To President Trump! September 10, 2025 In economics, a strong dollar is due to a strong U.S. economy. President Trump has stated that he wants to maintain a strong U.S. economy, which leads to a strong dollar. There's a contradiction here. Furthermore, economics dictates that excessive interest rate cuts accelerate inflation. The Federal Reserve is more concerned about inflation than interest payments. Trump's counterargument lacks persuasive power.

 To President Trump!

September 10, 2025

The United States is suffering from twin deficits. The budget deficit has reached a record high of $34 trillion. President Trump is calling on the Federal Reserve to low-er interest rates.

Regarding the trade deficit, the "Trump Tariffs" are driving up import prices and discouraging imports. President Trump has said he will offset tax cuts with tariff revenue, but tariff negotiations are proving difficult.

Trade deficits are typically addressed by central banks lowering interest rates, weakening the dollar. However, President Trump's interest rate cuts are intended to reduce the burden of interest payments.

Economics generally attributes the trade deficit that President Trump is concerned about to a strong dollar. Why does he not tolerate a weaker dollar?

Economics posits that a strong dollar is due to a strong U.S. economy. President Trump has stated that he wants to maintain a strong U.S. economy. This leads to a strong dollar. There's a contradiction here.

Furthermore, economics predicts that excessive interest rate cuts will accelerate inflation. The Federal Reserve is more concerned about inflation than interest pay-ments. Trump's counterarguments are not particularly persuasive.

The President has repeatedly pressured Fed Chairman Powell to lower interest rates, and the Chairman has publicly expressed his dissatisfaction. Which view is correct? What do you think?

In economics, a strong dollar is due to the strength of the U.S. economy. If the Fed raises interest rates enough to push the economy into recession and suppress do-mestic demand, it could lead to a weaker dollar.

The trade deficit will be eliminated, but the Trump administration dislikes reces-sions. Please understand that Trump's statements fluctuate between a weak dollar and a strong dollar.

Many economists argue that a trade deficit is not a bad thing. Their rationale is Ri-cardo's theory of comparative advantage, which is unrealistic for the United States.

The United States is already a country with a large number of highly productive service workers, leaving little room for improvement. The challenge is to increase manufacturing productivity.

The debate over a strong or weak dollar is endless. I continue to propose policies to eliminate the trade deficit by maintaining a strong dollar and improving the produc-tivity of American manufacturing.

To eliminate the trade deficit, President Trump uses high tariffs to raise the prices of imported goods so that they cannot compete with imports. This is merely an ad hoc policy.

I propose establishing a "special zone" on the Mexican border. This "special zone" would be separate and distinct from the existing American economy.

To improve the productivity of American manufacturing, labor-intensive factories, primarily assembly factories, would be attracted to the "special zone."

The workers in this "special zone" would be "illegal immigrants" who gather at the Mexican border. They would be allowed into the country on "temporary resident status" and employed as "low-wage workers."

By employing "temporary immigrants" at "lower wages than those in China or Mexi-co," factories within the special zone would be able to produce products with higher productivity than those in China or Mexico. More tomorrow.

Part 1: References

The "Trade Deficit is Bad, Imports are Losses" Fallacy

https://www.dlri.co.jp/report/macro/422952.html

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp