Posts

Showing posts from September, 2018

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2018-09-30】

September 29, 2018 Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/POTD-September-27-2018-1200x800.jpg ● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a   #MeToo victim   too. http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Dear Sirs International people. Sunday version: September 30, 2018:

<Public mail> #metoo Human rights victim! As "countermeasures for inflow of immigrants" is to "make economic refugees" "not to occur", rather than "constructing" the "wall" in the "Sahara desert". To that end, it is "best" to build a factory in the "country of origin" of "economic refugees". It creates "employment". Dear Sir or Madam: Many media have "fake news" flowing. President Donald Trump proposed to build "wall" in "Sahara desert" as "immigration inflow countermeasure" against Spain's "foreign minister". Some media reported that "the White House denies this proposal." The reason is that many immigrants entering Spain enter the Morocco through the Sahara Desert first, then cross the Mediterranean. It is estimated that the walls of the Mexico border will cover 3,200 kilometers in length and the

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2018-09-29】

September 28, 2018 Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/POTD-September-27-2018-1200x800.jpg ● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a   #MeToo victim   too. http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Dear Sirs International people. Saturday version September 29, 2018: NO 6: Now, "Toy soldiers" is in "Orientation". I'm "vomiting" on the first day, I am in "living alone" as a sick person. "Prison executives" do not know the rules of prison.

<Public mail> #metoo Human rights victim! Dear Sirs International people. Saturday version September 29, 2018: NO 6: Now, "Toy soldiers" is in "Orientation". I'm "vomiting" on the first day, I am in "living alone" as a sick person. "Prison executives" do not know the rules of prison. Dear Sirs, Japan is doing the death penalty. Please know the "criminal penalty" in Japan. This story is my actual experience. "Imprisonment" is "punish people, criminal punishment". It differs from the West. I obeyed the law. But why was I being imprisoned in prison? It is "human rights violation". It is the continuation of the previous week. ※ The author of this "toy soldier" is Nagano Yasuhiro. When I'm in "Lone living room" for a sick person, "a great prison officer" is "patrolling" with a lot of "subordinates". Since I am a r

To President Trump 2018-09-28: Is this crazy 'logic of the law' the same in America, UK, France and Germany? If different, please condemn the Japanese government. The reason is for freedom and democracy.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. It is a "trial" in Osaka in 2015. Chinese international students whose status of residence is "study abroad" did "hostess" and worked. She was arrested for "illegal employment crime (activity outside the qualification)" and it became "guilty". And he became "forcibly repatriated to China". However, she fought in trial as "unjust". The result was reversed "innocent". It is the continuation of the previous day. In case The reason for the "judgment" is that it does not allow "work time restriction" of 28 hours a week or "non-qualified labor" at "shop of the sex industry" as " . This "rule" is not "immigration law" (law) but "order" of "Ministry of Justice". Therefore, the judge dismissed the prosecution's "indictment" as

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2018-09-28】

September 27, 2018 Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/POTD-September-26-2018-1920x720.jpg ● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a   #MeToo victim   too. http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Angela Merkel an den Bundesminister der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2018-09-28: Ist diese verrückte "Gesetzeslogik" in Amerika, Großbritannien, Frankreich und Deutschland dieselbe? Wenn anders, verurteilen Sie bitte die japanische Regierung. Der Grund ist Freiheit und Demokratie.

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer! Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bin Japaner. Es ist eine "Probe" in Osaka im Jahr 2015. Chinesische internationale Studenten, deren Aufenthaltsstatus "Auslandsstudium" ist, haben "Gastgeberin" und gearbeitet. Sie wurde wegen "illegaler Arbeitskriminalität (Aktivität außerhalb der Qualifikation)" verhaftet und "schuldig". Und er wurde "gewaltsam nach China zurückgeführt". Sie kämpfte jedoch im Prozess als "ungerecht". Das Ergebnis wurde "unschuldig" umgekehrt. Es ist die Fortsetzung des Vortages. Der Grund für das "Urteil" ist "Aktivitäten außerhalb des Status der Qualifikation", "Arbeitszeitbeschränkung" von 28 Stunden pro Woche, Ich gebe nicht zu "Arbeit außerhalb der Qualifikation" bei "Shop des Sexmarktes" = Shop der Sexindustrie. Diese "Regel" ist nicht "Einwanderungs

À Emmanuel · Macron Président français 2018-09-28: Est-ce que cette "logique de la loi" est la même en Amérique, au Royaume-Uni, en France et en Allemagne? Si différent, veuillez condamner le gouvernement japonais. La raison est pour la liberté et la démocratie.

<Courrier public> #MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme! Chers Messieurs, je suis japonais. C'est un "procès" à Osaka en 2015. Les étudiants internationaux chinois dont le statut de résidence est "étudier à l'étranger" ont fait de "l'hôtesse" et ont travaillé. Elle a été arrêtée pour "crime de travail illégal (activité hors qualification)" et elle est devenue "coupable". Et il est devenu "rapatrié de force en Chine". Cependant, elle a participé au procès comme étant "injuste". Le résultat a été inversé "innocent". C'est la continuation de la journée précédente. La raison de la "décision" est "Activités en dehors du statut de qualification", "restriction du temps de travail" de 28 heures par semaine, Je n'admets pas "travail en dehors de la qualification" à "Boutique du marché du sexe" = Boutique de l'industri

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2018-09-28: Is this crazy 'logic of the law' the same in America, UK, France and Germany? If different, please condemn the Japanese government. The reason is for freedom and democracy.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. It is a "trial" in Osaka in 2015. Chinese international students whose status of residence is "study abroad" did "hostess" and worked. She was arrested for "illegal employment crime (activity outside the qualification)" and it became "guilty". And he became "forcibly repatriated to China". However, she fought in trial as "unjust". The result was reversed "innocent". It is the continuation of the previous day. In case The reason for the "judgment" is that it does not allow "work time restriction" of 28 hours a week or "non-qualified labor" at "shop of the sex industry" as " . This "rule" is not "immigration law" (law) but "order" of "Ministry of Justice". Therefore, the judge dismissed the prosecution's "indictment" as no

To Everyone in the world 2018-09-28: Is this crazy 'logic of the law' the same in America, UK, France and Germany? If different, please condemn the Japanese government. The reason is for freedom and democracy.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. It is a "trial" in Osaka in 2015. Chinese international students whose status of residence is "study abroad" did "hostess" and worked. She was arrested for "illegal employment crime (activity outside the qualification)" and it became "guilty". And he became "forcibly repatriated to China". However, she fought in trial as "unjust". The result was reversed "innocent". It is the continuation of the previous day. In case The reason for the "judgment" is that it does not allow "work time restriction" of 28 hours a week or "non-qualified labor" at "shop of the sex industry" as " . This "rule" is not "immigration law" (law) but "order" of "Ministry of Justice". Therefore, the judge dismissed the prosecution's "indictment" as no

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2018-09-27】

September 26, 2018 Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence President Trump returns to the United Nations https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/POTD-September-25-2018-1920x720.jpg ● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a   #MeToo victim   too. http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

To President Trump 2018-09-27: Prosecutors' "pointing out" is not based on the law. Even if "contract of employment" is "false", it can not be said that we "acquired" the qualification of residence "easy".

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! "Granting condition" of the "status of residence" is "not disclosed". Granted "at the" discretion "of the minister concerned. Individuals can not "instruct" "discretionary authority" of "Minister of Justice" or "Foreign Minister" to "easy". Dear Sirs, Article 31 of the Constitution stipulates that "No one can be deprived of its life or freedom unless he / she follows the procedure prescribed by the law, or can not impose any other punishment". It is the continuation of the previous day. Submission of "employment contract documents" is not law or "ministerial ordinance", but "seeking" by foreigners by "notice of section manager" of the Ministry of Justice. "Business operator" scheduled to hire is cooperating with "Notice of section manager" of the Ministry o

Angela Merkel an den Bundesminister der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2018-09-27: Das "Hinzeigen" der Staatsanwälte basiert nicht auf dem Gesetz. Auch wenn "Arbeitsvertrag" "falsch" ist Man kann nicht sagen, dass wir den "Aufenthaltsstatus" als "leicht" "erworben" haben.

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer! "Zuerkennungsbedingung" des "Aufenthaltsstatus" ist "nicht offengelegt". Zugegeben "nach Ermessen" des betreffenden Ministers. Einzelpersonen können "Ermessensbefugnis" von "Minister der Justiz" oder "Außenminister" nicht zu "leicht" "anweisen". Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Artikel 31 der Verfassung "Wenn durch das gesetzlich vorgeschriebene Verfahren nichts unternommen wird, Es kann sein Leben oder seine Freiheit nicht wegnehmen oder keine andere Strafe auferlegen. Es ist festgelegt. Es ist die Fortsetzung des Vortages. Die Einreichung eines "Arbeitsvertragsdokuments" ist kein Gesetz oder eine "ministerielle Verordnung", sondern "Vorlage eines Abteilungsleiters" des Justizministeriums. Ich bitte Ausländer, "sich zu unterwerfen". Der zu mietende "Unternehmer" kooperiert mit

À Emmanuel · Macron Président français 2018-09-27: Les «rappels» des procureurs ne sont pas fondés sur la loi. Même si «contrat de travail» est «faux»

On ne peut pas dire que nous avons "acquis" le "statut de résidence" comme "facile". La "condition d'octroi" du "statut de résidence" est "non divulguée". Accordé "à la discrétion" du ministre concerné. Les individus ne peuvent pas "ordonner" "pouvoir discrétionnaire" du "ministre de la Justice" ou du "ministre des affaires étrangères" à "facile". Chers Messieurs, Article 31 de la Constitution "Si rien n'est fait selon la procédure prescrite par la loi, Il ne peut pas enlever sa vie ou sa liberté, ni imposer aucune autre sanction. Il est stipulé. C'est la continuation de la journée précédente. La présentation du "document du contrat de travail" n'est pas une loi ou une "ordonnance ministérielle", mais une "soumission du chef de section" du ministère de la Justice " Je demande aux étrangers de "s

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2018-09-27: Prosecutors' "pointing out" is not based on the law. Even if "contract of employment" is "false",

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! it can not be said that we "acquired" the qualification of residence "easy". "Granting condition" of the "status of residence" is "not disclosed". Granted "at the" discretion "of the minister concerned. Individuals can not "instruct" "discretionary authority" of "Minister of Justice" or "Foreign Minister" to "easy". Dear Sirs, Article 31 of the Constitution stipulates that "No one can be deprived of its life or freedom unless he / she follows the procedure prescribed by the law, or can not impose any other punishment". It is the continuation of the previous day. Submission of "employment contract documents" is not law or "ministerial ordinance", but "seeking" by foreigners by "notice of section manager" of the Ministry of Justice. "Business operator&quo

To Everyone in the world 2018-09-27: Prosecutors' "pointing out" is not based on the law. Even if "contract of employment" is "false",

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! it can not be said that we "acquired" the qualification of residence "easy". "Granting condition" of the "status of residence" is "not disclosed". Granted "at the" discretion "of the minister concerned. Individuals can not "instruct" "discretionary authority" of "Minister of Justice" or "Foreign Minister" to "easy". Dear Sirs, Article 31 of the Constitution stipulates that "No one can be deprived of its life or freedom unless he / she follows the procedure prescribed by the law, or can not impose any other punishment". It is the continuation of the previous day. Submission of "employment contract documents" is not law or "ministerial ordinance", but "seeking" by foreigners by "notice of section manager" of the Ministry of Justice. "Business operator&qu

To President Trump 2018-09-26: Even if a foreigner submits a "Contract of Employment with False Content" to the immigration office and obtains the "status of residence" from the Minister of Justice as "technology" or "humanities / international"

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! It is clear that if you work within the scope of "status of residence" of "technology" or "humanities / international", it will not result in illegal work (activity outside the status of qualification). Therefore "Contract of false employment" is nothing to do with "illegal work". Japanese judicial can not even understand this logic. Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. My argument is that the application of "crime to support other crimes" of "criminal law" is a criminal act for the following reasons. "Name of sin" is "False accusation" of "criminal law" and is "crime of abusing the authority of special public servants." It is the continuation of the previous day. 1. The aid for assisting illegal employment is stipulated in Article 2, Article 73 of the Immigration Act, "Special Law", "Crime of Promoting Ill

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2018-09-26】

September 25, 2018 Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/POTD-September-24-2018-1920x720.jpg ● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a   #MeToo victim   too. http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Angela Merkel an den Bundesminister der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2018-09-26: Ausländer reichen bei der Einwanderungsbehörde "Arbeitsvertrag mit falschem Inhalt" ein Auch wenn der Justizminister den "Aufenthaltsstatus" von "Technologie" oder "Geisteswissenschaften / International" erhält

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer! Wenn Sie im Rahmen des "Aufenthaltsstatus" von "Technologie" oder "Geisteswissenschaften / International" arbeiten Es ist klar, dass dies nicht zu illegaler Arbeit führt (Aktivität außerhalb des Status der Qualifikation). Daher hat der "Vertrag mit falscher Beschäftigung" nichts mit "illegaler Arbeit" zu tun. Die japanische Justiz kann diese Logik nicht einmal verstehen. Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bin Japaner. Mein Argument ist, dass die Anwendung von "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" des "Strafgesetzbuches" Es ist eine kriminelle Handlung aus den folgenden Gründen. "Name der Sünde" ist "Falsche Anklage" des "Strafrechts" und ist "Verbrechen des Missbrauchs der Autorität besonderer Beamter". Es ist die Fortsetzung des Vortages. 1. Hilfe für illegale Beschäftigung, Es ist in Artikel 2,

À Emmanuel · Macron Président français 2018-09-26: Les étrangers se présentent au bureau de l'immigration "Contrat de travail avec un contenu erroné" Même si le ministre de la Justice obtient le "statut de résidence" de "technologie" ou "humanités / international"

<Courrier public> #MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme! Si vous travaillez dans le cadre du "statut de résidence" de "technologie" ou "sciences humaines / internationales" Il est clair que cela n'entraînera pas de travail illégal (activité en dehors du statut de qualification). Par conséquent, le «contrat de faux emploi» n’a rien à voir avec le «travail illégal». Les autorités judiciaires japonaises ne peuvent même pas comprendre cette logique. Chers Messieurs, je suis japonais. Mon argument est que l'application du "crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes" du "code pénal" C'est un acte criminel pour les raisons suivantes. "Nom du péché" est "Fausse accusation" de "droit pénal" et est "crime d'abuser de l'autorité de fonctionnaires spéciaux". C'est la continuation de la journée précédente. 1. Assistance pour emploi illégal, Il est stipulé à l'

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2018-09-26: Even if a foreigner submits a "Contract of Employment with False Content" to the immigration office and obtains the "status of residence" from the Minister of Justice as "technology" or "humanities / international"

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! It is clear that if you work within the scope of "status of residence" of "technology" or "humanities / international", it will not result in illegal work (activity outside the status of qualification). Therefore "Contract of false employment" is nothing to do with "illegal work". Japanese judicial can not even understand this logic. Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. My argument is that the application of "crime to support other crimes" of "criminal law" is a criminal act for the following reasons. "Name of sin" is "False accusation" of "criminal law" and is "crime of abusing the authority of special public servants." It is the continuation of the previous day. 1. The aid for assisting illegal employment is stipulated in Article 2, Article 73 of the Immigration Act, "Special Law", "Crime of Promoting Ille

To Everyone in the world 2018-09-26: Even if a foreigner submits a "Contract of Employment with False Content" to the immigration office and obtains the "status of residence" from the Minister of Justice as "technology" or "humanities / international"

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! It is clear that if you work within the scope of "status of residence" of "technology" or "humanities / international", it will not result in illegal work (activity outside the status of qualification). Therefore "Contract of false employment" is nothing to do with "illegal work". Japanese judicial can not even understand this logic. Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. My argument is that the application of "crime to support other crimes" of "criminal law" is a criminal act for the following reasons. "Name of sin" is "False accusation" of "criminal law" and is "crime of abusing the authority of special public servants." It is the continuation of the previous day. 1. The aid for assisting illegal employment is stipulated in Article 2, Article 73 of the Immigration Act, "Special Law", "Crime of Promoting Ille

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2018-09-25】

September 24, 2018 Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message. President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out. Sincerely, The Office of Presidential Correspondence https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/POTD-September-20-2018-1200x720.jpg ● Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a   #MeToo victim   too. http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

To President Trump 2018-09-25: "SOS". To the best of my knowledge, in 2014 and 2015, employees and diplomats of the "Philippine Embassy" have been "punished" by the same illegal logic "crime aiding other crimes" has been applied I will.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim! Since international law violations are taking place on a daily basis, please urgently respond. Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. In the "incident supporting illegal labor" in 2010, judicial officials conducted more vicious criminal acts. In the past, we did not dispose of "employers who employed illegal foreigners" as "crime that promotes illegal labor" ... It is the continuation of the previous day. Until now, foreigners who had "illegal labor" in Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Crime of Illegal Labor" were disposed of by "fine punishment" and "expulsion outside the country". Even in this case, the prosecution has not "punished" those who illegally "hired" foreigners in Immigration Act 73-2 "Crime that promoted illegal labor". However, instead of the employer, a third party was "hoaxed" as "one who promoted il

Angela Merkel an den Bundesminister der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2018-09-25: "SOS". Soweit ich weiß, sind wir in den Jahren 2014 und 2015 auch für Beamte und Diplomaten der "Philippinischen Botschaft" zuständig.

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer! "Bestrafung" wurde angewandt, indem "andere Verbrechen" mit ähnlicher illegaler Logik durchsucht wurden. Da es täglich zu Verstößen gegen das Völkerrecht kommt, antworten Sie bitte dringend. Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bin Japaner. Im Jahr 2010 "Vorfall zur Unterstützung illegaler Arbeit" Justizbeamte habe ich mehr böswillige kriminelle Handlungen getan. In der Vergangenheit hatten wir "Arbeitgeber, die illegale Ausländer beschäftigten" nicht als "Verbrechen, das illegale Arbeit fördert" ... Es ist die Fortsetzung des Vortages. Bisher haben Ausländer, die "illegale Arbeit" in Artikel 70 des Zuwanderungsgesetzes "Verbrechen der illegalen Arbeit" durchgeführt haben "Fine Penalty" und "Verfolgen außerhalb des Landes". Selbst in diesem Fall wurde die Anklage mit dem Einwanderungsgesetz 73-2 "Sünde, die illegale Arbeit a