To President Trump
2019-08-27: Dear Sir,
The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.
Philippine government officials
and citizens should “petition” the “President Rodrigo Roa Duterte”.
The Philippine government should “request” the Japanese government for “recovery of honor”
and “compensation” for the people of the Philippines.
Part 1. I will tell you why I am familiar with this matter.
Because I was "punished" like a diplomat.
The “Chinese” was “arrested” in June 2010 for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Act
(non-qualified activities).
On the other hand, I was arrested and "punished" for "crimes to support other crimes"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
Moreover, the reason for the crime is the fact of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
They applied the Criminal Code Article 60 and 62 “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”
to administrative punishment.
In other words, for the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
(non-qualified activities), the immigration law Article 22-4- (4) is stated as the reason
for the crime. And apply the crimes that support other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
This is the logic of crazy law.
I insisted this on the prosecutor.
But the prosecutor says:
"No one believes in your" logic of law "!"
I also told lawyers.
Lawyers are not capable of making “legal claims” of “legality principle”.
In other words, we will not point out that the applicable law is violated.
So in the “appeal” to the Supreme Court, I made my own “appeal” and made the above claims.
The decision of the Supreme Court is “Rejection”.
The reason is that the above claim is merely an "incorrect application law" claim
and is not "the matter to be deliberated" by the Supreme Court
under the provisions of the "Criminal Procedure Law".
So you say you should do “retrial plea”.
However, in the “Criminal Procedure Law”,
“request for retrial” cannot be made for the reason of “error of applicable law”.
However, if a police officer or prosecutor has a “fact” of “crime”,
a “request for retrial” can be made.
The criminal facts of police officers and prosecutors have not violated any Japanese law,
but they have made false charges (requests for arrest, transmission and prosecution),
so they are Article 172 "False accusation" of the Penal Code.
They also arrested and imprisoned me, and they were “abuse of authority
by special public officer” in Article 193 of the Penal Code.
The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.
You should protest against the Japanese government.
There are many victims in each country.
Governments in each country should “protest” the Japanese government.
And we should seek the restoration and compensation of the honor of victims in each country.
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
2019-08-27: Dear Sir,
The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.
Philippine government officials
and citizens should “petition” the “President Rodrigo Roa Duterte”.
The Philippine government should “request” the Japanese government for “recovery of honor”
and “compensation” for the people of the Philippines.
Part 1. I will tell you why I am familiar with this matter.
Because I was "punished" like a diplomat.
The “Chinese” was “arrested” in June 2010 for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Act
(non-qualified activities).
On the other hand, I was arrested and "punished" for "crimes to support other crimes"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
Moreover, the reason for the crime is the fact of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
They applied the Criminal Code Article 60 and 62 “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”
to administrative punishment.
In other words, for the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
(non-qualified activities), the immigration law Article 22-4- (4) is stated as the reason
for the crime. And apply the crimes that support other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
This is the logic of crazy law.
I insisted this on the prosecutor.
But the prosecutor says:
"No one believes in your" logic of law "!"
I also told lawyers.
Lawyers are not capable of making “legal claims” of “legality principle”.
In other words, we will not point out that the applicable law is violated.
So in the “appeal” to the Supreme Court, I made my own “appeal” and made the above claims.
The decision of the Supreme Court is “Rejection”.
The reason is that the above claim is merely an "incorrect application law" claim
and is not "the matter to be deliberated" by the Supreme Court
under the provisions of the "Criminal Procedure Law".
So you say you should do “retrial plea”.
However, in the “Criminal Procedure Law”,
“request for retrial” cannot be made for the reason of “error of applicable law”.
However, if a police officer or prosecutor has a “fact” of “crime”,
a “request for retrial” can be made.
The criminal facts of police officers and prosecutors have not violated any Japanese law,
but they have made false charges (requests for arrest, transmission and prosecution),
so they are Article 172 "False accusation" of the Penal Code.
They also arrested and imprisoned me, and they were “abuse of authority
by special public officer” in Article 193 of the Penal Code.
The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.
You should protest against the Japanese government.
There are many victims in each country.
Governments in each country should “protest” the Japanese government.
And we should seek the restoration and compensation of the honor of victims in each country.
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
