Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-14: Sehr geehrter Herr, Viele Menschen verstehen diesen Vorfall. Es ist ein Fehler im "anwendbaren Recht". Viele raten "Eine Bitte um Wiederholung". Eine Aufforderung zur erneuten Prüfung Eine Aufforderung zur erneuten Prüfung ist jedoch aufgrund eines Fehlers im geltenden Recht nicht zulässig. Siehe Artikel 435 Absätze 3 und 7 der Strafprozessordnung. Ich verklage also die Person, die in den Fall verwickelt ist. "Sinalität" ist "Verbrechen falscher Beschwerden" und "Missbrauch von Autorität durch einen speziellen Beamten".

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-10-14: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Viele Menschen verstehen diesen Vorfall. Es ist ein Fehler im "anwendbaren Recht". Viele raten "Eine Bitte um Wiederholung". Eine Aufforderung zur erneuten Prüfung Eine Aufforderung zur erneuten Prüfung ist jedoch aufgrund eines Fehlers im geltenden Recht nicht zulässig. Siehe Artikel 435 Absätze 3 und 7 der Strafprozessordnung. Ich verklage also die Person, die in den Fall verwickelt ist. "Sinalität" ist "Verbrechen falscher Beschwerden" und "Missbrauch von Autorität durch einen speziellen Beamten".


Teil 1. Japanisch wird weggelassen. Bitte überprüfen Sie die folgende Website.
Artikel 435 Gegen eine endgültige Entscheidung kann ein Antrag auf Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens gestellt werden
und bindendes Schuldurteil, wenn es im Interesse der Person eingereicht wird
Wer wurde für schuldig befunden und wann:

(i) Es wurde durch ein endgültiges und bindendes Urteil bewiesen, dass Dokumentarfilm
oder materielle Beweise, die im ursprünglichen Urteil als Beweise dienten, sind falsch
oder wurde geändert;

(ii) Es wurde durch ein endgültiges und bindendes Urteil bewiesen, dass Zeugnis,
Gutachten, Dolmetschen oder Übersetzen, die als Beweismittel dienten
im ursprünglichen Urteil war falsch;

(iii) Es wurde durch ein endgültiges und bindendes Urteil bewiesen, dass eine Person
wer für schuldig befunden wurde, wurde fälschlicherweise beschuldigt;
Dies gilt jedoch nur, wenn diese Person für schuldig befunden wurde
auf der Grundlage einer solchen falschen Anschuldigung;
(iv)

(iv) Eine Entscheidung, die im ursprünglichen Urteil als Beweismittel diente, wurde geändert
durch endgültiges und bindendes Urteil;

(v) In Bezug auf Fälle, in denen eine Person einer Straftat für schuldig befunden wurde
eines Patent-, Gebrauchsmuster-, Geschmacksmuster- oder Markenrechts,
eine Gerichtsentscheidung, die dieses Recht aufhebt, ist rechtskräftig geworden,
oder ein Urteil, das dieses Recht aufhebt, ergangen ist;

(vi) eindeutige Beweise, die das Gericht zu einem Freispruch oder einer Entlassung veranlassen sollten,
für die gerichtliche Anwaltskanzlei der Person, die verurteilt wurde,
oder lassen Sie das Gericht einen Strafbefehl erlassen
für die Person, für die die Strafe verhängt wurde
oder das Gericht dazu bringen, ein geringeres Verbrechen zu finden als das gefundene Verbrechen
im ursprünglichen Urteil oder

(vii) Es wurde durch ein endgültiges und bindendes Urteil bewiesen, dass ein Richter
der an dem ursprünglichen Urteil teilgenommen hat, ein Richter, der teilgenommen hat
bei der Erbringung von Nachweisen, die im ursprünglichen Urteil als Beweismittel gedient haben,
oder die Staatsanwaltschaft, der stellvertretende Beamte der Staatsanwaltschaft,
oder ein Polizeibeamter, der ein Dokument erstellt oder eine Erklärung abgegeben hat
die als Beweismittel im ursprünglichen Urteil diente, begangen ein Verbrechen
in Bezug auf seine / ihre Pflicht in dem Fall, sofern,
dass dies jedoch auf die Strafverfolgung gegen einen solchen Richter beschränkt sein soll,
Staatsanwaltschaft, stellvertretender Beamter der Staatsanwaltschaft,
oder richterlicher Polizeibeamter wurde vor Überstellung eingesetzt
des ursprünglichen Urteils, und als das ursprüngliche Gericht solche Tatsache nicht wusste.

Im Folgenden wird der falsche Name des Inhalts erläutert.
Ich habe es oft erklärt.
Der "Grund für die Straftat" in der Anklageschrift ist der Inhalt des Einwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4.
Siehe "Anklage".
"Anklage" ist die folgende Beschreibung.
1) Die Tatsache, dass der "reguläre Täter" gegen Artikel 70 "Unqualified Labour" des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstieß.
2) Die Tatsache, dass "Beklagte" "Arbeitsvertrag mit falschen Inhalten" an "Kriminelle" lieferte.
3) Die Tatsache, dass der „Rechte Täter“ einen Antrag auf „Aufenthaltsstatus“ mit der Anlage eines „falschen Arbeitsvertrags“ gestellt hat.
(Es gibt keine Beschreibung, aber da Sie den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben, ist dies Schritt 1).
"Angeklagter" ist die Person, die dem "Verbrecher" einen "falschen Arbeitsvertrag" zur Verfügung gestellt hat.

Wenn der „Verbrecher“ einen „Arbeitsvertrag mit falschem Inhalt“ anhängt und den Aufenthaltsstatus erhält
Es gibt eine Beschreibung im Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4.
Der Justizminister führt die folgende "administrative Disposition" durch. Es ist nicht (strafrechtliche Bestrafung).
1) Kündigen Sie Ihren Aufenthaltsstatus.
2) Befehl, das Land zu verlassen.
Sie bestraften diejenigen, die sich nicht an den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs „Sünder zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten“ schuldig gemacht hatten.

Daher ist die "Tat" der verbundenen Partei
"Verbrechen falscher Beschwerden" und Artikel 194 des Strafgesetzbuches
Es fällt unter "Amtsmissbrauch durch Sonderbeamte".
Wenn Sie schuldig sind, haben Sie Anspruch auf einen „Antrag auf Wiederholung“.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten andere „illegale Arbeit“ als „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für die Straftat“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-10-14: Monsieur, Beaucoup de gens comprennent cet incident. C'est une erreur de "loi applicable". Beaucoup conseillent "une demande de nouveau procès". Cependant, une requête en «nouvelle procédure» n'est pas autorisée en raison d'une erreur dans la «loi applicable». Voir article 435, paragraphes 3 et 7 du code de procédure pénale. Je poursuis donc la personne impliquée dans l'affaire. "Sin name" est "crimes de fausses plaintes" et "abus d'autorité par un fonctionnaire spécial"

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-10-14: Monsieur,
Beaucoup de gens comprennent cet incident. C'est une erreur de "loi applicable". Beaucoup conseillent "une demande de nouveau procès". Cependant, une requête en «nouvelle procédure» n'est pas autorisée en raison d'une erreur dans la «loi applicable». Voir article 435, paragraphes 3 et 7 du code de procédure pénale. Je poursuis donc la personne impliquée dans l'affaire. "Sin name" est "crimes de fausses plaintes" et "abus d'autorité par un fonctionnaire spécial"


Partie 1 Le japonais est omis. S'il vous plaît consulter le site Web suivant.
Article 435 Une requête en révision peut être formée contre une décision finale.
et exécutoire jugement de culpabilité, lorsqu'il est déposé dans l'intérêt de la personne
qui a été reconnu coupable et quand:

(i) Il a été prouvé par un jugement définitif et contraignant que le documentaire
ou une preuve matérielle qui a servi de preuve dans le jugement initial est fausse
ou a été modifié;

(ii) Il a été prouvé par un jugement définitif et contraignant que le témoignage,
expertise, interprétation ou traduction qui a servi de preuve
dans le jugement original était faux;

(iii) Il a été prouvé par un jugement définitif et contraignant qu'une personne
qui a été trouvé coupable a été faussement accusé;
cependant, cela ne sera le cas que lorsque cette personne aura été déclarée coupable
sur la base de cette fausse accusation;
(iv)

iv) Une décision ayant servi de preuve dans le jugement initial a été modifiée
par jugement définitif et contraignant;

v) Dans les cas où une personne a été déclarée coupable d'infraction pénale
d'un droit de brevet, d'un droit de modèle d'utilité, d'un droit de conception ou d'un droit de marque,
une décision de procès annulant un tel droit est devenue définitive,
ou un jugement qui a annulé ce droit a été rendu;

(vi) Des preuves claires qui devraient amener le tribunal à prononcer un acquittement ou un congédiement,
pour l'interdiction judiciaire à la personne qui a été condamnée,
ou faire que le tribunal rende une remise de peine
pour la personne à qui la peine a été infligée
ou faire en sorte que le tribunal trouve un crime moins grave que le crime constaté
dans le jugement initial, ou

(vii) Il a été prouvé par un jugement définitif et contraignant qu’un juge
qui a participé au jugement initial, un juge qui a participé
en produisant une preuve documentaire qui a servi de preuve dans le jugement initial,
ou le procureur, l'officier assistant du procureur,
ou officier de police judiciaire qui a compilé un document ou fait une déclaration
qui a servi de preuve dans le jugement initial, a commis un crime
en ce qui concerne son devoir dans l'affaire;
cependant, cela doit être limité au moment où les poursuites contre ce juge,
procureur, assistant du procureur,
ou officier de police judiciaire a été institué avant la restitution
du jugement initial, et lorsque le tribunal d'origine n'a pas su un tel fait.

Ce qui suit explique le faux nom du contenu.
J'ai expliqué plusieurs fois.
Le «motif du crime» dans l'acte d'accusation est le contenu de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Voir «Acte d'accusation».
"Acte d'accusation" est la description suivante.
1) Le fait que le «délinquant régulier» a violé l’article 70 «Travail non qualifié» de la Loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
2) Le fait que le "défendeur" ait fourni le "contrat de travail avec faux contenu" à "criminel".
3) Le fait que le «contrevenant de droit» ait déposé une demande de «statut de résident» avec la saisie d'un «faux contrat de travail».
(Il n'y a pas de description, mais puisque vous avez obtenu le statut de résidence, ce sera l'acte 1) ci-dessus.
Le «défendeur» est la personne qui a «fourni un faux contrat de travail» au «criminel».

Lorsque le "criminel" joint un "contrat de travail avec un contenu faux" et obtient le statut de résident
L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration contient une description.
Le ministre de la Justice exécute la «décision administrative» suivante. Ce n'est pas (punition pénale).
1) Annulez votre statut de résidence.
2) Ordre de quitter le pays.
Ils punissaient ceux qui n'étaient pas coupables aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal «Les pécheurs pour soutenir d'autres crimes».

Par conséquent, l’acte de la partie liée est
"Crimes de fausses plaintes" et article 194 du code pénal
Cela relève de «l'abus de pouvoir d'un fonctionnaire spécial».
Si vous êtes coupable, vous êtes admissible à une «demande de nouveau procès».

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration indiqué dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-14: Dear Sir, Japanese is omitted. Please check the following website. Article 435 A request for a retrial may be filed against a final and binding judgment of guilt, when filed in the interests of the person who has been found guilty, and when:

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-14: Dear Sir,
Many people understand this incident. It is an error in "applicable law". Many advise “A request for retrial”. However, a request for “retrial A request for retrial” is not allowed because of an error in the “applicable law”. See Article 435, Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code. So I am suing the person involved in the case. "Sin name" is "Crimes of False Complaints" and "abuse of authority by special public officer"


Part 1. Japanese is omitted. Please check the following website.
Article 435 A request for a retrial may be filed against a final and binding judgment of guilt,
when filed in the interests of the person who has been found guilty, and when:

(i) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that documentary
or material evidence which served as evidence
in the original judgment is false or has been altered;

(ii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that testimony,
expert evaluation, interpretation, or translation which served as evidence
in the original judgment was false;

(iii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a person
who has been found guilty was falsely accused; provided, however, that this shall only be when such person was found guilty on the basis of such false accusation;
(iv)

(iv) A decision which served as evidence in the original judgment has been altered
by final and binding judgment;

(v) With regard to cases where a person has been found guilty
of criminal infringement of a patent right, utility model right, design right,
or trademark right, a trial decision that voided such right has become final,
or a judgment that voided such right has been rendered;

(vi) Clear evidence which should make the court render an acquittal or a dismissal,
for judicial bar to the person who has been sentenced,
or make the court render a remission of punishment
for the person to whom punishment has been rendered
or make the court find a lesser crime than the crime
which was found in the original judgment; or,

(vii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a judge
who participated in the original judgment, a judge who participated
in making documentary evidence which served as evidence in the original judgment,
or the public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer who compiled a document or gave a statement
which served as evidence in the original judgment,
committed a crime with regard to his / her duty in the case; provided,
however, that this shall be limited to when prosecution against such judge ,
public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer was instituted before rendition of the original judgment,
and when the original court did not know such fact.

The following explains the false name of the content.
I have explained many times.
The “reason for crime” in the indictment is the content
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
See “Indictment”.
"Indictment" is the following description.
1) The fact that the “regular offender” violated Article 70 “Unqualified Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The fact that “Defendant” provided “Contract of Employment
with False Contents” to “Criminal”.
3) The fact that the “right offender” filed an application for “residence status”
with the attachment of a “false employment contract”. (There is no description,
but since you have obtained the status of residence, it will be act 1) above.
“Defendant” is the person who “provided a false employment contract” to the “criminal”.

When a “criminal” is attached with a “false employment contract”,
he / she will be listed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Law.
The Minister of Justice performs the following “Administrative Disposition”.
It is not (criminal punishment).
1) Cancel your status of residence.
2) Order to leave the country.
They punished those who were not guilty in Articles 60
and 62 of the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”.

Therefore, the “doing” of the parties concerned falls under Article 172
of the Criminal Code “Crimes of False Complaints”
and Article 194 of the Penal Code “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
If you are guilty, you are eligible for a “request for retrial”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."

To everyone in the world's media 2019-10-14: Dear Sir, Many people understand this incident. It is an error in "applicable law". Many advise “A request for retrial”. However, a request for “retrial A request for retrial” is not allowed because of an error in the “applicable law”. See Article 435, Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code. So I am suing the person involved in the case. "Sin name" is "Crimes of False Complaints" and "abuse of authority by special public officer"

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-14: Dear Sir,
Many people understand this incident. It is an error in "applicable law". Many advise “A request for retrial”. However, a request for “retrial A request for retrial” is not allowed because of an error in the “applicable law”. See Article 435, Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code. So I am suing the person involved in the case. "Sin name" is "Crimes of False Complaints" and "abuse of authority by special public officer"


Part 1. Japanese is omitted. Please check the following website.
Article 435 A request for a retrial may be filed against a final and binding judgment of guilt,
when filed in the interests of the person who has been found guilty, and when:

(i) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that documentary
or material evidence which served as evidence
in the original judgment is false or has been altered;

(ii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that testimony,
expert evaluation, interpretation, or translation which served as evidence
in the original judgment was false;

(iii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a person
who has been found guilty was falsely accused; provided, however, that this shall only be when such person was found guilty on the basis of such false accusation;
(iv)

(iv) A decision which served as evidence in the original judgment has been altered
by final and binding judgment;

(v) With regard to cases where a person has been found guilty
of criminal infringement of a patent right, utility model right, design right,
or trademark right, a trial decision that voided such right has become final,
or a judgment that voided such right has been rendered;

(vi) Clear evidence which should make the court render an acquittal or a dismissal,
for judicial bar to the person who has been sentenced,
or make the court render a remission of punishment
for the person to whom punishment has been rendered
or make the court find a lesser crime than the crime
which was found in the original judgment; or,

(vii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a judge
who participated in the original judgment, a judge who participated
in making documentary evidence which served as evidence in the original judgment,
or the public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer who compiled a document or gave a statement
which served as evidence in the original judgment,
committed a crime with regard to his / her duty in the case; provided,
however, that this shall be limited to when prosecution against such judge ,
public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer was instituted before rendition of the original judgment,
and when the original court did not know such fact.

The following explains the false name of the content.
I have explained many times.
The “reason for crime” in the indictment is the content
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
See “Indictment”.
"Indictment" is the following description.
1) The fact that the “regular offender” violated Article 70 “Unqualified Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The fact that “Defendant” provided “Contract of Employment
with False Contents” to “Criminal”.
3) The fact that the “right offender” filed an application for “residence status”
with the attachment of a “false employment contract”. (There is no description,
but since you have obtained the status of residence, it will be act 1) above.
“Defendant” is the person who “provided a false employment contract” to the “criminal”.

When a “criminal” is attached with a “false employment contract”,
he / she will be listed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Law.
The Minister of Justice performs the following “Administrative Disposition”.
It is not (criminal punishment).
1) Cancel your status of residence.
2) Order to leave the country.
They punished those who were not guilty in Articles 60
and 62 of the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”.

Therefore, the “doing” of the parties concerned falls under Article 172
of the Criminal Code “Crimes of False Complaints”
and Article 194 of the Penal Code “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
If you are guilty, you are eligible for a “request for retrial”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Proposal from Japanese October 12, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “min Shin nakuba tatazu” is an important word. Dear Sir, After the meeting, the six European countries including Britain, France and Germany issued a joint statement blaming North Korea's (SLBM) launch, saying that “it was a violation of the Security Council resolution that undermined regional security and stability”. The Trump administration once again turned away from the international community. Europe will no longer defend President Trump on suspicion of Ukraine. Americans should cooperate with the international community. Gambare!

Proposal from Japanese

October 12, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “min Shin nakuba tatazu” is an important word.

Dear Sir,

After the meeting, the six European countries including Britain, France and Germany issued a joint statement blaming North Korea's (SLBM) launch, saying that “it was a violation of the Security Council resolution that undermined regional security and stability”. The Trump administration once again turned away from the international community. Europe will no longer defend President Trump on suspicion of Ukraine. Americans should cooperate with the international community. Gambare!

Part 1. The statement of intention as the Security Council was postponed. North Korean Ambassador Kimson met with some media such as Reuters on the 7th, and if the Security Council took up the issue of ballistic missile launch, “it will drive our self-defense consciousness further,” He said "prevent free action".

North Korea expressed its view that it would well understand that the United States is behind the impure movement when it held the talks on the 8th.

I think the Trump administration succumbed to North Korea's pressure.

I think Trump will be the “tactics” he chose for next year's presidential election.

Recently, the Americans seem to have made a judgment different from that of President Trump.

There is a saying “min Shin nakuba tatazu” in Chinese sayings.

Below is an English translation of “min Shin nakuba tatazu”.

Without the trust of the people, there can be no government.

It is a conversation in “The Analects of Confucius”.

“Sikou” of disciple asks “Confucius” about “politics”.

“Confucius” replied, “Provide enough food, good armament, and trust people.”

(The true meaning of this explanation is significant). There is a longer commentary.

I think North Korea's “Chairman Kim Jong-Un” also knows.

I don't think that he understands this meaning and is politics.

I don't think President Trump knows this.

There are many researchers in the United States who are studying "theories".

It is important to know what this means if President Trump wants to be “re-elected”.

The important thing is to understand and execute.

It's great to understand all of the "language" if you have time.

President Trump should understand “min Shin nakuba tatazu”.

And if you do politics, you can get along with the international community.

All Americans will respect President Trump,

And will follow the president.

Will continue tomorrow

Part 2. In the United States, I “suggest” to build a “special zone” along the border with Mexico.

See April 13, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition.

Japan's immigration policy is worse than the United States.

Japanese immigration law is similar to American immigration law.

America's prosperity is realized by the world being free, democratic, and "ruled under the law".

I seriously seek the rule of law. Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

There are many American victims.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.j

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion Sunday edition, October 13, 2019: Dear Sir, “Foreign exchange clauses” were “fake news” by the White House. The representatives of both the US and Japan officially signed the Japan-US trade agreement in Washington on the 7th. “Foreign exchange clauses” were excluded. Japan is short of commercial rice. In the future, imports from “Thailand” will increase. The US abandoned car exports. Car imports from European countries will increase.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion


Sunday edition, October 13, 2019: Dear Sir,
“Foreign exchange clauses” were “fake news” by the White House.
The representatives of both the US and Japan officially signed the Japan-US trade agreement
in Washington on the 7th. “Foreign exchange clauses” were excluded.
Japan is short of commercial rice.
In the future, imports from “Thailand” will increase. The US abandoned car exports.
Car imports from European countries will increase.

Part 1. In Korea, Mexico, and Canada,
where trade negotiations with the United States were conducted prior to Japan,
the exchange rate of the country's currency
against the dollar continues to move flexibly during the negotiation period
and after the agreement is concluded.

Looking at the “precedents” of Korea, Mexico,
and Canada that were forced to “introduce” the “document
of agreement equivalent to foreign exchange clauses” and “text of the treaty”,
they agreed even during the negotiation period Even after the formation,
the exchange rate of “the currency of those countries”
against the dollar continues to move flexibly depending on the market mechanism,
and there is no “trace” that seems to have restricted
the movement toward currency depreciation.
I understand that the US demands China, but it doesn't make sense to demand it from allies.
The US would have noticed this.

It is said that “there is no winner” in the “Japan-US Trade Agreement”.
But I think "Japan won".
Both rice and cars are as insisted by Japan.
This is because “Japan buys” “US corn” that is not imported by China,
and “Election measures” for US corn farmers were made.
Japan is the country that imports the most corn in the United States.
Will it be discarded this year? Will 2.5 million tons
of additional imports continue next year?
This is a problem!
All decisions of the White House are “moved” by “money”.
The United States is a “friend who needs a lot of money”.

The cause of the US trade deficit is that it does not make “export efforts”.
American cars sell in Japan if you make an effort.
I think that sales of European cars will increase if US cars are not imported.
The reason is that sales efforts are left to the Japanese.
Nissan and Renault sales are falling.
I think it should be “equal investment ratio”.
You should sell "Renault cars" at Nissan dealers.
"Nissan cars" should be sold at Renault dealers.
I think “GM” and “Ford” will disappear.
I think the world will be concentrated in Volkswagen, Renault Nissan and Toyota.
I think Renault Nissan should withdraw from China and transfer production to Europe.
To that end, please build a “special zone” in Europe.

Continue to next week.


Part 2. The Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office is "crushing" the prosecutor's crimes even
in violation of the Immigration Control Act.
There are a lot of foreigners (uncountable).
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!
Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.

They have been arrested for “illegal labor” under Article 70 of the Immigration Act
and have been subjected to “criminal dispositions” such as “a prison term sentence”
and “fine sentence”.
And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.
I wrote about this yesterday.

The prosecution has arrested a third party for charges
of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is "I and" Kin Gungaku who is Chinese ".
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.
The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
So, as a crime against foreigner's Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor”,
“Sinners supporting other crimes” of “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” apply.

The “Sin of Support” against Article 70 “Illegal Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act is stipulated in “Sin Promoting Unlawful Employment”
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.
Even if you obtain a status of residence with "false documents",
it is not "illegal labor" if you work within the scope of "status of residence".
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in the “Applicable Law”.
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".
If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.

There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion October 13, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “Europe should be“ solidarity ”to protect democracy and win the US and China in economic wars.” Dear Sir, In the future, Europe must have an economic war with the United States and China. The UK withdrawal issue should be finalized with UK proposals. Although EU will be dissatisfied, democracy is to respect the results of the UK referendum. The EU must make a concession to protect "British and world democracy".

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

October 13, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition:

“Europe should be“ solidarity ”to protect democracy and win the US and China in economic wars.”

Dear Sir,

In the future, Europe must have an economic war with the United States and China. The UK withdrawal issue should be finalized with UK proposals. Although EU will be dissatisfied, democracy is to respect the results of the UK referendum. The EU must make a concession to protect "British and world democracy".

Part 1. October 8, 2019 According to Bloomberg, "John British Prime Minister" told "Germany Merkel" that "agreement on withdrawal" is "essentially impossible".

However, if the EU asks Northern Ireland to stay within the “Union of Customs” of the European Union (EU).

The two leaders talked over the phone on the morning of the 8th.

Prior to that, Spectator magazine “published” “A text message of the officials of the prime minister's mansion” revealed that the Johnson administration was preparing for a “breakdown of negotiations”.

The British government says it will seek consultations with the Irish government and the EU as soon as possible “after leaving the EU”.

That's right, "After leaving the EU" is first.

I think the details should be discussed after leaving.

After Britain leaves the EU, Europe must have an economic war with the United States and China.

The US Trade Representative (USTR) announced on October 2 that, in response to the result of the arbitration by the WTO regarding the EU's dispute regarding subsidy contributions to the major European airline Airbus, The company announced that it will launch sanctions duties on October 18th for imports of approximately $ 7.5 billion worth of EU-origin products.

Even after leaving the EU, the UK and the EU need to work together to tackle economic wars with the United States and China.

In the aircraft industry, “Boeing” in the US and “Airbus” in four European countries remained.

Europe must win the United States in this economic war.

I think so.

I think Europe has a chance to become one again in this aircraft war.

For Europe to “win” the United States, it is “overwhelming” the United States in terms of “the scale of the economy”.

To do so, it is necessary to increase GDP.

The prosperity of the United States exceeded that of Europe in terms of “immigration policy”.

However, the Trump administration is pursuing a policy of “emigration exclusion”.

This is an opportunity for Europe.

European countries should promote “economy” by building “special zones” within their own countries, and simultaneously “establishing” “acceptance of migrants and refugees” and “work and safety of their own people”.

In Europe, please defend “democracy”.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. We propose to build “special zones” in Europe and other countries.

Please read along with suggestions to the US (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see

Prosperity of each country is realized by the world being free, democratic, and “ruled under the law”.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Opinion from Japanese Saturday edition, October 12, 2019: Dear Sir, We were amazed by the US Army !! All US Army information would have leaked to China! The US Army uses a Chinese drone “Small drone system”. President Trump! You are fired! The US is "dead". The United States is stupid!

Opinion from Japanese


Saturday edition, October 12, 2019: Dear Sir,
We were amazed by the US Army !! All US Army information would have leaked to China! The US Army uses a Chinese drone “Small drone system”. President Trump! You are fired! The US is "dead". The United States is stupid!


Part 1. This news is not fake news.
The news source is below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=VFk10L_JQ4Y

The tension between the US and China is growing.
The US Department of Defense panics over China's dependence on technology!
This is because the US military relies on the small drone “small drone system” in China.
What are the measures to cut off the Pentagon's dependence on “Chinese products”?
Welcome to “China Unsensed”. I ’m Chris Chapel, the caster.

Professor Michael Horowitz from the University of Pennsylvania.
"Drones flying with four propellers are cheap,
so it's not a big deal if they crash or lose sight."
The drone here is called "Small drone system" or "UAS".
The US military is mainly used for reconnaissance missions.
However, the drone can cause death even though it is small.

All you need is a really simple device.
This is a device for dropping the warhead.
Secure and close the bottom of the drone side.
All you have to do is under $ 100, just attach it to the bottom of the drone.
So if you send an activation command to the device, the warhead will be dropped.

The Department of Defense is not concerned about Chinese troops sending drone groups
and attacking the mainland.
That's what Amazon has already done ...
The Department of Defense is worried about Chinese-made drones
that the US government purchases at its own will.

In particular, this Chinese technology may incorporate security flaws
that may help the Chinese army to gain an advantage during battle.
For example, a secret code that sends confidential information to China.
According to the 2017 memo, the Department of Defense ordered the US military to stop
using the DJI drone in China.
“The awareness of cyber vulnerabilities has increased”.
The Department of Defense did not reveal details of the threat to national security.

Here are some comments.
Already, the Chinese Communist Party has taken “hostile action” such as copying Western weapons
and electronic attacks.
The era has already entered the New Cold War.
Globalism eventually resulted in “only disaster”.

Because the previous administration was “good friends with China”.
Especially those who look good in yellow dresses.

Boycott all the Chinese Made here in the USA !!
Wow, we cannot buy the Christmas tree and nativity scene? Lol 😂

What do you think, guys?
Is this related to the presidential election?
Is the presidential election funding from China?
The White House should be completely “separated” from the Chinese “honey trap”!

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. Many foreigners have been arrested for violating immigration law
in violation of international law.
(I can't count).
Korean, Chinese, Filippin, American, `` Everyone '' from all over the world!
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!

Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.
They were arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
Received "criminal disposition" such as "fine penalty".
And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.

A third party has been arrested on charges of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor"
of foreigners.
The victim is me and “Kin Gungaku who is Chinese”.
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.

The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
Therefore, as a crime against foreigner immigration law Article 70 "illegal labor"
"Crime that supported other crimes" in "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code" applies.

Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor” is “sin of support”
It is stipulated in “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.

The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.

Even if you get a status of residence with "false documents",
If you work within the scope of your status of residence, it is not “illegal labor”.
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in the “Applicable Law”.
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".

If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yashiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/POTD-July-10-1200x800.jpg

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

最高领导人金正恩。 2019-10-11：亲爱的先生， 有“国民饮食议员”“阻碍”“国家权利”。 他说：“不要发送此电子邮件！”我认为“他想粉碎这一事件”。 它成为“日本政治”的暗示。政治家“压制人权”是不可接受的。 发布您的电子邮件地址。 亲自调查并在媒体上发布此“立法者姓名”和“隶属党”。

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-10-11：亲爱的先生，
有“国民饮食议员”“阻碍”“国家权利”。
他说：“不要发送此电子邮件！”我认为“他想粉碎这一事件”。
它成为“日本政治”的暗示。政治家“压制人权”是不可接受的。
发布您的电子邮件地址。
亲自调查并在媒体上发布此“立法者姓名”和“隶属党”。


第一部分我认为他今天仍然可以获得免费的电子邮件地址。

如果您不需要电子邮件，可以回复电子邮件或
您应该使用“电子邮件地址”请求“取消邮件传递”。
到现在为止，国会议员还没有要求“停止分发”。
但是，要求发送目的地的“更改电子邮件地址”。

使馆通过“邮件或电话”收到了两个“邮件停止请求”。
我接到了鼓励电话。

我们收到了两封要求美国媒体“退订”的电子邮件。
我收到了几封“更改我的电子邮件地址的请求”电子邮件。
我收到了很多“鼓励电子邮件”。
对不起，我需要更多时间来撰写文章。
我期待收到“每日电子邮件”。

我每天都会发送很多电子邮件。
而且我收到很多电子邮件。
我可能不小心删除了收到的电子邮件
因此，我在电子邮件中写了三个电子邮件地址。
您总是可以收到一封电子邮件，要求“取消电子邮件传递”。

匿名电子邮件信息。
从上方
“发件人的电子邮件地址”
“发送日期”
“邮件ID”
“用户代理”

fnm32136@bcaoo.com
2019年七月22日星期一08:35:24 +0900
<Be4919c2-3718-9d0d-f05a-cd0533f5edf6@gol.com>
Mozilla / 5.0（Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv：60.0）Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.8.0

eyw51698@bcaoo.com
2019年七月15日星期一09:29:09 +0900
<6ed23c27-7051-d90e-a607-388b1c55e2d5@prontonet.ne.jp>
Mozilla / 5.0（Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv：60.0）Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.8.0

m1414704739@gomen-da.com
2019年8月23日，星期五06:32:28 +0900
<8cc8cba9-fa33-f204-4ac6-ebe77710f313@gol.com>
Mozilla / 5.0（Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv：60.0）Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.8.0


rhy85876@tuofs.com
2019年九月9日星期一06:51:02 +0900
<180ef0b4-507d-e546-e17b-de9e58dc9229@gol.com>
Mozilla / 5.0（Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv：60.0）Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.9.0

pyg72334@bcaoo.com
2019年9月26日，星期四06:09:08 +0900
<362e2701-a589-bf4f-3a65-423bcdf653de@gol.com>
Mozilla / 5.0（Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv：60.0）Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.9.0

我将向您发送此电子邮件的所有标题信息。
用手检查真相。
请用手发表该“立法者姓名”和“所属政党”。
或与我联络。
这是学习日本政客技能的重要“新闻提示”。
我知道这位“议员”的答案。
“我不这样做。”
“秘书未经允许就做了什么”
“这是秘书的责任。”
现在大家来看看“日本政客喜剧节目”。

继续下周。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持，以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。

但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我，金国阁，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
将《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”适用于《移民管制法》第70条是“疯狂的”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广


请询问最高领导人金正恩（*******）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。和批准。


我的信息******** ****

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件

To President Trump 2019-10-11: Dear Sir, There are “National Diet members” who “hindrance” the “National Rights”. He says "Don't send this email!" I think "He wants to crush this incident". It becomes a hint of "Japanese politics". “Repression of human rights” by politicians is unacceptable. Publish your email address. Investigate by your hand and publish this "name of legislator" and "affiliation party" in the media.

To President Trump


2019-10-11: Dear Sir,
There are “National Diet members” who “hindrance” the “National Rights”.
He says "Don't send this email!" I think "He wants to crush this incident".
It becomes a hint of "Japanese politics".
“Repression of human rights” by politicians is unacceptable.
Publish your email address. Investigate by your hand and publish this "name of legislator"
and "affiliation party" in the media.


Part 1. I think he still gets a free email address today.

If you don't need email, you can reply to email or
You should request "cancel mail delivery" with "email address".
Until now, there has been no request for “stop distribution” from the Diet members.
However, there is a request for "change email address" of the destination.

There were two “mail stop requests” from the embassy by “mail or telephone”.
I received a phone call for encouragement.

We received two emails requesting “unsubscribe” from the US media.
I received several "requests to change my email address" emails.
I received a lot of “encouragement emails”.
I need more time to make an article, sorry.
I ’m looking forward to receiving “daily email”.

I deliver many emails every day.
And I receive many emails.
I might accidentally delete received email
So I write three email addresses in the email.
You can always receive an email requesting “cancel email delivery”.

Anonymous email information.
From above
"Sender's email address"
"Send date"
"MessageID"
"User Agent"

fnm32136@bcaoo.com
Mon, 22 Jul 2019 08:35:24 +0900
<be4919c2-3718-9d0d-f05a-cd0533f5edf6@gol.com>
Mozilla / 5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv: 60.0) Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.8.0

eyw51698@bcaoo.com
Mon, 15 Jul 2019 09:29:09 +0900
<6ed23c27-7051-d90e-a607-388b1c55e2d5@prontonet.ne.jp>
Mozilla / 5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv: 60.0) Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.8.0

m1414704739@gomen-da.com
Fri, 23 Aug 2019 06:32:28 +0900
<8cc8cba9-fa33-f204-4ac6-ebe77710f313@gol.com>
Mozilla / 5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv: 60.0) Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.8.0


rhy85876@tuofs.com
Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:51:02 +0900
<180ef0b4-507d-e546-e17b-de9e58dc9229@gol.com>
Mozilla / 5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv: 60.0) Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.9.0

pyg72334@bcaoo.com
Thu, 26 Sep 2019 06:09:08 +0900
<362e2701-a589-bf4f-3a65-423bcdf653de@gol.com>
Mozilla / 5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv: 60.0) Gecko / 20100101 Thunderbird / 60.9.0

I will send you all the header information for this email.
Check the truth with your hands.
Please publish this "name of the legislator" and "affiliated political party" with your hands.
Or contact me.
This is an important “news tip” for learning the skills of Japanese politicians.
I know the answer of this “Parliamentarian”.
"I don't do it."
"What the secretary did without permission"
"This is the secretary's responsibility."
Now, everyone! Check out the “Japanese politician comedy show”.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ********



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********