To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister #MeToo Human rights victim! 2019-06-19:Dear Sir, I wrote yesterday. The Minister of Justice issued "status of residence". However, it is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister not to issue a visa. Prosecutors think "status of residence status" = "Visa". It's crazy. Today I will explain "Renewal and Change of Status of Residence".

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister　　#MeToo Human rights victim!


2019-06-19:Dear Sir, I wrote yesterday. The Minister of Justice issued "status of residence".
However, it is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister not to issue a visa.
Prosecutors think "status of residence status" = "Visa". It's crazy.
Today I will explain "Renewal and Change of Status of Residence".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. If a Chinese resident in Japan changes "status of residence"
from "Study Abroad" to "Technology", etc., or if "Period Renewal" is performed,
the Chinese person will apply directly.

For example, when you enter a job,
the company gives the Chinese person an employment contract,
reasons for employment, a registered copy of the company, a statement of accounts,
and a company guide.
These are described in the "instructions from the section manager",
which is distributed at the Immigration Bureau. (Not a law)

When it comes to from November to December.
The Chinese himself will go to the Immigration Office to submit a status change application form,
a resume, a reason for residence status change, a photo,
a reply postcard, a registered stamp, etc. and "documents received from the company".

In January, there may be a fact confirmation call to the company from Immigration.
As it is a factual investigation, it is the same as the case of invitation.

An example of a Chinese employee who joined L company.
He is the story of the company that took the exam before "L company".
Because the "seal" of the "Employment Contract" is not the "sign of the representative director",
the "immigration staff" conducted the "fact investigation".
The Immigration officials dismissed the application knowing
that the employment contract was a false lie.
The cause was that the "system manager" had created a "fake" employment contract.
It is a violation of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4).
It does not make it a "case".

After that, you will receive a postcard
(reply postcard) of the status of residence change (update).
Please come to Immigration with your diploma.
What to bring is passport ....

When I graduate, I will go to immigration with a diploma (in kind).
You will then be given a "Visa" on your passport in exchange for a postcard,
confirming your diploma.
In the case of renewal, if you go to the immigration office with only a postcard,
you will receive a "Visa" for your passport.

※ The exchange of "immigration control"
with the person is not known to the company unless the person reports.

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-19:Dear Sir, I wrote yesterday. The Minister of Justice issued "status of residence". However, it is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister not to issue a visa. Prosecutors think "status of residence status" = "Visa". It's crazy. Today I will explain "Renewal and Change of Status of Residence".

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-06-19:Dear Sir, I wrote yesterday. The Minister of Justice issued "status of residence".
However, it is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister not to issue a visa.
Prosecutors think "status of residence status" = "Visa". It's crazy.
Today I will explain "Renewal and Change of Status of Residence".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. If a Chinese resident in Japan changes "status of residence"
from "Study Abroad" to "Technology", etc., or if "Period Renewal" is performed,
the Chinese person will apply directly.

For example, when you enter a job,
the company gives the Chinese person an employment contract,
reasons for employment, a registered copy of the company, a statement of accounts,
and a company guide.
These are described in the "instructions from the section manager",
which is distributed at the Immigration Bureau. (Not a law)

When it comes to from November to December.
The Chinese himself will go to the Immigration Office to submit a status change application form,
a resume, a reason for residence status change, a photo,
a reply postcard, a registered stamp, etc. and "documents received from the company".

In January, there may be a fact confirmation call to the company from Immigration.
As it is a factual investigation, it is the same as the case of invitation.

An example of a Chinese employee who joined L company.
He is the story of the company that took the exam before "L company".
Because the "seal" of the "Employment Contract" is not the "sign of the representative director",
the "immigration staff" conducted the "fact investigation".
The Immigration officials dismissed the application knowing
that the employment contract was a false lie.
The cause was that the "system manager" had created a "fake" employment contract.
It is a violation of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4).
It does not make it a "case".

After that, you will receive a postcard
(reply postcard) of the status of residence change (update).
Please come to Immigration with your diploma.
What to bring is passport ....

When I graduate, I will go to immigration with a diploma (in kind).
You will then be given a "Visa" on your passport in exchange for a postcard,
confirming your diploma.
In the case of renewal, if you go to the immigration office with only a postcard,
you will receive a "Visa" for your passport.

※ The exchange of "immigration control"
with the person is not known to the company unless the person reports.

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-06-18:Dear Sirs, Immigration Bureau is the jurisdiction of Ministry of Justice. As a first step, apply to the Minister of Justice and receive a "Certificate of Residence Status". The type of residence status is defined in the Immigration Act. The grant of the status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. The qualifications of the applicant are stipulated in the "Ministerial Ordinance" (details of the Immigration Control Act).

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-06-18:Dear Sirs, Immigration Bureau is the jurisdiction of Ministry of Justice.
As a first step, apply to the Minister of Justice and receive a "Certificate
of Residence Status".
The type of residence status is defined in the Immigration Act.
The grant of the status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice.
The qualifications of the applicant are stipulated
in the "Ministerial Ordinance" (details of the Immigration Control Act).

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Usually,
an A5 sized “grant certificate of residence status” will be mailed to “Invitee (company)”
from “immigration” in three or four weeks.

In the case of non-authorization,
A4 size "reason book" will be mailed from "immigration".
Invitee (company) will mail "Certificate of delivery of status of residence"
and diploma (return) to "the person" by "EMS".

For example, a prospective Chinese candidate (in person)
in Fujian Province applies to a visa application agency company
 (a visa application agency designated by the Guangzhou consulate) managed
 by the Fujian Provincial Government.
We will submit “application form”, “passport”
and “certificate of delivery of status of residence” etc.

The “Visa Application Agent” will be contacted
by the Japanese consulate and will contact the Chinese person.
Instructs the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou to bring "set of application documents"
by specifying the day and time.

Usually, "common people" go to the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou in one day by bus or train.
And Chinese submit documents and "receive" a brief interview.
Usually, the consulate of Japan will put a "Visa" stamp on your passport
in exchange for a "Certificate of Residence Status".
This completes visa acquisition.

After that, you can enter Japan just by taking the usual “immigration control” at Narita.

Was it in 2009? This year, the consulate does not "stamp" the passport on the spot.
I will tell you later.
In the end, "this year" does not issue visas for Chineses applied by any company
I will call the consulate for no reason.
Tokyo Immigration is also "embarrassed" by saying "I don't know".
Maybe that's a political reason.

As an aside,
"Fujian Provincial Government's visa application agency" will collect information
from the Guangzhou consulate, using officials from Fujian Provincial Government
and Central Government.
Information will come from the Japanese consulate in January 2010.
The consulate in Guangzhou leaks information.
"I plan to issue a visa to the first 100 people, ...".
If you go to China, "Ministry of Foreign Affairs staff" will become "Chinese style".

What I would like you to understand here is that the residence status is given
by the Ministry of Justice (Immigration).
But "Visa" is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
(In other words, permission to live in Japan)
It is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister to not issue a visa,
although he has obtained a status of residence from the Minister of Justice.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



******　최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁　******


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다.
그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm

To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-06-18:Dear Sirs, Immigration Bureau is the jurisdiction of Ministry of Justice. As a first step, apply to the Minister of Justice and receive a "Certificate of Residence Status". The type of residence status is defined in the Immigration Act. The grant of the status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. The qualifications of the applicant are stipulated

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-18:Dear Sirs, Immigration Bureau is the jurisdiction of Ministry of Justice.
As a first step, apply to the Minister of Justice and receive a "Certificate
of Residence Status".
The type of residence status is defined in the Immigration Act.
The grant of the status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice.
The qualifications of the applicant are stipulated
in the "Ministerial Ordinance" (details of the Immigration Control Act).

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Usually,
an A5 sized “grant certificate of residence status” will be mailed to “Invitee (company)”
from “immigration” in three or four weeks.

In the case of non-authorization,
A4 size "reason book" will be mailed from "immigration".
Invitee (company) will mail "Certificate of delivery of status of residence"
and diploma (return) to "the person" by "EMS".

For example, a prospective Chinese candidate (in person)
in Fujian Province applies to a visa application agency company
 (a visa application agency designated by the Guangzhou consulate) managed
 by the Fujian Provincial Government.
We will submit “application form”, “passport”
and “certificate of delivery of status of residence” etc.

The “Visa Application Agent” will be contacted
by the Japanese consulate and will contact the Chinese person.
Instructs the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou to bring "set of application documents"
by specifying the day and time.

Usually, "common people" go to the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou in one day by bus or train.
And Chinese submit documents and "receive" a brief interview.
Usually, the consulate of Japan will put a "Visa" stamp on your passport
in exchange for a "Certificate of Residence Status".
This completes visa acquisition.

After that, you can enter Japan just by taking the usual “immigration control” at Narita.

Was it in 2009? This year, the consulate does not "stamp" the passport on the spot.
I will tell you later.
In the end, "this year" does not issue visas for Chineses applied by any company
I will call the consulate for no reason.
Tokyo Immigration is also "embarrassed" by saying "I don't know".
Maybe that's a political reason.

As an aside,
"Fujian Provincial Government's visa application agency" will collect information
from the Guangzhou consulate, using officials from Fujian Provincial Government
and Central Government.
Information will come from the Japanese consulate in January 2010.
The consulate in Guangzhou leaks information.
"I plan to issue a visa to the first 100 people, ...".
If you go to China, "Ministry of Foreign Affairs staff" will become "Chinese style".

What I would like you to understand here is that the residence status is given
by the Ministry of Justice (Immigration).
But "Visa" is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
(In other words, permission to live in Japan)
It is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister to not issue a visa,
although he has obtained a status of residence from the Minister of Justice.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-18: Chers Messieurs, Le Bureau de l'immigration est du ressort du ministère de la Justice. Dans un premier temps, adressez-vous au ministre de la Justice et recevez un "certificat de résidence". Le type de statut de résidence est défini dans la loi sur l'immigration. L'attribution du statut de résidence est laissée à la discrétion du ministre de la justice. Les qualifications du demandeur sont précisées dans l'ordonnance ministérielle (détails de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration).

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-18: Chers Messieurs, Le Bureau de l'immigration est du ressort du ministère de la Justice.
Dans un premier temps, adressez-vous au ministre de la Justice et recevez un "certificat de résidence".
Le type de statut de résidence est défini dans la loi sur l'immigration.
L'attribution du statut de résidence est laissée à la discrétion du ministre de la justice.
Les qualifications du demandeur sont précisées dans l'ordonnance ministérielle (détails de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration).


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 Habituellement 3 ou 4 semaines pour la taille A5
"Certificat de résidence" sera envoyé à "Invité" de "Immigration"

En cas de non-autorisation, un "cahier de motifs" au format A4 sera envoyé de "immigration".
Invité (société) dit "certificat de délivrance du statut de résidence"
Le certificat de diplôme (retour) sera envoyé à "la personne" par "EMS".

Par exemple, les "invités prévus" chinois du Fujian (en personne) sont gérés par le "gouvernement provincial du Fujian".
Appliquer à "l'agent de demande de visa" (agent de demande de visa spécifié par le consulat de Guangzhou).
Nous soumettrons «formulaire de demande», «passeport» et «certificat de délivrance du statut de résidence», etc.

Le «consulat du Japon» contactera l'agent chargé des demandes de visa et contactera la personne chinoise.
Charge le consulat du Japon à Guangzhou d'apporter "un ensemble de documents de demande" en précisant le jour et l'heure.

Habituellement, les «gens ordinaires» se rendent au consulat du Japon à Guangzhou en une journée en bus ou en train.
Et les Chinois soumettent des documents et "reçoivent" une brève interview.
En règle générale, le consulat du Japon échange le "certificat de résidence" sur place.
Vous allez apposer le visa sur votre passeport.
Ceci achève l'acquisition du visa.

Après cela, vous pouvez entrer au Japon en prenant simplement le «contrôle de l'immigration» habituel à Narita.

Était-ce en 2009? Cette année, le consulat ne "tamponne" pas le passeport sur place.
Je te le dirai plus tard.
En fin de compte, "cette année" n'émet pas de visas pour les Chinois appliqués par une entreprise
Je vais appeler le consulat sans raison.
L'immigration de Tokyo est également "embarrassée" en disant "je ne sais pas".
Peut-être que c'est une raison politique.

Par ailleurs, "l'agence chargée de la gestion des demandes de visa du gouvernement provincial du Fujian" a recours aux services du gouvernement provincial du Fujian et du gouvernement central
Recueillez des informations auprès du consulat de Guangzhou.
L'information viendra du consulat du Japon en janvier 2010.
Le consulat à Guangzhou divulgue des informations.
"Je prévois de délivrer un visa aux 100 premières personnes, ...".
Si vous allez en Chine, les "employés du ministère des Affaires étrangères" deviendront "à la chinoise".

Ce que je voudrais que vous compreniez ici est que le statut de résidence est attribué par le ministère de la Justice (Immigration).
Mais "Visa" est le ministère des Affaires étrangères.
(Autrement dit, autorisation de vivre au Japon)
Il n'est pas rare que le ministre des Affaires étrangères ne délivre pas de visa, bien qu'il ait obtenu le statut de résident du ministre de la Justice.

Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, en revanche, s’applique aux employeurs qui ont un "lien de causalité" avec le travail illégal, article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-18: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die Einwanderungsbehörde ist zuständig für das Justizministerium. Stellen Sie in einem ersten Schritt einen Antrag an den Justizminister und erhalten Sie eine "Aufenthaltsbescheinigung". Die Art des Aufenthaltsstatus ist im Zuwanderungsgesetz festgelegt. Die Gewährung des Aufenthaltsstatus liegt im Ermessen des Justizministers. Die Qualifikationen des Antragstellers sind in der "Ministerialverordnung" (Details des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes) festgelegt.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-18: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die Einwanderungsbehörde ist zuständig für das Justizministerium.
Stellen Sie in einem ersten Schritt einen Antrag an den Justizminister und erhalten Sie eine "Aufenthaltsbescheinigung".
Die Art des Aufenthaltsstatus ist im Zuwanderungsgesetz festgelegt.
Die Gewährung des Aufenthaltsstatus liegt im Ermessen des Justizministers.
Die Qualifikationen des Antragstellers sind in der "Ministerialverordnung" (Details des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes) festgelegt.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. Normalerweise 3 oder 4 wochen für A5 größe
"Certificate of Residence Status" wird an "Invitee" von "Immigration" gesendet

Im Falle einer Nichtautorisierung wird das "Grundbuch" im A4-Format von "Einwanderung" versandt.
Einladende (Firma) sagt "Bescheinigung über die Übergabe des Aufenthaltsstatus"
Die Urkunde (Rücksendung) wird von "EMS" an "die Person" geschickt.

Zum Beispiel werden die chinesischen "geplanten Eingeladenen" von Fujian (persönlich) von der "Provinzregierung von Fujian" verwaltet.
Wenden Sie sich an den "Visa Application Agent" (vom Konsulat in Guangzhou festgelegter Visa Application Agent).
Wir werden "Antragsformular", "Reisepass" und "Bescheinigung über die Übergabe des Aufenthaltsstatus" usw. einreichen.

Die "Visa-Beantragungsstelle" wird vom japanischen Konsulat kontaktiert und kontaktiert die chinesische Person.
Fordert das japanische Konsulat in Guangzhou auf, "Antragsdokumente" mit Angabe von Tag und Uhrzeit vorzulegen.

Normalerweise gehen "normale Leute" an einem Tag mit Bus oder Zug zum japanischen Konsulat in Guangzhou.
Und Chinesen reichen Dokumente ein und "erhalten" ein kurzes Interview.
In der Regel tauscht das japanische Konsulat vor Ort das "Certificate of Residence Status" aus.
Sie werden das "Visum" (Stempel) auf Ihrem Reisepass abgestempelt.
Damit ist die Visaerfassung abgeschlossen.

Danach können Sie nach Japan einreisen, indem Sie die übliche „Einwanderungskontrolle“ in Narita absolvieren.

War es im jahr 2009 In diesem Jahr "stempelt" das Konsulat den Pass nicht vor Ort.
Ich werde es dir später erzählen.
Letztendlich stellt "dieses Jahr" keine Visa für Chinesen aus, die von einem Unternehmen beantragt wurden
Ich werde das Konsulat ohne Grund anrufen.
Tokyo Immigration ist auch "verlegen" und sagt "Ich weiß nicht".
Vielleicht ist das ein politischer Grund.

Nebenbei bemerkt, "Fujian Provincial Government Visa Application Agency Company" nutzt Fujian Provincial Government und Beamte der Zentralregierung,
Informationen vom Konsulat in Guangzhou einholen.
Informationen werden vom japanischen Konsulat im Januar 2010 kommen.
Das Konsulat in Guangzhou gibt Informationen preis.
"Ich habe vor, den ersten 100 Personen ein Visum zu erteilen, ...".
Wenn Sie nach China gehen, wird das "Personal des Außenministeriums" zum "chinesischen Stil".

Was ich hier verstehen möchte, ist, dass der Aufenthaltsstatus vom Justizministerium (Einwanderung) vergeben wird.
Aber "Visa" ist das Außenministerium.
(Mit anderen Worten, die Erlaubnis, in Japan zu leben)
Es ist nicht ungewöhnlich, dass der Außenminister kein Visum ausstellt, obwohl er vom Justizminister einen Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten hat.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, die einen "Kausalzusammenhang" mit illegaler Arbeit haben, Artikel 73-2.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-06-18:Dear Sirs, Immigration Bureau is the jurisdiction of Ministry of Justice. As a first step, apply to the Minister of Justice and receive a "Certificate of Residence Status". The type of residence status is defined in the Immigration Act. The grant of the status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. The qualifications of the applicant are stipulated in the "Ministerial Ordinance" (details of the Immigration Control Act).

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-18:Dear Sirs, Immigration Bureau is the jurisdiction of Ministry of Justice.
As a first step, apply to the Minister of Justice and receive a "Certificate
of Residence Status".
The type of residence status is defined in the Immigration Act.
The grant of the status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice.
The qualifications of the applicant are stipulated
in the "Ministerial Ordinance" (details of the Immigration Control Act).

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Usually,
an A5 sized “grant certificate of residence status” will be mailed to “Invitee (company)”
from “immigration” in three or four weeks.

In the case of non-authorization,
A4 size "reason book" will be mailed from "immigration".
Invitee (company) will mail "Certificate of delivery of status of residence"
and diploma (return) to "the person" by "EMS".

For example, a prospective Chinese candidate (in person)
in Fujian Province applies to a visa application agency company
 (a visa application agency designated by the Guangzhou consulate) managed
 by the Fujian Provincial Government.
We will submit “application form”, “passport”
and “certificate of delivery of status of residence” etc.

The “Visa Application Agent” will be contacted
by the Japanese consulate and will contact the Chinese person.
Instructs the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou to bring "set of application documents"
by specifying the day and time.

Usually, "common people" go to the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou in one day by bus or train.
And Chinese submit documents and "receive" a brief interview.
Usually, the consulate of Japan will put a "Visa" stamp on your passport
in exchange for a "Certificate of Residence Status".
This completes visa acquisition.

After that, you can enter Japan just by taking the usual “immigration control” at Narita.

Was it in 2009? This year, the consulate does not "stamp" the passport on the spot.
I will tell you later.
In the end, "this year" does not issue visas for Chineses applied by any company
I will call the consulate for no reason.
Tokyo Immigration is also "embarrassed" by saying "I don't know".
Maybe that's a political reason.

As an aside,
"Fujian Provincial Government's visa application agency" will collect information
from the Guangzhou consulate, using officials from Fujian Provincial Government
and Central Government.
Information will come from the Japanese consulate in January 2010.
The consulate in Guangzhou leaks information.
"I plan to issue a visa to the first 100 people, ...".
If you go to China, "Ministry of Foreign Affairs staff" will become "Chinese style".

What I would like you to understand here is that the residence status is given
by the Ministry of Justice (Immigration).
But "Visa" is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
(In other words, permission to live in Japan)
It is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister to not issue a visa,
although he has obtained a status of residence from the Minister of Justice.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-18:Dear Sirs, Immigration Bureau is the jurisdiction of Ministry of Justice. As a first step, apply to the Minister of Justice and receive a "Certificate of Residence Status". The type of residence status is defined in the Immigration Act. The grant of the status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. The qualifications of the applicant are stipulated in the "Ministerial Ordinance" (details of the Immigration Control Act).

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-06-18:Dear Sirs, Immigration Bureau is the jurisdiction of Ministry of Justice.
As a first step, apply to the Minister of Justice and receive a "Certificate
of Residence Status".
The type of residence status is defined in the Immigration Act.
The grant of the status of residence is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice.
The qualifications of the applicant are stipulated
in the "Ministerial Ordinance" (details of the Immigration Control Act).

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Usually,
an A5 sized “grant certificate of residence status” will be mailed to “Invitee (company)”
from “immigration” in three or four weeks.

In the case of non-authorization,
A4 size "reason book" will be mailed from "immigration".
Invitee (company) will mail "Certificate of delivery of status of residence"
and diploma (return) to "the person" by "EMS".

For example, a prospective Chinese candidate (in person)
in Fujian Province applies to a visa application agency company
 (a visa application agency designated by the Guangzhou consulate) managed
 by the Fujian Provincial Government.
We will submit “application form”, “passport”
and “certificate of delivery of status of residence” etc.

The “Visa Application Agent” will be contacted
by the Japanese consulate and will contact the Chinese person.
Instructs the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou to bring "set of application documents"
by specifying the day and time.

Usually, "common people" go to the Japanese consulate in Guangzhou in one day by bus or train.
And Chinese submit documents and "receive" a brief interview.
Usually, the consulate of Japan will put a "Visa" stamp on your passport
in exchange for a "Certificate of Residence Status".
This completes visa acquisition.

After that, you can enter Japan just by taking the usual “immigration control” at Narita.

Was it in 2009? This year, the consulate does not "stamp" the passport on the spot.
I will tell you later.
In the end, "this year" does not issue visas for Chineses applied by any company
I will call the consulate for no reason.
Tokyo Immigration is also "embarrassed" by saying "I don't know".
Maybe that's a political reason.

As an aside,
"Fujian Provincial Government's visa application agency" will collect information
from the Guangzhou consulate, using officials from Fujian Provincial Government
and Central Government.
Information will come from the Japanese consulate in January 2010.
The consulate in Guangzhou leaks information.
"I plan to issue a visa to the first 100 people, ...".
If you go to China, "Ministry of Foreign Affairs staff" will become "Chinese style".

What I would like you to understand here is that the residence status is given
by the Ministry of Justice (Immigration).
But "Visa" is the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
(In other words, permission to live in Japan)
It is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister to not issue a visa,
although he has obtained a status of residence from the Minister of Justice.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes"
of Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" 일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다. 이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다. 그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다. 그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다. 지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다. 북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다. 정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오. http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-06-17:Dear Sirs,In this "case", police officers,
prosecutors and judges do not know the relationship between "status of residence" and "Visa".
Please understand what procedure the Japanese government "issuing" "Visa".
"Status of residence" and "visa" are different.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1. It is the actual practice affairs of obtaining status of residence (Visa) of working.
Foreigners are regulated by the Ministry of Justice in accordance
with the type of status of residence.
It has "standard" of "grant" such as "degree" necessary for qualification "is set".
Foreigners enter Japan after receiving a "Visa" according to the following procedure.

As an example, the case of "inviting" the "Chinese" of "resident in China"
with the status of residence such as "technology" is described.
Chinese send "status of residence" application form, resume, transcripts,
diploma (original), certificate photo etc to "inviting company".
The company that invites them submits it to the Immigration Control
with the employment contract, employment reason statement, company's registered copy,
financial statement, company information, etc.

After one or two weeks,
the immigration office will ask you to submit "Additional Materials" such as "Question calls"
and "cost accounting" details, "Person's plans" and "Customers' orders".
This is the "fact investigation".

In the case of "invite", we did not come to the company and investigate. But,
If you apply for a change of status of residence from "spouse visa" to "permanent visa",
there is a "fact investigation" because "spoofed marriage" is suspected.
The Immigration Official enters the apartment room.
And toothbrushes, pajamas, ...
and the end seems to check up to the "presence" of "semen"
of the sheet to check the "presence" of sex.
(The immigration inspector has been given "right to investigate facts",
so no court permission is required.)

Most Chinese club hostess are international students or "spoofed marriages".
They are relieved about "regular customer",
so anything honestly talks about the "actual situation".

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.


Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


******　최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁　******


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다.
그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


북한 정부는 일본 정부에 '항의'해야합니다.
"일본 정부야말로 외국인 납치 '사건을'해결 '해야한다.
"Same ethnic"이다 "남조선 인" "의"피해자 "는"수천 "있습니다.
"한반도의 인민 '을'대표 '하고 일본 정부에 항의를하십시오!
아베 정권의 약점은 「입관 법 위반 사건 "입니다.
일본이 법에 따라 통치하지 않는 증거의 '사건'입니다.

일본 정부의 '입관 법 위반 "허위을 공표합니다.
7 월 참의원 선거를 향한 이러한 것을 공표하고 일본 정부를 규탄하십시오.
아베 정권은 당황합니다.
아베 정권이 무너지면 다음 정권은 북한에 순종 생각합니다.

북한은 일본 정부가 외국인을 "불법"납치, 감금 "하고있다"고 공표해야한다.
북한은 "일본인 납치 자"보다 많은 "외국인 피해자"가 있는지 "공표"해야합니다.
북한은 세계 언론을 북한의 '아군'으로해야합니다.
북한 정부는 외국 언론이나 유엔에서 발표합니다.
북한 정부는 구체적으로 "내 이름"을 공표합니다. 승인합니다.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site: (Japanese and English) http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-17:Dear Sirs,In this "case", police officers,
prosecutors and judges do not know the relationship between "status of residence" and "Visa".
Please understand what procedure the Japanese government "issuing" "Visa".
"Status of residence" and "visa" are different.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1. It is the actual practice affairs of obtaining status of residence (Visa) of working.
Foreigners are regulated by the Ministry of Justice in accordance
with the type of status of residence.
It has "standard" of "grant" such as "degree" necessary for qualification "is set".
Foreigners enter Japan after receiving a "Visa" according to the following procedure.

As an example, the case of "inviting" the "Chinese" of "resident in China"
with the status of residence such as "technology" is described.
Chinese send "status of residence" application form, resume, transcripts,
diploma (original), certificate photo etc to "inviting company".
The company that invites them submits it to the Immigration Control
with the employment contract, employment reason statement, company's registered copy,
financial statement, company information, etc.

After one or two weeks,
the immigration office will ask you to submit "Additional Materials" such as "Question calls"
and "cost accounting" details, "Person's plans" and "Customers' orders".
This is the "fact investigation".

In the case of "invite", we did not come to the company and investigate. But,
If you apply for a change of status of residence from "spouse visa" to "permanent visa",
there is a "fact investigation" because "spoofed marriage" is suspected.
The Immigration Official enters the apartment room.
And toothbrushes, pajamas, ...
and the end seems to check up to the "presence" of "semen"
of the sheet to check the "presence" of sex.
(The immigration inspector has been given "right to investigate facts",
so no court permission is required.)

Most Chinese club hostess are international students or "spoofed marriages".
They are relieved about "regular customer",
so anything honestly talks about the "actual situation".

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.


Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-17:Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents". Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration. "Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippin

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-17: Chers Messieurs, Dans cette "affaire", officier de police, procureur,
Les juges ne connaissent pas la relation entre "statut de résidence" et "visa".
S'il vous plaît comprendre quelle procédure le gouvernement japonais "émet" "" Visa ".
"Statut de résidence" et "visa" sont différents.


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 Il s’agit de la pratique consistant à obtenir le statut de résidence (Visa) de travail.
Les étrangers sont réglementés par le Ministère de la justice en fonction du type de statut de résidence.
Il a "standard" de "subvention" tel que "degré" nécessaire pour la qualification "est défini".
Les étrangers entrent au Japon après avoir reçu un "visa" selon la procédure suivante.

À titre d'exemple
Décrivez le cas d '"inviter" les "Chinois" de "résidents en Chine" dans des statuts de résidence tels que "technologie".
Les Chinois sont tenus de demander le "statut de résidence", un curriculum vitae, une transcription, un diplôme (original),
Nous envoyons une photo d'identification, etc. à "l'entreprise invitante".
(La société) qui les a provoqués, contrat de travail, cahier de motifs d’emploi, copie enregistrée de la société, état financier,
Nous soumettons l'immigration de l'entreprise avec les informations de l'entreprise.

Après une ou deux semaines, les détails de "l’appel à questions" et de la "comptabilité analytique" de Immigration
Il vous sera demandé de soumettre des "matériaux supplémentaires" tels que "le manuel du planificateur" et "la commande du client".
C'est la "recherche sur les faits".

Dans le cas d '"inviter", nous ne sommes pas venus dans l'entreprise et avons enquêté. Mais
Lors d'une demande de changement de statut de résidence de "visa de conjoint" à "visa permanent"
Il y a une "enquête factuelle" car un "mariage frauduleux" est suspecté.
L'agent d'immigration entre dans la chambre de l'appartement.
Et des brosses à dents, des pyjamas, ...
Et dans la période finale, il semble vérifier jusqu'à la "présence" du "sperme" de la feuille pour confirmer la "présence" du sexe.
(L'inspecteur de l'immigration a reçu "le droit d'enquêter sur les faits", aucune autorisation judiciaire n'est donc requise.)

La plupart des hôtesses de club chinois sont des étudiants internationaux ou "mariages spoofés".
Ils sont soulagés du "client régulier", donc tout ce qui parle honnêtement de la "situation réelle".

Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, en revanche, s’applique aux employeurs qui ont un "lien de causalité" avec le travail illégal, article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-17:Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig. Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft. Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, die einen "Kausalzusammenhang" mit illegaler Arbeit haben, Artikel 73-2. Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-17: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, in diesem "Fall" Polizist, Staatsanwalt,
Die Richter kennen den Zusammenhang zwischen "Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Visum" nicht.
Bitte haben Sie Verständnis dafür, wie die japanische Regierung ein "Visum" ausstellt.
"Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Visum" sind unterschiedlich.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. Es ist die tatsächliche Praxis Angelegenheiten der Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus (Visa) der Arbeit.
Ausländer werden vom Justizministerium entsprechend der Art des Aufenthaltsstatus reguliert.
Es hat "Standard" von "Zuschuss" wie "Abschluss" notwendig für die Qualifikation "gesetzt".
Ausländer reisen nach Japan ein, nachdem sie ein "Visum" gemäß dem folgenden Verfahren erhalten haben.

Zum Beispiel
Beschreiben Sie den Fall, dass die "Chinesen" von "Resident in China" im Aufenthaltsstatus "Technologie" "eingeladen" werden.
Chinesen müssen einen Antrag auf „Aufenthaltsstatus“, einen Lebenslauf, eine Niederschrift, ein Diplom (Original),
Ich schicke ein Identifikationsfoto usw. zu "einladender Firma".
(Das Unternehmen), das sie verursacht, Arbeitsvertrag, Arbeitsgrundbuch, Firmenkopie, Jahresabschluss,
Wir übermitteln die Unternehmenszuwanderung mit Unternehmensinformationen.

Nach ein oder zwei Wochen werden die Details zu "Call for questions" und "cost accounting" von Immigration,
Sie werden aufgefordert, "Zusätzliche Materialien" wie "Planerhandbuch" und "Bestellung vom Kunden" einzureichen.
Dies ist die "Tatsachenermittlung".

Im Falle von "einladen" sind wir nicht zur Firma gekommen und haben nachgeforscht. Aber
Bei der Beantragung einer Änderung des Aufenthaltsstatus von "Ehegattenvisum" zu "ständigem Visum"
Es gibt eine "Tatsachenermittlung", weil "gefälschte Ehe" vermutet wird.
Der Einwanderungsbeamte betritt das Apartmentzimmer.
Und Zahnbürsten, Schlafanzüge, ...
Und in der letzten Periode scheint es, bis zum "Vorhandensein" von "Samen" auf dem Blatt zu prüfen, um das "Vorhandensein" von Sex zu bestätigen.
(Dem Einwanderungsinspektor wurde "das Recht eingeräumt, Tatsachen zu untersuchen", daher ist keine gerichtliche Genehmigung erforderlich.)

Die meisten chinesischen Clubhostessen sind internationale Studenten oder "gefälschte Ehen".
Sie sind über "Stammkunden" erleichtert, daher spricht alles ehrlich über die "tatsächliche Situation".

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, die einen "Kausalzusammenhang" mit illegaler Arbeit haben, Artikel 73-2.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-06-17:It is the actual practice affairs of obtaining status of residence (Visa) of working. Foreigners are regulated by the Ministry of Justice in accordance with the type of status of residence. It has "standard" of "grant" such as "degree" necessary for qualification "is set". Foreigners enter Japan after receiving a "Visa" according to the following procedure.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-17:Dear Sirs,In this "case", police officers,
prosecutors and judges do not know the relationship between "status of residence" and "Visa".
Please understand what procedure the Japanese government "issuing" "Visa".
"Status of residence" and "visa" are different.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1. It is the actual practice affairs of obtaining status of residence (Visa) of working.
Foreigners are regulated by the Ministry of Justice in accordance
with the type of status of residence.
It has "standard" of "grant" such as "degree" necessary for qualification "is set".
Foreigners enter Japan after receiving a "Visa" according to the following procedure.

As an example, the case of "inviting" the "Chinese" of "resident in China"
with the status of residence such as "technology" is described.
Chinese send "status of residence" application form, resume, transcripts,
diploma (original), certificate photo etc to "inviting company".
The company that invites them submits it to the Immigration Control
with the employment contract, employment reason statement, company's registered copy,
financial statement, company information, etc.

After one or two weeks,
the immigration office will ask you to submit "Additional Materials" such as "Question calls"
and "cost accounting" details, "Person's plans" and "Customers' orders".
This is the "fact investigation".

In the case of "invite", we did not come to the company and investigate. But,
If you apply for a change of status of residence from "spouse visa" to "permanent visa",
there is a "fact investigation" because "spoofed marriage" is suspected.
The Immigration Official enters the apartment room.
And toothbrushes, pajamas, ...
and the end seems to check up to the "presence" of "semen"
of the sheet to check the "presence" of sex.
(The immigration inspector has been given "right to investigate facts",
so no court permission is required.)

Most Chinese club hostess are international students or "spoofed marriages".
They are relieved about "regular customer",
so anything honestly talks about the "actual situation".

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.


Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-17:Dear Sirs,In this "case", police officers, prosecutors and judges do not know the relationship between "status of residence" and "Visa". Please understand what procedure the Japanese government "issuing" "Visa". "Status of residence" and "visa" are different.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-06-17:Dear Sirs,In this "case", police officers,
prosecutors and judges do not know the relationship between "status of residence" and "Visa".
Please understand what procedure the Japanese government "issuing" "Visa".
"Status of residence" and "visa" are different.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1. It is the actual practice affairs of obtaining status of residence (Visa) of working.
Foreigners are regulated by the Ministry of Justice in accordance
with the type of status of residence.
It has "standard" of "grant" such as "degree" necessary for qualification "is set".
Foreigners enter Japan after receiving a "Visa" according to the following procedure.

As an example, the case of "inviting" the "Chinese" of "resident in China"
with the status of residence such as "technology" is described.
Chinese send "status of residence" application form, resume, transcripts,
diploma (original), certificate photo etc to "inviting company".
The company that invites them submits it to the Immigration Control
with the employment contract, employment reason statement, company's registered copy,
financial statement, company information, etc.

After one or two weeks,
the immigration office will ask you to submit "Additional Materials" such as "Question calls"
and "cost accounting" details, "Person's plans" and "Customers' orders".
This is the "fact investigation".

In the case of "invite", we did not come to the company and investigate. But,
If you apply for a change of status of residence from "spouse visa" to "permanent visa",
there is a "fact investigation" because "spoofed marriage" is suspected.
The Immigration Official enters the apartment room.
And toothbrushes, pajamas, ...
and the end seems to check up to the "presence" of "semen"
of the sheet to check the "presence" of sex.
(The immigration inspector has been given "right to investigate facts",
so no court permission is required.)

Most Chinese club hostess are international students or "spoofed marriages".
They are relieved about "regular customer",
so anything honestly talks about the "actual situation".

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.


Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************