致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。 2019-10-02：亲爱的先生， 菲律宾政府中的某人了解法律。 因为有很多带有“娱乐签证”的菲律宾“ Japayuki san”来日本。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-10-02：亲爱的先生，
菲律宾政府中的某人了解法律。
因为有很多带有“娱乐签证”的菲律宾“ Japayuki san”来日本。
“ Japayuki san”在徒的“调解”中担任“女主人”和“妓女”。
因此，传统的“娱乐签证”被废除了。
参加谈判的菲律宾官员了解《日本移民法》。


第一部分该事件是由于以下原因造成的犯罪。
1）我们不想“惩罚”根据《移民法》第73-2条非法雇用外国人的雇主。
2）第70条“非法劳工犯罪”中的“我只想惩罚”外国人。

“罪犯”是警察，检察官和法官。
和外交部的工作人员。
正确，
1）非法雇用外国人的雇主应受到《移民法》第73-2条的惩罚。
2）非法工作的外国人应受到《移民管制法》第70条的处罚。

随着2010年7月对《移民法》的修订，雇主无法了解《移民法》第73-2条的“借口”成为不可能。
为此，除“护照”外，我们还引入了“居民卡”系统。
可以使用“护照”或“居留卡”确认雇用外国人的雇主。

检察官有权起诉。
禁止惩罚非法雇用外国人的雇主。
但是，不公正地惩罚外国人是违反国际法的行为。
它违反了日本宪法的“法律上的平等”。
在这种情况下，外国人也应被无罪释放。

检察官犯下了“严重罪行”。
在《移民法》第73-2条中，以第三方代替雇主被指定为“支持者”。
含义未知。
起诉书包括以下内容：
1）描述了菲律宾违反了《移民法》第70条的事实。
2）菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官
它描述了向菲律宾人“提供”“虚假文件”（雇佣合同）的事实。
3）说明菲律宾人民违反《移民法》第22-4-4条的规定获得居留身份。

这一事实表明，菲律宾大使馆的工作人员和外交人员“讨厌”。
他们所做的是支持违反《移民法》第22-4-4条的行为。

在这种情况下，“菲律宾人”将受到司法部长的“行政处分”。
“取消居留身份”和“强迫离境”。

因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“协助犯罪”不适用于《移民管制法》第22-4-4条。

根据2010年7月的《移民管制修正案》，根据《移民法》第22-4-4条的支持者将以与“违反者”相同的方式处置。
是“居住状况的取消”和“强制搬家”

我说了很多遍。
非法劳动是雇主与外国人之间的同谋。
雇主是无辜的。如果是这样，菲律宾是无辜的。
菲律宾人民是受害者。犯罪者是雇主。

菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官被“虚假指控”，因为他们没有“甚至1毫米”违法。
菲律宾政府应要求日本政府为菲律宾人民“恢复光荣”和“赔偿”。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，仅通过查看此“起诉书”，您就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持，以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，恐怖主义就自然而然地解决了。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。

但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我，金国阁，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
将《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”适用于《移民管制法》第70条是“疯狂的”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人按照第22-4-4条（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）的规定行事。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广


请询问最高领导人金正恩（*）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump 2019-10-02: Dear Sir,This incident is a crime that occurred for the following reasons. 1) We do not want to “punish” employers who hired foreigners illegally under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act. 2) “I want to punish” only foreigners in Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.

To President Trump


2019-10-02: Dear Sir,
Someone in the Philippine government understands the law.
Because there were many “Japayuki san” coming to Japan from the Philippines with “entertainment visas”.
“Japayuki san” worked as “hostess” and “prostitute”
in “mediation” of gangsters. Therefore, the traditional “Entertainment Visa” was abolished.
Philippine officials who participated in the negotiations understand the Japanese Immigration Law.

Part 1. This incident is a crime that occurred for the following reasons.
1) We do not want to “punish” employers who hired foreigners illegally
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
2) “I want to punish” only foreigners in Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.

“Criminals” are police officers, prosecutors, and judges.
And the staff of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Correctly,
1) Employers who hired foreigners illegally should be punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
2) Foreigners who worked illegally should be punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

The “excuse” that the employer did not know about Immigration Act Article 73-2
became impossible with the July 2010 revision of the Immigration Act.
To that end, we introduced a “residence card” system in addition to a “passport”.
Employers who hire foreigners can be confirmed with a "passport" or "residence card".

Prosecutors have the discretion to prosecute.
It is permissible not to punish employers who have hired foreigners illegally.
However, it is a violation of international law to punish only foreigners unfairly.
It violates the “Equality under the Law” of the Constitution of Japan.
In this case, foreigners should also be acquitted.

The prosecutor committed a "terrible crime".
A third party in place of an employer in the Immigration Act Article 73-2 was designated as a “supporter”.
The meaning is unknown.
The bill of indictment includes the following:
1) Describes the fact that the Philippine violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
2) Describes the fact that Philippine embassy officials and diplomats “provided” “false documents”
 (employment contracts) to the Filipinos.
3) State the fact that the Philippine people have obtained a status of residence
in violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.

This fact shows a “hate” for the staff and diplomats of the Embassy of the Philippines.
What they did was to support violations of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

In this case, “Philippines” will receive “administrative disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
“Cancellation of Status of Residence” and “Forced Departure”.

Therefore, the “Assistance Crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

As a result of the July 2010 Immigration Control Amendment,
supporters under the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 will be disposed of in the same way as “violators”.
It is "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced removal"

I say many times.
Illegal labor is a complicity between employers and foreigners.
The employer is innocent. If so, the Philippine is innocent.
Philippine people are victims. The perpetrator is an employer.

Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate the law “even 1 mm”,
so it is a “false charge”.
The Philippine government should ask the Japanese government
for “recovery of honor” and “compensation” for the Philippine people.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
 an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-10-02: Monsieur, Un membre du gouvernement philippin comprend la loi. Parce que de nombreux «Japayuki san» arrivent au Japon en provenance des Philippines avec des «visas de divertissement».

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-10-02: Monsieur,
Un membre du gouvernement philippin comprend la loi.
Parce que de nombreux «Japayuki san» arrivent au Japon en provenance des Philippines avec des «visas de divertissement».
«Japayuki san» a travaillé comme «hôtesse» et «prostituée» dans la «médiation» de gangsters.
Par conséquent, le «visa de divertissement» traditionnel a été supprimé.
Les fonctionnaires philippins qui ont participé aux négociations comprennent la loi japonaise sur l'immigration.


Partie 1 Cet incident est un crime qui a eu lieu pour les raisons suivantes.
1) Nous ne voulons pas «punir» les employeurs qui ont embauché des étrangers illégalement en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.
2) "Je veux punir" uniquement les étrangers à l'article 70 "Crimes de travail illégaux".

Les «criminels» sont les policiers, les procureurs et les juges.
Et le personnel du ministère des Affaires étrangères.
Correctement
1) Les employeurs qui ont embauché des étrangers illégalement devraient être punis en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.
2) Les étrangers qui travaillent illégalement devraient être punis en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

L'excuse selon laquelle l'employeur n'était pas au courant de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration est devenue impossible avec la révision de la loi sur l'immigration de juillet 2010.
À cette fin, nous avons mis en place un système de «carte de séjour» en plus d’un «passeport».
Les employeurs qui embauchent des étrangers peuvent être confirmés avec un "passeport" ou une "carte de résidence".

Les procureurs ont le pouvoir discrétionnaire d'engager des poursuites.
Il est permis de ne pas punir les employeurs qui ont embauché des étrangers illégalement.
Cependant, ne punir que les étrangers de manière injuste est une violation du droit international.
Cela viole «l'égalité devant la loi» de la Constitution du Japon.
Dans ce cas, les étrangers devraient également être acquittés.

Le procureur a commis un "crime terrible".
Un tiers à la place d'un employeur dans la loi sur l'immigration, article 73-2, a été désigné comme «partisan».
La signification est inconnue.
L'acte d'accusation comprend les éléments suivants:
1) Décrit le fait que les Philippines ont violé l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration.
2) Ambassades et diplomates des Philippines
Il décrit le fait que de "faux documents" (contrats de travail) ont été "fournis" aux Philippins.
3) Indiquer que le peuple philippin a obtenu le statut de résident en violation de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Ce fait montre une "haine" pour le personnel et les diplomates de l'ambassade des Philippines.
Ce qu'ils ont fait, c'est appuyer les violations de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration.

Dans ce cas, les «Philippines» recevront une «décision administrative» du ministre de la Justice.
«Annulation du statut de résidence» et «Départ forcé».

Par conséquent, les «crimes d'assistance» énoncés aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal ne peuvent être appliqués à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

À la suite de l’amendement de juillet 2010 relatif au contrôle de l’immigration, les partisans de l’article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l’immigration seront traités de la même manière que les «contrevenants».
C'est "annulation du statut de résidence" et "déménagement forcé"

Je dis plusieurs fois.
Le travail illégal est une complicité entre employeurs et étrangers.
L'employeur est innocent. Si c'est le cas, la Philippine est innocente.
Les Philippins sont des victimes. L'auteur est un employeur.

Les représentants de l’ambassade et les diplomates philippins ne violent pas la loi «même 1 mm», il s’agit donc d’une «fausse accusation».
Le gouvernement philippin devrait demander au gouvernement japonais de "récupérer son honneur" et de "dédommager" le peuple philippin.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce «acte d’accusation» pour comprendre «l’erreur de la loi applicable».

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Il est «fou» d’appliquer le «crime pour soutenir d’autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Un étranger a agi conformément à l'article 22-4-4 (acquisition du statut de résident par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et la compensation de l'honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-02: Sehr geehrter Herr, Jemand in der philippinischen Regierung versteht das Gesetz. Weil es viele "Japayuki san" gab, die mit "Unterhaltungsvisa" von den Philippinen nach Japan kamen.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-10-02: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Jemand in der philippinischen Regierung versteht das Gesetz.
Weil es viele "Japayuki san" gab, die mit "Unterhaltungsvisa" von den Philippinen nach Japan kamen.
"Japayuki san" arbeitete als "Hostess" und "Prostituierte" in der "Vermittlung" von Gangstern.
Daher wurde das traditionelle "Entertainment Visa" abgeschafft.
Philippinische Beamte, die an den Verhandlungen teilgenommen haben, verstehen das japanische Einwanderungsgesetz.


Teil 1. Dieser Vorfall ist ein Verbrechen, das aus folgenden Gründen begangen wurde.
1) Wir wollen keine Arbeitgeber "bestrafen", die nach Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes illegal Ausländer eingestellt haben.
2) "Ich möchte nur Ausländer bestrafen" in Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen".

"Kriminelle" sind Polizisten, Staatsanwälte und Richter.
Und die Mitarbeiter des Außenministeriums.
Richtig,
1) Arbeitgeber, die illegal Ausländer eingestellt haben, sollten nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2 bestraft werden.
2) Ausländer, die illegal gearbeitet haben, sollten nach Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes bestraft werden.

Die „Entschuldigung“, dass der Arbeitgeber nicht über das Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2 Bescheid wusste, wurde mit der Überarbeitung des Einwanderungsgesetzes im Juli 2010 unmöglich.
Zu diesem Zweck haben wir zusätzlich zu einem „Reisepass“ ein „Aufenthaltskartensystem“ eingeführt.
Arbeitgeber, die Ausländer einstellen, können mit einem "Reisepass" oder einer "Aufenthaltskarte" bestätigt werden.

Die Staatsanwaltschaft kann nach eigenem Ermessen strafrechtlich verfolgt werden.
Es ist zulässig, Arbeitgeber, die Ausländer illegal eingestellt haben, nicht zu bestrafen.
Es verstößt jedoch gegen das Völkerrecht, nur Ausländer ungerecht zu bestrafen.
Es verstößt gegen die "Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz" der japanischen Verfassung.
In diesem Fall sollten auch Ausländer freigesprochen werden.

Der Staatsanwalt hat ein "schreckliches Verbrechen" begangen.
Ein Dritter anstelle eines Arbeitgebers gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes wurde als „Unterstützer“ bestimmt.
Die Bedeutung ist unbekannt.
Die Anklageschrift enthält Folgendes:
1) Beschreibt die Tatsache, dass die Philippine gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstoßen hat.
2) Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft
Es beschreibt die Tatsache, dass "falsche Dokumente" (Arbeitsverträge) den Filipinos "zur Verfügung gestellt" wurden.
3) Geben Sie an, dass das philippinische Volk unter Verstoß gegen Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes eine Aufenthaltserlaubnis erhalten hat.

Diese Tatsache zeigt einen "Hass" für die Mitarbeiter und Diplomaten der Botschaft der Philippinen.
Sie unterstützten Verstöße gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4.

In diesem Fall erhalten die "Philippinen" vom Justizminister eine "administrative Verfügung".
"Annullierung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsaustritt".

Daher können die „Verbrechen der Amtshilfe“ in Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht auf Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes angewendet werden.

Infolge der Novelle zur Einwanderungskontrolle vom Juli 2010 werden Unterstützer nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4 auf die gleiche Weise entsorgt wie „Verstöße“.
Es ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung"

Sage ich oft.
Illegale Arbeit ist eine Komplizenschaft zwischen Arbeitgebern und Ausländern.
Der Arbeitgeber ist unschuldig. Wenn ja, ist der Philippine unschuldig.
Philippinische Menschen sind Opfer. Der Täter ist ein Arbeitgeber.

Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft verstoßen nicht gegen das Gesetz "auch nur 1 mm", daher handelt es sich um eine "falsche Anklage".
Die philippinische Regierung sollte die japanische Regierung um "Wiedergutmachung der Ehre" und "Entschädigung" für das philippinische Volk bitten.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Es ist "verrückt", das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" in Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "anzuwenden".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ein Ausländer handelte gemäß Artikel 22-4-4 (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-02: Dear Sir,“Japayuki san” worked as “hostess” and “prostitute” in “mediation” of gangsters. Therefore, the traditional “Entertainment Visa” was abolished. Philippine officials who participated in the negotiations understand the Japanese Immigration Law.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-02: Dear Sir,
Someone in the Philippine government understands the law.
Because there were many “Japayuki san” coming to Japan from the Philippines with “entertainment visas”.
“Japayuki san” worked as “hostess” and “prostitute”
in “mediation” of gangsters. Therefore, the traditional “Entertainment Visa” was abolished.
Philippine officials who participated in the negotiations understand the Japanese Immigration Law.

Part 1. This incident is a crime that occurred for the following reasons.
1) We do not want to “punish” employers who hired foreigners illegally
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
2) “I want to punish” only foreigners in Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.

“Criminals” are police officers, prosecutors, and judges.
And the staff of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Correctly,
1) Employers who hired foreigners illegally should be punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
2) Foreigners who worked illegally should be punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

The “excuse” that the employer did not know about Immigration Act Article 73-2
became impossible with the July 2010 revision of the Immigration Act.
To that end, we introduced a “residence card” system in addition to a “passport”.
Employers who hire foreigners can be confirmed with a "passport" or "residence card".

Prosecutors have the discretion to prosecute.
It is permissible not to punish employers who have hired foreigners illegally.
However, it is a violation of international law to punish only foreigners unfairly.
It violates the “Equality under the Law” of the Constitution of Japan.
In this case, foreigners should also be acquitted.

The prosecutor committed a "terrible crime".
A third party in place of an employer in the Immigration Act Article 73-2 was designated as a “supporter”.
The meaning is unknown.
The bill of indictment includes the following:
1) Describes the fact that the Philippine violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
2) Describes the fact that Philippine embassy officials and diplomats “provided” “false documents”
 (employment contracts) to the Filipinos.
3) State the fact that the Philippine people have obtained a status of residence
in violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.

This fact shows a “hate” for the staff and diplomats of the Embassy of the Philippines.
What they did was to support violations of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

In this case, “Philippines” will receive “administrative disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
“Cancellation of Status of Residence” and “Forced Departure”.

Therefore, the “Assistance Crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

As a result of the July 2010 Immigration Control Amendment,
supporters under the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 will be disposed of in the same way as “violators”.
It is "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced removal"

I say many times.
Illegal labor is a complicity between employers and foreigners.
The employer is innocent. If so, the Philippine is innocent.
Philippine people are victims. The perpetrator is an employer.

Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate the law “even 1 mm”,
so it is a “false charge”.
The Philippine government should ask the Japanese government
for “recovery of honor” and “compensation” for the Philippine people.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
 an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-10-02: Dear Sir, Someone in the Philippine government understands the law. Because there were many “Japayuki san” coming to Japan from the Philippines with “entertainment visas”.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-02: Dear Sir,
Someone in the Philippine government understands the law.
Because there were many “Japayuki san” coming to Japan from the Philippines with “entertainment visas”.
“Japayuki san” worked as “hostess” and “prostitute”
in “mediation” of gangsters. Therefore, the traditional “Entertainment Visa” was abolished.
Philippine officials who participated in the negotiations understand the Japanese Immigration Law.

Part 1. This incident is a crime that occurred for the following reasons.
1) We do not want to “punish” employers who hired foreigners illegally
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.
2) “I want to punish” only foreigners in Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.

“Criminals” are police officers, prosecutors, and judges.
And the staff of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Correctly,
1) Employers who hired foreigners illegally should be punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
2) Foreigners who worked illegally should be punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

The “excuse” that the employer did not know about Immigration Act Article 73-2
became impossible with the July 2010 revision of the Immigration Act.
To that end, we introduced a “residence card” system in addition to a “passport”.
Employers who hire foreigners can be confirmed with a "passport" or "residence card".

Prosecutors have the discretion to prosecute.
It is permissible not to punish employers who have hired foreigners illegally.
However, it is a violation of international law to punish only foreigners unfairly.
It violates the “Equality under the Law” of the Constitution of Japan.
In this case, foreigners should also be acquitted.

The prosecutor committed a "terrible crime".
A third party in place of an employer in the Immigration Act Article 73-2 was designated as a “supporter”.
The meaning is unknown.
The bill of indictment includes the following:
1) Describes the fact that the Philippine violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
2) Describes the fact that Philippine embassy officials and diplomats “provided” “false documents”
 (employment contracts) to the Filipinos.
3) State the fact that the Philippine people have obtained a status of residence
in violation of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.

This fact shows a “hate” for the staff and diplomats of the Embassy of the Philippines.
What they did was to support violations of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

In this case, “Philippines” will receive “administrative disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
“Cancellation of Status of Residence” and “Forced Departure”.

Therefore, the “Assistance Crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied to Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

As a result of the July 2010 Immigration Control Amendment,
supporters under the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 will be disposed of in the same way as “violators”.
It is "cancellation of status of residence" and "forced removal"

I say many times.
Illegal labor is a complicity between employers and foreigners.
The employer is innocent. If so, the Philippine is innocent.
Philippine people are victims. The perpetrator is an employer.

Philippine embassy officials and diplomats do not violate the law “even 1 mm”,
so it is a “false charge”.
The Philippine government should ask the Japanese government
for “recovery of honor” and “compensation” for the Philippine people.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
 an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。 2019-10-01：亲爱的先生， 卖淫之所以“成立”，是因为有“男性”购买“女性”。 日本检察官“认为”可以由一名妇女从事“卖淫”。 加拿大将“男性”定为“有罪”。 而“女人”被无罪释放。日本司法很疯狂。 国际社会应指导日本。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-10-01：亲爱的先生，
卖淫之所以“成立”，是因为有“男性”购买“女性”。
日本检察官“认为”可以由一名妇女从事“卖淫”。
加拿大将“男性”定为“有罪”。
而“女人”被无罪释放。日本司法很疯狂。
国际社会应指导日本。


第一部分进行调查的检察官犯有第172条“虚假事实的批评”的犯罪事实。
2014年6月左右。菲律宾人在东京的一家“园林公司”从事“不合格活动”。
检察官不逮捕因《移民法》第73-2条“促进非法就业而犯罪”而非法雇用外国人的“雇主”。
只有菲律宾人因《移民法》第70条“不合格活动的处罚”而被捕。
“想要获得立功的检察官”“滥用”了他的“权威”。
与非法工作的菲律宾人的“正常方式”不同，
根据《移民控制法》第70条，“计划”为“劳动惩罚”。

为此，必须根据《移民法》第73-2条对雇主进行惩罚，以免违反国际法。
但是，由于他不想因“感情”而惩罚雇主，因此他逮捕了“无辜的第三方”。
第三方是《移民法》第22-4-4条“提交虚假文件”的“支持者”。
犯罪的原因是它支持《移民控制法》第22-4-4条。
但是，《移民法》第22-4-4条不是犯罪，因此被指定为《移民法》第70条的“支持者”。
检察官非法“伪装”使馆工作人员（驾驶员）作为违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持”。

大使馆工作人员（司机）向菲律宾人提供了“虚假雇佣合同文件”。
然后，他通过附上“虚假就业合同文件”获得“居民身份”。
这违反了《移民法》第22-4-4条。

但是，由于违反了《移民控制法》第70条，它被强制与“支持”联系在一起。
逻辑如下。
1）菲律宾人民收到“带有虚假内容的雇佣合同文件”。
2）菲律宾人民能够轻松获得“居民身份”。
3）菲律宾之所以能够留在日本，是因为他们能够获得“居民身份”。
4）由于菲律宾人能够留在日本，因此完成了第70条“非法劳工”。
在此之后，
在《移民法》第70条“不合格活动”中，菲律宾人被判处“监禁”。
他们是非法雇佣外国人的“美化公司”的受害者。
菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官已规定了《移民法》第22-4-4条的支持
根据《刑法》第60条和第62条被“起诉”。
它们不违反日本法律“甚至1mm”。
他们是“错误的指控”。他们是“无辜的”。

菲律宾政府仍然无法理解吗？
您应该向外国政府寻求“法律支持”。
菲律宾政府应要求日本政府对菲律宾人民进行“恢复名誉”和“赔偿”。
中国政府也是如此。
中国人在2010年遭到破坏。

明天将继续。


请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，仅通过查看此“起诉书”，您就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持，以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，恐怖主义就自然而然地解决了。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。

但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我，金国阁，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
将《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”适用于《移民管制法》第70条是“疯狂的”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人按照第22-4-4条（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）的规定行事。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广


请询问最高领导人金正恩（*）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump 2019-10-01: Dear Sir, Prostitution is “established” because there are “male” who buy “female”. Japanese prosecutors “think” that “prostitution” can be done by one woman. Canada makes “male” “guilty”. And “woman” is acquitted. Japanese justice is crazy. The international community should guide Japan.

To President Trump


2019-10-01: Dear Sir,
Prostitution is “established” because there are “male” who buy “female”.
Japanese prosecutors “think” that “prostitution” can be done
by one woman. Canada makes “male” “guilty”.
And “woman” is acquitted. Japanese justice is crazy.
The international community should guide Japan.


Part 1. Criminal facts of Article 172 "Criticism of False False" committed
by the prosecutor who conducted the investigation.
Around June 2014. Filipinos were working in “non-qualified activities”
at a “landscaping company” in Tokyo.
Prosecutors do not arrest "employees" who hired foreigners illegally
in Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sinners to Promote Unlawful Employment",
and only Filipinos in Immigration Act Article 70 I was arrested.
“The prosecutor who wants to get a meritorious deed” “abused” his “authority”.
They “planned” the illegal work of Filipinos as “working punishment”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Act, unlike the “normal way”.

To do so, employers must be punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
in order not to violate international law.
However, because he did not want to punish the employer for “feeling”,
he arrested the “innocent third party”.
The third party is the “supporter”
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submission of False Documents”.
The reason for the crime is that it supported Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act is not a crime,
so it was named “supporter” of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Prosecutors illegally “disguised” embassy staff (drivers) as “support”
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

The Filipinos were provided with a “document of false employment contract”
by the embassy staff (driver).
Then, he obtained “Resident Status” by attaching “Contract Documents for False Employment”.
This is a violation of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

However, it was forcibly linked to “support” for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic is as follows.
1) The Philippine people received “a contract document of employment with false content”.
2) Philippine people were able to easily obtain “resident status”.
3) Philippines were able to stay in Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
4) Since the Filippins were able to stay in Japan, Article 70 “Illegal Labor” was completed.
afterwards,
The Filipinos were sentenced to "jail sentence"
in Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Act.
They are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired foreigners illegally.
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats were "indicted"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code for reasons of criminal activity supported
by the Immigration Act 22-4-4.
They do not violate Japanese law "even 1mm". They are “false accusation”.
They are “innocent”.

Is the Philippine government still unable to understand?
You should ask foreign governments for “legal support”.
And the Philippine government should demand the "recovery of honor" and "compensation"
of the Philippine people from the Japanese government.
The same applies to the Chinese government.
The Chinese were damaged in 2010.

It will continue tomorrow. The following tasks are ::

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-10-01: Monsieur, La prostitution est "établie" car il y a des "hommes" qui achètent des "femmes". Les procureurs japonais «pensent» que la «prostitution» peut être faite par une femme. Le Canada rend «un homme» «coupable».

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-10-01: Monsieur,
La prostitution est "établie" car il y a des "hommes" qui achètent des "femmes".
Les procureurs japonais «pensent» que la «prostitution» peut être faite par une femme.
Le Canada rend «un homme» «coupable».
Et "femme" est acquitté. La justice japonaise est folle.
La communauté internationale devrait guider le Japon.


Partie 1 Faits criminels de l'article 172 "Critique du faux Faux" commis par le procureur qui a mené l'enquête.
Vers juin 2014. Les Philippins travaillaient dans des "activités non qualifiées" dans une "entreprise d'aménagement paysager" à Tokyo.
Les procureurs n'arrêtent pas les "employeurs" qui ont embauché des étrangers illégalement pour le droit de l'immigration, article 73-2 du code pénal "Le crime pour promouvoir l'emploi illégal"
Seuls les Philippins ont été arrêtés en vertu de l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration, intitulé «Sinence pour activités non qualifiées».
«Le procureur qui veut obtenir un acte méritoire» a «abusé» de son «autorité».
Contrairement à la «voie normale» des Philippins qui travaillaient illégalement,
«Prévu» comme «punition du travail» au sens de l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.

Pour ce faire, les employeurs doivent être punis en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration afin de ne pas enfreindre le droit international.
Cependant, parce qu'il ne voulait pas punir l'employeur pour son "sentiment", il a arrêté le "tiers innocent".
La tierce partie est le «partisan» de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration, intitulé «Présentation de faux documents».
La raison de ce crime est qu’elle a soutenu l’article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
Cependant, l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration n'étant pas un crime, il a été désigné comme un "partisan" de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Les procureurs ont «déguisé» illégalement le personnel de l'ambassade (chauffeurs) en tant que «soutien» en cas de violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Les Philippins ont reçu un «document de faux contrat de travail» de la part du personnel de l'ambassade (chauffeur).
Ensuite, il a obtenu le «statut de résident» en joignant les «documents contractuels pour faux emploi».
Ceci est une violation de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration.

Cependant, il était lié de force à un «soutien» en cas de violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
La logique est la suivante.
1) Le peuple philippin a reçu "un document contractuel d'emploi avec un contenu faux".
2) Les Philippins ont facilement pu obtenir le «statut de résident».
3) Les Philippines ont pu rester au Japon car elles ont pu obtenir un «statut de résident».
4) Depuis que les Philippines ont pu rester au Japon, l'article 70 «Travail illégal» a été complété.
Alors
Les Philippins ont été condamnés à une "peine d'emprisonnement" en vertu de l'article 70 "Activités non qualifiées" de la loi sur l'immigration.
Ils sont victimes d’entreprises d’aménagement paysager qui ont embauché des étrangers illégalement.
Les fonctionnaires et diplomates de l'ambassade des Philippines ont stipulé le soutien de la loi sur l'immigration, article 22-4-4.
"Inculpé" en vertu des articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal.
Ils ne violent pas la loi japonaise "même 1mm".
Ce sont des "fausses accusations". Ils sont "innocents".

Le gouvernement philippin est-il toujours incapable de comprendre?
Vous devriez demander aux gouvernements étrangers un «soutien juridique».
Et le gouvernement philippin devrait exiger du gouvernement japonais la "récupération de l'honneur" et la "compensation" du peuple philippin.
La même chose s'applique au gouvernement chinois.
Les Chinois ont été endommagés en 2010.

Cela continuera demain.


Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce «acte d’accusation» pour comprendre «l’erreur de la loi applicable».

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Il est «fou» d’appliquer le «crime pour soutenir d’autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Un étranger a agi conformément à l'article 22-4-4 (acquisition du statut de résident par la présentation de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et la compensation de l'honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-01: Sehr geehrter Herr, Prostitution ist "etabliert", weil es "Männer" gibt, die "Frauen" kaufen. Japanische Staatsanwälte "denken", dass "Prostitution" von einer Frau durchgeführt werden kann. Kanada macht "männlich" "schuldig".

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-10-01: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Prostitution ist "etabliert", weil es "Männer" gibt, die "Frauen" kaufen.
Japanische Staatsanwälte "denken", dass "Prostitution" von einer Frau durchgeführt werden kann.
Kanada macht "männlich" "schuldig".
Und "Frau" wird freigesprochen. Die japanische Justiz ist verrückt.
Die internationale Gemeinschaft sollte Japan leiten.


Teil 1. Kriminelle Tatsachen des Artikels 172 "Kritik an Falsch Falsch", die von dem Staatsanwalt begangen wurden, der die Ermittlungen durchgeführt hat.
Ungefähr im Juni 2014. Die Filipinos arbeiteten in „nicht qualifizierten Tätigkeiten“ bei einer „Landschaftsgestaltungsfirma“ in Tokio.
Staatsanwälte verhaften keine "Arbeitgeber", die Ausländer illegal für das Einwanderungsgesetz eingestellt haben. Artikel 73-2 "Straftat zur Förderung illegaler Beschäftigung"
Nur Filipinos wurden aufgrund von Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes „Sünde für uneingeschränkte Aktivitäten“ verhaftet.
"Der Staatsanwalt, der eine verdienstvolle Tat erwirken will", "missbrauchte" seine "Autorität".
Im Gegensatz zu den "normalen" Filipinos, die illegal gearbeitet haben,
"Geplant" als "Bestrafung der Arbeit" gemäß Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Dazu müssen Arbeitgeber nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2 bestraft werden, um nicht gegen das Völkerrecht zu verstoßen.
Weil er den Arbeitgeber jedoch nicht wegen „Gefühls“ bestrafen wollte, nahm er den „unschuldigen Dritten“ fest.
Der Dritte ist der "Befürworter" des Einwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4 "Vorlage falscher Dokumente".
Der Grund für das Verbrechen ist, dass es Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt.
Da Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes jedoch kein Verbrechen ist, wurde er als „Befürworter“ von Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes bezeichnet.
Staatsanwälte "verkleiden" illegal das Personal der Botschaft (Fahrer) als "Unterstützung" für Verstöße gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Die Filipinos erhielten vom Botschaftspersonal (Fahrer) ein „Dokument über einen falschen Arbeitsvertrag“.
Anschließend erhielt er den „Resident Status“, indem er die „Vertragsdokumente für eine falsche Beschäftigung“ beifügte.
Dies ist ein Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4.

Es wurde jedoch zwangsweise mit der „Unterstützung“ eines Verstoßes gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes in Verbindung gebracht.
Die Logik ist wie folgt.
1) Das philippinische Volk erhielt „ein Vertragsdokument über eine Beschäftigung mit falschem Inhalt“.
2) Philippinische Menschen konnten leicht den „Aufenthaltsstatus“ erlangen.
3) Die Philippinen konnten in Japan bleiben, weil sie einen „Aufenthaltsstatus“ erhalten haben.
4) Da die Filippins in Japan bleiben konnten, wurde Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeit“ abgeschlossen.
Dann
Die Filipinos wurden in Artikel 70 "Unqualifizierte Aktivitäten" des Einwanderungsgesetzes zu "Gefängnisstrafe" verurteilt.
Sie sind Opfer von „Landschaftsbauunternehmen“, die illegal Ausländer eingestellt haben.
Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft haben die Unterstützung des Einwanderungsgesetzes in Artikel 22-4-4 festgelegt
"Angeklagt" nach Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches.
Sie verstoßen nicht gegen das japanische Gesetz "sogar 1mm".
Sie sind „falsche Anschuldigungen“. Sie sind "unschuldig".

Kann die philippinische Regierung noch immer nicht verstehen?
Sie sollten ausländische Regierungen um „rechtliche Unterstützung“ bitten.
Und die philippinische Regierung sollte von der japanischen Regierung die "Wiedererlangung der Ehre" und "Entschädigung" des philippinischen Volkes fordern.
Gleiches gilt für die chinesische Regierung.
Die Chinesen wurden 2010 beschädigt.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.


Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Es ist "verrückt", das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" in Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "anzuwenden".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ein Ausländer handelte gemäß Artikel 22-4-4 (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-01: Dear Sir, Prostitution is “established” because there are “male” who buy “female”. Japanese prosecutors “think” that “prostitution” can be done by one woman. Canada makes “male” “guilty”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-01: Dear Sir,
Prostitution is “established” because there are “male” who buy “female”.
Japanese prosecutors “think” that “prostitution” can be done
by one woman. Canada makes “male” “guilty”.
And “woman” is acquitted. Japanese justice is crazy.
The international community should guide Japan.


Part 1. Criminal facts of Article 172 "Criticism of False False" committed
by the prosecutor who conducted the investigation.
Around June 2014. Filipinos were working in “non-qualified activities”
at a “landscaping company” in Tokyo.
Prosecutors do not arrest "employees" who hired foreigners illegally
in Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sinners to Promote Unlawful Employment",
and only Filipinos in Immigration Act Article 70 I was arrested.
“The prosecutor who wants to get a meritorious deed” “abused” his “authority”.
They “planned” the illegal work of Filipinos as “working punishment”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Act, unlike the “normal way”.

To do so, employers must be punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
in order not to violate international law.
However, because he did not want to punish the employer for “feeling”,
he arrested the “innocent third party”.
The third party is the “supporter”
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submission of False Documents”.
The reason for the crime is that it supported Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act is not a crime,
so it was named “supporter” of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Prosecutors illegally “disguised” embassy staff (drivers) as “support”
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

The Filipinos were provided with a “document of false employment contract”
by the embassy staff (driver).
Then, he obtained “Resident Status” by attaching “Contract Documents for False Employment”.
This is a violation of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

However, it was forcibly linked to “support” for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic is as follows.
1) The Philippine people received “a contract document of employment with false content”.
2) Philippine people were able to easily obtain “resident status”.
3) Philippines were able to stay in Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
4) Since the Filippins were able to stay in Japan, Article 70 “Illegal Labor” was completed.
afterwards,
The Filipinos were sentenced to "jail sentence"
in Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Act.
They are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired foreigners illegally.
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats were "indicted"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code for reasons of criminal activity supported
by the Immigration Act 22-4-4.
They do not violate Japanese law "even 1mm". They are “false accusation”.
They are “innocent”.

Is the Philippine government still unable to understand?
You should ask foreign governments for “legal support”.
And the Philippine government should demand the "recovery of honor" and "compensation"
of the Philippine people from the Japanese government.
The same applies to the Chinese government.
The Chinese were damaged in 2010.

It will continue tomorrow. The following tasks are ::

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-10-01: Dear Sir, Prostitution is “established” because there are “male” who buy “female”. Japanese prosecutors “think” that “prostitution” can be done by one woman. Canada makes “male” “guilty”.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-01: Dear Sir,
Prostitution is “established” because there are “male” who buy “female”.
Japanese prosecutors “think” that “prostitution” can be done
by one woman. Canada makes “male” “guilty”.
And “woman” is acquitted. Japanese justice is crazy.
The international community should guide Japan.


Part 1. Criminal facts of Article 172 "Criticism of False False" committed
by the prosecutor who conducted the investigation.
Around June 2014. Filipinos were working in “non-qualified activities”
at a “landscaping company” in Tokyo.
Prosecutors do not arrest "employees" who hired foreigners illegally
in Immigration Act Article 73-2 "Sinners to Promote Unlawful Employment",
and only Filipinos in Immigration Act Article 70 I was arrested.
“The prosecutor who wants to get a meritorious deed” “abused” his “authority”.
They “planned” the illegal work of Filipinos as “working punishment”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Act, unlike the “normal way”.

To do so, employers must be punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
in order not to violate international law.
However, because he did not want to punish the employer for “feeling”,
he arrested the “innocent third party”.
The third party is the “supporter”
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Submission of False Documents”.
The reason for the crime is that it supported Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act is not a crime,
so it was named “supporter” of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Prosecutors illegally “disguised” embassy staff (drivers) as “support”
for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

The Filipinos were provided with a “document of false employment contract”
by the embassy staff (driver).
Then, he obtained “Resident Status” by attaching “Contract Documents for False Employment”.
This is a violation of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4.

However, it was forcibly linked to “support” for violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic is as follows.
1) The Philippine people received “a contract document of employment with false content”.
2) Philippine people were able to easily obtain “resident status”.
3) Philippines were able to stay in Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
4) Since the Filippins were able to stay in Japan, Article 70 “Illegal Labor” was completed.
afterwards,
The Filipinos were sentenced to "jail sentence"
in Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Act.
They are victims of “landscaping companies” who hired foreigners illegally.
Philippine embassy officials and diplomats were "indicted"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code for reasons of criminal activity supported
by the Immigration Act 22-4-4.
They do not violate Japanese law "even 1mm". They are “false accusation”.
They are “innocent”.

Is the Philippine government still unable to understand?
You should ask foreign governments for “legal support”.
And the Philippine government should demand the "recovery of honor" and "compensation"
of the Philippine people from the Japanese government.
The same applies to the Chinese government.
The Chinese were damaged in 2010.

It will continue tomorrow. The following tasks are ::

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp