help me Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-08-29: Dear Sir, Therefore, we decided to indictment. The prosecution has also “hidden” this “a letter of complaint”. It is a completely vicious “judicial administration”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-08-29: Dear Sir,
Looking at an article dated February 20, 2015 in the Yomiuri Shimbun,
four Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
in June 2010 “Unqualified Labor”. This is exactly the same as the case
where “I and Kingungaku” were “punished” under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for “the crime of that support”. This is a “false charge”.
Therefore, we decided to indictment.
The prosecution has also “hidden” this “a letter of complaint”.
It is a completely vicious “judicial administration”.


Part 1. Organize the content of newspaper articles.
(1) Arrested in June 2014.
From March 2012 to June 2014 Three Filipino men
(35 years old to 52 years old) who worked illegally outside the status
of residence at a landscaping company.
The status of residence was a specific activity as a “servant of domestic work”.
The punishment is one year of “labor punishment”.
However, it is “3 year probation”.

Philippine embassy official (driver) who issued their false employment contract above.
The criminal law Articles 60 and 62 were applied
for the reason of supporting the immigration law 22-4- (4).
The punishment is “Labor Penalty” June 1st.
However, “4 years of probation”.
This is clearly a “false charge” due to an “incorrect application law”.
(2) November 2014 Requested visits to four other embassy staff
on suspicion of support under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
A diplomat (42) and three men and women (49-58 years old).
The reason for the crime against them is “support” in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Specifically, they provided “false employment contracts” to Philippine
who worked outside of the qualifications, and provided them
with “support” to obtain resident status. This is not a crime.
(3) There was an “answer” in December 2014. One person has returned to the Philippines
in July 2014.
The three diplomats returned to the Philippines immediately after the application (November).
(4) Therefore, on February 6, 2015, three persons were punished as follows
for reasons of violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The reason for the crime was the immigration law 22-4- (4),
and the following processing was performed in Articles 60 and 62 of “Crime of Support”
in the Penal Code
“Send the papers pertaining to a (criminal) case to the Public Prosecutors Office”.

The prosecutors are still committing crimes every day.

I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-08-29: Dear Sir, Looking at an article dated February 20, 2015 in the Yomiuri Shimbun, four Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act in June 2010 “Unqualified Labor”. This is exactly the same as the case where “I and Kingungaku” were “punished” under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code for “the crime of that support”. This is a “false charge”.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-08-29: Dear Sir,
Looking at an article dated February 20, 2015 in the Yomiuri Shimbun,
four Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
in June 2010 “Unqualified Labor”. This is exactly the same as the case
where “I and Kingungaku” were “punished” under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for “the crime of that support”. This is a “false charge”.
Therefore, we decided to indictment.
The prosecution has also “hidden” this “a letter of complaint”.
It is a completely vicious “judicial administration”.


Part 1. Organize the content of newspaper articles.
(1) Arrested in June 2014.
From March 2012 to June 2014 Three Filipino men
(35 years old to 52 years old) who worked illegally outside the status
of residence at a landscaping company.
The status of residence was a specific activity as a “servant of domestic work”.
The punishment is one year of “labor punishment”.
However, it is “3 year probation”.

Philippine embassy official (driver) who issued their false employment contract above.
The criminal law Articles 60 and 62 were applied
for the reason of supporting the immigration law 22-4- (4).
The punishment is “Labor Penalty” June 1st.
However, “4 years of probation”.
This is clearly a “false charge” due to an “incorrect application law”.
(2) November 2014 Requested visits to four other embassy staff
on suspicion of support under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
A diplomat (42) and three men and women (49-58 years old).
The reason for the crime against them is “support” in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Specifically, they provided “false employment contracts” to Philippine
who worked outside of the qualifications, and provided them
with “support” to obtain resident status. This is not a crime.
(3) There was an “answer” in December 2014. One person has returned to the Philippines
in July 2014.
The three diplomats returned to the Philippines immediately after the application (November).
(4) Therefore, on February 6, 2015, three persons were punished as follows
for reasons of violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The reason for the crime was the immigration law 22-4- (4),
and the following processing was performed in Articles 60 and 62 of “Crime of Support”
in the Penal Code
“Send the papers pertaining to a (criminal) case to the Public Prosecutors Office”.

The prosecutors are still committing crimes every day.

I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ****

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********************

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人 2019-08-28：尊敬的先生， 日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。 因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人


2019-08-28：尊敬的先生，
我想你可以理解日本司法行政处于“严重状态”。
我问大家。日本是一个贸易大国。只有国际社会的“力量”才能解决这个问题。


第1部分。向千叶地区法院提出的投诉违反了菲律宾的“移民管制法”。
投诉的开头被省略。
指控的目的。
根据2015年2月20日的早报，如“读卖新闻”，
菲律宾大使馆的外交官和官员向公众报告说，他们因违反移民法而被定罪。

该文章的内容是菲律宾大使馆的司机，
作为家庭工人虚假雇佣您所在国家的菲律宾人
向菲律宾提供虚假劳动合同，菲律宾申请移民，
我已获得“特定活动”的居住身份，但没有作为家庭工人工作，
有三人因在东京一家园林绿化公司工作而被指控违反“入境管制法”（不合格活动）。
2014年6月，大使馆司机因违反移民法（不合格活动）的刑法“援助罪”被逮捕和起诉。
在审判中，它被判处“缓刑”和“缓刑”，并被“驱逐出境”。

根据两个更有罪的判决的故事，警方与司机分别确认以下内容。
被称为“外交和使馆工作人员男女”
根据雇佣合同等文件，菲律宾人有“居住资格”。
神奈川县警察与国家警察局，检察官办公室和外交部进行了协商，
我需要接受这四个人关于合同细节和实际工作的解释，
通过外交部向大使馆提出申请。
然而，因为他们回答他们已经回到家中，他们认为他们更有可能帮助“非法就业”。
关于申请后立即回国的“三名外交官”，
本月6日，他们被指控支持违反“移民控制法”。
“将有关（刑事）案件的文件发送给检察官办公室”。

我想你可以理解日本司法行政处于“严重状态”。
我问大家。日本是一个贸易大国。
只有国际社会的“力量”才能解决这个问题。
每个国家都有许多受害者。

它将在明天继续。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只要看一下这份“起诉书”，就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）“移民控制和难民认可法”
“移民控制和难民认可法”
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法典
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“法治下的治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持第22-4-4条移民法”
根据“移民管制法”第70条“适用”“刑法典”第60条和第62条“罪犯支持其他犯罪”
这是“疯狂”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
执行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”并不是“移民法”第70条的原因。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


请问最高领导人金正恩，*****************************************


日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。
这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”提出了关于DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该根据“自然”问题予以驳斥。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应该绑架外国人”应该“解决”。
有很多“同族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表“朝鲜半岛人民”抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“案例”。

请公布日本政府“移民法”的失实陈述
请宣布这些事情并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”有更多“外国受害者”而不是“日本绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应该在外国媒体和联合国公布。
朝鲜政府应该特别披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的资料 ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名字Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如有任何问题，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-08-28: Monsieur, Je pense que vous pouvez comprendre que l’administration judiciaire japonaise est dans un «état grave». Je demande à tout le monde. Le Japon est une puissance commerciale. Il n’ya que le «pouvoir» de la communauté internationale pour résoudre ce problème.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-08-28: Monsieur,
Je pense que vous pouvez comprendre que l’administration judiciaire japonaise est dans un «état grave».
Je demande à tout le monde. Le Japon est une puissance commerciale. Il n’ya que le «pouvoir» de la communauté internationale pour résoudre ce problème.


Partie 1 Une plainte auprès du tribunal du district de Chiba, en violation de la loi philippine sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Le début de la plainte est omis.
Le but de l'accusation.
Selon le journal du matin du 20 février 2015, tel que le Yomiuri Shimbun,
Des diplomates et des représentants de l'ambassade des Philippines ont déclaré au public qu'ils étaient criminalisés pour violation de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le contenu de l'article est le chauffeur de l'ambassade des Philippines,
Embaucher à tort un Philippin dans votre pays d'origine en tant que travailleur domestique
Délivrer un faux contrat de travail aux Philippines, et ce dernier demande l'immigration,
J'ai obtenu le statut de résidence pour des "activités spécifiques", mais sans travailler comme domestique,
Trois personnes ont été accusées d'avoir enfreint la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration (activités non qualifiées) pour avoir travaillé dans une entreprise d'aménagement paysager à Tokyo.
Le conducteur de l'ambassade a été arrêté et poursuivi en juin 2014 pour une «infraction d'assistance» pénale pour violation du droit de l'immigration (activités non qualifiées).
Au procès, il s’est transformé en "emprisonnement" avec "condamnation avec sursis" et en "Expulsion".

La police a confirmé ce qui suit séparément du conducteur sur la base de l'histoire de deux des verdicts les plus coupables.
Nommé «hommes et femmes du personnel diplomatique et de l'ambassade»
Sur la base de documents tels que des contrats de travail, les Philippins avaient une «qualification de résidence».
La police préfectorale de Kanagawa a consulté l’agence de la police nationale, le parquet et le ministère des Affaires étrangères,
J'ai besoin de recevoir des explications de ces quatre personnes sur les détails du contrat et le travail réel,
Une demande a été faite à l'ambassade par l'intermédiaire du ministère des Affaires étrangères.
Cependant, comme ils ont répondu qu'ils étaient rentrés chez eux, ils ont décidé qu'il était plus probable qu'ils aient aidé à un «emploi illégal».
Et à propos des "trois diplomates" qui sont rentrés chez eux immédiatement après l'application,
Le 6 de ce mois, ils ont été accusés de soutenir la violation de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
«Envoyez les documents relatifs à une affaire (pénale) au parquet».

Je pense que vous pouvez comprendre que l’administration judiciaire japonaise est dans un «état grave».
Je demande à tout le monde. Le Japon est une puissance commerciale.
Il n’ya que le «pouvoir» de la communauté internationale pour résoudre ce problème.
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans chaque pays.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce «acte d’accusation» pour comprendre «l’erreur de la loi applicable».

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
«Application» des articles 60 et 62 du code pénal «Article de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration» concernant «les pécheurs pour soutenir d'autres crimes»
"Fou".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-08-28: Dear Sir, I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”. I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power. There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.

To President Trump


2019-08-28: Dear Sir,
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.


Part 1. A complaint to the Chiba District Court in violation
of the Immigration Control Act of the Philippines.
The beginning of the complaint is omitted.
The purpose of the accusation.
According to the morning newspaper dated February 20, 2015,
the Yomiuri Shimbun and others reported that the diplomat and staff
of the Philippine Embassy were criminalized for violation of the Immigration Control Act.

The content of the article is that the driver of the Philippine embassy officials assumed
that the Philippine person in his country was hired as a domestic servant,
handed a false employment contract to the Philippine person,
and the Philippine person applied for immigration.
Acquired the status of residence for "special activities",
but instead of working as a domestic worker, he worked for a landscaping company in Tokyo.
The driver of the embassy was arrested and prosecuted in June 2014
for a criminal law “assistance offense” for violation of immigration law
(non-qualified activities).
In the trial, it became "imprisonment" with "suspended sentence" and was "Deportation".

The police confirmed the following separately from the driver based
on the story of two of the more guilty verdicts.
The Philippine people had obtained “qualification for residence” based
on documents such as employment contracts signed
in the name of “three men and women of diplomat and embassy”.
The Kanagawa Prefectural Police, in consultation with the National Police Agency,
Public Prosecutors Office, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
requested an interview with the Embassy through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
saying that it was necessary to receive explanations
from the four people regarding the details of the contract and the actual conditions of work.
However, because they responded that they had returned home,
they decided that there was a greater possibility that they helped “illegal employment”.
The three "diplomats" who returned home immediately
after the offer made them "send the papers pertaining to a
(criminal) case to the Public Prosecutors Office" on the 6th of this month
on the suspicion of supporting the violation of the Immigration Control Act.

I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
There are many victims in each country.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ******



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

******

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 28.08.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr, Ich denke, Sie können verstehen, dass sich die japanische Justizverwaltung in einem "ernsten Zustand" befindet.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


28.08.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Ich denke, Sie können verstehen, dass sich die japanische Justizverwaltung in einem "ernsten Zustand" befindet.
Ich frage alle. Japan ist eine Handelsmacht. Es gibt nur die "Macht" der internationalen Gemeinschaft, dies zu lösen.


Teil 1. Eine Beschwerde beim Bezirksgericht Chiba unter Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz der Philippinen.
Der Beginn der Beschwerde entfällt.
Der Zweck der Anschuldigung.
Laut der Morgenzeitung vom 20. Februar 2015, wie die Yomiuri Shimbun,
Diplomaten und Beamte der philippinischen Botschaft berichteten der Öffentlichkeit, dass sie wegen Verstoßes gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz unter Strafe gestellt wurden.

Der Inhalt des Artikels ist der Fahrer der Botschaft der Philippinen,
Falsche Einstellung eines Philippiners in Ihrem Heimatland als Hausangestellter
Liefern Sie einen falschen Arbeitsvertrag an die Philippine, und die Philippine beantragt die Einwanderung,
Ich habe den Aufenthaltsstatus für "bestimmte Tätigkeiten" erhalten, aber ohne als Hausangestellter zu arbeiten.
Drei Personen wurden beschuldigt, gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz (nicht qualifizierte Tätigkeiten) verstoßen zu haben, weil sie in einem Landschaftsbauunternehmen in Tokio gearbeitet hatten.
Der Fahrer der Botschaft wurde im Juni 2014 wegen eines Straftatbestands wegen Verstoßes gegen das Einwanderungsrecht (nicht qualifizierte Tätigkeiten) festgenommen und strafrechtlich verfolgt.
Im Prozess wurde es "Inhaftierung" mit "Bewährungsstrafe" und "Abschiebung".

Die Polizei bestätigte das Folgende getrennt vom Fahrer, basierend auf der Geschichte von zwei der schuldigeren Urteile.
Benannt als "Diplomaten- und Botschaftspersonal Männer und Frauen"
Aufgrund von Dokumenten wie Arbeitsverträgen hatten die Filipinos eine „Aufenthaltsberechtigung“.
Die Präfekturpolizei Kanagawa beriet sich mit der Nationalen Polizeibehörde, der Staatsanwaltschaft und dem Außenministerium.
Ich muss von diesen vier Personen Erläuterungen zu den Einzelheiten des Vertrags und der tatsächlichen Arbeit erhalten.
Bei der Botschaft wurde ein Antrag über das Außenministerium gestellt.
Da sie jedoch geantwortet hatten, dass sie nach Hause zurückgekehrt waren, kamen sie zu dem Schluss, dass die Möglichkeit größer war, dass sie „illegaler Beschäftigung“ halfen.
Und über "drei Diplomaten", die unmittelbar nach der Bewerbung nach Hause kamen,
Am 6. dieses Monats wurden sie beschuldigt, die Verletzung des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt zu haben.
"Senden Sie die Papiere zu einem (Straf-) Fall an die Staatsanwaltschaft".

Ich denke, Sie können verstehen, dass sich die japanische Justizverwaltung in einem "ernsten Zustand" befindet.
Ich frage alle. Japan ist eine Handelsmacht.
Es gibt nur die "Macht" der internationalen Gemeinschaft, dies zu lösen.
In jedem Land gibt es viele Opfer.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
"Anwendung" der Artikel 60 und 62 "Sünder zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
"Verrückt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für die Straftat“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-08-28: Dear Sir, I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-08-28: Dear Sir,
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.


Part 1. A complaint to the Chiba District Court in violation
of the Immigration Control Act of the Philippines.
The beginning of the complaint is omitted.
The purpose of the accusation.
According to the morning newspaper dated February 20, 2015,
the Yomiuri Shimbun and others reported that the diplomat and staff
of the Philippine Embassy were criminalized for violation of the Immigration Control Act.

The content of the article is that the driver of the Philippine embassy officials assumed
that the Philippine person in his country was hired as a domestic servant,
handed a false employment contract to the Philippine person,
and the Philippine person applied for immigration.
Acquired the status of residence for "special activities",
but instead of working as a domestic worker, he worked for a landscaping company in Tokyo.
The driver of the embassy was arrested and prosecuted in June 2014
for a criminal law “assistance offense” for violation of immigration law
(non-qualified activities).
In the trial, it became "imprisonment" with "suspended sentence" and was "Deportation".

The police confirmed the following separately from the driver based
on the story of two of the more guilty verdicts.
The Philippine people had obtained “qualification for residence” based
on documents such as employment contracts signed
in the name of “three men and women of diplomat and embassy”.
The Kanagawa Prefectural Police, in consultation with the National Police Agency,
Public Prosecutors Office, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
requested an interview with the Embassy through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
saying that it was necessary to receive explanations
from the four people regarding the details of the contract and the actual conditions of work.
However, because they responded that they had returned home,
they decided that there was a greater possibility that they helped “illegal employment”.
The three "diplomats" who returned home immediately
after the offer made them "send the papers pertaining to a
(criminal) case to the Public Prosecutors Office" on the 6th of this month
on the suspicion of supporting the violation of the Immigration Control Act.

I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
There are many victims in each country.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Good morning. It is a picture of today's White House. President Trump should “co-operate” with G7 and allies! 2019-08-28: Dear Sir, I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-08-28: Dear Sir,
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.


Part 1. A complaint to the Chiba District Court in violation
of the Immigration Control Act of the Philippines.
The beginning of the complaint is omitted.
The purpose of the accusation.
According to the morning newspaper dated February 20, 2015,
the Yomiuri Shimbun and others reported that the diplomat and staff
of the Philippine Embassy were criminalized for violation of the Immigration Control Act.

The content of the article is that the driver of the Philippine embassy officials assumed
that the Philippine person in his country was hired as a domestic servant,
handed a false employment contract to the Philippine person,
and the Philippine person applied for immigration.
Acquired the status of residence for "special activities",
but instead of working as a domestic worker, he worked for a landscaping company in Tokyo.
The driver of the embassy was arrested and prosecuted in June 2014
for a criminal law “assistance offense” for violation of immigration law
(non-qualified activities).
In the trial, it became "imprisonment" with "suspended sentence" and was "Deportation".

The police confirmed the following separately from the driver based
on the story of two of the more guilty verdicts.
The Philippine people had obtained “qualification for residence” based
on documents such as employment contracts signed
in the name of “three men and women of diplomat and embassy”.
The Kanagawa Prefectural Police, in consultation with the National Police Agency,
Public Prosecutors Office, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
requested an interview with the Embassy through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
saying that it was necessary to receive explanations
from the four people regarding the details of the contract and the actual conditions of work.
However, because they responded that they had returned home,
they decided that there was a greater possibility that they helped “illegal employment”.
The three "diplomats" who returned home immediately
after the offer made them "send the papers pertaining to a
(criminal) case to the Public Prosecutors Office" on the 6th of this month
on the suspicion of supporting the violation of the Immigration Control Act.

I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
There are many victims in each country.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ****

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********************

help me Opinion 致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人 2019-08-27：亲爱的先生， 菲律宾是一个拥有1亿人口的大国。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人


2019-08-27：亲爱的先生，
菲律宾是一个拥有1亿人口的大国。
菲律宾政府官员和公民被任命为“Rodrigo Roa Duterte总统”
你应该做“请愿”。
菲律宾政府应该“请求”日本政府为菲律宾人民“追回荣誉”和“赔偿”。


第1部分。我会告诉你为什么我熟悉这件事。
因为我像外交官一样受到“惩罚”。
由于违反“移民法”第70条（不合格活动），“中国人”于2010年6月被“逮捕”。
另一方面，我因“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”而被捕，
因为它被“惩罚”了。
此外，犯罪的原因是支持“移民控制法”第22-4-（4）条。
他们将“刑法”第60条和第62条“罪人支持其他罪行”适用于行政处罚。

换句话说，对于违反“移民控制法”第70条（非合格活动）的规定，移民法第22-4条第（4）款被列为犯罪原因。
并在“刑法”第60条和第62条中适用支持其他罪行的罪行。
这是疯狂法律的逻辑。

我向检察官坚持这一点。
但检察官说：
“没有人相信你的”法律逻辑“！”

我还告诉律师。
律师无法对“合法性原则”提出“法律主张”。
换句话说，我们不会指出违反适用法律。
因此，在向最高法院提出的“上诉”中，我提出了自己的“上诉”，并提出了上述要求。

最高法院的决定是“拒绝”。
原因是上述索赔仅仅是“适用的错误”索赔，
这不是最高法院的“审议事项”。
所以你说你应该做“重审辩护”。

但是，在“刑事诉讼法”中，由于“适用法律的错误”，不能提出“再审请求”。
但是，如果警察或检察官有“犯罪”的“事实”，则可以提出“重审请求”。

警察和检察官的罪行不违反日本法律，
因为他们提出了虚假指控（请求逮捕，被起诉和起诉），这是“刑法”第172条“虚假指控”。
他们还逮捕并监禁我，并且他们在“刑法”第193条中“滥用特别公职人员的权力”。

菲律宾是一个拥有1亿人口的大国。你应该抗议日本政府。
每个国家都有许多受害者。
每个国家的政府都应该“抗议”日本政府。
我们应该寻求恢复和补偿每个国家受害者的荣誉。

我想你可以理解日本司法行政处于“严重状态”。
我问大家。日本是一个贸易大国。
只有国际社会的“力量”才能解决这个问题。
它将在明天继续。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只看这个“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）“移民控制和难民认可法”
“移民控制和难民认可法”
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法典
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“法治下的治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持第22-4-4条移民法”
“反对移民法”的“刑法”第70条和第62条
“申请”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
执行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”并不是“移民法”第70条的原因。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


请问最高领导人金正恩，*****************************************


日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。
这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”提出了关于DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该根据“自然”问题予以驳斥。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应该绑架外国人”应该“解决”。
有很多“同族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表“朝鲜半岛人民”抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“案例”。

请公布日本政府“移民法”的失实陈述
请宣布这些事情并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”有更多“外国受害者”而不是“日本绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应该在外国媒体和联合国公布。
朝鲜政府应该特别披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的资料 ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名字Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如有任何问题，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-08-27: Dear Sir, The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.

To President Trump


2019-08-27: Dear Sir,
The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.
Philippine government officials
and citizens should “petition” the “President Rodrigo Roa Duterte”.
The Philippine government should “request” the Japanese government for “recovery of honor”
and “compensation” for the people of the Philippines.


Part 1. I will tell you why I am familiar with this matter.
Because I was "punished" like a diplomat.
The “Chinese” was “arrested” in June 2010 for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Act
(non-qualified activities).
On the other hand, I was arrested and "punished" for "crimes to support other crimes"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
Moreover, the reason for the crime is the fact of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
They applied the Criminal Code Article 60 and 62 “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”
to administrative punishment.

In other words, for the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
 (non-qualified activities), the immigration law Article 22-4- (4) is stated as the reason
 for the crime. And apply the crimes that support other crimes
 in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
This is the logic of crazy law.

I insisted this on the prosecutor.
But the prosecutor says:
"No one believes in your" logic of law "!"

I also told lawyers.
Lawyers are not capable of making “legal claims” of “legality principle”.
In other words, we will not point out that the applicable law is violated.
So in the “appeal” to the Supreme Court, I made my own “appeal” and made the above claims.

The decision of the Supreme Court is “Rejection”.
The reason is that the above claim is merely an "incorrect application law" claim
and is not "the matter to be deliberated" by the Supreme Court
under the provisions of the "Criminal Procedure Law".
So you say you should do “retrial plea”.

However, in the “Criminal Procedure Law”,
“request for retrial” cannot be made for the reason of “error of applicable law”.
However, if a police officer or prosecutor has a “fact” of “crime”,
a “request for retrial” can be made.

The criminal facts of police officers and prosecutors have not violated any Japanese law,
but they have made false charges (requests for arrest, transmission and prosecution),
so they are Article 172 "False accusation" of the Penal Code.
They also arrested and imprisoned me, and they were “abuse of authority
by special public officer” in Article 193 of the Penal Code.

The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.
You should protest against the Japanese government.
There are many victims in each country.
Governments in each country should “protest” the Japanese government.
And we should seek the restoration and compensation of the honor of victims in each country.

I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ******



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

******

help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-08-27: Monsieur, Les Philippines sont un grand pays avec une population de 100 millions d’habitants.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-08-27: Monsieur,
Les Philippines sont un grand pays avec une population de 100 millions d’habitants.
Des responsables du gouvernement philippin et des citoyens nommés «président Rodrigo Roa Duterte»
Vous devriez faire une «pétition».
Le gouvernement philippin devrait «demander» au gouvernement japonais de «récupérer son honneur» et de «dédommager» le peuple philippin.


Partie 1 Je vais vous dire pourquoi je suis au courant de cette affaire.
Parce que j'étais "puni" comme un diplomate.
Le «Chinois» a été «arrêté» en juin 2010 pour violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration (activités non qualifiées).
En revanche, j'ai été arrêté pour "crime à l'appui d'autres crimes" aux articles 60 et 62 du code pénal,
Et parce que c'était «puni».
De plus, la raison du crime est le fait de soutenir l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Ils appliquaient les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal «Les pécheurs pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux sanctions administratives.

En d'autres termes, en cas de violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration (activités non qualifiées), l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration est indiqué comme le motif du crime.
Et appliquez les crimes qui soutiennent d'autres crimes aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal.
C'est la logique de la loi folle.

J'ai insisté auprès du procureur.
Mais le procureur dit:
"Personne ne croit en votre" logique du droit "!"

J'ai aussi dit aux avocats.
Les avocats ne sont pas en mesure de faire des «réclamations juridiques» du «principe de légalité».
En d'autres termes, nous ne soulignerons pas que la loi applicable est violée.
Ainsi, lors du «recours» devant la Cour suprême, j'ai fait mon propre «recours» et formulé les demandes susmentionnées.

La décision de la Cour suprême est un «rejet».
La raison en est que la revendication ci-dessus est simplement une revendication "d'erreur applicable",
Ce n'est pas le «sujet de délibération» de la Cour suprême.
Donc, vous dites que vous devriez faire «un nouvel appel».

Toutefois, dans le «Code de procédure pénale», une «demande de réexamen» ne peut être invoquée pour des raisons «d'erreur de droit applicable».
Cependant, si un officier de police ou un procureur a un «fait» de «crime», une «demande de nouveau procès» peut être faite.

Les crimes commis par des policiers et des procureurs ne sont pas contraires à la loi japonaise,
Parce qu'ils ont formulé de fausses accusations (demandes d'arrestation, poursuites et poursuites), ils constituent l'article 172 "Fausse accusation" du Code pénal.
Ils m'ont également arrêté et emprisonné. Ils constituaient un «abus d'autorité de la part d'un officier public spécial» au sens de l'article 193 du Code pénal.

Les Philippines sont un grand pays avec une population de 100 millions d’habitants. Vous devriez protester contre le gouvernement japonais.
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans chaque pays.
Les gouvernements de chaque pays devraient «protester» contre le gouvernement japonais.
Et nous devrions chercher à rétablir et à indemniser l’honneur des victimes dans chaque pays.

Je pense que vous pouvez comprendre que l’administration judiciaire japonaise est dans un «état grave».
Je demande à tout le monde. Le Japon est une puissance commerciale.
Il n’ya que le «pouvoir» de la communauté internationale pour résoudre ce problème.
Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 70 et 62 du Code pénal contre la loi sur l'immigration 70
"Appliquer" est "fou".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 27.08.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr, Die Philippinen sind ein großes Land mit 100 Millionen Einwohnern.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


27.08.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Die Philippinen sind ein großes Land mit 100 Millionen Einwohnern.
Philippinische Regierungsbeamte und Bürger werden zum Präsidenten von Rodrigo Roa Duterte ernannt
Sie sollten "Petition" tun.
Die philippinische Regierung sollte die japanische Regierung auffordern, die Ehre zurückzugewinnen und die philippinische Bevölkerung zu entschädigen.


Teil 1. Ich werde Ihnen sagen, warum ich mit dieser Angelegenheit vertraut bin.
Weil ich wie ein Diplomat "bestraft" wurde.
Die „Chinesen“ wurden im Juni 2010 wegen Verstoßes gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes (nicht qualifizierte Aktivitäten) „verhaftet“.
Andererseits wurde ich wegen "Verbrechens zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches verhaftet.
Und weil es "bestraft" wurde.
Der Grund für die Straftat ist außerdem die Tatsache, dass Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt wird.
Sie wandten die Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches „Sünder zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten“ auf die Bestrafung durch die Verwaltung an.

Mit anderen Worten, für die Verletzung von Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes (nicht qualifizierte Tätigkeiten) wird der Grund für die Straftat in Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes angegeben.
Und wenden Sie die Verbrechen an, die andere Verbrechen in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs unterstützen.
Das ist die Logik des verrückten Gesetzes.

Ich habe darauf beim Staatsanwalt bestanden.
Aber der Staatsanwalt sagt:
"Niemand glaubt an Ihre" Logik des Gesetzes "!"

Ich erzählte auch Anwälten.
Rechtsanwälte sind nicht in der Lage, "Rechtsansprüche" nach dem "Legalitätsprinzip" geltend zu machen.
Mit anderen Worten, wir werden nicht darauf hinweisen, dass das anwendbare Recht verletzt wird.
In der "Berufung" vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof habe ich meine eigene "Berufung" eingelegt und die obigen Behauptungen aufgestellt.

Die Entscheidung des Obersten Gerichtshofs lautet „Ablehnung“.
Der Grund dafür ist, dass die vorstehende Behauptung lediglich eine "anwendbare Fehler" -Antwort ist.
Es ist nicht die „Sache der Überlegung“ des Obersten Gerichtshofs.
Sie sagen also, Sie sollten einen erneuten Rechtsbehelf einlegen.

Im "Strafprozessrecht" kann "Antrag auf Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens" jedoch nicht gestellt werden, da "ein Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts vorliegt".
Wenn jedoch ein Polizist oder Staatsanwalt eine "Tat" hat, kann ein "Antrag auf Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens" gestellt werden.

Die Verbrechen von Polizisten und Staatsanwälten verstoßen nicht gegen japanisches Recht.
Da sie falsche Anschuldigungen erhoben haben (Verhaftungsersuchen, zur Verfolgung und Verfolgung geschickt), handelt es sich bei ihnen um Artikel 172 "Falscher Vorwurf" des Strafgesetzbuches.
Sie nahmen mich auch fest und sperrten mich ein, und sie handelten sich in Artikel 193 des Strafgesetzbuches um einen "Amtsmissbrauch durch einen besonderen Beamten".

Die Philippinen sind ein großes Land mit 100 Millionen Einwohnern. Sie sollten gegen die japanische Regierung protestieren.
In jedem Land gibt es viele Opfer.
Regierungen in jedem Land sollten gegen die japanische Regierung „protestieren“.
Und wir sollten die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der Ehre der Opfer in jedem Land anstreben.

Ich denke, Sie können verstehen, dass sich die japanische Justizverwaltung in einem "ernsten Zustand" befindet.
Ich frage alle. Japan ist eine Handelsmacht.
Es gibt nur die "Macht" der internationalen Gemeinschaft, dies zu lösen.
Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 70 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz 70
"Bewerben" ist "verrückt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für die Straftat“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-08-27: Dear Sir, The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-08-27: Dear Sir,
The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.
Philippine government officials
and citizens should “petition” the “President Rodrigo Roa Duterte”.
The Philippine government should “request” the Japanese government for “recovery of honor”
and “compensation” for the people of the Philippines.


Part 1. I will tell you why I am familiar with this matter.
Because I was "punished" like a diplomat.
The “Chinese” was “arrested” in June 2010 for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Act
(non-qualified activities).
On the other hand, I was arrested and "punished" for "crimes to support other crimes"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
Moreover, the reason for the crime is the fact of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
They applied the Criminal Code Article 60 and 62 “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”
to administrative punishment.

In other words, for the violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
 (non-qualified activities), the immigration law Article 22-4- (4) is stated as the reason
 for the crime. And apply the crimes that support other crimes
 in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
This is the logic of crazy law.

I insisted this on the prosecutor.
But the prosecutor says:
"No one believes in your" logic of law "!"

I also told lawyers.
Lawyers are not capable of making “legal claims” of “legality principle”.
In other words, we will not point out that the applicable law is violated.
So in the “appeal” to the Supreme Court, I made my own “appeal” and made the above claims.

The decision of the Supreme Court is “Rejection”.
The reason is that the above claim is merely an "incorrect application law" claim
and is not "the matter to be deliberated" by the Supreme Court
under the provisions of the "Criminal Procedure Law".
So you say you should do “retrial plea”.

However, in the “Criminal Procedure Law”,
“request for retrial” cannot be made for the reason of “error of applicable law”.
However, if a police officer or prosecutor has a “fact” of “crime”,
a “request for retrial” can be made.

The criminal facts of police officers and prosecutors have not violated any Japanese law,
but they have made false charges (requests for arrest, transmission and prosecution),
so they are Article 172 "False accusation" of the Penal Code.
They also arrested and imprisoned me, and they were “abuse of authority
by special public officer” in Article 193 of the Penal Code.

The Philippines is a big country with a population of 100 million.
You should protest against the Japanese government.
There are many victims in each country.
Governments in each country should “protest” the Japanese government.
And we should seek the restoration and compensation of the honor of victims in each country.

I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp