à équilibrer les importations et les exportations de chaque nation, constituent un système idéal rendant vaine toute manipulation monétaire et apportant une stabilité commerciale. Un mécanisme de règlement indépendant des taux de change contribue à la stabilité durable de l'économie internationale. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15 [Conclusion : Stabilité des taux de change et nouveau système de commerce international] Un yen fort représente un choc majeur pour le Japon et le monde, mais une stabilité autour de 100 yens est optimale pour les deux nations. L'instauration de droits de douane compensatoires d'équilibre peut mettre fin aux guerres des monnaies et servir de solution réaliste pour bâtir un ordre commercial international durable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Lien connexe (Partie 1)

Le secrétaire au Trésor américain Bessent pointe le Japon du doigt, déclarant que « les politiques de reflation doivent cesser »... et appelle à revoir la politique budgétaire expansionniste ainsi qu'à relever les taux d'intérêt.

https://www.yomiuri.co.jp/economy/20260902-GYT1T00332/

Je vous écrirai de nouveau demain.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japonais)

1. Édition de la semaine (Contradictions logiques dans les affaires de violation du droit de l'immigration - Chapitres 1 et 2)

Partie 2 : L'affaire de violation de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration [Édition de la semaine]

Le système judiciaire et l'administration de l'immigration japonais sont impliqués dans de graves violations des droits humains qui remettent en cause les normes internationales. De par ma propre expérience, je remets fortement en question le statut du Japon en tant qu'État de droit constitutionnel.

Veuillez d'abord lire comment j'ai été injustement impliqué dans une affaire de « complicité de violation de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration » en 2010.

Lire le texte intégral ici : To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapitre 1] Aperçu de l'affaire

Automne 2008 : Mon entreprise (dont je suis le président) a signé un contrat de travail avec des étudiants chinois titulaires de visas d'études, leur promettant une embauche à l'issue de l'obtention de leur diplôme universitaire au printemps suivant.

Fin 2008 : La faillite de Lehman Brothers a déclenché une crise financière mondiale, entraînant l’annulation brutale de nos projets de développement de systèmes.

2009 : Face à la grave récession économique, nous avons été contraints d’annuler les offres d’emploi. Par conséquent, les étudiants diplômés n’ont eu d’autre choix que de continuer à travailler dans les restaurants où ils avaient été employés à temps partiel pendant leurs études.

Mai 2010 : Ces anciens étudiants chinois ont été arrêtés pour « Activités autres que celles autorisées par le statut de résident » (violation de l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration).

Juin 2010 : Mon responsable du recrutement chinois et moi-même avons également été arrêtés. Nous avons été accusés de « complicité » (en vertu du Code pénal) de leur emploi technique illégal.

Argumentaire de l’accusation : L’accusation a soutenu que la délivrance préalable de notre contrat de travail constituait un « faux document », facilitant ainsi leur travail illégal.

[Chapitre 2] Erreurs fatales d'interprétation judiciaire

L'acte d'accusation et le jugement subséquent méconnaissent totalement les principes juridiques fondamentaux, s'appuyant sur une interprétation entièrement arbitraire de la loi.

Aux termes de l'article 22-4, paragraphe 1, point 4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration en vigueur à l'époque, la production de faux documents autorisait uniquement le ministre de la Justice à révoquer un titre de séjour par mesure administrative (entraînant une expulsion). Le fait de produire de faux documents n'était pas en soi une infraction pénale. Logiquement, on ne peut être condamné pour « complicité » d'un acte qui n'est pas un crime en soi.

Le raisonnement du tribunal repose sur une chaîne de causalité alambiquée :

Un titre de séjour a été obtenu grâce à un faux contrat de travail.

Les personnes concernées ont résidé au Japon grâce à ce titre.

Par conséquent, elles ont exercé un travail à temps partiel non autorisé.

Dès lors, l'auteur du contrat initial s'est rendu complice de ce travail illégal.

Il s'agit d'un lien de causalité tiré par les cheveux et fallacieux, qui viole totalement les principes de la logique juridique moderne.

[Mon argument]

Confusion entre mesures administratives et sanctions pénales : La loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne explicitement les conséquences de la falsification de documents comme des mesures administratives (révocation du statut et expulsion). La procédure légale s'arrête là.

Absence d'auteur principal : Les employeurs des restaurants où travaillaient les étudiants n'ont jamais été poursuivis pour « incitation au travail illégal » (article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration). En vertu du principe d'égalité devant la loi, il est juridiquement contradictoire de nous punir pour complicité alors que les employeurs principaux n'ont pas été poursuivis.

Cette même doctrine juridique erronée a ensuite été appliquée à tort à des diplomates et au personnel des ambassades.

À suivre dans l'édition du samedi.

Partie 3 : Un nouveau modèle économique via les zones économiques spéciales

Je propose la création de « zones économiques spéciales » destinées à accueillir les réfugiés et les migrants en tant que « travailleurs migrants temporaires », leur résidence étant limitée à ces zones désignées.

Ce cadre présente un double avantage : les pays développés s’assurent une main-d’œuvre à bas coût pour stimuler leur croissance économique, tandis que les migrants bénéficient du respect de leur dignité, d’un emploi stable et d’un accès gratuit au logement, à l’alimentation, aux soins de santé et à l’éducation.

Projet mondial de zones spéciales n° 2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Opinion de Nagano n° 1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Pour plus de détails sur les parties 4 à 10, veuillez consulter l’édition du dimanche.

Yasuhiro Nagano

To President Trump! August 2, 2026 "The Rome Statute and the Vienna Convention share the same Article 34, making them almost like twins, but their character is extremely strict."** [A Strange Coincidence—The Commonality of "Article 34"] The Rome Statute and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, while inheriting the structure of the international legal system, stipulate the principles concerning third states in the same number, "Article 34." Since the ICC Rome Statute is also a "treaty," it must be subject to the general principles of treaty law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

 To President Trump!

2026ns9月14日 [Proposal of the Day] Focusing on the curious coincidence that both the Rome Statute and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties rely on "Article 34" as the common article number governing principles regarding third states amidst the intense controversy surrounding the legal jurisdiction of the International Crimi-nal Court (ICC) over non-member states and their nationals, this proposal calls for strictly discerning legal justice and correcting the distortions in the international legal order. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1 [Introduction—Time to Know the Truth] A fierce controversy has erupted surround-ing the legal jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) over non-member states and their nationals. Both the ICC side and President Trump's side rely on the exact same article number, "Article 34." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2 [A Curious Coincidence—The Commonality of "Article 34"] The Rome Statute and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, in inheriting the structural framework of the international legal system, both stipulate principles concerning third states un-der the identical article number, "Article 34." As the ICC Rome Statute is also a "treaty," it must be subject to the general rules of treaty law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3 [The Phase of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties] Concluded in 1969, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties serves as the fundamental law, akin to a constitution for all international treaties worldwide. Its Article 34 establishes the root of international law: "A treaty does not create either obligations or rights for a third State without its consent." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4 [The Content of the "Absolute Principle" of International Law] The principle signi-fied by Article 34 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties is extremely clear. Namely, "a treaty binds only within the scope consented to by the contracting par-ties," "no obligations can be imposed on non-member states," and "obligations do not extend to the nationals of non-member states." This constitutes the absolute princi-ple supporting the stability of international order. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5 [Definition of Article 34 of the Rome Statute] Article 34 of the Rome Statute, the founding document of the ICC, directly incorporates this major principle of interna-tional law. Therefore, the ICC Statute cannot exist independently of the structure and principles of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and it is strictly con-strained by them. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6 [Lack of Legal Effect on Non-Member States] Following this principle, ICC non-member states such as the United States are not bound by the Rome Statute. The ICC cannot impose direct legal obligations on nationals of non-member states, and lacking the explicit consent of those states, it has no authority to investigate or pros-ecute their nationals. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7 [Structural Background of the Treaty System] The Rome Statute was modeled after the framework of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to maintain coher-ence within the international legal order. All treaties should be interpreted based on the rules of treaty law, and their interpretation must not be distorted for the conven-ience of any specific organization. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8 [Limits of Authority Faced by the ICC] Due to the existence of the principle in Arti-cle 34, there are clear limits to the ICC's authority. It should be impermissible under international law for the ICC to unilaterally impose "obligations to cooperate with in-vestigations," "obligations to arrest and extradite suspects," or "obligations to submit evidence" upon non-member states. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9 [The Principle of Non-Exercise of Authority Against Non-Member States] Exercising direct jurisdiction by the ICC over major countries that have not joined the Rome Statute—such as the United States, Israel, and Russia—is legally contradictory. This is the fundamental principle of international law defining state sovereignty and the relative effect of treaties. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10 [The ICC's Deployment of "Exception Theories"] In reality, however, the ICC in-troduces "exceptions" in its investigations against non-member states to assert juris-diction. Representative examples include applying "territorial jurisdiction" on the grounds that a crime occurred within the territory of a member state, or utilizing "ad hoc declarations" independently made by non-member states. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11 [Direct Clash Between Exception Theories and Article 34] These exceptions as-serted by the ICC directly clash with the principle of Article 34 of the Vienna Conven-tion on the Law of Treaties. Even if an event occurs within a member state, entan-gling nationals of non-member states to impose obligations or disadvantages upon them violates the principle that treaties do not prejudice third parties. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

12 [The Inherent Contradiction of Ad Hoc Declarations] Ad hoc declarations by non-member states are based merely on those countries' own political and temporary judgments, differing in nature from universal treaty consent across the entire inter-national community. Expanding obligations to individuals of third-state nationalities based on such declarations is tantamount to evading the system of treaty law. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

13 [The Legitimacy of U.S. Criticism] Viewed from this perspective, the ICC's excep-tion theories effectively hollow out the principle of Article 34, and it must be said that U.S. legal criticism is an extremely legitimate argument from the viewpoint of the in-ternational legal order. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14 [To Correct the Distortions of the International Legal Order] The current operation of the ICC, which broadly interprets formal exceptions to pressure non-member states, carries the danger of undermining the stability of international law. It is time to return to the rule of law and strictly review the scope of application of the rules. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15 [Concluding Remarks] Do not be misled by superficial information circulated by the media and certain commentators. In light of the spirit of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention—the fundamental principle of international law—we must discern legal justice based on calm and objective facts. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_the_Law_of_Treaties

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (English)

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.

Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗 内閣総理大臣 2026年7月27日 「おお第34条よ、汝はなぜ34条なのだ？」 ──ロミオもジュリエットも驚く“条文番号の運命的一致”。 国際刑事裁判所（ICC）と非加盟国・国民の法的管轄権を巡る激しい論争の中で、双方の拠り所であるローマ規程とウィーン条約法条約の双方が「第34条」を共通の条文番号として第三国に関する原則を定めている奇妙な一致に着目し、国際法の基本原則とICCの権限の限界について厳格に法的正義を見極め、国際法秩序の歪みを正す重要性を提案する。（長野恭博）

 高市早苗  内閣総理大臣

2026年9月14日【今日の提案】国際刑事裁判所（ICC）と非加盟国・国民の法的管轄権を巡る激しい論争の中で、双方の拠り所であるローマ規程とウィーン条約法条約の双方が「第34条」を共通の条文番号として第三国に関する原則を定めている奇妙な一致に着目し、国際法の基本原則とICCの権限の限界について厳格に法的正義を見極め、国際法秩序の歪みを正す重要性を提案する。（長野恭博）

1 【はじめに——真実を知るべき時】国際刑事裁判所（ICC）と非加盟国・国民の法的管轄権を巡り、激しい論争が起きています。ICC側とトランプ氏側の双方が拠り所とする条文番号は「34条」で完全に一致しています。（長野恭博）

2 【奇妙の一致——「第34条」の共通性】ローマ規程とウィーン条約法条約は、国際法体系の構造を継承する中で「第34条」という同一の番号において第三国に関する原則を規定しています。ICCローマ規程もまた一つの「条約」である以上、条約法の一般原則に服さなければなりません。（長野恭博）

3 【ウィーン条約法条約の位相】1969年に締結された「条約法に関するウィーン条約」は、世界のすべての国際条約の憲法とも言える基本法です。その第34条は「条約は第三国に対して義務も権利も生じさせない」という国際法の根幹を定めています。（長野恭博）

4 【国際法の“絶対原則”の内容】ウィーン条約法条約第34条が意味する原則は極めて明確です。すなわち、「条約は締約国の同意した範囲のみを拘束する」「未加盟国にはいかなる義務も課せない」「未加盟国の国民にも義務は及ばない」というものであり、これが国際秩序の安定を支える絶対原則です。（長野恭博）

5 【ローマ規程第34条の定義】ICCの根拠法であるローマ規程の第34条も、この国際法上の大原則をそのまま取り込んでいます。したがって、ICC規程もウィーン条約法条約の構造や原則から独立して存在することはできず、その制約を厳格に受ける構造となっています。（長野恭博）

6 【未加盟国に対する法的効果の欠如】この原則論に従えば、米国などのICC非加盟国はローマ規程に拘束されません。ICCは非加盟国の国民に対して直接的な法的義務を課すことはできず、当該国の明確な同意がない限り、その国民を捜査・訴追する権限を持つことはできません。（長野恭博）

7 【条約体系の構造的背景】ローマ規程がウィーン条約法条約の体系を踏襲して作られたのは、国際法秩序における整合性を保つためです。すべての条約は条約法のルールに基づいて解釈されるべきであり、特定の機関の都合でその解釈が歪められてはなりません。（長野恭博）

8 【ICCが直面する権限の限界】第34条の原則が存在するゆえに、ICCの権限には明確な限界があります。ICCは未加盟国に対して「捜査に協力する義務」「容疑者の逮捕・引き渡し義務」「証拠の提出義務」などを一方的に課すことは国際法上許されないはずです。（長野恭博）

9 【未加盟国に対する権限不行使の原則】米国、イスラエル、ロシアなど、ローマ規程に加盟していない主要国に対して、ICCが直接管轄権を行使することは法理的に矛盾しています。これが、国家主権と条約の相対効を定めた国際法の基本原則です。（長野恭博）

10 【ICCによる「例外論」の展開】しかし現実のICCは、非加盟国に対する捜査において「例外」を持ち出し、管轄権を主張しています。その代表例が、犯罪が加盟国の領域内で発生したとする「領域管轄」の適用や、非加盟国が独自に行う「ad hoc（臨時の）宣言」の利用です。（長野恭博）

11 【例外論と第34条の正面衝突】これらICCの主張する例外は、ウィーン条約法条約第34条の原則と真っ向から衝突します。加盟国内での出来事であっても、そこに未加盟国の国民を巻き込んで義務や不利益を課すことは、第三国条約不利益の原則に反しています。（長野恭博）

12 【ad hoc宣言の本質的矛盾】非加盟国によるad hoc宣言は、あくまでその国自身の政治的・一時的な判断によるものであり、国際社会全体の普遍的な条約同意とは性質が異なります。これを根拠に第三国籍の個人へ義務を拡張することは、条約法の体系を潜脱する行為に等しいと言えます。（長野恭博）

13 【米国の批判の正当性】こうした観点から見れば、ICCの例外論は第34条の原則を事実上骨抜きにするものであり、米国の法的批判は国際法秩序の観点から見て極めて正当な主張であると言わざるを得ません。（長野恭博）

14 【国際法秩序の歪みを正すために】形式的な例外規定を拡大解釈して未加盟国に圧力をかける現在のICCの運用は、国際法の安定性を損なう危険性を孕んでいます。法治の原則に立ち返り、ルールの適用範囲を厳格に見直すべき時が来ています。（長野恭博）

15 【結びに代えて】メディアや一部の評論家が流す表層的な情報に惑わされてはなりません。国際法の基本原則であるウィーン条約第34条の精神に照らし、冷静かつ客観的な事実に基づいて法的正義を見極める必要があります。（長野恭博）

パート1 関係URL

条約法のルールに関するウィーン条約

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_the_Law_of_Treaties

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本語）

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

日本の司法制度および入管行政には、国際社会の基準から見ても極めて重大な人権侵害の疑いがあります。私は自身の経験を通じて、日本の「法治国家」としてのあり方に強い疑問を投げかけます。

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋： 私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末： リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2009年： 経営環境の悪化により、やむを得ず該当の中国人学生の雇用を取り消しました。そのため、彼らは卒業後も学生時代からのアルバイト（飲食店）を継続せざるを得なくなりました。

2010年5月： この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月： 私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理： 検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

当時の入管法第22条の4第4号の規定では、虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を得た場合、法務大臣は「行政処分」としてその資格を取り消すことができると定めているに過ぎません。つまり、虚偽書類の提出そのものは、刑罰の対象となる「犯罪」とは規定されていません。犯罪ではない行為を「幇助」したという理屈は、法的に成立しません。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同： 入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

正犯なき幇助の矛盾： 彼らが働いていた飲食店の雇用主は、入管法第73条の2（不法就労助長罪）で処罰されていません。正犯（実際の雇用主）が処罰されていない以上、法の下の平等の原則に照らし、私たちが処罰されるのは法理的に異常です。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

先進国にとっては低賃金労働力の確保による経済成長、移民にとっては衣食住・医療・教育が無料で保障された人間らしい生活の場となります。双方にメリットのある現実的な解決策です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump: August 2, 2026 The way Japanese conservatives are captivated by European ideals is like a night where one is drawn—almost against one's will—to the scent of European perfume, even while glancing sideways at one's true love (the United States). [The Growing Trend of "Anti-American, Pro-European" Sentiment in Japan] In recent years, an "anti-American, pro-European" stance has been gaining strength within Japanese society and among conservatives; this attitude involves keeping the U.S. at arm's length while harboring an excessive affinity for European values ​​and political systems. (Yasuhiro Nagano) [Modern Japanese Conservative Discourse Leaning Toward European Ideals] Contemporary Japanese conservatives have effectively shifted toward a "pro-European" stance; by supporting the ICC, they reject the U.S. position on sovereignty, and regarding policy on Ukraine, they prioritize European ideals over those of the United States. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

 To President Trump

September 13, 2026 [Proposal of the Day] Today's Japanese conservative faction os-tensibly champions a "pro-US" stance while practically tilting toward European inter-national law ideals, a dangerous sign reminiscent of the historical mistakes of the 1930s. Cutting off blind obedience to European ideals and establishing a realist, mul-tipolar stable order through the realization of the G3MA-GPA concept is an urgent ne-cessity. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1.【ICC President Akane's Appeal and Japanese Media Bias】ICC President Tomoko Akane appealed that sanctions against her shake the "rule of law," and Japanese media are filled with arguments regarding the "tyranny of the Trump administration." (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2.【The Vienna Convention Principles Claimed by the US】Based on Article 34 of the Convention—which prohibits imposing obligations on third states without consent—the US argues that the infringement of sovereign rights of non-member states cannot be tolerated, holding legal validity. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3.【Conflict Between International Organization Constitutive Treaties and General In-ternational Law】The logic of Ms. Akane and ICC supporters is based on a special in-stitutional establishment treaty, differing in dimension from the US logic that priori-tizes the Vienna Convention as general law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4.【The Prominent Trend of "Anti-US, Pro-Europe" Spreading in Japan】In recent years, a stance of "anti-US, pro-Europe"—distancing from the US while feeling affinity and admiration for European culture, political systems, and values—has grown prom-inent among Japanese society and conservatives. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5.【Modern Japanese Conservative Critics Tilting Toward European Ideals】Current Japanese conservatives have practically tilted toward "pro-Europe," denying US sov-ereignty arguments through ICC support and prioritizing European ideals over the US in Ukraine policy. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6.【Historical Similarity to the Japan-Germany-Italy Military Alliance of the 1930s】The structure of chasing European ideals today is strikingly similar to the 1930s, when Japan grew disillusioned with the League of Nations, became enchanted by Eu-rope's new order, and rushed toward ruin. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7.【The Dangerous Structure of Following the European International Law Order】Minimizing US realism and comprehensively following the European international law order risks leading Japan back into diplomatic isolation and a dangerous direction. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8.【The G3MA Concept Advocated from the Perspective of Orthodox Conservatism】From the standpoint of orthodox conservatism, I propose the G3MA concept as a se-curity framework based on realism to halt excessive inclination toward European ide-als. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9.【The Roles of G3MA and GPA Emphasizing Realism】G3MA is a realist military equilibrium alliance, and GPA is an order respecting the sovereignty and exclusively defense-oriented posture of each nation, standing apart from European ideal-first or-ders. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10.【US Conservative Anti-China/Russia Sentiments and Significance of My Concept】Accepting G3MA is not easy for US conservatives who strongly oppose China and Russia, but it is gradually being understood as an essential exit strategy to reduce the US burden. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11.【Constructing an International Order Based on Realism, Not Ideals】The interna-tional order should be built on strict realism rather than empty ideals, and G3MA is the best solution to prevent global instability. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12.【The Need to Stop the Runaway "Pro-Europeanization" of Japanese Conserva-tives】Preventing Japanese conservatives from Europeanizing and heading down a dangerous path requires an immediate shift toward realism via the G3MA-GPA model. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13.【The Distortion of Japan's Security Exposed by the ICC Incident】The recent commotion surrounding ICC President Akane highlighted how much the Japanese conservative faction misjudges the real international law order and gets dragged into European logic. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14.【Maintaining the Alliance with the US While Distancing from European Ideals】While firmly maintaining the alliance axis with the US, Japan must regain a mature diplomatic stance that swiftly distances itself from European ideological spells. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

15.【Request for Broad Approval of the Realist International Order Proposal】My pro-posal is a realist international order plan to stop Japan's drift, and I strongly request powerful approval from people worldwide who desire true peace and stability. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

ICC President Tomoko Akane: "Japan should dialogue with the US" – Sanctions shake the "rule of law," she appeals in telephone press conference

https://www.sankei.com/article/20260824-AC7OICFWPVKAHCCKGKAHEMXU4U/?601006&_gl=1

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano(Japanese)

3. Sunday Edition (Dysfunction of Domestic Institutions and Global Recommendations - Chapters 7-8)

Part 2: Immigration Law Violation Cases, Sunday Edition

Chapter 7: When I was released from prison after completing my sentence, I read the newspaper and found out that a similar incident had occurred at the Philippine Embassy.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

Philippine diplomats, embassy staff, and Filipino drivers have suffered the same damage as me.

I have also filed a criminal accusation against this case.

I and the Chinese in the 2010 immigration law violation case, and the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomats in 2013, were punished for the same reason.

I have submitted my complaint and the complaints of the Chinese and Filipinos to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office, the Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office, and the Supreme Public Prosecutors Office.

However, all of them were rejected. If the prosecutor accepts and rejects the case, I can request the Prosecutor's Review Board to prosecute, but I have no way to oppose the rejection.

I also appealed to political parties and Diet members. But they were all ignored.

A city council member accompanied me to the Democratic Party's legal advisor. However, the advisor's answer was that if the "principal offense" is found guilty, then the "crime of aiding and abetting" is established. Is he really a lawyer?

The Democratic Party's legal advisor says that all those who graduated from the Legal Training and Research Institute have the same answer. This is proof that Japan is not "governed under the law".

I asked the Japan Bar Association for support. They said that the JFBA does not have the "power" to solve the problem. Japan's "judicial system" is crazy.

I have "emailed" "political parties and Diet members", as well as "the Prime Minister's Office and the Human Rights Bureau" on "Facebook and (X)", but they are still ignoring me.

This case is an arbitrary misapplication of the law by police officers, prosecutors, and judges. (It is an illegal act).

The charges are "Abuse of the authority of a special public official" and "Crimes of False Complaints".

In my "personal opinion," the prosecutors "concealed" the "criminal complaint" and "criminal accusation" by their "authority." Therefore, the "statute of limitations" has been suspended.

"Chapter 8." This case is "legally" an "error in the application of law."

"Errors in the application of law" are not subject to "requests for retrial" under the "Criminal Procedure Law."

However, if the "crime of the inspectors and police officers involved in the case" is "proven," a request for retrial can be made.

1. The charge against the "special public officials" in this case is "abuse of the authority of special public officials."

They "arrested" us even though there was "no suspicion of a crime." And they even "detained" us. (There is a precedent for grand jury decisions.)

2. And it is "the crime of false accusation." It is a fact that they "indicted" us and even found us guilty in a "trial" in order to make us criminals.

Requests for retrial can be made by us or by the prosecutors.

I believe that the prosecution should admit guilt and make a request for a retrial.

I will not give up. It has been 15 years since the incident.

The only country that can resolve this case is the United States.

When Trump was the former president, he promised me.

He replied with a signed letter saying, "I will resolve this in a way that satisfies you."

I hope that this time he will keep his promise.

President Trump, let's work together to "revive the Rust Belt" and create a "special zone on the Mexican border."

And let's cross the Caribbean Sea to the Pacific Ocean in two hours with the "American Linear Canal Railway," a freight train dedicated to containers that will replenish the Panama Canal.

People around the world, please support us.

Part 3. Construction of a special zone. It's a new business model.

No2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

No1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

Part 4. "US-Russia-China" three-nation military alliance and war show

No2: https://urc-military.seesaa.net/

No1: https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

Part 5. Ukraine War

No2: https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/

No1: https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

Part 6. Japan's infamous judicial system and human rights violations

No2: https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/

No1: https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

Part 7. Development of virus detectors for coronavirus and other viruses

https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

Part 8. North Korea's abduction and missile issues

https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

Part 9. One Coin Union & Hydrogen Vehicle Promotion

https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

Part 10. Nagano Opinion, Next Generation Nuclear Power Plant: CO2 Free & SDGs

https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

長野恭博 オピニオン 2026年8月2日 ICC支持に酔ってる日本の保守、まるで“ワインの香りに溺れて翌朝ベッドで後悔するタイプの恋”だ。 【ICC赤根所長の訴えと日本メディアの偏向】ICCの赤根智子所長は米国の制裁が法の支配を揺るがすと訴え、日本のメディアはトランプ政権の横暴論で埋め尽くされている。（Yasuhiro Nagano) 2.【米国が主張するウィーン条約法条約の原則】米国は第三国に義務を課せない同条約第34条を根拠に、非加盟国の主権的権利の侵害は認められないと主張しており、法理的には正当性がある。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

 トランプ大統領　へ

2026年9月13日【今日の提案】：今の日本の保守層は「親米」を掲げながら実質的に欧州の国際法理念へ傾倒しており、1930年代の歴史的過ちの再来を彷彿とさせる危険な兆候にある。欧州理念への盲従を断ち切り、現実主義の多極安定秩序を確立するためにも、G3MA・GPA構想の実現が急務である。（Yasuhiro Nagano）

1.【ICC赤根所長の訴えと日本メディアの偏向】ICCの赤根智子所長は米国の制裁が法の支配を揺るがすと訴え、日本のメディアはトランプ政権の横暴論で埋め尽くされている。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

2.【米国が主張するウィーン条約法条約の原則】米国は第三国に義務を課せない同条約第34条を根拠に、非加盟国の主権的権利の侵害は認められないと主張しており、法理的には正当性がある。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

3.【国際機関の設立条約と一般国際法の対立】赤根氏やICC支持派の論理は特殊な機関設立条約に基づくものであり、一般法であるウィーン条約を優先する米国の論理とは次元が異なる。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

4.【日本国内に広がる「嫌米親欧」の顕著な傾向】近年の日本社会や保守層の間では、米国に距離を置きつつ欧州の価値観や政治体制に過度な親近感を抱く「嫌米親欧」の姿勢が強まっている。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

5.【欧州理念に傾倒する現代日本の保守論壇】現在の日本の保守は実質的に「親欧」へ傾き、ICC支持を通じて米国の主権論を否定し、ウクライナ政策でも欧州の理念を米国より優先している。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

6.【1930年代の日独伊軍事同盟への歴史的類似】国際連盟に失望し欧州の新秩序に魅了されて破滅へ向かった1930年代の歴史と、現在の欧州理念追随の構造は驚くほど酷似している。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

7.【欧州の国際法秩序に追随する危うい構造】米国の現実主義を軽視して欧州の国際法秩序に全面的に追随することは、日本を再び外交的孤立と危険な方向へと導く恐れがある。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

8.【正統派保守の立場から提唱するG3MA構想】私は正統派保守の立場から、欧州理念への過度な傾斜を食い止め、現実主義に基づく安全保障枠組みとしてG3MA構想を提唱している。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

9.【現実主義を重視するG3MAとGPAの役割】G3MAは現実主義の軍事均衡同盟であり、GPAは各国の主権と専守防衛を尊重する秩序であり、欧州の理念先行型とは一線を画す。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

10.【米国保守層の対中露感情と私の構想の意義】反中・反ロが強い米国の保守層にとってG3MAの受け入れは容易ではないが、米国の負担を減らす不可欠な出口戦略として徐々に理解され始めている。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

11.【理念ではなく現実主義に基づく国際秩序の構築】国際秩序は空虚な理念ではなく厳格な現実主義で構築されるべきであり、G3MAは世界の不安定化を防ぐための最善の解決策である。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

12.【親欧化する日本保守の暴走を止める必要性】日本の保守が欧州化して危険な道に進むのを防ぐためにも、G3MA・GPAモデルによる現実主義への舵取りが急務となっている。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

13.【ICC事件が露呈させた日本の安全保障の歪み】今回のICC赤根所長を巡る騒動は、日本の保守層がいかに現実の国際法秩序を見誤り、欧州の論理に引きずられているかを浮き彫りにした。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

14.【米国との同盟維持と欧州理念からの距離確保】日本は米国との強固な同盟基軸を堅持しつつ、欧州の理念的呪縛から速やかに距離を置く大人の外交スタンスを取り戻さなければならない。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

15.【現実主義の国際秩序案への幅広い賛同の要請】私の構想は日本の迷走を止める現実主義の国際秩序案であり、真の平和と安定を望む世界中の人々に力強い賛同を強く求めたい。（Yasuhiro Nagano)

パート1 関係URL

ICC赤根智子所長「日本は米国と対話を」 制裁は「法の支配」揺るがす、電話会見で訴え

https://www.sankei.com/article/20260824-AC7OICFWPVKAHCCKGKAHEMXU4U/?601006&_gl=1

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本人）

3. 日曜版（国内機関の機能不全とグローバル提言・第7章〜第8章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【日曜版】

【第7章】国内の救済手続きにおける機能不全

刑期満了による釈放後、私は2013年にフィリピン大使館関係者が私と全く同じ構図の不当な摘発（入管法違反）に遭っていることを知りました。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

私はこの構造的冤罪を正すため、東京地方検察庁、東京高等検察庁、最高検察庁に対して「告訴状」および「告発状」を提出しました。しかし、検察はこれらをすべて「不受理」という形で門前払いしました。「不起訴」であれば検察審査会へ不服を申し立てる道がありますが、「不受理」にすることで、法的に対抗する手段すら奪われたのです。

また、政党や国会議員、弁護士会（日弁連）にもこの司法の歪みを訴えましたが、保身や知識不足からか、すべて無視または拒絶されました。大手政党の顧問弁護士ですら「正犯が有罪なら幇助も成立する」という思考停止の回答に終始し、日本の法秩序の崩壊を痛感せざるを得ませんでした。

検察・警察・裁判所によるこの一連の行為は、「特別公務員職権乱用罪」および「虚偽告訴罪」に該当する不法行為です。検察が職権でこれらの告訴・告発を隠蔽し続けているため、時効のカウントは停止していると解釈すべきです。

【第8章】再審請求への意志とアメリカへの期待

刑事訴訟法上、単なる「適用法の誤り」は再審請求の理由から除外されています。しかし、当時の捜査・裁判に関わった「公務員の犯罪」が立証されれば、再審の扉は開かれます。根拠なき不当逮捕（職権乱用）と、無実の者を罪人に仕立て上げた罪（虚偽告訴）を追及し、検察自らが非を認めて再審請求を行うべきです。事件から15年が経過しましたが、私は決して諦めません。

この日本の閉鎖的な司法システムを打破できる外部の力は、米国をおいて他にありません。トランプ氏は前大統領在任時、私に対し「満足のいく方法で解決する」との趣旨の署名入り返信をくれました。私はこの約束の実現を強く期待しています。

【トランプ大統領への共同提案】

ラストベルト（製造業地帯）の復活、およびメキシコ国境への「特別地帯」の建設を共に進めましょう。さらに、パナマ運河を補完するコンテナ専用の高速貨物鉄道「アメリカ・リニア運河鉄道」を敷設し、カリブ海から太平洋をわずか2時間で横断する新物流ルートを構築しましょう。

世界の皆様の、温かいご支援とご注目をお願いいたします。

第3部以降：各プロジェクトへのリンク

第3部：特別地帯の建設（新しいビジネスモデル）

No2：https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

No1：https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

第4部：「米ロ中」3国軍事同盟・戦争ショー

No2：https://urc-military.seesaa.net/

No1：https://sangokugunzidoumei.blog.jp//

第5部：ウクライナ戦争

No2：https://ukrainawar.seesaa.net/

No1：https://ukrainian-war.blog.jp/

第6部：悪名高い日本の司法制度・人権侵害

No2：https://nipponsihou.seesaa.net/

No1：https://humanrightsopinion.blog.jp/

第7部：コロナなどのウイルス感知器開発

https://covid-19-sensor.seesaa.net/

第8部：北朝鮮の拉致・ミサイル問題

https://taiwan-defense.seesaa.net/

第9部：ワンコインユニオン＆水素自動車の推進

https://onecoinunion.seesaa.net/

第10部：次世代原発（CO2フリー）＆ SDGs

https://naganoopinion.seesaa.net/

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump — September 12, 2026 [The Universal Principle of Article 34 Underpinning the U.S. Position] Citing Article 34 (which prohibits the imposition of obligations on third states without their consent), the United States has consistently maintained that international organizations must not infringe upon the sovereign rights of non-member states. (Yasuhiro Nagano) [The Primacy of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in the International Legal Order] The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties serves as the rulebook of general law governing the conclusion and legal effect of treaties between states; its provisions hold the highest priority within the legal order of the international community. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

 To President Trump　

September 12, 2026 [Proposal of the Day] It lacks an understanding of the rule of law when some of Japan's conservative critics ignore the principles of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties under international law to criticize US sanctions against ICC President Akane. The Trump administration should demand strict the rule of law from the Japanese government regarding the unjust treatment of former Nis-san Representative Director Greg Kelly and win his acquittal. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1.【Flawed US Criticisms by Japan's Conservative Commentators】Conservative heavyweights such as Terumasa Nakanishi have condemned Prime Minister Takaichi for failing to protect ICC President Tomoko Akane, but such defenses ignoring legal order are utterly shameful. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2.【Secretary of State Rubio's Statement on National Sovereignty】Secretary of State Rubio clearly stated that attacks on national sovereignty will not be tolerated, and Prime Minister Takaichi has also been busy explaining her outreach efforts to the US. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3.【International Law Interpretations That Japanese People Struggle With】The es-sence of this issue is the interpretation of international law, and Japanese people should calmly understand the fact that the US imposed sanctions on President Akane based on the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4.【The Superiority of the Vienna Convention in International Law Order】The Vienna Convention is the general rulebook governing how treaties between states are con-cluded and their effects, and it is a provision that should be given top priority in the legal order of the international community. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5.【Role as a Standard Guaranteeing Governance Under the Law】The Vienna Con-vention serves as the benchmark when nations conclude new treaties, and disregard-ing it would completely collapse governance under the law within the international community. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6.【The Universal Principle of Article 34 Valued by the US】Based on Article 34 (im-posing no obligations on third states without consent), the US consistently asserts that international organizations are not permitted to infringe upon the sovereign rights of non-member states. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7.【The Interpretation of the Rome Statute Claimed by the ICC Side】Conversely, ICC supporters deploy a unique interpretive argument that the Rome Statute is exer-cised within the scope of member states' jurisdiction and does not constitute a treaty violation. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8.【The Conflict and Structural Opposition of Different Legal Norms】Both are differ-ent legal dimensions—"general treaty rules" and "the mechanisms of individual inter-national institutions"—and it is clear that the Trump administration did not bend the law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9.【The Folly of University Professors Ignoring the Vienna Convention】The stance of university professors shouting in defense of President Akane while ignoring the Vien-na Convention, a fundamental principle of international law, must be called a shame-ful display lacking intellectual integrity. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10.【The Fatal Deficiency in Legal Understanding Common Among Japanese Citizens】Just as my 2010 Immigration Control Act case involved indictments ignoring the Con-stitution, the Japanese people harbor a defect in failing to understand proper govern-ance and acts under the law. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11.【Lessons from the Rescue of Americans Involved in the Nissan Case】By snatch-ing back the American father and son who aided Carlos Ghosn's escape from Japan and setting them free, the Biden administration maintained legal logic and protected America's honor and citizens. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12.【The Tragedy of Former Representative Director Greg Kelly Awaiting Supreme Court Appeal】Former Representative Director Kelly suffers from unjust detention and trials while appealing to the Supreme Court, serving as a breeding ground allowing the Japanese government to do as it pleases. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13.【Legal Demands the Trump Administration Should Make Upon Japan】President Trump should not abandon Mr. Kelly, but strongly demand true "governance under the law" from the Japanese government and immediately secure his acquittal. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

14.【The Shift from Pro-US to Pro-Europe and the Wandering of Conservatism】Amidst rapid changes in the definition of Japanese conservatism and the shaking of the pro-Euro-American axis, rather than getting intoxicated by Armageddon, a major diplomatic pivot returning to the origins of the rule of law is necessary. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

15.【Establishing International Law Order Aimed at by True Conservatives】Discarding emotional arguments and favoritism, rebuilding a sound world order based on strict international law and the rule of law is precisely what is most demanded of Japanese conservatives now. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 References

"Can Prime Minister Takaichi be called a conservative without protecting ICC Presi-dent Tomoko Akane?" Terumasa Nakanishi, professor emeritus at Kyoto University and a heavy figure in conservative criticism, bluntly states, "Now is the golden oppor-tunity to review diplomacy toward the US"

https://www.news-postseven.com/archives/20260828_2128528.html/2

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

2. Saturday Edition (土曜版)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Saturday Edition]

For the case overview (Chapters 1 and 2), please refer to the Weekday Edition.

Throughout this unjust trial, I consistently maintained my innocence based on rigorous legal logic. However, the police and prosecution ignored my arguments, attempting to coerce a confession based on arbitrary generalizations.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 3] Appeals to the International Community and Legal Contradictions

Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan guarantees due process, stating that no person shall be deprived of life or liberty except according to procedure established by law (the principle of legality). Yet, the prosecution in this case forcefully misapplied administrative provisions to fit the Penal Code’s definition of aiding and abetting. This demonstrates a severe lack of legal competence and constitutes an abuse of official authority.

Following our case in 2010 and a nearly identical incident involving Philippine Embassy staff in 2013, international criticism intensified against Japan's arbitrary enforcement of the law.

Consequently, the Japanese government amended the Immigration Control Act in December 2016 (effective January 2017) to explicitly criminalize the act of "providing false employment contracts."

This statutory amendment is irrefutable proof that no such crime existed under the previous law when we were charged, meaning we were entirely innocent. Article 39 of the Constitution strictly prohibits retroactive punishment (ex post facto laws). Despite this clear legal reality, the government has offered no apology, restoration of honor, or compensation.

[Chapter 4] Supporting Legal Documents

The official indictment and the validity of my legal arguments are publicly accessible through the following documents (available in Japanese and English):

Official Indictment (JA/EN)

http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

My Legal Argument (Japanese)

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98

My Legal Argument (English)

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

[Chapter 5] Petitions to International Organizations

Following my release, I sought redress from foreign embassies in Japan, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and the International Criminal Court (ICC).

An ambassador from an African nation advised me that while diplomatic ties prevented an official state protest, they could engage networks within the ICC. I believe this international pressure ultimately forced the 2016 statutory amendment.

The number of foreign nationals—including Chinese, Korean, Filipino, and American citizens—who fall victim to such arbitrary legal interpretations in Japan is estimated to be in the tens or hundreds of thousands. This is an alarming crisis that the international community cannot ignore.

Continued in the Sunday Edition.

Part 3: Special Economic Zones (Business Model)

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

*Please refer to the "Sunday Edition" for Parts 4 through 10.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

長野恭博 オピニオン 2026年9月12日 日本の一部保守論壇が国際法上の「ウィーン条約法条約」の原則を無視してICC赤根所長への米国の制裁を批判するのは法治の理解を欠いている。トランプ政権は日産事件のグレッグ・ケリー元代表取締役の不当な扱いに対し、日本政府へ厳格な法の支配を要求し無罪解放を勝ち取るべきである。（Yasuhiro Nagano） 【日本保守論壇の間違った対米批判】中西輝政氏をはじめとする保守論壇の重鎮が、高市首相がICC赤根智子所長を守らなかったことを非難しているが、法秩序を無視した擁護は極めて恥ずかしい。(長野恭博）

 長野恭博　オピニオン

2026年9月12日【今日の提案】：日本の一部保守論壇が国際法上の「ウィーン条約法条約」の原則を無視してICC赤根所長への米国の制裁を批判するのは法治の理解を欠いている。トランプ政権は日産事件のグレッグ・ケリー元代表取締役の不当な扱いに対し、日本政府へ厳格な法の支配を要求し無罪解放を勝ち取るべきである。（Yasuhiro Nagano）

1.【日本保守論壇の間違った対米批判】中西輝政氏をはじめとする保守論壇の重鎮が、高市首相がICC赤根智子所長を守らなかったことを非難しているが、法秩序を無視した擁護は極めて恥ずかしい。(長野恭博）

2.【ルビオ国務長官の国家主権に関する声明】ルビオ国務長官は国家主権への攻撃は容認しないと明言しており、高市首相も米国への働きかけについて釈明に追われている。(長野恭博）

3.【日本人が苦手とする国際法の法理解釈】この問題の本質は国際法の解釈であり、米国がウィーン条約法条約を法的根拠として赤根所長に制裁を下した事実を日本人は冷静に理解すべきである。(長野恭博）

4.【国際法秩序におけるウィーン条約法条約の優位性】ウィーン条約法条約は国家間の条約の結び方や効力を律する一般法のルールブックであり、国際社会の法秩序において最優先されるべき規程である。(長野恭博）

5.【法の下の統治を担保する基準としての役割】ウィーン条約法条約は国家が新たな条約を結ぶ際の基準となり、これを軽視すれば国際社会における法の下の統治は完全に崩壊する。(長野恭博）

6.【米国が拠って立つ第34条の普遍的原則】米国は第34条（第三国に同意なく義務を課せない）を根拠に、非加盟国の主権的権利を国際機関が侵すことは許されないと一貫して主張している。(長野恭博）

7.【ICC側が主張するローマ規程の解釈論】一方のICC支持派は、ローマ規程は締約国の管轄権の範囲内で行使されるものであり条約違反には当たらないという独自の解釈論を展開している。(長野恭博）

8.【次元の異なる法規範の対立と対立の構造】両者は「一般的な条約のルール」と「個別の国際機関の仕組み」という異なる法次元であり、トランプ政権が法を曲げたわけではないことは明白である。(長野恭博）

9.【ウィーン条約を無視する大学教授の発言の愚かさ】国際法の基本原則であるウィーン条約を無視して赤根所長擁護を叫ぶ大学教授の姿勢は、知的誠実さを欠いた恥ずべきものと言わざるを得ない。(長野恭博）

10.【日本国民に共通する法治理解の致命的欠如】日本人は2010年の私の入管法事件でも憲法を無視した起訴が行われたように、法の下での適正な統治行為を理解できない欠陥を抱えている。(長野恭博）

11.【日産事件における米国人親子の救出劇の教訓】バイデン政権はゴーン逃亡を手助けした米国人親子を日本から奪い返し無罪放免とすることで、法の論理を貫き米国の名誉と国民を守り抜いた。(長野恭博）

12.【最高裁上告中のグレッグ・ケリー氏の悲劇】ケリー元代表取締役は上告中の身でありながら不当な拘束と裁判に苦しんでおり、日本政府のやりたい放題を許す温床となっている。(長野恭博）

13.【トランプ政権が果たすべき日本への法的要求】トランプ大統領はケリー氏を見捨てることなく、日本政府に対して真の「法の下での統治」を強く要求し直ちに無罪解放させるべきだ。(長野恭博）

14.【親米から親欧への移行と保守の迷走】日本の保守の定義が急変し親欧米の軸が揺らぐ中、ハルマゲドンに浮かれている場合ではなく、法治の原点に立ち返る外交への大転換が必要である。(長野恭博）

15.【真の保守が目指すべき国際法秩序の確立】感情論や身内びいきを排し、厳格な国際法と法の支配に基づいた健全な世界秩序の再構築こそが、いま日本の保守に最も求められている道である。(長野恭博）

パート1 参考文献

「高市首相はICC赤根智子・所長を守らずして保守といえるのか」保守論壇の重鎮、中西輝政・京都大学名誉教授が直言「いまこそ対米外交を見直す好機」

https://www.news-postseven.com/archives/20260828_2128528.html/2

明日また書きます。

長野恭博 (日本人)

2. 土曜版（国際社会への提訴と法改正の矛盾・第3章〜第5章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【土曜版】

※第1章・第2章の事件概要は「平日版」をご覧ください。

私は自身の受けた不当な裁判について、一貫して法的な論理に基づいて無罪を主張してきましたが、警察・検察はそれを無視し、強引に罪を認めさせようとしました。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第3章】国際社会への告発と法改正の事実

日本国憲法第31条は、適正な法律の定める手続きによらなければ刑罰を科せられない（罪刑法定主義）と定めています。しかし、本件で検察が用いた論理は、行政処分である入管法の規定を、刑法の幇助罪へと強引に結びつけたものであり、法的な専門知識を著しく欠いた職権乱用と言わざるを得ません。

実際、私どもの事件（2010年）や、その後のフィリピン大使館関係者の事件（2013年）に対し、国際社会から日本の不当な法運用への批判が高まりました。

その結果、日本政府は2016年12月に入管法を改正（2017年1月施行）し、ようやく「虚偽の雇用契約書を提供する行為」を処罰できる明確な規定を作りました。

この法改正こそが、「それ以前の法律では処罰できなかった（＝私たちは無罪であった）」ことの動かぬ証拠です。憲法第39条は法律の遡及処罰（過去に遡って罪に問うこと）を禁止しています。それにもかかわらず、政府からの謝罪や名誉回復、賠償はいまだに行われていません。

【第4章】証拠資料一式

当時の起訴状や私の主張の正当性は、以下の公開資料（日本語・英語）から客観的にご確認いただけます。

起訴状（日・英）

http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

私の主張（日本語）

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98

私の主張（英語）

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

【第5章】国際機関へのアプローチ

釈放後、私は在日外国大使館や国連人権高等弁務官事務所（OHCHR）、国際刑事裁判所（ICC）へ救済を求めました。

あるアフリカ諸国の大使からは、「政府間の援助関係から表立った抗議は難しいが、ICCのネットワークを通じて動くことはできる」との合理的な助言も得ました。こうした国際的な圧力が、2016年の入管法改正に繋がったと考えています。

日本国内でこのような恣意的な法解釈の犠牲になっている外国人は、中国人、韓国人、フィリピン人、アメリカ人など、数万人から数十万人に上る可能性があります。これは看過できない異常な事態です。

※続きは「日曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特別地帯の建設（ビジネスモデル）

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※第4部〜第10部は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump – September 11, 2026 [The Religious Backdrop Driving U.S. Politics] Underlying this issue is the significant influence that religious communities within the United States exert on the political system—an influence that cannot be overlooked. The political leanings of Evangelical Christians, in particular, have long been a subject of debate. (Yasuhiro Nagano) [Religious Community Demographics and Political Reality] The Jewish population in the U.S. is estimated at approximately 7 million, while the Evangelical population stands at around 60 million; this disparity in population size translates directly into differences in political clout and lobbying power. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

 To President Trump!

September 11, 2026 [Proposal of the Day] Behind America's Iran policy and Middle East interventions lies a deep entanglement with domestic religious communities, particularly the trends and political influence of Evangelicals. There is an urgent need to rebuild the proper distance between politics and religion in a democratic society and establish a transparent decision-making system unswayed by specific factions. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

1.【The Complex Framework of the Iran Situation and American Politics】Discussions surrounding recent affairs in Iran point out that political judgments within the United States heavily influenced outcomes, resulting in severe strategic burdens in the Mid-dle East. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2.【The Deep Wounds Inflicted on America by Strategic Impacts】Past decisions sur-rounding preemptive strikes against Iran left deep strategic scars on America, compa-rable in severity to the failures of the Vietnam War. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3.【The Existence of Religious Backgrounds Driving American Politics】Behind this issue lies the undeniable influence of domestic religious communities on the political system, with Evangelical dynamics having been debated for years. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4.【Population Scale of Religious Communities and Political Reality】In the US, the Jewish population is estimated at about 7 million and Evangelicals at roughly 60 mil-lion, with the disparity in population size directly linked to differences in political voice and lobbying power. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

5.【The Political Structure Intersecting Electoral Strategy and Religious Votes】Behind the Trump administration's strong support for the Israeli right wing lay not only religious conviction but also calculated electoral strategy and religious voting trends. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6.【The Absence of Rival Forces Comparable to Evangelicals】Taking a calm look at the structure of American politics, it is evident that rival forces boasting political influ-ence and organizational strength equivalent to Evangelicals simply do not exist. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

7.【The Rapid Rise of the Nones and Challenges in Political Participation】In recent years, the religiously unaffiliated ("Nones") have surged to about 30% of the US population, yet they still face significant challenges regarding organized political par-ticipation and mobilization power. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8.【Political Divisions Evident Within the Catholic Faction】The Catholic community, numbering around 60 million, is split between Republican and Democratic support, lacking the specific eschatological political emphasis seen among Evangelicals. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

9.【The Moderate Stance of Mainline Protestants】Mainline Protestants, numbering about 30 million, tend to clearly separate politics and religion; while many support the Democratic Party, their mobilization power is not as strong as that of Evangelicals. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10.【The Singular Nature of Jewish Citizens' Political Influence】Though a minority of around 7 million, Jewish citizens wield significant political influence, with their sup-port for Israel driven primarily by political reasons rather than religious motives. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

11.【Shifting Values Among the Younger Generation and Secularization】A drift away from religion is accelerating among Gen Z and Millennials, and the spread of values that do not conflate politics and religion points toward future structural changes in politics. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12.【Generational Shifts Shaking the Relationship Between Religion and Politics】Factors pointing to a future weakening of Evangelical influence include younger gen-erations' changing sense of distance from religious eschatology and their flexible stance toward social issues. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13.【The Complex Relationship Between Religion and Politics in Japanese Politics】The departure of Komeito from its coalition with the Liberal Democratic Party in Octo-ber 2025 and the birth of the Center Reform Alliance served as an opportunity for voters in Japan to confront the relationship between religious organizations and polit-ical parties. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14.【Collusive Structures with Religious Organizations Swaying Voting Behavior】When some voters prioritized ties with religious groups in choosing political parties, it generated unexpected biases in voting behavior and drove specific parties into tight corners. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15.【Proper Distance Between Politics and Religion to Protect Democracy】While freedom of religion must be strictly protected, structures where politics exploits reli-gious organizations must be carefully eliminated, and maintaining an appropriate dis-tance is essential for social stability. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

The cost of defeat in the Iran war exceeds that of the Vietnam War... Trump's mis-calculation left a "deep wound" on America

http://newsweekjapan.jp/articles/-/332341?page=3

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.

Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

高市早苗 内閣総理大臣 2026年9月11日 米国のイラン政策や中東介入の背後には、国内の巨大な宗教コミュニティ、特に福音派の動向と政治的影響力が深く絡み合っている。民主主義国家における政治と宗教の適切な距離を再構築し、特定の勢力に左右されない透明性の高い意思決定システムの確立が急務である。（長野恭博） 【イラン情勢とアメリカ政治の複雑な構図】近年のイラン情勢をめぐる議論では、米国内の政治的判断が大きな影響を及ぼし、中東での過酷な戦略的負担を招いたと指摘されている。（長野恭博）

 高市早苗  内閣総理大臣

2026年9月11日【今日の提案】：米国のイラン政策や中東介入の背後には、国内の巨大な宗教コミュニティ、特に福音派の動向と政治的影響力が深く絡み合っている。民主主義国家における政治と宗教の適切な距離を再構築し、特定の勢力に左右されない透明性の高い意思決定システムの確立が急務である。（長野恭博）

1.【イラン情勢とアメリカ政治の複雑な構図】近年のイラン情勢をめぐる議論では、米国内の政治的判断が大きな影響を及ぼし、中東での過酷な戦略的負担を招いたと指摘されている。（長野恭博）

2.【戦略的影響がもたらしたアメリカの深い傷】イランへの先制攻撃を巡る過去の決断は、かつてのベトナム戦争の失敗と比較されるほどの深刻な戦略的傷跡をアメリカに残した。（長野恭博）

3.【アメリカ政治を動かす宗教的背景の存在】この問題の背景には、米国内の宗教的コミュニティが政治体制に与える看過できない影響力があり、特に福音派の動向が長年議論されている。（長野恭博）

4.【宗教コミュニティの人口規模と政治の現実】米国内ではユダヤ系が約700万人、福音派が約6000万人とされ、その人口規模の差が政治的な発言力やロビー活動の差に直結している。（長野恭博）

5.【選挙戦略と宗教票が交錯する政治構造】トランプ政権がイスラエル右派を強く支持した背景には、宗教的信念だけでなく、選挙戦略上の計算と宗教票の動向が深く関係していた。（長野恭博）

6.【福音派に匹敵する政治的勢力の不在】アメリカ政治の構造を冷静に見つめ直した時、福音派と同等の強大な政治的影響力や組織力を誇る対抗勢力は見当たらないのが実情である。（長野恭博）

7.【急増する無宗教層と政治参加の課題】近年、アメリカでは無宗教層（Nones）が人口の約30％に達して急増しているが、組織的な政治参加や動員力の面では依然として課題を残している。（長野恭博）

8.【カトリック層に見られる政治的分断】約6000万人の規模を持つカトリック層は、共和党支持と民主党支持に二分されており、福音派のような特定の終末論的政治強調は見られない。（長野恭博）

9.【主流派プロテスタントの穏健な立ち位置】約3000万人いる主流派プロテスタントは、政治と宗教を明確に分ける傾向が強く、民主党支持が多いものの動員力は福音派ほど強くない。（長野恭博）

10.【ユダヤ系市民の政治的影響力の特異性】ユダヤ系市民は約700万人と少数ながら大きな政治的影響力を持ち、そのイスラエル支持は宗教的動機よりも政治的理由が中心となっている。（長野恭博）

11.【若者世代の価値観の変化と宗教離れ】Z世代やミレニアル世代の間では宗教離れが加速し、政治と宗教を混同しない価値観が広がることで、将来的な政治構造の変化が予見される。（長野恭博）

12.【宗教と政治の関係性を揺るがす世代交代】福音派の影響力が将来的に弱まる要因として、若者世代が持つ宗教的終末論への距離感や社会問題に対する柔軟な姿勢の変化が挙げられる。（長野恭博）

13.【日本政治における宗教と政治の複雑な関係】2025年10月の公明党の連立離脱と中道改革連合の誕生は、日本国内においても宗教組織と政党の関係性を有権者が直視する契機となった。（長野恭博）

14.【選挙行動を左右する宗教団体との癒着構造】一部の有権者が政党選択において宗教団体との関係を重視した結果、予期せぬ投票行動の偏りを生み、特定の政党を窮地に追い込んだ。（長野恭博）

15.【民主主義を守るための政治と宗教の適正距離】信教の自由は厳格に守られるべきだが、政治が宗教組織を利用する構造は慎重に排除されねばならず、適切な距離の維持が社会の安定に不可欠である。（長野恭博）

パート1 関係URL

イラン戦争敗北の代償はベトナム戦争を超える…トランプの誤算がアメリカに残した「深い傷」

http://newsweekjapan.jp/articles/-/332341?page=3

明日また書きます。

長野恭博（日本人）

1. 平日版（入管法違反事件の論理的矛盾・第1章〜第2章）

第2部：「入管法違反事件」【平日版】

日本の司法制度および入管行政には、国際社会の基準から見ても極めて重大な人権侵害の疑いがあります。私は自身の経験を通じて、日本の「法治国家」としてのあり方に強い疑問を投げかけます。

まずは、2010年に私が「入管法違反幇助（ほうじょ）罪」という冤罪に巻き込まれた経緯についてご一読ください。

詳細な全文はこちら： To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

【第1章】事件の概要

2008年秋： 私が経営する会社は、留学ビザで在留中だった中国人学生との間で、翌春の大学卒業後の採用を約束する「雇用契約書」を交付しました。

2008年末： リーマンショックが発生し、翌年以降のシステム開発案件が次々とキャンセルされました。

2009年： 経営環境の悪化により、やむを得ず該当の中国人学生の雇用を取り消しました。そのため、彼らは卒業後も学生時代からのアルバイト（飲食店）を継続せざるを得なくなりました。

2010年5月： この中国人元学生らが「在留資格外活動（入管法第70条違反）」で逮捕されました。

2010年6月： 私と採用担当者も逮捕されました。容疑は、彼らの資格外活動に対する「刑法上の幇助（手助け）罪」でした。

逮捕の論理： 検察側は、「過去に交付した雇用契約書が虚偽であり、それが結果的に彼らの不法就労を助けた」と主張したのです。

【第2章】判決における法解釈の致命的な誤り

この起訴および判決は、法律の原則を無視した極めて恣意的なものです。

当時の入管法第22条の4第4号の規定では、虚偽の書類を提出して在留資格を得た場合、法務大臣は「行政処分」としてその資格を取り消すことができると定めているに過ぎません。つまり、虚偽書類の提出そのものは、刑罰の対象となる「犯罪」とは規定されていません。犯罪ではない行為を「幇助」したという理屈は、法的に成立しません。

判決の論法は以下のようなものです。

虚偽の雇用契約書で在留資格を取得した。

その資格で日本に在留した。

在留した結果、アルバイト（資格外活動）を行った。

したがって、最初の契約書を出した者が資格外活動を幇助した。

これは「風が吹けば桶屋が儲かる」式の強引な因果関係であり、近代法の論理に完全に反しています。

【私の主張】

行政処分と刑事罰の混同： 入管法は、虚偽書類に対する措置を行政処分（在留資格の取消・強制送還）と定めており、それで手続きは完結します。

正犯なき幇助の矛盾： 彼らが働いていた飲食店の雇用主は、入管法第73条の2（不法就労助長罪）で処罰されていません。正犯（実際の雇用主）が処罰されていない以上、法の下の平等の原則に照らし、私たちが処罰されるのは法理的に異常です。

同様の不当な論理は、のちに外交官や大使館職員に対しても適用されることになります。

※続きは「土曜版」に掲載します。

第3部：特区建設による新たなビジネスモデル

難民や移民を「一時的移民労働者」として受け入れ、居住エリアを限定した「特区」を建設する提言です。

先進国にとっては低賃金労働力の確保による経済成長、移民にとっては衣食住・医療・教育が無料で保障された人間らしい生活の場となります。双方にメリットのある現実的な解決策です。

世界特区構想 NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

長野オピニオン NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

※NO4〜NO10の詳細は「日曜版」をご覧ください。

長野恭博

過去の記事一覧（アーカイブブログ）： To World Media。

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

ご質問等ございましたら、お気軽にお問い合わせください！

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump: September 10, 2026—A Crisis for the United States! Iran’s "de-dollarization" and the wavering of global dollar hegemony represent a grave crisis that threatens U.S. privileges and its economic foundation. To avert a runaway global financial crisis and achieve an orderly soft landing, it is essential to establish a joint management system for a multi-currency financial order led by a U.S.-China-Russia trilateral military alliance (G3MA). (Yasuhiro Nagano) [Iran Warns of Devastating Retaliation Against U.S. Economic Sanctions] In response to the largest economic sanctions ever imposed by the United States, Iran has issued a stern warning that it will carry out devastating retaliation against any new threats. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

 To President Trump!

September 10, 2026 [Proposal of the Day] Iran's "de-dollarization" and the wobbling global dollar hegemony are grave crises shaking America's privileges and economic foundation. To prevent a runaway global financial crisis and achieve an orderly soft landing, building a joint management system for a multi-currency financial order through the US-China-Russia Trilateral Military Alliance (G3MA) is indispensable. (Ya-suhiro Nagano)

1.【Iran's Warning of Devastating Retaliation Against US Economic Sanctions】In re-sponse to the US's largest economic sanctions in history, Iran has sternly warned that it will launch devastating retaliation against any new threats. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

2.【US Avoidance of Military Conflict and Shift to Economic and Cognitive Warfare】Parliamentary Speaker Ghalibaf sharply pointed out that the US seems to have given up on winning a direct military conflict and has instead resorted to ruthless economic and cognitive warfare. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

3.【Expansion of Local Currency Settlements Between Iran and Iraq】Prohibited from using dollar settlements, Iran and Iraq are expanding settlements using the rial and dinar, making regional decoupling from the dollar a reality. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

4.【The Global Trend of Accelerating "De-Dollarization"】Starting with China's expan-sion of yuan settlements, Russia, India, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia are breaking away from dollar dependence, shaking the absolute dominance of the dollar. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)

5.【The Terror That Arrives When the Dollar Is Expelled as the Reserve Currency】With America's privilege of infinite borrowing lost, maintaining massive fiscal deficits and military expenditures becomes impossible, causing America to plunge into an or-dinary nation. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

6.【Structural Reasons Why US Financial Sanctions Will Cease to Work】If countries refusing to use dollar settlements increase, US financial sanctions will lose their effi-cacy as a weapon, collapsing the core of hegemony. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

7.【The Upheaval of the Dollar-Standard System Built by Kissinger】If the dollar-standard system—the center of global trade, investment, and debt—weakens, debt crises in emerging markets and wild currency fluctuations will be triggered in a chain reaction. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

8.【The Massive Impact of Dollar Weakening Directly Hitting the Japanese Economy】For Japan, which depends on the dollar for half of its foreign reserves and whose trade and government bonds are affected, the weakening of the dollar will instantly accelerate a weak yen, high prices, and financial instability. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

9.【Proposal of the G3MA Concept Assuming the Collapse of Dollar Hegemony】Anticipating this crisis, I am proposing the G3MA concept as a realistic solution to prevent the collapse of dollar hegemony and global instability. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

10.【Redesigning the World Order Through Trilateral Coordination of the US, China, and Russia】The framework of G3MA, where the US, China, and Russia coordinate, is the sole method to prevent uncontrollable dollar collapse and advance an orderly in-ternational redesign. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

11.【The Joint Financial Order Management Function Performed by G3MA】By having the three major powers jointly manage the financial order, standardize multi-currency settlements, and stabilize trade, the risks of sanction abuse and financial crises can be drastically reduced. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

12.【A Mechanism to Soft-Land the Collapse of the Dollar】G3MA functions not mere-ly as a military alliance, but as a safety net for the global economy to preemptively curb the chaos of a dollar collapse. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

13.【Complete Redesign of World Order Capitalizing on the Crisis】My G3MA concept is an indispensable blueprint for turning the imminent crisis of dollar collapse to our advantage and generating a new international legal system of peace and stability. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

14.【An Unprecedented World Faced by American Citizens】Through the loss of dollar hegemony and the reduction of military power, American citizens will face unprece-dented shifts in living standards and an era of turbulence. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

15.【A Strong Warning to the International Community for Future Stability】America's unilateral sanction policies have reached their limits, and unless the world immediately transitions to a cooperative regime via G3MA, a destructive financial cri-sis is unavoidable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Part 1 Related URL

Iran says US gave up military option, warns of 'devastating' retaliation to sanctions

https://jp.reuters.com/world/security/BO4IVJO5ABNKLCRNOLGXQRYKX4-2026-08-21/

I will write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)

Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]

Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.

Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.

Read the full text here: To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

[Chapter 1] Case Overview

Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.

Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.

2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.

May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).

June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.

The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.

[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation

This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.

Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.

The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:

A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.

The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.

Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.

Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.

This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.

[My Argument]

Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.

Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.

This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.

Continued in the Saturday Edition.

Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones

I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.

This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.

Global Special Zone Project NO2

https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

Nagano Opinion NO1

https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp