To President Trump
At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-05-23:Dear Sirs,I ask President Donald Trump. “The order of priority” of “applying law”
against “phenomenon (matter, event)” which points out that it is a crime takes “special law.”
Priority, yes. Japan gives priority to "General law".
The logic of law is crazy. Can the United States call Japan allies?
Part 1. The structure of "bill of indictment." Is as follows.
This part is written in Japanese original.
（Ａ）
第１ 中華人民共和国の国籍を有する外国人である張述輝ことヂャン シュホイが在留資格を
「尋問知識・国際業務」に変更し、。。。。
もって明らかに在留資格に応じた活動に属しない報酬を受ける活動を専ら行った際、
This part is writing the fact of violation of Article 70 (4)
of the Immigration Control Act of Chinese "Cyo Suki".
（Ｂ）
平成２０年１１月頃、前記ヂャンから依頼を受けて同人が資格外活動を行うことの情を知りながら、
東京都千代田区。。。。
在留期間（資格）更新許可申請書とともに前記内容虚偽の雇用契約書等を提出させて、
平成２２年３月２３日、同許可を得させ
This part has written the fact of "assistance" of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Please look at Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act. (English)
Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to a foreign national residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees as set forth in Article 61-2,
paragraph (1)), the Minister of Justice may revoke the foreign national's status
f residence in accordance with the procedures provided
for by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.
(v) In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the foreign national has received, by submitting or presenting a document
that contains a false entry (including a certificate pursuant to the provisions
of Article 7-2, paragraph (1), obtained by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry or a visa obtained for the passport
by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry),
or a drawing that contains a false entry, a seal of verification for landing.
In 2010, it was a representation of "False documents",
but now it is a representation of "Documents with false statements".
The penalties for the "Prosecution fact" of the "bill of indictmen" are clearly defined.
"The person himself" is "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation".
According to the Immigration Act implemented from July 1st, 2010,
foreigners who performed "assistance" are also "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation".
The priority of the applicable law is the "Special Act",
Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
So the prosecution can not "punish" "Assistant".
Please see the following site for details.
Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation abroad"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
