Opinion from Japanese Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-09-24: Monsieur, Le président Trump dit que «les immigrants illégaux» «n'acceptent pas» parce que «commet un crime». Et les "musulmans" disent "je ne peux pas accepter" à cause de "causer le terrorisme".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-09-24: Monsieur,
Le président Trump dit que «les immigrants illégaux» «n'acceptent pas» parce que «commet un crime».
Et les "musulmans" disent "je ne peux pas accepter" à cause de "causer le terrorisme".
Au Japon, les procureurs et les juges sont «inhumains».
C'est comme suit. Si des "étrangers" vivent au Japon, ils disent "ils commettront des crimes".
Les "supporters" qui ont permis aux étrangers de vivre au Japon sont des "criminels".
Veuillez vous reporter au «document de décision».


Partie 1 La relation causale «humoristique» est la suivante.
1) "Délinquant principal" provient de "Assistant" à l'article 22-4- (4) du droit de l'immigration
Reçu "fourni" "contrat de travail avec un contenu faux".
2) Par conséquent, le «contrevenant principal» pourrait facilement obtenir le «statut de résident».
(Le contrat de travail sera «joint» à la «Demande de changement de statut de résidence» par l'avis du directeur de la section du ministère de la Justice.)
(Avis du gestionnaire n'est pas une loi).
(Même si vous violez la notification du responsable de section, vous ne pouvez pas être puni en vertu de l'article 31 de la Constitution.)
3) «Le délinquant principal a pu rester au Japon.
4) «Les auteurs principaux ont pu effectuer un« travail illégal en dehors de la qualification », article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.

Par conséquent, "un acte de soutien aux violations de l'article 22-4- 4) de la loi sur l'immigration"
"Impression de violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration" affirme que le lien de causalité est "clair".

Capture d'un autre point de vue.
Supposons qu'un étranger ait obtenu le statut de résident avec de "faux documents".
Toutefois, si vous travaillez dans le cadre de votre statut de résidence, vous ne violerez pas l'article 70 de l'Immigration.
Dans ce cas, "la logique de l'immigration"
Les employeurs qui engagent des étrangers qui ne sont pas autorisés à travailler sont punis en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.

La cause fondamentale du «travail illégal» est donc «les employeurs».
Ne punir que les Philippins sans punir les "employeurs" est illégal, "pas égal devant la loi".

Et les diplomates et ambassades philippines
La relation de cause à effet stipulée à l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, intitulée «Les péchés qui favorisent l'emploi illégal», est clairement différente et illégale.
C'est une «loi d'application» qui est «intentionnellement» fausse.

La raison fondamentale de ce crime est la «discrimination» contre les «étrangers».
Il est clairement écrit dans le «document de jugement».
Les étrangers ont pu faire du «travail illégal» parce qu'ils ont été autorisés à se rendre au Japon.
C'est la conclusion.
«Les étrangers viennent au Japon pour commettre des crimes au Japon».
Le président Trump ne dit pas cela.
Sa haine se limite aux «immigrants entrés illégalement».
Si vous pensez que c'est un mensonge, consultez le «document du jugement».

Cela continuera demain.


Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".


Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-09-24: Sehr geehrter Herr, Präsident Trump sagt, dass "illegale Einwanderer" "nicht akzeptieren", weil "Verbrechen begehen". Und "Muslime" sagen "Ich kann nicht akzeptieren", weil "sie Terrorismus verursachen".

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-09-24: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Präsident Trump sagt, dass "illegale Einwanderer" "nicht akzeptieren", weil "Verbrechen begehen".
Und "Muslime" sagen "Ich kann nicht akzeptieren", weil "sie Terrorismus verursachen".
In Japan sind Staatsanwälte und Richter „unmenschlich“.
Es ist wie folgt. Wenn "Ausländer" in Japan leben, sagen sie "sie werden Verbrechen begehen".
Die "Unterstützer", die es Ausländern erlaubten, in Japan zu leben, sind "Verbrecher".
Bitte beachten Sie das Entscheidungsdokument.


Teil 1. Der „humorvolle“ Kausalzusammenhang lautet wie folgt.
1) "Haupttäter" ist "Assistent" in Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Erhaltener "zur Verfügung gestellter" "Arbeitsvertrag mit falschem Inhalt".
2) Daher könnte "Haupttäter" leicht den "Aufenthaltsstatus" erlangen.
(Der Arbeitsvertrag wird dem Antrag auf Änderung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch die Mitteilung des Leiters der Abteilung Justiz beigefügt.)
(Manager Bekanntmachung ist kein Gesetz).
(Auch wenn Sie gegen die Mitteilung des Abteilungsleiters verstoßen, können Sie nicht nach Artikel 31 der Verfassung bestraft werden.)
3) „Der Haupttäter konnte in Japan bleiben.
4) „Haupttäter konnten„ illegale Arbeit außerhalb der Qualifikation “nach Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes verrichten.

Daher "ein Akt der Unterstützung von Verstößen gegen Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Der "Eindruck eines Verstoßes gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes" besagt, dass der Kausalzusammenhang "klar" ist.

Erfassen Sie aus einer anderen Perspektive.
Angenommen, ein Ausländer hat einen Aufenthaltsstatus mit "falschen Dokumenten" erhalten.
Wenn Sie jedoch im Rahmen Ihres Aufenthaltsstatus arbeiten, verstoßen Sie nicht gegen Artikel 70 der Einwanderungsverordnung.
In diesem Fall "die Logik der Einwanderung"
Arbeitgeber, die Ausländer einstellen, die nicht arbeitsberechtigt sind, werden nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2 bestraft.

Die Hauptursache für „illegale Arbeit“ sind daher „Arbeitgeber“.
Nur Filipinos ohne Bestrafung von "Arbeitgebern" zu bestrafen ist illegal, "gesetzlich nicht gleich".

Und die philippinischen Botschaftsbeamten und Diplomaten
Das in Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes festgelegte Verhältnis zwischen Ursache und Wirkung, „Sünden, die eine rechtswidrige Beschäftigung fördern“, ist eindeutig anders und illegal.
Dies ist ein "Gesetz zur Anwendung des Gesetzes", das "absichtlich" falsch ist.

Der Grund für dieses Verbrechen ist die „Diskriminierung“ von „Ausländern“.
Es ist deutlich im „Urteilsdokument“ vermerkt.
Ausländer konnten illegal arbeiten, weil sie in Japan sein durften.
Dies ist die Schlussfolgerung.
"Ausländer kommen nach Japan, um in Japan Verbrechen zu begehen".
Präsident Trump sagt das nicht.
Sein Hass beschränkt sich auf Einwanderer, die illegal einreisen.
Wenn Sie der Meinung sind, dass es eine Lüge ist, lesen Sie das "Urteilsformular".

Es wird morgen weitergehen.


Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.


Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-09-24: Dear Sir, President Trump says “illegal immigrants” “does not accept” because “does crime”. And "Muslims" say "I can't accept" because of "causing terrorism". In Japan, prosecutors and judges are “inhuman”. It is as follows.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-09-24: Dear Sir,
President Trump says “illegal immigrants” “does not accept” because “does crime”.
And "Muslims" say "I can't accept" because of "causing terrorism".
In Japan, prosecutors and judges are “inhuman”. It is as follows.
If "foreigners" live in Japan, they say "they will commit crimes".
The "supporters" who allowed foreigners to live in Japan are "criminals".
lease see “decision document”.


Part 1. The “humorous” causal relationship is as follows.
1) “Principal offender” received “offer” of “employment contract
with false content” from “assistant” in Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Act.
2) Therefore, “principal offender” could easily obtain “residence status”.
(The employment contract will be “attached” to the “Application for Change
of Status of Residence” by the Ministry of Justice Section Manager's notice.)
(Manager notice is not a law).
(Even if you violate the section manager's notification,
you cannot be punished under Article 31 of the Constitution.)
3) “Principal offender was able to stay in Japan.
4) “Principal offenders have been able to carry out“ illegal labor
outside the qualification ”Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

Therefore, "the act of supporting the violation of Article 22-4- (4)
of Immigration Law" and "the act of violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Law" insist that the causal relationship is "clear".

Capture from another perspective.
Suppose a foreigner has obtained a status of residence with "false documents".
However, if you work within the scope of your status of residence,
you will not violate Article 70 of Immigration.
In this case, the “Immigration Control Logic” punishes employers
who employ foreigners who are not eligible to work
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

The root cause of “illegal labor” is therefore “employers”.
To punish only Filipinos without punishment of "employers" is illegal,
"not equal under the law".

And the staff and diplomats of the Embassy of the Philippines are clearly different
and illegal from the causal relationship stipulated in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
“Sins that Promote Unlawful Employment”.
This is a “law in applying law” that is “intentionally” wrong.

The root reason for this crime is “discrimination” against “foreigners”.
It is clearly written in the “judgment document”.
Foreigners were able to “illegal labor” because they were allowed to be in Japan.
This is the conclusion.
“Foreigners come to Japan to commit crimes in Japan”.
President Trump does not say this.
His hate is limited to "illegal entry" immigrants.
If you think it ’s a lie, check the “judgment document”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.


Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Opinion from Japanese To everyone in the world's media 2019-09-24: Dear Sir, President Trump says “illegal immigrants” “does not accept” because “does crime”. And "Muslims" say "I can't accept" because of "causing terrorism".

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-09-24: Dear Sir,
President Trump says “illegal immigrants” “does not accept” because “does crime”.
And "Muslims" say "I can't accept" because of "causing terrorism".
In Japan, prosecutors and judges are “inhuman”. It is as follows.
If "foreigners" live in Japan, they say "they will commit crimes".
The "supporters" who allowed foreigners to live in Japan are "criminals".
lease see “decision document”.


Part 1. The “humorous” causal relationship is as follows.
1) “Principal offender” received “offer” of “employment contract
with false content” from “assistant” in Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Act.
2) Therefore, “principal offender” could easily obtain “residence status”.
(The employment contract will be “attached” to the “Application for Change
of Status of Residence” by the Ministry of Justice Section Manager's notice.)
(Manager notice is not a law).
(Even if you violate the section manager's notification,
you cannot be punished under Article 31 of the Constitution.)
3) “Principal offender was able to stay in Japan.
4) “Principal offenders have been able to carry out“ illegal labor
outside the qualification ”Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.

Therefore, "the act of supporting the violation of Article 22-4- (4)
of Immigration Law" and "the act of violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Law" insist that the causal relationship is "clear".

Capture from another perspective.
Suppose a foreigner has obtained a status of residence with "false documents".
However, if you work within the scope of your status of residence,
you will not violate Article 70 of Immigration.
In this case, the “Immigration Control Logic” punishes employers
who employ foreigners who are not eligible to work
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

The root cause of “illegal labor” is therefore “employers”.
To punish only Filipinos without punishment of "employers" is illegal,
"not equal under the law".

And the staff and diplomats of the Embassy of the Philippines are clearly different
and illegal from the causal relationship stipulated in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act,
“Sins that Promote Unlawful Employment”.
This is a “law in applying law” that is “intentionally” wrong.

The root reason for this crime is “discrimination” against “foreigners”.
It is clearly written in the “judgment document”.
Foreigners were able to “illegal labor” because they were allowed to be in Japan.
This is the conclusion.
“Foreigners come to Japan to commit crimes in Japan”.
President Trump does not say this.
His hate is limited to "illegal entry" immigrants.
If you think it ’s a lie, check the “judgment document”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.


Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion 致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。 2019-09-23：亲爱的先生， 预计将在韩国实施“检察改革”，任命新的司法部长。 在日本，消除检察官的罪行是一样的。 检察官和法官“滥用权力”“摧毁”民主。 我希望白宫能够“复兴”成为“民主领袖”。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩的最高领导人。


2019-09-23：亲爱的先生，
预计将在韩国实施“检察改革”，任命新的司法部长。
在日本，消除检察官的罪行是一样的。
检察官和法官“滥用权力”“摧毁”民主。
我希望白宫能够“复兴”成为“民主领袖”。


第1部分。违反“主犯”移民法第70条的做法属实。
但是，根据“移民法”第73-2条，雇主（帮助者）没有受到惩罚。
这是“自由裁量权”的“偏差”。这违反了国际法。
起诉是“刑事主犯”
提供“虚假文件”的人被称为违反“移民管制法”第70条的“援助犯罪”。
我们将移民法22-4-（4）称为“犯罪原因”，但这是“适用法律的错误”。
这适用于“特别公职人员滥用权力”。
最高法院的“审判实例”有逮捕和监禁。
“故意证明”不是必需的。
检察官应“接受”“投诉信”。


以下说明“内容为假的假名”。
我先说“结论”。
审判将以“投诉信”为依据。
“投诉信”中的“犯罪原因”
移民法第22-4条 - （4）“描述通过提交虚假文件获得签证状态”。
在“投诉信”中，“虚假文件”是“虚假内容的雇佣合同文件”。
违反“移民法”第22-4-（4）条的外国人将从司法部获得以下“处分”。
1）取消签证状态。
2）被迫离开这个国家。
“援助”或“唆使”的外国人“移民法”第22-4-（4）条受“移民法”2010年修正案的约束。
获得与“刑事罪犯”相同的待遇。
修改前不会受到惩罚。

违反“移民管制法”第70条的“主犯”已经受到处罚。 （1年半监禁）
雇主不受“移民法”第72-2条的惩罚。

这份“起诉书”是“移民法”第70条
“起诉书”判断“除了资格以外工作的外国人”的“助手”。
检察官的“拟议事实”是“支持”“移民法”第22-4-（4）条的罪行。
但是，“移民法”第22-4-（4）条不能如上所述受到惩罚。
移民法第22-4-（4）条规定司法部长的“行政处分”。
所以我坚持认为内容是“假罪的名字”。

以下是偏离“法律逻辑”的检察官和法官的主张。
法官的指控在判决书中有所描述。
在“判决文件”中
“支持”移民法“第22-4-（4）条的行为”是指“移民法第70条规定以外的活动”
“因果关系很明确”。

它将在明天继续。


请参阅以下“网站”中的“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只看这个“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英文翻译”和“日文文本”PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文句子“起诉书”的翻译
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku的起诉”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文本“起诉书”
“对Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku（日语）的起诉”
英文翻译不正确。请参阅上面的“PDF”以获取英文翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）“移民控制和难民认可法”
“移民控制和难民认可法”
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法典
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第2部分。我“起诉”了两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”。
事件已近10年。我的生活是有限的。
我们请求您的支持，以便我们的“荣誉恢复和补偿”得以实施。
如果世界无视“依法治理”，恐怖主义自然会解决它。但是疯了。

1。除“居住资格”以外，外国人进行“非法劳工”。
但外国人是无辜的。
只有外国人因移民法第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，“移民管制法”将非法劳动“因果”的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪）的惩罚。

然而，日本司法机构只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律面前人人平等的原则
它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就“入境管制法”第70条没有“支持”刑法“其他罪行的人”。
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾使馆官员”是无辜的。

2。起诉是因为“支持移民法第22-4-4条”
“刑法”第60条和第62条，反对“入境管制法”第70条
“应用”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律中是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
执行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居住身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强制搬迁”。
因此，“刑法”第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的罪行”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的“移民法”第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与“移民法”第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“粉碎”是“诉讼时效”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。 Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


请问最高领导人金正恩，*


日本政府宣称“横田惠美”的“骨头”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，我不能相信朝鲜所说的任何东西。
这就是我坚持要归还“被绑架者”的原因。
然而，英国科学杂志“自然”提出了关于DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应该根据“自然”问题予以驳斥。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应该“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应该绑架外国人”应该“解决”。
有很多“同族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表“朝鲜半岛人民”抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖的“案例”。

请公布日本政府“移民法”的失实陈述。
请宣布这些事情并谴责日本政府参加七月议员选举。
安倍政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”有更多“外国受害者”而不是“日本绑架者”。
朝鲜应该让世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应该在外国媒体和联合国公布。
朝鲜政府应该特别披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的资料

邮政编码2610-0003
地址Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
名字Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我。
如有任何问题，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-09-23: Dear Sir,Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy. I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.

To President Trump


2019-09-23: Dear Sir,
It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented
in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice.
Eliminating prosecutor crimes is the same in Japan.
Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy.
I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.


Part 1. Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law of “Principal offender” is true.
However, employers (helpers) have not been punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
This is a "deviation" for "Discretion". It is a violation of international law.
The prosecution says that the person
who provided the “false document” to the “principal offender” is an “Assistance crime”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
We claim Immigration Act 22-4- (4) as "reason for crime", but it is "error of applicable law".
This applies to "abuse of authority by special public officer".
The Supreme Court's “judgment example” does Arrest and confinement,
so “intentional proof” is not required.
Prosecutors should "accept" a "letter of complaint".

The following explains "a false name whose contents are false".
I will say the “conclusion” first.
The trial will be based on a “letter of complaint”.
The “reason for crime” in “letter of complaint” is described
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act “Disposition of obtaining visa status
by submitting false documents”.
In “letter of complaint”,
“false document” is “document of employment contract with false content”.
Foreigners who violate Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law will receive the
following “disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancel visa status.
2) Forced to leave the country.
Foreigners who have “Assisted” or “abetmented” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act are subject to the same treatment as “Principal offender”
in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
There will be no punishment before the revision.

“Principal offender” that violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act has already been punished. (1 year and a half in prison).
Employers are not punished by the Immigration Act Article 72-2.

This “bill of indictment” is an “indictment” to judge “an aider”
of Article 70 “Foreigners who did labor other than qualifications”
in the Immigration Control Act.
“Proposed facts” by the prosecutor is a crime for “supporting” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act.
However, Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law cannot be punished as described above.
Immigration Law Article 22-4- (4) states “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
So I insisted that the content is "the name of false sin."

The following are claims of prosecutors and judges who deviate from the "logic of law".
The judge's allegations are described in the judgment document.
In the “judgment document”,
“the act of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act” says “the activities outside the qualification
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act” and “the causal relationship is clear”.

It will continue tomorrow.


Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-09-23: Monsieur, La «réforme des poursuites» devrait être mise en œuvre en Corée avec la nomination d'un nouveau ministre de la Justice. L'élimination des crimes commis par les procureurs est la même au Japon. Les «abus de pouvoir» des procureurs et des juges «détruisent» la démocratie. J'espère que la Maison-Blanche "revivra" en un "leader démocratique".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-09-23: Monsieur,
La «réforme des poursuites» devrait être mise en œuvre en Corée avec la nomination d'un nouveau ministre de la Justice.
L'élimination des crimes commis par les procureurs est la même au Japon.
Les «abus de pouvoir» des procureurs et des juges «détruisent» la démocratie.
J'espère que la Maison-Blanche "revivra" en un "leader démocratique".


Partie 1 La violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration du «contrevenant principal» est vraie.
Toutefois, les employeurs (aides) n'ont pas été sanctionnés en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.
C'est un "écart" pour "Discrétion". C'est une violation du droit international.
La poursuite est "l'auteur principal du crime"
La personne qui a fourni le "faux document" est considérée comme un "crime d'assistance" en violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Nous affirmons que la loi sur l’immigration 22-4- (4) constitue un "motif du crime", mais c’est une "erreur de droit applicable".
Cela concerne "l'abus de pouvoir d'un fonctionnaire spécial".
L'exemple de jugement de la Cour suprême comporte une arrestation et une séquestration.
La «preuve intentionnelle» n'est pas requise.
Les procureurs devraient "accepter" une "lettre de plainte".


Ce qui suit explique "un faux nom dont le contenu est faux".
Je vais d'abord dire la «conclusion».
Le procès s'appuiera sur une «lettre de plainte».
Le «motif du crime» dans «lettre de plainte»
L'article 22-4- 4 de la loi sur l'immigration décrit «l'obtention du statut de visa par la présentation de faux documents».
Dans «lettre de réclamation», «faux document» est un «document de contrat de travail avec un contenu faux».
Les étrangers qui enfreignent l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration recevront la «décision» suivante du ministre de la Justice.
1) Annuler le statut de visa.
2) Forcé de quitter le pays.
Les étrangers qui ont «assisté» ou «enfreint» l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration sont soumis à un amendement de 2010 à la loi sur l'immigration.
Reçoit le même traitement que «délinquant criminel».
Il n'y aura pas de punition avant la révision.

Le «contrevenant principal» qui contrevenait à l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration a déjà été sanctionné. (1 an et demi en prison).
Les employeurs ne sont pas punis par l'article 72-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Cet "acte d'accusation" est l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
«Acte d'accusation» permettant de juger «un collaborateur» de «un étranger qui a travaillé autre que des qualifications».
Les «faits proposés» par le procureur constituent un crime pour avoir «soutenu» l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.
Cependant, l'article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l'immigration ne peut être puni comme décrit ci-dessus.
Loi sur l'immigration L'article 22-4- (4) énonce «Disposition administrative» du ministre de la Justice.
J'ai donc insisté pour que le contenu soit "le nom du faux péché".

Les affirmations suivantes émanent de procureurs et de juges qui s'écartent de la "logique du droit".
Les allégations du juge sont décrites dans le jugement.
Dans le "document de jugement"
«Le fait d’appuyer l’article 22-4- (4) de la loi sur l’immigration» signifie «une activité ne relevant pas de l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration»
"La causalité est claire".

Cela continuera demain.


Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence».
Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-09-23: Sehr geehrter Herr, Es wird erwartet, dass in Korea mit der Ernennung eines neuen Justizministers eine „Reform der Staatsanwaltschaft“ durchgeführt wird. Die Beseitigung von Straftaten der Staatsanwaltschaft ist in Japan dasselbe. Der "Machtmissbrauch" von Staatsanwälten und Richtern "zerstört" die Demokratie. Ich hoffe, dass das Weiße Haus zu einem "demokratischen Führer" "wiederbelebt" wird.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-09-23: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Es wird erwartet, dass in Korea mit der Ernennung eines neuen Justizministers eine „Reform der Staatsanwaltschaft“ durchgeführt wird.
Die Beseitigung von Straftaten der Staatsanwaltschaft ist in Japan dasselbe.
Der "Machtmissbrauch" von Staatsanwälten und Richtern "zerstört" die Demokratie.
Ich hoffe, dass das Weiße Haus zu einem "demokratischen Führer" "wiederbelebt" wird.


Teil 1. Ein Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes des „Haupttäters“ ist richtig.
Arbeitgeber (Helfer) wurden jedoch nicht nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2 bestraft.
Dies ist eine "Abweichung" für "Diskretion". Es ist ein Verstoß gegen das Völkerrecht.
Staatsanwaltschaft ist "Straftäter"
Bei der Person, die das „falsche Dokument“ eingereicht hat, handelt es sich um ein „Hilfsverbrechen“, das gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstößt.
Wir fordern das Einwanderungsgesetz 22-4- (4) als "Grund für die Straftat", aber es ist "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts".
Dies gilt für "Amtsmissbrauch durch Sonderbeamte".
Das "Beispiel des Urteils" des Obersten Gerichtshofs ist verhaftet und eingesperrt.
"Vorsätzlicher Nachweis" ist nicht erforderlich.
Staatsanwälte sollten ein "Beschwerdebrief" "annehmen".


Das Folgende erklärt "einen falschen Namen, dessen Inhalt falsch ist".
Ich werde zuerst die "Schlussfolgerung" sagen.
Der Prozess basiert auf einem „Beschwerdebrief“.
Der "Grund für das Verbrechen" im "Beschwerdebrief"
Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4- (4) „Erlangung des Visastatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente“ wird beschrieben.
Im "Beschwerdebrief" ist "falsches Dokument" ein "Dokument des Arbeitsvertrags mit falschem Inhalt".
Ausländer, die gegen Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstoßen, erhalten vom Justizminister die folgende "Verfügung".
1) Kündigen Sie den Visastatus.
2) Zum Verlassen des Landes gezwungen.
Ausländer, die Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes „unterstützt“ oder „gefördert“ haben, unterliegen einer Änderung des Einwanderungsgesetzes von 2010.
Erhält die gleiche Behandlung wie "Straftäter".
Vor der Überarbeitung wird es keine Bestrafung geben.

Ein „Haupttäter“, der gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstößt, wurde bereits bestraft. (1,5 Jahre im Gefängnis).
Arbeitgeber werden vom Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 72-2 nicht bestraft.

Diese "Anklageschrift" ist Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
"Anklage", um "einen Helfer" von "einem Ausländer, der anders als eine Qualifikation gearbeitet hat" zu beurteilen.
"Vorgeschlagene Tatsachen" der Staatsanwaltschaft sind Straftaten zur "Unterstützung" von Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes kann jedoch nicht wie oben beschrieben bestraft werden.
Zuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4- (4) besagt, dass der Justizminister die Verwaltungsvorschriften einhält.
Also bestand ich darauf, dass der Inhalt "der Name der falschen Sünde" ist.

Es folgen Ansprüche von Staatsanwälten und Richtern, die von der "Logik des Rechts" abweichen.
Die Vorwürfe des Richters sind in der Urteilsurkunde beschrieben.
In der "Urteilsurkunde"
"Der Akt der Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4- (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes" bedeutet "Aktivität außerhalb der Qualifikation von Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes".
"Kausalität ist klar".

Es wird morgen weitergehen.


Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“.
Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-09-23: Dear Sir, It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice. Eliminating prosecutor crimes is the same in Japan. Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy. I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-09-23: Dear Sir,
It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented
in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice.
Eliminating prosecutor crimes is the same in Japan.
Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy.
I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.


Part 1. Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law of “Principal offender” is true.
However, employers (helpers) have not been punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
This is a "deviation" for "Discretion". It is a violation of international law.
The prosecution says that the person
who provided the “false document” to the “principal offender” is an “Assistance crime”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
We claim Immigration Act 22-4- (4) as "reason for crime", but it is "error of applicable law".
This applies to "abuse of authority by special public officer".
The Supreme Court's “judgment example” does Arrest and confinement,
so “intentional proof” is not required.
Prosecutors should "accept" a "letter of complaint".

The following explains "a false name whose contents are false".
I will say the “conclusion” first.
The trial will be based on a “letter of complaint”.
The “reason for crime” in “letter of complaint” is described
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act “Disposition of obtaining visa status
by submitting false documents”.
In “letter of complaint”,
“false document” is “document of employment contract with false content”.
Foreigners who violate Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law will receive the
following “disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancel visa status.
2) Forced to leave the country.
Foreigners who have “Assisted” or “abetmented” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act are subject to the same treatment as “Principal offender”
in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
There will be no punishment before the revision.

“Principal offender” that violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act has already been punished. (1 year and a half in prison).
Employers are not punished by the Immigration Act Article 72-2.

This “bill of indictment” is an “indictment” to judge “an aider”
of Article 70 “Foreigners who did labor other than qualifications”
in the Immigration Control Act.
“Proposed facts” by the prosecutor is a crime for “supporting” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act.
However, Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law cannot be punished as described above.
Immigration Law Article 22-4- (4) states “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
So I insisted that the content is "the name of false sin."

The following are claims of prosecutors and judges who deviate from the "logic of law".
The judge's allegations are described in the judgment document.
In the “judgment document”,
“the act of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act” says “the activities outside the qualification
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act” and “the causal relationship is clear”.

It will continue tomorrow.


Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-09-23: Dear Sir, It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-09-23: Dear Sir,
It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented
in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice.
Eliminating prosecutor crimes is the same in Japan.
Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy.
I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.


Part 1. Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law of “Principal offender” is true.
However, employers (helpers) have not been punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
This is a "deviation" for "Discretion". It is a violation of international law.
The prosecution says that the person
who provided the “false document” to the “principal offender” is an “Assistance crime”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
We claim Immigration Act 22-4- (4) as "reason for crime", but it is "error of applicable law".
This applies to "abuse of authority by special public officer".
The Supreme Court's “judgment example” does Arrest and confinement,
so “intentional proof” is not required.
Prosecutors should "accept" a "letter of complaint".

The following explains "a false name whose contents are false".
I will say the “conclusion” first.
The trial will be based on a “letter of complaint”.
The “reason for crime” in “letter of complaint” is described
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act “Disposition of obtaining visa status
by submitting false documents”.
In “letter of complaint”,
“false document” is “document of employment contract with false content”.
Foreigners who violate Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law will receive the
following “disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancel visa status.
2) Forced to leave the country.
Foreigners who have “Assisted” or “abetmented” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act are subject to the same treatment as “Principal offender”
in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
There will be no punishment before the revision.

“Principal offender” that violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act has already been punished. (1 year and a half in prison).
Employers are not punished by the Immigration Act Article 72-2.

This “bill of indictment” is an “indictment” to judge “an aider”
of Article 70 “Foreigners who did labor other than qualifications”
in the Immigration Control Act.
“Proposed facts” by the prosecutor is a crime for “supporting” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act.
However, Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law cannot be punished as described above.
Immigration Law Article 22-4- (4) states “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
So I insisted that the content is "the name of false sin."

The following are claims of prosecutors and judges who deviate from the "logic of law".
The judge's allegations are described in the judgment document.
In the “judgment document”,
“the act of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act” says “the activities outside the qualification
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act” and “the causal relationship is clear”.

It will continue tomorrow.


Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion September 22, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “Europe should be re-emerged as“ the world champion ””. Dear Sir, Prime Minister Abe is "Great Yes Man". It is not just a contribution to President Trump. It also contributes to President Putin.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

September 22, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “Europe should be re-emerged as“ the world champion ””.

Dear Sir,

Prime Minister Abe is "Great Yes Man".

It is not just a contribution to President Trump.

It also contributes to President Putin.

Part 1. Japan and Russia have a “barren top-level meeting”.

We paid 300 billion yen as an “economic cooperation fee” in 2016 for this “conference”.

The world's media should campaign to “to ask for money” to the Japanese government.

Countries that don't know this are losing money.

The world should be fair.

At the end of September, “Japan-US signing” news is flowing in “Japan-US trade negotiations”.

Japan calls it TAG (Japan-US Trade Agreement).

The United States is called FTA (Free Trade Agreement).

Japanese media rarely report on the “background” and results of trade negotiations between Japan and the United States.

What we are most interested in is the "rate of exchange clause".

The Japanese government has said that there is no talk from the US so far.

However, the “rate of exchange clause” cannot be “preferably treated” only in Japan.

If “favorable treatment” is given, “FTA countries” such as Mexico and Canada will also require “renegotiation”.

Therefore, it is impossible to “exclude” the “rate of exchange clause” part.

In the first place, why do we need a “border wall with Mexico”?

Donald Trump suddenly came up with a “thinking”.

And the Americans were “joyed”.

There are already over 10 million illegal immigrants in the United States.

Illegal immigrants are contributing to the US GDP.

If there are no illegal immigrants, I think the US economy is in a “troubled situation” at this time.

There is only one way to “win China” peacefully.

It is to accept the "poor people" as "provisional immigrants" by making the border with Mexico a "special zone".

If a wall is needed, the company that built the "factory" will build it.

We need more than 100 million “provisional migrants”.

I really want to say 1 billion people.

President Trump will be “shock dead”.

I say 100 million people for the “great president”.

Excellent White House staff should calculate the “GDP” effect of 100 million “provisional immigrants”.

And I expect to “report” it to a good president.

This is also true for the UK, Germany, France, etc.

“To re-establish Europe as a“ world champion, ”a“ special zone ”should be built and“ provisional immigrants ”accepted from the world to expand GDP.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. We propose to build “special zones” in Europe and other countries.

Please read along with suggestions to the US (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see

Prosperity of each country is realized by the world being free, democratic, and “ruled under the law”.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano