To President Trump!
October 27, 2026 【Today’s Proposal】 The world is approaching a new historical turning point toward ending the war in Ukraine. According to the Wall Street Journal, President Putin proposed during a phone call with President Trump on the 9th of this month that Russia, the United States, and China hold a trilateral summit next month. China has indicated it would not oppose the idea if President Trump agrees, and President Trump himself has expressed support.
The U.S.–China–Russia trilateral summit is the key to ending the war in Ukraine and represents a historic turning point in which major powers construct a new interna-tional order as the United Nations becomes dysfunctional. Just as the end of World War II was determined by the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences, the responsibility for ending this war must again rest with the major powers. I propose the creation of the “G3MA (Global 3‑zone Military Alliance)” led by the United States, China, and Russia, and the establishment of the “GPA (Global Peace Army)” composed of all other na-tions. This model applies the logic of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), transforms all nations into exclusively defensive states, reduces global military spending to 1/100 of current levels, and enables free medical care, free education, and free elder care. The U.S.–China–Russia summit marks the starting point of this new world order. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
1.【Proposal for a U.S.–China–Russia Summit】President Putin proposed the conven-ing of a trilateral summit during his phone call with President Trump. China has indi-cated it would not oppose the idea if President Trump agrees, and President Trump himself supports it. This represents a new diplomatic phase toward ending the war in Ukraine. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
2.【China’s Response and Converging Interests Among the Three Powers】China is receptive to Russia’s proposal, and the trilateral summit shows that the interests of the three major powers are beginning to align. The prolonged war in Ukraine is dis-advantageous to all three. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
3.【Historical Significance of Establishing G3MA】I view this summit as the founding meeting of the U.S.–China–Russia military alliance (G3MA). G3MA is a new world‑order model that institutionally prevents war by balancing the military power of the three major powers. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
4.【The Need for GPA (Global Peace Army)】In coordination with G3MA, a Global Peace Army (GPA) composed of all other nations should be established. GPA would manage nuclear weapons among member states and standardize the exclusively de-fensive national model worldwide. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
5.【Dysfunction of the United Nations】The United Nations cannot restrain major powers or stop wars. In Ukraine, Gaza, and Iran, the UN has lost its cri-sis‑management capability. A new order is necessary. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
6.【Historical Parallels with the Yalta Conference】The end of World War II was shaped by the Yalta Conference between the U.S., U.K., and Soviet Union. The up-coming U.S.–China–Russia summit may similarly become a “Second Yalta Conference” that determines the framework for ending the war. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
7.【Lessons from the Potsdam Conference】The Potsdam Conference decided Japan’s unconditional surrender. War termination is always determined by agreement among major powers. When too many parties participate, the end of war becomes impossi-ble. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
8.【Why Ukraine Should Not Be Included in the Summit】Including Ukraine or the EU would complicate interests and make ending the war impossible. War termination must be decided by the major powers. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
9.【Value of Direct Negotiations Among the Three Powers】With the UN dysfunctional, direct negotiations among the U.S., China, and Russia are the only realistic means of crisis management. If the major powers agree, the war will stop. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
10.【Applying the Logic of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)】MAD prevented nu-clear war through the fear of mutual destruction. G3MA institutionalizes this logic to maintain peace. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
11.【Global Standardization of the Exclusively Defensive State Model】Under G3MA and GPA, all nations become exclusively defensive states. Without offensive capabili-ties, wars cannot begin. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
12.【A World with Military Spending Reduced to 1/100】In an exclusively defensive world, military spending drops to 1/100 of current levels. The savings can fund free medical care, free education, and free elder care, dramatically improving citizens’ lives. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
13.【A New Political Philosophy Beyond Left and Right】In the G3MA–GPA world, tra-ditional left–right divisions lose meaning. A new political philosophy centered on peace and quality of life is required. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
14.【Responsibilities of GPA Member States】Ukraine, Iran, Israel, and North Korea should become GPA member states and share responsibility for nuclear management. The era of relying on the United States is over. （Yasuhiro Nagano）
15.【Expectations for the U.S.–China–Russia Summit】The trilateral summit marks the starting point for ending the war in Ukraine and establishing a new world order. I welcome this summit and strongly hope it leads to the creation of G3MA and GPA.（Yasuhiro Nagano）
Part 1 — Related URL
“Putin proposes U.S.–China–Russia summit to end fighting with Ukraine,” reported by Nippon TV Network
https://news.ntv.co.jp/category/international/86c1b67be84a4bdcb310179f6a816099
I will write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano（Jpan）
1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)
Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]
Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.
Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.
Read the full text here: To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
[Chapter 1] Case Overview
Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.
Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.
2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.
May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).
June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.
The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.
[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation
This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.
Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.
The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:
A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.
The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.
Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.
Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.
This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.
[My Argument]
Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.
Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.
This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.
Continued in the Saturday Edition.
Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones
I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.
This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.
Global Special Zone Project NO2
https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
Nagano Opinion NO1
https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
