Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-15: Sehr geehrter Herr, In Fällen von Verstößen gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz verschwören sich Polizisten, Staatsanwälte und viele Richter, um die „geltenden Gesetze“ zu „verletzen“. Anwälte halten sich an „illegale Handlungen“ von Staatsanwälten und Richtern. Die Medien haben mit der Polizei zusammengearbeitet, um "falsche" Meldungen zu machen und ihre "Verbrechen" zu "unterstützen". Vor dem Krieg in Japan war es "Nationalsozialismus". Japan ist in dieselbe Zeit des „Nationalsozialismus“ zurückgekehrt wie die „Nazipartei“. Die internationale Gemeinschaft sollte Japan "warnen".

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-10-15: Sehr geehrter Herr,
In Fällen von Verstößen gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz verschwören sich Polizisten, Staatsanwälte und viele Richter, um die „geltenden Gesetze“ zu „verletzen“. Anwälte halten sich an „illegale Handlungen“ von Staatsanwälten und Richtern. Die Medien haben mit der Polizei zusammengearbeitet, um "falsche" Meldungen zu machen und ihre "Verbrechen" zu "unterstützen". Vor dem Krieg in Japan war es "Nationalsozialismus". Japan ist in dieselbe Zeit des „Nationalsozialismus“ zurückgekehrt wie die „Nazipartei“. Die internationale Gemeinschaft sollte Japan "warnen".


Teil 1. Das Folgende ist die Tatsache der Anklage gegen den Richter.
(Es handelt sich um eine strafbare Handlung des Missbrauchs des Richterrechts eines Sonderbeamten, der einen Haftbefehl erlassen hat.)
Ungefähr im Juni 2014 waren Filipinos in einem Landschaftsbauunternehmen in Tokio in nicht qualifizierten Tätigkeiten tätig.
Die Strafe dafür ist
1) Das philippinische Volk unterliegt dem Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 70 (unqualifizierte Arbeit).
2) Die Landschaftsgestaltungsfirma ist Artikel 72-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes (ein Verbrechen, das illegale Arbeit fördert).
Es gibt keine Entschuldigung dafür, Artikel 72-2 in der 2010 Immigration Control Amendment nicht zu kennen.
Die dreijährige Nachfrist für die Umsetzung dieses Gesetzes ist abgelaufen.
Zu diesem Zweck wurde ein „Resident Status Card“ -System eingeführt.

Die Landschaftsgärtnerei hat die Philippinen illegal angeheuert.
(Es gibt keine Entschuldigung.)
Die Polizei nimmt Landschaftsbauunternehmen nicht nach Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes fest.

Die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft sind jedoch die philippinischen Einwanderungsgesetze Artikel 22-4-4
"Konzentriert" auf den Akt der "Entsorgung der Löschung des Aufenthaltsstatus".
Ursprünglich sollte es dem Justizminister „gemeldet“ werden, aber sie hatten einen Exploit.
Daher wurde das folgende Szenario entwickelt.
1) Das philippinische Volk erhielt vom Fahrer der philippinischen Botschaft einen „Lügen-Fälschungs-Arbeitsvertrag“.
2) Auf diese Weise konnten die Philippinen den "Aufenthaltsstatus" erlangen.
3) Die Philippinen konnten also in Japan leben.
4) Das philippinische Volk konnte also illegal arbeiten.
Also gaben die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft dem philippinischen Volk einen „falschen Arbeitsvertrag“.
"Verwendet" das Botschaftspersonal (Fahrer), das "zur Verfügung gestellt" hat.

Botschaftsmitarbeiter (Fahrer) sind „Unterstützer“ im Sinne von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Das Botschaftspersonal (Fahrer) sollte sich auch beim Justizminister „melden“.
Die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft "missbrauchen" jedoch "falsch", ohne "zu melden".
Der "Unterstützer" in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes wurde durch den "Unterstützer" in Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes ersetzt.
Die Polizei stellte daraufhin einen „Antrag auf Festnahme“ gegen das „Gericht“ mit einem falschen „Sündennamen“.

Der Richter wies nicht auf Verstöße gegen das „anwendbare Recht“ hin.
Der Richter führte eine „Sondergewinnberechnung“ durch.
Und der Richter erließ illegal einen "Haftbefehl".
Polizeibeamte "drückten" "Entscheidungsfreiheit" von "Botschaften Beamten" durch "Haftbefehl".
Er "verhaftete und sperrte" das "Botschaftspersonal" ein.
Der Richter wollte "Erfolge" als Richter durch "Huckepack" für Polizeibeamte erzielen, die "Erfolge" erzielen wollten.
Dies ist ein „organisiertes Verbrechen“.
Daher führte die Polizei eine „Informationsmanipulation“ mithilfe der Medien durch.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten andere „illegale Arbeit“ als „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für die Straftat“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-15: Dear Sir, In cases of violation of immigration law, police officers, prosecutors and many judges conspire to “violate” the “applicable laws”. Lawyers are obedient to “illegal acts” of prosecutors and judges. The media collaborated with the police to “report false” and “support” their “crimes”. Before the war in Japan, it was “national socialism”. Japan has returned to the same “national socialism” era as the “Nazi Party”. The international community should “warn” Japan.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-15: Dear Sir,
In cases of violation of immigration law, police officers, prosecutors and many judges conspire to “violate” the “applicable laws”. Lawyers are obedient to “illegal acts” of prosecutors and judges. The media collaborated with the police to “report false” and “support” their “crimes”. Before the war in Japan, it was “national socialism”. Japan has returned to the same “national socialism” era as the “Nazi Party”. The international community should “warn” Japan.


Part 1. The following is the fact of the charges against the judge.
(It is a criminal fact of the abuse of special civil servant's right
of judge who issued an arrest warrant.)
Around June 2014, Filipinos were working
in non-qualified activities at a landscaping company in Tokyo.
The punishment for this fact is
1) Philippine people are guilty of immigration law Article 70 (unqualified labor).
2) The landscaping company is Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes illegal labor).
There is no excuse for not knowing Article 72-2 in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
The three-year grace period for implementing this law has ended.
For this purpose, a “resident status card” system was introduced.

The landscaping company hired the Philippines illegally.
(There is no excuse.)
Police do not arrest landscaping companies under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

However, the police and the prosecutor have “focused on” that the Filipinos acted
under the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Disposal of Status of Residence”.
Originally, it should be “reported” to the Minister
of Justice, but they came up with an exploit.
Therefore, the following scenario was devised.
1) The Philippine people were provided with a “lie fake employment contract”
by the “Philippine Embassy staff driver”.
2) So the Philippines were able to obtain “resident status”.
3) So the Philippines were able to live in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to work illegally.
So police and prosecutors “use” the embassy staff (drivers)
who “provided” “false employment contracts” to the Filipinos.

Embassy staff (drivers) are “supporters” in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law.
The embassy staff (driver) should also “report” to the Minister of Justice.
However, police and the prosecution “misapply misused” without “reporting”.
The “supporter” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act has been replaced
with the “supporter” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The police then made a “request for arrest” against the “court” with a false “sin name”.

The judge did not point out violations of the “applicable law”.
The judge made a “special profit calculation”.
And the judge illegally issued an “arrest warrant”.
Police officers "squeezed" "freedom of decision-making" of "embassies officials"
by "arrest warrant".
He “Arrested and confined” the “Embassy staff”.
The judge wanted to get “achievements” as a judge
by “piggybacking” to police officers who wanted to get “achievements”.
This is an “organized crime”.
So the police performed “information manipulation” using the media.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-10-15: Dear Sir, In cases of violation of immigration law, police officers, prosecutors and many judges conspire to “violate” the “applicable laws”. Lawyers are obedient to “illegal acts” of prosecutors and judges. The media collaborated with the police to “report false” and “support” their “crimes”. Before the war in Japan, it was “national socialism”. Japan has returned to the same “national socialism” era as the “Nazi Party”. The international community should “warn” Japan.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-15: Dear Sir,
In cases of violation of immigration law, police officers, prosecutors and many judges conspire to “violate” the “applicable laws”. Lawyers are obedient to “illegal acts” of prosecutors and judges. The media collaborated with the police to “report false” and “support” their “crimes”. Before the war in Japan, it was “national socialism”. Japan has returned to the same “national socialism” era as the “Nazi Party”. The international community should “warn” Japan.


Part 1. The following is the fact of the charges against the judge.
(It is a criminal fact of the abuse of special civil servant's right
of judge who issued an arrest warrant.)
Around June 2014, Filipinos were working
in non-qualified activities at a landscaping company in Tokyo.
The punishment for this fact is
1) Philippine people are guilty of immigration law Article 70 (unqualified labor).
2) The landscaping company is Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act
 (a crime that promotes illegal labor).
There is no excuse for not knowing Article 72-2 in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
The three-year grace period for implementing this law has ended.
For this purpose, a “resident status card” system was introduced.

The landscaping company hired the Philippines illegally.
(There is no excuse.)
Police do not arrest landscaping companies under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

However, the police and the prosecutor have “focused on” that the Filipinos acted
under the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Disposal of Status of Residence”.
Originally, it should be “reported” to the Minister
of Justice, but they came up with an exploit.
Therefore, the following scenario was devised.
1) The Philippine people were provided with a “lie fake employment contract”
by the “Philippine Embassy staff driver”.
2) So the Philippines were able to obtain “resident status”.
3) So the Philippines were able to live in Japan.
4) So the Philippine people were able to work illegally.
So police and prosecutors “use” the embassy staff (drivers)
who “provided” “false employment contracts” to the Filipinos.

Embassy staff (drivers) are “supporters” in Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law.
The embassy staff (driver) should also “report” to the Minister of Justice.
However, police and the prosecution “misapply misused” without “reporting”.
The “supporter” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act has been replaced
with the “supporter” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The police then made a “request for arrest” against the “court” with a false “sin name”.

The judge did not point out violations of the “applicable law”.
The judge made a “special profit calculation”.
And the judge illegally issued an “arrest warrant”.
Police officers "squeezed" "freedom of decision-making" of "embassies officials"
by "arrest warrant".
He “Arrested and confined” the “Embassy staff”.
The judge wanted to get “achievements” as a judge
by “piggybacking” to police officers who wanted to get “achievements”.
This is an “organized crime”.
So the police performed “information manipulation” using the media.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。 2019-10-14：尊敬的先生， 许多人了解此事件。这是“适用法律”中的错误。许多人建议“重审请求”。但是，由于“适用法律”的错误，不允许进行“重审。见《刑事诉讼法》第435条第3和第7款。因此，我正在起诉涉案人员。 “罪名”是“虚假指控罪”和“特别公职人员滥用职权”

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-10-14：尊敬的先生，
许多人了解此事件。这是“适用法律”中的错误。许多人建议“重审请求”。但是，由于“适用法律”的错误，不允许进行“重审。见《刑事诉讼法》第435条第3和第7款。因此，我正在起诉涉案人员。 “罪名”是“虚假指控罪”和“特别公职人员滥用职权”


第一部分日语被省略。请检查以下网站。
第435条重审请求可以针对终局提出
出于个人利益提出的具有约束力的有罪判决
被判有罪的人，以及何时：

（i）通过最终的具有约束力的判决证明
或作为原始判决证据的重大证据是错误的
或已被更改；

（ii）通过最终的具有约束力的判决证明，
专家评估，解释或翻译作为证据
最初的判断是错误的；

（iii）通过最终且具有约束力的判决已证明某人
被判有罪的人被错误地指控；提供，
但是，只有当该人被判有罪时，才应如此
基于这种虚假指控；
（iv）

（iv）作为原始判决证据的决定已被更改
通过最终且具有约束力的判断；

（v）关于被认定犯有刑事侵权罪的案件
专利权，实用新型权，设计权或商标权，
使该权利无效的审判决定已成为最终决定，
或作出使该权利无效的判决；

（vi）明确的证据应使法院宣布无罪或解雇，
对于被判刑的人的司法禁令，
或要求法院减轻处罚
对于受到惩罚的人
或使法院认定的罪行比被认定的罪行少
根据原始判断；或，

（vii）通过最终的具有约束力的判决证明，法官
参加原始判决的法官
在提供书面证据作为原始判决的证据时，
或检察官，检察官的助理人员，
或汇编文件或发表声明的司法警察
作为原始判决的证据，构​​成犯罪
关于他/她在案件中的职责；
但是，仅限于起诉该法官时，
检察官，检察官助理
或在引渡前成立司法警察
原始判决，以及当初法院不知道该事实时。

以下说明内容的虚假名称。
我已经解释了很多次。
起诉书中的“犯罪原因”是《移民法》第22-4-4条的内容。
请参阅“起诉书”。
以下是“起诉书”的描述。
1）“权利人”违反了《移民控制法》第70条“不合格劳动”。
2）“被告”向“犯罪”提供了“内容虚假的雇佣合同”。
3）“权利人”提出了“居住身份”申请，并附有“虚假雇佣合同”。
（没有描述，但是由于您已经获得了居留身份，因此将成为行为1）。
“被告”是向“犯罪分子”“提供虚假的雇佣合同”的人。

当“犯罪分子”附上“内容虚假的劳动合同”并取得居留身份时
《移民法》第22-4-4条有一个描述。
司法部长进行以下“行政处分”。不是（刑事处罚）。
1）取消您的居留身份。
2）命令离开该国。
他们惩处了《刑法》“支持其他罪行的罪人”第60条和第62条中无罪的人。

因此，关联方的“契据”是
“虚假投诉罪”和《刑法》第194条
它属于“特别公职人员滥用职权”的范畴。
如果您有罪，则符合“重审要求”。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持，以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。

但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我，金国阁，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《刑法》第60条和第62条与《移民管制法》第70条相对
“申请”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广


请询问最高领导人金正恩（*）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。批准


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump 2019-10-14: Dear Sir, Therefore, the “doing” of the parties concerned falls under Article 172 of the Criminal Code “Crimes of False Complaints” and Article 194 of the Penal Code “abuse of authority by special public officer”. If you are guilty, you are eligible for a “request for retrial”.

To President Trump


2019-10-14: Dear Sir,
Many people understand this incident. It is an error in "applicable law". Many advise “A request for retrial”. However, a request for “retrial A request for retrial” is not allowed because of an error in the “applicable law”. See Article 435, Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code. So I am suing the person involved in the case. "Sin name" is "Crimes of False Complaints" and "abuse of authority by special public officer"


Part 1. Japanese is omitted. Please check the following website.
Article 435 A request for a retrial may be filed against a final and binding judgment of guilt,
when filed in the interests of the person who has been found guilty, and when:

(i) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that documentary
or material evidence which served as evidence
in the original judgment is false or has been altered;

(ii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that testimony,
expert evaluation, interpretation, or translation which served as evidence
in the original judgment was false;

(iii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a person
who has been found guilty was falsely accused; provided, however, that this shall only be when such person was found guilty on the basis of such false accusation;
(iv)

(iv) A decision which served as evidence in the original judgment has been altered
by final and binding judgment;

(v) With regard to cases where a person has been found guilty
of criminal infringement of a patent right, utility model right, design right,
or trademark right, a trial decision that voided such right has become final,
or a judgment that voided such right has been rendered;

(vi) Clear evidence which should make the court render an acquittal or a dismissal,
for judicial bar to the person who has been sentenced,
or make the court render a remission of punishment
for the person to whom punishment has been rendered
or make the court find a lesser crime than the crime
which was found in the original judgment; or,

(vii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a judge
who participated in the original judgment, a judge who participated
in making documentary evidence which served as evidence in the original judgment,
or the public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer who compiled a document or gave a statement
which served as evidence in the original judgment,
committed a crime with regard to his / her duty in the case; provided,
however, that this shall be limited to when prosecution against such judge ,
public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer was instituted before rendition of the original judgment,
and when the original court did not know such fact.

The following explains the false name of the content.
I have explained many times.
The “reason for crime” in the indictment is the content
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
See “Indictment”.
"Indictment" is the following description.
1) The fact that the “regular offender” violated Article 70 “Unqualified Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The fact that “Defendant” provided “Contract of Employment
with False Contents” to “Criminal”.
3) The fact that the “right offender” filed an application for “residence status”
with the attachment of a “false employment contract”. (There is no description,
but since you have obtained the status of residence, it will be act 1) above.
“Defendant” is the person who “provided a false employment contract” to the “criminal”.

When a “criminal” is attached with a “false employment contract”,
he / she will be listed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Law.
The Minister of Justice performs the following “Administrative Disposition”.
It is not (criminal punishment).
1) Cancel your status of residence.
2) Order to leave the country.
They punished those who were not guilty in Articles 60
and 62 of the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”.

Therefore, the “doing” of the parties concerned falls under Article 172
of the Criminal Code “Crimes of False Complaints”
and Article 194 of the Penal Code “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
If you are guilty, you are eligible for a “request for retrial”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-14: Sehr geehrter Herr, Viele Menschen verstehen diesen Vorfall. Es ist ein Fehler im "anwendbaren Recht". Viele raten "Eine Bitte um Wiederholung". Eine Aufforderung zur erneuten Prüfung Eine Aufforderung zur erneuten Prüfung ist jedoch aufgrund eines Fehlers im geltenden Recht nicht zulässig. Siehe Artikel 435 Absätze 3 und 7 der Strafprozessordnung. Ich verklage also die Person, die in den Fall verwickelt ist. "Sinalität" ist "Verbrechen falscher Beschwerden" und "Missbrauch von Autorität durch einen speziellen Beamten".

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-10-14: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Viele Menschen verstehen diesen Vorfall. Es ist ein Fehler im "anwendbaren Recht". Viele raten "Eine Bitte um Wiederholung". Eine Aufforderung zur erneuten Prüfung Eine Aufforderung zur erneuten Prüfung ist jedoch aufgrund eines Fehlers im geltenden Recht nicht zulässig. Siehe Artikel 435 Absätze 3 und 7 der Strafprozessordnung. Ich verklage also die Person, die in den Fall verwickelt ist. "Sinalität" ist "Verbrechen falscher Beschwerden" und "Missbrauch von Autorität durch einen speziellen Beamten".


Teil 1. Japanisch wird weggelassen. Bitte überprüfen Sie die folgende Website.
Artikel 435 Gegen eine endgültige Entscheidung kann ein Antrag auf Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens gestellt werden
und bindendes Schuldurteil, wenn es im Interesse der Person eingereicht wird
Wer wurde für schuldig befunden und wann:

(i) Es wurde durch ein endgültiges und bindendes Urteil bewiesen, dass Dokumentarfilm
oder materielle Beweise, die im ursprünglichen Urteil als Beweise dienten, sind falsch
oder wurde geändert;

(ii) Es wurde durch ein endgültiges und bindendes Urteil bewiesen, dass Zeugnis,
Gutachten, Dolmetschen oder Übersetzen, die als Beweismittel dienten
im ursprünglichen Urteil war falsch;

(iii) Es wurde durch ein endgültiges und bindendes Urteil bewiesen, dass eine Person
wer für schuldig befunden wurde, wurde fälschlicherweise beschuldigt;
Dies gilt jedoch nur, wenn diese Person für schuldig befunden wurde
auf der Grundlage einer solchen falschen Anschuldigung;
(iv)

(iv) Eine Entscheidung, die im ursprünglichen Urteil als Beweismittel diente, wurde geändert
durch endgültiges und bindendes Urteil;

(v) In Bezug auf Fälle, in denen eine Person einer Straftat für schuldig befunden wurde
eines Patent-, Gebrauchsmuster-, Geschmacksmuster- oder Markenrechts,
eine Gerichtsentscheidung, die dieses Recht aufhebt, ist rechtskräftig geworden,
oder ein Urteil, das dieses Recht aufhebt, ergangen ist;

(vi) eindeutige Beweise, die das Gericht zu einem Freispruch oder einer Entlassung veranlassen sollten,
für die gerichtliche Anwaltskanzlei der Person, die verurteilt wurde,
oder lassen Sie das Gericht einen Strafbefehl erlassen
für die Person, für die die Strafe verhängt wurde
oder das Gericht dazu bringen, ein geringeres Verbrechen zu finden als das gefundene Verbrechen
im ursprünglichen Urteil oder

(vii) Es wurde durch ein endgültiges und bindendes Urteil bewiesen, dass ein Richter
der an dem ursprünglichen Urteil teilgenommen hat, ein Richter, der teilgenommen hat
bei der Erbringung von Nachweisen, die im ursprünglichen Urteil als Beweismittel gedient haben,
oder die Staatsanwaltschaft, der stellvertretende Beamte der Staatsanwaltschaft,
oder ein Polizeibeamter, der ein Dokument erstellt oder eine Erklärung abgegeben hat
die als Beweismittel im ursprünglichen Urteil diente, begangen ein Verbrechen
in Bezug auf seine / ihre Pflicht in dem Fall, sofern,
dass dies jedoch auf die Strafverfolgung gegen einen solchen Richter beschränkt sein soll,
Staatsanwaltschaft, stellvertretender Beamter der Staatsanwaltschaft,
oder richterlicher Polizeibeamter wurde vor Überstellung eingesetzt
des ursprünglichen Urteils, und als das ursprüngliche Gericht solche Tatsache nicht wusste.

Im Folgenden wird der falsche Name des Inhalts erläutert.
Ich habe es oft erklärt.
Der "Grund für die Straftat" in der Anklageschrift ist der Inhalt des Einwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4.
Siehe "Anklage".
"Anklage" ist die folgende Beschreibung.
1) Die Tatsache, dass der "reguläre Täter" gegen Artikel 70 "Unqualified Labour" des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstieß.
2) Die Tatsache, dass "Beklagte" "Arbeitsvertrag mit falschen Inhalten" an "Kriminelle" lieferte.
3) Die Tatsache, dass der „Rechte Täter“ einen Antrag auf „Aufenthaltsstatus“ mit der Anlage eines „falschen Arbeitsvertrags“ gestellt hat.
(Es gibt keine Beschreibung, aber da Sie den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben, ist dies Schritt 1).
"Angeklagter" ist die Person, die dem "Verbrecher" einen "falschen Arbeitsvertrag" zur Verfügung gestellt hat.

Wenn der „Verbrecher“ einen „Arbeitsvertrag mit falschem Inhalt“ anhängt und den Aufenthaltsstatus erhält
Es gibt eine Beschreibung im Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4.
Der Justizminister führt die folgende "administrative Disposition" durch. Es ist nicht (strafrechtliche Bestrafung).
1) Kündigen Sie Ihren Aufenthaltsstatus.
2) Befehl, das Land zu verlassen.
Sie bestraften diejenigen, die sich nicht an den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs „Sünder zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten“ schuldig gemacht hatten.

Daher ist die "Tat" der verbundenen Partei
"Verbrechen falscher Beschwerden" und Artikel 194 des Strafgesetzbuches
Es fällt unter "Amtsmissbrauch durch Sonderbeamte".
Wenn Sie schuldig sind, haben Sie Anspruch auf einen „Antrag auf Wiederholung“.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten andere „illegale Arbeit“ als „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "willkürliche" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für die Straftat“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Anklage den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstütze "Sue" bis "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-10-14: Monsieur, Beaucoup de gens comprennent cet incident. C'est une erreur de "loi applicable". Beaucoup conseillent "une demande de nouveau procès". Cependant, une requête en «nouvelle procédure» n'est pas autorisée en raison d'une erreur dans la «loi applicable». Voir article 435, paragraphes 3 et 7 du code de procédure pénale. Je poursuis donc la personne impliquée dans l'affaire. "Sin name" est "crimes de fausses plaintes" et "abus d'autorité par un fonctionnaire spécial"

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-10-14: Monsieur,
Beaucoup de gens comprennent cet incident. C'est une erreur de "loi applicable". Beaucoup conseillent "une demande de nouveau procès". Cependant, une requête en «nouvelle procédure» n'est pas autorisée en raison d'une erreur dans la «loi applicable». Voir article 435, paragraphes 3 et 7 du code de procédure pénale. Je poursuis donc la personne impliquée dans l'affaire. "Sin name" est "crimes de fausses plaintes" et "abus d'autorité par un fonctionnaire spécial"


Partie 1 Le japonais est omis. S'il vous plaît consulter le site Web suivant.
Article 435 Une requête en révision peut être formée contre une décision finale.
et exécutoire jugement de culpabilité, lorsqu'il est déposé dans l'intérêt de la personne
qui a été reconnu coupable et quand:

(i) Il a été prouvé par un jugement définitif et contraignant que le documentaire
ou une preuve matérielle qui a servi de preuve dans le jugement initial est fausse
ou a été modifié;

(ii) Il a été prouvé par un jugement définitif et contraignant que le témoignage,
expertise, interprétation ou traduction qui a servi de preuve
dans le jugement original était faux;

(iii) Il a été prouvé par un jugement définitif et contraignant qu'une personne
qui a été trouvé coupable a été faussement accusé;
cependant, cela ne sera le cas que lorsque cette personne aura été déclarée coupable
sur la base de cette fausse accusation;
(iv)

iv) Une décision ayant servi de preuve dans le jugement initial a été modifiée
par jugement définitif et contraignant;

v) Dans les cas où une personne a été déclarée coupable d'infraction pénale
d'un droit de brevet, d'un droit de modèle d'utilité, d'un droit de conception ou d'un droit de marque,
une décision de procès annulant un tel droit est devenue définitive,
ou un jugement qui a annulé ce droit a été rendu;

(vi) Des preuves claires qui devraient amener le tribunal à prononcer un acquittement ou un congédiement,
pour l'interdiction judiciaire à la personne qui a été condamnée,
ou faire que le tribunal rende une remise de peine
pour la personne à qui la peine a été infligée
ou faire en sorte que le tribunal trouve un crime moins grave que le crime constaté
dans le jugement initial, ou

(vii) Il a été prouvé par un jugement définitif et contraignant qu’un juge
qui a participé au jugement initial, un juge qui a participé
en produisant une preuve documentaire qui a servi de preuve dans le jugement initial,
ou le procureur, l'officier assistant du procureur,
ou officier de police judiciaire qui a compilé un document ou fait une déclaration
qui a servi de preuve dans le jugement initial, a commis un crime
en ce qui concerne son devoir dans l'affaire;
cependant, cela doit être limité au moment où les poursuites contre ce juge,
procureur, assistant du procureur,
ou officier de police judiciaire a été institué avant la restitution
du jugement initial, et lorsque le tribunal d'origine n'a pas su un tel fait.

Ce qui suit explique le faux nom du contenu.
J'ai expliqué plusieurs fois.
Le «motif du crime» dans l'acte d'accusation est le contenu de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Voir «Acte d'accusation».
"Acte d'accusation" est la description suivante.
1) Le fait que le «délinquant régulier» a violé l’article 70 «Travail non qualifié» de la Loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
2) Le fait que le "défendeur" ait fourni le "contrat de travail avec faux contenu" à "criminel".
3) Le fait que le «contrevenant de droit» ait déposé une demande de «statut de résident» avec la saisie d'un «faux contrat de travail».
(Il n'y a pas de description, mais puisque vous avez obtenu le statut de résidence, ce sera l'acte 1) ci-dessus.
Le «défendeur» est la personne qui a «fourni un faux contrat de travail» au «criminel».

Lorsque le "criminel" joint un "contrat de travail avec un contenu faux" et obtient le statut de résident
L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration contient une description.
Le ministre de la Justice exécute la «décision administrative» suivante. Ce n'est pas (punition pénale).
1) Annulez votre statut de résidence.
2) Ordre de quitter le pays.
Ils punissaient ceux qui n'étaient pas coupables aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal «Les pécheurs pour soutenir d'autres crimes».

Par conséquent, l’acte de la partie liée est
"Crimes de fausses plaintes" et article 194 du code pénal
Cela relève de «l'abus de pouvoir d'un fonctionnaire spécial».
Si vous êtes coupable, vous êtes admissible à une «demande de nouveau procès».

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "le soutien de l'article 22-4-4 du droit de l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration indiqué dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-14: Dear Sir, Japanese is omitted. Please check the following website. Article 435 A request for a retrial may be filed against a final and binding judgment of guilt, when filed in the interests of the person who has been found guilty, and when:

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-14: Dear Sir,
Many people understand this incident. It is an error in "applicable law". Many advise “A request for retrial”. However, a request for “retrial A request for retrial” is not allowed because of an error in the “applicable law”. See Article 435, Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code. So I am suing the person involved in the case. "Sin name" is "Crimes of False Complaints" and "abuse of authority by special public officer"


Part 1. Japanese is omitted. Please check the following website.
Article 435 A request for a retrial may be filed against a final and binding judgment of guilt,
when filed in the interests of the person who has been found guilty, and when:

(i) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that documentary
or material evidence which served as evidence
in the original judgment is false or has been altered;

(ii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that testimony,
expert evaluation, interpretation, or translation which served as evidence
in the original judgment was false;

(iii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a person
who has been found guilty was falsely accused; provided, however, that this shall only be when such person was found guilty on the basis of such false accusation;
(iv)

(iv) A decision which served as evidence in the original judgment has been altered
by final and binding judgment;

(v) With regard to cases where a person has been found guilty
of criminal infringement of a patent right, utility model right, design right,
or trademark right, a trial decision that voided such right has become final,
or a judgment that voided such right has been rendered;

(vi) Clear evidence which should make the court render an acquittal or a dismissal,
for judicial bar to the person who has been sentenced,
or make the court render a remission of punishment
for the person to whom punishment has been rendered
or make the court find a lesser crime than the crime
which was found in the original judgment; or,

(vii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a judge
who participated in the original judgment, a judge who participated
in making documentary evidence which served as evidence in the original judgment,
or the public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer who compiled a document or gave a statement
which served as evidence in the original judgment,
committed a crime with regard to his / her duty in the case; provided,
however, that this shall be limited to when prosecution against such judge ,
public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer was instituted before rendition of the original judgment,
and when the original court did not know such fact.

The following explains the false name of the content.
I have explained many times.
The “reason for crime” in the indictment is the content
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
See “Indictment”.
"Indictment" is the following description.
1) The fact that the “regular offender” violated Article 70 “Unqualified Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The fact that “Defendant” provided “Contract of Employment
with False Contents” to “Criminal”.
3) The fact that the “right offender” filed an application for “residence status”
with the attachment of a “false employment contract”. (There is no description,
but since you have obtained the status of residence, it will be act 1) above.
“Defendant” is the person who “provided a false employment contract” to the “criminal”.

When a “criminal” is attached with a “false employment contract”,
he / she will be listed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Law.
The Minister of Justice performs the following “Administrative Disposition”.
It is not (criminal punishment).
1) Cancel your status of residence.
2) Order to leave the country.
They punished those who were not guilty in Articles 60
and 62 of the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”.

Therefore, the “doing” of the parties concerned falls under Article 172
of the Criminal Code “Crimes of False Complaints”
and Article 194 of the Penal Code “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
If you are guilty, you are eligible for a “request for retrial”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."

To everyone in the world's media 2019-10-14: Dear Sir, Many people understand this incident. It is an error in "applicable law". Many advise “A request for retrial”. However, a request for “retrial A request for retrial” is not allowed because of an error in the “applicable law”. See Article 435, Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code. So I am suing the person involved in the case. "Sin name" is "Crimes of False Complaints" and "abuse of authority by special public officer"

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-14: Dear Sir,
Many people understand this incident. It is an error in "applicable law". Many advise “A request for retrial”. However, a request for “retrial A request for retrial” is not allowed because of an error in the “applicable law”. See Article 435, Paragraphs 3 and 7 of the Criminal Procedure Code. So I am suing the person involved in the case. "Sin name" is "Crimes of False Complaints" and "abuse of authority by special public officer"


Part 1. Japanese is omitted. Please check the following website.
Article 435 A request for a retrial may be filed against a final and binding judgment of guilt,
when filed in the interests of the person who has been found guilty, and when:

(i) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that documentary
or material evidence which served as evidence
in the original judgment is false or has been altered;

(ii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that testimony,
expert evaluation, interpretation, or translation which served as evidence
in the original judgment was false;

(iii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a person
who has been found guilty was falsely accused; provided, however, that this shall only be when such person was found guilty on the basis of such false accusation;
(iv)

(iv) A decision which served as evidence in the original judgment has been altered
by final and binding judgment;

(v) With regard to cases where a person has been found guilty
of criminal infringement of a patent right, utility model right, design right,
or trademark right, a trial decision that voided such right has become final,
or a judgment that voided such right has been rendered;

(vi) Clear evidence which should make the court render an acquittal or a dismissal,
for judicial bar to the person who has been sentenced,
or make the court render a remission of punishment
for the person to whom punishment has been rendered
or make the court find a lesser crime than the crime
which was found in the original judgment; or,

(vii) It has been proven through a final and binding judgment that a judge
who participated in the original judgment, a judge who participated
in making documentary evidence which served as evidence in the original judgment,
or the public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer who compiled a document or gave a statement
which served as evidence in the original judgment,
committed a crime with regard to his / her duty in the case; provided,
however, that this shall be limited to when prosecution against such judge ,
public prosecutor, public prosecutor's assistant officer,
or judicial police officer was instituted before rendition of the original judgment,
and when the original court did not know such fact.

The following explains the false name of the content.
I have explained many times.
The “reason for crime” in the indictment is the content
of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
See “Indictment”.
"Indictment" is the following description.
1) The fact that the “regular offender” violated Article 70 “Unqualified Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The fact that “Defendant” provided “Contract of Employment
with False Contents” to “Criminal”.
3) The fact that the “right offender” filed an application for “residence status”
with the attachment of a “false employment contract”. (There is no description,
but since you have obtained the status of residence, it will be act 1) above.
“Defendant” is the person who “provided a false employment contract” to the “criminal”.

When a “criminal” is attached with a “false employment contract”,
he / she will be listed in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Law.
The Minister of Justice performs the following “Administrative Disposition”.
It is not (criminal punishment).
1) Cancel your status of residence.
2) Order to leave the country.
They punished those who were not guilty in Articles 60
and 62 of the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes”.

Therefore, the “doing” of the parties concerned falls under Article 172
of the Criminal Code “Crimes of False Complaints”
and Article 194 of the Penal Code “abuse of authority by special public officer”.
If you are guilty, you are eligible for a “request for retrial”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Law (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Proposal from Japanese October 12, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “min Shin nakuba tatazu” is an important word. Dear Sir, After the meeting, the six European countries including Britain, France and Germany issued a joint statement blaming North Korea's (SLBM) launch, saying that “it was a violation of the Security Council resolution that undermined regional security and stability”. The Trump administration once again turned away from the international community. Europe will no longer defend President Trump on suspicion of Ukraine. Americans should cooperate with the international community. Gambare!

Proposal from Japanese

October 12, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “min Shin nakuba tatazu” is an important word.

Dear Sir,

After the meeting, the six European countries including Britain, France and Germany issued a joint statement blaming North Korea's (SLBM) launch, saying that “it was a violation of the Security Council resolution that undermined regional security and stability”. The Trump administration once again turned away from the international community. Europe will no longer defend President Trump on suspicion of Ukraine. Americans should cooperate with the international community. Gambare!

Part 1. The statement of intention as the Security Council was postponed. North Korean Ambassador Kimson met with some media such as Reuters on the 7th, and if the Security Council took up the issue of ballistic missile launch, “it will drive our self-defense consciousness further,” He said "prevent free action".

North Korea expressed its view that it would well understand that the United States is behind the impure movement when it held the talks on the 8th.

I think the Trump administration succumbed to North Korea's pressure.

I think Trump will be the “tactics” he chose for next year's presidential election.

Recently, the Americans seem to have made a judgment different from that of President Trump.

There is a saying “min Shin nakuba tatazu” in Chinese sayings.

Below is an English translation of “min Shin nakuba tatazu”.

Without the trust of the people, there can be no government.

It is a conversation in “The Analects of Confucius”.

“Sikou” of disciple asks “Confucius” about “politics”.

“Confucius” replied, “Provide enough food, good armament, and trust people.”

(The true meaning of this explanation is significant). There is a longer commentary.

I think North Korea's “Chairman Kim Jong-Un” also knows.

I don't think that he understands this meaning and is politics.

I don't think President Trump knows this.

There are many researchers in the United States who are studying "theories".

It is important to know what this means if President Trump wants to be “re-elected”.

The important thing is to understand and execute.

It's great to understand all of the "language" if you have time.

President Trump should understand “min Shin nakuba tatazu”.

And if you do politics, you can get along with the international community.

All Americans will respect President Trump,

And will follow the president.

Will continue tomorrow

Part 2. In the United States, I “suggest” to build a “special zone” along the border with Mexico.

See April 13, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition.

Japan's immigration policy is worse than the United States.

Japanese immigration law is similar to American immigration law.

America's prosperity is realized by the world being free, democratic, and "ruled under the law".

I seriously seek the rule of law. Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

There are many American victims.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.j