help me Opinion To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-09-18: Dear Sir, Explain to the "Advisor Lawyer" of the "Former Democratic Party". I explain, “The reason for the bill of indictment's crime is to claim Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act, but this is not a crime.”

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-09-18: Dear Sir,
Explain to the "Advisor Lawyer" of the "Former Democratic Party".
I explain, “The reason for the bill of indictment's crime is to claim Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act, but this is not a crime.”
However, he showed Article 64 of the Penal Code,
and “The principal offender is imprisonment, so Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code are“ consisting ”.
He can't answer. Please understand the skills of Japanese lawyers.
Everyone in the world! Please help!


Part 1. “Criminal facts” in Article 172 “Crimes of False Complaints”
by the “Police Officers”.
Around June 2004. Filipinos were working in “non-qualified activities”
at “landscaping companies” in Tokyo.

Police officers will not arrest “employers” who hired the Philippines illegally
for “Depending on emotion” on immigration 73-2 “Since promoting illegal employment”.

However, police officers arrested
only Filipinos for immigration law Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.

Police officers who wanted "big achievements" illegally abused their authority.
"Illegal labor" due to "out-of-qualification activities" is an incident that occurs every day.
Many are sent to “immigration facilities”. And “forced repatriation”.
They made a “special response” to Filipinos who violated the Immigration Act Article 70.
It was "planned" to strictly imprisonment in Article 70 "Unqualified Activities"
of the Immigration Control Act.
To this end, in order not to violate international law,
an employer who is a supporter of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act must be punished by Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
“A Crime Promoting Unlawful Employment”.
However, because they do not want to punish employers
for “Depending on emotion”, they have made “Third Party” a “Supporter”.

“Third party” is a “supporter” of “Cancellation of status of residence”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act,
but police officers pretend “the name of sin”.
As a "supporter" of Article 70 "Unqualified Activities"
of the Immigration Control Act, he was a criminal with a "lie false name".
“Third Party” is the Philippine Embassy staff (driver) or diplomat.

“Falsified content” has changed “supporter”
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Control Act,
which is not a crime, to “supporter” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

1) The Filipinos received "provided" from the embassy staff (driver)
of "documents of false employment contracts".
2) Therefore, the Philippine people were able to obtain “resident status”.
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) Since the Philippine people were able to stay in Japan,
they were able to do “illegal labor”.

In such a scenario, he was designated as a “supporter”
for Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Control Act.

The embassy staff (driver) was subsequently arrested
and "sent to prosecutors" as "supporter" in Article 70 "Unqualified Activities"
of the Immigration Control Act.
Crime name is Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.

The general public and foreigners abuse the fact that they do not understand the law.

The act of support in the Immigration Act 22-4- (4), which is not guilty,
has been replaced with “Sin of Support” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

Much of the work of Japanese lawyers is "civil lawsuits".
There are only a few lawyers who understand immigration law in Japan.
So I think that the “Advisor Lawyer” at the Embassy
of the Philippines does not know the immigration law.

Defending without investigating the law is a violation of attorney law.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ******

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

**********************

help me Opinion 金正恩的最高领导人。 2019-09-17：亲爱的先生， 日本的黑暗是律师不审查法律。 我们要求律师提供“移民法”，因为“逮捕违反了适用法律”。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。


2019-09-17：亲爱的先生，
日本的黑暗是律师不审查法律。
我们要求律师提供“移民法”，因为“逮捕违反了适用法律”。
我收到了司法部的“部长条例”，而不是“移民法”。
当我告诉律师“移民法”第22-4-（4）条时，他说：“没有必要说”程序理论“。
他们“假装知道”法律。


第1部分。 “菲律宾人”做过“不合格的工作”，受到“移民法”第70条的约束
他因“非法非法劳工”而受到惩罚。
但是，雇主不受“移民法”第73-2条的惩罚。

然而，检察官采取了大胆的非法行为。
检方对第三方进行了处罚，他们向菲律宾提供了“虚假劳动合同文件”。
第三方是菲律宾使馆工作人员和外交官。

“罪名”是“刑法典”第60和62条中“支持其他罪行的罪”。

“起诉书”罪的原因是“支持”移民法22-4-（4）的原因。
支持移民法22-4-（4）的外国人受到司法部长的行政制裁。
有行政处置
1）“取消居留身份”。
2）“强行离开这个国家”。

由于“犯罪理由”是对移民法22-4-（4）的支持，因此不能适用“刑法”第60条和第62条。

移民法24-4-（4）法案“取消居留身份”
“支持法”与“移民管制法”第70条无关。
检察官要求适用“刑法”第60条和第62条是犯罪名称为假的非法行为。

“三个菲律宾人”
由于“移民法”第24-4-（4）条中“取消居留身份”的原因，他甚至没有收到“司法部长的处置”。

移民法的目的，法律面前人人平等，以及不违反国际法的行为如下。
非法雇用菲律宾人的雇主不会受到移民法的“刑事处罚”。
这就是为什么非法工作的菲律宾人必须说“不要惩罚”。

我非法逮捕了菲律宾人，并以非法手段挤压了决策自由。
逮捕和监禁不是“只是疏忽”，而是“犯罪”“故意”犯罪活动。

“犯罪名称”是第194条“特别公职人员滥用职权”。
它将在明天继续。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只看这个“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。


请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）“移民控制和难民认可法”
“移民控制和难民认可法”
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法典
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“依法治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决它。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持移民法第22-4-4条”
“刑法典”第60条和第62条对“移民管制法”第70条“适用”“支持其他罪行的犯罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
执行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与“移民法”第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


请问最高领导人金正恩，*****************************************


日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。
这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”提出了关于DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该根据“自然”问题予以驳斥。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应该绑架外国人”应该“解决”。
有很多“同族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表“朝鲜半岛人民”抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“案例”。

请公布日本政府“移民法”的失实陈述。
请宣布这些事情并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”有更多“外国受害者”而不是“日本绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应该在外国媒体和联合国公布。
朝鲜政府应该特别披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的资料 ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名字Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如有任何问题，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-09-17: Dear Sir, The darkness of Japan is that lawyers do not examine the law. We ask lawyers to deliver “immigration law” because “Arrest is a violation of applicable law”.

To President Trump


2019-09-17: Dear Sir,
The darkness of Japan is that lawyers do not examine the law.
We ask lawyers to deliver “immigration law”
because “Arrest is a violation of applicable law”.
I received the "Ministerial Ordinance" of the Ministry of Justice,
not the "Immigration Law". When I tell the lawyer Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Law,
he says, “There is no point in saying“ procedure theory ”.
They “pretend to know” the law.

Part 1. “Filipinos” who did “unqualified labor” were punished
by the Immigration Act Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
However, employers are not punished by Immigration Act Article 73-2.

However, the prosecutor took a bold illegal act.
The prosecution punished a third party who “provided” the Philippines
with “documents of false employment contracts”.
The third party is the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomat.

“Sin name” is “Sin for supporting other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.

The reason for the crime of “bill of indictment” is the reason
for “supporting” immigration law 22-4- (4).
Foreigners who support Immigration Law 22-4- (4) are subject to administrative sanctions
by the Minister of Justice.
With administrative disposal
1) “Cancellation of status of residence”.
2) “Forcibly leaving the country”.

Since "reason for crime" is support of Immigration Law 22-4- (4),
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied.

Immigration Act 24-4- (4) "Activity to support" the act
of "Cancellation of Status of Residence" is not related to Immigration Act Article 70.
The application of Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code requested
by the prosecutor is an illegal act with Crime name being false.

None of the “three Filipinos” have even been “disposed of deportation”
by the Minister of Justice for reasons of “Revocation of Status of Residence”
in Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

The purpose of immigration law, equality under the law,
and in order not to violate international law are as follows.
Employers who hired Philippine people illegally are not “criminally punished”
by immigration law.
That's why Filipinos who worked illegally must say "do not punish".

Arrest and confinement, where only the Filipinos are illegally arrested
and pressure the freedom of decision-making by illegal means,
is a criminal act of “malignant” and “intentional” rather than “mere fault”.

“Crime name” is the article 194 “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only,
but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ********



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********

help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-09-17: Monsieur,La noirceur du Japon est que les avocats n'examinent pas la loi. Nous demandons aux avocats de «respecter le droit de l'immigration» car «l'arrestation est une violation du droit applicable».

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-09-17: Monsieur,
La noirceur du Japon est que les avocats n'examinent pas la loi.
Nous demandons aux avocats de «respecter le droit de l'immigration» car «l'arrestation est une violation du droit applicable».
J'ai reçu "l'ordonnance ministérielle" du ministère de la Justice, pas la "loi sur l'immigration".
Quand je dis à l'avocat l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration, il dit: «Inutile de dire« théorie de la procédure ».
Ils "prétendent connaître" la loi.


Partie 1 Les "Philippins" qui effectuaient un "travail non qualifié" étaient traités dans la loi sur l'immigration, article 70
Il est puni pour «travail illégal illégal».
Cependant, les employeurs ne sont pas punis par l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Cependant, le procureur a commis un acte illégal audacieux.
L’accusation a puni un tiers qui avait «fourni» aux Philippines des «documents de faux contrats de travail».
La troisième partie est le personnel et diplomate de l'ambassade des Philippines.

Le «nom du péché» est un «péché pour avoir soutenu d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal.

Le motif de l'acte d'accusation est le motif du soutien de la loi sur l'immigration 22-4- (4).
Les étrangers qui soutiennent la loi sur l'immigration 22-4- (4) sont passibles de sanctions administratives de la part du ministre de la Justice.
Avec élimination administrative
1) «Annulation du statut de résidence».
2) «Quitter de force le pays».

Étant donné que le "motif du crime" est un soutien de la loi sur l'immigration 22-4- (4), les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal ne peuvent pas être appliqués.

Loi sur l'immigration 24-4- (4) de la loi «Annulation du statut de résidence»
L '«acte d'accompagnement» n'est pas lié à l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
L'application des articles 60 et 62 du code pénal demandée par le procureur est un acte illégal dont le nom est “faux”.

«Trois philippins»
Il n'a même pas reçu "la décision du ministre de la Justice" pour "l'annulation du statut de résidence" prévue à l'article 24-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.

Les objectifs de la loi sur l’immigration, l’égalité devant la loi et la non-violation du droit international sont les suivants.
Les employeurs qui ont embauché des Philippins illégalement ne sont pas «punis pénalement» par la loi sur l'immigration.
C'est pourquoi les Philippins qui ont travaillé illégalement doivent dire "ne punissez pas".

J'ai arrêté seulement des Philippins illégalement et serré la liberté de décision par des moyens illégaux.
Arrestation et séquestration ne constituent pas une «simple négligence» mais une activité criminelle «criminelle» «intentionnelle».

Le «nom de crime» est l'article 194 «Abus de pouvoir d'un officier public spécial».
Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".


Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "soutien de l'article 22-4-4 loi sur l'immigration"
Il est «fou» d’appliquer le «crime pour soutenir d’autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 17.09.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr, Die Dunkelheit in Japan ist, dass Anwälte das Gesetz nicht untersuchen.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


17.09.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Die Dunkelheit in Japan ist, dass Anwälte das Gesetz nicht untersuchen.
Wir fordern Anwälte auf, das „Einwanderungsgesetz“ zu erlassen, da „Festnahme einen Verstoß gegen geltendes Recht darstellt“.
Ich habe die "Ministerialverordnung" des Justizministeriums erhalten, nicht das "Einwanderungsgesetz".
Wenn ich dem Anwalt Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes sage, sagt er: „Es hat keinen Sinn,„ Verfahrenstheorie “zu sagen.
Sie geben vor, das Gesetz zu kennen.


Teil 1. "Filipinos", die "unqualifizierte Arbeit" verrichteten, wurden gemäß Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes behandelt
Er wird für "rechtswidrige illegale Arbeit" bestraft.
Arbeitgeber werden jedoch nicht durch Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes bestraft.

Die Staatsanwaltschaft unternahm jedoch eine mutige illegale Handlung.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft bestrafte einen Dritten, der die Philippinen mit "Dokumenten falscher Arbeitsverträge" "versah".
Die dritte Partei ist das Personal und der Diplomat der philippinischen Botschaft.

„Name der Sünde“ ist in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs „Sünde zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten“.

Der Grund für das Verbrechen der "Anklageschrift" ist der Grund für die "Unterstützung" des Einwanderungsgesetzes 22-4- (4).
Ausländer, die das Einwanderungsgesetz 22-4- (4) unterstützen, werden vom Justizminister verwaltungsrechtlich sanktioniert.
Mit administrativer Entsorgung
1) "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus".
2) "Das Land gewaltsam verlassen".

Da "Grund für die Straftat" die Unterstützung des Einwanderungsgesetzes 22-4- (4) ist, können die Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches nicht angewendet werden.

Einwanderungsgesetz 24-4- (4) Gesetz „Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus“
„Unterstützungsgesetz“ bezieht sich nicht auf Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
Die vom Staatsanwalt verlangte Anwendung der Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches ist eine rechtswidrige Handlung, bei der der Name des Verbrechens falsch ist.

"Drei Filipinos"
Er hat aus Gründen der "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" in Artikel 24-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes nicht einmal "Verfügungen des Justizministers" erhalten.

Der Zweck des Einwanderungsrechts, die Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz und um nicht gegen das Völkerrecht zu verstoßen, sind wie folgt.
Arbeitgeber, die illegal philippinische Leute eingestellt haben, werden vom Einwanderungsgesetz nicht „strafrechtlich bestraft“.
Deshalb müssen Filipinos, die illegal gearbeitet haben, sagen "Nicht bestrafen".

Ich habe nur Filipinos illegal verhaftet und die Entscheidungsfreiheit mit illegalen Mitteln eingeschränkt.
Verhaftung und Inhaftierung sind nicht „nur Fahrlässigkeit“, sondern „kriminelle“ „vorsätzliche“ kriminelle Handlungen.

"Name des Verbrechens" ist der Artikel 194 "Missbrauch der Autorität durch einen speziellen Beamten".
Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.


Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Es ist "verrückt", das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" in Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "anzuwenden".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes ist für Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes nicht ursächlich.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-09-17: he says, “There is no point in saying“ procedure theory ”. They “pretend to know” the law.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-09-17: Dear Sir,
The darkness of Japan is that lawyers do not examine the law.
We ask lawyers to deliver “immigration law”
because “Arrest is a violation of applicable law”.
I received the "Ministerial Ordinance" of the Ministry of Justice,
not the "Immigration Law". When I tell the lawyer Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Law,
he says, “There is no point in saying“ procedure theory ”.
They “pretend to know” the law.

Part 1. “Filipinos” who did “unqualified labor” were punished
by the Immigration Act Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
However, employers are not punished by Immigration Act Article 73-2.

However, the prosecutor took a bold illegal act.
The prosecution punished a third party who “provided” the Philippines
with “documents of false employment contracts”.
The third party is the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomat.

“Sin name” is “Sin for supporting other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.

The reason for the crime of “bill of indictment” is the reason
for “supporting” immigration law 22-4- (4).
Foreigners who support Immigration Law 22-4- (4) are subject to administrative sanctions
by the Minister of Justice.
With administrative disposal
1) “Cancellation of status of residence”.
2) “Forcibly leaving the country”.

Since "reason for crime" is support of Immigration Law 22-4- (4),
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied.

Immigration Act 24-4- (4) "Activity to support" the act
of "Cancellation of Status of Residence" is not related to Immigration Act Article 70.
The application of Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code requested
by the prosecutor is an illegal act with Crime name being false.

None of the “three Filipinos” have even been “disposed of deportation”
by the Minister of Justice for reasons of “Revocation of Status of Residence”
in Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

The purpose of immigration law, equality under the law,
and in order not to violate international law are as follows.
Employers who hired Philippine people illegally are not “criminally punished”
by immigration law.
That's why Filipinos who worked illegally must say "do not punish".

Arrest and confinement, where only the Filipinos are illegally arrested
and pressure the freedom of decision-making by illegal means,
is a criminal act of “malignant” and “intentional” rather than “mere fault”.

“Crime name” is the article 194 “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only,
but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To everyone in the world's media 2019-09-17: Dear Sir, The darkness of Japan is that lawyers do not examine the law. We ask lawyers to deliver “immigration law” because “Arrest is a violation of applicable law”.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-09-17: Dear Sir,
The darkness of Japan is that lawyers do not examine the law.
We ask lawyers to deliver “immigration law”
because “Arrest is a violation of applicable law”.
I received the "Ministerial Ordinance" of the Ministry of Justice,
not the "Immigration Law". When I tell the lawyer Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Law,
he says, “There is no point in saying“ procedure theory ”.
They “pretend to know” the law.

Part 1. “Filipinos” who did “unqualified labor” were punished
by the Immigration Act Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
However, employers are not punished by Immigration Act Article 73-2.

However, the prosecutor took a bold illegal act.
The prosecution punished a third party who “provided” the Philippines
with “documents of false employment contracts”.
The third party is the Philippine Embassy staff and diplomat.

“Sin name” is “Sin for supporting other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.

The reason for the crime of “bill of indictment” is the reason
for “supporting” immigration law 22-4- (4).
Foreigners who support Immigration Law 22-4- (4) are subject to administrative sanctions
by the Minister of Justice.
With administrative disposal
1) “Cancellation of status of residence”.
2) “Forcibly leaving the country”.

Since "reason for crime" is support of Immigration Law 22-4- (4),
Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied.

Immigration Act 24-4- (4) "Activity to support" the act
of "Cancellation of Status of Residence" is not related to Immigration Act Article 70.
The application of Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code requested
by the prosecutor is an illegal act with Crime name being false.

None of the “three Filipinos” have even been “disposed of deportation”
by the Minister of Justice for reasons of “Revocation of Status of Residence”
in Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

The purpose of immigration law, equality under the law,
and in order not to violate international law are as follows.
Employers who hired Philippine people illegally are not “criminally punished”
by immigration law.
That's why Filipinos who worked illegally must say "do not punish".

Arrest and confinement, where only the Filipinos are illegally arrested
and pressure the freedom of decision-making by illegal means,
is a criminal act of “malignant” and “intentional” rather than “mere fault”.

“Crime name” is the article 194 “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only,
but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ******

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion 金正恩的最高领导人。 2019-09-16：亲爱的先生， “移民违规案”的黑暗是严重的。移民法每年都会修订。 议员们最了解“移民法”的“目的”和修正案。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。


2019-09-16：亲爱的先生，
“移民违规案”的黑暗是严重的。移民法每年都会修订。
议员们最了解“移民法”的“目的”和修正案。
但实际上，立法者并不理解。此外，律师不了解移民法。
可能日本只有少数律师了解移民法。
这导致非法“起诉”和非法“审判”。
这是“日本司法制度”的“实际情况”。请大家帮忙。


第1部分。描述罪的假名。
以下情景是“移民管制法”第70条“不合格活动”中“援助犯罪”的“因果关系”。
1）菲律宾人民收到菲律宾使馆工作人员“提供”的“虚假劳动合同”。
这意味着我们已获得移民法第22-4-（4）条的支持。
2）因此，菲律宾人民通过向移民局提交“就业合同”，获得了“居民身份”。
他们说他们违反了移民局22-4-（4）。
3）所以菲律宾能够留在日本。
4）因此，菲律宾人民能够违反“移民法”第70条。

这不是“移民法”第70条“非法劳工罪”的因果罪。

这是“移民法”第22-4-4条
这是违反“提交虚假文件和获得居住身份”的行为与支持行为之间的因果关系。

违反“移民控制法”第22-4-4条的行为将由司法部长处理。
1）取消居留身份。
2）强行从海外搬迁。

随着2010年的修订，“支持者”已经成为“同样的待遇”。

说出来供参考。
即使您提交虚假文件并获得“居民身份”，
如果您在“居民身份”范围内工作，则不会违反“移民控制法”第70条。

因此，菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官完全是无辜的。

导致菲律宾人民违反“移民法”第70条的因果关系是因为有雇主雇用他们。
因此，“移民法”在第73-2条中惩罚了雇主。
但检方无视雇主。

也可以只惩罚菲律宾人而不惩罚作为非法劳工主要原因的雇主。
根据法律，这是非法的“不平等”。
它也违反了国际法，因为它只是“故意”惩罚菲律宾人。
这就是为什么非法工作的菲律宾人也是无辜的。

它将在明天继续。

请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只看这个“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。


请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）“移民控制和难民认可法”
“移民控制和难民认可法”
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法典
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“依法治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决它。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持移民法第22-4-4条”
“刑法”第60条和第62条，反对“入境管制法”第70条
“应用”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
执行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与“移民法”第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


请问最高领导人金正恩，*****************************************


日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。
这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”提出了关于DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该根据“自然”问题予以驳斥。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应该绑架外国人”应该“解决”。
有很多“同族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表“朝鲜半岛人民”抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“案例”。

请公布日本政府“移民法”的失实陈述。
请宣布这些事情并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”有更多“外国受害者”而不是“日本绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应该在外国媒体和联合国公布。
朝鲜政府应该特别披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的资料 ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名字Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如有任何问题，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-09-16: Dear Sir, The darkness of the “Immigration Violation Case” is serious. Immigration law is revised every year. Parliamentarians know the “purpose” of the Immigration Act and amendments most.

To President Trump


2019-09-16: Dear Sir,
The darkness of the “Immigration Violation Case” is serious.
Immigration law is revised every year.
Parliamentarians know the “purpose” of the Immigration Act and amendments most.
But in reality, legislators don't understand.
In addition, lawyers do not understand immigration law.
Probably there are only a few lawyers in Japan who understand immigration law.
This leads to illegal “indictment” and illegal “trial”.
This is the “actual situation” of “Japanese judicial system”.
Please help everyone.


Part 1. Describes the false name of the sin.
The following scenario is the “causal relationship”
for “Assistance crime” in Article 70 “Unqualified Activities”
of the Immigration Control Act.
1) The Philippine people received a "false employment contract" "provided"
from the Philippine Embassy staff.
This means that we have received support from Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law.
2) Therefore, the Philippine people were able to obtain “Resident Status”
by submitting their “employment contract” to immigration.
They are saying that they committed the violation of Immigration 22-4- (4).
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to violate the Immigration Act Article 70.

This is not a causal offense of the Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor Sin”.

This is the causal relationship between the act
of violating the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submitting false documents
and obtaining status of residence” and the support act.

The violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act will be handled as follows
by the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) Forced removal from overseas.

With the 2010 revision, “supporters” have become “same treatment”.

Say it for reference.
Even if you submit a false document and obtain "Residence Status",
it does not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
if you work within the "Resident Status".

Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are therefore completely innocent.

The causal relationship that caused the Philippine people to violate Article 70
of the Immigration Law was because there were employers who hired them.
So the Immigration Act punishes employers in Article 73-2.
But the prosecution is acquitting the employer.

Also, it is illegal "not equal under the law" to punish
only Filipinos without punishing the employer who is the main cause of unlawful labor.
It also violates international law because it punishes only Filipinos “intentionally”.
That's why Philippines who worked illegally are also innocent.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70

of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ********



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********

help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-09-16: Monsieur, L’obscurité de «l’affaire de violation de l’immigration» est grave. La loi sur l'immigration est révisée chaque année. Les parlementaires connaissent le «but» de la loi sur l'immigration et de ses amendements.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-09-16: Monsieur,
L’obscurité de «l’affaire de violation de l’immigration» est grave. La loi sur l'immigration est révisée chaque année.
Les parlementaires connaissent le «but» de la loi sur l'immigration et de ses amendements.
Mais en réalité, les législateurs ne comprennent pas. De plus, les avocats ne comprennent pas le droit de l'immigration.
Il n’ya probablement que peu d’avocats au Japon qui comprennent le droit de l’immigration.
Cela conduit à une «mise en accusation» et à un «procès» illégaux.
Telle est la "situation actuelle" du "système judiciaire japonais". S'il vous plaît aider tout le monde.


Partie 1 Décrit le faux nom du péché.
Le scénario suivant est le «lien de causalité» pour «crime d'assistance» à l'article 70 «Activités non qualifiées» de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
1) Le peuple philippin a reçu un "faux contrat de travail" "fourni" par le personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines.
Cela signifie que nous avons reçu le soutien de l’article 22-4- (4) du droit de l’immigration.
2) Par conséquent, les Philippins ont pu obtenir le «statut de résident» en soumettant leur «contrat de travail» à l'immigration.
Ils disent qu'ils ont commis la violation d'Immigration 22-4- (4).
3) Les Philippines ont donc pu rester au Japon.
4) Le peuple philippin a donc pu violer l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.

Ce n'est pas un délit de causalité de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration “Pacte de travail illégal”.

Ceci est l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il s'agit d'un lien de causalité entre l'acte de violer "la présentation de faux documents et l'obtention du statut de résident" et l'acte de soutien.

La violation de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration sera traitée comme suit par le ministre de la Justice.
1) Annulation du statut de résidence.
2) renvoi forcé d'outre-mer.

Avec la révision de 2010, les "supporters" sont devenus "le même traitement".

Dites-le pour référence.
Même si vous soumettez un faux document et obtenez un "statut de résident",
Si vous travaillez dans le cadre du "statut de résident", vous ne violerez pas l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Les diplomates et les ambassades philippines sont donc totalement innocents.

Le lien de causalité qui a amené le peuple philippin à violer l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration est dû au fait que certains employeurs les ont embauchés.
La loi sur l'immigration punit donc les employeurs à l'article 73-2.
Mais l'accusation acquitte l'employeur.

Il est également possible de ne punir que les Philippins sans punir l'employeur qui est la principale cause du travail illégal.
Il est illégal "pas égal devant la loi".
Elle viole également le droit international car elle ne punit que les Philippins «intentionnellement».
C'est pourquoi les Philippines qui ont travaillé illégalement sont également innocentes.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".


Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "soutien de l'article 22-4-4 loi sur l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-09-16: Sehr geehrter Herr, Die Dunkelheit des "Immigration Violation Case" ist ernst. Das Einwanderungsgesetz wird jedes Jahr überarbeitet.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-09-16: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Die Dunkelheit des "Immigration Violation Case" ist ernst. Das Einwanderungsgesetz wird jedes Jahr überarbeitet.
Parlamentarier kennen den „Zweck“ des Einwanderungsgesetzes und dessen Änderungen am meisten.
Aber in Wirklichkeit verstehen Gesetzgeber nicht. Darüber hinaus verstehen Anwälte das Einwanderungsrecht nicht.
Wahrscheinlich gibt es in Japan nur wenige Anwälte, die das Einwanderungsrecht verstehen.
Dies führt zu einer illegalen "Anklage" und einem illegalen "Prozess".
Dies ist die "aktuelle Situation" des "japanischen Justizsystems". Bitte helfen Sie allen.


Teil 1. Beschreibt den falschen Namen der Sünde.
Das folgende Szenario ist der „Kausalzusammenhang“ für „Hilfsverbrechen“ in Artikel 70 „Unqualifizierte Aktivitäten“ des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
1) Das philippinische Volk erhielt einen "falschen Arbeitsvertrag", der vom Personal der philippinischen Botschaft "zur Verfügung gestellt" wurde.
Dies bedeutet, dass wir Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes erhalten haben.
2) Das philippinische Volk konnte daher den „Aufenthaltsstatus“ erhalten, indem es seinen „Arbeitsvertrag“ der Einwanderung unterbreitete.
Sie sagen, dass sie die Zuwanderungsverletzung begangen haben 22-4- (4).
3) Die Philippinen konnten also in Japan bleiben.
4) So konnte das philippinische Volk gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstoßen.

Dies ist keine kausale Straftat des Einwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitssünde“.

Dies ist Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Dies ist ein Kausalzusammenhang zwischen dem Verstoß gegen "Einreichen falscher Dokumente und Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und dem Unterstützungsgesetz.

Der Verstoß gegen Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes wird vom Justizminister wie folgt behandelt.
1) Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus.
2) Zwangsumsiedlung aus Übersee.

Mit der Überarbeitung von 2010 sind „Unterstützer“ zu „Gleichbehandlungen“ geworden.

Sagen Sie es als Referenz.
Auch wenn Sie ein falsches Dokument einreichen und einen "Aufenthaltsstatus" erhalten,
Wenn Sie im Bereich "Aufenthaltsstatus" arbeiten, verstoßen Sie nicht gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft sind daher völlig unschuldig.

Der Kausalzusammenhang, durch den das philippinische Volk gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstieß, war darauf zurückzuführen, dass es Arbeitgeber gab, die sie anstellten.
So bestraft das Einwanderungsgesetz Arbeitgeber in Artikel 73-2.
Aber die Anklage spricht den Arbeitgeber frei.

Es ist auch möglich, nur Filipinos zu bestrafen, ohne den Arbeitgeber zu bestrafen, der die Hauptursache für illegale Arbeit ist.
Es ist illegal "nicht gleich nach dem Gesetz".
Es verstößt auch gegen internationales Recht, weil es nur Filipinos "vorsätzlich" bestraft.
Deshalb sind auch die Philippinen, die illegal gearbeitet haben, unschuldig.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.


Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes ist für Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes nicht ursächlich.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-09-16: Dear Sir, The darkness of the “Immigration Violation Case” is serious. Immigration law is revised every year. Parliamentarians know the “purpose” of the Immigration Act and amendments most.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-09-16: Dear Sir,
The darkness of the “Immigration Violation Case” is serious.
Immigration law is revised every year.
Parliamentarians know the “purpose” of the Immigration Act and amendments most.
But in reality, legislators don't understand.
In addition, lawyers do not understand immigration law.
Probably there are only a few lawyers in Japan who understand immigration law.
This leads to illegal “indictment” and illegal “trial”.
This is the “actual situation” of “Japanese judicial system”.
Please help everyone.


Part 1. Describes the false name of the sin.
The following scenario is the “causal relationship”
for “Assistance crime” in Article 70 “Unqualified Activities”
of the Immigration Control Act.
1) The Philippine people received a "false employment contract" "provided"
from the Philippine Embassy staff.
This means that we have received support from Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law.
2) Therefore, the Philippine people were able to obtain “Resident Status”
by submitting their “employment contract” to immigration.
They are saying that they committed the violation of Immigration 22-4- (4).
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to violate the Immigration Act Article 70.

This is not a causal offense of the Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor Sin”.

This is the causal relationship between the act
of violating the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submitting false documents
and obtaining status of residence” and the support act.

The violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act will be handled as follows
by the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) Forced removal from overseas.

With the 2010 revision, “supporters” have become “same treatment”.

Say it for reference.
Even if you submit a false document and obtain "Residence Status",
it does not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
if you work within the "Resident Status".

Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are therefore completely innocent.

The causal relationship that caused the Philippine people to violate Article 70
of the Immigration Law was because there were employers who hired them.
So the Immigration Act punishes employers in Article 73-2.
But the prosecution is acquitting the employer.

Also, it is illegal "not equal under the law" to punish
only Filipinos without punishing the employer who is the main cause of unlawful labor.
It also violates international law because it punishes only Filipinos “intentionally”.
That's why Philippines who worked illegally are also innocent.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70

of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-09-16: Dear Sir, The darkness of the “Immigration Violation Case” is serious. Immigration law is revised every year.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-09-16: Dear Sir,
The darkness of the “Immigration Violation Case” is serious.
Immigration law is revised every year.
Parliamentarians know the “purpose” of the Immigration Act and amendments most.
But in reality, legislators don't understand.
In addition, lawyers do not understand immigration law.
Probably there are only a few lawyers in Japan who understand immigration law.
This leads to illegal “indictment” and illegal “trial”.
This is the “actual situation” of “Japanese judicial system”.
Please help everyone.


Part 1. Describes the false name of the sin.
The following scenario is the “causal relationship”
for “Assistance crime” in Article 70 “Unqualified Activities”
of the Immigration Control Act.
1) The Philippine people received a "false employment contract" "provided"
from the Philippine Embassy staff.
This means that we have received support from Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law.
2) Therefore, the Philippine people were able to obtain “Resident Status”
by submitting their “employment contract” to immigration.
They are saying that they committed the violation of Immigration 22-4- (4).
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to violate the Immigration Act Article 70.

This is not a causal offense of the Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor Sin”.

This is the causal relationship between the act
of violating the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submitting false documents
and obtaining status of residence” and the support act.

The violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act will be handled as follows
by the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) Forced removal from overseas.

With the 2010 revision, “supporters” have become “same treatment”.

Say it for reference.
Even if you submit a false document and obtain "Residence Status",
it does not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
if you work within the "Resident Status".

Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are therefore completely innocent.

The causal relationship that caused the Philippine people to violate Article 70
of the Immigration Law was because there were employers who hired them.
So the Immigration Act punishes employers in Article 73-2.
But the prosecution is acquitting the employer.

Also, it is illegal "not equal under the law" to punish
only Filipinos without punishing the employer who is the main cause of unlawful labor.
It also violates international law because it punishes only Filipinos “intentionally”.
That's why Philippines who worked illegally are also innocent.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70

of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ******

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

**********************