Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion Sunday edition, 25 August 2019: Dear Sir, It seems that the “Summit declaration” announced at the “G7 Summit” held in France on the 24th to 26th is not “adopted”. But France should lead the implementation of “digital taxation”. The “power” of “France” is tested.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion


Sunday edition, 25 August 2019:
Dear Sir, It seems that the “Summit declaration” announced at the “G7 Summit” held
in France on the 24th to 26th is not “adopted”.
But France should lead the implementation of “digital taxation”.
The “power” of “France” is tested.


Part 1. According to news sources such as Jiji Press,
the “Summit declaration” does not appear to be “adopted”.
A Japanese government official revealed on the 20th.
The reason is that there is a large gap between European
and American opinions on free trade and “climate change measures”.
The publication of “result documents” is expected to be made
in each “individual field” such as “Disparity Issues”.
When no “Summit declaration” is issued at the summit.
Each country is “concerned” that it will increase the influence of China and Russia.

In France, the “Digital Taxation Law” was enacted on the 11th to tax the “part of sales”
of online business in “in France”.
For the United States, where many large IT companies are based,
taxation targeting IT companies could reduce their tax revenues.
For this reason, the US repels that this digital taxation is "unfairly targeting US companies."
We began investigating whether taxation is unfair. Depending
on the outcome, sanctions including tariffs may be considered.
“Mr. Lemer” said at the interview after the end of the meeting on the 17th,
“There remains a“ complex discussion ”on how to specifically deal
with the digitized business!” Said.
It seems that “subtle bargaining” over “specific taxation methods” will continue in the future.

I think France is looking at the “digital business industry” calmly.
Currently, US companies are the main target, but within a few years,
Chinese companies will monopolize a large market.
I think that France should be implemented even with the resistance of the United States,
with the advancement of Chinese companies in mind.
Rather than oppose the French policy,
the United States should make rules that prevent the profits
of the “digital business industry” from being monopolized by China
on the premise of the advance of China.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. The Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office is “crushing” the crimes of prosecutors even
in violation of the Immigration Control Act.
There are a lot of foreigners (uncountable).
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!
Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.

They have been arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act
and have been subjected to "criminal dispositions" such as "a prison term sentence"
and "fine sentence". And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.
I wrote about this yesterday.

The prosecution has arrested a third party for charges
of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is "I and" Kin Gungaku who is Chinese ".
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.
The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
So, as a crime against foreigner's Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor”,
“Sinners supporting other crimes” of “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” apply.

The “Sin of Support” against Article 70 “Illegal Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act is stipulated in “Sin Promoting Unlawful Employment”
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.
Even if you obtain a status of residence with "false documents",
it is not "illegal labor" if you work within the scope of "status of residence".
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in "Applicable Law".
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation"
If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.

There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Proposal from Japanese To President Donald Trump: August 24, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “MAKE American dream AGAIN!”. Dear Sir, Jason Furman, a professor at Harvard University Kennedy School, said, “Donald Trump's defeat is strong” in the trade war with China. A major reason is that “China is strengthening its ties with countries around the world, but the United States is becoming more isolated.” "surely!"

Proposal from Japanese

To President Donald Trump:

August 24, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “MAKE American dream AGAIN!”.

Dear Sir,

Jason Furman, a professor at Harvard University Kennedy School, said, “Donald Trump's defeat is strong” in the trade war with China. A major reason is that “China is strengthening its ties with countries around the world, but the United States is becoming more isolated.” "surely!"

Part 1. “THE WALL STREET JOURNAL” August 20, 2019 [Contribution] “Dr. Donald Trump's“ policy toward China ”seems to be“ failed ””. to introduce.

Mr. Trump's stubborn approach has not led to significant concessions on the Chinese side, but the impact on the US economy is growing.

Currently, China is strengthening its ties with countries around the world, but the United States is becoming more isolated.

In order to effectively counter China's unfair and nationally controlled economic practices, the United States must change its approach.

The United States should make allies and international organizations “an ally, friends, supporters” in order to fulfill the demands.

In other words, it means to “shelf” the trade war that Trump “warned” “friendly countries”.

These include uniform “tariff measures” for Mexico and “tariff measures” for imported cars from Europe.

The United States should “deepen” relationships with partners, such as by “returning” to the “Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP)” to which China does not belong.

The US should also “sue” China at the World Trade Organization (WTO) using “multilateral organizations” and “international rules”.

The past “US administration” has succeeded with a significant “high probability” in the WTO.

Rather, the Trump administration has chosen a way to weaken the WTO by "stopping" the appointment of "a dispute resolution judge".

Even though these “judges” are likely to make decisions in favor of the United States.

Another positive measure is the withdrawal of the “shopping list”.

Requiring China to purchase more Boeing aircraft is not a way to put European countries on the US side in trade disputes with China.

Such a request can also make China's disciplined economic model more robust, while having little use in the medium to long term for the US economy.

The last step would be to adopt a “coherent” procedure to counter China's security threat.

Signals should not be issued to trade security issues and the slight “increase in purchases” of US products and crops by China.

The idea that security concerns are just one of the “negotiation materials” of trade talks is what the US “suggestion”.

This also makes it more difficult to gain support from allies.

The author, Jason Furman, is a professor at Harvard Kennedy School. From 2013 to 2017 he was chairman of the Presidential Economic Advisory Committee (CEA).

I pay homage to Jason Furman's opinion.

I think that the leaders and executives of each government have the same idea.

I think that Mr. Jason Furman is the person necessary for the Trump administration.

Will continue tomorrow

Part 2. In the United States, I “suggest” to build a “special zone” along the border with Mexico.

See April 13, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition.

Japan's immigration policy is worse than the United States.

Japanese immigration law is similar to American immigration law.

America's prosperity is realized by the world being free, democratic, and "ruled under the law".

I seriously seek the rule of law. Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

There are many American victims.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

*

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

Opinion from Japanese Saturday edition, August 24, 2019: Dear Sir, “Unsuitable” for “Golf course”, but I heard the American dream of US President Donald Trump. "Like". The English title is "There Won't Be a Mar-a-Nuuk, But Owning Greenland Isn't a Silly Idea". But priority should be given to the development of “special zones” at the border of Mexico.

Opinion from Japanese


Saturday edition, August 24, 2019: Dear Sir,
“Unsuitable” for “Golf course”, but I heard the American dream of US President Donald Trump.
"Like". The English title is "There Won't Be a Mar-a-Nuuk,
But Owning Greenland Isn't a Silly Idea".
But priority should be given to the development of “special zones” at the border of Mexico.


Part 1. There is an interesting article on Newsweek August 19, 2019 (Japan version).
The English title is "There Won't Be a Mar-a-Nuuk, But Owning Greenland Isn't a Silly Idea".

According to the article, US President Donald Trump was considering a plan to purchase Greenland,
the world's largest island in Denmark.
Apparently he was interested in the strategic location of Greenland
and untouched natural resources.
The New York Times reported on August 15
that Trump has asked several advisors multiple times to seek feedback on Greenland purchases.
Aside from the truth, the concept itself is not “nonsensical”.
US troops are stationed at Thule Air Force Base in northern Greenland,
and the Trump administration has long had a strong interest in the Arctic Circle.
The background is the growing tension between Russia and China over the Arctic Circle,
and the possibility of a new Arctic sea route due to global warming.
China also recognizes the strategic benefits of Greenland.
In 2016 it was “block checked” by Denmark.
That's because we tried to acquire an old base in Greenland.
Danish officials told the media that the "block check" was due to the American "intention".
Last year, a Chinese company failed to build an airport near the Thule base.
In 1946, President Truman then “suggested” a “purchase” for “100 million dollars”.

For more information 
https://www.newsweekjapan.jp/stories/world/2019/08/post-12792.php


At the end of this article:
A spokesman for the right-wing Danish National Party,
which is cooperating with the government ruling party,
told the TV station that "if you really think about this,
it's the definitive evidence that he (Trump) went wrong."
“The idea that Denmark sells 50,000 people to America for money is completely ridiculous.”

Certainly, President Donald Trump's remarks are “funny”.
But isn't it! This is "American Dream".
Rather than acquiring Greenland, I think we should immediately build a “special zone”
on the US side of the Mexican border and build an “industrial park”
that can compete with China.
This is “American Dream”.
So I say: “MAKE American dream AGAIN!”.
It will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. Many Koreans have been arrested for violating international law and immigration laws.
(I can't count).
Korean, Chinese, Philippine, `` Everyone '' from all over the world!
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!

Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.
They were arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
Received "criminal disposition" such as "fine penalty".
And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.

A third party has been arrested on charges of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor"
of foreigners.
The victim is me and “Kin Gungaku who is Chinese”.
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.

The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
Therefore, as a crime against foreigner immigration law Article 70 "illegal labor"
"Crime that supported other crimes" in "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code" applies.

Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor” is “sin of support”
It is stipulated in “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.

The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.

Even if you get a status of residence with "false documents",
If you work within the scope of your status of residence, it is not “illegal labor”.
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in "Applicable Law".
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation"

If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate,
so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yashiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/POTD-July-10-1200x800.jpg

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。 2019-08-23：亲爱的先生，日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。 因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。 这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。


2019-08-23：亲爱的先生，
唐纳德特朗普总统与朝鲜合作攻击韩国
它将是“统一朝鲜半岛的英雄”。
在美国总统大选之前，有必要统一朝鲜半岛。
国际社会应密切关注唐纳德·特兰总统和金若恩部长的“战略”。


第1部分。在这种情况下，“美化公司”不会受到“移民法”第73-2条“促进非法就业罪”的“惩罚”。
但是，由于与违反“移民法”第70条无关的原因，只有菲律宾外交官和雇员才是犯罪行为。
“惩罚”是违法的。
“起诉书”中的“犯罪原因”
为了回应违反“移民法”第22-4-4条并获得居留身份，
菲律宾外交官或雇员“签发”“虚假就业合同”并加入“移民法”第22-4-4条
描述“支持”的事实。

这是安倍首相的“依法治理”。
即使是日本宪法第31条也被忽略了。


第三十一条没有人遵循法律规定的程序，
您不会被剥夺其生命或自由，也不会对任何其他惩罚负责。

第三十一条除依照法律规定的程序外，不得剥夺任何人的生命或自由，也不得实施其他刑事处罚。

根据“移民控制法”第73-2条，只有被称为“非法劳工”而没有“惩罚”“罪犯”的菲律宾人
“惩罚”是违法的。
这违反了日本宪法的“法律平等”。
它也违反了国际法。
他们应该被无罪释放。

根据“移民管制法”第22-4-4条的“支持”不能与“犯罪理由”“犯罪”
“刑法”第60条和第62条违反“移民管制法”第70条
申请“犯罪”是“违反适用法律”。
换句话说，“虚假收费”。
检察官仍然不理解这种逻辑。

你可以理解日本移民局处于“腐败状态”。
我问大家。
请介绍一位国际法学家，他可以向日本政府解释这项法律的逻辑。
继续下周。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只看这个“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）“移民控制和难民认可法”
“移民控制和难民认可法”
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法典
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“依法治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决它。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。
但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持第22-4-4条移民法”
“刑法”第60条和第62条，反对“入境管制法”第70条
“应用”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
执行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与“移民法”第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。
材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


请问最高领导人金正恩，*****************************************


日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。
这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”提出了关于DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该根据“自然”问题予以驳斥。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应该绑架外国人”应该“解决”。
有很多“同族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表“朝鲜半岛人民”抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“案例”。

请公布日本政府“移民法”的失实陈述。
请宣布这些事情并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”有更多“外国受害者”而不是“日本绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应该在外国媒体和联合国公布。
朝鲜政府应该特别披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的资料 ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名字Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如有任何问题，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump 2019-08-23:Dear Sir,The international community should pay close attention to the “strategy” of President Donald Tran and Secretary Kim Joo Eun.

To President Trump


2019-08-23:Dear Sir,
President Donald Trump will become “a hero who unifies the Korean peninsula”
by attacking South Korea in partnership with North Korea.
It is necessary to unify the Korean peninsula before the US presidential election.
The international community should pay close attention to the “strategy”
of President Donald Tran and Secretary Kim Joo Eun.


Part 1. In this case, the “landscaping company” will not be “punished”
by the Immigration Act Article 73-2 “Crime to Promote Unlawful Employment”.
However, it is illegal to “punish” only Philippine diplomats and staff
for criminal reasons that are not related to violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The “crime reason” of “bill of indictment” is
that the Philippine people violated Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law
and obtained status of residence.
It describes the fact that a Philippine diplomat
or employee “issued” a “false employment contract”
and “supported” the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

This is Prime Minister Abe's “governance under the law”.
Even Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution is ignored.

Article 31. No person shall be deprived of his life or freedom or be punished
by any other punishment unless he follows the procedures prescribed by law.
Article 31. No person shall be deprived of life
or liberty, nor shall any other criminal penalty be imposed,
except according to procedure established by law.
It is illegal to “punish” only Filipinos who have been made “illegal workers”
without “punishing” “criminals under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act”.
This violates the “Equality under the Law” of the Constitution of Japan.
It also violates international law.
They should be acquitted.

“Support” under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be “criminal”
with “reason for crime”
Applying the “Sin of Support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is a “breach of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ******



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

******

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-08-23: Monsieur, Le président Donald Trump fait équipe avec la Corée du Nord pour attaquer la Corée du Sud

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-08-23: Monsieur,
Le président Donald Trump fait équipe avec la Corée du Nord pour attaquer la Corée du Sud
Ce sera «un héros qui unifie la péninsule coréenne».
Il est nécessaire d'unifier la péninsule coréenne avant l'élection présidentielle américaine.
La communauté internationale devrait accorder une attention particulière à la «stratégie» du président Donald Tran et du secrétaire Kim Joo Eun.


Partie 1 Dans ce cas, «l'entreprise d'aménagement paysager» ne sera pas «punie» par l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration «Criminalité visant à promouvoir l'emploi illégal».
Toutefois, seuls les diplomates et les employés philippins sont criminels pour des raisons non liées à la violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Il est illégal de "punir".
Le "motif du crime" dans "Bil of accusation"
En réponse à la violation de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration et à l'obtention du statut de résidence,
Un diplomate ou employé philippin "établit" un "faux contrat de travail" et entre dans la loi relative à l'immigration, article 22-4-4
Décrit le fait de «soutien».

C’est la «gouvernance sous la loi» du Premier ministre Abe.
Même l'article 31 de la Constitution japonaise est ignoré.


Article 31. Si personne ne suit les procédures prescrites par la loi,
Vous ne serez pas privé de sa vie ou de sa liberté, ou serez passible de toute autre peine.

Article 31. Nul ne peut être privé de la vie ou de la liberté, et aucune autre peine pénale ne peut être infligée, si ce n'est conformément à la procédure établie par la loi.

Seuls les Philippins qui ont été faits "des travailleurs illégaux" sans "punir" les "criminels au sens de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration"
Il est illégal de "punir".
Cela viole «l'égalité devant la loi» de la Constitution du Japon.
Cela viole également le droit international.
Ils devraient être acquittés.

Le «soutien» visé à l’article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration ne peut pas être «criminel» avec «motif du crime»
Articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal pour violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
L'application d'un «coupable de soutien» est une «violation de la loi applicable».
En d'autres termes, "Faux accusations".
Les procureurs ne comprennent toujours pas cette logique.

Vous pouvez comprendre que l'administration de l'immigration japonaise est dans un «état pourri».
Je demande à tout le monde.
Veuillez présenter un juriste international qui peut expliquer la logique de cette loi au gouvernement japonais.
Continuez jusqu'à la semaine prochaine.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence».
Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».
Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-08-23: Sehr geehrter Herr, Präsident Donald Trump tut sich mit Nordkorea zusammen, um Südkorea anzugreifen

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-08-23: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Präsident Donald Trump tut sich mit Nordkorea zusammen, um Südkorea anzugreifen
Es wird "ein Held sein, der die koreanische Halbinsel vereint".
Es ist notwendig, die koreanische Halbinsel vor den US-Präsidentschaftswahlen zu vereinheitlichen.
Die internationale Gemeinschaft sollte der „Strategie“ von Präsident Donald Tran und Sekretär Kim Joo Eun große Aufmerksamkeit widmen.


Teil 1. In diesem Fall wird das „Landschaftsbauunternehmen“ nicht nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2 „Straftat zur Förderung der illegalen Beschäftigung“ „bestraft“.
Allerdings sind nur philippinische Diplomaten und Angestellte aus Gründen strafbar, die nicht mit einem Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes zusammenhängen.
Es ist illegal zu "bestrafen".
Der Grund für das Verbrechen in der Anklageschrift
In Reaktion auf einen Verstoß gegen Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes und die Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus
Ein philippinischer Diplomat oder Angestellter "stellt" einen "falschen Arbeitsvertrag" aus und tritt in den Einwanderungsgesetz-Artikel 22-4-4 ein
Beschreibt die Tatsache der "Unterstützung".

Dies ist Premierminister Abes "Governance unter dem Gesetz".
Auch Artikel 31 der japanischen Verfassung wird ignoriert.


Artikel 31. Wenn niemand die gesetzlich vorgeschriebenen Verfahren befolgt,
Sie werden nicht ihres Lebens oder ihrer Freiheit beraubt oder werden für irgendeine andere Bestrafung haftbar gemacht

Artikel 31. Niemandem wird das Leben oder die Freiheit entzogen, und es darf keine andere strafrechtliche Sanktion verhängt werden, es sei denn nach dem gesetzlich festgelegten Verfahren.

Nur Filipinos, die "illegale Arbeiter" geworden sind, ohne "Verbrecher" nach Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "zu bestrafen"
Es ist illegal zu "bestrafen".
Dies verstößt gegen die "Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz" der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt auch gegen internationales Recht.
Sie sollten freigesprochen werden.

"Unterstützung" nach Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes kann nicht "kriminell" mit "Grund für Kriminalität" sein
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs für Verstöße gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Die Anwendung einer „Unterstützungsschuld“ ist ein „Verstoß gegen geltendes Recht“.
Mit anderen Worten, "Falsche Gebühren".
Die Staatsanwälte verstehen diese Logik immer noch nicht.

Sie können verstehen, dass sich die japanische Einwanderungsbehörde in einem „faulen Zustand“ befindet.
Ich frage alle.
Bitte stellen Sie einen internationalen Juristen vor, der der japanischen Regierung die Logik dieses Gesetzes erklären kann.
Weiter zur nächsten Woche.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“.
Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.
Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-08-23:Dear Sir, South Korea decided to “destroy” the “Japan-Korea Comprehensive Military Information Protection Agreement” (GSOMIA).

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-08-23:Dear Sir,
President Donald Trump will become “a hero who unifies the Korean peninsula”
by attacking South Korea in partnership with North Korea.
It is necessary to unify the Korean peninsula before the US presidential election.
The international community should pay close attention to the “strategy”
of President Donald Tran and Secretary Kim Joo Eun.


Part 1. In this case, the “landscaping company” will not be “punished”
by the Immigration Act Article 73-2 “Crime to Promote Unlawful Employment”.
However, it is illegal to “punish” only Philippine diplomats and staff
for criminal reasons that are not related to violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The “crime reason” of “bill of indictment” is
that the Philippine people violated Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law
and obtained status of residence.
It describes the fact that a Philippine diplomat
or employee “issued” a “false employment contract”
and “supported” the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

This is Prime Minister Abe's “governance under the law”.
Even Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution is ignored.

Article 31. No person shall be deprived of his life or freedom or be punished
by any other punishment unless he follows the procedures prescribed by law.
Article 31. No person shall be deprived of life
or liberty, nor shall any other criminal penalty be imposed,
except according to procedure established by law.
It is illegal to “punish” only Filipinos who have been made “illegal workers”
without “punishing” “criminals under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act”.
This violates the “Equality under the Law” of the Constitution of Japan.
It also violates international law.
They should be acquitted.

“Support” under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be “criminal”
with “reason for crime”
Applying the “Sin of Support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is a “breach of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-08-23:Dear Sir, President Donald Trump will become “a hero who unifies the Korean peninsula” by attacking South Korea in partnership with North Korea. It is necessary to unify the Korean peninsula before the US presidential election. The international community should pay close attention to the “strategy” of President Donald Tran and Secretary Kim Joo Eun.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-08-23:Dear Sir,
President Donald Trump will become “a hero who unifies the Korean peninsula”
by attacking South Korea in partnership with North Korea.
It is necessary to unify the Korean peninsula before the US presidential election.
The international community should pay close attention to the “strategy”
of President Donald Tran and Secretary Kim Joo Eun.


Part 1. In this case, the “landscaping company” will not be “punished”
by the Immigration Act Article 73-2 “Crime to Promote Unlawful Employment”.
However, it is illegal to “punish” only Philippine diplomats and staff
for criminal reasons that are not related to violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The “crime reason” of “bill of indictment” is
that the Philippine people violated Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law
and obtained status of residence.
It describes the fact that a Philippine diplomat
or employee “issued” a “false employment contract”
and “supported” the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

This is Prime Minister Abe's “governance under the law”.
Even Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution is ignored.

Article 31. No person shall be deprived of his life or freedom or be punished
by any other punishment unless he follows the procedures prescribed by law.
Article 31. No person shall be deprived of life
or liberty, nor shall any other criminal penalty be imposed,
except according to procedure established by law.
It is illegal to “punish” only Filipinos who have been made “illegal workers”
without “punishing” “criminals under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act”.
This violates the “Equality under the Law” of the Constitution of Japan.
It also violates international law.
They should be acquitted.

“Support” under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be “criminal”
with “reason for crime”
Applying the “Sin of Support” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act is a “breach of applicable law”.
In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ****

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********************

help me Opinion 致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。 2019-08-22：尊敬的先生， 韩国的反日运动即将结束。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。


2019-08-22：尊敬的先生，
韩国的反日运动即将结束。
韩国政府提议朝鲜半岛统一采取朝鲜的核导弹，
朝鲜政府已经读过“韩国的战略”。
韩国“GSOMIA”的“摧毁”归于“自我毁灭”。


第1部分。非法工作的三名菲律宾人“非法劳工”
“园艺公司”不应该被无罪释放，因为它没有被“惩罚”。

对于制造虚假劳动合同并将其交给菲律宾的外交官和大使馆官员，
根据2010年7月以来实施的移民法，将进行以下处理。
1）如果根据“移民法”第22-4-4条的“移民身份”处理了三人，
（1）“取消居留身份”。
这是由司法部长提供“取消居留身份通知书”来完成的。
（2）驱逐出境是强制性的。 -
2）根据“移民控制法”第22-4-4条，如果三人未根据“取消居留身份”处置，
他们是无辜的。

菲律宾给了他们“虚假就业合同”这一事实
对“移民法”第22-4-4条所述事项的“协助”，
它不是“移民管制法”第70条“非法劳工”的“支持”。

“移民管制法”第22-4-4条的支持不能作为“犯罪理由”“犯罪”
对于违反“移民管制法”第70条的行为，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持罪”是
“意识”“违反适用法律”。换句话说，“虚假收费”。
检察官仍然不理解这种逻辑。

你可以理解日本移民局处于“腐败状态”。
我问大家。
请介绍一位国际法学家，他可以向日本政府解释这项法律的逻辑。
继续下周。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只看这个“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）“移民控制和难民认可法”
“移民控制和难民认可法”
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法典
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“依法治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决它。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持第22-4-4条移民法”
“刑法”第60条和第62条，反对“入境管制法”第70条
“应用”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
执行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与“移民法”第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
世界上有许多受害者。


最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


请问最高领导人金正恩，*****************************************


日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。
这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”提出了关于DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该根据“自然”问题予以驳斥。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应该绑架外国人”应该“解决”。
有很多“同族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表“朝鲜半岛人民”抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“案例”。

请公布日本政府“移民法”的失实陈述。
请宣布这些事情并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”有更多“外国受害者”而不是“日本绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应该在外国媒体和联合国公布。
朝鲜政府应该特别披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的资料 ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名字Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如有任何问题，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-08-22:Dear Sir, South Korea's anti-Japan movement will end. The South Korean government has proposed unification of the Korean Peninsula in order to take North Korea's nuclear missiles,

To President Trump


2019-08-22:Dear Sir,
South Korea's anti-Japan movement will end.
The South Korean government has proposed unification of the Korean Peninsula
in order to take North Korea's nuclear missiles,
but the North Korean government has read “South Korea's Strategy”.
The “destroy” of “GSOMIA” in South Korea goes to “self-destruction”.


Part 1. Three of the Philippine who worked illegally should be acquitted
because the "gardening company" that caused "illegal labor" has not been "punished".

In addition, diplomats and embassy officials who have made false employment contracts
and handed them to the Philippines are subject to the following disposals according
to the Immigration Law, which was established in July 2010.
1) If three people have been disposed of under “Immigration Status”
of Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law,
(1) “Cancellation of status of residence”.
This is done by the Minister of Justice delivering a “Notification of Cancellation
of Status of Residence”.
(2) Deportation is a forced disposition.・
2) If three persons have not been disposed of under the “Cancellation
of Status of Residence” under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
They are innocent.

The fact that the Filipinos gave them a “false employment contract”
in order to obtain “residence status” was “assistance”
in the matters described in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act,
and Article 70 of the Immigration Act. It is not “support” for “illegal labor”.

The support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act cannot be "criminal" as "reason for crime"
For violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act, the “sin of support”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code is “conscious”
and “violation of applicable laws”. In other words, “False charges”.
Prosecutors still do not understand this logic.

You can understand that Japanese immigration administration is in a “rotten state”.
I ask everyone.
Please introduce an international jurist who can explain the logic
of this law to the Japanese government.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural that terrorism resolves. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ******



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

******

help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-08-22: Monsieur, Le mouvement anti-japonais en Corée du Sud est sur le point de prendre fin. Le gouvernement sud-coréen a proposé l’unification de la péninsule coréenne pour prendre les missiles nucléaires nord-coréens,

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-08-22: Monsieur,
Le mouvement anti-japonais en Corée du Sud est sur le point de prendre fin.
Le gouvernement sud-coréen a proposé l’unification de la péninsule coréenne pour prendre les missiles nucléaires nord-coréens,
Le gouvernement nord-coréen a lu "Stratégie de la Corée du Sud".
La «destruction» de «GSOMIA» en Corée du Sud va à «l'autodestruction».


Partie 1 Trois des Philippins qui travaillaient illégalement ont fait du "travail illégal"
La "société de jardinage" ne devrait pas être acquittée car elle n'a pas été "punie".

Pour les diplomates et les ambassades qui ont créé de faux contrats de travail et les ont donnés aux Philippines,
Les dispositions suivantes seront prises conformément à la loi sur l'immigration mise en œuvre depuis juillet 2010.
1) Si trois personnes ont été éliminées en vertu du «Statut d’immigration» de l’article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l’immigration,
(1) «Annulation du statut de résidence».
Ceci est fait par le ministre de la Justice qui délivre une «Notification d'annulation de statut de résidence».
(2) L'expulsion est une décision forcée. -
2) Si trois personnes n'ont pas été éliminées en vertu de la «Annulation du statut de résidence» en vertu de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration,
Ils sont innocents.

Le fait que les Philippines leur aient donné un "faux contrat de travail"
«Assistance» pour les affaires décrites dans l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration,
Ce n'est pas un «soutien» de l'article 70 «Travail illégal» de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

L’appui de l’article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration ne peut être qualifié de "criminel" en tant que "motif du crime"
En cas de violation de l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration, le «crime d’aide» aux articles 60 et 62 du code pénal est
«Conscience» «violation du droit applicable». En d'autres termes, "Faux accusations".
Les procureurs ne comprennent toujours pas cette logique.

Vous pouvez comprendre que l'administration de l'immigration japonaise est dans un «état pourri».
Je demande à tout le monde.
Veuillez présenter un juriste international qui peut expliquer la logique de cette loi au gouvernement japonais.
Continuez jusqu'à la semaine prochaine.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.


Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-08-22: Sehr geehrter Herr, Südkoreas Anti-Japan-Bewegung steht kurz vor dem Ende.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-08-22: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Südkoreas Anti-Japan-Bewegung steht kurz vor dem Ende.
Die südkoreanische Regierung schlug die Vereinigung der koreanischen Halbinsel vor, um Nordkoreas Atomraketen
Die nordkoreanische Regierung hat "Südkoreas Strategie" gelesen.
Die "Zerstörung" von "GSOMIA" in Südkorea geht zur "Selbstzerstörung".


Teil 1. Drei der Philippinen, die illegal arbeiteten, machten "illegale Arbeit"
Die "Gartenbaugesellschaft" sollte nicht freigesprochen werden, weil sie nicht "bestraft" wurde.

Für Diplomaten und Botschaftsbeamte, die falsche Arbeitsverträge erstellt und sie auf die Philippinen gegeben haben,
Die folgenden Bestimmungen richten sich nach dem seit Juli 2010 geltenden Einwanderungsgesetz.
1) Wurden drei Personen gemäß Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes „Einwanderungsstatus“ entsorgt,
(1) "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus".
Dies geschieht durch den Justizminister, der eine „Mitteilung über die Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus“ vorlegt.
(2) Die Abschiebung ist eine Zwangsdisposition.・
2) Wurden drei Personen nicht im Rahmen der „Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus“ gemäß Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes entsorgt,
Sie sind unschuldig.

Die Tatsache, dass die Philippinen ihnen einen "falschen Arbeitsvertrag" gaben
"Unterstützung" für Angelegenheiten, die im Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4 beschrieben sind,
Es ist keine „Unterstützung“ von Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeit“ des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Die Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes kann nicht als "Grund für Straftaten" "strafbar" sein.
Bei Verstößen gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes gilt in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches das Verbrechen um Unterstützung
"Bewusster" "Verstoß gegen geltendes Recht". Mit anderen Worten, "Falsche Gebühren".
Die Staatsanwälte verstehen diese Logik immer noch nicht.

Sie können verstehen, dass sich die japanische Einwanderungsbehörde in einem „faulen Zustand“ befindet.
Ich frage alle.
Bitte stellen Sie einen internationalen Juristen vor, der der japanischen Regierung die Logik dieses Gesetzes erklären kann.
Weiter zur nächsten Woche.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.


Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp