To everyone in the world. Sunday, May 26, 2019 Special Edition Sunday Edition: Greetings. The Democrat's “Chairman of the Nancy Peron,” says, “In history, most of the people who immigrated to this country want to say they are incompetent because they are not qualified as engineers?” Mrs. Melania Trump will get angry at the president! I think Mrs. Melania Trump is a great "migrant".

To everyone in the world.

Sunday, May 26, 2019 Special Edition Sunday Edition:

Greetings. The Democrat's “Chairman of the Nancy Peron,” says, “In history, most of the people who immigrated to this country want to say they are incompetent because they are not qualified as engineers?” Mrs. Melania Trump will get angry at the president! I think Mrs. Melania Trump is a great "migrant".

Part 1. The United States needs a "special zone".

We accept "poor people" as "temporary immigration" in "special zones" from Central and South America.

President Donald Trump says that "illegal immigration" is dangerous.

"Temporary immigration" works as a "simple worker" (skills apprentice) at a "special zone" factory.

Their wages are based on the minimum wage.

By securing low-wage workers, US companies will be able to compete better than Chinese companies.

Family members should be allowed to live in the "special zone" together.

For a certain period of time, living in the "special zone", "temporary immigrants" that have been identified as safe should give the right to live in the United States as regular "labor migrants".

Today's small businesses in the United States need "illegal immigration".

If "temporary immigration" can be employed as a formal "labor migrant", small and medium-sized enterprises can survive.

Of course, "Trump golf course" can also survive.

I think that the United States should accept more than 100 million people as "temporary immigration".

That is the economic effect of "the degree" of "absorbing Japan".

US farmers can sell to the US without having to export to China.

US agriculture is freed from China and Japan "unconstrained".

The "special zone" "factory" is mainly a "labor intensive" factory.

The existing industrial area is connected with the "supply chain".

To that end, the "Rust Belt" "factory" should be "the latest equipment" with "scrap & build".

The city of "Rust Belt" gets back "lively" with many workers.

Of course, "company" of "United States Allies" works with "factory in special zone" through "supply chain".

The United States will once again become the "factory of the world."

Latin American countries that send out "temporary immigrants" are also enriched by their "remittances".

As the US market grows, the international community "co-operates" with the United States.

It will continue next week.

Part 2. We propose to build "special zones" in each country, including Europe.

Please read along with the proposal for the United States (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see.

The prosperity of each country is realized by the freedom, democracy and "ruled under the law" of the world.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please direct the concerned parties to investigate.

Materials submitted to the ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose the name and the required items.

If you have any questions please email me.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world May 25, 2019 Special Zone Saturday Edition: Dear Sirs, US President Trump has announced a "capability-based" "immigration scheme" proposal. Democratic Party Speaker Nancy Pelosi "dismiss" President Trump's plan "not useful." I agree. Part 1. The title of "1600daily" of White House is "President Trump just proposed the most pro-immigrant, pro-America immigration plan in history". This is "say too much." Recent President Donald Trump has no "sharpness" in solving problems.

To everyone in the world

May 25, 2019 Special Zone Saturday Edition:

Dear Sirs, US President Trump has announced a "capability-based" "immigration scheme" proposal.

Democratic Party Speaker Nancy Pelosi "dismiss" President Trump's plan "not useful." I agree.

Part 1. The title of "1600daily" of White House is "President Trump just proposed the most pro-immigrant, pro-America immigration plan in history".

This is "say too much."

Recent President Donald Trump has no "sharpness" in solving problems.

"1600 daily" says,

The only thing that is opposed to the "safe and powerful immigration control system" is the "special benefit that is gaining from the current situation.

This includes all politicians who benefit from not solving the problem, as well as everyone in the company that is cheap and exploits the illegal labor.

What President Donald Trump says is "right."

But "President Donald Trump" is not qualified to say that.

The Washington Post announced that "Trump Golf Club" employed "illegal immigrants."

However, I have no desire to pursue "Donald Trump, US President".

"US President Donald Trump" employed "illegal immigrants" for "for the United States" as "Another face manager".

Because there are 16 million to 22 million "illegal immigrants" in the United States, and there are "facts" that are contributing to the US economy.

In the United States, the economy is supported by "illegal immigration."

"Unauthorized immigration" has not robbed the "work" of Americans.

It is "China" that robs Americans of their work.

But this time, he says he will accept "a good Chinese engineer who can speak English".

Chinese will steal to "US advanced technology" and return home.

"Doesn't learn American!"

Human resources that the United States needs now are foreigners who work at low wages in the "3K" field that Americans dislike.

I have proposed a "special zone" for that purpose.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. To the United States, I "propose" to build a "special zone" along the border with Mexico.

April 13, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: Please see.

The reality of Japan's immigration policy is worse than in the United States.

Japanese immigration law is similar to American immigration law.

The prosperity of America is realized by freedom, democracy, and "ruled under the law" in the world.

I seriously seek the rule of law. Please direct the concerned parties to investigate.

There are also many American victims.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/POTD-May-23-1200x800.jpg

Materials submitted to the ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose the name and the required items.

If you have any questions please email me.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Dear Sirs International people. Saturday version, 25 May 2019:Dear Sirs, On the 14th, the United States did "embargo on the export" for "Huawei" because "Huawei" violated US law. Each country should put an end to the introduction of "Huawei 5G products", considering the "5G" health damage seriously.

Dear Sirs International people.


Saturday version, 25 May 2019:Dear Sirs, On the 14th,
the United States did "embargo on the export"
for "Huawei" because "Huawei" violated US law.
Each country should put an end to the introduction of "Huawei 5G products",
considering the "5G" health damage seriously.


Part 1. On May 15, the US Department of Commerce added China's Huawei
and its 68 associated companies to its Industrial Safety Bureau (BIS) 's "Entity List."
In effect, it is an "embargo".
The addition of Huawei and its 68 related companies to the Entity List is cited
as a violation of the International Emergency Economic Power Act,
such as the provision of financial services to Iran,
and the company's obstruction to the investigation.
However, after that,
the US administration of Trump stated that it would reverse the policy of export control
for China's telecommunications equipment giant (Huawei) from the initial policy,
and give some relief.

With the embargo launched by the Trump administration in the United States,
Google has announced a policy to discontinue Android OS support for Huawei except
for "existing devices". And in Japan,
"Au" and "Y Mobile" will postpone the launch of Huawei smartphones "HUAWEI P30 lite"
and "HUAWEI P30 lite Premium".
Initially, it was scheduled for release in late May,
but the new release date is "not yet determined."
Since Japan is an "Allied Party" signed with the United States
under the "Japan-US Security Treaty", I think it is natural to "follow" US security.

What I want to say today is not this.
"Huawei" leads the world in commercialization of "5G".
Japan tried "5G" "propulsion" with "Huawei" product,
but has been suspended at the request of the United States.
I'm against using “Huawei” products as it means getting
under the control of the Chinese government.
I am opposed to "propulsion" the "5G" product itself.
In Japan, the introduction of “5G” is being carried out as an established fact,
without any research on health effects etc. being conducted.

Many American citizens call "smart meters" "electromagnetic weapons".
Three years ago in France, a bill was finally enacted that prohibits the use
of Wi-Fi in children's facilities.
Continued exposure to Wi-Fi electromagnetic waves causes "serious" health hazards.
France warns against excessive Wi-Fi use.
The movement of Wi-Fi regulation is now spreading to Belgium,
Spain, Israel, Australia, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Austria,
India, Finland, Cyprus, etc.

Dr. Blank, Columbia University,
has called on the United Nations to "suppress the installation of the 5G tower"
and is concerned about electromagnetic waves, reproductive function,
and the risk of developing brain tumors.
Japan's attitude toward 5G is questioned from now on.
Not only Japan, but the G7 countries should seriously consider "commercialization" of "5G system".
France, a human rights state, should lead the world in "preventing" "health damage" from "5G".

Part 2. There are many Koreans who have been arrested
for immigration law violations in violation of international law.
(I can not count).
Koreans, Chinese, Filipinos, "everyone" all over the world!
Help the victims of the Japanese government around you!

The victims are foreigners who "worked illegally"
in activities other than "Certificate of residence" in Japan.
They were arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act and
We have received "criminal punishment" such as "a penalty sentence".
And they are foreigners who have been forced to repatriate.

We arrest a third party for "supporting" the aforementioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is me or "Kin Gungaku who is Chinese".
Other victims are officials from the Embassy of the Philippines
and diplomats from the Philippines.
I think there are more victims, but I do not know the information.

It is a third party who has handed out the “contract documents
for employment” to foreigners who have “illegal labor”.
It has nothing to do with "illegal labor."
The prosecution says in Indictment:

I gave a foreigner "Employment Contract Documents with False Content".
Foreigners were able to easily obtain the status of residence
by attaching “Employment Contract Documents with False Content”.
Foreigners came to live in Japan because they got “Certificate of residence”.
Foreigners were able to do "illegal labor" because they were in Japan.
Therefore, as a crime against Article 70 "illegal labor"
of the immigration control law of foreigners,
We apply "the crime that supported other crimes" of "Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code".

"Sins of support" for Article 70 "illegal labor" of the Immigration Control Act
It prescribes in "the crime which promotes unlawful work".

The "crime reasons" of the prosecution are stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Act "Revocation of Status of Residence by Filing False Documents".
There is no punishment for that. Only the status of residence is cancelled.
And "forced repatriation" will be.

Even if you get a status of residence in "false documents",
It is not "illegal labor" if it works within the scope of the status of residence.
The application of Article 62 and Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
and the Philippine diplomat is an error of the "applicable law".
This is the perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the governments and media of each country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "restoration of honor" and "reparations".

If governments and embassies can not protest the Japanese government,
request an investigation from the ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support "Appeal to ICC".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translated document is incorrect,
please contact us by email.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Nagano Yoshihiro



https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/POTD-May-23-1200x800.jpg

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-05-24:Dear Sirs, I would like to ask President Emmanuel Macron. Let Mr. Carlos Gone take "the right trial in a civilized country". Since Japan is the "judicial structure" of the "Army era", "the guilty rate is 99.9%".

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-05-24:Dear Sirs, I would like to ask President Emmanuel Macron.
Let Mr. Carlos Gone take "the right trial in a civilized country".
Since Japan is the "judicial structure" of the "Army era", "the guilty rate is 99.9%".


Part 1. The explanation based on the "document of judgment" will be explained
from 27th to 31st of next week.
Judges apply the "Criminal Code" by asserting that the "Criminal Code"
of the General Law takes precedence over "the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) Article".
However, it is clear that the "criminal facts" of "bill of indictment."
Are Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Beyond the border, the world's "logic of law" is "Common".
The judge will be the "Friend" of the prosecutor.
This is described in the past, but in Japan before 1945,
the judges and the prosecutors were systematically "One body".
So it is still "One body".
So, forcibly, I issue "Judgment" in the prosecutor's scenario.
1) The Chinese were able to easily obtain the "status of residence"
in the "False employment contract".
2) Chinese were able to obtain "status of residence".
So, Chinese could live in Japan.
3) Chinese were able to live in Japan, and were able to do "illegal labor".
4) Therefore, "Causality" is "obvious" between the "Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act"
and the "Support act" of the Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

This way of thinking has not changed yet.
I think it is an embarrassing logic of "Japan justice".

Police officers, prosecutors and judges do not understand the Immigration Act.
1) Even if the status of residence is easily obtained by a false employment contract document,
labor within the scope of the status of residence is not a violation
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
If it is the case, the status of residence will be cancelled,
and only "forced repatriation" will be made pursuant to Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
(There is no criminal action) (It is an order of the Minister of Justice).

2) Even if you obtain a status of residence at the discretion of the Minister
of Justice based on the "false employment contract documents", there are the following.
The “stay visa” is issued by the Foreign Minister at the discretion.
There are many cases where you can not obtain a “Residential Visa” even
if you get “Certificate of Residence”.
The Foreign Minister will not disclose the reasons for not issuing a "Visa".

3) The “employment contract document” is not a duty to submit by law.
Even the Ministry of Justice's "Ministerial Ordinance" is not.
It is submitted "optionally" at the request of the department manager
in charge of the Ministry of Justice.
Therefore, under Article 31 of the Constitution,
it is not possible to punish for "documents of contract of employment" being "false".

So police and prosecutors can not say "the logic of law",
they say to me:
"You should admit crimes in general."
Japan punishes the correct Japanese as "general theory".

So I am worried about the trial of "Carlos Gone".
Japan has a judicial administration with the same structure as the era of military rule
in Japan, so the "guilty rate" is 99.9%.

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-05-24:Dear Sirs, I would like to ask President Emmanuel Macron.

To President Trump


At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-05-24:Dear Sirs, I would like to ask President Emmanuel Macron.
Let Mr. Carlos Gone take "the right trial in a civilized country".
Since Japan is the "judicial structure" of the "Army era", "the guilty rate is 99.9%".


Part 1. The explanation based on the "document of judgment" will be explained
from 27th to 31st of next week.
Judges apply the "Criminal Code" by asserting that the "Criminal Code"
of the General Law takes precedence over "the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) Article".
However, it is clear that the "criminal facts" of "bill of indictment."
Are Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Beyond the border, the world's "logic of law" is "Common".
The judge will be the "Friend" of the prosecutor.
This is described in the past, but in Japan before 1945,
the judges and the prosecutors were systematically "One body".
So it is still "One body".
So, forcibly, I issue "Judgment" in the prosecutor's scenario.
1) The Chinese were able to easily obtain the "status of residence"
in the "False employment contract".
2) Chinese were able to obtain "status of residence".
So, Chinese could live in Japan.
3) Chinese were able to live in Japan, and were able to do "illegal labor".
4) Therefore, "Causality" is "obvious" between the "Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act"
and the "Support act" of the Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

This way of thinking has not changed yet.
I think it is an embarrassing logic of "Japan justice".

Police officers, prosecutors and judges do not understand the Immigration Act.
1) Even if the status of residence is easily obtained by a false employment contract document,
labor within the scope of the status of residence is not a violation
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
If it is the case, the status of residence will be cancelled,
and only "forced repatriation" will be made pursuant to Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
(There is no criminal action) (It is an order of the Minister of Justice).

2) Even if you obtain a status of residence at the discretion of the Minister
of Justice based on the "false employment contract documents", there are the following.
The “stay visa” is issued by the Foreign Minister at the discretion.
There are many cases where you can not obtain a “Residential Visa” even
if you get “Certificate of Residence”.
The Foreign Minister will not disclose the reasons for not issuing a "Visa".

3) The “employment contract document” is not a duty to submit by law.
Even the Ministry of Justice's "Ministerial Ordinance" is not.
It is submitted "optionally" at the request of the department manager
in charge of the Ministry of Justice.
Therefore, under Article 31 of the Constitution,
it is not possible to punish for "documents of contract of employment" being "false".

So police and prosecutors can not say "the logic of law",
they say to me:
"You should admit crimes in general."
Japan punishes the correct Japanese as "general theory".

So I am worried about the trial of "Carlos Gone".
Japan has a judicial administration with the same structure as the era of military rule
in Japan, so the "guilty rate" is 99.9%.

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-05-24: Cher Monsieur, je voudrais demander au président Emmanuel Macron. Laissons M. Carlos Gone faire "le bon procès dans un pays civilisé". Le Japon étant la "structure judiciaire" de "l'époque de l'armée", "le taux de culpabilité est de 99,9%".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-05-24: Cher Monsieur, je voudrais demander au président Emmanuel Macron.
Laissons M. Carlos Gone faire "le bon procès dans un pays civilisé".
Le Japon étant la "structure judiciaire" de "l'époque de l'armée", "le taux de culpabilité est de 99,9%".


Partie 1 L'explication basée sur le "document de jugement" sera expliquée du 27 au 31 de la semaine prochaine.
Les juges appliquent le "code pénal" en affirmant que le "code pénal" de la loi générale prime sur "la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4- (4)".
Cependant, il est clair que les "faits criminels" d'un "acte d'accusation" sont l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.
Au-delà de la frontière, la "logique du droit" dans le monde est "commune".
Le juge sera "l'ami" du procureur.
Ceci est décrit dans le passé, mais au Japon avant 1945, les juges et les procureurs étaient systématiquement "un seul corps".
Donc, c'est toujours "Un corps".
Donc, de force, je publie "Jugement" dans le scénario du procureur.
1) Les Chinois ont pu facilement obtenir le "statut de résidence" dans le "faux contrat de travail".
2) Les Chinois ont pu obtenir un "statut de résidence". Ainsi, les Chinois pourraient vivre au Japon.
3) Les Chinois ont pu vivre au Japon et ont pu faire du "travail illégal".
4) Par conséquent, avec "l'article 70 de la Loi sur l'immigration, article 4"
La "causalité" est "évidente" avec "loi de soutien" en vertu de l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Cette façon de penser n'a pas encore changé.
Je pense que c'est une logique embarrassante de "justice japonaise".

Les policiers, les procureurs et les juges ne comprennent pas la loi sur l'immigration.
1) Même si le statut de résidence est facilement obtenu par de faux documents de contrat de travail,
S'il s'agit d'un travail relevant du statut de résidence, cela ne constitue pas une violation de l'article 70 (4) de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Si c’est un fait, les dispositions de l’article 22-4- 4) de la loi sur l’immigration
Le statut de résidence est simplement annulé et expulsé. (Il n'y a pas d'action pénale) (C'est un arrêté du ministre de la justice).

2) Même si vous obtenez un statut de résidence à la discrétion du ministre de la Justice sur la base des "faux documents du contrat de travail", il existe les éléments suivants.
Le «visa de séjour» est délivré par le ministre des Affaires étrangères à la discrétion.
Il existe de nombreux cas où vous ne pouvez pas obtenir un «visa résidentiel» même si vous obtenez un «certificat de résidence».
Le ministre des Affaires étrangères ne dévoilera pas les raisons pour lesquelles il n’a pas délivré de "visa".

3) Le «document de contrat de travail» n'est pas une obligation légale.
Même l'ordonnance ministérielle du ministère de la Justice ne l'est pas.
Il est présenté "facultativement" à la demande du chef de département chargé du ministère de la Justice.
Par conséquent, selon l’article 31 de la Constitution, "les documents du contrat de travail" sont "faux",
Vous ne pouvez pas punir.

Donc, la police et les procureurs ne peuvent pas dire "la logique du droit", ils me disent:
"Vous devriez admettre les crimes en général."
Le Japon punit le japonais correct en tant que "théorie générale".

Je suis donc inquiet pour le procès de "Carlos Gone".
Le Japon a une administration judiciaire avec la même structure que dans l'ère de "règle par l'armée", de sorte que les procureurs et les juges
Le "taux de culpabilité" est de 99,9%.

Veuillez vérifier les lois d'immigration énumérées ci-dessus (en anglais) ci-dessous.
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Article 70 du code pénal et "péchés au soutien d'autres crimes" du code pénal pour l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
"Appliquer" est "fou".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration, veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-05-24: Sehr geehrter Herr, ich möchte Präsident Emmanuel Macron fragen. Lassen Sie Herrn Carlos Gone "den richtigen Prozess in einem zivilisierten Land" machen. Da Japan die "Rechtsstruktur" der "Armee-Ära" ist, "liegt die Schuldquote bei 99,9%"

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-05-24: Sehr geehrter Herr, ich möchte Präsident Emmanuel Macron fragen.
Lassen Sie Herrn Carlos Gone "den richtigen Prozess in einem zivilisierten Land" machen.
Da Japan die "Rechtsstruktur" der "Armee-Ära" ist, "liegt die Schuldquote bei 99,9%".


Teil 1. Die auf der "Urkunde" basierende Erklärung wird vom 27. bis 31. der nächsten Woche erklärt.
Die Richter wenden das "Strafgesetzbuch" an, indem sie geltend machen, dass das "Strafgesetzbuch" des Allgemeinen Gesetzes Vorrang vor dem "Immigrationskontrollgesetz 22-4- (4) Artikel" hat.
Es ist jedoch klar, dass die "kriminellen Tatsachen" der "Anklageschrift" Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes sind.
Jenseits der Grenze ist die "Logik des Rechts" der Welt "allgemein".
Der Richter wird der "Freund" des Anklägers sein.
Dies ist in der Vergangenheit beschrieben worden, aber in Japan waren die Richter und Staatsanwälte vor 1945 systematisch "eine Stelle".
Es ist also immer noch "Ein Körper".
Aus diesem Grund stelle ich im Szenario der Staatsanwaltschaft mit Gewalt ein "Urteil" aus.
1) Die Chinesen konnten problemlos den "Aufenthaltsstatus" im "falschen Arbeitsvertrag" erlangen.
2) Chinesen konnten "Aufenthaltsstatus" erlangen. Chinesen könnten also in Japan leben.
3) Chinesen konnten in Japan leben und "illegale Arbeit" verrichten.
4) Daher mit "dem Einwanderungsgesetz 70 (4) Artikel"
Die "Kausalität" ist beim "Unterstützungsgesetz" nach Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "offensichtlich".

Diese Denkweise hat sich noch nicht geändert.
Ich denke, es ist eine peinliche Logik der "japanischen Gerechtigkeit".

Polizeibeamte, Staatsanwälte und Richter verstehen das Einwanderungsgesetz nicht.
1) Auch wenn der Aufenthaltsstatus leicht durch falsche Arbeitsvertragsunterlagen erlangt werden kann,
Wenn es sich um Arbeit im Rahmen des Aufenthaltsstatus handelt, liegt kein Verstoß gegen § 70 Abs. 4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes vor.
Wenn es eine Tatsache ist, die Bestimmungen von Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Der Aufenthaltsstatus wird einfach annulliert und abgeschoben. (Es gibt keine strafrechtliche Handlung) (Es ist eine Anordnung des Justizministers).

2) Auch wenn Sie nach Ermessen des Justizministers einen Aufenthaltsstatus aufgrund der "falschen Arbeitsvertragsunterlagen" erhalten, gibt es Folgendes.
Das „Aufenthaltsvisum“ wird vom Außenminister nach eigenem Ermessen ausgestellt.
Es gibt viele Fälle, in denen Sie kein "Resident Visa" erhalten, auch wenn Sie eine "Certificate of Residence" erhalten.
Der Außenminister wird die Gründe für die Nichterteilung eines "Visums" nicht bekannt geben.

3) Das „Arbeitsvertragsformular“ ist keine gesetzliche Vorlagepflicht.
Nicht einmal die "Ministerialverordnung" des Justizministeriums.
Es wird "optional" auf Antrag des für das Justizministerium zuständigen Abteilungsleiters eingereicht.
Nach Artikel 31 der Verfassung sind "Dokumente des Arbeitsvertrags" daher "falsch".
Sie können nicht bestrafen.

So können Polizei und Staatsanwaltschaft nicht "die Logik des Gesetzes" sagen, sie sagen zu mir:
"Sie sollten Verbrechen im Allgemeinen zugeben."
Japan bestraft den korrekten Japaner als "allgemeine Theorie".

Ich mache mir also Sorgen um den Prozess gegen "Carlos Gone".
Japan hat eine Justizverwaltung mit der gleichen Struktur wie in der Ära der "Militärherrschaft", so Staatsanwälte und Richter
Die "Schuldquote" liegt bei 99,9%.

Bitte überprüfen Sie die oben aufgeführten Einwanderungsgesetze (in englischer Sprache).
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1 Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2 Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 70 des Strafgesetzbuchs und "Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" des Strafgesetzbuchs für Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
"Bewerben" ist "verrückt".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall von Verstößen gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden, unterstützen Sie bitte den "Appell" an den "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-05-24:Dear Sirs, I would like to ask President Emmanuel Macron. Let Mr. Carlos Gone take "the right trial in a civilized country". Since Japan is the "judicial structure" of the "Army era", "the guilty rate is 99.9%".

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-05-24:Dear Sirs, I would like to ask President Emmanuel Macron.
Let Mr. Carlos Gone take "the right trial in a civilized country".
Since Japan is the "judicial structure" of the "Army era", "the guilty rate is 99.9%".


Part 1. The explanation based on the "document of judgment" will be explained
from 27th to 31st of next week.
Judges apply the "Criminal Code" by asserting that the "Criminal Code"
of the General Law takes precedence over "the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) Article".
However, it is clear that the "criminal facts" of "bill of indictment."
Are Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Beyond the border, the world's "logic of law" is "Common".
The judge will be the "Friend" of the prosecutor.
This is described in the past, but in Japan before 1945,
the judges and the prosecutors were systematically "One body".
So it is still "One body".
So, forcibly, I issue "Judgment" in the prosecutor's scenario.
1) The Chinese were able to easily obtain the "status of residence"
in the "False employment contract".
2) Chinese were able to obtain "status of residence".
So, Chinese could live in Japan.
3) Chinese were able to live in Japan, and were able to do "illegal labor".
4) Therefore, "Causality" is "obvious" between the "Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act"
and the "Support act" of the Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

This way of thinking has not changed yet.
I think it is an embarrassing logic of "Japan justice".

Police officers, prosecutors and judges do not understand the Immigration Act.
1) Even if the status of residence is easily obtained by a false employment contract document,
labor within the scope of the status of residence is not a violation
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
If it is the case, the status of residence will be cancelled,
and only "forced repatriation" will be made pursuant to Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
(There is no criminal action) (It is an order of the Minister of Justice).

2) Even if you obtain a status of residence at the discretion of the Minister
of Justice based on the "false employment contract documents", there are the following.
The “stay visa” is issued by the Foreign Minister at the discretion.
There are many cases where you can not obtain a “Residential Visa” even
if you get “Certificate of Residence”.
The Foreign Minister will not disclose the reasons for not issuing a "Visa".

3) The “employment contract document” is not a duty to submit by law.
Even the Ministry of Justice's "Ministerial Ordinance" is not.
It is submitted "optionally" at the request of the department manager
in charge of the Ministry of Justice.
Therefore, under Article 31 of the Constitution,
it is not possible to punish for "documents of contract of employment" being "false".

So police and prosecutors can not say "the logic of law",
they say to me:
"You should admit crimes in general."
Japan punishes the correct Japanese as "general theory".

So I am worried about the trial of "Carlos Gone".
Japan has a judicial administration with the same structure as the era of military rule
in Japan, so the "guilty rate" is 99.9%.

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

2019-05-24:Dear Sirs, I would like to ask President Emmanuel Macron. Let Mr. Carlos Gone take "the right trial in a civilized country". Since Japan is the "judicial structure" of the "Army era", "the guilty rate is 99.9%".

2019-05-24:Dear Sirs, I would like to ask President Emmanuel Macron.
Let Mr. Carlos Gone take "the right trial in a civilized country".
Since Japan is the "judicial structure" of the "Army era", "the guilty rate is 99.9%".


Part 1. The explanation based on the "document of judgment" will be explained
from 27th to 31st of next week.
Judges apply the "Criminal Code" by asserting that the "Criminal Code"
of the General Law takes precedence over "the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) Article".
However, it is clear that the "criminal facts" of "bill of indictment."
Are Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Beyond the border, the world's "logic of law" is "Common".
The judge will be the "Friend" of the prosecutor.
This is described in the past, but in Japan before 1945,
the judges and the prosecutors were systematically "One body".
So it is still "One body".
So, forcibly, I issue "Judgment" in the prosecutor's scenario.
1) The Chinese were able to easily obtain the "status of residence"
in the "False employment contract".
2) Chinese were able to obtain "status of residence".
So, Chinese could live in Japan.
3) Chinese were able to live in Japan, and were able to do "illegal labor".
4) Therefore, "Causality" is "obvious" between the "Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act"
and the "Support act" of the Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

This way of thinking has not changed yet.
I think it is an embarrassing logic of "Japan justice".

Police officers, prosecutors and judges do not understand the Immigration Act.
1) Even if the status of residence is easily obtained by a false employment contract document,
labor within the scope of the status of residence is not a violation
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
If it is the case, the status of residence will be cancelled,
and only "forced repatriation" will be made pursuant to Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
(There is no criminal action) (It is an order of the Minister of Justice).

2) Even if you obtain a status of residence at the discretion of the Minister
of Justice based on the "false employment contract documents", there are the following.
The “stay visa” is issued by the Foreign Minister at the discretion.
There are many cases where you can not obtain a “Residential Visa” even
if you get “Certificate of Residence”.
The Foreign Minister will not disclose the reasons for not issuing a "Visa".

3) The “employment contract document” is not a duty to submit by law.
Even the Ministry of Justice's "Ministerial Ordinance" is not.
It is submitted "optionally" at the request of the department manager
in charge of the Ministry of Justice.
Therefore, under Article 31 of the Constitution,
it is not possible to punish for "documents of contract of employment" being "false".

So police and prosecutors can not say "the logic of law",
they say to me:
"You should admit crimes in general."
Japan punishes the correct Japanese as "general theory".

So I am worried about the trial of "Carlos Gone".
Japan has a judicial administration with the same structure as the era of military rule
in Japan, so the "guilty rate" is 99.9%.

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-05-23:Dear Sirs,I ask President Donald Trump. “The order of priority” of “applying law” against “phenomenon (matter, event)” which points out that it is a crime takes “special law.” Priority, yes. Japan gives priority to "General law". The logic of law is crazy. Can the United States call Japan allies?

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-05-23:Dear Sirs,I ask President Donald Trump. “The order of priority” of “applying law”
against “phenomenon (matter, event)” which points out that it is a crime takes “special law.”
Priority, yes. Japan gives priority to "General law".
The logic of law is crazy. Can the United States call Japan allies?


Part 1. The structure of "bill of indictment." Is as follows.
This part is written in Japanese original.

（Ａ）
第１　中華人民共和国の国籍を有する外国人である張述輝ことヂャン　シュホイが在留資格を
「尋問知識・国際業務」に変更し、。。。。

もって明らかに在留資格に応じた活動に属しない報酬を受ける活動を専ら行った際、

This part is writing the fact of violation of Article 70 (4)
of the Immigration Control Act of Chinese "Cyo Suki".

（Ｂ）
平成２０年１１月頃、前記ヂャンから依頼を受けて同人が資格外活動を行うことの情を知りながら、
東京都千代田区。。。。


在留期間（資格）更新許可申請書とともに前記内容虚偽の雇用契約書等を提出させて、
平成２２年３月２３日、同許可を得させ

This part has written the fact of "assistance" of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.


Please look at Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act. (English)

Article 22-4　(1)　Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to a foreign national residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
 (except for those recognized as refugees as set forth in Article 61-2,
 paragraph (1)), the Minister of Justice may revoke the foreign national's status
 f residence in accordance with the procedures provided
 for by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.
(v) In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the foreign national has received, by submitting or presenting a document
that contains a false entry (including a certificate pursuant to the provisions
of Article 7-2, paragraph (1), obtained by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry or a visa obtained for the passport
by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry),
or a drawing that contains a false entry, a seal of verification for landing.

In 2010, it was a representation of "False documents",
but now it is a representation of "Documents with false statements".


The penalties for the "Prosecution fact" of the "bill of indictmen" are clearly defined.
"The person himself" is "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation".
According to the Immigration Act implemented from July 1st, 2010,
foreigners who performed "assistance" are also "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation".
The priority of the applicable law is the "Special Act",
Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
So the prosecution can not "punish" "Assistant".


Please see the following site for details.
Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation abroad"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-05-23:Dear Sirs,I ask President Donald Trump. “The order of priority” of “applying law”

To President Trump


At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-05-23:Dear Sirs,I ask President Donald Trump. “The order of priority” of “applying law”
against “phenomenon (matter, event)” which points out that it is a crime takes “special law.”
Priority, yes. Japan gives priority to "General law".
The logic of law is crazy. Can the United States call Japan allies?


Part 1. The structure of "bill of indictment." Is as follows.
This part is written in Japanese original.

（Ａ）
第１　中華人民共和国の国籍を有する外国人である張述輝ことヂャン　シュホイが在留資格を
「尋問知識・国際業務」に変更し、。。。。

もって明らかに在留資格に応じた活動に属しない報酬を受ける活動を専ら行った際、

This part is writing the fact of violation of Article 70 (4)
of the Immigration Control Act of Chinese "Cyo Suki".

（Ｂ）
平成２０年１１月頃、前記ヂャンから依頼を受けて同人が資格外活動を行うことの情を知りながら、
東京都千代田区。。。。


在留期間（資格）更新許可申請書とともに前記内容虚偽の雇用契約書等を提出させて、
平成２２年３月２３日、同許可を得させ

This part has written the fact of "assistance" of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.


Please look at Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act. (English)

Article 22-4　(1)　Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to a foreign national residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
 (except for those recognized as refugees as set forth in Article 61-2,
 paragraph (1)), the Minister of Justice may revoke the foreign national's status
 f residence in accordance with the procedures provided
 for by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.
(v) In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the foreign national has received, by submitting or presenting a document
that contains a false entry (including a certificate pursuant to the provisions
of Article 7-2, paragraph (1), obtained by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry or a visa obtained for the passport
by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry),
or a drawing that contains a false entry, a seal of verification for landing.

In 2010, it was a representation of "False documents",
but now it is a representation of "Documents with false statements".


The penalties for the "Prosecution fact" of the "bill of indictmen" are clearly defined.
"The person himself" is "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation".
According to the Immigration Act implemented from July 1st, 2010,
foreigners who performed "assistance" are also "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation".
The priority of the applicable law is the "Special Act",
Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
So the prosecution can not "punish" "Assistant".


Please see the following site for details.
Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence" and "deportation abroad"
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************