Opinion from Japanese To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-08-20: Dear Sir,History is back in 1945.In this era, “UN organizations” are useless.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-08-20: Dear Sir,
Korea does not follow the treaty with Japan.
The Japanese government, which was angry about this, excluded Korea from the “White List”.
The relations between Japan and Korea are progressing to “breaking diplomatic relations”.
History is back in 1945.In this era, “UN organizations” are useless.


Part 1. The article doesn't say that "landscaping companies and managers" were "punished".
Perhaps you did not "punish" the offender with "extremely close relationship," as usual.
It is international to "punish" only Philippine people who have done "illegal labor"
without "punishing" "landscaping companies and managers"
who illegally hired "Philippines who are not eligible to work"
in violation of the Immigration Act It is against the law.

Immigration Law Article 73-2 “Sin which promotes illegal employment” is the same logic
as “Prostitution Prevention Law”.
“Illegal labor” is not possible without a person who employs “illegal workers”.

Immigration Law Article 73-2 “Punish to Promote Unlawful Employment” is “from the past”.
However, it was revised in July 2010.
"I don't allow excuses that employers didn't know this law" was implemented.
However, the “employer” is often not “punished”
by the “adhesion relationship” between the “police” and the “employer”.

The support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be "criminal"
as "reason for crime"
Applying the “Sin of Support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is a “breach of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-08-20: Dear Sir, Korea does not follow the treaty with Japan. The Japanese government, which was angry about this, excluded Korea from the “White List”.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-08-20: Dear Sir,
Korea does not follow the treaty with Japan.
The Japanese government, which was angry about this, excluded Korea from the “White List”.
The relations between Japan and Korea are progressing to “breaking diplomatic relations”.
History is back in 1945.In this era, “UN organizations” are useless.


Part 1. The article doesn't say that "landscaping companies and managers" were "punished".
Perhaps you did not "punish" the offender with "extremely close relationship," as usual.
It is international to "punish" only Philippine people who have done "illegal labor"
without "punishing" "landscaping companies and managers"
who illegally hired "Philippines who are not eligible to work"
in violation of the Immigration Act It is against the law.

Immigration Law Article 73-2 “Sin which promotes illegal employment” is the same logic
as “Prostitution Prevention Law”.
“Illegal labor” is not possible without a person who employs “illegal workers”.

Immigration Law Article 73-2 “Punish to Promote Unlawful Employment” is “from the past”.
However, it was revised in July 2010.
"I don't allow excuses that employers didn't know this law" was implemented.
However, the “employer” is often not “punished”
by the “adhesion relationship” between the “police” and the “employer”.

The support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be "criminal"
as "reason for crime"
Applying the “Sin of Support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is a “breach of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand,
the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ****

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********************

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。 2019-08-19：尊敬的先生， 我对日本“饮食会员”的无能感到惊讶。他们不理解“宪法”第31条。 “饮食成员”制定了法律。 “饮食成员”应对“法律”负有“责任”。 这是“饮食成员”的权利和义务。 “饮食成员”似乎只是“政治家”，他们只坚持“他们的权利”。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。


2019-08-19：尊敬的先生，
我对日本“饮食会员”的无能感到惊讶。他们不理解“宪法”第31条。
“饮食成员”制定了法律。 “饮食成员”应对“法律”负有“责任”。
这是“饮食成员”的权利和义务。
“饮食成员”似乎只是“政治家”，他们只坚持“他们的权利”。


第1部分。违反移民法第70条“不合格活动”
“非法劳工”的“协助和教唆罪”是移民法第73-2条
“促进非法就业的罪”。
第73-2条（1）属于下列任何一项的人将受到处罚
监禁不超过3年或罚款不超过300万日元，
或将被累计判处监禁和罚款：
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=


园林绿化公司和负责雇用没有资格工作的外国人的人员将被处置。
对三个人的惩罚是不公平的。
在这种情况下，雇用他们的“园林绿化公司和负责人”没有受到“入境管制法”第73-2条的“惩罚”。
他们对“法律面前人人平等”和“国际法”是“无辜的”。

“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“支持”是“犯罪理由”
“支持者”不能成为“罪犯”
它是（撤销居住地）。

第22-4（1）条对于在附表I或附表II的左栏中列出的居住地位的日本居住的外国公民，发现下列任何事实（除了被认可为根据第61-2条第（1）款规定的难民，司法部长可根据司法部命令规定的程序撤销外国国民的居住地位：
（iv）超出前三项所列案件的规定，通过提交或提交含有虚假记录的文件（包括根据第7-2条规定的证书，第（1）款，通过提交或提交包含为护照获得的虚假记录或签证的文件或图纸通过提交或提交包含虚假记录的文件或图纸而获得的，或者包含虚假记录的图纸，着陆验证印章;

“刑法”第60条和第62条违反“移民管制法”第70条
申请“犯罪”是“有意识的”“违反适用法律”。
换句话说，“虚假收费”。
检察官仍然不理解这种逻辑。

你可以理解日本移民局处于“腐败状态”。
我问大家。
请介绍一位国际法学家，他可以向日本政府解释这项法律的逻辑。
继续下周。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只看这个“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）“移民控制和难民认可法”
“移民控制和难民认可法”
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法典
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“依法治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决它。
但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持第22-4-4条移民法”
“刑法”第60条和第62条，反对“入境管制法”第70条
“应用”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
执行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与“移民法”第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
世界上有许多受害者。


最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


请问最高领导人金正恩，*****************************************


日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。
这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”提出了关于DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该根据“自然”问题予以驳斥。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应该绑架外国人”应该“解决”。
有很多“同族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表“朝鲜半岛人民”抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“案例”。

请公布日本政府“移民法”的失实陈述。
请宣布这些事情并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”有更多“外国受害者”而不是“日本绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应该在外国媒体和联合国公布。
朝鲜政府应该特别披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的资料************************************

To President Trump 2019-08-19:Dear Sir,They don't understand Article 31 of the Constitution. "Diet member" makes the law. "Diet member" should have "responsibility" for "law". This is the right and obligation of "Diet member". "Diet member" seems to be only "politicians" who insist only on their rights.

To President Trump


2019-08-19:Dear Sir,
I'm amazed by the incompetence of the Japanese "Diet member"
They don't understand Article 31 of the Constitution. "Diet member" makes the law.
"Diet member" should have "responsibility" for "law".
This is the right and obligation of "Diet member".
"Diet member" seems to be only "politicians" who insist only on their rights.


Part 1. “Crime of aiding and abetting” for “illegal labor”
by Article 70 “Unqualified Activities” in violation
of the Immigration Act is Article 73-2 “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.
Article 73-2 (1) A person falling under any of the following items is to be punished
with imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine not exceeding 3 million yen,
or is to be subject to the cumulative imposition of imprisonment and a fine:
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=


The landscaping company and the person responsible for hiring foreigners
who are not eligible to work are subject to disposal.
The punishment for three people is unfair.
In this case, the “landscaping companies and managers”
who employed them are not “punished” under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
so they are “innocent” by “equality under the law” and “international law”.

And "support" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be used as "reason
for crime" and "supporter" cannot be "criminal"
It is (Revocation of Status of Residence).

Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to a Foreign National residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
 (except for those recognized as Refugees as set forth in Article 61-2, paragraph (1)),
 the Minister of Justice may revoke the Foreign National's status of residence
 in accordance with the procedures provided for by Ministry of Justice Order:
(iv) beyond what is provided for in the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the Foreign National has been granted, by submitting
or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including a certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry
or a visa obtained for the Passport by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry), or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing;


Applying the “sin of support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code for violations
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act is a “conscious” “violation of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ******



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

******

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-08-19: Monsieur, Je suis émerveillé par l'incompétence du "membre de la Diète" japonais Ils ne comprennent pas l'article 31 de la Constitution.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-08-19: Monsieur,
Je suis émerveillé par l'incompétence du "membre de la Diète" japonais Ils ne comprennent pas l'article 31 de la Constitution.
"Membre de la diète" fait la loi. "Un membre de la Diète" devrait avoir "la responsabilité" de la "loi".
C'est le droit et l'obligation du "membre de la Diète".
"Membre de la Diète" semble être uniquement "des politiciens" qui insistent uniquement sur "leurs droits".


Partie 1 Violation du droit de l'immigration, article 70 «Activités non qualifiées»
Le "crime de complicité" pour "travail illégal" est la loi sur l'immigration, article 73-2
“Un péché qui favorise l'emploi illégal”.
Article 73-2 (1) Une personne relevant de l'un des éléments suivants est punie
avec un emprisonnement maximal de 3 ans ou une amende maximale de 3 millions de yens,
ou doit être soumis à l'imposition cumulative d'une peine d'emprisonnement et d'une amende:
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=


L'entreprise d'aménagement paysager et la personne responsable de l'embauche d'étrangers qui ne sont pas autorisés à travailler sont sujettes à l'élimination.
La punition pour trois personnes est injuste.
En l'espèce, «l'entreprise d'aménagement paysager et la personne responsable» qui les avait embauchés n'était pas «punie» par l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Ils sont "innocents" par "égalité devant la loi" et "droit international".

Et le «soutien» à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration en tant que «motif du crime»
Les "supporters" ne peuvent pas être des "criminels"
C'est (révocation du statut de résidence).

Article 22-4 (1) Lorsque l'un des faits suivants est constaté à l'égard d'un ressortissant étranger résidant au Japon et classé dans la colonne de gauche du tableau annexé I ou du tableau II annexé (à l'exception de ceux reconnus comme Réfugiés au sens de l'article 61-2, paragraphe 1), le ministre de la Justice peut révoquer le statut de résident de l'étranger en suivant les procédures prévues par le ministère de la Justice.
(iv) au-delà de ce qui est prévu dans les cas énumérés aux trois points précédents, l'étranger a été autorisé, en présentant ou en présentant un document contenant une fausse entrée (y compris un certificat en vertu des dispositions de l'article 7-2, l’alinéa 1), obtenu en soumettant ou en présentant un document ou un dessin contenant une fausse entrée ou un visa obtenu pour le passeport en soumettant ou en présentant un document ou un dessin contenant une fausse entrée), ou un dessin contenant une fausse entrée, un sceau de vérification pour l'atterrissage;

Articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal pour violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
Appliquer un "coupable de soutien" est un "conscient" "enfreignant la loi applicable".
En d'autres termes, "Faux accusations".
Les procureurs ne comprennent toujours pas cette logique.

Vous pouvez comprendre que l'administration de l'immigration japonaise est dans un «état pourri».
Je demande à tout le monde.
Veuillez présenter un juriste international qui peut expliquer la logique de cette loi au gouvernement japonais.
Continuez jusqu'à la semaine prochaine.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.
Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.


Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-08-19: Sehr geehrter Herr, Ich bin erstaunt über die Inkompetenz des "Diätmitglieds" in Japan. Sie verstehen Artikel 31 der Verfassung nicht.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-08-19: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Ich bin erstaunt über die Inkompetenz des "Diätmitglieds" in Japan. Sie verstehen Artikel 31 der Verfassung nicht.
"Diätmitglied" macht das Gesetz. "Diät-Mitglied" sollte "Verantwortung" für "Recht" haben.
Dies ist das Recht und die Verpflichtung des "Diätmitglieds".
"Diätmitglied" scheinen nur "Politiker" zu sein, die nur auf "ihren Rechten" bestehen.


Teil 1. Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung Artikel 70 „Unqualifizierte Tätigkeiten“
"Verbrechen der Beihilfe" für "illegale Arbeit" ist das Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2
"Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert".
Artikel 73-2 (1) Eine Person, die unter einen der folgenden Punkte fällt, ist zu bestrafen
mit einer Freiheitsstrafe von nicht mehr als 3 Jahren oder einer Geldstrafe von nicht mehr als 3 Millionen Yen,
oder unterliegt der kumulativen Verhängung einer Freiheitsstrafe und einer Geldstrafe:
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=


Der Landschaftsarchitekt und die Person, die für die Einstellung von Ausländern zuständig ist, die nicht arbeitsberechtigt sind, müssen entsorgt werden.
Die Strafe für drei Personen ist ungerecht.
In diesem Fall wurde die „Landschaftsgestaltungsfirma und verantwortliche Person“, die sie eingestellt hatte, nicht durch Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes „bestraft“.
Sie sind "unschuldig" durch "Gleichheit vor dem Gesetz" und "internationales Recht".

Und die "Unterstützung" in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes als "Grund für die Kriminalität"
"Unterstützer" können keine "Verbrecher" sein
Es ist (Widerruf des Aufenthaltsstatus).

Artikel 22-4 (1) Wenn einer der folgenden Umstände in Bezug auf einen in Japan wohnhaften Ausländer festgestellt wird, dessen Aufenthaltsstatus in der linken Spalte der angehängten Tabelle I oder der angehängten Tabelle II aufgeführt ist (mit Ausnahme derjenigen, die als anerkannt sind) Flüchtlinge im Sinne von Artikel 61-2 Absatz 1 kann der Justizminister den Aufenthaltsstatus des Ausländers gemäß den in der Verordnung des Justizministeriums vorgesehenen Verfahren widerrufen:
(iv) über die in den in den vorstehenden drei Punkten aufgeführten Fällen vorgesehenen Vorkehrungen hinaus wurde dem Ausländer durch Vorlage oder Vorlage eines Dokuments, das eine falsche Eingabe enthält (einschließlich einer Bescheinigung gemäß Artikel 7-2), eine Erlaubnis erteilt, Absatz (1), erhalten durch Einreichen oder Vorlegen eines Dokuments oder einer Zeichnung, die eine falsche Eingabe enthält, oder eines Visums, das für den Pass erhalten wurde, durch Einreichen oder Vorlegen eines Dokuments oder einer Zeichnung, die eine falsche Eingabe enthält, oder einer Zeichnung, die eine falsche Eingabe enthält, ein Prüfsiegel für die Landung;

Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs für Verstöße gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Das Anwenden eines "Schuldbewusstseins" ist ein "bewusster" "Verstoß gegen geltendes Recht".
Mit anderen Worten, "Falsche Gebühren".
Die Staatsanwälte verstehen diese Logik immer noch nicht.

Sie können verstehen, dass sich die japanische Einwanderungsbehörde in einem „faulen Zustand“ befindet.
Ich frage alle.
Bitte stellen Sie einen internationalen Juristen vor, der der japanischen Regierung die Logik dieses Gesetzes erklären kann.
Weiter zur nächsten Woche.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.
Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.


Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-08-19:Dear Sir,"Diet member" should have "responsibility" for "law". This is the right and obligation of "Diet member". "Diet member" seems to be only "politicians" who insist only on their rights.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-08-19:Dear Sir,
I'm amazed by the incompetence of the Japanese "Diet member"
They don't understand Article 31 of the Constitution. "Diet member" makes the law.
"Diet member" should have "responsibility" for "law".
This is the right and obligation of "Diet member".
"Diet member" seems to be only "politicians" who insist only on their rights.


Part 1. “Crime of aiding and abetting” for “illegal labor”
by Article 70 “Unqualified Activities” in violation
of the Immigration Act is Article 73-2 “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.
Article 73-2 (1) A person falling under any of the following items is to be punished
with imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine not exceeding 3 million yen,
or is to be subject to the cumulative imposition of imprisonment and a fine:
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=


The landscaping company and the person responsible for hiring foreigners
who are not eligible to work are subject to disposal.
The punishment for three people is unfair.
In this case, the “landscaping companies and managers”
who employed them are not “punished” under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
so they are “innocent” by “equality under the law” and “international law”.

And "support" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be used as "reason
for crime" and "supporter" cannot be "criminal"
It is (Revocation of Status of Residence).

Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to a Foreign National residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
 (except for those recognized as Refugees as set forth in Article 61-2, paragraph (1)),
 the Minister of Justice may revoke the Foreign National's status of residence
 in accordance with the procedures provided for by Ministry of Justice Order:
(iv) beyond what is provided for in the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the Foreign National has been granted, by submitting
or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including a certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry
or a visa obtained for the Passport by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry), or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing;


Applying the “sin of support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code for violations
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act is a “conscious” “violation of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-08-19:Dear Sir, I'm amazed by the incompetence of the Japanese "Diet member" They don't understand Article 31 of the Constitution. "Diet member" makes the law.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-08-19:Dear Sir,
I'm amazed by the incompetence of the Japanese "Diet member"
They don't understand Article 31 of the Constitution. "Diet member" makes the law.
"Diet member" should have "responsibility" for "law".
This is the right and obligation of "Diet member".
"Diet member" seems to be only "politicians" who insist only on their rights.


Part 1. “Crime of aiding and abetting” for “illegal labor”
by Article 70 “Unqualified Activities” in violation
of the Immigration Act is Article 73-2 “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.
Article 73-2 (1) A person falling under any of the following items is to be punished
with imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine not exceeding 3 million yen,
or is to be subject to the cumulative imposition of imprisonment and a fine:
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=


The landscaping company and the person responsible for hiring foreigners
who are not eligible to work are subject to disposal.
The punishment for three people is unfair.
In this case, the “landscaping companies and managers”
who employed them are not “punished” under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
so they are “innocent” by “equality under the law” and “international law”.

And "support" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be used as "reason
for crime" and "supporter" cannot be "criminal"
It is (Revocation of Status of Residence).

Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to a Foreign National residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
 (except for those recognized as Refugees as set forth in Article 61-2, paragraph (1)),
 the Minister of Justice may revoke the Foreign National's status of residence
 in accordance with the procedures provided for by Ministry of Justice Order:
(iv) beyond what is provided for in the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the Foreign National has been granted, by submitting
or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including a certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry
or a visa obtained for the Passport by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry), or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing;


Applying the “sin of support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code for violations
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act is a “conscious” “violation of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ****

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********************

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion Sunday edition, 18 August 2019:Dear Sirs, Demonstrations over amendments to the “Fugitive Ordinance” continue in Hong Kong. President Donald Trump said, “We received a report from an intelligence agency that the Chinese government was moving troops to the border between mainland China and Hong Kong.” If the Chinese government intervenes. The United States, Britain, France, etc. should “send” an “army” to Hong Kong. Japan should bear “the cost”.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion


Sunday edition, 18 August 2019:Dear Sirs,
Demonstrations over amendments to the “Fugitive Ordinance” continue
in Hong Kong. President Donald Trump said,
“We received a report from an intelligence agency
that the Chinese government was moving troops to the border between mainland China
and Hong Kong.” If the Chinese government intervenes.
The United States, Britain, France, etc. should “send” an “army” to Hong Kong.
Japan should bear “the cost”.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion Sunday edition, 18 August 2019:Dear Sirs, Demonstrations over amendments to the “Fugitive Ordinance” continue in Hong Kong. President Donald Trump said, “We received a report from an intelligence agency that the Chinese government was moving troops to the border between mainland China and Hong Kong.” If the Chinese government intervenes. The United States, Britain, France, etc. should “send” an “army” to Hong Kong. Japan should bear “the cost”.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion


Sunday edition, 18 August 2019:Dear Sirs,
Demonstrations over amendments to the “Fugitive Ordinance” continue
in Hong Kong. President Donald Trump said,
“We received a report from an intelligence agency
that the Chinese government was moving troops to the border between mainland China
and Hong Kong.” If the Chinese government intervenes.
The United States, Britain, France, etc. should “send” an “army” to Hong Kong.
Japan should bear “the cost”.


Part 1. "ANN News" gives details of the video that supports President Trump's statement.
In Hong Kong on December 12, protesters
who continued protests against the government, etc. occupied the international airport,
all flights after the evening canceled, and started operation
from the morning of the 13th, but the demonstrators gathered again in the afternoon,
and all the flights after the evening The departure and arrival flights were canceled.
Demonstrations were held not only at the airport but also at several hospitals.
A woman was "injured in the right eye" by police enforcement.
So they did a “sit-down strike”.
Under these circumstances, the Chinese Communist Party's newspaper,
People's Daily, has released a video showing armed police vehicle units gathering
in Shenzhen near Hong Kong.
Armed police Xi Jinping Jintao directly, is a quasi-military organization to direct side
by side with the People's Liberation Army.
If a large-scale demonstration takes place in Hong Kong on this day,
the Chinese government will be “stained on the face”.
He points out that by October 1, the Chinese government may take some “strong measures”.

Details are below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WY5T7nieVpM

A country of freedom and democracy should protect Hong Kong.
The United States could not do anything during the Tiananmen Incident.
That has given birth to today's US-China trade war.
President Donald Trump is said to leave WTO.
The US should not just run away.
You should fight China with military power to protect freedom, democracy, and human rights.
Of course, countries of freedom and democracy should fight “China” together
with the United States.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. The Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office is “crushing” the crimes of prosecutors even
in violation of the Immigration Control Act.
There are a lot of foreigners (uncountable).
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!
Victims are foreigners who “work illegally” in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.

They have been arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act
and have been subjected to "criminal dispositions" such as "a prison term sentence"
and "fine sentence". And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.
I wrote about this yesterday.

The prosecution has arrested a third party
for charges of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is "I and" Kin Gungaku who is Chinese ".
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.
The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
So, as a crime against foreigner's Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor”,
“Sinners supporting other crimes” of “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” apply.

The “Sin of Support” against Article 70 “Illegal Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act is stipulated in “Sin Promoting Unlawful Employment”
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.
Even if you obtain a status of residence with "false documents",
it is not "illegal labor" if you work within the scope of "status of residence".
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in the “Applicable Law”.
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".
If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.

There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Proposal from Japanese August 17, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “MAKE American dream AGAIN!”. Dear Sir, The “Intensification” of the US-China trade war has made “a farmer who is a strong supporter of President Trump a management difficulty”. Agricultural policy that does not rely on China is necessary!

Proposal from Japanese

August 17, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “MAKE American dream AGAIN!”.

Dear Sir,

The “Intensification” of the US-China trade war has made “a farmer who is a strong supporter of President Trump a management difficulty”. Agricultural policy that does not rely on China is necessary!

Part 1. Introducing Nikkei Newspaper's “Special Features”.

Agricultural powers such as Brazil and Russia come close to China, which has decided to stop importing rice agricultural products as a countermeasure against tariffs, putting downward pressure on commodity prices through expanded supply.

The endless trade war between the United States and China has also cast a shadow on Trump's 2020 presidential election strategy.

The United States exported $ 21.4 billion (about ¥ 2,250.0 billion) of agricultural products to China in 2016, but halved to $ 9.1 billion in 2018 due to intensifying conflict between the United States and China.

In addition, China has announced the suspension of imports of rice agricultural products in order to catch up with the movement of additional tariffs on China.

This is an “opportunity”. “Agricultural powers” ​​such as Brazil and Russia move to “Development in the Chinese market”.

Brazil, which has already overtaken the United States in terms of soybean exports, will “go forward” to “increased production of agricultural products”.

“Brazil will overtake the US in corn exports next year,” says Dan Bassi, Chicago's “grain research firm Agresource.”

Russia, the world's largest exporter of wheat, also approaches China.

The background is the national strategy for expanding the “grain industry”, one of the “pillars of export”.

By 35 years, it is investing 70 billion dollars to establish a large-scale production increase system.

The “predicament” of “American farmers” has become “serious” after “developing” the “Chinese market” over a long time.

“Half of neighboring farmers may“ bankruptcy ”.”

Illinois farmer James McEun says.

For details, please visit the following website.

https://www.nikkei.com/article/DGXMZO48489970T10C19A8000000/?n_cid=NMAIL007

Agricultural policy that does not rely on China is necessary!

The intensification of the US-China trade war is “farm farmers who are strong supporters of President Trump have become difficult to manage.”

In order to protect the farmers, it is necessary to create “special zones” on the Mexican border and accept “provisional immigrants” to increase consumption of agricultural products.

The “special zone” is a place where companies that have moved into China return their factories to the United States.

To that end, we accept “poor people” from Latin America as “provisional immigrants” with a cheap labor force.

“Temporary immigrants” are over 100 million.

“Special Zone” realizes “MAKE American dream AGAIN!”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. In the United States, I “suggest” to build a “special zone” along the border with Mexico.

See April 13, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition.

Japan's immigration policy is worse than the United States.

Japanese immigration law is similar to American immigration law.

America's prosperity is realized by the world being free, democratic, and "ruled under the law".

I seriously seek the rule of law. Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

There are many American victims.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

*

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

Opinion from Japanese Saturday edition, 17 August 2019: Dear Sir, US President Donald Trump said on the 13th that if the situation did not improve, there could be a US (WTO) withdrawal. I think the UN organization should be recreated. “ICC” and “OHCHR” should be “reviewed”. The countries of freedom and democracy should withdraw from “United Nations organizations” and create the necessary organizations.

Opinion from Japanese


Saturday edition, 17 August 2019: Dear Sir,
US President Donald Trump said on the 13th that if the situation did not improve,
there could be a US (WTO) withdrawal. I think the UN organization should be recreated.
“ICC” and “OHCHR” should be “reviewed”.
The countries of freedom and democracy should withdraw from “United Nations organizations”
and create the necessary organizations.


Part 1. According to "AFP" on August 14, Mr. Trump spoke before the "Chemical Factory Workers"
of Royal Dutch Shell in Pennsylvania.
“If necessary, the US“ leaves the WTO ”.
“The WTO has“ exploited us ”for many years,” Trump said.
Mr. Trump said, "Do not repeat such a thing again."
Mr. Trump has been attacking the WTO many times so far and has shown his attitude
of not quitting backout.
He also argues that the US treatment of the WTO is unfair
and that the US government does not need to follow WTO rules.
In particular, China is criticizing that it has been given preferential treatment
by the WTO as a “developing country”.
And China has complained that it is stealing US technology.

All this "cause" is in the United States.
It was the United States that forced China to join the WTO.
Initially, China's accession negotiations were proceeding smoothly,
but when the situation changed completely due to the “Tiananmen Incident”
in June 1989, the negotiations stopped.
However, "Membership" is "passed" at the "Ministerial Conference" held in 2001.
By joining the WTO, China's trade expanded further and became the driving force
for surpassing Japan to become the world's second largest economy.

Companies in each country should be able to compete equally
with the “socialist free economy” dominated by the Communist Party dictatorship.
Now, advanced countries, including the United States,
should leave the WTO and “build” a new “WTO organization”.

South Korea is also making noise.
South Korea also requested the US Department of State to “participation” as a victorious nation
 (Allied country) when the peace treaty with Japan (the San Francisco Peace Treaty) was concluded.
But it was rejected by the United States and the United Kingdom.
Now Korea has said to the abolishment of the “Japan-Korea Basic Treaty”.
The world is now demanding a return to the Cold War era after World War II.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. Many Koreans have been arrested for violating international law and immigration laws.
(I can't count).
Korean, Chinese, Philippine, `` Everyone '' from all over the world!
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!

Victims are foreigners who “work illegally” in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.
They were arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
Received "criminal disposition" such as "fine penalty".
And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.

A third party has been arrested on charges
of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is me and “Kin Gungaku who is Chinese”.
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.

The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
Therefore, as a crime against foreigner immigration law Article 70 "illegal labor"
"Crime that supported other crimes" in "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code" applies.

Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor” is “sin of support”
It is stipulated in “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.

The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.

Even if you get a status of residence with "false documents",
If you work within the scope of your status of residence, it is not “illegal labor”.
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in the “Applicable Law”.
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".

If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yashiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/POTD-July-10-1200x800.jpg

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

朝鮮民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。 2019-08-16：亲爱的先生， 请“支持”我，让日本受自由，民主和法治的支配。 世界上有许多受害者。每个国家的政府都在要求日本在联合国“统治法律”。 媒体应报道这一事实。

朝鮮民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。



2019-08-16：亲爱的先生，
请“支持”我，让日本受自由，民主和法治的支配。
世界上有许多受害者。每个国家的政府都在要求日本在联合国“统治法律”。
媒体应报道这一事实。


第1部分。有关报纸文章的内容，请参阅以下网站。
（日本读卖新闻文章）。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
正如联合国所指出的那样，日本的报纸报道是政府信息操纵的“机构文件”。

该文章的内容如下。
使馆工作人员（司机）“错误地”雇用菲律宾为“家庭佣人”。
“菲律宾人”被给予“虚假就业合同文件”。
“菲律宾”向移民局提出“申请”，并获得“特定活动”的“居住地”。
然而，他们并没有成为“家庭佣人”，而是在东京为“园林公司”工作。

警方以“入境管制法”第70条“不合格活动”的指控逮捕并起诉了三人。
他还于2014年6月逮捕并起诉使馆工作人员（司机），罪名是支持“入境管制法”第70条“不合格活动”。
该罪行的名称是“刑法支持其他罪行的罪犯”第60条和第62条，因为它支持“移民管制法”第70条。

但是，“起诉书”中的“犯罪理由”是支持“移民法”第24-4-（4）条的原因。
在适用的法律中，这是一个有意识的错误。
他们是“无辜的”。它们是“行政处置”。

在审判中，这是对菲律宾的“假释劳动的惩罚”和“强制遣返”。

此外，检察机关根据“收到”“有罪判决”的两个人的故事扩大了犯罪范围。
除了外交官和司机外，三名使馆工作人员被定为刑事犯罪。
据确认，“居民身份”是根据以三人名义签署的雇用合同等文件获得的。

在与国家警察厅，检察院和外交部协商后，外交部要求就使用合同细节和实际工作条件访问大使馆。
原因必须由这四个人来解释。
然而，大使馆回应说他们“回到了家”。
因此，检察官认定“支持”“非法劳工”的可能性更为深远。
我提出报价后立即回到家中，
菲律宾外交官本月6日讲述“三个人”
“将有关案件的文件发送给检察官办公室”。
“怀疑”是违反“移民控制法”第70条的“支持”。
但是，“犯罪原因”是“移民法”第22-4-（4）条中的“支持”。
这是“虚假指控”。

违反移民法（资格以外的活动）的“非法劳工”“犯罪支持”是第73-2条“促进非法就业的犯罪”。
请访问以下网站获取英文文本。
在以下网站，“移民和难民认可法”
（移民控制和难民认可法案）您可以查看最新的全文。
（日语和英语）
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

“移民管制法”第22-4-4条的支持不能作为“犯罪理由”“犯罪”
对于违反“移民管制法”第70条的行为，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持罪”是“有意识的”和“违反适用法律”。
换句话说，“虚假收费”。
检察官仍然不理解这种逻辑。

你可以理解日本移民局处于“腐败状态”。
我问大家。
请介绍一位国际法学家，他可以向日本政府解释这项法律的逻辑。
继续下周。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只要看一下这份“起诉书”，就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“依法治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决它。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持移民法第22-4-4条”
“刑法典”第60条和第62条对“移民管制法”第70条“适用”“支持其他罪行的犯罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人按照第22-4-4条的规定行事（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与“移民法”第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


致最高领导人金正恩请求************


日本政府断言“横田惠美”的“灰烬”是假货。
因为这个“骨干”是假的，所以朝鲜所说的一切都不可信。
所以我们声称要把被绑架者带回来。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”对DNA测试产生了怀疑。
现在联合国和总统唐纳德特朗普是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该在“自然”等问题的基础上予以驳斥。
请按照以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
日本政府应该“解决”绑架外国人的问题。
有许多“韩国人”的“受害者”是“同一种族”。
请“代表”朝鲜半岛人民“抗议日本政府”！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法的情况”。
这是一个证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“事件”。

请宣传日本政府的“不当行为”违规行为。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府正在全力以赴。
如果安倍政府被否决，我认为下届政府将顺从朝鲜。

朝鲜应该宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“宣传”有更多的“外国受害者”，而不是“日本被绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让这个世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
请在外国媒体和联合国宣布朝鲜政府。
朝鲜政府应该特别宣布“我的名字”。我接受


我的资料 ****

邮政编码2610-0003朝鮮民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。



2019-08-16：亲爱的先生，
请“支持”我，让日本受自由，民主和法治的支配。
世界上有许多受害者。每个国家的政府都在要求日本在联合国“统治法律”。
媒体应报道这一事实。


第1部分。有关报纸文章的内容，请参阅以下网站。
（日本读卖新闻文章）。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
正如联合国所指出的那样，日本的报纸报道是政府信息操纵的“机构文件”。

该文章的内容如下。
使馆工作人员（司机）“错误地”雇用菲律宾为“家庭佣人”。
“菲律宾人”被给予“虚假就业合同文件”。
“菲律宾”向移民局提出“申请”，并获得“特定活动”的“居住地”。
然而，他们并没有成为“家庭佣人”，而是在东京为“园林公司”工作。

警方以“入境管制法”第70条“不合格活动”的指控逮捕并起诉了三人。
他还于2014年6月逮捕并起诉使馆工作人员（司机），罪名是支持“入境管制法”第70条“不合格活动”。
该罪行的名称是“刑法支持其他罪行的罪犯”第60条和第62条，因为它支持“移民管制法”第70条。

但是，“起诉书”中的“犯罪理由”是支持“移民法”第24-4-（4）条的原因。
在适用的法律中，这是一个有意识的错误。
他们是“无辜的”。它们是“行政处置”。

在审判中，这是对菲律宾的“假释劳动的惩罚”和“强制遣返”。

此外，检察机关根据“收到”“有罪判决”的两个人的故事扩大了犯罪范围。
除了外交官和司机外，三名使馆工作人员被定为刑事犯罪。
据确认，“居民身份”是根据以三人名义签署的雇用合同等文件获得的。

在与国家警察厅，检察院和外交部协商后，外交部要求就使用合同细节和实际工作条件访问大使馆。
原因必须由这四个人来解释。
然而，大使馆回应说他们“回到了家”。
因此，检察官认定“支持”“非法劳工”的可能性更为深远。
我提出报价后立即回到家中，
菲律宾外交官本月6日讲述“三个人”
“将有关案件的文件发送给检察官办公室”。
“怀疑”是违反“移民控制法”第70条的“支持”。
但是，“犯罪原因”是“移民法”第22-4-（4）条中的“支持”。
这是“虚假指控”。

违反移民法（资格以外的活动）的“非法劳工”“犯罪支持”是第73-2条“促进非法就业的犯罪”。
请访问以下网站获取英文文本。
在以下网站，“移民和难民认可法”
（移民控制和难民认可法案）您可以查看最新的全文。
（日语和英语）
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

“移民管制法”第22-4-4条的支持不能作为“犯罪理由”“犯罪”
对于违反“移民管制法”第70条的行为，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持罪”是“有意识的”和“违反适用法律”。
换句话说，“虚假收费”。
检察官仍然不理解这种逻辑。

你可以理解日本移民局处于“腐败状态”。
我问大家。
请介绍一位国际法学家，他可以向日本政府解释这项法律的逻辑。
继续下周。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只要看一下这份“起诉书”，就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf

第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“依法治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决它。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持移民法第22-4-4条”
“刑法典”第60条和第62条对“移民管制法”第70条“适用”“支持其他罪行的犯罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人按照第22-4-4条的规定行事（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与“移民法”第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


致最高领导人金正恩请求************


日本政府断言“横田惠美”的“灰烬”是假货。
因为这个“骨干”是假的，所以朝鲜所说的一切都不可信。
所以我们声称要把被绑架者带回来。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”对DNA测试产生了怀疑。
现在联合国和总统唐纳德特朗普是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该在“自然”等问题的基础上予以驳斥。
请按照以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
日本政府应该“解决”绑架外国人的问题。
有许多“韩国人”的“受害者”是“同一种族”。
请“代表”朝鲜半岛人民“抗议日本政府”！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法的情况”。
这是一个证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“事件”。

请宣传日本政府的“不当行为”违规行为。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府正在全力以赴。
如果安倍政府被否决，我认为下届政府将顺从朝鲜。

朝鲜应该宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“宣传”有更多的“外国受害者”，而不是“日本被绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让这个世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
请在外国媒体和联合国宣布朝鲜政府。
朝鲜政府应该特别宣布“我的名字”。我接受


我的资料 ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名称Yasuhiro Nagano Nagano Hirohiro
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如果您有任何疑问，请与我们联系。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名称Yasuhiro Nagano Nagano Hirohiro
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如果您有任何疑问，请与我们联系。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp