Opinion Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-07-09: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, In Japan ist die "Justizkriminalität" weiterhin "weit verbreitet".

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-07-09: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, In Japan ist die "Justizkriminalität" weiterhin "weit verbreitet".
Die Staatsanwaltschaft "irrt" absichtlich die Anwendung des "Gesetzes", um die "Guten" zu Tätern zu machen.
Bitte lesen Sie "PDF des Anklageschreibens".
Dieses Anklageschreiben verstößt gegen geltendes Recht.
Das Personal des Weißen Hauses versteht es immer noch nicht.
Die US-Regierung soll den Opfern der "Amerikaner" helfen.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Bitte beachten Sie das "Anklageschreiben" auf der "Site" weiter unten.
In diesem Fall ist es möglich, "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" nur unter "Anklageschreiben" zu verstehen.

Bitte beachten Sie die PDF-Dateien "Englische Übersetzung" und "Japanisches Original".
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.

● Übersetzung ins Englische "Anklageschreiben"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient als Referenz. Genau, bitte gehen Sie alleine.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf

● Japanischer Originaltext "Verfahrensschreiben Anklageschreiben"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie im obigen "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf



Teil 1. Wir haben nicht gegen das Gesetz des japanischen Parlaments verstoßen.
Bei den von Polizeibeamten und Staatsanwälten ergriffenen Maßnahmen handelt es sich um Artikel 172 des Strafgesetzbuchs "Verbrechen falscher Anschuldigungen".
Und weil sie "rechtswidrige Verhaftung und Inhaftierung" hatten, Artikel 194 des Strafgesetzbuches
Es ist "Verbrechen des Missbrauchs der Autorität durch einen speziellen Beamten".

Außerdem ordnete der Richter rechtswidrig "Verhaftung und Inhaftierung" an,
Das Strafrecht lautet Artikel 194 "Sünde, wenn ein Sonderbeamter seine Befugnisse missbraucht", weil er ein "unfaires" Verfahren eingeleitet hat.

Es ist nicht erforderlich, "absichtlich" als "Anforderungen an die Zusammensetzung von Straftaten" gemäß Artikel 194 des Strafgesetzbuchs nachzuweisen.
(Dies ist ein Beispiel für das Urteil des Obersten Gerichtshofs).
Das ist natürlich.
Es gibt keinen Grund, warum die Justiz das Gesetz nicht kannte.

Ich wurde 2010 im Falle einer Beihilfe wegen Verstoßes gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz verhaftet.
Im April 2011 entschied das Bezirksgericht Tokio in anderthalb Jahren eine "Arbeitsstrafe" und eine Geldstrafe von 1 Million Yen.
Ich habe beim Obersten Gerichtshof "Berufung eingelegt".
Das Gericht ist kein "Verfassungsverstoß".
Sie macht lediglich den "anwendungsrechtlichen Fehler" geltend.
Daher ist das "Nicht zu diskutierende Thema" des Obersten Gerichtshofs unter der "Strafprozessordnung".
Und "abgelehnt" aus dem Grund.
Ich war inhaftiert und wurde am 19. März 2013 bei "Maturity" aus dem Gefängnis entlassen.

Nach der Strafprozessordnung sind "Wiederaufnahmeansprüche" aus Gründen des "Rechtsfehlers" nicht zulässig.
Wenn jedoch eine "Straftat" eines Polizeibeamten oder eines Staatsanwalts vorliegt, können Sie "eine Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens beantragen".
Nachdem ich aus dem Gefängnis entlassen wurde
Von etwa Mai 2014 bis Anfang August haben wir eine "Strafanzeige" bei der "Bezirksstaatsanwaltschaft Tokio" eingereicht.

Ich habe eine "Anklage" gegen die Staatsanwaltschaft des Bezirks Tokio wegen "Chinesen" erhoben.
Der chinesische "kinGungaku", der als Komplize gilt, ist ein "Opfer" aufgrund der gleichen "Verletzung des anwendbaren Rechts" wie "ich".
Die vier Chinesen, die nach Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Illegale Beschäftigung wegen unqualifizierter Tätigkeiten" bestraft wurden, sind nicht schuldig.
Der Grund dafür ist, dass der Arbeitgeber nicht für das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 73-2 "Sünde wegen Förderung illegaler Arbeit" "bestraft" wurde.
Daher verstößt es gegen internationales Recht und gegen die Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz.

Die Staatsanwaltschaft "räumt" den Verstoß gegen geltendes Recht weiterhin nicht ein.
Wir brauchen die Unterstützung der internationalen Gemeinschaft.
Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer,
Ich "bestrafe" nicht den "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-07-09:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-07-09:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".
The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application
of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.
Please see "PDF of Indictment Letter".
This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law.
White House staff still do not understand.
The US government should help the victims of the "American".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "letter of indictment" at the following site.
In this case, it is possible to understand "error of applicable law" only by "indictment letter of indictment".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.

● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. We have not violated the law established in the Japanese parliament.
The actions taken by police officers
and prosecutors are Article 172 of the Penal Code "Crimes of false accusation".
And because they did "illegal arrest and imprisonment",
they are Article 194 "Crimes of abuse of authority by special public officer" of criminal law.

In addition, because the judge made an "unfair" trial,
which ordered "arrest and imprisonment" illegally,
it is the criminal law Article 194 "a crime that a special public employee abused his authority".

It is not necessary to prove "Deliberately" as "Crime composition requirements"
under Article 194 of the Penal Code. (This is an example of the Supreme Court ruling).
It is natural.
There is no reason why the judiciary did not know the law.

I was arrested in 2010 for assistance in violation of the Immigration Control Act,
and in April 2011, I was sentenced to one and a half years of "a punishment for labor"
and a fine of 1 million yen by the Tokyo District Court.
I "appealed" to the Supreme Court.
The court is not a "constitutional violation".
It merely asserts that "application law error".
Therefore, the Supreme Court's "Not a matter to be discussed"
under the "Criminal Procedure Code".
And "rejected" for the reason.
I was imprisoned and was released from jail on March 19, 2013 at "Maturity".

Under the Code of Criminal Procedure,
"claims for retrial" are not permitted for reasons of "error in applicable law".
However, if there is a "criminal fact" of a police officer or a public prosecutor,
you can "request for a retrial."
After being released from prison,
I filed a "criminal complaint" with the "Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"
from around May 2014 to the beginning of August.

I did "indictment" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office about "Chinese".
The Chinese "kinGungaku"
who is considered as accomplice is a "victim" due to the same "violation
of applicable law" as "I".
The four Chinese who have been punished under Article 70
of the Immigration Act "illegal employment due to unqualified activities" are not guilty.
The reason is that the employer has not been "punished"
for immigration control law Article 73-2 "Sin for promoting illegal work".
Therefore it violates international law and violates equality under the law.

The prosecution still "does not admit" the violation of the applicable law.
We need the support of the international community.
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion To everyone in the world's media 2019-07-09:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-07-09:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".
The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application
of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.
Please see "PDF of Indictment Letter".
This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law.
White House staff still do not understand.
The US government should help the victims of the "American".


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "letter of indictment" at the following site.
In this case, it is possible to understand "error of applicable law" only by "indictment letter of indictment".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.

● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. We have not violated the law established in the Japanese parliament.
The actions taken by police officers
and prosecutors are Article 172 of the Penal Code "Crimes of false accusation".
And because they did "illegal arrest and imprisonment",
they are Article 194 "Crimes of abuse of authority by special public officer" of criminal law.

In addition, because the judge made an "unfair" trial,
which ordered "arrest and imprisonment" illegally,
it is the criminal law Article 194 "a crime that a special public employee abused his authority".

It is not necessary to prove "Deliberately" as "Crime composition requirements"
under Article 194 of the Penal Code. (This is an example of the Supreme Court ruling).
It is natural.
There is no reason why the judiciary did not know the law.

I was arrested in 2010 for assistance in violation of the Immigration Control Act,
and in April 2011, I was sentenced to one and a half years of "a punishment for labor"
and a fine of 1 million yen by the Tokyo District Court.
I "appealed" to the Supreme Court.
The court is not a "constitutional violation".
It merely asserts that "application law error".
Therefore, the Supreme Court's "Not a matter to be discussed"
under the "Criminal Procedure Code".
And "rejected" for the reason.
I was imprisoned and was released from jail on March 19, 2013 at "Maturity".

Under the Code of Criminal Procedure,
"claims for retrial" are not permitted for reasons of "error in applicable law".
However, if there is a "criminal fact" of a police officer or a public prosecutor,
you can "request for a retrial."
After being released from prison,
I filed a "criminal complaint" with the "Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"
from around May 2014 to the beginning of August.

I did "indictment" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office about "Chinese".
The Chinese "kinGungaku"
who is considered as accomplice is a "victim" due to the same "violation
of applicable law" as "I".
The four Chinese who have been punished under Article 70
of the Immigration Act "illegal employment due to unqualified activities" are not guilty.
The reason is that the employer has not been "punished"
for immigration control law Article 73-2 "Sin for promoting illegal work".
Therefore it violates international law and violates equality under the law.

The prosecution still "does not admit" the violation of the applicable law.
We need the support of the international community.
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes
in criminal law" against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".
The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application
of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.
Please see "PDF of Indictment Letter".
The fact that “Chinese people” violated Article 70 paragraph 1 item 4 of the Immigration Act.
The fact that "Chinese people" submitted Article 22-4- (4)
of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents".
The fact that "I and Kingungakuga" "granted" false documents "to" Chinese "is described.
This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4



Please see "letter of indictment" at the following site.
In this case, it is possible to understand "error of applicable law" only by "indictment letter of indictment".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.

● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf

● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf



Part 1. An incident that assisted the Immigration Control Act violation
(extra-qualification activity).
In May 2010, a "Chinese" was arrested
for violating the Immigration Act 70-1- (4) "extra-qualification activity."
In May 2010, Company L received a "home investigation" on suspicion
of "helping" Article 70-1- (4) of the Immigration Control Act "non-qualified activity".
I was arrested on June 14, 2010.
The reason is that “we issued” “Chinese people”
with “Contents lie fake Employment contract documents” described in Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is Article 62 of the Penal Code "Sin to Support Other Crimes"
for the violation of Article 70-1- (4) "Actual Status of Residence" for "Chinese".
Do you understand? The "Applying Law" is "changing".

I argued.
I. Acts prescribed by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sin to promote unlawful employment",
which is "a crime of assistance" against "unlawful employment"
of Article 70, paragraph 1 and Article 19, paragraph 1 of the Immigration Act I did not.

The police officer said, "You should admit the crime in the" general theory ".
And the police "sent" me to the "Tokyo District Public Prosecution."
I said to the prosecutor that the act of "supporting"
under the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4), which is the "reason for crime"
of "Indictment Letter", is "not a crime".
The prosecutor said "everyone does not" credit "your" telling ".
"The lawyer" asked the prosecutor to release me.
The prosecutor "rejected" the "request" because "the trial can not be maintained".
And the prosecutor "indicted" me.

Japan is the only country that makes people criminal in the "general theory".
However, the Constitution of Japan stipulates in Article 31 that punishment can only be punished by the law enacted in the Diet.

The "reason for prosecution" and the "decision reason" were
that I issued "documents of employment contract" whose "content is false" to the Chinese,
so the Chinese were able to easily obtain "qualification of residence",
So they were able to "stay" in Japan.
Because they were able to stay in Japan, they said that they were able to "illegal working."

However, if a foreigner submits a "contract document
for employment with false content" and "acquires status of residence",
it is "cancellation of status of residence" in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act. .

The “employment contract document whose content is false” is written as “falsehood documents”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
"Falsehood documents" has been changed to "documents with misrepresented" in subsequent changes.

All four Chinese have not received "cancellation of status of residence"
and "administrative disposition" of "deportation" from the Minister of Justice
for having submitted "false documents".
Even if it receives it, it is an "administrative disposition" of "deportation".
Therefore, he asserted that Article 60
of the Criminal Code "Sin to support other crimes" is not applicable.

The prosecution still "does not admit" the violation of the applicable law.
We need the support of the international community.
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


******　최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁　******


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다.
그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


북한 정부는 일본 정부에 '항의'해야합니다.
"일본 정부야말로 외국인 납치 '사건을'해결 '해야한다.
"Same ethnic"이다 "남조선 인" "의"피해자 "는"수천 "있습니다.
"한반도의 인민 '을'대표 '하고 일본 정부에 항의를하십시오!
아베 정권의 약점은 「입관 법 위반 사건 "입니다.
일본이 법에 따라 통치하지 않는 증거의 '사건'입니다.

일본 정부의 '입관 법 위반 "허위을 공표합니다.
7 월 참의원 선거를 향한 이러한 것을 공표하고 일본 정부를 규탄하십시오.
아베 정권은 당황합니다.
아베 정권이 무너지면 다음 정권은 북한에 순종 생각합니다.

북한은 일본 정부가 외국인을 "불법"납치, 감금 "하고있다"고 공표해야한다.
북한은 "일본인 납치 자"보다 많은 "외국인 피해자"가 있는지 "공표"해야합니다.
북한은 세계 언론을 북한의 '아군'으로해야합니다.
북한 정부는 외국 언론이나 유엔에서 발표합니다.
북한 정부는 구체적으로 "내 이름"을 공표합니다. 승인합니다.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump 2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant". The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.

To President Trump


2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".
The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application
of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.
Please see "PDF of Indictment Letter".
The fact that “Chinese people” violated Article 70 paragraph 1 item 4 of the Immigration Act.
The fact that "Chinese people" submitted Article 22-4- (4)
of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents".
The fact that "I and Kingungakuga" "granted" false documents "to" Chinese "is described.
This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "letter of indictment" at the following site.
In this case, it is possible to understand "error of applicable law" only by "indictment letter of indictment".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.

● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf

● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. An incident that assisted the Immigration Control Act violation
(extra-qualification activity).
In May 2010, a "Chinese" was arrested
for violating the Immigration Act 70-1- (4) "extra-qualification activity."
In May 2010, Company L received a "home investigation" on suspicion
of "helping" Article 70-1- (4) of the Immigration Control Act "non-qualified activity".
I was arrested on June 14, 2010.
The reason is that “we issued” “Chinese people”
with “Contents lie fake Employment contract documents” described in Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is Article 62 of the Penal Code "Sin to Support Other Crimes"
for the violation of Article 70-1- (4) "Actual Status of Residence" for "Chinese".
Do you understand? The "Applying Law" is "changing".

I argued.
I. Acts prescribed by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sin to promote unlawful employment",
which is "a crime of assistance" against "unlawful employment"
of Article 70, paragraph 1 and Article 19, paragraph 1 of the Immigration Act I did not.

The police officer said, "You should admit the crime in the" general theory ".
And the police "sent" me to the "Tokyo District Public Prosecution."
I said to the prosecutor that the act of "supporting"
under the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4), which is the "reason for crime"
of "Indictment Letter", is "not a crime".
The prosecutor said "everyone does not" credit "your" telling ".
"The lawyer" asked the prosecutor to release me.
The prosecutor "rejected" the "request" because "the trial can not be maintained".
And the prosecutor "indicted" me.

Japan is the only country that makes people criminal in the "general theory".
However, the Constitution of Japan stipulates in Article 31 that punishment can only be punished by the law enacted in the Diet.

The "reason for prosecution" and the "decision reason" were
that I issued "documents of employment contract" whose "content is false" to the Chinese,
so the Chinese were able to easily obtain "qualification of residence",
So they were able to "stay" in Japan.
Because they were able to stay in Japan, they said that they were able to "illegal working."

However, if a foreigner submits a "contract document
for employment with false content" and "acquires status of residence",
it is "cancellation of status of residence" in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act. .

The “employment contract document whose content is false” is written as “falsehood documents”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
"Falsehood documents" has been changed to "documents with misrepresented" in subsequent changes.

All four Chinese have not received "cancellation of status of residence"
and "administrative disposition" of "deportation" from the Minister of Justice
for having submitted "false documents".
Even if it receives it, it is an "administrative disposition" of "deportation".
Therefore, he asserted that Article 60
of the Criminal Code "Sin to support other crimes" is not applicable.

The prosecution still "does not admit" the violation of the applicable law.
We need the support of the international community.
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-07-08: Chers Messieurs, Au Japon, le "crime judiciaire" continue de "se répandre".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-07-08: Chers Messieurs, Au Japon, le "crime judiciaire" continue de "se répandre".
L'accusation "se trompe" à dessein sur l'application de la "loi" pour faire des "bonnes personnes" les contrevenants.
Veuillez consulter "PDF de la lettre d'accusation".
Le fait que le «peuple chinois» ait enfreint l'article 70, paragraphe 1, point 4 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Le fait que le "peuple chinois" ait soumis l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration "Présentation de faux documents".
Le fait que "moi-même et Kingungakuga" aient "accordé de" faux documents "à" chinois "est décrit.
Cette lettre d'accusation est une violation de la loi applicable.


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4



Veuillez consulter la "lettre d'accusation" du "site" ci-dessous.
Dans ce cas, il est possible de comprendre "erreur de droit applicable" uniquement par "lettre d'acte d'accusation".

Veuillez consulter les fichiers PDF "Traduction anglaise" et "Original japonais".
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent sur le traitement des informations personnelles.

● Traduction en anglais "Acte d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence. Exactement, veuillez y aller seul.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf

● Texte original japonais "Lettre d'acte d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Pour la traduction en anglais, veuillez consulter le "PDF" ci-dessus.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Partie 1 Un incident qui a contribué à la violation de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration (activité de qualification supplémentaire).
En mai 2010, un "Chinois" a été arrêté pour avoir enfreint la "Loi sur l'immigration extra-qualifiée" de la Loi sur l'immigration 70-1- (4).
En mai 2010, la société L a fait l'objet d'une "enquête à domicile", soupçonnée d'avoir "aidé" l'article 70-1 à 4) de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration "d'activité non qualifiée".
J'ai été arrêté le 14 juin 2010.
La raison est décrite à l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration
C'est parce que "nous" avons publié "le peuple chinois" avec "Contenus mensonges faux contrats de travail".
C'est contre la violation de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70-1- (4) "Actualité en dehors du statut de résidence" de "Chinois"
Article 62 du Code pénal "Péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes".
Comprenez-vous? La "loi d'application" est "en train de changer".

Je me suis disputé.
Je suis en vertu de l'article 70, paragraphe 1 et de l'article 19, paragraphe 1, point 1 de la loi sur l'immigration
Article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration, qui constitue "un crime d'assistance" pour "travail illégal"
Aucun acte n'est prescrit par "un crime qui favorise le travail illégal".

Le policier a déclaré: "Vous devriez admettre le crime dans la" théorie générale ".
Et la police m'a "envoyée" au "parquet du district de Tokyo".
Je suis un "motif de crime" du procureur de "Lettre d'accusation"
Le fait de "soutenir" en vertu de l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration stipule que "ce n'est pas un crime".
Le procureur a déclaré que "tout le monde ne" crédite pas "votre" raconter ".
"L'avocat" a demandé au procureur de me libérer.
Le procureur a "rejeté" la "demande" car "le procès ne peut pas être maintenu".
Et le procureur m'a "inculpé".

Le Japon est le seul pays à criminaliser les gens dans la "théorie générale".
L'article 31 de la Constitution du Japon stipule toutefois que les sanctions ne peuvent être punies que par la loi adoptée par la Diète.

«Motif de la poursuite» et «motif du jugement»
Parce que nous avons publié le "document de contrat de travail" de "le contenu est faux faux" aux Chinois,
Les Chinois ont facilement pu obtenir un statut de résidence et ont donc pu "rester au Japon".
Parce qu'ils ont pu rester au Japon, ils ont affirmé qu'ils étaient capables de "travailler illégalement".

Toutefois, les étrangers doivent soumettre des "documents contractuels pour un emploi dont le contenu est faux"
Si vous avez acquis un "certificat de résidence", il s'agit de "la suppression du statut de résidence" au sens de l'article 22-4- 4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

"Les documents contractuels relatifs à un emploi dont le contenu est faux" ne sont pas applicables en vertu de l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est écrit en tant que "documents de mensonge".
"Documents de mensonge" a été remplacé par "documents avec représentation erronée" dans les modifications ultérieures.

Les quatre Chinois ont déclaré avoir tous soumis de "faux documents" du ministre de la Justice
Nous n'avons pas reçu "annulation du statut de résidence" et "disposition administrative" de "déportation".
Même s'il le reçoit, il s'agit d'une "disposition administrative" de "déportation".
Par conséquent, il a affirmé que l'article 60 du Code pénal "Le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes" n'est pas applicable.

L’accusation "n’admet toujours pas" la violation du droit applicable.
Nous avons besoin de l'appui de la communauté internationale.
Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-07-08: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, In Japan ist die "Justizkriminalität" weiterhin "weit verbreitet".

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-07-08: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, In Japan ist die "Justizkriminalität" weiterhin "weit verbreitet".
Die Staatsanwaltschaft "irrt" absichtlich die Anwendung des "Gesetzes", um die "Guten" zu Tätern zu machen.
Bitte lesen Sie "PDF des Anklageschreibens".
Die Tatsache, dass „Chinesen“ gegen Artikel 70 Absatz 1 Punkt 4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstießen.
Die Tatsache, dass "Chinesen" Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Vorlage von falschen Dokumenten" eingereicht.
Die Tatsache, dass "ich und Kingungakuga" "Chinesen" falsche Dokumente "verliehen", wird beschrieben.
Dieses Anklageschreiben verstößt gegen geltendes Recht.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Bitte beachten Sie das "Anklageschreiben" auf der "Site" weiter unten.
In diesem Fall ist es möglich, "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" nur unter "Anklageschreiben" zu verstehen.

Bitte beachten Sie die PDF-Dateien "Englische Übersetzung" und "Japanisches Original".
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.

● Übersetzung ins Englische "Anklageschreiben"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient als Referenz. Genau, bitte gehen Sie alleine.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf

● Japanischer Originaltext "Verfahrensschreiben Anklageschreiben"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie im obigen "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Teil 1. Ein Vorfall, der zur Verletzung des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes beigetragen hat (Zusatzqualifizierungsmaßnahme).
Im Mai 2010 wurde ein "Chinese" wegen Verstoßes gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz 70-1- (4) "Extraqualifizierungsaktivität" festgenommen.
Im Mai 2010 erhielt das Unternehmen L eine "Hausuntersuchung" wegen des Verdachts, Artikel 70-1- (4) des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "nicht qualifizierte Tätigkeit" zu "unterstützen".
Ich wurde am 14. Juni 2010 verhaftet.
Der Grund ist in Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes beschrieben
Es ist, weil "wir" "Chinesen" mit "Inhalten liegen gefälschte Arbeitsvertragsunterlagen" ausgestellt.
Dies ist gegen die Verletzung des Immigration Control Act 70-1- (4) "Aktualität außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus" von "Chinese"
Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuches "Sünde, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Verstehst du? Das "Anwenden von Gesetzen" "ändert sich".

Ich habe gestritten.
Ich bin nach Artikel 70 Absatz 1 und Artikel 19 Absatz 1 Punkt 1 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes, der "ein Verbrechen der Unterstützung" für "illegale Arbeit" ist
Es gibt keine Handlung, die von "einem Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert" vorgeschrieben wird.

Der Polizist sagte: "Sie sollten das Verbrechen in der" allgemeinen Theorie "zugeben.
Und die Polizei "schickte" mich zur "Staatsanwaltschaft des Bezirks Tokio".
Ich bin der "Grund für das Verbrechen" eines Staatsanwalts in "Anklageschreiben"
Der Akt der "Unterstützung" gemäß Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes besagte, dass "es kein Verbrechen ist".
Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte, "jeder" schreibt "Ihr" Erzählen "nicht gut".
"Der Anwalt" bat den Staatsanwalt, mich freizulassen.
Der Staatsanwalt "lehnte" den "Antrag" ab, weil "der Prozess nicht aufrecht erhalten werden kann".
Und der Staatsanwalt hat mich "angeklagt".

Japan ist das einzige Land, das Menschen in der "allgemeinen Theorie" kriminell macht.
Die Verfassung von Japan sieht jedoch in Artikel 31 vor, dass die Bestrafung nur durch das im Landtag erlassene Gesetz geahndet werden kann.

"Strafverfolgungsgrund" und "Urteilsgrund"
Weil wir das "Dokument des Arbeitsvertrags" von "der Inhalt ist falsch falsch" an die Chinesen ausgestellt haben,
Chinesen konnten leicht einen Aufenthaltsstatus erlangen, so dass sie "in Japan bleiben" konnten.
Weil sie in Japan bleiben konnten, sagten sie, sie könnten "illegal arbeiten".

Ausländer müssen jedoch „Vertragsdokumente für eine Beschäftigung vorlegen, deren Inhalt falsch ist“
Wenn Sie eine "Aufenthaltsbescheinigung" erworben haben, handelt es sich um eine "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" gemäß Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

"Vertragsdokumente für eine Beschäftigung, deren Inhalt falsch ist" gelten nicht nach Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist als "Falschdokumente" geschrieben.
"Falschdokumente" wurde in späteren Änderungen in "Dokumente mit falscher Darstellung" geändert.

Die vier Chinesen gaben an, dass sie alle "falsche Dokumente" vom Justizminister eingereicht hätten
Wir haben keine "Annullierung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "administrative Anordnung" der "Abschiebung" erhalten.
Selbst wenn es es erhält, ist es eine "administrative Disposition" der "Abschiebung".
Daher machte er geltend, dass Artikel 60 des Strafgesetzbuchs "Sünde zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" nicht anwendbar sei.

Die Staatsanwaltschaft "räumt" den Verstoß gegen geltendes Recht weiterhin nicht ein.
Wir brauchen die Unterstützung der internationalen Gemeinschaft.
Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".
The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application
of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.
Please see "PDF of Indictment Letter".
The fact that “Chinese people” violated Article 70 paragraph 1 item 4 of the Immigration Act.
The fact that "Chinese people" submitted Article 22-4- (4)
of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents".
The fact that "I and Kingungakuga" "granted" false documents "to" Chinese "is described.
This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "letter of indictment" at the following site.
In this case, it is possible to understand "error of applicable law" only by "indictment letter of indictment".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.

● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. An incident that assisted the Immigration Control Act violation
(extra-qualification activity).
In May 2010, a "Chinese" was arrested
for violating the Immigration Act 70-1- (4) "extra-qualification activity."
In May 2010, Company L received a "home investigation" on suspicion
of "helping" Article 70-1- (4) of the Immigration Control Act "non-qualified activity".
I was arrested on June 14, 2010.
The reason is that “we issued” “Chinese people”
with “Contents lie fake Employment contract documents” described in Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is Article 62 of the Penal Code "Sin to Support Other Crimes"
for the violation of Article 70-1- (4) "Actual Status of Residence" for "Chinese".
Do you understand? The "Applying Law" is "changing".

I argued.
I. Acts prescribed by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sin to promote unlawful employment",
which is "a crime of assistance" against "unlawful employment"
of Article 70, paragraph 1 and Article 19, paragraph 1 of the Immigration Act I did not.

The police officer said, "You should admit the crime in the" general theory ".
And the police "sent" me to the "Tokyo District Public Prosecution."
I said to the prosecutor that the act of "supporting"
under the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4), which is the "reason for crime"
of "Indictment Letter", is "not a crime".
The prosecutor said "everyone does not" credit "your" telling ".
"The lawyer" asked the prosecutor to release me.
The prosecutor "rejected" the "request" because "the trial can not be maintained".
And the prosecutor "indicted" me.

Japan is the only country that makes people criminal in the "general theory".
However, the Constitution of Japan stipulates in Article 31 that punishment can only be punished by the law enacted in the Diet.

The "reason for prosecution" and the "decision reason" were
that I issued "documents of employment contract" whose "content is false" to the Chinese,
so the Chinese were able to easily obtain "qualification of residence",
So they were able to "stay" in Japan.
Because they were able to stay in Japan, they said that they were able to "illegal working."

However, if a foreigner submits a "contract document
for employment with false content" and "acquires status of residence",
it is "cancellation of status of residence" in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act. .

The “employment contract document whose content is false” is written as “falsehood documents”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
"Falsehood documents" has been changed to "documents with misrepresented" in subsequent changes.

All four Chinese have not received "cancellation of status of residence"
and "administrative disposition" of "deportation" from the Minister of Justice
for having submitted "false documents".
Even if it receives it, it is an "administrative disposition" of "deportation".
Therefore, he asserted that Article 60
of the Criminal Code "Sin to support other crimes" is not applicable.

The prosecution still "does not admit" the violation of the applicable law.
We need the support of the international community.
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-07-08:Dear Sirs, In Japan, "judicial crime" continues to "rampant".
The prosecution purposely "mistakes" the application
of the "law" to make the "good people" the offenders.
Please see "PDF of Indictment Letter".
The fact that “Chinese people” violated Article 70 paragraph 1 item 4 of the Immigration Act.
The fact that "Chinese people" submitted Article 22-4- (4)
of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents".
The fact that "I and Kingungakuga" "granted" false documents "to" Chinese "is described.
This Indictment letter is a violation of the applicable law.


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "letter of indictment" at the following site.
In this case, it is possible to understand "error of applicable law" only by "indictment letter of indictment".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.

● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf

● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. An incident that assisted the Immigration Control Act violation
(extra-qualification activity).
In May 2010, a "Chinese" was arrested
for violating the Immigration Act 70-1- (4) "extra-qualification activity."
In May 2010, Company L received a "home investigation" on suspicion
of "helping" Article 70-1- (4) of the Immigration Control Act "non-qualified activity".
I was arrested on June 14, 2010.
The reason is that “we issued” “Chinese people”
with “Contents lie fake Employment contract documents” described in Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
This is Article 62 of the Penal Code "Sin to Support Other Crimes"
for the violation of Article 70-1- (4) "Actual Status of Residence" for "Chinese".
Do you understand? The "Applying Law" is "changing".

I argued.
I. Acts prescribed by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Sin to promote unlawful employment",
which is "a crime of assistance" against "unlawful employment"
of Article 70, paragraph 1 and Article 19, paragraph 1 of the Immigration Act I did not.

The police officer said, "You should admit the crime in the" general theory ".
And the police "sent" me to the "Tokyo District Public Prosecution."
I said to the prosecutor that the act of "supporting"
under the Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4), which is the "reason for crime"
of "Indictment Letter", is "not a crime".
The prosecutor said "everyone does not" credit "your" telling ".
"The lawyer" asked the prosecutor to release me.
The prosecutor "rejected" the "request" because "the trial can not be maintained".
And the prosecutor "indicted" me.

Japan is the only country that makes people criminal in the "general theory".
However, the Constitution of Japan stipulates in Article 31 that punishment can only be punished by the law enacted in the Diet.

The "reason for prosecution" and the "decision reason" were
that I issued "documents of employment contract" whose "content is false" to the Chinese,
so the Chinese were able to easily obtain "qualification of residence",
So they were able to "stay" in Japan.
Because they were able to stay in Japan, they said that they were able to "illegal working."

However, if a foreigner submits a "contract document
for employment with false content" and "acquires status of residence",
it is "cancellation of status of residence" in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act. .

The “employment contract document whose content is false” is written as “falsehood documents”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act.
"Falsehood documents" has been changed to "documents with misrepresented" in subsequent changes.

All four Chinese have not received "cancellation of status of residence"
and "administrative disposition" of "deportation" from the Minister of Justice
for having submitted "false documents".
Even if it receives it, it is an "administrative disposition" of "deportation".
Therefore, he asserted that Article 60
of the Criminal Code "Sin to support other crimes" is not applicable.

The prosecution still "does not admit" the violation of the applicable law.
We need the support of the international community.
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines, and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion July 07, 2019 Special Zone Sunday Edition: "God, give Europeans a great dream!" Dear Sirs, G20 in 2019, Europe did not feel well. European leaders should give dreams to the Europeans and the peoples of the world and create an earth of rich environment. Ganbare!

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

July 07, 2019 Special Zone Sunday Edition: "God, give Europeans a great dream!"

Dear Sirs, G20 in 2019, Europe did not feel well. European leaders should give dreams to the Europeans and the peoples of the world and create an earth of rich environment. Ganbare!

Part 1. The "Headings" dated July 1, 2019 in the UK's "Financial Times" is excellent. "G20 leaders, puzzled by the" behavior "of Ivanka Trump.

"US politics changed to Family business", "Two people stand out inside the administration".

President Donald Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Abe are very similar.

"Post" the beginning and end of a long article.

The image that will be remembered for a long time about this year's major 20 countries and regional summits (G20 Summit).

What's remembering is the video that Ilanka Trump, the daughter of President Donald Trump, breaks into the circle of world leaders in a subtle atmosphere.

The videos released by the French government are being discussed by President Emmanuel Macron of France, Prime Minister Terisa May of the United Kingdom, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada, and Managing Director of International Monetary Fund (IMF) Christine Lagarde.

When Mr. Ivanka "cuts in" there.

The leaders try to act unnaturally and politely.

It projects various "face expressions".

Mr. Lagardo was not able to hide especially "irritability".

And lastly,

President Donald Trump often treats politics as an extension of business.

The business has always been “completely grasped” firmly “in family”.

Trump's White House "looks" almost unchanged.

And Donald Trump President, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, and would be "China's Xi Jinping Jintao" and "North Korea's Kim Jong-un chairman".

What they are aiming for is "like a dictatorship of a dynasty nation".

Under these circumstances, we should engage in free production activities and free international trade in these circumstances: freedom and democracy, respect for human rights, and the natural environment that values ​​human life.

Prime Minister Abe called for "promotion of free trade" in G20.

However, at the end of the G20, Japan announced "restriction of export of! Semiconductor materials to Korea by the Japanese government".

In Japan, this is called "two tongues", "duplicity" and "double-dealing".

This may destroy Korea's semiconductor industry.

"Additional tariffs" in the United States are due to "security."

The Japanese government argued that the export restrictions were not for WTO rules but for Japan's "security".

The international community is "crazy".

I think that the international community "returns to normal" when Europe becomes healthy.

Build a "special zone" in each country in order for Europe to "become better".

“US citizens” will reject politics that have become “family business”.

I look forward to the election next year.

It will continue next week.

Part 2. We propose to build "special zones" in each country, including Europe.

Please read along with the proposal for the United States (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see.

The prosperity of each country is realized by the freedom, democracy and "ruled under the law" of the world.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please direct the concerned parties to investigate.

Materials submitted to the ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose the name and the required items.

If you have any questions please email me.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp