Opinion from Japanese Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-07-24: Chers Messieurs, Vous êtes "acte d'accusation" Si vous regardez la loi sur l'immigration, n'importe qui peut comprendre "l'erreur" de "la loi applicable".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-07-24: Chers Messieurs, Vous êtes "acte d'accusation"
Si vous regardez la loi sur l'immigration, n'importe qui peut comprendre "l'erreur" de "la loi applicable".
Si vous ne comprenez pas, vous êtes "incompétent".


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


S'il vous plaît voir "acte d'accusation" à "site" ci-dessous.
Cet incident ne fait que regarder cette "acte d'accusation",
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les fichiers PDF "Traduction anglaise" et "Original japonais".
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent sur le traitement des informations personnelles.
● Traduction en anglais "Acte d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence. Exactement, veuillez y aller seul.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte original japonais "Lettre d'acte d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Pour la traduction en anglais, veuillez consulter le "PDF" ci-dessus.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Partie 1 Pour violation de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4- (4) "annulation du statut de résidence"
S'il vous plaît, comprenez "but législatif" que la "réponse" à "la personne et son défenseur" n'est pas une "peine" mais une "décision administrative".

Le but de punir l'article 70 "emploi illégal" de la loi sur l'immigration est d'examiner le procès-verbal de la délibération de la Diète,
Le but est "d'éliminer l'immigration de main-d'œuvre simple" en tant que "politique".
Par conséquent, l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration "Péché favorisant le travail au noir" est presque "complètement exclu".
S'il n'y a personne qui emploie des étrangers qui ne sont pas éligibles pour travailler, les "travailleurs illégaux" ne se produiront jamais.

Article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration "Péché pour la promotion du travail illégal"
Il est également possible d'éliminer les débarquements illégaux tels que les gens de mer et les séjours illégaux tels que les séjours supplémentaires.
Les étrangers ne peuvent pas "rester" sans leur "revenu" et il est inutile de rester.
Il est presque impossible de l’empêcher en "forgeant" votre passeport ou votre carte d’immatriculation étrangère.

Si vous lisez attentivement la loi sur l’immigration, il s’agit à l’origine d’un décret ministériel,
Vous remarquerez que plus vous êtes intéressé, plus vous êtes détaillé.
Et il est révisé chaque année.

Le jeune procureur du nouveau venu s'empressa d '"exploiter".
L'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration est un "cas" avant de me punir
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal dans "Activités parascolaires"
Je pense qu'il n'y avait pas d '"application. Exemple".
C'est parce que d'anciens "procureurs" ont étudié "le droit de l'immigration" et que leur application était déraisonnable.

Les jeunes procureurs pensaient que ce serait "un exploit" si les "auteurs" étaient le président de "l'entreprise qui se préparait à figurer sur la liste"
Alors ils ont "mobilisé" les "médias" et m'ont transformé en criminel.
Mais le péché est lourd.
"Faux accusations" est un péché pour chaque faux document, alors
Il vivra toute sa vie en prison.

Je pense que vous pouvez comprendre que l'administration judiciaire japonaise est "pourrie".
Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes criminels» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. J'ai vu ça de mes yeux.
Si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur, les Américains ne sont pas coupables.
Le gouvernement des États-Unis devrait réclamer la restauration et une compensation pour l'honneur des Américains.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-07-24:Dear Sirs, If you look at the "bill of indictment" and the "Immigration Act", anyone can understand the "error" of "the applicable law".

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-07-24:Dear Sirs, If you look at the "bill of indictment" and the "Immigration Act",
anyone can understand the "error" of "the applicable law".
If you do not understand, you are "incompetent."

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment",
you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Part 1. Please understand the "legislative purpose"
that "response" to "the person and supporter" for violation
of Immigration Act 22-4- (4) "cancellation of status of residence" is not "punishment"
but "administrative disposition" .

The purpose of punishing Article 70 "illegal work"
of the Immigration Act is to "exclude the immigration
of simple labor" as "policy" even if you look at the minutes of the Diet deliberation.
Therefore, it is almost "completely excluded"
by Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sin promoting illegal work".
If there is no one who employs foreigners who are not eligible to work,
"illegal workers" will never occur.

Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sin to promote illegal work" can eliminate illegal landings such
as seafarers and overstays.
Foreigners can not "stay" without their "income" and there is no point in staying.
It is almost impossible to prevent it by "forging" your passport or alien registration card.

If you read the Immigration Law carefully,
you will notice that the more you are interested in,
the more detailed it is, as it is originally a ministry order.
And it is revised yearly.

The young prosecutor of the newcomer hastened "feat".
Before punishing me, I think that there were no "applications" of Article 60
and Article 62 "Sin to support other crimes" in Article 70
of the Immigration Act "Actual Activities" as an "Example".
It is because past "prosecutors" study "the immigration law"
and there was unreasonable in application.

Young prosecutors thought it would be "feat" if "offenders" be the president
of "the company preparing to be listed"
So they "mobilized" the "media" and made me a criminal.
But the sin is heavy.
Since "a lie for false accusation" is a sin for each preparation
of false documents, he will live for a lifetime in jail.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer,
the Americans are not guilty. The United States government should claim restoration
and compensation for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese To everyone in the world's media There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.

To everyone in the world's media　


There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer,
the Americans are not guilty. The United States government should claim restoration
and compensation for the honor of Americans.


2019-07-24:Dear Sirs, If you look at the "bill of indictment" and the "Immigration Act",
anyone can understand the "error" of "the applicable law".
If you do not understand, you are "incompetent."

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment",
you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Part 1. Please understand the "legislative purpose"
that "response" to "the person and supporter" for violation
of Immigration Act 22-4- (4) "cancellation of status of residence" is not "punishment"
but "administrative disposition" .

The purpose of punishing Article 70 "illegal work"
of the Immigration Act is to "exclude the immigration
of simple labor" as "policy" even if you look at the minutes of the Diet deliberation.
Therefore, it is almost "completely excluded"
by Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sin promoting illegal work".
If there is no one who employs foreigners who are not eligible to work,
"illegal workers" will never occur.

Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sin to promote illegal work" can eliminate illegal landings such
as seafarers and overstays.
Foreigners can not "stay" without their "income" and there is no point in staying.
It is almost impossible to prevent it by "forging" your passport or alien registration card.

If you read the Immigration Law carefully,
you will notice that the more you are interested in,
the more detailed it is, as it is originally a ministry order.
And it is revised yearly.

The young prosecutor of the newcomer hastened "feat".
Before punishing me, I think that there were no "applications" of Article 60
and Article 62 "Sin to support other crimes" in Article 70
of the Immigration Act "Actual Activities" as an "Example".
It is because past "prosecutors" study "the immigration law"
and there was unreasonable in application.

Young prosecutors thought it would be "feat" if "offenders" be the president
of "the company preparing to be listed"
So they "mobilized" the "media" and made me a criminal.
But the sin is heavy.
Since "a lie for false accusation" is a sin for each preparation
of false documents, he will live for a lifetime in jail.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ****

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********************

Opinion from Japanese To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-07-23:Dear Sirs, it is humorous that Japanese Prime Minister Abe says "Government under the law". I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law". Are the Philippine government and the Chinese government "Japan's subordinate countries"?

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-07-23:Dear Sirs, it is humorous that Japanese Prime Minister Abe says "Government under the law".
I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law".
Are the Philippine government and the Chinese government "Japan's subordinate countries"?

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment",
you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Part 1. In order to "correctly" the Article 73-2 "Acts promoting illegal labor" etc.
under the Immigration Act, "The Reason for Forced Deportation" etc.
has been "added to take effect" from July 1, 2010.
The following were added as new "reasons for deportation":

(A) Conducting an act of aiding or assisting
in the preparation of false alteration documents etc.
for the purpose of making other foreigners unfairly "landing permits etc."
(I) Having done "an act of promoting illegal work".
(U) Having received a "punishment" of "imprison without work" or more
for "a crime of an activity outside the qualification."

I think that "real intention"
of the Immigration Act is "understandable" even if this revision is seen.
They are different from "unlawful immigration" in the United States.
They are "formally entered" immigrants.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


******　최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁　******


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다.
그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


북한 정부는 일본 정부에 '항의'해야합니다.
"일본 정부야말로 외국인 납치 '사건을'해결 '해야한다.
"Same ethnic"이다 "남조선 인" "의"피해자 "는"수천 "있습니다.
"한반도의 인민 '을'대표 '하고 일본 정부에 항의를하십시오!
아베 정권의 약점은 「입관 법 위반 사건 "입니다.
일본이 법에 따라 통치하지 않는 증거의 '사건'입니다.

일본 정부의 '입관 법 위반 "허위을 공표합니다.
7 월 참의원 선거를 향한 이러한 것을 공표하고 일본 정부를 규탄하십시오.
아베 정권은 당황합니다.
아베 정권이 무너지면 다음 정권은 북한에 순종 생각합니다.

북한은 일본 정부가 외국인을 "불법"납치, 감금 "하고있다"고 공표해야한다.
북한은 "일본인 납치 자"보다 많은 "외국인 피해자"가 있는지 "공표"해야합니다.
북한은 세계 언론을 북한의 '아군'으로해야합니다.
북한 정부는 외국 언론이나 유엔에서 발표합니다.
북한 정부는 구체적으로 "내 이름"을 공표합니다. 승인합니다.


My information ** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***** ******************

Opinion from Japanese To President Trump 2019-07-23:Dear Sirs, it is humorous that Japanese Prime Minister Abe says "Government under the law". I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law". Are the Philippine government and the Chinese government "Japan's subordinate countries"?

To President Trump


There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.


2019-07-23:Dear Sirs, it is humorous that Japanese Prime Minister Abe says "Government under the law".
I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law".
Are the Philippine government and the Chinese government "Japan's subordinate countries"?

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment",
you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Part 1. In order to "correctly" the Article 73-2 "Acts promoting illegal labor" etc.
under the Immigration Act, "The Reason for Forced Deportation" etc.
has been "added to take effect" from July 1, 2010.
The following were added as new "reasons for deportation":

(A) Conducting an act of aiding or assisting
in the preparation of false alteration documents etc.
for the purpose of making other foreigners unfairly "landing permits etc."
(I) Having done "an act of promoting illegal work".
(U) Having received a "punishment" of "imprison without work" or more
for "a crime of an activity outside the qualification."

I think that "real intention"
of the Immigration Act is "understandable" even if this revision is seen.
They are different from "unlawful immigration" in the United States.
They are "formally entered" immigrants.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ******



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

******

Opinion from Japanese Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-07-23: Chers Messieurs, Il est amusant de dire que le Premier ministre japonais Abe a déclaré que "le gouvernement était légal". Je peux prouver avec un "acte d'accusation" et une "loi d'immigration". Le gouvernement philippin et le gouvernement chinois sont-ils des "pays subordonnés du Japon"?

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-07-23: Chers Messieurs, Il est amusant de dire que le Premier ministre japonais Abe a déclaré que "le gouvernement était légal".
Je peux prouver avec un "acte d'accusation" et une "loi d'immigration".
Le gouvernement philippin et le gouvernement chinois sont-ils des "pays subordonnés du Japon"?


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


S'il vous plaît voir "acte d'accusation" à "site" ci-dessous.
Cet incident ne fait que regarder cette "acte d'accusation",
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les fichiers PDF "Traduction anglaise" et "Original japonais".
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent sur le traitement des informations personnelles.
● Traduction en anglais "Acte d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence. Exactement, veuillez y aller seul.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte original japonais "Lettre d'acte d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Pour la traduction en anglais, veuillez consulter le "PDF" ci-dessus.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Partie 1 "Propre" à l'article 73-2 "Loi sur le travail illégal", etc. de la loi sur l'immigration
Pour "correspondance", "motif d'expulsion", etc. était "exécution additionnelle" à compter du 1er juillet 2010.
Les éléments suivants ont été ajoutés en tant que nouveaux "motifs d'expulsion":

(A) dans le but d'inciter d'autres étrangers à donner injustement "une autorisation d'atterrissage, etc."
Avoir aidé ou aidé à la création de documents faussement modifiés, etc.
I) avoir "commis un acte de promotion du travail illégal".
(U) Avoir reçu une "peine" d '"emprisonnement sans travail" ou plus pour "un crime d'une activité en dehors de la qualification".

Je pense que la "véritable intention" de la loi sur l'immigration est "compréhensible" même si cette révision est vue.
Ils sont différents de "l'immigration illégale" aux États-Unis.
Ce sont des immigrants "officiellement entrés".

Je pense que vous pouvez comprendre que l'administration judiciaire japonaise est "pourrie".
Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme.
Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes criminels» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".

Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. J'ai vu ça de mes yeux.
Si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur, les Américains ne sont pas coupables.
Le gouvernement des États-Unis devrait réclamer la restauration et une compensation pour l'honneur des Américains.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-07-23: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, es ist lustig zu sagen, dass der japanische Premierminister Abe "Regierung unter dem Gesetz" sagt. Ich kann mit "Anklageschrift" und "Einwanderungsgesetz" nachweisen. Sind die philippinische Regierung und die chinesische Regierung "untergeordnete Länder Japans"?

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten

2019-07-23: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, es ist lustig zu sagen, dass der japanische Premierminister Abe "Regierung unter dem Gesetz" sagt.
Ich kann mit "Anklageschrift" und "Einwanderungsgesetz" nachweisen.
Sind die philippinische Regierung und die chinesische Regierung "untergeordnete Länder Japans"?


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Bitte beachten Sie "Anklageschrift" auf "Website" unten.
Dieser Vorfall befasst sich nur mit dieser "Anklageschrift",
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte beachten Sie die PDF-Dateien "Englische Übersetzung" und "Japanisches Original".
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung ins Englische "Anklageschreiben"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient als Referenz. Genau, bitte gehen Sie alleine.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext "Verfahrensschreiben Anklageschreiben"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie im obigen "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Teil 1. "Richtig" zu Artikel 73-2 "Gesetz zur Förderung illegaler Arbeit" usw. des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Für "Korrespondenz", "Abschiebungsgrund" usw. war "zusätzliche Vollstreckung" ab dem 1. Juli 2010.
Als neue "Gründe für die Abschiebung" wurden hinzugefügt:

(A) Um andere Ausländer dazu zu bringen, zu Unrecht "Landeerlaubnis usw." zu erteilen
Bei der Erstellung von fälschlicherweise geänderten Dokumenten usw. behilflich sein oder helfen.
(I) "eine Handlung zur Förderung der illegalen Arbeit" getan zu haben.
(U) eine "Strafe" für "Inhaftierung ohne Arbeit" oder mehr für "ein Verbrechen einer Tätigkeit außerhalb der Qualifikation" erhalten zu haben.

Ich denke, dass die "wahre Absicht" des Einwanderungsgesetzes "verständlich" ist, auch wenn diese Überarbeitung zu sehen ist.
Sie unterscheiden sich von der "illegalen Einwanderung" in den Vereinigten Staaten.
Sie sind "offiziell eingereiste" Einwanderer.

Ich denke, Sie können verstehen, dass Japans Justizverwaltung "faul" ist.
Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln.
Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu bestrafen.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe das mit meinen Augen gesehen.
Wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt, sind die Amerikaner nicht schuldig.
Die Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung für die Ehre der Amerikaner fordern.
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-07-23:Dear Sirs, it is humorous that Japanese Prime Minister Abe says "Government under the law". I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law". Are the Philippine government and the Chinese government "Japan's subordinate countries"?

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-07-23:Dear Sirs, it is humorous that Japanese Prime Minister Abe says "Government under the law".
I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law".
Are the Philippine government and the Chinese government "Japan's subordinate countries"?

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment",
you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Part 1. In order to "correctly" the Article 73-2 "Acts promoting illegal labor" etc.
under the Immigration Act, "The Reason for Forced Deportation" etc.
has been "added to take effect" from July 1, 2010.
The following were added as new "reasons for deportation":

(A) Conducting an act of aiding or assisting
in the preparation of false alteration documents etc.
for the purpose of making other foreigners unfairly "landing permits etc."
(I) Having done "an act of promoting illegal work".
(U) Having received a "punishment" of "imprison without work" or more
for "a crime of an activity outside the qualification."

I think that "real intention"
of the Immigration Act is "understandable" even if this revision is seen.
They are different from "unlawful immigration" in the United States.
They are "formally entered" immigrants.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese Opinion from Japanese 2019-07-23:Dear Sirs, it is humorous that Japanese Prime Minister Abe says "Government under the law".

To everyone in the world's media　


There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.


2019-07-23:Dear Sirs, it is humorous that Japanese Prime Minister Abe says "Government under the law".
I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law".
Are the Philippine government and the Chinese government "Japan's subordinate countries"?

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment",
you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

Part 1. In order to "correctly" the Article 73-2 "Acts promoting illegal labor" etc.
under the Immigration Act, "The Reason for Forced Deportation" etc.
has been "added to take effect" from July 1, 2010.
The following were added as new "reasons for deportation":

(A) Conducting an act of aiding or assisting
in the preparation of false alteration documents etc.
for the purpose of making other foreigners unfairly "landing permits etc."
(I) Having done "an act of promoting illegal work".
(U) Having received a "punishment" of "imprison without work" or more
for "a crime of an activity outside the qualification."

I think that "real intention"
of the Immigration Act is "understandable" even if this revision is seen.
They are different from "unlawful immigration" in the United States.
They are "formally entered" immigrants.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are "causal relationships"
of unlawful labor with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ****

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese Opinion from Japanese

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-07-22:Dear Sirs, The Japanese Government still does not admit crimes.
I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law".
Please watch. Are the Philippine and Chinese governments "independent countries"?


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment", you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. The “bill of indictment” first describes the facts of Article 70
“Unqualified Activities” of the Immigration Act of “Chinese”.
And then, the reason for the crime in "bill of indictment" is the fact
that it has supported the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4).
And finally,
it describes the fact that "Chinese" violated the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4)
"Submission of False Documents".

Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents" is as follows.
If the Minister of Justice submits "False Documents"
and obtains "Certificate of Residence",
it stipulates that "Certificate of Residence" will be cancelled.
And it is "administrative punishment" of "forcible deportation" as "punished"
of "cancellation of status of residence" is received.
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code can not apply to the Immigration Act 22-4- (4)
"Revocation of Status of Residence".

This case is against the Immigration Act.
The application of the law is the order of the constitution, the treaty,
the special law, and the general law.
It is ignorant, incompetent, and unsightly to "falsify" the level
of law that even amateurs around the world can understand.

If there is no "prescription" of "submission of false documents (incorrect documents)"
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act,
Article 60 of the Criminal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
"Ineligible Activities" It may have been possible to "apply" Article 62 "Sins to support
other crimes of the Penal Code".
However, the following "application" is "malicious" as a "law expert".
1) Disregard the law of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) "Revocation of Status of Residence".
2) and apply priority to Article 60
and Article 62 of the Criminal Code "Sins supporting other crimes".

In addition, in violation of this Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4)
(submission of false documents),
it is not possible to punish them under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
under "Sins supporting other crimes".

So, the following (A) is "implemented" on July 1, 2010 just before doing "indictment".
Therefore, this is a "conscious" "crime".

In the case of "Kin Gungaku", because you are a foreigner, you are eligible for (A).
However, because the criminal act is "before the enforcement of the law",
it is not subject to punishment according to Article 39 of the Constitution.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


******　최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁　******


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한 말은 "모든"믿을 수 없다.
그래서 "일본인 납북자 '를'일본에 돌려 보내야한다"고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 다음에서 "더듬"하십시오.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


북한 정부는 일본 정부에 '항의'해야합니다.
"일본 정부야말로 외국인 납치 '사건을'해결 '해야한다.
"Same ethnic"이다 "남조선 인" "의"피해자 "는"수천 "있습니다.
"한반도의 인민 '을'대표 '하고 일본 정부에 항의를하십시오!
아베 정권의 약점은 「입관 법 위반 사건 "입니다.
일본이 법에 따라 통치하지 않는 증거의 '사건'입니다.

일본 정부의 '입관 법 위반 "허위을 공표합니다.
7 월 참의원 선거를 향한 이러한 것을 공표하고 일본 정부를 규탄하십시오.
아베 정권은 당황합니다.
아베 정권이 무너지면 다음 정권은 북한에 순종 생각합니다.

북한은 일본 정부가 외국인을 "불법"납치, 감금 "하고있다"고 공표해야한다.
북한은 "일본인 납치 자"보다 많은 "외국인 피해자"가 있는지 "공표"해야합니다.
북한은 세계 언론을 북한의 '아군'으로해야합니다.
북한 정부는 외국 언론이나 유엔에서 발표합니다.
북한 정부는 구체적으로 "내 이름"을 공표합니다. 승인합니다.


My information ** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***** ******************

Opinion from Japanese To President Trump There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes. If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty. The United States government should claim restoration and compensation for the honor of Americans.

To President Trump


There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration
and compensation for the honor of Americans.


2019-07-22:Dear Sirs, The Japanese Government still does not admit crimes.
I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law".
Please watch. Are the Philippine and Chinese governments "independent countries"?


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment", you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. The “bill of indictment” first describes the facts of Article 70
“Unqualified Activities” of the Immigration Act of “Chinese”.
And then, the reason for the crime in "bill of indictment" is the fact
that it has supported the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4).
And finally,
it describes the fact that "Chinese" violated the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4)
"Submission of False Documents".

Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents" is as follows.
If the Minister of Justice submits "False Documents"
and obtains "Certificate of Residence",
it stipulates that "Certificate of Residence" will be cancelled.
And it is "administrative punishment" of "forcible deportation" as "punished"
of "cancellation of status of residence" is received.
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code can not apply to the Immigration Act 22-4- (4)
"Revocation of Status of Residence".

This case is against the Immigration Act.
The application of the law is the order of the constitution, the treaty,
the special law, and the general law.
It is ignorant, incompetent, and unsightly to "falsify" the level
of law that even amateurs around the world can understand.

If there is no "prescription" of "submission of false documents (incorrect documents)"
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act,
Article 60 of the Criminal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
"Ineligible Activities" It may have been possible to "apply" Article 62 "Sins to support
other crimes of the Penal Code".
However, the following "application" is "malicious" as a "law expert".
1) Disregard the law of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) "Revocation of Status of Residence".
2) and apply priority to Article 60
and Article 62 of the Criminal Code "Sins supporting other crimes".

In addition, in violation of this Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4)
(submission of false documents),
it is not possible to punish them under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
under "Sins supporting other crimes".

So, the following (A) is "implemented" on July 1, 2010 just before doing "indictment".
Therefore, this is a "conscious" "crime".

In the case of "Kin Gungaku", because you are a foreigner, you are eligible for (A).
However, because the criminal act is "before the enforcement of the law",
it is not subject to punishment according to Article 39 of the Constitution.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

My information ******



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

******

Opinion from Japanese Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-07-22: Chers Messieurs, le gouvernement japonais n'admet toujours pas les crimes. Je peux prouver avec un "acte d'accusation" et une "loi d'immigration". S'il vous plaît jeter un oeil. Les gouvernements philippin et chinois sont-ils des "pays indépendants"?

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-07-22: Chers Messieurs, le gouvernement japonais n'admet toujours pas les crimes.
Je peux prouver avec un "acte d'accusation" et une "loi d'immigration". S'il vous plaît jeter un oeil.
Les gouvernements philippin et chinois sont-ils des "pays indépendants"?


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


S'il vous plaît voir "acte d'accusation" à "site" ci-dessous.
Si vous regardez cette affaire "acte d'accusation", vous pouvez comprendre "erreur de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les fichiers PDF "Traduction anglaise" et "Original japonais".
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent sur le traitement des informations personnelles.
● Traduction en anglais "Acte d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence. Exactement, veuillez y aller seul.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte original japonais "Lettre d'acte d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Pour la traduction en anglais, veuillez consulter le "PDF" ci-dessus.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Partie 1 Tout d'abord dans l'acte d'accusation
L'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration du "chinois" décrit les faits relatifs aux "activités non qualifiées".
Et puis, la raison du crime dans l'acte d'accusation est le fait qu'il a appuyé l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.
Enfin, il décrit le fait que les "Chinois" ont violé l’article 22-4- (4) de la Loi sur l’immigration, intitulé «Présentation de faux documents».

L'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration "Présentation de faux documents" est le suivant.
Si le ministre de la Justice soumet de "faux documents" et a obtenu le "droit de résidence"
Il stipule que "le statut de résidence" sera annulé.
Et c'est "punition administrative" de "déportation forcée" comme "punie" de "radiation du statut de résidence" est reçue.
À l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration "suppression du statut de résidence",
Les articles 60 et 62 du code pénal ne peuvent pas s'appliquer.


Cette affaire est contre la loi sur l'immigration.
L'application de la loi est l'ordre de la constitution, du traité, de la loi spéciale et de la loi générale.
Il est ignorant, incompétent et inesthétique de "falsifier" le niveau de droit que même les amateurs du monde entier peuvent comprendre.

S'il n'y a pas de "prescription" de "soumettre de faux documents (documents incorrects)" à l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration,
Article 70 et article 62 du Code pénal pour l'article 70 "Activités exemptées" en vertu de la loi sur l'immigration
L '"application" de "un crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes de droit pénal" aurait pu être possible.
Cependant, "l'application" suivante est "malveillante" en tant qu '"expert en droit".
1) Ne pas respecter la loi de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4- (4) "Révocation du statut de résidence".
2) et appliquer en priorité les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal "Péchés commis au soutien d'autres crimes".

En outre, contre la violation de l’article 22-4- 4) de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration (présentation de faux documents),
Ne peut être puni par les articles 60 et 62, du code pénal, "Les péchés au soutien d'autres crimes".

Ainsi, le (A) suivant est "mis en œuvre" le 1er juillet 2010 juste avant de procéder à "l'acte d'accusation".
C'est donc un "crime" "conscient".

Dans le cas de "Kin Gungaku", étant donné que vous êtes un étranger, vous êtes admissible à (A).
Toutefois, étant donné que l'acte criminel est "avant l'application de la loi", il n'est pas passible de sanction en vertu de l'article 39 de la Constitution.

Je pense que vous pouvez comprendre que l'administration judiciaire japonaise est "pourrie".
Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes criminels» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Il est "fou" d '"appliquer" les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal "Des péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes" contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".
Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. J'ai vu ça de mes yeux.
Si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur, les Américains ne sont pas coupables.
Le gouvernement des États-Unis devrait réclamer la restauration et une compensation pour l'honneur des Américains.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-07-22: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die japanische Regierung gibt Verbrechen immer noch nicht zu. Ich kann mit "Anklageschrift" und "Einwanderungsgesetz" nachweisen. Bitte werfen Sie einen Blick darauf. Sind die philippinische und die chinesische Regierung "unabhängige Länder"?

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-07-22: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die japanische Regierung gibt Verbrechen immer noch nicht zu.
Ich kann mit "Anklageschrift" und "Einwanderungsgesetz" nachweisen. Bitte werfen Sie einen Blick darauf.
Sind die philippinische und die chinesische Regierung "unabhängige Länder"?


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Bitte beachten Sie "Anklageschrift" auf "Website" unten.
Wenn Sie sich diesen Fall "Anklageschrift" ansehen, können Sie "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte beachten Sie die PDF-Dateien "Englische Übersetzung" und "Japanisches Original".
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung ins Englische "Anklageschreiben"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient als Referenz. Genau, bitte gehen Sie alleine.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext "Verfahrensschreiben Anklageschreiben"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie im obigen "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Teil 1. Zunächst in der "Anklageschrift"
Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes von "Chinese" beschreibt den Sachverhalt von "nicht qualifizierten Tätigkeiten".
Und der Grund für das Verbrechen in der "Anklageschrift" ist die Tatsache, dass es den Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes unterstützt hat.
Und schließlich beschreibt es die Tatsache, dass "Chinesen" gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4- (4) "Einreichung falscher Dokumente" verstoßen.

Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Vorlage falscher Dokumente" lautet wie folgt.
Wenn der Justizminister "falsche Dokumente" vorlegt und "Aufenthaltsberechtigung" erhalten hat
Es sieht vor, dass "der Aufenthaltsstatus" aufgehoben wird.
Und es ist "administrative Bestrafung" von "Abschiebung" als "bestraft" von "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" erhalten.
In Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches können nicht angewendet werden.


Dieser Fall ist gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz.
Die Anwendung des Gesetzes erfolgt nach Maßgabe der Verfassung, des Konvents, des Sondergesetzes und des Allgemeinen Gesetzes.
Es ist unwissend, inkompetent und unansehnlich, die Ebene der Gesetze zu "verfälschen", die selbst Amateure auf der ganzen Welt verstehen können.

Wenn es in Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes keine "Vorschrift" für "falsche Dokumente einreichen (falsche Dokumente)" gibt,
Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs für den Artikel 70 "Ausnahmeregelungen" nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz
Die "Anwendung" eines Verbrechens zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten des Strafrechts "wäre möglich gewesen.
Die folgende "Anwendung" ist jedoch als "Rechtsexperte" "böswillig".
1) Missachtung des Gesetzes zur Einwanderungskontrolle 22-4- (4) "Widerruf des Aufenthaltsstatus".
2) und vorrangig auf Artikel 60 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuches "Sünden, die andere Straftaten unterstützen" anwenden.

Gegen den Verstoß gegen Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes (Vorlage falscher Dokumente)
Kann nicht durch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62, "Sünden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützen" nach dem Strafgesetzbuch bestraft werden.

Das Folgende (A) wird also am 1. Juli 2010 "implementiert", kurz bevor "Anklage" erhoben wird.
Daher ist dies ein "bewusstes" "Verbrechen".

Im Falle von "Kin Gungaku" haben Sie Anspruch auf (A), da Sie Ausländer sind.
Da die strafbare Handlung jedoch "vor der Durchsetzung des Gesetzes" liegt, ist sie gemäß Artikel 39 der Verfassung nicht strafbar.

Ich denke, Sie können verstehen, dass Japans Justizverwaltung "faul" ist.
Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu bestrafen.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Es ist "verrückt", die Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches "Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "anzuwenden".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".
Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe das mit meinen Augen gesehen.
Wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt, sind die Amerikaner nicht schuldig.
Die Regierung der Vereinigten Staaten sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung für die Ehre der Amerikaner fordern.
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-07-22:Dear Sirs, The Japanese Government still does not admit crimes. I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law". Please watch. Are the Philippine and Chinese governments "independent countries"?

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-07-22:Dear Sirs, The Japanese Government still does not admit crimes.
I can prove with "bill of indictment" and "immigration law".
Please watch. Are the Philippine and Chinese governments "independent countries"?


You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Please see "bill of indictment" at "site" below.
If you look at this case "bill of indictment", you can understand "error of applicable law".

Please see the "English translation" and "Japanese original" PDF.
Please be careful about the handling of personal information.
● Translation into English "Indictment letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference. Exactly, please go by yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanese original text "Proceeding letter letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. For English translation, please see the above "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf


Part 1. The “bill of indictment” first describes the facts of Article 70
“Unqualified Activities” of the Immigration Act of “Chinese”.
And then, the reason for the crime in "bill of indictment" is the fact
that it has supported the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4).
And finally,
it describes the fact that "Chinese" violated the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4)
"Submission of False Documents".

Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Act "Submission of false documents" is as follows.
If the Minister of Justice submits "False Documents"
and obtains "Certificate of Residence",
it stipulates that "Certificate of Residence" will be cancelled.
And it is "administrative punishment" of "forcible deportation" as "punished"
of "cancellation of status of residence" is received.
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code can not apply to the Immigration Act 22-4- (4)
"Revocation of Status of Residence".

This case is against the Immigration Act.
The application of the law is the order of the constitution, the treaty,
the special law, and the general law.
It is ignorant, incompetent, and unsightly to "falsify" the level
of law that even amateurs around the world can understand.

If there is no "prescription" of "submission of false documents (incorrect documents)"
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act,
Article 60 of the Criminal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
"Ineligible Activities" It may have been possible to "apply" Article 62 "Sins to support
other crimes of the Penal Code".
However, the following "application" is "malicious" as a "law expert".
1) Disregard the law of Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4) "Revocation of Status of Residence".
2) and apply priority to Article 60
and Article 62 of the Criminal Code "Sins supporting other crimes".

In addition, in violation of this Immigration Control Act 22-4- (4)
(submission of false documents),
it is not possible to punish them under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
under "Sins supporting other crimes".

So, the following (A) is "implemented" on July 1, 2010 just before doing "indictment".
Therefore, this is a "conscious" "crime".

In the case of "Kin Gungaku", because you are a foreigner, you are eligible for (A).
However, because the criminal act is "before the enforcement of the law",
it is not subject to punishment according to Article 39 of the Constitution.

I think you can understand that Japan's judicial administration is "rotten".
I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp