To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-14:Dear Sirs, Immigration Act is changed every year. In 2014-2015, if the prosecutor's "indictment letter" is a fact, embassy officials and diplomats are the acts of "support" under Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act. In this case, the Minister of Justice will perform "administrative disposition". Therefore, embassy staff and diplomats should seek "recovery of honor" and "reparations".

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-06-14:Dear Sirs, Immigration Act is changed every year.
In 2014-2015, if the prosecutor's "indictment letter" is a fact,
embassy officials and diplomats are the acts of "support"
under Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act. In this case,
the Minister of Justice will perform "administrative disposition".
Therefore, embassy staff and diplomats should seek "recovery of honor" and "reparations".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. In order to properly deal with illegal work promotion activities, etc.
We strengthened "reason" of deportation pertaining to cancellation
of nonqualification activity permission

This cancellation system has been in force since July 1, 2010,
with the new deportation "reasons" to deal
with illegal labor promotion activities more accurately.

You will be deported if you conduct an act that encourages
or assists the creation of false documents etc.

Deportation "reasons", etc., to properly deal
with illegal labor promotion are also effective from July 1, 2010.
As a new deportation "reason", the following thing is added,
and the provision concerning the rescission
of the non-qualification activity permit is established.

A) The act of "provoking" or "helping" the preparation of false alteration documents etc.
for the purpose of making other foreigners unfairly "landing permits" etc.
I) Having carried out illegal work promotion activities.
U) Having been sentenced to imprisonment or more for the indemnity activities.
Note: Currently integrated into Article 24 (Deportation Forced).

The Immigration Act is clearly defined.
The following will be conducted at the discretion of the Minister of Justice.
1) Status of residence is cancelled.
2) If the status of residence is revoked, it will be "deported".

Before June 2010, nothing will be disposed of.
So the above provision was legislated.
It is a crime when "special civil servants" such as police officers
and prosecutors perform the following acts.
If the "special civil servant" arrests or imprisons a person
who does not violate the law, it will be "a crime of abuse of authority
by a special civil servant" under the criminal law.
There is no need for "intention" as "crime composition requirements" of this "law".
"Cite a precedent of the Supreme Court".
It can not be said that police officers and prosecutors "do not know the law."

It will continue next week.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Act on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-06-13:Dear Sirs, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not do "illegal labor". They were criminalized for their support of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act. This disposition is illegal. Therefore, it is "false charge". You should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor" and compensation.

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-06-13:Dear Sirs, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not do "illegal labor".
They were criminalized for their support of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
This disposition is illegal. Therefore, it is "false charge".
You should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor" and compensation.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) "Cancellation of Status of Residence".
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Or, because there are not a few things that interfere with fair immigration control,
such as illegal work without committing the status of residence status or committing a crime,
there are a number of factors that prevent illegal work.
In order to
In a partial revision of the Immigration Control Act of 2004,
the "cancellation of status of residence" (Article 22-4) system was established
 (enforced on December 2 of the same year).

The Minister of Justice may cancel the status of residence held
by a foreigner if any of the following facts are found.
(1) In the case of receiving a seal of landing permission,
for example, by falsely determining the immigration examiner's decision
on landing refusal status by false or other fraudulent means.
2 False or other fraudulent means, if the activity to be conducted
in Japan is falsified and the landing permit is received.
For example, if a person who intends to do simple work
in Japan declares that he / she will carry out an activity
that falls under the status of residence of "Technology",
this item is subject to cancellation under this issue.
3 If the applicant forged a fact other than the activity
that the applicant intends to carry out
in Japan and received a seal of landing permission, etc.
For example,
a case in which the applicant misrepresents his / her career is subject to cancellation
under this issue.
4 In cases other than 1 to 3, where false documents are submitted
and you receive a seal of landing permission. In this issue, there is no requirement
for false or other fraudulent means, and the applicant is willing. I do not need to.
5 If you have not continued the activities related to your status of residence
(limited to the status of residence (Note) in the upper column of Schedule 1
of the Immigration Control Act) for more than 3 months
(but do not perform such activities. There is a good reason for that,
except in the case. In addition, in revoking the status of residence,
it is decided to hear the opinion from targeted foreigners in advance.
Note: false fake documents are now changed to false documents.
The Immigration Control Act is revised every year,
so the content and expression have changed.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-13:Dear Sirs, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not do "illegal labor".
They were criminalized for their support of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
This disposition is illegal. Therefore, it is "false charge".
You should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor" and compensation.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) "Cancellation of Status of Residence".
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Or, because there are not a few things that interfere with fair immigration control,
such as illegal work without committing the status of residence status or committing a crime,
there are a number of factors that prevent illegal work.
In order to
In a partial revision of the Immigration Control Act of 2004,
the "cancellation of status of residence" (Article 22-4) system was established
 (enforced on December 2 of the same year).

The Minister of Justice may cancel the status of residence held
by a foreigner if any of the following facts are found.
(1) In the case of receiving a seal of landing permission,
for example, by falsely determining the immigration examiner's decision
on landing refusal status by false or other fraudulent means.
2 False or other fraudulent means, if the activity to be conducted
in Japan is falsified and the landing permit is received.
For example, if a person who intends to do simple work
in Japan declares that he / she will carry out an activity
that falls under the status of residence of "Technology",
this item is subject to cancellation under this issue.
3 If the applicant forged a fact other than the activity
that the applicant intends to carry out
in Japan and received a seal of landing permission, etc.
For example,
a case in which the applicant misrepresents his / her career is subject to cancellation
under this issue.
4 In cases other than 1 to 3, where false documents are submitted
and you receive a seal of landing permission. In this issue, there is no requirement
for false or other fraudulent means, and the applicant is willing. I do not need to.
5 If you have not continued the activities related to your status of residence
(limited to the status of residence (Note) in the upper column of Schedule 1
of the Immigration Control Act) for more than 3 months
(but do not perform such activities. There is a good reason for that,
except in the case. In addition, in revoking the status of residence,
it is decided to hear the opinion from targeted foreigners in advance.
Note: false fake documents are now changed to false documents.
The Immigration Control Act is revised every year,
so the content and expression have changed.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-13: Chers Messieurs, Les représentants de l'ambassade et les diplomates des Philippines ne font pas de "travail illégal". Ils ont été criminalisés pour leur soutien à l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration. Cette disposition est illégale. C'est donc une "fausse accusation". Vous devriez demander au gouvernement japonais une "restauration de l'honneur" et une compensation.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-13: Chers Messieurs, Les représentants de l'ambassade et les diplomates des Philippines ne font pas de "travail illégal".
Ils ont été criminalisés pour leur soutien à l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.
Cette disposition est illégale. C'est donc une "fausse accusation".
Vous devriez demander au gouvernement japonais une "restauration de l'honneur" et une compensation.


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 Comprendre la loi sur l'immigration, article 22-4- (4) "Annulation du statut de résidence".
Certains étrangers résidant au Japon ont reçu des autorisations d'atterrissage, etc. par des moyens faux ou frauduleux,
Certains étrangers résidant au Japon ont reçu des autorisations d'atterrissage, etc. par des moyens faux ou frauduleux,
Ou travail illégal sans exercer l'activité correspondant au statut de résidence,
Un certain nombre de facteurs empêchent un contrôle équitable de l'immigration, par exemple la commission d'un crime.
Afin de traiter correctement les activités de promotion du travail illégal, etc.
Dans certaines révisions de la loi de 2004 sur le contrôle de l'immigration,
Le système de «révocation du statut de résidence» (article 22-4) a été mis en place (appliqué le 2 décembre de la même année).


Lorsque le ministre de la Justice a constaté l'une des vérités suivantes:
Vous pouvez annuler le statut de résidence des étrangers.
1 Par des moyens faux ou frauduleux,
Cas de refus d'atterrissage: décision inappropriée de l'agent d'immigration concernant la légitimité et l'obtention d'un sceau d'autorisation de débarquement, etc.
2 imiter des activités qui vont être menées au Japon par imitation ou par un autre moyen d'injustice,
Dans le cas de l'obtention d'un sceau d'autorisation de débarquement. Par exemple
Ceux qui vont faire un travail simple au Japon
Si vous déclarez que vous exercez une activité correspondant au statut de résidence de "Technologie", etc., vous serez soumis à une annulation sous ce numéro.
3 Si le demandeur a contrefait un fait autre que l'activité qu'il compte exercer au Japon et a reçu une autorisation d'atterrissage, etc.
Par exemple, une affaire dans laquelle le candidat présente de manière erronée sa carrière peut être annulée en vertu de cette question.
4 Dans les cas autres que 1 à 3, où de faux documents sont soumis et que vous recevez un sceau d'autorisation de débarquement.
Dans ce numéro, rien n’exige que des moyens faux ou frauduleux soient utilisés.
Le demandeur a l'intention. Je n'ai pas besoin de.
5 Statut de résidence
Poursuivre les activités liées au statut de résidence (note) dans la colonne supérieure de l’annexe 1 de la Loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
Si vous n'êtes pas parti depuis plus de 3 mois
(Cependant, il existe une raison valable de rester au Japon sans mener de telles activités. Sauf dans le cas.)
En outre, lors de la révocation du statut de résident, il est décidé d'entendre l'avis des étrangers ciblés à l'avance.
Remarque: les faux faux documents sont désormais remplacés par de faux documents.
La loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration étant révisée chaque année, son contenu et son expression ont changé.

Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano



PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-13: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft leisten keine "illegale Arbeit". Sie wurden für ihre Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes unter Strafe gestellt. Diese Disposition ist illegal. Daher ist es "falsche Ladung". Sie sollten die japanische Regierung um "Wiederherstellung der Ehre" und Entschädigung bitten.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-13: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft leisten keine "illegale Arbeit".
Sie wurden für ihre Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes unter Strafe gestellt.
Diese Disposition ist illegal. Daher ist es "falsche Ladung".
Sie sollten die japanische Regierung um "Wiederherstellung der Ehre" und Entschädigung bitten.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. Verständnis des Einwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4- (4) "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus".
Einige in Japan wohnhafte Ausländer erhielten Landegenehmigungen usw. auf falsche oder andere betrügerische Weise.
Einige in Japan wohnhafte Ausländer erhielten Landegenehmigungen usw. auf falsche oder andere betrügerische Weise.
Oder illegale Arbeit ohne Ausübung der dem Aufenthaltsstatus entsprechenden Tätigkeit,
Es gibt eine Reihe von Dingen, die eine faire Einwanderungskontrolle verhindern, wie beispielsweise die Begehung eines Verbrechens.
Um mit illegalen Arbeitsförderungsaktivitäten etc. richtig umzugehen
In einigen Überarbeitungen des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes von 2004
Das System des Widerrufs des Aufenthaltsstatus (Artikel 22-4) wurde eingeführt (am 2. Dezember desselben Jahres durchgesetzt).


Wenn der Justizminister festgestellt hat, dass eine der folgenden Aussagen zutrifft:
Sie können den Aufenthaltsstatus von Ausländern kündigen.
1 Durch falsche oder andere betrügerische Mittel,
Landeverweigerungsereignisse: Falsche Entscheidung des Einwanderungsbeauftragten in Bezug auf Legitimität und Erhalt eines Siegels für die Landegenehmigung usw.
2 Identitätswechsel bei Aktivitäten, die in Japan durch Nachahmung oder auf andere Weise durchgeführt werden
Im Falle des Erhalts eines Siegels der Landeerlaubnis. Zum Beispiel
Diejenigen, die in Japan einfache Arbeit leisten werden
Wenn Sie erklären, dass Sie eine Aktivität ausführen, die dem Aufenthaltsstatus von "Technology" usw. entspricht, können Sie aufgrund dieses Problems storniert werden.
3 Wenn der Antragsteller einen anderen Sachverhalt als die von ihm beabsichtigte Tätigkeit in Japan gefälscht und ein Siegel für die Landeerlaubnis usw. erhalten hat.
Zum Beispiel kann ein Fall, in dem der Bewerber seine Karriere falsch darstellt, aufgrund dieses Problems storniert werden.
4 In anderen Fällen als 1 bis 3, in denen falsche Dokumente eingereicht werden und Sie ein Siegel der Landeerlaubnis erhalten.
In dieser Ausgabe gibt es keine Anforderung, dass falsche oder andere betrügerische Mittel.
Der Antragsteller hat die Absicht. Brauche ich nicht.
5 Aufenthaltsstatus
Fortsetzung der Aktivitäten zum Aufenthaltsstatus (Anmerkung) in der oberen Spalte von Anhang 1 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
Wenn Sie länger als 3 Monate nicht gegangen sind
(Es gibt jedoch einen berechtigten Grund, in Japan zu bleiben, ohne solche Aktivitäten durchzuführen. Ausgenommen in diesem Fall.)
Darüber hinaus wird beim Widerruf des Aufenthaltsstatus beschlossen, die Meinung der betroffenen Ausländer im Voraus einzuholen.
Hinweis: Falsche gefälschte Dokumente werden jetzt in falsche Dokumente geändert.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz wird jedes Jahr überarbeitet, sodass sich Inhalt und Ausdruck geändert haben.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu bestrafen.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, haben keinen kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-06-13:Dear Sirs, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not do "illegal labor". They were criminalized for their support of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act. This disposition is illegal. Therefore, it is "false charge". You should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor" and compensation.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-13:Dear Sirs, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not do "illegal labor".
They were criminalized for their support of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
This disposition is illegal. Therefore, it is "false charge".
You should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor" and compensation.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) "Cancellation of Status of Residence".
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Or, because there are not a few things that interfere with fair immigration control,
such as illegal work without committing the status of residence status or committing a crime,
there are a number of factors that prevent illegal work.
In order to
In a partial revision of the Immigration Control Act of 2004,
the "cancellation of status of residence" (Article 22-4) system was established
 (enforced on December 2 of the same year).

The Minister of Justice may cancel the status of residence held
by a foreigner if any of the following facts are found.
(1) In the case of receiving a seal of landing permission,
for example, by falsely determining the immigration examiner's decision
on landing refusal status by false or other fraudulent means.
2 False or other fraudulent means, if the activity to be conducted
in Japan is falsified and the landing permit is received.
For example, if a person who intends to do simple work
in Japan declares that he / she will carry out an activity
that falls under the status of residence of "Technology",
this item is subject to cancellation under this issue.
3 If the applicant forged a fact other than the activity
that the applicant intends to carry out
in Japan and received a seal of landing permission, etc.
For example,
a case in which the applicant misrepresents his / her career is subject to cancellation
under this issue.
4 In cases other than 1 to 3, where false documents are submitted
and you receive a seal of landing permission. In this issue, there is no requirement
for false or other fraudulent means, and the applicant is willing. I do not need to.
5 If you have not continued the activities related to your status of residence
(limited to the status of residence (Note) in the upper column of Schedule 1
of the Immigration Control Act) for more than 3 months
(but do not perform such activities. There is a good reason for that,
except in the case. In addition, in revoking the status of residence,
it is decided to hear the opinion from targeted foreigners in advance.
Note: false fake documents are now changed to false documents.
The Immigration Control Act is revised every year,
so the content and expression have changed.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-13:Dear Sirs, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not do "illegal labor". They were criminalized for their support of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act. This disposition is illegal. Therefore, it is "false charge". You should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor" and compensation.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-06-13:Dear Sirs, Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not do "illegal labor".
They were criminalized for their support of Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
This disposition is illegal. Therefore, it is "false charge".
You should ask the Japanese government for "restoration of honor" and compensation.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4) "Cancellation of Status of Residence".
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Some foreigners residing in Japan received landing permits etc.
by false or other fraudulent means,
Or, because there are not a few things that interfere with fair immigration control,
such as illegal work without committing the status of residence status or committing a crime,
there are a number of factors that prevent illegal work.
In order to
In a partial revision of the Immigration Control Act of 2004,
the "cancellation of status of residence" (Article 22-4) system was established
 (enforced on December 2 of the same year).

The Minister of Justice may cancel the status of residence held
by a foreigner if any of the following facts are found.
(1) In the case of receiving a seal of landing permission,
for example, by falsely determining the immigration examiner's decision
on landing refusal status by false or other fraudulent means.
2 False or other fraudulent means, if the activity to be conducted
in Japan is falsified and the landing permit is received.
For example, if a person who intends to do simple work
in Japan declares that he / she will carry out an activity
that falls under the status of residence of "Technology",
this item is subject to cancellation under this issue.
3 If the applicant forged a fact other than the activity
that the applicant intends to carry out
in Japan and received a seal of landing permission, etc.
For example,
a case in which the applicant misrepresents his / her career is subject to cancellation
under this issue.
4 In cases other than 1 to 3, where false documents are submitted
and you receive a seal of landing permission. In this issue, there is no requirement
for false or other fraudulent means, and the applicant is willing. I do not need to.
5 If you have not continued the activities related to your status of residence
(limited to the status of residence (Note) in the upper column of Schedule 1
of the Immigration Control Act) for more than 3 months
(but do not perform such activities. There is a good reason for that,
except in the case. In addition, in revoking the status of residence,
it is decided to hear the opinion from targeted foreigners in advance.
Note: false fake documents are now changed to false documents.
The Immigration Control Act is revised every year,
so the content and expression have changed.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims. If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines, the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims.
If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines,
the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of illegal labor related immigration laws.
(1) It is the "sin" of a foreigner who has illegal labor.
"Sins of unlawful labor" of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be sentenced to imprisonment
or imprisonment of 3 years or less or a fine of 3 million yen or less,
or both the imprisonment or contraindication and a fine together.

1) A person who has entered Japan in violation of the provisions of Article 3
2) Those who landed in Japan without receiving permission from the immigration inspector
3) Those who have been canceled from the status of residence under the provisions
of Article 22-4, paragraph 1 (limited to items pertaining to item 1 or item 2) in Japan
Person who received designation of period by rule of 2 of Article 2 4 of Article 22 4
 (including the cases where it applies mutatis mutandis
 in Article 2 of paragraph 2 of 2 of Article 61); What remains in
(Illegal work by non-qualifying activities)
4) Activities that "does" only activities that run businesses with income
or activities that receive "remuneration" in violation of the provisions
of Article 19, paragraph 1

(2) It is a punishment of a person who illegally hires a foreigner.
Immigration Act Article 73-2 "illegal employment promotion crime"
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be liable to imprisonment
of up to three years or a fine of up to 3 million yen, or both.

(1) A person who has made foreign workers illegally work in business activities
(Ii) A person who has put it under his control
in order to cause foreigners to carry out illegal work activities
A person who holds an act of causing foreigners to engage in illegal work activities
or an act of the preceding item
«Revision» Flat 16 Law 073
・ "Don't delete 1 item" Flat 21 method 079
Persons who have conducted an act that falls under each item
of the preceding paragraph can not escape punishment under the provisions
of the same paragraph because they do not know that they fall under any of the following items.
But it is not this limit when there is no fault.
(I) The activity of the said foreigner is an activity to operate a business
with income that does not belong to the activity according to the status
of residence of the foreigner, or an activity that receives a reward.
(Ii) The foreigner has not obtained the permission under Article 19 paragraph 2
in performing the activities of the foreigner.
Iii The relevant foreigner shall be from Article 70, paragraph 1,
item 1 to item 2, item 3, item 5, item 7 to item 7 or item 7 to item 7,
item 2 to item 8 to item 4. Being "a person to raise"

(3) In the "basic", we are moving foreigners to their home countries.
Because it has been examined and entered in accordance with the provisions
of the Immigration Control Act, if it violates, it is only "to leave the country."
However, it is against international law if arbitrary "forced eviction" is carried out,
so Japan's position will decline in the international community,
so we need to be careful.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims. If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines, the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims.
If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines,
the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of illegal labor related immigration laws.
(1) It is the "sin" of a foreigner who has illegal labor.
"Sins of unlawful labor" of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be sentenced to imprisonment
or imprisonment of 3 years or less or a fine of 3 million yen or less,
or both the imprisonment or contraindication and a fine together.

1) A person who has entered Japan in violation of the provisions of Article 3
2) Those who landed in Japan without receiving permission from the immigration inspector
3) Those who have been canceled from the status of residence under the provisions
of Article 22-4, paragraph 1 (limited to items pertaining to item 1 or item 2) in Japan
Person who received designation of period by rule of 2 of Article 2 4 of Article 22 4
 (including the cases where it applies mutatis mutandis
 in Article 2 of paragraph 2 of 2 of Article 61); What remains in
(Illegal work by non-qualifying activities)
4) Activities that "does" only activities that run businesses with income
or activities that receive "remuneration" in violation of the provisions
of Article 19, paragraph 1

(2) It is a punishment of a person who illegally hires a foreigner.
Immigration Act Article 73-2 "illegal employment promotion crime"
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be liable to imprisonment
of up to three years or a fine of up to 3 million yen, or both.

(1) A person who has made foreign workers illegally work in business activities
(Ii) A person who has put it under his control
in order to cause foreigners to carry out illegal work activities
A person who holds an act of causing foreigners to engage in illegal work activities
or an act of the preceding item
«Revision» Flat 16 Law 073
・ "Don't delete 1 item" Flat 21 method 079
Persons who have conducted an act that falls under each item
of the preceding paragraph can not escape punishment under the provisions
of the same paragraph because they do not know that they fall under any of the following items.
But it is not this limit when there is no fault.
(I) The activity of the said foreigner is an activity to operate a business
with income that does not belong to the activity according to the status
of residence of the foreigner, or an activity that receives a reward.
(Ii) The foreigner has not obtained the permission under Article 19 paragraph 2
in performing the activities of the foreigner.
Iii The relevant foreigner shall be from Article 70, paragraph 1,
item 1 to item 2, item 3, item 5, item 7 to item 7 or item 7 to item 7,
item 2 to item 8 to item 4. Being "a person to raise"

(3) In the "basic", we are moving foreigners to their home countries.
Because it has been examined and entered in accordance with the provisions
of the Immigration Control Act, if it violates, it is only "to leave the country."
However, it is against international law if arbitrary "forced eviction" is carried out,
so Japan's position will decline in the international community,
so we need to be careful.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-12: Chers Messieurs, "Les Philippines" ont de nombreuses victimes. Si le gouvernement philippin n'aide pas le peuple philippin, "Philippines" devrait également étudier la "loi japonaise sur le contrôle de l'immigration".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-12: Chers Messieurs, "Les Philippines" ont de nombreuses victimes.
Si le gouvernement philippin n'aide pas le peuple philippin,
"Philippines" devrait également étudier la "loi japonaise sur le contrôle de l'immigration".


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 Aperçu des lois sur l'immigration liée au travail illégal.
(1) C'est le "péché" d'un étranger qui a du travail illégal.
"Péchés de travail illégal" de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Personne qui correspond à l’un des prochains kakugo,
Emprisonnement de 3 ans ou moins ou emprisonnement ou amende pouvant aller jusqu'à 3 millions de yens,
Ou en même temps que la peine de prison ou la contre-indication et une amende.

1) Une personne qui est entrée au Japon en violation des dispositions de l'article 3
2) Ceux qui sont arrivés au Japon sans avoir obtenu l'autorisation de l'inspecteur de l'immigration
3) Par les dispositions de l'article 22-4, paragraphe 1 (limité à celles concernant le point 1 ou le point 2)
Ceux dont le statut de résidence a été révoqué restent au Japon
3 de 2) Conformément aux dispositions de l'article 22-4, paragraphe 7 (y compris le cas où il est appliqué mutatis mutandis à l'article 61-2, paragraphe 2)
Personne qui a reçu la désignation de période et qui reste au Japon après la période concernée
(Travail illégal d'activités non qualifiées)
4) Activités visant à exploiter des entreprises avec des revenus en violation des dispositions de l’article 19, paragraphe 1, ou
"Seulement" effectué l'activité pour recevoir "récompense"

(2) C'est une punition d'une personne qui embauche illégalement un étranger.
Article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration "crime de promotion de l'emploi illégal"
Une personne qui tombe sous l'un des éléments suivants est passible d'un emprisonnement maximal de trois ans ou d'une amende maximale de 3 millions de yens:
Ou les deux punitions.

(1) Une personne qui a forcé des travailleurs étrangers à travailler illégalement dans des activités commerciales
(Ii) Une personne qui l'a mise sous son propre contrôle afin d'amener les étrangers à exercer des activités de travail illégales
Une personne qui détient un acte ayant amené des étrangers à se livrer à des activités de travail illégales ou un acte du même élément
«Révision» Appartement 16 Loi 073
・ "Ne pas supprimer 1 élément" Méthode Flat 21 079
Personne qui a agi pour correspondre aux éléments des paragraphes précédents:
Pour la raison que je ne sais pas si cela correspond à l’un des éléments suivants,
Nous ne pouvons pas échapper à la peine sous le même paragraphe.
Mais ce n'est pas cette limite quand il n'y a pas de faute.
(I) Activités d’exploitation d’une entreprise dont le revenu est que l’activité de l’étranger n’appartient pas à l’activité selon le statut de résidence de l’étranger
Ou être une activité pour recevoir une récompense.
(Ii) L’étranger n’a pas obtenu l’autorisation prévue à l’article 19, paragraphe 2, dans l’exercice de ses activités.
(Iii) L’étranger concerné est compris entre les paragraphes 1 à 2 de l’article 70, paragraphe 1, 3
Être un "éloge" des 5ème, 7ème au 7ème ou 3ème du 8ème au 4ème du 8ème.

(3) Dans la "base", nous transférons les étrangers dans leur pays d'origine.
Parce qu'il a été examiné et enregistré conformément aux dispositions de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, s'il viole, il ne s'agit que de "quitter le pays".
Cependant, il est contraire au droit international si vous êtes obligé de "déporter" arbitrairement,
Il faut faire attention car la position du Japon va décliner dans la communauté internationale.

Je continuerai demain.


Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Article 70 du code pénal et "péchés au soutien d'autres crimes" du code pénal pour l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
"Appliquer" est "fou".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".
Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-12: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, "Die Philippinen" haben viele Opfer. Wenn die philippinische Regierung dem philippinischen Volk nicht hilft, "Philippinen" sollten auch "Japanisches Einwanderungskontrollgesetz" studieren.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-12: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, "Die Philippinen" haben viele Opfer.
Wenn die philippinische Regierung dem philippinischen Volk nicht hilft,
"Philippinen" sollten auch "Japanisches Einwanderungskontrollgesetz" studieren.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. Übersicht über illegale arbeitsrechtliche Einwanderungsgesetze.
(1) Es ist die "Sünde" eines Ausländers, der illegale Arbeit hat.
"Sünden der illegalen Arbeit" von Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Person, die einem der nächsten Kakugo entspricht,
Freiheitsstrafe bis zu 3 Jahren oder Freiheitsstrafe oder Geldstrafe bis zu 3 Millionen Yen,
Oder gleichzeitig mit der Gefängnisstrafe oder Gegenanzeige und einer Geldstrafe.

1) Eine Person, die unter Verstoß gegen Artikel 3 nach Japan eingereist ist
2) Diejenigen, die ohne Erlaubnis des Einwanderungsinspektors in Japan gelandet sind
3) Durch die Bestimmungen von Artikel 22-4 Absatz 1 (beschränkt auf die Bestimmungen von Punkt 1 oder Punkt 2)
Diejenigen, deren Aufenthaltsstatus widerrufen wurde, bleiben in Japan
3 von 2) Gemäß Artikel 22-4 Absatz 7 (einschließlich des Falls, in dem Artikel 61-2 Absatz 2 entsprechend angewendet wird)
Person, die die Bezeichnung des Zeitraums erhalten hat und nach dem betreffenden Zeitraum in Japan bleibt
(Illegale Arbeit durch nicht qualifizierende Aktivitäten)
4) Tätigkeiten zur Führung von Unternehmen mit Einkommen, die gegen die Bestimmungen von Artikel 19 Absatz 1 verstoßen, oder
"Nur" hat die Aktivität ausgeführt, um "Belohnung" zu erhalten

(2) Es ist eine Bestrafung einer Person, die illegal einen Ausländer anstellt.
Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2 "Illegale Arbeitsförderungskriminalität"
Eine Person, die unter einen der folgenden Punkte fällt, wird mit Freiheitsstrafe von bis zu drei Jahren oder einer Geldstrafe von bis zu 3 Millionen Yen bestraft:
Oder beide Strafen.

(1) Eine Person, die ausländische Arbeitnehmer zur illegalen Erwerbstätigkeit gezwungen hat
(II) Eine Person, die es unter ihre eigene Kontrolle gestellt hat, um Ausländer zu veranlassen, illegale Arbeitstätigkeiten auszuüben
Eine Person, die eine Handlung begangen hat, die Ausländer zur Ausübung illegaler Tätigkeiten veranlasst, oder eine Handlung des vorhergehenden Punktes
«Revision» Flat 16 Gesetz 073
・ "Löschen Sie nicht 1 Element" Flat 21-Methode 079
Person, die gehandelt hat, um 2 vorstehenden Absätzen zu entsprechen:
Aus dem Grund, dass ich nicht weiß, dass es einem der folgenden Punkte entspricht,
Wir können uns der Bestrafung nach demselben Absatz nicht entziehen.
Es ist jedoch nicht diese Grenze, wenn kein Fehler vorliegt.
(I) Tätigkeiten, um ein Geschäft mit einem Einkommen zu betreiben, das die Tätigkeit des Ausländers nicht zu der Tätigkeit gemäß dem Aufenthaltsstatus des Ausländers gehört
Oder eine Aktivität sein, um eine Belohnung zu erhalten.
(II) Der Ausländer hat die Erlaubnis nach Artikel 19 Absatz 2 für die Ausübung der Tätigkeiten des Ausländers nicht erhalten.
(Ii) Der betroffene Ausländer ist von Artikel 70 Absatz 1 Punkt 1 bis Punkt 2, 3
Ein "Lob" sein in 5., 7. bis 7. oder 3. von 8. bis 4. von 8..

(3) Im "Basic" ziehen wir Ausländer in ihre Heimatländer.
Da es gemäß den Bestimmungen des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes geprüft und eingetragen wurde, ist es bei Verstößen nur "das Land zu verlassen".
Es verstößt jedoch gegen das Völkerrecht, wenn Sie dazu gezwungen werden, willkürlich "abzuschieben"
Vorsicht ist geboten, da die Position Japans in der internationalen Gemeinschaft sinken wird.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.


Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu bestrafen.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 70 des Strafgesetzbuchs und "Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" des Strafgesetzbuchs für Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
"Bewerben" ist "verrückt".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, haben keinen kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".
Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims. If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines, the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims.
If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines,
the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of illegal labor related immigration laws.
(1) It is the "sin" of a foreigner who has illegal labor.
"Sins of unlawful labor" of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be sentenced to imprisonment
or imprisonment of 3 years or less or a fine of 3 million yen or less,
or both the imprisonment or contraindication and a fine together.

1) A person who has entered Japan in violation of the provisions of Article 3
2) Those who landed in Japan without receiving permission from the immigration inspector
3) Those who have been canceled from the status of residence under the provisions
of Article 22-4, paragraph 1 (limited to items pertaining to item 1 or item 2) in Japan
Person who received designation of period by rule of 2 of Article 2 4 of Article 22 4
 (including the cases where it applies mutatis mutandis
 in Article 2 of paragraph 2 of 2 of Article 61); What remains in
(Illegal work by non-qualifying activities)
4) Activities that "does" only activities that run businesses with income
or activities that receive "remuneration" in violation of the provisions
of Article 19, paragraph 1

(2) It is a punishment of a person who illegally hires a foreigner.
Immigration Act Article 73-2 "illegal employment promotion crime"
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be liable to imprisonment
of up to three years or a fine of up to 3 million yen, or both.

(1) A person who has made foreign workers illegally work in business activities
(Ii) A person who has put it under his control
in order to cause foreigners to carry out illegal work activities
A person who holds an act of causing foreigners to engage in illegal work activities
or an act of the preceding item
«Revision» Flat 16 Law 073
・ "Don't delete 1 item" Flat 21 method 079
Persons who have conducted an act that falls under each item
of the preceding paragraph can not escape punishment under the provisions
of the same paragraph because they do not know that they fall under any of the following items.
But it is not this limit when there is no fault.
(I) The activity of the said foreigner is an activity to operate a business
with income that does not belong to the activity according to the status
of residence of the foreigner, or an activity that receives a reward.
(Ii) The foreigner has not obtained the permission under Article 19 paragraph 2
in performing the activities of the foreigner.
Iii The relevant foreigner shall be from Article 70, paragraph 1,
item 1 to item 2, item 3, item 5, item 7 to item 7 or item 7 to item 7,
item 2 to item 8 to item 4. Being "a person to raise"

(3) In the "basic", we are moving foreigners to their home countries.
Because it has been examined and entered in accordance with the provisions
of the Immigration Control Act, if it violates, it is only "to leave the country."
However, it is against international law if arbitrary "forced eviction" is carried out,
so Japan's position will decline in the international community,
so we need to be careful.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims. If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines, the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims.
If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines,
the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of illegal labor related immigration laws.
(1) It is the "sin" of a foreigner who has illegal labor.
"Sins of unlawful labor" of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be sentenced to imprisonment
or imprisonment of 3 years or less or a fine of 3 million yen or less,
or both the imprisonment or contraindication and a fine together.

1) A person who has entered Japan in violation of the provisions of Article 3
2) Those who landed in Japan without receiving permission from the immigration inspector
3) Those who have been canceled from the status of residence under the provisions
of Article 22-4, paragraph 1 (limited to items pertaining to item 1 or item 2) in Japan
Person who received designation of period by rule of 2 of Article 2 4 of Article 22 4
 (including the cases where it applies mutatis mutandis
 in Article 2 of paragraph 2 of 2 of Article 61); What remains in
(Illegal work by non-qualifying activities)
4) Activities that "does" only activities that run businesses with income
or activities that receive "remuneration" in violation of the provisions
of Article 19, paragraph 1

(2) It is a punishment of a person who illegally hires a foreigner.
Immigration Act Article 73-2 "illegal employment promotion crime"
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be liable to imprisonment
of up to three years or a fine of up to 3 million yen, or both.

(1) A person who has made foreign workers illegally work in business activities
(Ii) A person who has put it under his control
in order to cause foreigners to carry out illegal work activities
A person who holds an act of causing foreigners to engage in illegal work activities
or an act of the preceding item
«Revision» Flat 16 Law 073
・ "Don't delete 1 item" Flat 21 method 079
Persons who have conducted an act that falls under each item
of the preceding paragraph can not escape punishment under the provisions
of the same paragraph because they do not know that they fall under any of the following items.
But it is not this limit when there is no fault.
(I) The activity of the said foreigner is an activity to operate a business
with income that does not belong to the activity according to the status
of residence of the foreigner, or an activity that receives a reward.
(Ii) The foreigner has not obtained the permission under Article 19 paragraph 2
in performing the activities of the foreigner.
Iii The relevant foreigner shall be from Article 70, paragraph 1,
item 1 to item 2, item 3, item 5, item 7 to item 7 or item 7 to item 7,
item 2 to item 8 to item 4. Being "a person to raise"

(3) In the "basic", we are moving foreigners to their home countries.
Because it has been examined and entered in accordance with the provisions
of the Immigration Control Act, if it violates, it is only "to leave the country."
However, it is against international law if arbitrary "forced eviction" is carried out,
so Japan's position will decline in the international community,
so we need to be careful.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************