Help, not just anybody,Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-08: Dazu muss er das Völkerrecht einhalten. "Ich habe vorgetäuscht", über "Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz" zu verfügen. Er "verkleidet" einen "Anhänger", der gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstößt, um nicht gegen das Völkerrecht zu verstoßen.

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-10-08: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4 ist keine „strafrechtliche Sanktion“.
Ich sagte "meinem Anwalt", dass der "Grund für das Verbrechen" in der "Anklage" falsch sei.
Aber der Anwalt sagt: "Es hat keinen Sinn, die Logik des Verfahrens auszudrücken."
Sie sollten die japanischen Anwaltsdienste für Ausländer öffnen.


Teil 1. Staatsanwälte verhafteten Filipinos wegen "unqualifizierter Arbeit".
Er führte "Verbrechen" durch, um die philippinische "Inhaftierung" zu erreichen.
(In der Regel eine kleine Geldstrafe).

Dazu muss er das Völkerrecht einhalten.
"Ich habe vorgetäuscht", über "Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz" zu verfügen.
Er "verkleidet" einen "Anhänger", der gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstößt, um nicht gegen das Völkerrecht zu verstoßen.

Dieser Identitätswechsel ist wichtig.
Rechtsakte, die Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützen, können nicht bestraft werden, da es sich um Verwaltungsmaßnahmen handelt.

So wurde es mit dem folgenden Szenario verkleidet.
1) Philippinische Menschen, die illegal arbeiteten, erhielten von „Anhängern“ „zur Verfügung gestellte“ „falsche gefälschte Arbeitsverträge“.
2) So konnten die Philippinen einen Aufenthaltsstatus erlangen.
3) Die Philippinen konnten also in Japan bleiben.
4) Das philippinische Volk konnte also „unqualifizierte Arbeit“ leisten.
Daher Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches für Einwanderung Artikel 70 "Verbrechen der illegalen Arbeit"
"Sünder, die anderen Verbrechen helfen" wurde angewandt.

"Strafprozess" basiert auf "Anklageschrift".
Überlegt werden sollte "Grund zur Kriminalität".
Der strafrechtliche Grund für die „Anklage“ beschreibt den Akt des Einwanderungsgesetzes 22-4-4 und den Akt zu dessen Unterstützung.
Diese Tatsache ist eine "administrative Disposition" des Justizministers.

Staatsanwälte, Anwälte und Richter wissen das nicht.
Das ist ernst.

Vorübergehend mit "falschen Dokumenten" (Vertragsdokumente falscher Beschäftigung)
Auch wenn Sie "Resident Status" erhalten, wenn Sie im Rahmen Ihres Aufenthaltsstatus arbeiten, werden Sie nicht in den Immigration Act Artikel 70 "Unqualified Labour".
Der Kausalzusammenhang, durch den das philippinische Volk gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstieß, ist darauf zurückzuführen, dass es Arbeitgeber gab, die sie illegal eingestellt hatten.
Der Arbeitgeber kann keine „Entschuldigung“ dafür vorbringen, dass er Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes nicht kannte.
Zu diesem Zweck wurde das Zuwanderungsgesetz vom Juli 2010 geändert.
Die dreijährige Nachfrist ist abgelaufen.
Zur Erleichterung der Bestätigung wurde auch ein „Aufenthaltskartensystem“ eingeführt.

Es gibt keine „Entschuldigung“ für Polizisten, Staatsanwälte und Richter, die „das Gesetz nicht kannten“.
Sie billigen ihre Verbrechen nicht.
Sie brauchen "extreme Strafe".

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.


Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Es ist "verrückt", das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" in Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "anzuwenden".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help, not just anybody, To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-08: Dear Sir, Prosecutors arrested Filipinos for "unqualified labor". He performed "crime" to make the Philippine "Imprisonment". (Usually a small fine).

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister



2019-10-08: Dear Sir,
Violation of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 is not a “criminal penalty”.
I told "my lawyer" that the "reason for crime" in the "indictment" was wrong.
But the lawyer says, "It's no use saying the logic of the procedure."
You should “open” Japanese “lawyer services” to foreigners.


Part 1. Prosecutors arrested Filipinos for "unqualified labor".
He performed "crime" to make the Philippine "Imprisonment". (Usually a small fine).

To do so, he must comply with international law.
“I pretended” to dispose of “equality under the law”.
He “disguised” a “supporter”
who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act so as not to violate international law.

This impersonation is important.
Acts that support Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be punished
because they are administrative measures.

So, it was disguised with the following scenario.
1) Philippine people
who worked illegally received “provided” “false fake employment contracts” from “supporters”.
2) So the Philippines were able to obtain a status of residence.
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to do “unqualified work”.
Therefore, the Criminal Code 60 and 62 “Sinners Supporting Other Crimes”
against the Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes” were applied.

“Criminal trial” is based on “bill of indictment”.
What should be deliberated is "reason for crime".
The criminal reason for “indictment” describes the act of Immigration Act 22-4-4
and the act to support it.
This fact is "administrative disposition" by the Minister of Justice.

Prosecutors, lawyers, and judges do not know this.
This is serious.

Even if you obtain “Resident Status” with “false documents”
 (contract documents for false employment), if you work within the scope
 of your status of residence, you will not become Article 70 “Unqualified Labor”.
The causal relationship that caused the Philippine people to violate Article 70
of the Immigration Law is because there were employers who hired them illegally.
The employer cannot make an “excuse” that he did not know Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act.
To that end, the July 2010 Immigration Act was amended.
The three-year grace period is over.
A “residence card” system was also introduced to facilitate confirmation.

There is no “excuse” for police officers,
prosecutors, and judges who “did not know the law”.
They do not approve of their crimes.
They need "extreme penalty".

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help, I need somebody, Help, 2019-10-08: Dear Sir, Violation of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 is not a “criminal penalty”. I told "my lawyer" that the "reason for crime" in the "indictment" was wrong. But the lawyer says, "It's no use saying the logic of the procedure." You should “open” Japanese “lawyer services” to foreigners.I need somebody,

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-08: Dear Sir,
Violation of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 is not a “criminal penalty”.
I told "my lawyer" that the "reason for crime" in the "indictment" was wrong.
But the lawyer says, "It's no use saying the logic of the procedure."
You should “open” Japanese “lawyer services” to foreigners.


Part 1. Prosecutors arrested Filipinos for "unqualified labor".
He performed "crime" to make the Philippine "Imprisonment". (Usually a small fine).

To do so, he must comply with international law.
“I pretended” to dispose of “equality under the law”.
He “disguised” a “supporter”
who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act so as not to violate international law.

This impersonation is important.
Acts that support Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act cannot be punished
because they are administrative measures.

So, it was disguised with the following scenario.
1) Philippine people
who worked illegally received “provided” “false fake employment contracts” from “supporters”.
2) So the Philippines were able to obtain a status of residence.
3) So the Philippines were able to stay in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to do “unqualified work”.
Therefore, the Criminal Code 60 and 62 “Sinners Supporting Other Crimes”
against the Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes” were applied.

“Criminal trial” is based on “bill of indictment”.
What should be deliberated is "reason for crime".
The criminal reason for “indictment” describes the act of Immigration Act 22-4-4
and the act to support it.
This fact is "administrative disposition" by the Minister of Justice.

Prosecutors, lawyers, and judges do not know this.
This is serious.

Even if you obtain “Resident Status” with “false documents”
 (contract documents for false employment), if you work within the scope
 of your status of residence, you will not become Article 70 “Unqualified Labor”.
The causal relationship that caused the Philippine people to violate Article 70
of the Immigration Law is because there were employers who hired them illegally.
The employer cannot make an “excuse” that he did not know Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act.
To that end, the July 2010 Immigration Act was amended.
The three-year grace period is over.
A “residence card” system was also introduced to facilitate confirmation.

There is no “excuse” for police officers,
prosecutors, and judges who “did not know the law”.
They do not approve of their crimes.
They need "extreme penalty".

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ******

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

**********************

Won't you please, please help me 最高领导人金正恩。 2019-10-07：亲爱的先生， 我要求日本律师协会联合会提供“人权救济支持”。 但是，“日本律师协会联合会”回应说，他们无权解决。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-10-07：亲爱的先生，
我要求日本律师协会联合会提供“人权救济支持”。
但是，“日本律师协会联合会”回应说，他们无权解决。
日本没有律师保护人权。
因此，我正在寻求国际社会的支持。各国政府应认真对待这一问题。


第一部分本周，“审判检察官”承诺
我想说“特别公职人员滥用职权”。

2014年6月前后，“审判检察官”从“审讯检察官”移交。
事实是支持《移民法》第22-4-4条“取消居留身份”的行为。
但是检察官犯了这样的罪行。
1）来自大使馆工作人员（司机）
因为收到了“提供的”“内容虚假的雇佣合同”，所以获得了“居住身份”。
2）由于菲律宾获得“居住身份”，他们得以留在日本。
3）因此，菲律宾得以“非法从事非法工作”。

在神奈川县警察局被“拘留”的菲律宾人违反了《移民管制法》第70条“不合格活动”。

因此，使馆工作人员（驾驶员）被指定为《移民法》第70条“非法劳工”的“支持者”。

“刑事原因”是违反《移民控制法》第24-4-4条的“支持”。
法律明确指出，违反《移民控制法》第24-4-4条是司法部长的一项行政措施。
这不是犯罪。

但是，检察官非法逮捕和关押使馆工作人员为罪犯。

同年6月左右，检察官以虚假的“起诉书”开始了“审判”。
检察官“施压”使馆工作人员的“决策自由”。
使馆工作人员被“逮捕，关押”和“审判”。

检察官对此案进行了思考。
他不想惩罚根据《移民法》第73-2条非法雇用外国人的“雇主”。
只有“非法工作”的外国人才能受到第70条“非法劳动”的指控。
犯罪动机是惩罚外国人“从事工作犯罪”并获得“成就”。

犯罪的原因是《移民管制法》第22-4-4条中的“支持”。
事实是“驱逐出境”的“行政处置”。
然而，
作为移民法的第22-4-4条“取消居留身份”中的“支持”被定为犯罪。
他认为这是非法的，但“没有人怀疑”。

“支持”违反《移民管制法》第22-4-4条的规定为“犯罪原因”
作为《移民管制法》第70条“资格之外的非法劳工”的“支持者”。

检察官认为。
日本人容易受到法律的伤害。
无论如何，律师不会认真辩护。
没有人会注意到这一“把戏”。

这是可怕的罪行，仍然存在于日本司法界的犯罪历史中。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持，以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。

但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我，金国阁，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《刑法》第60条和第62条与《移民管制法》第70条相对
“申请”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广


请询问最高领导人金正恩（*******）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的信息******** ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help, you know I need someone, help To President Trump 2019-10-07: Dear Sir, I asked the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for "human rights relief support". However, the “Japan Federation of Bar Associations” responds that they have no power to solve.

To President Trump


2019-10-07: Dear Sir,
I asked the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for "human rights relief support".
However, the “Japan Federation of Bar Associations” responds that they have no power to solve.
There are no lawyers in Japan who protect human rights.
So I am seeking support from the international community.
Governments in each country should take this issue seriously.


Part 1. This week, I will talk about the “abuse of authority
by special public officer” committed by the prosecutor of trial.

Around June 2014, the “trial prosecutor” was handed over
from the “prosecutor of the interrogation”.
The truth is the act of supporting the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4
“Cancellation of Status of Residence”.
But the prosecutor committed a crime like this.
1) Since the Filippins received “provided” “employment contract with false contents”
from the embassy staff (driver), they were able to obtain “residence status”.
2) Since the Philippine gained “residence status”, they were able to stay in Japan.
3) So the Philippines were able to “unlawful illegal work”.

Filipinos who were "in custody" at a police station
in Kanagawa were violated Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, the embassy staff (driver) was designated as a “supporter”
for Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Act.

"Criminal reason" is "support" for violation of Article 24-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
It is clearly stated in the law that the violation of Article 24-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative measure of the Minister of Justice.
This is not a crime.

However, the prosecutor illegally arrested and confined the embassy staff as a criminal.

Around June of the same year, the public prosecutor started a “trial”
with a false “bill of indictment”.
The prosecutor “Pressure” the embassy staff's “freedom of decision-making”.
The embassy staff was “arrested and confined” and “trial”. *

The prosecutor thought in this case.
He does not want to punish "employers" who hired foreigners illegally
under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
Only foreigners who have “worked illegally” would be punished
for charges of Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
The criminal motive is to punish foreigners for “work crimes” and earn “achievements”.

The reason for the crime is “support” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
The truth is the “administrative disposition” of “deportation”.
But,
“Support” in Article 22-4-4 “Cancellation of Status of Residence”
as an immigration law was criminalized.
He thought it was illegal but “no one doubts”.

“Support” for violations of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act was designated
as “Supporter” of Article 70 “Illegal Labor outside of qualification” as “reason for crime”.

The prosecutor thought.
Japanese are vulnerable to the law.
Anyway lawyers will not seriously defend.
No one will notice this “trick”.

It's a terrible crime that remains in the history of crime in the Japanese judicial circle.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ********



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********

Help me!Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-10-07: Monsieur, J'ai demandé à la Fédération japonaise des associations de barreaux "un soutien en faveur des droits de l'homme".

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-10-07: Monsieur,
J'ai demandé à la Fédération japonaise des associations de barreaux "un soutien en faveur des droits de l'homme".
Cependant, la «Fédération japonaise des associations de barreaux» répond qu’elles n’ont aucun pouvoir à résoudre.
Au Japon, aucun avocat ne protège les droits de l'homme.
Je recherche donc le soutien de la communauté internationale. Les gouvernements de chaque pays devraient prendre ce problème au sérieux.


Partie 1 Cette semaine, le "procureur" a commis
Je voudrais dire «abus de pouvoir d'un fonctionnaire spécial».

Vers juin 2014, le «procureur du procès» a été remis par le «procureur de l'interrogatoire».
La vérité est l'acte de soutenir l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration «Annulation du statut de résidence».
Mais le procureur a commis un crime comme celui-ci.
1) Du personnel de l'ambassade (chauffeur)
Le «statut de résidence» a été obtenu parce que le «contrat de travail avec un contenu faux» «fourni» a été reçu.
2) Depuis que les Philippines ont acquis le «statut de résident», elles ont pu rester au Japon.
3) Les Philippines ont donc pu «exercer un travail illégal illégal».

Les Philippins qui étaient "en garde à vue" dans un commissariat de police à Kanagawa ont été enfreints à l'article 70 "Activités non qualifiées" de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Par conséquent, le personnel de l’ambassade (chauffeur) a été désigné comme «partisan» de l’article 70 «Travail illégal» de la loi sur l’immigration.

Le "motif pénal" est un "soutien" en cas de violation de l'article 24-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
La loi stipule clairement que la violation de l'article 24-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration est une mesure administrative du ministre de la justice.
Ce n'est pas un crime.

Cependant, le procureur a illégalement arrêté et incarcéré le personnel de l'ambassade en tant que criminel.

Vers le mois de juin de la même année, le procureur engagea un "procès" avec un faux "acte d'accusation".
Le procureur "met la pression" sur la "liberté de décision" du personnel de l'ambassade.
Le personnel de l'ambassade a été «arrêté et emprisonné» et «jugé». *

Le procureur a pensé dans cette affaire.
Il ne veut pas punir les "employeurs" qui ont embauché des étrangers illégalement en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Seuls les étrangers qui ont "travaillé illégalement" seraient punis pour avoir été accusés en vertu de l'article 70 "Travail illégal".
Le motif criminel est de punir les étrangers pour «crimes de travail» et de gagner des «réalisations».

Le motif de l'infraction est «soutien» à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
La vérité est la "disposition administrative" de "déportation".
Cependant,
«Soutien» à l'article 22-4-4 «Annulation du statut de résidence» en tant que loi sur l'immigration était incriminé.
Il pensait que c'était illégal mais «personne ne doute».

«Soutien» en cas de violation de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration en tant que «motif du crime»
Fait de "partisan" de l'article 70 "Travail illégal en dehors de la qualification" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Le procureur a pensé.
Les Japonais sont vulnérables à la loi.
Quoi qu'il en soit, les avocats ne se défendront pas sérieusement.
Personne ne remarquera ce "truc".

C'est un crime terrible qui reste dans l'histoire du crime dans le cercle judiciaire japonais.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me, help me, oh Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-07: Sehr geehrter Herr, Ich bat die Japan Federation of Bar Associations um "Unterstützung der Menschenrechtshilfe".

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-10-07: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Ich bat die Japan Federation of Bar Associations um "Unterstützung der Menschenrechtshilfe".
Die "Japan Federation of Bar Associations" antwortet jedoch, dass sie keine Befugnis zur Lösung haben.
In Japan gibt es keine Anwälte, die die Menschenrechte schützen.
Deshalb suche ich Unterstützung von der internationalen Gemeinschaft. Die Regierungen in jedem Land sollten dieses Problem ernst nehmen.


Teil 1. Diese Woche hat sich der "Prozessstaatsanwalt" verpflichtet
Ich möchte sagen, "Missbrauch der Autorität durch einen speziellen Beamten".

Ungefähr im Juni 2014 wurde der „Prozessstaatsanwalt“ vom „Staatsanwalt des Verhörs“ übergeben.
Die Wahrheit ist der Akt der Unterstützung des Einwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4 „Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus“.
Aber der Staatsanwalt hat ein solches Verbrechen begangen.
1) Vom Botschaftspersonal (Fahrer)
Der "Aufenthaltsstatus" wurde erhalten, weil der "zur Verfügung gestellte" "Arbeitsvertrag mit falschem Inhalt" erhalten wurde.
2) Da die Philippinen den Aufenthaltsstatus erlangten, konnten sie in Japan bleiben.
3) Die Philippinen waren also in der Lage, "illegal zu arbeiten".

Filipinos, die sich auf einer Polizeiwache in Kanagawa "in Gewahrsam" befanden, verstießen gegen Artikel 70 "Unqualifizierte Aktivitäten" des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Daher wurde das Botschaftspersonal (Fahrer) als „Unterstützer“ für Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeit“ des Einwanderungsgesetzes bestimmt.

"Krimineller Grund" ist "Unterstützung" für Verstöße gegen Artikel 24-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
Im Gesetz ist eindeutig festgelegt, dass der Verstoß gegen Artikel 24-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes eine Verwaltungsmaßnahme des Justizministers ist.
Das ist kein Verbrechen.

Der Staatsanwalt verhaftete jedoch illegal das Personal der Botschaft und sperrte es als Verbrecher ein.

Etwa im Juni desselben Jahres leitete die Staatsanwaltschaft ein "Verfahren" mit einer falschen "Anklageschrift" ein.
Der Staatsanwalt "drängt" die "Entscheidungsfreiheit" des Botschaftspersonals.
Das Botschaftspersonal wurde „verhaftet und eingesperrt“ und „vor Gericht“. *

Der Staatsanwalt dachte in diesem Fall nach.
Er will keine "Arbeitgeber" bestrafen, die nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2 Ausländer illegal eingestellt haben.
Nur Ausländer, die „illegal gearbeitet haben“, würden für die Anklage nach Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeit“ bestraft.
Das kriminelle Motiv ist, Ausländer für „Arbeitsverbrechen“ zu bestrafen und „Erfolge“ zu erzielen.

Der Grund für das Verbrechen ist "Unterstützung" in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
Die Wahrheit ist die "administrative Disposition" der "Abschiebung".
Jedoch
"Unterstützung" in Artikel 22-4-4 "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" als Einwanderungsgesetz wurde unter Strafe gestellt.
Er dachte, es sei illegal, aber "niemand zweifelt".

"Unterstützung" für Verstöße gegen Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes als "Grund für Straftaten"
"Befürworter" von Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeit außerhalb der Qualifikation" des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt dachte nach.
Japaner sind anfällig für das Gesetz.
Auf jeden Fall werden Anwälte nicht ernsthaft verteidigen.
Niemand wird diesen „Trick“ bemerken.

Es ist ein schreckliches Verbrechen, das im japanischen Justizkreis in der Geschichte des Verbrechens verblieben ist.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen ******************

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help, not just anybody, To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-07: Dear Sir, I asked the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for "human rights relief support". However, the “Japan Federation of Bar Associations” responds that they have no power to solve.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-07: Dear Sir,
I asked the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for "human rights relief support".
However, the “Japan Federation of Bar Associations” responds that they have no power to solve.
There are no lawyers in Japan who protect human rights.
So I am seeking support from the international community.
Governments in each country should take this issue seriously.


Part 1. This week, I will talk about the “abuse of authority
by special public officer” committed by the prosecutor of trial.

Around June 2014, the “trial prosecutor” was handed over
from the “prosecutor of the interrogation”.
The truth is the act of supporting the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4
“Cancellation of Status of Residence”.
But the prosecutor committed a crime like this.
1) Since the Filippins received “provided” “employment contract with false contents”
from the embassy staff (driver), they were able to obtain “residence status”.
2) Since the Philippine gained “residence status”, they were able to stay in Japan.
3) So the Philippines were able to “unlawful illegal work”.

Filipinos who were "in custody" at a police station
in Kanagawa were violated Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, the embassy staff (driver) was designated as a “supporter”
for Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Act.

"Criminal reason" is "support" for violation of Article 24-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
It is clearly stated in the law that the violation of Article 24-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative measure of the Minister of Justice.
This is not a crime.

However, the prosecutor illegally arrested and confined the embassy staff as a criminal.

Around June of the same year, the public prosecutor started a “trial”
with a false “bill of indictment”.
The prosecutor “Pressure” the embassy staff's “freedom of decision-making”.
The embassy staff was “arrested and confined” and “trial”. *

The prosecutor thought in this case.
He does not want to punish "employers" who hired foreigners illegally
under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
Only foreigners who have “worked illegally” would be punished
for charges of Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
The criminal motive is to punish foreigners for “work crimes” and earn “achievements”.

The reason for the crime is “support” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
The truth is the “administrative disposition” of “deportation”.
But,
“Support” in Article 22-4-4 “Cancellation of Status of Residence”
as an immigration law was criminalized.
He thought it was illegal but “no one doubts”.

“Support” for violations of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act was designated
as “Supporter” of Article 70 “Illegal Labor outside of qualification” as “reason for crime”.

The prosecutor thought.
Japanese are vulnerable to the law.
Anyway lawyers will not seriously defend.
No one will notice this “trick”.

It's a terrible crime that remains in the history of crime in the Japanese judicial circle.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help, I need somebody, To everyone in the world's media 2019-10-07: Dear Sir, I asked the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for "human rights relief support". However, the “Japan Federation of Bar Associations” responds that they have no power to solve.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-07: Dear Sir,
I asked the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for "human rights relief support".
However, the “Japan Federation of Bar Associations” responds that they have no power to solve.
There are no lawyers in Japan who protect human rights.
So I am seeking support from the international community.
Governments in each country should take this issue seriously.


Part 1. This week, I will talk about the “abuse of authority
by special public officer” committed by the prosecutor of trial.

Around June 2014, the “trial prosecutor” was handed over
from the “prosecutor of the interrogation”.
The truth is the act of supporting the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4
“Cancellation of Status of Residence”.
But the prosecutor committed a crime like this.
1) Since the Filippins received “provided” “employment contract with false contents”
from the embassy staff (driver), they were able to obtain “residence status”.
2) Since the Philippine gained “residence status”, they were able to stay in Japan.
3) So the Philippines were able to “unlawful illegal work”.

Filipinos who were "in custody" at a police station
in Kanagawa were violated Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, the embassy staff (driver) was designated as a “supporter”
for Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Act.

"Criminal reason" is "support" for violation of Article 24-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
It is clearly stated in the law that the violation of Article 24-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative measure of the Minister of Justice.
This is not a crime.

However, the prosecutor illegally arrested and confined the embassy staff as a criminal.

Around June of the same year, the public prosecutor started a “trial”
with a false “bill of indictment”.
The prosecutor “Pressure” the embassy staff's “freedom of decision-making”.
The embassy staff was “arrested and confined” and “trial”. *

The prosecutor thought in this case.
He does not want to punish "employers" who hired foreigners illegally
under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
Only foreigners who have “worked illegally” would be punished
for charges of Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
The criminal motive is to punish foreigners for “work crimes” and earn “achievements”.

The reason for the crime is “support” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
The truth is the “administrative disposition” of “deportation”.
But,
“Support” in Article 22-4-4 “Cancellation of Status of Residence”
as an immigration law was criminalized.
He thought it was illegal but “no one doubts”.

“Support” for violations of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act was designated
as “Supporter” of Article 70 “Illegal Labor outside of qualification” as “reason for crime”.

The prosecutor thought.
Japanese are vulnerable to the law.
Anyway lawyers will not seriously defend.
No one will notice this “trick”.

It's a terrible crime that remains in the history of crime in the Japanese judicial circle.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information ******

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

**********************

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion October 6, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “The prosperity of the United States must be the prosperity of allies.” Dear Sir, President Trump said, “US companies should withdraw from China and return to the United States.” He “directed the removal of Chinese companies from the US stock market”. In October 2019, China appealed to the world for its military capability to instantly destroy and destroy the United States. It is the United States itself that makes China a “military power”, crazy. In the future, the US will need “national management” that does not rely on China in all fields. This requires the cooperation of allies. There is no time to tweet and play.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

October 6, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “The prosperity of the United States must be the prosperity of allies.”

Dear Sir,

President Trump said, “US companies should withdraw from China and return to the United States.” He “directed the removal of Chinese companies from the US stock market”. In October 2019, China appealed to the world for its military capability to instantly destroy and destroy the United States. It is the United States itself that makes China a “military power”, crazy. In the future, the US will need “national management” that does not rely on China in all fields. This requires the cooperation of allies. There is no time to tweet and play.

Part 1. It is a continuation of the previous day.

It is not “illegal immigrants” who have taken away the work of US workers.

“China” has taken away the work of American workers.

China took all of America.

“Illegal immigrants” are important human resources for rebuilding the United States.

According to the American Agricultural Federation (the largest agricultural group in the United States, commonly known as the Farm Bureau), more than half of the country's field crops are “shared” by “illegal workers”.

If it suddenly disappears, the federation says US agriculture will be “devastated”.

On the other hand, according to US Census Bureau data (16-year estimate), about 31% of all illegal immigrants worked in the service industry.

About 24% of workers engaged in agriculture, fishing and forestry are “illegal migrants”.

The construction industry, which uses the largest number of “illegal migrants” with 1.35 million, accounts for 15% of the total.

According to data from the National Restaurant Association based on data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, nearly 25% of the employees who worked in restaurants in 2016 were born in foreign countries, exceeding the average of all departments by 18%.

“Craig Regelbrugge,” senior vice president of industry support and research for AmericanHort, representing the horticultural industry, says, “These workers have worked for a long time and are proficient in their jobs.”

And they declared, “It is an indispensable presence for agriculture, business, and the local economy.”

"Their labor (illegal workers), on the other hand, has the economic effect of deriving two or three related jobs in the vicinity."

“Even though there are only a few Americans looking for jobs in the horticultural industry or on the farm, they are supported by the workplaces and municipalities where many Americans work.”

Regelbrugge says so.

The above is "Posted on January 28, 2019, Asahi Shimbun Globe +"

Quoted "(Miriam Jordan) © 2018 The New York Times".

Thus, “illegal immigrants” are necessary in the United States.

If there are no “illegal immigrants” in the US, I think the US will be a “poor country” even more than it is now.

To enrich the United States, you need to increase GDP.

Protecting American farmers is to consume agricultural products in the United States.

“Agricultural management” that relies on China should be stopped.

President Donald Trump has instructed American companies to withdraw from China.

We are requesting a factory return from China to the United States.

However, companies do not have a “return destination” for the “factory” to return to the United States.

So, I'm proposing to make all the borders along the Mexican border a “special zone”.

Latin America's “poor” is an American treasure.

Accept them as “provisional immigrants” in the “special zone”.

They work as “low wage simple workers” in the improvement of “special zones”.

A safe “provisional immigrant” should contribute to labor demand in the United States by giving a regular “labor visa”.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. We propose to build “special zones” in Europe and other countries.

Please read along with suggestions to the US (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see

Prosperity of each country is realized by the world being free, democratic, and “ruled under the law”.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion Sunday Edition, October 06, 2019: Dear Sir, October 1st. now. The fate of the United States is in the hands of China and North Korea. China “flaunted” a “new nuclear missile” that could instantly destroy the “city of the US mainland”. In Hong Kong, the police “fired” “live ammunition” for “demonstrations seeking democratization”. The police made "Heart" the "Target". It is "murderous act". October 2nd. North Korea launched “SLBM” that Trump recognizes. North Korea ’s aim is to use a submarine to approach the US mainland and conduct a “nuclear missile attack”. There is no sense of crisis in the White House.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion


Sunday Edition, October 06, 2019: Dear Sir,
October 1st. now. The fate of the United States is in the hands of China and North Korea. China “flaunted” a “new nuclear missile” that could instantly destroy the “city of the US mainland”. In Hong Kong, the police “fired” “live ammunition” for “demonstrations seeking democratization”. The police made "Heart" the "Target". It is "murderous act". October 2nd. North Korea launched “SLBM” that Trump recognizes. North Korea ’s aim is to use a submarine to approach the US mainland and conduct a “nuclear missile attack”. There is no sense of crisis in the White House.


Part 1. The United States cannot “repel” this.
The US security system has become meaningless.
China got a huge dollar in trade with the United States.
China strengthened its arms with huge dollar funds from the United States.
Finally, China has developed a “ballistic missile” that can instantly destroy most US cities.
China “disclosed” “the missile” on October 1.
The current US missile interception system cannot protect the United States.
This new missile is from the money gained from a trade transaction with the United States.
All members of the White House fell into a Chinese honey trap.
"Trojan horse" was owned by China.

In Hong Kong, the police fired live ammunition for protesters seeking democratization.
The cop targeted the heart, not the gun.
It's just like murder.
The world does not help anyone.
The United Nations cannot function at all.
Hong Kong people have no choice but to call the Chinese and Taiwanese in mainland China to start a “revolution”.
In the Vietnam War, the Vietnamese won the strongest US military.
Now Hong Kongers should fight the strongest Chinese.

October 2nd. North Korea launched “SLBM”.
It fell into the Japanese EEZ.
President Trump has repeatedly stated that “small missiles” should not be considered a problem.
North Korea ’s aim is to use a submarine to approach the US mainland and conduct a “nuclear missile attack”.
However, it is said that North Korea ’s “submarine technology level” will be discovered using US and Japanese military technology.
However. In a few years, this technical problem will be solved.
President Trump grew up with "a child who doesn't know war".
When President Trump noticed, the US mainland would be surrounded by countless North Korean submarines.
If “Kim Jong-un Chairman” pushes the button, the US will instantly become “Sea of ​​Fire”.
Japan is not the only enemy country of “Remember Pearl Harbor”.
Both China and North Korea are East Asians.
The East Asian “strategy” is a “surprise strategy”!
Make the other party “relieved”. And it's a "strategy" to do a "surprise attack"!

now. What the White House needs to do is return the “competent members” who left the White House to the White House. Hurry up! No time!

Continue to next week.

Part 2. The Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office is “crushing” the crimes of prosecutors even in violation of the Immigration Control Act.
There are a lot of foreigners (uncountable).
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!
Victims are foreigners who “work illegally” in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.

They have been arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act and have been subjected to "criminal dispositions" such as "a prison term sentence" and "fine sentence". And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.
I wrote about this yesterday.

The prosecution has arrested a third party for charges of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is "I and" Kin Gungaku who is Chinese ".
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.
The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status” by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
So, as a crime against foreigner's Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor”, “Sinners supporting other crimes” of “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” apply.

The “Sin of Support” against Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Control Act is stipulated in “Sin Promoting Unlawful Employment” in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated in the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence by Submitting False Documents”
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.
Even if you obtain a status of residence with "false documents", it is not "illegal labor" if you work within the scope of "status of residence".
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me or the Philippine diplomat is an error in the “Applicable Law”.
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".
If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government, please request an investigation from ICC.

There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp