1/21/2019

Thank you freedom and democracy【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2019-01-21】




January 20, 2019

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.
President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.
Sincerely,
The Office of Presidential Correspondence


Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a  #MeToo victim  too.



Dr. Lee Young-ho, Foreign Minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea 2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan and the law under the Constitution. "Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid. How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear sirs. Please "forward" this e-mail to Foreign Minister Lee Yong-Ho.
This mail is sending every day to the world media,
the embassies of various countries, the White House, etc.


Dr. Lee Young-ho, Foreign Minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea


2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan
and the law under the Constitution.
"Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid.
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


Dear sirs. In the Japanese judicial system, there is a "retrial request system",
but "Error in applied law" can not claim.
However, if a crime such as a police officer who "participates" in the incident is confirmed,
you can request a retrial.
Crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges is obvious.
Despite being not a crime they are "arresting and detaining" us.
It is "a crime that a special civil servant abused" authority of duties ".
Despite being not a crime,
they "complained" by "false reasons" so it is "crime of false complaint" of criminal law.
"Intentional" is unnecessary as the reason for constituting the crime
of "crimes of special public servants abusing their authority".
(According to the judicial precedent of the Supreme Court).

So I submitted "indictment" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office
and the Metropolitan Police Department.
Those for Chinese and Philippine people submitted "accusation letters".
However, although I submitted them many times, they "did not accept".
The reason is "Crime is not clear". (See the document on the site)

Since Japan has given prosecutors "monopoly right of indictment",
we can not trial as a criminal case unless the prosecution accepts "indictment" or "accusation letter".

Prosecutors receive "indictment" and "letter of accusation",
and "case" where this is "non-prosecution" has a method of forced prosecution.
It is possible by requesting a "review request" to the "prosecution review board" of the court.
However, the prosecution will not receive 'indictment letter' or 'accusation letter'.
With this, the method of last relief was "exhausted".
I requested a review for the "Tokyo Prosecution Review Board" at "Preparedness to be rejected",
but it was rejected.
The reason is not treated as "Non-prosecution".

Because this case is "force majeure" by the state by the exercise of power,
I think that "statute of limitations runs out is stopping".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
The prosecution still ignores it.
It is a villainous crime more than the abduction of Japanese nationals in North Korea.
In the Constitution of Japan, judges are not bound by any constitution.
However,
it is imposed on the Constitution of Japan the obligation to observe the Constitution and the law.
In other words, the judgment that violates the law is a crime.

Even this, can you not understand, or are you not having justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom, democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2 (a crime that promoted illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law" against Article 70
of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
 (crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to His Excellency Lee Young Ho ***************************************** *

Please request from the Pyongyang government to the Japanese government.
"The Japanese government should" resolve "the incident of abduction of foreigners" incident.
There are many "victims" of "Koreans" who are "the same ethnic group".
On behalf of "people of Korea" please protest the Japanese government!

I also send the contents of the same to President Donald Trump of the White House.
President Donald Trump sometimes has encouragement reply.
For example, it is a reply like the following. The contents are different every time.

The White House, Washington
November 16, 2018
  In case

There is no greater honor than serving as President of the United States. I especially enjoy hearing from the American people, and I appreciate you emailing your thoughts and suggestions.

"Babe" Ruth, Jr., Elvis Presley, Alan Page, Senator Orrin (Raber Staubach, Justice Antonin Scalia, George Herman) Hatch, and Miriam Adelson. Each of these extraordinary individuals has made an indelible mark on American history through their outstanding achievements and endeavors.

I encourage you to watch today's ceremony honoring these outstanding Americans.

My staff is closely reviewing your correspondence to ensure that your views, questions, questions, questions, questions, and concerns are addressed.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump


The White House, Washington
October 28, 2018
  In case

Thank you for your email. My staff is closely reviewing your correspondence to ensure your views, questions, questions, questions, questions, and concerns are addressed.

As my administration continues to fight the drug and opioid crisis on all fronts, I encourage Americans to participate in National Prescription Drug Take Back Day Saturday, October 27, 2018. Take Back Day is in an opportunity for individuals to safely dispose of expired or unused prescription drugs at one of any of the thousands of drop-off sites.

Ninety percent of these accidental fatalities are due to drug overdose, and the majority of drug poisoning deaths are opioid-related -A problem that most frequently originates inside the family medicine cabinet.

During a hands of prescription drugs for disposal at more than 5,800 collection sites: sufficient pills to fill three Boeing 757 airplanes. We must continue to ensure that these drugs do not end up in the hands of our most vulnerable.

Together, we will defeat this epidemic as one people, one family, and one magnificent Nation under God.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump


From the staff of the White House, I receive a reply every day

November 19, 2018

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.

President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.

Sincerely,

The Office of Presidential Correspondence

I am waiting for a reply from the North Korean government.

My information *********************************************** ****

Yasuhiro Nagano


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************



o President Trump 2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan and the law under the Constitution. "Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid. How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To President Trump


2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan
and the law under the Constitution.
"Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid.
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


Dear sirs. In the Japanese judicial system, there is a "retrial request system",
but "Error in applied law" can not claim.
However, if a crime such as a police officer who "participates" in the incident is confirmed,
you can request a retrial.
Crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges is obvious.
Despite being not a crime they are "arresting and detaining" us.
It is "a crime that a special civil servant abused" authority of duties ".
Despite being not a crime,
they "complained" by "false reasons" so it is "crime of false complaint" of criminal law.
"Intentional" is unnecessary as the reason for constituting the crime
of "crimes of special public servants abusing their authority".
(According to the judicial precedent of the Supreme Court).

So I submitted "indictment" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office
and the Metropolitan Police Department.
Those for Chinese and Philippine people submitted "accusation letters".
However, although I submitted them many times, they "did not accept".
The reason is "Crime is not clear". (See the document on the site)

Since Japan has given prosecutors "monopoly right of indictment",
we can not trial as a criminal case unless the prosecution accepts "indictment" or "accusation letter".

Prosecutors receive "indictment" and "letter of accusation",
and "case" where this is "non-prosecution" has a method of forced prosecution.
It is possible by requesting a "review request" to the "prosecution review board" of the court.
However, the prosecution will not receive 'indictment letter' or 'accusation letter'.
With this, the method of last relief was "exhausted".
I requested a review for the "Tokyo Prosecution Review Board" at "Preparedness to be rejected",
but it was rejected.
The reason is not treated as "Non-prosecution".

Because this case is "force majeure" by the state by the exercise of power,
I think that "statute of limitations runs out is stopping".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
The prosecution still ignores it.
It is a villainous crime more than the abduction of Japanese nationals in North Korea.
In the Constitution of Japan, judges are not bound by any constitution.
However,
it is imposed on the Constitution of Japan the obligation to observe the Constitution and the law.
In other words, the judgment that violates the law is a crime.

Even this, can you not understand, or are you not having justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom, democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2 (a crime that promoted illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law" against Article 70
of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
 (crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************




À Emmanuel · Président français Macron 2019-01-21: Les juges sont tenus de respecter la Constitution du Japon et la loi en vertu de la Constitution. "Jugement" contraire aux lois et au droit international est invalide. Combien de temps le gouvernement japonais poursuivra-t-il cette "comédie"?

<Courrier public> #MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme!


À Emmanuel · Président français Macron


2019-01-21: Les juges sont tenus de respecter la Constitution du Japon et la loi en vertu de la Constitution.
"Jugement" contraire aux lois et au droit international est invalide.
Combien de temps le gouvernement japonais poursuivra-t-il cette "comédie"?


Chers Messieurs. Dans le système judiciaire japonais,
Il existe un "système de facturation à la reprise", mais vous ne pouvez pas demander "Erreur de droit appliqué".
Cependant, si un crime tel qu'un policier qui "participe" à l'incident est confirmé, vous pouvez demander un nouveau procès.
La criminalité des policiers, des procureurs et des juges est évidente.
Bien qu'ils ne soient pas un crime, ils nous "arrêtent et nous détiennent".
C'est "un crime qu'un fonctionnaire spécial a abusé de" l'autorité des devoirs ".
En dépit d'être pas un crime,
Parce qu'ils se sont "plaints" par "raison fausse", ils constituent un "crime de fausse plainte" de droit pénal.
"Intentionnel" n'est pas nécessaire pour constituer le crime de "crimes de fonctionnaires spéciaux abusant de leur autorité".
(Selon le précédent judiciaire de la Cour suprême).

J'ai donc soumis un "acte d'accusation" au parquet du district et au département de la police métropolitaine de Tokyo.
Ceux des Chinois et des Philippins ont soumis des "lettres d'accusation".
Cependant, bien que je les ai soumises à plusieurs reprises, elles "n'ont pas accepté".
La raison est "Le crime n'est pas clair". (Voir le document sur le site)

Depuis que le Japon a donné aux procureurs un "droit d'accusation monopolistique"
Nous ne pouvons pas juger comme une affaire pénale à moins que l'accusation accepte "l'acte d'accusation" ou la "lettre d'accusation".

Les procureurs reçoivent des «lettres d'inculpation» et des «accusations»
Il existe une méthode de poursuite forcée pour "affaire" où il s'agit de "non poursuite".
Il est possible de demander une "demande de révision" au "comité de révision des poursuites" du tribunal.
Toutefois, l'accusation ne recevra ni "lettre d'inculpation" ni "lettre d'accusation".
Avec cela, la méthode du dernier soulagement était "épuisée".
Je suis "prêt à être rejeté"
J'ai déposé une "requête en examen" auprès du "Tokyo Prosecution Review Board", mais celle-ci a été rejetée.
La raison n'est pas traitée comme une "non-poursuite".

Parce que ce cas est "force majeure" par l'Etat, par l'exercice du pouvoir,
Je pense que "le délai de prescription est écoulé, c'est la fin".

C'est un crime d'officier de police, de procureur, de juge au Japon.
L'accusation l'ignore toujours. C'est un crime odieux davantage que l'enlèvement de ressortissants japonais en Corée du Nord.
Dans la Constitution du Japon, les juges ne sont liés par aucune constitution.
Cependant, la Constitution du Japon impose l'obligation de respecter la Constitution et la loi.
En d'autres termes, le jugement qui viole la loi est un crime.

Même cela, ne pouvez-vous pas comprendre ou n'avez-vous pas justice?
Veuillez vous lever pour faire du monde une société où la liberté, la démocratie et les droits de l'homme sont protégés.
Je continuerai demain.
Je vais continuer jusqu'à ce que vous compreniez.

Je "fais appel" des deux choses.
C'est une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme par le gouvernement japonais.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et compensation" soit effectué.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais un étranger est innocent.

L'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration "Péchés du travail illégal" était puni par les étrangers.
D'autre part, la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration utilise des employeurs qui sont des "relations de cause à effet" de travail illégal au sens de la Loi sur l'immigration 73-2
(Un crime qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, le pouvoir judiciaire japonais ne "jette" que des étrangers, mais il ne dispose pas des employeurs.
Cela viole évidemment le "principe d'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international interdisant l’élimination consciente des étrangers.

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement un étranger est innocent, un étranger qui a travaillé illégalement est innocent.
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe personne «qui ait soutenu d’autres crimes de droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate dans le pays philippin, membre du personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La "cause du crime" à laquelle l'accusation applique "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" est la suivante.
Les étrangers ont commis l'acte prévu à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration (acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" contre cela.
La décision est "annulation du statut de résidence" du "ministre de la Justice" et "retrait obligatoire vers des pays étrangers".
Par conséquent, "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" ne peut pas être appliqué.

Le gouvernement japonais "écrase" les plaintes.
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir de l'Etat, c'est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Le matériel est en dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
S'il vous plaît "sauver" beaucoup de "victimes" avec "courage et justice".
Je demande au gouvernement japonais de "récupérer son honneur" et de "dédommager la victime" de la victime.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano



Il est ouvert au programme ci-dessous.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten 2019-01-21: Die Richter sind verpflichtet, die japanische Verfassung und das verfassungsmäßige Gesetz zu befolgen. "Gesetze", die gegen Gesetze und internationales Recht verstoßen, sind ungültig. Wie lange wird die japanische Regierung diese "Komödie" fortsetzen?

<Öffentliche Post> #MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer!


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten


2019-01-21: Die Richter sind verpflichtet, die japanische Verfassung und das verfassungsmäßige Gesetz zu befolgen.
"Gesetze", die gegen Gesetze und internationales Recht verstoßen, sind ungültig.
Wie lange wird die japanische Regierung diese "Komödie" fortsetzen?


Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, In der japanischen Justiz,
Es gibt ein "Retrial Invoicing System", Sie können jedoch keine Anforderung mit "Fehler in angewandter Rechtsordnung" stellen.
Wenn jedoch ein Verbrechen wie ein Polizeibeamter, der an dem Vorfall "beteiligt" ist, bestätigt wird, können Sie ein erneutes Verfahren beantragen.
Verbrechen an Polizeibeamten, Staatsanwälten und Richtern liegen auf der Hand.
Obwohl sie kein Verbrechen sind, „verhaften“ sie uns.
Es ist "ein Verbrechen, das ein Sonderbeamter die" Dienstbefugnis "missbraucht hat.
Obwohl es kein Verbrechen ist,
Weil sie sich aus falschen Gründen "beklagen", handelt es sich um "Verbrechen falscher Strafanzeigen".
"Absichtlich" ist unnötig als Grund für das Verbrechen von "Verbrechen von Staatsbeamten, die ihre Autorität missbrauchen".
(Nach dem gerichtlichen Präzedenzfall des Obersten Gerichtshofs).

Also reichte ich eine Anklageschrift bei der Staatsanwaltschaft des Bezirks Tokio und der Metropolitan Police Department ein.
Diejenigen für Chinesen und Philippinen reichten "Anschuldigungsschreiben" ein.
Obwohl ich sie viele Male eingereicht habe, "akzeptierten sie sie nicht".
Der Grund ist "Verbrechen ist nicht klar". (Siehe das Dokument auf der Website)

Da Japan Anklägern "Monopol Anklagerecht" gegeben hat
Wir können kein Gerichtsverfahren als Strafverfahren durchführen, wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft "Anklageschrift" oder "Anklageschreiben" akzeptiert.

Staatsanwälte erhalten "Anklageschreiben" und "Anklagen"
Es gibt eine Methode der Zwangsverfolgung für "Fälle", bei denen es sich um "Nichtverfolgung" handelt.
Es ist möglich, wenn eine "Überprüfungsanfrage" beim "Strafverfolgungsausschuss" des Gerichts beantragt wird.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft erhält jedoch keine Anklageschrift oder Anklageschrift.
Damit war die Methode der letzten Erleichterung "erschöpft".
Ich bin "bereit, abgelehnt zu werden"
Ich habe beim "Tokyo Prosecution Review Board" einen "Prüfungsantrag" eingereicht, der jedoch abgelehnt wurde.
Der Grund wird nicht als "Nichtverfolgung" behandelt.

Weil dieser Fall "höhere Gewalt" durch den Staat durch Ausübung von Macht ist,
Ich denke "Verjährungsfrist läuft aus".

Es ist ein Verbrechen an einem Polizeibeamten, einem Staatsanwalt, einem Richter in Japan.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft ignoriert es immer noch. Es ist mehr ein Verbrechen als die Entführung japanischer Staatsbürger in Nordkorea.
In der japanischen Verfassung sind Richter an keine Verfassung gebunden.
Der Verfassung von Japan wird jedoch die Verpflichtung auferlegt, die Verfassung und das Gesetz zu beachten.
Mit anderen Worten, das Urteil, das gegen das Gesetz verstößt, ist ein Verbrechen.

Können Sie selbst das nicht verstehen oder haben Sie keine Gerechtigkeit?
Bitte stellen Sie sich auf, um die Welt zu einer Gesellschaft zu machen, in der Freiheit, Demokratie und Menschenrechte geschützt werden.
Ich werde morgen weitermachen.
Ich werde weitermachen, bis du verstanden hast.

Ich "appelliere" an die beiden Dinge.
Es ist eine "internationale" Verletzung der Menschenrechte durch die japanische Regierung.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Ehreerhebung und Entschädigung" erfolgt.

1. Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsgenehmigung" durch. Aber ein Ausländer ist unschuldig.

Nur Ausländer wurden durch Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden illegaler Arbeit" bestraft.
Auf der anderen Seite verwendet das Immigration Control Act Arbeitgeber, die "Ursache-Wirkungs-Beziehungen" illegaler Arbeit im Rahmen des Immigration Act 73-2 sind
(Ein Verbrechen, das illegale Beschäftigung förderte).

Die japanische Justiz "entsorgt" jedoch nur Ausländer, verfügt jedoch nicht über Arbeitgeber.
Dies verstößt offensichtlich gegen den "Grundsatz der Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal beschäftigt hat, unschuldig ist, ist ein Ausländer, der illegal gearbeitet hat, unschuldig.
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, "der andere strafrechtliche Verbrechen unterstützt hat" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat im philippinischen Land, ein Mitarbeiter der philippinischen Botschaft" ist unschuldig.

2 Der "Grund für ein Verbrechen", auf das die Staatsanwaltschaft Anwendung findet "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" lautet wie folgt.
Ausländer führten die in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes vorgeschriebene Tat durch (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente).
Dagegen gibt es keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Disposition ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" durch "Justizminister" und "obligatorischer Rückzug ins Ausland".
Daher kann "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" nicht angewandt werden.

Die japanische Regierung "zermalmt" Beschwerden.
"Zerquetschen" durch Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Das Material ist unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Bitte "retten" Sie viele "Opfer" mit "Mut und Gerechtigkeit".
Ich fordere die japanische Regierung auf, "die Ehre zurückzugewinnen" und "das Opfer zu entschädigen".

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano



Meine Informationen ***************

Es ist offen für das Programm unten.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


 (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan and the law under the Constitution. "Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid. How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan
and the law under the Constitution.
"Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid.
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


Dear sirs. In the Japanese judicial system, there is a "retrial request system",
but "Error in applied law" can not claim.
However, if a crime such as a police officer who "participates" in the incident is confirmed,
you can request a retrial.
Crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges is obvious.
Despite being not a crime they are "arresting and detaining" us.
It is "a crime that a special civil servant abused" authority of duties ".
Despite being not a crime,
they "complained" by "false reasons" so it is "crime of false complaint" of criminal law.
"Intentional" is unnecessary as the reason for constituting the crime
of "crimes of special public servants abusing their authority".
(According to the judicial precedent of the Supreme Court).

So I submitted "indictment" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office
and the Metropolitan Police Department.
Those for Chinese and Philippine people submitted "accusation letters".
However, although I submitted them many times, they "did not accept".
The reason is "Crime is not clear". (See the document on the site)

Since Japan has given prosecutors "monopoly right of indictment",
we can not trial as a criminal case unless the prosecution accepts "indictment" or "accusation letter".

Prosecutors receive "indictment" and "letter of accusation",
and "case" where this is "non-prosecution" has a method of forced prosecution.
It is possible by requesting a "review request" to the "prosecution review board" of the court.
However, the prosecution will not receive 'indictment letter' or 'accusation letter'.
With this, the method of last relief was "exhausted".
I requested a review for the "Tokyo Prosecution Review Board" at "Preparedness to be rejected",
but it was rejected.
The reason is not treated as "Non-prosecution".

Because this case is "force majeure" by the state by the exercise of power,
I think that "statute of limitations runs out is stopping".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
The prosecution still ignores it.
It is a villainous crime more than the abduction of Japanese nationals in North Korea.
In the Constitution of Japan, judges are not bound by any constitution.
However,
it is imposed on the Constitution of Japan the obligation to observe the Constitution and the law.
In other words, the judgment that violates the law is a crime.

Even this, can you not understand, or are you not having justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom, democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2 (a crime that promoted illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law" against Article 70
of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
 (crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone at the media 2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan and the law under the Constitution. "Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid. How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


To everyone at the media


2019-01-21: Judges are obliged to follow the Constitution of Japan
and the law under the Constitution.
"Judgment" contrary to laws and international law is invalid.
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


Dear sirs. In the Japanese judicial system, there is a "retrial request system",
but "Error in applied law" can not claim.
However, if a crime such as a police officer who "participates" in the incident is confirmed,
you can request a retrial.
Crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges is obvious.
Despite being not a crime they are "arresting and detaining" us.
It is "a crime that a special civil servant abused" authority of duties ".
Despite being not a crime,
they "complained" by "false reasons" so it is "crime of false complaint" of criminal law.
"Intentional" is unnecessary as the reason for constituting the crime
of "crimes of special public servants abusing their authority".
(According to the judicial precedent of the Supreme Court).

So I submitted "indictment" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office
and the Metropolitan Police Department.
Those for Chinese and Philippine people submitted "accusation letters".
However, although I submitted them many times, they "did not accept".
The reason is "Crime is not clear". (See the document on the site)

Since Japan has given prosecutors "monopoly right of indictment",
we can not trial as a criminal case unless the prosecution accepts "indictment" or "accusation letter".

Prosecutors receive "indictment" and "letter of accusation",
and "case" where this is "non-prosecution" has a method of forced prosecution.
It is possible by requesting a "review request" to the "prosecution review board" of the court.
However, the prosecution will not receive 'indictment letter' or 'accusation letter'.
With this, the method of last relief was "exhausted".
I requested a review for the "Tokyo Prosecution Review Board" at "Preparedness to be rejected",
but it was rejected.
The reason is not treated as "Non-prosecution".

Because this case is "force majeure" by the state by the exercise of power,
I think that "statute of limitations runs out is stopping".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
The prosecution still ignores it.
It is a villainous crime more than the abduction of Japanese nationals in North Korea.
In the Constitution of Japan, judges are not bound by any constitution.
However,
it is imposed on the Constitution of Japan the obligation to observe the Constitution and the law.
In other words, the judgment that violates the law is a crime.

Even this, can you not understand, or are you not having justice?
Please stand up to make the world a society where freedom, democracy and human rights are protected.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

I "appeal" the two things.
It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2 (a crime that promoted illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law" against Article 70
of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
 (crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
(acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world are being sacrificed.
Please report the facts as a journalist.
"Government under the law" can not be bought by money.

My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/


Yasuhiro Nagano

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

1/20/2019

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2019-01-20】 Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.




Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2019-01-20


January 19, 2019

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.
President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.
Sincerely,
The Office of Presidential Correspondence


Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a  #MeToo victim  too.



Dear Sirs International people. Sunday version: January 20, 2019: I asked for support from the Japan Federation of Bar Associations. "Japan Federation of Bar Associations" said that "we can not support you" because "the power to support me" is insufficient. The following is the continuation of my damage.

<Public mail> # metoo Human rights victim!


Dear Sirs International people.


Sunday version: January 20, 2019:
I asked for support from the Japan Federation of Bar Associations.
"Japan Federation of Bar Associations" said that "we can not support you"
because "the power to support me" is insufficient.
The following is the continuation of my damage.

Dear sirs. Lefco finally got a chance of "V-shaped recovery". But,
Lefco Inc. became "self-bankruptcy" as "beginning dawn first inception inchoation kick off origin"
More than 165 shareholders also suffered an economic loss of "investment".
And the dream of the public offering collapsed and the shareholders received "mental distress".
I am How disappointing!

I ended the "prison sentence" on 19th March 2013.
I am not feeling well.
I was waiting for a voluntary request for retrial
by the public prosecutor (withdrawal of indictment).
The prosecution apologized to me and waited for me to revive the property rights.
But they are "craftiness" peculiar to "criminals".
They intend to "escape" to the last.
So I complained the judicial officials with "False accusation"
and "abuse of authority by special public officer".

The seriousness of this case is a breach of the "legality principle".
A criminal offense that judicial officials should not do.
All judicial officials involved in this case are "abusing authority of duties".
Judicial officials are doing crime very ordinarily.

People from the international community looking at the net
and sending mails to me say that in Japan, this incident happened can not be believed.
People from the international community were convinced that Japan was an advanced country
and a legal nation.

In Japan, "false charges" due to misidentification of facts is a common story
However, in this case the prosecutors etc. made "creation of crime".
And the prosecutors "arrested, confined" us by law (private law) which does not exist.

It is a "criminal act" that denies the "legality principle" by judicial officials.

Judicial officials are doing domiciliary search, arrest, prosecution, trial,
ignoring the constitution and laws.
There are many police officials, prosecutors, and judges involved.
Everyone says, "Even though a lawyer is on ..." Why! "" I can not believe it! "

I asked for support from the Japan Federation of Bar Associations.
However, because the "Japan Federation of Bar Associations" does not have the ability to support you,
he said "I can not support you."

In this way, it is impossible in Japan to solve under the law.
We need your "power" of the international community.

It will continue on January 26th.

Please understand Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act.
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
The full text is below.
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1934&vm&re

This is the reason for the crime pointed out in the indictment
The prosecution says that we did "aiding
and abetting" of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revocation of Status of Residence."
This punishment is the cancellation of "status of residence".

(Revocation of Status of Residence)
Article 22-4 A Minister of Justice may obtain a foreign national who resides
in Japan with the status of residence of the upper column of Appended Table 1
or Appended Table 2 under the recognition of a refugee under paragraph 1 of Article 61-2 ),
If any of the facts listed in each of the following items is found,
the applicant may revoke the status of residence that the alien actually has
under the procedure specified by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.

1 omitted
2 omission
3 omitted
※ ※ ※ ※
"A bill of indictment" is "posting" 4 below. It's crazy.
Documents submitted by the Chinese to "Tokyo Immigration Bureau" correspond to the following 4.
The prosecution "pointed out" that this document "false document" was "provided" to the Chinese.

4 In addition to what is listed in the preceding three items,
documents with misrepresented statements (certificates and misrepresentations stipulated
in Article 7-2, paragraph 1, which was issued
by submission or presentation of documents with misstatements or drawings)
Including a visa received on a passport as a result of submission
or presentation of a certain document or drawing of the same) or a seal
or the like of landing permission by submission or presentation of drawings.

5 omitted
(Forced deportation)
(Deportation)
Article 24 For a foreign national who falls under any of the following items,
it is possible to force the departure from Japan by the procedure prescribed in the next chapter.

* The following was added in 2010 July.
(3) Invalidly illegally issuing a certificate by the provisions
of the first clause or the second clause of the preceding chapter,
a seal of a landing permit (including a record under the provisions of Article 9 paragraph 4)
or permission, iv Falsify or alter documents or drawings,
create false documents or drawings for the purpose
of permitting landing pursuant to the provisions of the section
or obtaining permission under the provisions of Section 1 or Section 3 of the next chapter,
Any person who exercises, possesses, or provides for altered documents
or drawings or false documents or drawings, or suggests or helps these acts

There is no "good abduction" or "bad abduction" in abduction / confinement. Help me!

There are many victims around the world.
Please support "appeal to ICC".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

In case
Since the above translation documents are inaccurate,
please contact us by email.

Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



1/19/2019

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2019-01-19】Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.



Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2019-01-19

The White House, Washington January 18, 2019

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.

President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.

Sincerely,

The Office of Presidential Correspondence



Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a  #MeToo victim  too.



Dear Sirs International people. Saturday version January 19, 2019: Constitution, Article 72, All judges follow their conscience and independently exercise their authority and are bound only to this constitution and law. But the judge does not keep constitution and law. The following is the continuation of my "damage".


<Public mail> #metoo Human rights victim!


Dear Sirs International people.


Saturday version January 19, 2019:
Constitution, Article 72, All judges follow their conscience
and independently exercise their authority and are bound only to this constitution and law.
But the judge does not keep constitution and law.
The following is the continuation of my "damage".


Lefco had borrowed from Mizuho Bank and Mitsubishi UFJ Bank.
I was putting my house at Mizuho Bank with revolving collateral preservation.
And I and my wife and sister had joint liability on guarantee.
Even though Lefko's bankruptcy was caused,
I only tried to transfer "dispatch" work to the new company continuously,
secured income and tried to "subrogate".
Therefore, "LLC Mirai" which was founded in a hurry was wasted by arrest.
The policeman made Lefco "bankruptcy".
Police officers heard the establishment of "LLC Mirai".
Police officers say Lefco is "calculated bankruptcy".
The policeman was "fool".

I was "looted" all the property rights guaranteed by the Constitution of Japan.
I lost credit, present and future income, I still carry debts.
Regarding two patents related to mobile phones,
I was requesting "registration of patent".
After "patent examination" for 2 years or more, registration was accepted.
However, since I was "imprisoned" at the Tokyo Detention Center,
the "Patent Office" could not contact with me.
Eventually, the registration has disappeared.
The sale of huge patents has also disappeared.

My wife and children were reported by television and newspaper reports,
and my wife was interrogated as a suspect and received mental suffering.
Moreover, economically,
we have suffered great "pain" due to the circumstances described above.

My house has become "voluntary auction" due to Lefco's bankruptcy.
My son purchased it by borrowing money from the bank. In case
My son paid "the costs of a lawsuit". My son has a lot of debts.

It will continue on January 13.

Everyone, please know the constitution of Japan.
It is the same as the countries of the world.
It is a wonderful constitution that the Allied Forces (US Army) gave to Japan,
the defeated country.
It is Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution.
"No one shall be deprived of its life or freedom unless it is done
by the procedures prescribed by law, and no other punishment can be imposed."

Procedures prescribed by law are legislation established in the Diet.

Article 72 Rights and obligations of judges
(Omitted)
All judges follow their conscience and independently exercise their authority
and are bound only to this constitution and law.

Judges do not comply with the Constitution of Japan.
Judges ignore Japanese law.

"Reason for the crime listed in the indictment" is "assistance"
under Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.
The judgment applies the criminal law, Article 60,
Article 62 "aiding and abetting" to the foreign immigration control law Article 70
(labor outside the status of qualification).
It is out of the logic of law.

Judicial officials in Japan can not understand this logical mistake.
In reality Japan, this constitution is "not protected".
Help me.

There are many victims around the world. Please support "appeal to ICC".

The material is below. http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Since the above translation documents are inaccurate,
please contact us by email.

Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp




1/18/2019

Thanks for human rights【Reply by e-mail from President  Trump 2019-01-18】Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.




January 17, 2019

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.
President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our country lies in the spirit of the American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.
Sincerely,
The Office of Presidential Corespondence


Here, many foreigners are victims. You are a  #MeToo victim  too.



Dr. Lee Young-ho, Foreign Minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea 2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1, criminal law 60" against "support" of Immigration Act 22-4-4 as "reason for crime".

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear sirs. Please "forward" this e-mail to Foreign Minister Lee Yong-Ho.
This mail is sending every day to the world media,
the embassies of various countries, the White House, etc.


Dr. Lee Young-ho, Foreign Minister of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea


2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists
on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1,
criminal law 60" against "support" of Immigration Act 22-4-4 as "reason for crime".
However, "offense" applies "Article 62 (1) of the Penal Code,
Criminal Code 60" to the Immigration Act 70 "Extracurricular Activities".
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
This is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law! Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


Dear sirs. "Kin Gungaku" who was considered "accomplice" was the same "punishment" as I was,
but because he admitted his sin,
he became "suspended execution" instead of "punishment for actual labor".
He was "forcibly repatriated" to China at the end of October 2010.
Four Chinese had become "sentence of labor one and a half" and "fine for punishment"
by around August 2010.
They are "deported" to China in "suspended execution".
In case
I and 4 Chinese people and Chinese Kin Gungaku are not protected
by the Constitution of Japan.

Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan (Equality under the Law) Paragraph 1.
"All citizens are equal under the law and are not discriminated against in political,
economic or social relations by race, creed, gender, social status or entrance."

Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan.
"No one shall be deprived of its life
or liberty unless it is in accordance with the procedures prescribed by law,
and no other punishment can be imposed."
"Procedure prescribed by law" refers to the law legislated in the Diet.

It is clearly contrary to "International Covenant
on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan. It is the following article.
Article 2 (1) (3), Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13,
Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17, Article
Article 26,

We have not committed any crime.
This is "False charges".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
Because the Japanese government will not accept it,
"condemnation" of the international community is necessary.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on next week.
I will continue until you understand.


I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
 (crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



Request to His Excellency Lee Young Ho ***************************************** *

Please request from the Pyongyang government to the Japanese government.
"The Japanese government should" resolve "the incident of abduction of foreigners" incident.
There are many "victims" of "Koreans" who are "the same ethnic group".
On behalf of "people of Korea" please protest the Japanese government!

I also send the contents of the same to President Donald Trump of the White House.
President Donald Trump sometimes has encouragement reply.
For example, it is a reply like the following. The contents are different every time.

The White House, Washington
November 16, 2018
  In case

There is no greater honor than serving as President of the United States. I especially enjoy hearing from the American people, and I appreciate you emailing your thoughts and suggestions.

"Babe" Ruth, Jr., Elvis Presley, Alan Page, Senator Orrin (Raber Staubach, Justice Antonin Scalia, George Herman) Hatch, and Miriam Adelson. Each of these extraordinary individuals has made an indelible mark on American history through their outstanding achievements and endeavors.

I encourage you to watch today's ceremony honoring these outstanding Americans.

My staff is closely reviewing your correspondence to ensure that your views, questions, questions, questions, questions, and concerns are addressed.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump


The White House, Washington
October 28, 2018
  In case

Thank you for your email. My staff is closely reviewing your correspondence to ensure your views, questions, questions, questions, questions, and concerns are addressed.

As my administration continues to fight the drug and opioid crisis on all fronts, I encourage Americans to participate in National Prescription Drug Take Back Day Saturday, October 27, 2018. Take Back Day is in an opportunity for individuals to safely dispose of expired or unused prescription drugs at one of any of the thousands of drop-off sites.

Ninety percent of these accidental fatalities are due to drug overdose, and the majority of drug poisoning deaths are opioid-related -A problem that most frequently originates inside the family medicine cabinet.

During a hands of prescription drugs for disposal at more than 5,800 collection sites: sufficient pills to fill three Boeing 757 airplanes. We must continue to ensure that these drugs do not end up in the hands of our most vulnerable.

Together, we will defeat this epidemic as one people, one family, and one magnificent Nation under God.

Sincerely,

Donald Trump


From the staff of the White House, I receive a reply every day

November 19, 2018

Thank you for contacting the White House. We are carefully reviewing your message.

President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our American people and their willingness to stay informed and get involved. President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.

Sincerely,

The Office of Presidential Correspondence

I am waiting for a reply from the North Korean government.

My information *********************************************** ****

Yasuhiro Nagano

Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************



To President Trump 2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1, criminal law 60" against "support" of Immigration Act 22-4-4 as "reason for crime".


<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To President Trump


2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists
on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1,
criminal law 60" against "support" of Immigration Act 22-4-4 as "reason for crime".
However, "offense" applies "Article 62 (1) of the Penal Code,
Criminal Code 60" to the Immigration Act 70 "Extracurricular Activities".
This is "topsy-turvy" "confused".
This is comedy.
Everyone who can understand the law! Please teach the Japanese government "logic of law".
How long will the Japanese Government continue this "comedy"?


Dear sirs. "Kin Gungaku" who was considered "accomplice" was the same "punishment" as I was,
but because he admitted his sin,
he became "suspended execution" instead of "punishment for actual labor".
He was "forcibly repatriated" to China at the end of October 2010.
Four Chinese had become "sentence of labor one and a half" and "fine for punishment"
by around August 2010.
They are "deported" to China in "suspended execution".
In case
I and 4 Chinese people and Chinese Kin Gungaku are not protected
by the Constitution of Japan.

Article 14 of the Constitution of Japan (Equality under the Law) Paragraph 1.
"All citizens are equal under the law and are not discriminated against in political,
economic or social relations by race, creed, gender, social status or entrance."

Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan.
"No one shall be deprived of its life
or liberty unless it is in accordance with the procedures prescribed by law,
and no other punishment can be imposed."
"Procedure prescribed by law" refers to the law legislated in the Diet.

It is clearly contrary to "International Covenant
on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan. It is the following article.
Article 2 (1) (3), Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13,
Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17, Article
Article 26,

We have not committed any crime.
This is "False charges".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
Because the Japanese government will not accept it,
"condemnation" of the international community is necessary.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on next week.
I will continue until you understand.


I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
 (crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for the victim" of the victim.

sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************




À Emmanuel · Président français Macron 2019-01-18: Selon la lettre de l'accusation Nous insistons sur le fait que "l'article 62, paragraphe 1, du droit pénal 60" doit "soutenir" la loi 22-4-4 sur l'immigration en tant que "motif du crime". Toutefois, le terme "infraction" s'applique "à l'article 62, paragraphe 1, du code


<Courrier public> # MeToo Victime des droits de l'homme!


À Emmanuel · Président français Macron


2019-01-18: Selon la lettre de l'accusation
Nous insistons sur le fait que "l'article 62, paragraphe 1, du droit pénal 60" doit "soutenir" la loi 22-4-4 sur l'immigration en tant que "motif du crime".
Toutefois, le terme "infraction" s'applique "à l'article 62, paragraphe 1, du code pénal, code pénal 60" de la loi sur l'immigration 70 "Activités extrascolaires".
C'est "topsy-turvy" "confus".
C'est de la comédie.
Tous ceux qui comprennent la loi! Veuillez enseigner au gouvernement japonais "la logique du droit".
Combien de temps le gouvernement japonais poursuivra-t-il cette "comédie"?


Chers Messieurs. "Kin Gungaku" qui était considéré comme "complice" était le même "châtiment" que moi,
Parce qu'il a reconnu sa culpabilité, il est devenu "une exécution suspendue" au lieu de "une punition pour travail effectif".
Il a été "rapatrié de force" en Chine à la fin du mois d'octobre 2010.
Vers le mois d'août 2010, quatre Chinois étaient devenus "condamnés à un mois et demi de peine" et "amende pour punition".
Ils sont "déportés" en Chine par "exécution suspendue".

I et 4 Chinois et le Chinois Kin Gungaku ne sont pas protégés par la Constitution du Japon.

Article 14 de la Constitution du Japon (Égalité devant la loi), paragraphe 1.
"Tous les citoyens sont égaux devant la loi et par race, croyance, sexe, statut social ou statut d'entrée,
Il n’est pas discriminé dans les relations politiques, économiques ou sociales. "

Article 31 de la Constitution du Japon.
"Nul ne peut être privé de sa vie ou de sa liberté sans suivre les procédures prescrites par la loi,
Ou vous ne pouvez pas imposer une autre punition. "
"Procédure prescrite par la loi" désigne la loi adoptée par la Diète.


Cela va clairement à l'encontre du "Pacte international relatif à la citoyenneté et aux droits politiques" ratifié par le Japon.
C'est l'article suivant.
Article 2, paragraphes 1 et 3, article 4, paragraphe 1,
Article 5, paragraphe 2,
Article 9, paragraphe 1, paragraphe 5,
L'article 13,
Article 14, paragraphe 6,
Article 15, paragraphe 1,
L'article 16,
Article 17, article
L'article 26,

Nous n'avons commis aucun crime.
C'est de "fausses accusations".

C'est un crime d'officier de police, de procureur, de juge au Japon.
Parce que le gouvernement japonais ne l'acceptera pas, une "condamnation" de la communauté internationale est nécessaire.

Même cela, vous ne pouvez pas comprendre?
Ou avez-vous pas de justice?

Je continuerai la semaine prochaine.
Je vais continuer jusqu'à ce que vous compreniez.


Je "fais appel" des deux choses.

C'est une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme par le gouvernement japonais.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et compensation" soit effectué.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais un étranger est innocent.

L'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration "Péchés du travail illégal" était puni par les étrangers.
D'autre part, la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration utilise des employeurs qui sont des "relations de cause à effet" de travail illégal au sens de la Loi sur l'immigration 73-2
(Un crime qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, le pouvoir judiciaire japonais ne "jette" que des étrangers, mais il ne dispose pas des employeurs.
Cela viole évidemment le "principe d'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international interdisant l’élimination consciente des étrangers.

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement un étranger est innocent, un étranger qui a travaillé illégalement est innocent.
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe personne «qui ait soutenu d’autres crimes de droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate dans le pays philippin, membre du personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La "cause du crime" à laquelle l'accusation applique "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" est la suivante.
Les étrangers ont commis l'acte prévu à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration (acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" contre cela.
La décision est "annulation du statut de résidence" du "ministre de la Justice" et "retrait forcé à l'étranger".
Par conséquent, "l'article 62 du Code pénal (crime de soutien à d'autres crimes)" ne peut pas être appliqué.

Le gouvernement japonais "écrase" les plaintes.
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir de l'Etat, c'est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Le matériel est en dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
S'il vous plaît "sauver" beaucoup de "victimes" avec "courage et justice".
Je demande au gouvernement japonais de "récupérer son honneur" et de "dédommager la victime" de la victime.

Cordialement, Yasuhiro Nagano



Il est ouvert au programme ci-dessous.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten 2019-01-18: Laut dem Anklageerlass Wir bestehen auf "dem Strafrecht Artikel 62 Absatz 1, dem Strafrecht 60", um "Immigration Act 22-4-4" als "Grund für ein Verbrechen" zu "unterstützen". "Straftat" gilt jedoch "Artikel 62 (1) des Strafgesetzbuchs, Strafgesetzbuch 60" für das Einwanderungsgesetz 70 "Außerschulische Aktivitäten". Dies ist "verrückt" "verwirrt".


<Öffentliche Post> # MeToo Menschenrechtsopfer!


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Bundespräsidenten


2019-01-18: Laut dem Anklageerlass
Wir bestehen auf "dem Strafrecht Artikel 62 Absatz 1, dem Strafrecht 60", um "Immigration Act 22-4-4" als "Grund für ein Verbrechen" zu "unterstützen".
"Straftat" gilt jedoch "Artikel 62 (1) des Strafgesetzbuchs, Strafgesetzbuch 60" für das Einwanderungsgesetz 70 "Außerschulische Aktivitäten".
Dies ist "verrückt" "verwirrt".
Das ist eine Komödie.
Jeder, der das Gesetz verstehen kann, lehre die japanische Regierung "Logik des Gesetzes".
Wie lange wird die japanische Regierung diese "Komödie" fortsetzen?


Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, "Kin Gungaku", das als "Komplize" galt, war die gleiche "Bestrafung" wie ich.
Weil er seine Schuld eingestanden hat, wurde er anstelle der "Bestrafung der tatsächlichen Arbeit" zur "Hinrichtung".
Ende Oktober 2010 wurde er "zwangsweise nach China zurückgeschickt".
Vier Chinesen waren gegen August 2010 zu "anderthalb Arbeitsstrafen" und "Strafenstrafe" geworden.
Sie werden in "suspendierter Hinrichtung" nach China "deportiert".

Ich und vier Chinesen und das chinesische Kin Gungaku sind nicht durch die japanische Verfassung geschützt.

Artikel 14 der Verfassung von Japan (Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz) Absatz 1.
"Alle Bürger sind unter dem Gesetz gleich und nach Rasse, Glaube, Geschlecht, sozialem Status oder Eintritt.
Sie wird in politischen, wirtschaftlichen oder sozialen Beziehungen nicht diskriminiert. "

Artikel 31 der japanischen Verfassung.
"Niemand darf seines Lebens oder seiner Freiheit beraubt werden, es sei denn nach den gesetzlich vorgeschriebenen Verfahren,
Oder du kannst keine andere Strafe verhängen. "
"Verfahren gesetzlich vorgeschrieben" bezieht sich auf das Gesetz, das im Landtag gesetzlich geregelt ist.


Es steht eindeutig im Widerspruch zu dem von Japan ratifizierten "Internationalen Pakt über Bürgerschaft und politische Rechte".
Es ist der folgende Artikel.
Artikel 2 Absatz 1 Nummer 3, Artikel 4 Absatz 1,
Artikel 5 Absatz 2
Artikel 9 Absatz 1 Nummer 5
Artikel 13
Artikel 14 Absatz 6
Artikel 15 Absatz 1
Artikel 16
Artikel 17, Artikel
Artikel 26

Wir haben kein Verbrechen begangen.
Dies ist "falsche Gebühren".

Es ist ein Verbrechen an einem Polizeibeamten, einem Staatsanwalt, einem Richter in Japan.
Da die japanische Regierung dies nicht akzeptieren wird, ist eine "Verurteilung" der internationalen Gemeinschaft notwendig.

Auch das kannst du nicht verstehen?
Oder hast du keine Gerechtigkeit?

Ich werde nächste Woche fortfahren.
Ich werde weitermachen, bis du verstanden hast.


Ich "appelliere" an die beiden Dinge.

Es ist eine "internationale" Verletzung der Menschenrechte durch die japanische Regierung.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Ehreerhebung und Entschädigung" erfolgt.

1. Ausländer führten "illegale Arbeit" außer "Aufenthaltsgenehmigung" durch. Aber ein Ausländer ist unschuldig.

Nur Ausländer wurden durch Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünden illegaler Arbeit" bestraft.
Auf der anderen Seite verwendet das Immigration Control Act Arbeitgeber, die "Ursache-Wirkungs-Beziehungen" illegaler Arbeit im Rahmen des Immigration Act 73-2 sind
(Ein Verbrechen, das illegale Beschäftigung förderte).

Die japanische Justiz "entsorgt" jedoch nur Ausländer, verfügt jedoch nicht über Arbeitgeber.
Dies verstößt offensichtlich gegen den "Grundsatz der Gleichheit unter dem Gesetz".
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die bewusste Beseitigung von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal beschäftigt hat, unschuldig ist, ist ein Ausländer, der illegal gearbeitet hat, unschuldig.
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, "der andere strafrechtliche Verbrechen unterstützt hat" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat im philippinischen Land, ein Mitarbeiter der philippinischen Botschaft" ist unschuldig.

2 Der "Grund für ein Verbrechen", auf das die Staatsanwaltschaft Anwendung findet "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" lautet wie folgt.
Ausländer führten die in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes vorgeschriebene Tat durch (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Einreichung falscher Dokumente).
Dagegen gibt es keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Disposition ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" durch "Justizminister" und "obligatorischer Rückzug ins Ausland".
Daher kann "Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs (Verbrechen der Unterstützung anderer Straftaten)" nicht angewandt werden.

Die japanische Regierung "zermalmt" Beschwerden.
"Zerquetschen" durch Staatsmacht ist "Stopp" der "Verjährung".

Das Material ist unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Bitte "retten" Sie viele "Opfer" mit "Mut und Gerechtigkeit".
Ich fordere die japanische Regierung auf, "die Ehre zurückzugewinnen" und "das Opfer zu entschädigen".

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Yasuhiro Nagano



Meine Informationen ***************

Es ist offen für das Programm unten.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


 (Yasuhiro Nagano)

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-01-18: According to the "indictment" the prosecution insists on "criminal law Article 62 paragraph 1, criminal law 60" against "support" of Immigration Act 22-4-4 as "reason for crime". However, "offense" applies "Article 62 (1) of the Penal Code,

【公開メール】#MeToo人権被害者!


テリサ・メイ英首相に


2019-01-18:「起訴状」によると検察は主張
"刑法第62条第1項、
「犯罪の理由」としての移民法22-4-4の「支持」に反対する刑法60。
ただし、「犯罪」は、刑法第62条第1項を適用します。
刑法60 "移民法70"課外活動 "に。
これは "混乱" "混乱"です。
これはコメディーです。
法律を理解できる人なら誰でも!日本政府に「法の論理」を教えてください。
日本政府はこの「コメディ」をいつまで続けるのでしょうか。


拝啓。「共犯者」と考えられていた「キン・ガンガク」は私と同じ「罰」でした、
しかし彼は自分の罪を認めたので
彼は「実労働に対する処罰」ではなく「執行停止」となった。
彼は、2010年10月末に中国に「強制送還」されました。
4人の中国人は「労働1年半の刑」および「処罰の罰金」となっていた
2010年8月頃までに。
彼らは「中断処刑」で中国に「強制送還」された。
万一に備えて
私と4人の中国人と中国のキングンガクは保護されていません
日本国憲法によって。

日本国憲法第十四条(法律による平等)第一項
「すべての市民は法の下で平等であり、政治的に差別されていない。
economic or social relations by race, creed, gender, social status or entrance."

Article 31 of the Constitution of Japan.
"No one shall be deprived of its life
or liberty unless it is in accordance with the procedures prescribed by law,
and no other punishment can be imposed."
"Procedure prescribed by law" refers to the law legislated in the Diet.

It is clearly contrary to "International Covenant
on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan. It is the following article.
Article 2 (1) (3), Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13,
Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17, Article
Article 26,

We have not committed any crime.
This is "False charges".

It is a crime of a police officer, a prosecutor, a judge in Japan.
Because the Japanese government will not accept it,
"condemnation" of the international community is necessary.

Even this, you can not understand?
Or do you have no justice?

I will continue on next week.
I will continue until you understand.


I "appeal" the two things.

It is "international" human rights violation by the Japanese government.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.

1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of illegal work with the Immigration Act 73-2
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "disposal" only foreigners, but they do not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.

If an employer who illegally employed a foreigner is innocent,
a foreigner who has worked illegally is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.

2. The "reason for crime" to which the prosecution applies "Article 62 of the Criminal Code,
 (crime of supporting other crimes)" is as follows.
Foreigners conducted the act prescribed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act
 (acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "Article 62 of the Penal Code,
(crime of supporting other crimes)" can not be applied.

The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Please "salvage" a lot of "victims" with "courage and justice".
I request the Japanese government to "recover honor"
被害者の「被害者を補償する」。

敬具長野康弘


それは以下のプログラムに開かれています。
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


助けて。
ご質問がありましたらご連絡ください。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

2025-01-14:ولهذا السبب فإنني أواصل القول بأن من الضروري قبول المهاجرين غير الشرعيين في "مكان معين" مثل "مخيم اللاجئين"، وتثقيفهم باللغة الإنجليزية وعادات الحياة، وإرسالهم إلى المجتمع الأميركي.

 2025-01-14: إصدار يوم الأسبوع. انتخب الشعب الأمريكي "الرئيس ترامب". يجب على الشعب الأمريكي أن يتحد لوقف تدفق المهاجرين غير الشرعي...