To President Trump! November 14, 2025 If Mr. Trump is to receive the Nobel Prize in Economics, we should establish a "special zone" and create a "new capitalism that coexists with illegal immigrants." This would simultaneously solve the current major social issues of "labor shortages" and "illegal immigration." Today, I propose "establishing" "elderly care facilities for parents" within the "special zone" for a few hundred dollars per month. This would reduce the rate of job turnover due to caregiving among low- and middle-income Americans.

To President Trump!

November 14, 2025

If Trump is to receive the Nobel Prize in Economics, he should establish a "spe-cial zone" and create a "new capitalism that coexists with illegal immigrants." This would simultaneously solve the current major social issues of "labor short-ages" and "illegal immigration."

Today, I propose establishing "elderly care facilities for parents" within the "special zone" for a few hundred dollars per month. This would reduce the rate of job turnover due to caregiving among low- and middle-income Americans.

In the United States, an increasing number of children are quitting their jobs to care for their parents, exacerbating the labor shortage and threatening to send the American economy into a vicious cycle.

Quitting work to care for parents reduces income and worsens the family's fi-nancial situation. According to an AARP survey, the average family spends more than $7,000 per year (about 26% of income) on caregiving.

Caregivers experience significant physical and mental fatigue. The "sandwich generation," who simultaneously care for both children and parents, is particu-larly stressed.

By 2030, approximately 10,000 people are expected to turn 65 every day in the United States, and experts are pointing to the inadequacies of the country's long-term care system.

Institutional care is extremely expensive, with monthly fees for a private room in a nursing home in urban areas sometimes exceeding 1 million yen ($6,600). These prices are unimaginable for most Japanese people.

If things continue as they are, even if we increase the number of "temporary immigrants" (illegal immigrants), the number of working Americans will de-crease and the economy will shrink.

That is why I propose "establishing" elderly care facilities within "special zones." I believe we should create facilities where care can be provided for each care re-cipient for a few hundred dollars per month.

This would utilize the system that provides free food, clothing, and shelter, just as it does for "temporary immigrants" (illegal immigrants). Much of the food, clothing, and shelter costs at elderly care facilities would be covered by the la-bor of volunteers and "temporary immigrants."

Elderly care facilities would employ "temporary immigrants" as care assistants. Much of the care staff would be American volunteers.

If the cost of caring for a parent were less than a few hundred dollars per per-son per month, it would be within the "affordable" range for low- to middle-income earners.

If the federal and state governments subsidized care costs of less than a few hundred dollars per person per month, the "caregiving cost burden" for work-ing families would be nearly zero.

Republican and Democratic lawmakers should unanimously support the crea-tion of "special districts" and the establishment of elderly care facilities.

If Trump were to apply his "new capitalism" that coexists with "illegal immi-grants" not only in theory but also in policy and practice, he would undoubtedly win the Nobel Prize in Economics.

Part 1: References

"Compared to America, it's like heaven": The reality of caregiving in Japan, as seen after a three-year return.Junko Iwasaki

 https://media.finasee.jp/articles/-/10099?page=3#:~:

I'll write again tomorrow.

Yasuhiro Nagano (Japanese)

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

❤Click below to read the full article!

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp