To President Trump!
2026-10-12 [Proposal for Today] A resolute and aggressive 15-section policy state-ment denouncing the crisis of the rule of law originating in Japan, the contradictions of international justice, Tomoko Akane’s nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize as a reflection of the violation of Article 34 of the Vienna Convention, and the global dis-semination of Japanese-style arbitrariness. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
1【Expansion of ICC Jurisdiction and the Nobel Peace Prize Coverage】The rule of law originating in Japan is terrifying! The background behind Tomoko Akane being re-ported as a "Nobel Peace Prize candidate" is that the ICC issuing an arrest warrant for President Putin was highly praised by a segment of the international community. Many people are outraged by the ICC's violations of international law. (Yasuhiro Na-gano)
2【Grave International Legal Contradictions and Criticisms of Candidate Selection】As I have pointed out, a grave international legal contradiction exists—namely, the ICC's expansion of jurisdiction to investigate non-member states—and it is only natural that criticism arises that ignoring this and nominating her "shakes the value of the Nobel Prize." (Yasuhiro Nagano)
3【Why the Nobel Peace Prize Candidate Coverage Is Problematic】Why is the cover-age of being a "Nobel Peace Prize candidate" problematic? The sense of incongruity I felt is extremely justified even from the perspective of international law. The key point is Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
4【The Reality of Violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention】Reason 1: The ICC is violating Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. A treaty imposes no obligations on third states. The U.S. is not an ICC member, Israel is not a member, and Russia is not a member. Despite this, the ICC has investigated and issued arrest warrants for American soldiers, the Israeli Prime Minister, and the Russian President. This is an act that breaches the foundational principle of international law (pacta tertiis). (Ya-suhiro Nagano)
5【Importing Japanese Prosecutorial Culture into International Justice】Reason 2: Akane may have brought Japanese prosecutorial culture (arbitrary interpretation) into the ICC. The structure that occurred in my case—expanding administrative disposi-tions into criminal punishments, arbitrary detention, and punishing claims of false ac-cusation—is characteristic of Japan's prosecutorial culture. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
6【Akane’s Background and the Global Spread of Arbitrariness】Akane originates from the Japanese prosecutor corps and has been deeply involved in the ICC's inves-tigation policies. Consequently, criticism exists that "Japanese-style arbitrariness"—where the ICC expands its jurisdiction to investigate nationals of non-member states—has been exported to international justice. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
7【U.S. Sanctions Imposed on Akane】Reason 3: The United States sanctioned Akane. The Trump administration imposed sanctions, asset freezes, and entry bans on ICC officials including Akane. The reason is clear, and Russia's sanctions are like-wise clear. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
8【Illegality of Exercising Authority Over Non-Member States】"The ICC is exercising authority over non-member states. This is a violation of international law." In other words, the U.S. and Russia treat Article 34 of the Vienna Convention as an absolute principle. The ICC is breaking it. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
9【Political Evaluation in the Nobel Peace Prize and European Values】Reason 4: The Nobel Prize includes "political evaluation." The Nobel Peace Prize is strongly influ-enced by international politics, international public opinion, and European values. The Nobel Prize is on the verge of being politicized. It is regrettable. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
10【Institutional Reflection of European Political Values】Because the ICC is support-ed by Europe (especially France and the Netherlands), a structural dynamic exists wherein European political values are reflected in the selection of Nobel Peace Prize candidates. It is crazy! (Yasuhiro Nagano)
11【Concerns Shared Among International Relations Scholars】The feeling I experi-enced—that "this will destroy the value of the Nobel Prize"—is shared among interna-tional relations scholars as well. Everyone, please verify this through Article 34 of the Vienna Convention. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
12【Structural Complete Consistency with My Case】The structural connection to my case. My case is the earliest concrete example where the Japanese judiciary deviated from its original authority and arbitrarily expanded it. That structure is completely consistent with the ICC's problem. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
13【From Japanese Judicial Structural Issues to Global Impact】My case is the case that most early on demonstrated the structural problems of the Japanese judiciary, forming part of the same continuous structure as the ICC problem. The 2010 Immi-gration Control Act violation case even exerted influence up to the ICC. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
14【Overcoming Human Rights Violations and Fundamental Reform of Domestic Gov-ernance】My case involves grave violations of international human rights law: arbi-trary detention, infringement on the principle of legality, inhuman treatment, and a lack of remedy. Unless Japan is governed under the rule of law, the ICC problem cannot be resolved. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
15【Continued Petitions to International Bodies and the Victory of Justice】I will con-tinue submitting petitions to the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC), the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), and the Office of the UN High Com-missioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). Justice will surely triumph. (Yasuhiro Nagano)
Part 1 Related URL
ICC nominated for Nobel Peace Prize; PRIO predicts, "Emphasizing responsibility to respect international law"
https://news.ntv.co.jp/category/international/7c11cf199c5345c3a2c30d3a8eb752b6
I will write again tomorrow.
Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese people)
1. Weekday Edition (Logical Contradictions in Immigration Law Violation Cases - Chapters 1-2)
Part 2: The Immigration Control Act Violation Case [Weekday Edition]
Japan’s judicial system and immigration administration involve severe human rights violations that challenge international standards. Through my own experience, I strongly question Japan's status as a constitutional state governed by the rule of law.
Please first read how I was wrongfully implicated in a case of "Aiding and Abetting the Violation of the Immigration Control Act" in 2010.
Read the full text here: To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
[Chapter 1] Case Overview
Autumn 2008: My company (where I serve as President) executed an employment contract with Chinese students holding student visas, promising to hire them upon their university graduation the following spring.
Late 2008: The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy triggered a global financial crisis, resulting in the abrupt cancellation of our upcoming system development projects.
2009: Due to the severe economic downturn, we were forced to rescind the job offers. Consequently, the graduated students had no choice but to continue working at the restaurants where they had been employed part-time during their studies.
May 2010: These former Chinese students were arrested for "Activities Other Than Those Permitted Under the Status of Residence" (Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act).
June 2010: I and our Chinese recruitment manager were also arrested. The charge brought against us was "Aiding and Abetting" (under the Penal Code) their unauthorized technical employment.
The Prosecution’s Logic: The prosecution asserted that our prior issuance of the employment contract constituted a "false document," which subsequently aided their unauthorized work.
[Chapter 2] Fatal Flaws in Judicial Interpretation
This indictment and subsequent judgment completely disregard fundamental legal principles, relying on an entirely arbitrary interpretation of the law.
Under Article 22-4, Paragraph 1, Item 4 of the Immigration Control Act at that time, submitting false documents merely granted the Minister of Justice the authority to revoke a residency status as an administrative disposition (leading to deportation). The act of submitting false documents itself was not codified as a criminal offense. Logically, one cannot be convicted of "aiding and abetting" an act that is not a crime in itself.
The court’s reasoning followed a convoluted chain of causality:
A residency status was obtained via a false employment contract.
The individuals resided in Japan based on that status.
Consequently, they engaged in unauthorized part-time work.
Therefore, the issuer of the initial contract aided and abetted the unauthorized work.
This is a far-fetched, flawed causal link that completely violates the principles of modern legal logic.
[My Argument]
Confusion of Administrative Dispositions and Criminal Penalties: The Immigration Control Act explicitly designates the consequences for false documentation as administrative measures (revocation of status and deportation). The legal process concludes there.
Absence of a Principal Offender: The actual employers of the restaurants where the students worked were never prosecuted for "Encouraging Illegal Employment" (Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act). Under the principle of equality under the law, it is a legal contradiction to punish us for aiding and abetting when the principal employers themselves were not prosecuted.
This same flawed legal doctrine was later improperly applied to diplomats and embassy staff.
Continued in the Saturday Edition.
Part 3: A New Business Model via Special Economic Zones
I propose the establishment of "Special Economic Zones" designed to accept refugees and migrants as "temporary migrant workers," with their residency restricted to these designated zones.
This framework offers a dual benefit: advanced nations secure low-cost labor to drive economic growth, while migrants receive human dignity, secure jobs, and free access to housing, food, healthcare, and education.
Global Special Zone Project NO2
https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/
Nagano Opinion NO1
https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/
For details on Parts 4 through 10, please refer to the Sunday Edition.
Yasuhiro Nagano
Archive Blog (Past Articles): To World Media
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp










