To President Trump
2019-10-25: Dear Sir,
Japan accepts a lot of foreigners. However, when the labor force is full,
it is forced to become a “criminal” and “exiled”. This is true.
This is called “human rights violations”.
It's more terrible than the Chinese government's “human rights violations” against Uyghurs.
Part 1. This is a continuation of yesterday's scary story.
The part “Filipinos have been able to stay
in Japan because they have obtained status of residence” is also a crime
in the following scenario.
1) The owner of the apartment lent “1 room” to a foreigner.
2) Foreigners could stay in Japan because they could rent a room in the apartment.
3) Foreigners were able to stay there, so they were able to murder.
All crimes involving "foreigners were able to stay
in Japan" can be turned into "crimes to support other crimes"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
In fact, during a police investigation, a police officer
from the Metropolitan Police Department told me,
President (I am)!
It is not “big sin” because foreigners have done “illegal labor”.
However, if a foreigner "murders", it will be a "guilty of support" for "murder"!
In Japan, as a matter of fact,
“a person who has supported foreigners staying
in Japan” is already a “helper” such as “murder”.
The media does not "report" information that is detrimental to the police and prosecutors.
Parliamentarians made a “big controversy”
in the National Assembly where “conspiracy” was discussed.
But parliamentarians allow “illegal views” in this “sin that supports other crimes”.
To date, this is true.
There are no legislators who say it is illegal.
Japan accepts a lot of foreigners.
If you no longer need it, you will be exiled as a “criminal”.
This case is clearly a “make-up” crime because “Law of Law”
gives priority to Article 22-4-4 “Revocation of Status of Residence”.
If I don't have the provision of “cancellation of status of residence”
in Article 22-4-4 in the Immigration Control Law,
I think “I'm afraid” when I wonder if there is such an “illegal argument”.
Japan must be made “a country that governs under the law” as soon as possible.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
2019-10-25: Dear Sir,
Japan accepts a lot of foreigners. However, when the labor force is full,
it is forced to become a “criminal” and “exiled”. This is true.
This is called “human rights violations”.
It's more terrible than the Chinese government's “human rights violations” against Uyghurs.
Part 1. This is a continuation of yesterday's scary story.
The part “Filipinos have been able to stay
in Japan because they have obtained status of residence” is also a crime
in the following scenario.
1) The owner of the apartment lent “1 room” to a foreigner.
2) Foreigners could stay in Japan because they could rent a room in the apartment.
3) Foreigners were able to stay there, so they were able to murder.
All crimes involving "foreigners were able to stay
in Japan" can be turned into "crimes to support other crimes"
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
In fact, during a police investigation, a police officer
from the Metropolitan Police Department told me,
President (I am)!
It is not “big sin” because foreigners have done “illegal labor”.
However, if a foreigner "murders", it will be a "guilty of support" for "murder"!
In Japan, as a matter of fact,
“a person who has supported foreigners staying
in Japan” is already a “helper” such as “murder”.
The media does not "report" information that is detrimental to the police and prosecutors.
Parliamentarians made a “big controversy”
in the National Assembly where “conspiracy” was discussed.
But parliamentarians allow “illegal views” in this “sin that supports other crimes”.
To date, this is true.
There are no legislators who say it is illegal.
Japan accepts a lot of foreigners.
If you no longer need it, you will be exiled as a “criminal”.
This case is clearly a “make-up” crime because “Law of Law”
gives priority to Article 22-4-4 “Revocation of Status of Residence”.
If I don't have the provision of “cancellation of status of residence”
in Article 22-4-4 in the Immigration Control Law,
I think “I'm afraid” when I wonder if there is such an “illegal argument”.
Japan must be made “a country that governs under the law” as soon as possible.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
