6/21/2019

To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-21:Dear Sirs, Immigration Act is changed every year.
And much of the "immigration policy" is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice,
not the law. Much of the "immigration administration" should not be a "criminal case."
If it is forced to "criminal case", it becomes "illegal punishment" like "this case".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. The "immigration administration" is influenced by politicians.
The Democratic Party's former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba
 (she is a lawyer) has "abolished" the "working conditions"
 for Chinese foreign students in the "change" of "ministerial ordinance".
Foreign students from China have admitted that "any job" can be "in unlimited time".
As a hostess, it means "Night entertainment (nightlife) business".
"The Immigration Bureau staff" can always do "home investigation"
with "rights of fact investigation".
In addition, Keiko Chiba has made it impossible for "immigration officials"
and "police officers" to "coinvestigate".

The above was returned to the "Abe government".

The police will go through the procedure of the house investigation.
Usually, only illegal workers are arrested and employers are not.
This is the mysterious legal system of "the ruled state".
According to the law, if the employer is arrested,
the impact on employers is immense because illegal employment promotion crimes are
both company and individual penalties.

In society, this is called adhesion.
The judicial person will call this "discretion".

I think this problem is serious.
As the number of elderly people increases and the labor force decreases, wages rise.
However, wages do not go up.
Regular employment of young people is decreasing rapidly.
The reason behind this is that foreign workers can make short-term employment with cheap wages.
It is because Japanese are made to compete in this.
So even if you say Abenomics, there are 42% of households
with household income of 3 million yen or less.
Non-regular employees are only increasing.

It will continue next week.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************




Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-21: Chers Messieurs, La loi sur l'immigration change chaque année. Et une grande partie de la "politique d'immigration" est laissée à la discrétion du ministre de la Justice, pas à la loi. Une grande partie de "l'administration de l'immigration" ne devrait pas être une "affaire pénale". S'il est forcé de "faire une affaire criminelle", cela devient une "peine illégale" comme "cette affaire".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-21: Chers Messieurs, La loi sur l'immigration change chaque année.
Et une grande partie de la "politique d'immigration" est laissée à la discrétion du ministre de la Justice, pas à la loi.
Une grande partie de "l'administration de l'immigration" ne devrait pas être une "affaire pénale".
S'il est forcé de "faire une affaire criminelle", cela devient une "peine illégale" comme "cette affaire".


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 L'administration de l'immigration est influencée par les politiciens.
Démocrate "Keiko Chiba", ancienne ministre de la Justice (elle est avocate),
Dans "changement" d'ordonnance ministérielle,
Nous avons "aboli" les "conditions de travail" des étudiants étrangers chinois.
Les étudiants étrangers en provenance de Chine ont admis que "n'importe quel travail" peut être "dans un temps illimité".
En tant qu'hôtesse, cela signifie "affaires de divertissement de nuit (vie nocturne)".
"Le personnel du bureau de l'immigration" peut toujours effectuer une "enquête à domicile" avec "une enquête sur les droits factuels".
En outre, Keiko Chiba a empêché les "agents de l'immigration" et les "agents de police" de "mener des enquêtes".

Ce qui précède a été renvoyé au "gouvernement Abe".

La police passera par la procédure d'enquête de la maison.
Habituellement, seuls les travailleurs illégaux sont arrêtés et les employeurs ne le sont pas.
C'est le mystérieux système juridique de "l'Etat gouverné".
En arrêtant un employeur conformément à la loi, le crime de promotion de l’emploi illégal est dû au fait que les règles de la société et les sanctions individuelles,
L'impact sur les employeurs est énorme.

Dans la société, cela s'appelle l'adhésion.
La personne judiciaire appellera cela "discrétion".

Je pense que ce problème est grave.
À mesure que le nombre de personnes âgées augmente et que la population active diminue, les salaires augmentent.
Cependant, les salaires ne montent pas.
L'emploi régulier des jeunes diminue rapidement.
La raison en est que les travailleurs étrangers peuvent créer un emploi à court terme avec des salaires peu élevés.
C'est parce que les Japonais sont faits pour concourir dans ce domaine.
Donc, même si vous dites Abenomics, il y a 42% des ménages avec un revenu de 3 millions de yens ou moins.
Les employés non réguliers ne font qu'augmenter.

Cela continuera la semaine prochaine.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, en revanche, s’applique aux employeurs qui ont un "lien de causalité" avec le travail illégal, article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".
Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



************************************

Prénom Yasuhiro
Nom Nagano
Sujet *
S'il vous plaît examiner les documents et nous aider avec la justice.

Analysez le matériel et aidez-nous à la justice.
*********************************************
Adresse e-mail
Adresse * 6-18-9 Takahama Mihama-ku
Code postal *
Ville * Ville de Chiba
Pays Japon

************************************



Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-21: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, das Einwanderungsgesetz ändert sich jedes Jahr. Und ein Großteil der "Einwanderungspolitik" liegt im Ermessen des Justizministers, nicht des Gesetzes. Ein Großteil der "Einwanderungsverwaltung" sollte kein "krimineller Fall" sein. Wenn es zu "Strafverfahren" gezwungen wird, wird es "illegale Bestrafung" wie "dieser Fall".


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-21: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, das Einwanderungsgesetz ändert sich jedes Jahr.
Und ein Großteil der "Einwanderungspolitik" liegt im Ermessen des Justizministers, nicht des Gesetzes.
Ein Großteil der "Einwanderungsverwaltung" sollte kein "krimineller Fall" sein.
Wenn es zu "Strafverfahren" gezwungen wird, wird es "illegale Bestrafung" wie "dieser Fall".


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. Die "Einwanderungsverwaltung" wird von Politikern beeinflusst.
Demokrat "Keiko Chiba" Ehemalige Justizministerin (sie ist Anwältin),
In "Änderung" der "Ministerialverordnung",
Wir haben die "Arbeitsbedingungen" für chinesische ausländische Studenten "abgeschafft".
Ausländische Studierende aus China haben zugegeben, dass "jeder Job" "zeitlich unbegrenzt" sein kann.
Als Hostess bedeutet es "Night Entertainment (Nachtleben) Geschäft".
"Das Personal der Einwanderungsbehörde" kann immer "Nachforschungen zu Hause" mit "Nachforschungen zu Tatsachenrechten" durchführen.
Darüber hinaus hat Keiko Chiba es "Einwanderungsbeamten" und "Polizeibeamten" unmöglich gemacht, "Co-Investigate" durchzuführen.

Das Obige wurde an die "Abe-Regierung" zurückgegeben.

Die Polizei wird das Verfahren der Hausuntersuchung durchlaufen.
Normalerweise werden nur illegale Arbeiter verhaftet und Arbeitgeber nicht.
Dies ist das mysteriöse Rechtssystem des "regierten Staates".
Die gesetzlich vorgeschriebene Festnahme eines Arbeitgebers und die Straftat der illegalen Beschäftigungsförderung sind darauf zurückzuführen, dass sowohl die betrieblichen als auch die individuellen Strafvorschriften
Die Auswirkungen auf die Arbeitgeber sind enorm.

In der Gesellschaft spricht man von Adhäsion.
Die juristische Person nennt dies "Diskretion".

Ich denke, dieses Problem ist ernst.
Mit zunehmender Zahl älterer Menschen und abnehmender Erwerbsbevölkerung steigen die Löhne.
Die Löhne steigen jedoch nicht.
Die reguläre Beschäftigung junger Menschen nimmt rapide ab.
Der Grund dafür ist, dass ausländische Arbeitskräfte mit billigen Löhnen kurzfristig arbeiten können.
Das liegt daran, dass Japaner in diesem Wettbewerb bestehen müssen.
Selbst wenn Sie Abenomics sagen, gibt es 42% der Haushalte mit einem Haushaltseinkommen von 3 Millionen Yen oder weniger.
Nicht reguläre Mitarbeiter nehmen nur zu.

Es wird nächste Woche fortgesetzt.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, die einen "Kausalzusammenhang" mit illegaler Arbeit haben, Artikel 73-2.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".
Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-06-21:Dear Sirs, Immigration Act is changed every year. And much of the "immigration policy" is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice, not the law. Much of the "immigration administration" should not be a "criminal case." If it is forced to "criminal case", it becomes "illegal punishment" like "this case".

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-21:Dear Sirs, Immigration Act is changed every year.
And much of the "immigration policy" is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice,
not the law. Much of the "immigration administration" should not be a "criminal case."
If it is forced to "criminal case", it becomes "illegal punishment" like "this case".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. The "immigration administration" is influenced by politicians.
The Democratic Party's former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba
 (she is a lawyer) has "abolished" the "working conditions"
 for Chinese foreign students in the "change" of "ministerial ordinance".
Foreign students from China have admitted that "any job" can be "in unlimited time".
As a hostess, it means "Night entertainment (nightlife) business".
"The Immigration Bureau staff" can always do "home investigation"
with "rights of fact investigation".
In addition, Keiko Chiba has made it impossible for "immigration officials"
and "police officers" to "coinvestigate".

The above was returned to the "Abe government".

The police will go through the procedure of the house investigation.
Usually, only illegal workers are arrested and employers are not.
This is the mysterious legal system of "the ruled state".
According to the law, if the employer is arrested,
the impact on employers is immense because illegal employment promotion crimes are
both company and individual penalties.

In society, this is called adhesion.
The judicial person will call this "discretion".

I think this problem is serious.
As the number of elderly people increases and the labor force decreases, wages rise.
However, wages do not go up.
Regular employment of young people is decreasing rapidly.
The reason behind this is that foreign workers can make short-term employment with cheap wages.
It is because Japanese are made to compete in this.
So even if you say Abenomics, there are 42% of households
with household income of 3 million yen or less.
Non-regular employees are only increasing.

It will continue next week.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media  2019-06-21:Dear Sirs, Immigration Act is changed every year. And much of the "immigration policy" is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice, not the law. Much of the "immigration administration" should not be a "criminal case." If it is forced to "criminal case", it becomes "illegal punishment" like "this case".

To everyone in the world's media 


2019-06-21:Dear Sirs, Immigration Act is changed every year.
And much of the "immigration policy" is at the discretion of the Minister of Justice,
not the law. Much of the "immigration administration" should not be a "criminal case."
If it is forced to "criminal case", it becomes "illegal punishment" like "this case".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. The "immigration administration" is influenced by politicians.
The Democratic Party's former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba
 (she is a lawyer) has "abolished" the "working conditions"
 for Chinese foreign students in the "change" of "ministerial ordinance".
Foreign students from China have admitted that "any job" can be "in unlimited time".
As a hostess, it means "Night entertainment (nightlife) business".
"The Immigration Bureau staff" can always do "home investigation"
with "rights of fact investigation".
In addition, Keiko Chiba has made it impossible for "immigration officials"
and "police officers" to "coinvestigate".

The above was returned to the "Abe government".

The police will go through the procedure of the house investigation.
Usually, only illegal workers are arrested and employers are not.
This is the mysterious legal system of "the ruled state".
According to the law, if the employer is arrested,
the impact on employers is immense because illegal employment promotion crimes are
both company and individual penalties.

In society, this is called adhesion.
The judicial person will call this "discretion".

I think this problem is serious.
As the number of elderly people increases and the labor force decreases, wages rise.
However, wages do not go up.
Regular employment of young people is decreasing rapidly.
The reason behind this is that foreign workers can make short-term employment with cheap wages.
It is because Japanese are made to compete in this.
So even if you say Abenomics, there are 42% of households
with household income of 3 million yen or less.
Non-regular employees are only increasing.

It will continue next week.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

6/20/2019

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'. He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work" at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence
from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'.
He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work"
at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. It is a "husband" of a Chinese female employee of "L company".
Her "husband" is scheduled to graduate from "Master's program
at Graduate School of Engineering at Chiba University"
and has decided to join "F Bank Computer Service".
Her "husband" submits the "Change of Status of Residence" to "Immigration"
with the "Employment Contract Documents" created by "F Bank Computer Service" attached.

Her "husband" has no desire to "join" F Bank Computer Service.
From "F Bank Computer Service", "year-end present" will reach her "husband".
A colleague's female employee blames her wife.
Your "husband" should immediately say "Decline"
of "joining" to "F Bank Computer Service"! "I rebuke" her.
But she just says, "No problem at all."

If you graduate in March, you will receive a "Visa".
So, finally he sends "Decline" to "F Bank Computer Service".
He "joins" a Chinese-owned company.
The job is "salesmanship".

I am an employee of L company.
He has renewed the "Certificate of Residence" of "Technology".
And on the third day I will not come to the company saying "I will retire".
As a matter of course, the manager
of the administration department asks the immigration authorities to cancel the status
of residence.
However, immigration does not accept protests.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



****** 최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁 ******


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다.
그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


북한 정부는 일본 정부에 '항의'해야합니다.
"일본 정부야말로 외국인 납치 '사건을'해결 '해야한다.
"Same ethnic"이다 "남조선 인" "의"피해자 "는"수천 "있습니다.
"한반도의 인민 '을'대표 '하고 일본 정부에 항의를하십시오!
아베 정권의 약점은 「입관 법 위반 사건 "입니다.
일본이 법에 따라 통치하지 않는 증거의 '사건'입니다.

일본 정부의 '입관 법 위반 "허위을 공표합니다.
7 월 참의원 선거를 향한 이러한 것을 공표하고 일본 정부를 규탄하십시오.
아베 정권은 당황합니다.
아베 정권이 무너지면 다음 정권은 북한에 순종 생각합니다.

북한은 일본 정부가 외국인을 "불법"납치, 감금 "하고있다"고 공표해야한다.
북한은 "일본인 납치 자"보다 많은 "외국인 피해자"가 있는지 "공표"해야합니다.
북한은 세계 언론을 북한의 '아군'으로해야합니다.
북한 정부는 외국 언론이나 유엔에서 발표합니다.
북한 정부는 구체적으로 "내 이름"을 공표합니다. 승인합니다.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************



To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'. He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work" at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence
from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'.
He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work"
at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. It is a "husband" of a Chinese female employee of "L company".
Her "husband" is scheduled to graduate from "Master's program
at Graduate School of Engineering at Chiba University"
and has decided to join "F Bank Computer Service".
Her "husband" submits the "Change of Status of Residence" to "Immigration"
with the "Employment Contract Documents" created by "F Bank Computer Service" attached.

Her "husband" has no desire to "join" F Bank Computer Service.
From "F Bank Computer Service", "year-end present" will reach her "husband".
A colleague's female employee blames her wife.
Your "husband" should immediately say "Decline"
of "joining" to "F Bank Computer Service"! "I rebuke" her.
But she just says, "No problem at all."

If you graduate in March, you will receive a "Visa".
So, finally he sends "Decline" to "F Bank Computer Service".
He "joins" a Chinese-owned company.
The job is "salesmanship".

I am an employee of L company.
He has renewed the "Certificate of Residence" of "Technology".
And on the third day I will not come to the company saying "I will retire".
As a matter of course, the manager
of the administration department asks the immigration authorities to cancel the status
of residence.
However, immigration does not accept protests.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************




Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-20: Chers Messieurs, Les étudiants changent leur statut de résidence d’études étrangères à «technologie». Il "travaillera" à "l'entreprise B" avec la qualification "Technologie" sans faire de "travail" à "l'entreprise A qui a posé sa candidature". "Bureau de l'immigration" dit "OK". La société A n'a pas le droit.


<Courrier public> #MeToo Victimes des droits de l'homme!


Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-20: Chers Messieurs, Les étudiants changent leur statut de résidence d’études étrangères à «technologie».
Il "travaillera" à "l'entreprise B" avec la qualification "Technologie" sans faire de "travail" à "l'entreprise A qui a posé sa candidature".
"Bureau de l'immigration" dit "OK".
La société A n'a pas le droit.


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 C'est un "mari" d'une employée chinoise de la "compagnie L".
Son "mari" devrait obtenir son diplôme du "programme de maîtrise de la Graduate School of Engineering de l'Université de Chiba".
J'ai décidé de rejoindre "F Bank Computer Service".
Son "mari" créé par "F Bank Computer Service"
Joignez «Documents pour le contrat de travail» et soumettez «Demande de changement de statut de résidence» à «Immigration».

Son "mari" n'a aucune envie de "rejoindre" F Bank Computer Service.
De "F Bank Computer Service", "le cadeau de fin d'année" atteindra son "mari".
Une employée d'une collègue blâme sa femme.
Votre "mari" devrait immédiatement dire "Refuser" ou "rejoindre" à "Service informatique de la banque F"!
Et "la réprimander".
Mais elle dit simplement: "Pas de problème du tout."

Si vous obtenez votre diplôme en mars, vous recevrez un "Visa".
Alors, finalement, il envoie "Decline" à "F Bank Computer Service".
Il "rejoint" une société chinoise.
Le travail est "vente".

Je suis un employé de la compagnie L.
Il a renouvelé le "Certificat de résidence" de "Technologie".
Et le troisième jour, je ne viendrai pas à la compagnie en disant "je prendrai ma retraite".
Bien entendu, le responsable du département de l’administration demande aux autorités de l’immigration d’annuler le statut de résident.
Cependant, l'immigration n'accepte pas les protestations.

Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme.
Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, en revanche, s’applique aux employeurs qui ont un "lien de causalité" avec le travail illégal, article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a "puni" que les étrangers,
Je ne "punis" pas "l'employeur".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-20: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Studierende ändern ihren Aufenthaltsstatus von 'Study Abroad' in 'Technology'. Er wird bei "Firma B" mit der Qualifikation "Technologie" "arbeiten", ohne bei "Firma A, die sich beworben hat" "zu arbeiten". "Immigration Bureau" sagt "OK". Firma A hat kein Recht.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-20: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Studierende ändern ihren Aufenthaltsstatus von 'Study Abroad' in 'Technology'.
Er wird bei "Firma B" mit der Qualifikation "Technologie" "arbeiten", ohne bei "Firma A, die sich beworben hat" "zu arbeiten".
"Immigration Bureau" sagt "OK".
Firma A hat kein Recht.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. Es ist ein "Ehemann" einer chinesischen Angestellten der "L Company".
Ihr "Ehemann" soll das "Master-Programm an der Graduate School of Engineering der Chiba University" abschließen.
Ich habe mich für "F Bank Computer Service" entschieden.
Ihr "Ehemann" von "F Bank Computer Service"
Fügen Sie „Arbeitsvertragsunterlagen“ bei und reichen Sie „Antrag auf Änderung des Aufenthaltsstatus“ bei „Einwanderung“ ein.

Ihr "Ehemann" hat keine Lust, dem F Bank Computer Service "beizutreten".
Von "F Bank Computer Service" wird "Jahresendgeschenk" ihren "Ehemann" erreichen.
Die Mitarbeiterin einer Kollegin gibt ihrer Frau die Schuld.
Ihr "Ehemann" sollte sofort "Ablehnen" von "Beitritt" zu "F Bank Computer Service" sagen!
Und sie "zurechtweisen".
Aber sie sagt nur: "Überhaupt kein Problem."

Wenn Sie im März Ihren Abschluss machen, erhalten Sie ein "Visum".
Schließlich sendet er "Ablehnen" an "F Bank Computer Service".
Er "tritt" einer chinesischen Firma bei.
Der Job ist "Verkäufer".

Ich bin Angestellter der Firma L.
Er hat das "Certificate of Residence" von "Technology" erneuert.
Und am dritten Tag werde ich nicht in die Firma kommen und sagen "Ich werde in Rente gehen".
Selbstverständlich bittet der Leiter der Verwaltung die Ausländerbehörden, den Aufenthaltsstatus zu annullieren.
Einwanderung akzeptiert jedoch keine Proteste.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln.
Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, die einen "Kausalzusammenhang" mit illegaler Arbeit haben, Artikel 73-2.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer,
Ich "bestrafe" nicht den "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'. He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work" at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence
from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'.
He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work"
at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. It is a "husband" of a Chinese female employee of "L company".
Her "husband" is scheduled to graduate from "Master's program
at Graduate School of Engineering at Chiba University"
and has decided to join "F Bank Computer Service".
Her "husband" submits the "Change of Status of Residence" to "Immigration"
with the "Employment Contract Documents" created by "F Bank Computer Service" attached.

Her "husband" has no desire to "join" F Bank Computer Service.
From "F Bank Computer Service", "year-end present" will reach her "husband".
A colleague's female employee blames her wife.
Your "husband" should immediately say "Decline"
of "joining" to "F Bank Computer Service"! "I rebuke" her.
But she just says, "No problem at all."

If you graduate in March, you will receive a "Visa".
So, finally he sends "Decline" to "F Bank Computer Service".
He "joins" a Chinese-owned company.
The job is "salesmanship".

I am an employee of L company.
He has renewed the "Certificate of Residence" of "Technology".
And on the third day I will not come to the company saying "I will retire".
As a matter of course, the manager
of the administration department asks the immigration authorities to cancel the status
of residence.
However, immigration does not accept protests.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media  2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'. He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work" at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To everyone in the world's media 


2019-06-20:Dear Sirs, Students change their status of residence
from 'Study Abroad' to 'Technology'.
He will "work" at "Company B" with "Technology" qualification without doing "work"
at "Company A who applied". "Immigration Bureau" says "OK". Company A has no right.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. It is a "husband" of a Chinese female employee of "L company".
Her "husband" is scheduled to graduate from "Master's program
at Graduate School of Engineering at Chiba University"
and has decided to join "F Bank Computer Service".
Her "husband" submits the "Change of Status of Residence" to "Immigration"
with the "Employment Contract Documents" created by "F Bank Computer Service" attached.

Her "husband" has no desire to "join" F Bank Computer Service.
From "F Bank Computer Service", "year-end present" will reach her "husband".
A colleague's female employee blames her wife.
Your "husband" should immediately say "Decline"
of "joining" to "F Bank Computer Service"! "I rebuke" her.
But she just says, "No problem at all."

If you graduate in March, you will receive a "Visa".
So, finally he sends "Decline" to "F Bank Computer Service".
He "joins" a Chinese-owned company.
The job is "salesmanship".

I am an employee of L company.
He has renewed the "Certificate of Residence" of "Technology".
And on the third day I will not come to the company saying "I will retire".
As a matter of course, the manager
of the administration department asks the immigration authorities to cancel the status
of residence.
However, immigration does not accept protests.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

6/19/2019

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-06-19:최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁 ****** 일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다. 이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다. 그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다. 그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다. 지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다. 북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다. 정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오. http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-06-19:Dear Sir, I wrote yesterday. The Minister of Justice issued "status of residence".
However, it is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister not to issue a visa.
Prosecutors think "status of residence status" = "Visa". It's crazy.
Today I will explain "Renewal and Change of Status of Residence".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. If a Chinese resident in Japan changes "status of residence"
from "Study Abroad" to "Technology", etc., or if "Period Renewal" is performed,
the Chinese person will apply directly.

For example, when you enter a job,
the company gives the Chinese person an employment contract,
reasons for employment, a registered copy of the company, a statement of accounts,
and a company guide.
These are described in the "instructions from the section manager",
which is distributed at the Immigration Bureau. (Not a law)

When it comes to from November to December.
The Chinese himself will go to the Immigration Office to submit a status change application form,
a resume, a reason for residence status change, a photo,
a reply postcard, a registered stamp, etc. and "documents received from the company".

In January, there may be a fact confirmation call to the company from Immigration.
As it is a factual investigation, it is the same as the case of invitation.

An example of a Chinese employee who joined L company.
He is the story of the company that took the exam before "L company".
Because the "seal" of the "Employment Contract" is not the "sign of the representative director",
the "immigration staff" conducted the "fact investigation".
The Immigration officials dismissed the application knowing
that the employment contract was a false lie.
The cause was that the "system manager" had created a "fake" employment contract.
It is a violation of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4).
It does not make it a "case".

After that, you will receive a postcard
(reply postcard) of the status of residence change (update).
Please come to Immigration with your diploma.
What to bring is passport ....

When I graduate, I will go to immigration with a diploma (in kind).
You will then be given a "Visa" on your passport in exchange for a postcard,
confirming your diploma.
In the case of renewal, if you go to the immigration office with only a postcard,
you will receive a "Visa" for your passport.

※ The exchange of "immigration control"
with the person is not known to the company unless the person reports.

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



****** 최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁 ******


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다.
그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


북한 정부는 일본 정부에 '항의'해야합니다.
"일본 정부야말로 외국인 납치 '사건을'해결 '해야한다.
"Same ethnic"이다 "남조선 인" "의"피해자 "는"수천 "있습니다.
"한반도의 인민 '을'대표 '하고 일본 정부에 항의를하십시오!
아베 정권의 약점은 「입관 법 위반 사건 "입니다.
일본이 법에 따라 통치하지 않는 증거의 '사건'입니다.

일본 정부의 '입관 법 위반 "허위을 공표합니다.
7 월 참의원 선거를 향한 이러한 것을 공표하고 일본 정부를 규탄하십시오.
아베 정권은 당황합니다.
아베 정권이 무너지면 다음 정권은 북한에 순종 생각합니다.

북한은 일본 정부가 외국인을 "불법"납치, 감금 "하고있다"고 공표해야한다.
북한은 "일본인 납치 자"보다 많은 "외국인 피해자"가 있는지 "공표"해야합니다.
북한은 세계 언론을 북한의 '아군'으로해야합니다.
북한 정부는 외국 언론이나 유엔에서 발표합니다.
북한 정부는 구체적으로 "내 이름"을 공표합니다. 승인합니다.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************



To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-06-19:Dear Sir, I wrote yesterday. The Minister of Justice issued "status of residence". However, it is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister not to issue a visa. Prosecutors think "status of residence status" = "Visa". It's crazy. Today I will explain "Renewal and Change of Status of Residence".

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-19:Dear Sir, I wrote yesterday. The Minister of Justice issued "status of residence".
However, it is not uncommon for the Foreign Minister not to issue a visa.
Prosecutors think "status of residence status" = "Visa". It's crazy.
Today I will explain "Renewal and Change of Status of Residence".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. If a Chinese resident in Japan changes "status of residence"
from "Study Abroad" to "Technology", etc., or if "Period Renewal" is performed,
the Chinese person will apply directly.

For example, when you enter a job,
the company gives the Chinese person an employment contract,
reasons for employment, a registered copy of the company, a statement of accounts,
and a company guide.
These are described in the "instructions from the section manager",
which is distributed at the Immigration Bureau. (Not a law)

When it comes to from November to December.
The Chinese himself will go to the Immigration Office to submit a status change application form,
a resume, a reason for residence status change, a photo,
a reply postcard, a registered stamp, etc. and "documents received from the company".

In January, there may be a fact confirmation call to the company from Immigration.
As it is a factual investigation, it is the same as the case of invitation.

An example of a Chinese employee who joined L company.
He is the story of the company that took the exam before "L company".
Because the "seal" of the "Employment Contract" is not the "sign of the representative director",
the "immigration staff" conducted the "fact investigation".
The Immigration officials dismissed the application knowing
that the employment contract was a false lie.
The cause was that the "system manager" had created a "fake" employment contract.
It is a violation of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4).
It does not make it a "case".

After that, you will receive a postcard
(reply postcard) of the status of residence change (update).
Please come to Immigration with your diploma.
What to bring is passport ....

When I graduate, I will go to immigration with a diploma (in kind).
You will then be given a "Visa" on your passport in exchange for a postcard,
confirming your diploma.
In the case of renewal, if you go to the immigration office with only a postcard,
you will receive a "Visa" for your passport.

※ The exchange of "immigration control"
with the person is not known to the company unless the person reports.

I will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************




Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-19: Chers Messieurs, j'ai écrit hier. Le ministre de la Justice a publié le "statut de résidence". Cependant, il n'est pas rare que le ministre des Affaires étrangères ne délivre pas de visa. Les procureurs pensent "statut de résidence" = "Visa". C'est fou. Aujourd'hui, je vais vous expliquer "Renouvellement et changement de statut de résidence".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-19: Chers Messieurs, j'ai écrit hier.
Le ministre de la Justice a publié le "statut de résidence".
Cependant, il n'est pas rare que le ministre des Affaires étrangères ne délivre pas de visa.
Les procureurs pensent "statut de résidence" = "Visa". C'est fou.
Aujourd'hui, je vais vous expliquer "Renouvellement et changement de statut de résidence".


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 Chinois vivant au Japon "statut de résidence"
Si vous souhaitez passer de "Study Abroad" à "Technology", etc., ou "Renew the Deadline", la personne chinoise postulera directement.

Par exemple, si vous décidez d’entrer un emploi, l’entreprise aura un contrat de travail,
Nous remettons à la personne chinoise de "cahier de motivation d'emploi", "fiche d'enregistrement de société", "livre de comptabilité", "informations sur la société" etc.
Celles-ci sont décrites dans les "instructions du responsable de section", qui sont distribuées au bureau de l'immigration.
(Pas une loi)

Quand il s'agit de novembre à décembre. Les Chinois sont tenus de modifier leur statut de demande de résidence, de reprise,
Raison du changement de statut de résidence, photos, cartes postales,
J'irai à l'immigration et soumettrai moi-même le tampon d'enregistrement, etc., ainsi que les "documents que j'ai reçus de l'entreprise".

En janvier, il se peut qu'un appel de confirmation des faits à l'entreprise soit envoyé par Immigration.
Comme il s’agit d’une enquête factuelle, c’est la même chose que dans le cas d’une invitation.

Un exemple d’employé chinois qui a rejoint la société L.
Il est l'histoire de la société qui a passé l'examen avant "L company".
Parce que "Sceau" de "Contrat de travail" n'est pas "La marque du directeur représentant"
"Le personnel impérial" a fait "une enquête factuelle".
Les fonctionnaires de l'immigration ont rejeté la demande, sachant que le contrat de travail était un faux mensonge.
La cause en était que le "gestionnaire du système" avait créé un "faux" contrat de travail.
C'est une violation de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4- (4).
Cela n'en fait pas un "cas".

Après cela, vous recevrez une carte postale indiquant le statut de changement de résidence (mise à jour).
S'il vous plaît venez à l'immigration avec votre diplôme.
Ce qu'il faut apporter, c'est un passeport ....

Quand j'aurai mon diplôme, j'irai à l'immigration avec un diplôme (en nature).
Vous recevrez ensuite un "visa" sur votre passeport en échange d'une carte postale confirmant votre diplôme.
En cas de renouvellement, si vous vous rendez au bureau de l'immigration avec seulement une carte postale, vous recevrez un "Visa" pour votre passeport.

Exchange L'échange de "contrôle d'immigration" avec la personne n'est pas connu de l'entreprise à moins que la personne ne la signale.

Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, en revanche, s’applique aux employeurs qui ont un "lien de causalité" avec le travail illégal, article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".
Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



************************************

Prénom Yasuhiro
Nom Nagano
Sujet *
S'il vous plaît examiner les documents et nous aider avec la justice.

Analysez le matériel et aidez-nous à la justice.
*********************************************
Adresse e-mail
Adresse * 6-18-9 Takahama Mihama-ku
Code postal *
Ville * Ville de Chiba
Pays Japon

************************************


Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-19: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich habe gestern geschrieben. Der Justizminister erteilte "Aufenthaltsstatus". Es ist jedoch nicht ungewöhnlich, dass der Außenminister kein Visum ausstellt. Staatsanwälte meinen "Aufenthaltsstatus" = "Visum". Es ist verrückt. Heute werde ich "Erneuerung und Änderung des Aufenthaltsstatus" erklären.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-19: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich habe gestern geschrieben.
Der Justizminister erteilte "Aufenthaltsstatus".
Es ist jedoch nicht ungewöhnlich, dass der Außenminister kein Visum ausstellt.
Staatsanwälte meinen "Aufenthaltsstatus" = "Visum". Es ist verrückt.
Heute werde ich "Erneuerung und Änderung des Aufenthaltsstatus" erklären.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. In Japan lebende Chinesen "Aufenthaltsstatus"
Wenn Sie von "Study Abroad" zu "Technology" usw. oder "Renew the Deadline" wechseln möchten, wird sich die chinesische Person direkt bewerben.

Wenn Sie sich zum Beispiel für einen Job entscheiden, hat das Unternehmen einen Arbeitsvertrag.
Ich übergebe eine chinesische Person eines "Grundbuches der Beschäftigung", eines "Registrierungsdatensatzes der Firma", eines "Buchhaltungsbuches", einer "Firmeninformation" usw.
Diese sind in den "Anweisungen des Abteilungsleiters" beschrieben, die bei der Einwanderungsbehörde verteilt werden.
(Kein Gesetz)

Wenn es um von November bis Dezember geht. Chinesen müssen ihren Aufenthaltsstatus ändern, ihren Lebenslauf
Grund für die Änderung des Aufenthaltsstatus, Fotos, Postkarten,
Ich werde zur Einwanderung gehen und den Registrierungsstempel usw. und die "Dokumente, die ich von der Firma erhalten habe" selbst einreichen.

Im Januar wird das Unternehmen möglicherweise von der Einwanderungsbehörde eine Bestätigung erhalten.
Da es sich um eine Tatsachenermittlung handelt, handelt es sich auch um eine Einladung.

Ein Beispiel eines chinesischen Mitarbeiters, der sich der Firma L angeschlossen hat.
Er ist die Geschichte des Unternehmens, das die Prüfung vor "L Unternehmen" abgelegt hat.
Weil "Siegel" des "Arbeitsvertrags" nicht "Zeichen des stellvertretenden Direktors" ist
"Kaiserlicher Stab" hat "Tatsachenermittlung" durchgeführt.
Die Einwanderungsbeamten wiesen den Antrag in dem Wissen ab, dass der Arbeitsvertrag eine falsche Lüge war.
Die Ursache war, dass der "Systemmanager" einen "falschen" Arbeitsvertrag erstellt hatte.
Es ist ein Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz 22-4- (4).
Es macht es nicht zu einem "Fall".

Danach erhalten Sie eine Postkarte (Antwortpostkarte) über den Status der Aufenthaltsänderung (Aktualisierung).
Bitte kommen Sie mit Ihrem Diplom zur Einwanderung.
Was mitzubringen ist Reisepass ....

Wenn ich meinen Abschluss mache, werde ich mit einem Diplom (in Form von Sachleistungen) zur Einwanderung gehen.
Sie erhalten dann ein "Visum" für Ihren Reisepass gegen eine Postkarte, die Ihr Diplom bestätigt.
Wenn Sie im Falle einer Verlängerung nur mit einer Postkarte zur Ausländerbehörde gehen, erhalten Sie ein "Visum" für Ihren Reisepass.

※ Der Austausch der "Einwanderungskontrolle" mit der Person ist dem Unternehmen nicht bekannt, es sei denn, die Person meldet sich.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, die einen "Kausalzusammenhang" mit illegaler Arbeit haben, Artikel 73-2.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".
Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


2025-02-03: أعتقد أنه سيكون من الأفضل إعطاء نصف الجانب الروسي من الأراضي الأوكرانية لروسيا، ويجب على روسيا إعطاء الأراضي المتبقية، باستثناء "منطقة دونباس"، لـ "الأكراد المتجولين".

 2025-02-03: إصدار الأسبوع. ناشد ترامب بوتن إنهاء الحرب الأوكرانية وحذر من أنه سيفرض تدابير عقابية جديدة إذا رفض إنهاء الحرب قريبًا. يقترح م...