Opinion from Japanese Saturday version, November 02, 2019: Dear Sir, On December 29, the British Parliament House of Representatives passed the "Bill to carry out the general election ahead of schedule" in December. For Prime Minister Johnson, it was a “progress” toward “breaking” the “stuck” over (Brexit) from (EU). congratulations.

Opinion from Japanese

Saturday version, November 02, 2019: Dear Sir,
On December 29, the British Parliament House of Representatives passed the "Bill to carry out the general election ahead of schedule" in December.
For Prime Minister Johnson, it was a “progress” toward “breaking” the “stuck” over (Brexit) from (EU). congratulations.


Part 1. According to Reuters,
the House rejected a motion on the December 12 general election proposed
by Prime Minister Johnson the day before. On this day,
the Labor Party turned around to support the general election ahead of schedule.
Since it was judged that there was overwhelming support at the "second reading party",
it was approved without voting.
Subsequent voting was approved with 438 votes in favor and 20 votes against,
and sent to the Senate.
In the general election, the “selection” of “voters” is asked.
It is the choice between Prime Minister Johnson,
who aims to realize his own withdrawal agreement, and Corbin,
the leader of the largest opposition and labor party,
who appeals to renegotiate with the EU for a new referendum.

Johnson is to win the general election.
Prime Minister Johnson should talk about the concept of the “British Commonwealth”
in the general election.
British people dream of a revival of the British Empire.
Britain cannot be revived as a “British Empire”.
However, the British people are expecting that the UK will be the center
and that the British Commonwealth will become a group with great economic power like the EU.

The UK should never again vote for a “voting for withdrawal from the EU”.
The UK should realize the “withdrawal from the EU” that was “chosen by the British” last time.
In this way, Britain can become a true democracy.
Prime Minister Johnson! Ganbare!
God, give happiness to the UK!
God, give happiness to the Commonwealth!

Continued on “November 13, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition”.

Part 2. Many foreigners have been arrested for violating immigration law
in violation of international law.
(I can't count).
Korean, Chinese, Filippin, American, `` Everyone '' from all over the world!
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!

Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.
They were arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
Received "criminal disposition" such as "fine penalty".
And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.

A third party has been arrested on charges of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor"
of foreigners.
The victim is me and “Kin Gungaku who is Chinese”.
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.

The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
Therefore, as a crime against foreigner immigration law Article 70 "illegal labor"
"Crime that supported other crimes" in "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code" applies.

Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor” is “sin of support”
It is stipulated in “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.

The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.

Even if you get a status of residence with "false documents",
If you work within the scope of your status of residence, it is not “illegal labor”.
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in the “Applicable Law”.
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".

If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate, so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yashiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/POTD-July-10-1200x800.jpg

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Help me! 致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。 2019-11-01：亲爱的先生， 朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。 朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。 朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。 朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。 朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。批准

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-11-01：亲爱的先生，
出狱后，我对与本案有关的警官，检察官，法官等提出了“起诉”，要求“重审”。检察官说，“犯罪事实”在本文件中是“未知的”。请在网站上判断事实。贵国情况如何？疯了这是日本！


第一部分请在网上检查检方与我之间的“文件交换记录”。
根据法律，也可以通过“口头，假释”进行“起诉和指控”。
我想做“刑事指控”
创建了“费用”或“费用”，并以“文档”形式提交。
即使您多次更正后提交，答案也是相同的。
我研究并准备了“虚假指控”和“特殊公务员虐待指控”的“犯罪构成要求”。
最终文件可在网上找到。

如果“犯罪构成要求”未知，则应提供“建议”，而“文件准备”应得到“支持”。
起诉的目的是“粉碎”。

当东京检察官的“检察官检察官”（首席检察官长）发生变化时，我满怀期待地提交了最后一份文件。
但是，没有回复。
“虚假指控”和“特殊公务员虐待指控”的“法定时效”为7年。
因此，“极限老化统计”结束了。
但是，他们拒绝接受“投诉信”和“起诉书”。
我不知道这种情况下的“情况”。
在这种情况下，我就像罪魁祸首逃到国外一样
我认为“限制年龄的统计”已“停止”。
“投诉信”
收到“起诉书”的部门以“锻炼”方式拒绝接受
保留提交截止日期是“不可抗力”。
他们有一个“投诉信”来“保护”他们的“同志”
“起诉书”的“拒绝”，“收到”。
首先，特殊公务员犯下“虚假指控”或“特殊公务员虐待”罪行是“无政府状态”。

此外，在屡犯后，我们将拒绝接受“起诉书”和“指责指控”。
如果我诉诸立法者或政党，我将无视这一点。
日本完全是“无政府状态”。
这件事是世界大事。
在世界上，“移民”和“难民”已成为主要问题。
在世界上，“人权”是一个大问题。
日本是应领导人权的发达国家。
日本是世界上第四大移民国。
日本的现状不能通过“不干涉内政”来解决。
各国政府和国际媒体，大家！
请让日本成为正确的国家。

继续下周。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
自事件发生至今已近10年。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持，以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。

但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我，金国阁，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《针对移民法的刑法典》第70条和第70条第70条
“申请”是“疯狂”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。
材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广


PS：白宫回答我，我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果
我希望没有谎言。



请询问最高领导人金正恩（*）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。批准


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To President Trump 2019-11-01: Dear Sir, Please check the “document exchange record” between the prosecution and me on the web.

To President Trump


2019-11-01: Dear Sir,
After leaving prison, I "sue" police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc. related to the case for a "request for retrial". Prosecutors say "crime fact" is "unknown" in this document. Please judge the facts on the website. How is it in your country? Crazy. This is Japan!


Part 1. Please check the “document exchange record” between the prosecution and me on the web.
According to the law, “sue and accusation” is also possible by “oral, by parol”.
I created a “Claim” and “Clause” and submitted it in “Document”
in order to accurately carry out “Criminal accusation”.
Even if you submit it after correcting it many times, it is the same answer.
I researched and prepared the “criminal composition requirements” of “false charges”
and “special civil servant abuse charges”.
The final documents are available on the web.

If “criminal composition requirements” are unknown,
“advice” should be given and “document preparation” should be “supported”.
The intention of the prosecution was to “crush”.

When the Tokyo Prosecutor's “Prosecutor Prosecutor” (Chief Prosecutor Chief) changed,
I submitted the last document with anticipation.
However, there was no reply.
The “statutory of limitation” for “false charges”
and “special civil servant abuse charges” is 7 years.
Therefore, the “aging statistics of limitation” is over.
However, they refuse to receive “letter of complaint” and “bill of indictment”.
I don't know the “case” in this case.
In this case, I think that the “statistic of limitation” is “stopped” just as
if the criminal had fled abroad.
If the department that receives the “letter of complaint”
or “bill of indictment” refuses to receive it by “authority”,
it is “force majeure” to keep the deadline for submission.
They “rejected” the “receipt” of “letter of complaint”
and “bill of indictment” to “protect” their “mates”.
In the first place, it is “anarchy” when a special civil servant commits a crime
of “false charges” or “special civil servant abuse”.

In addition, we will refuse to receive “indictments”
and “accusal accusations” after repeated crimes.
I will ignore this if I appeal to legislators or political parties who have legislated.
Japan is completely “anarchic”.
This incident is the world's big deal.
In the world, "immigrants" and "refugees" have become major problems.
In the world, "human rights" is a big problem.
Japan is a developed country that should lead human rights.
Japan is the fourth most immigrant country in the world.
The current situation in Japan cannot be solved by “no interference with domestic affairs”.
Governments and international media, everyone!
Please make Japan the right country.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.



My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-11-01: Monsieur,Les procureurs disent que "le fait criminel" est "inconnu" dans ce document. S'il vous plaît juger les faits sur le site. Comment ça se passe dans votre pays? Fou. C'est le Japon!

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-11-01: Monsieur,
Après ma sortie de prison, j'ai intenté une «poursuite» en justice contre des officiers de police, des procureurs, des juges, etc., en vue d'une «demande de nouveau procès». Les procureurs disent que "le fait criminel" est "inconnu" dans ce document. S'il vous plaît juger les faits sur le site. Comment ça se passe dans votre pays? Fou. C'est le Japon!


Partie 1 Veuillez vérifier le «dossier d’échange de documents» entre l’accusation et moi sur le Web.
Selon la loi, «poursuivre et accuser» est également possible par «oral, par parol».
Je voudrais faire "accusation criminelle"
Créer une “charge” ou une “charge” et la soumettre dans un “document”.
Même si vous le soumettez après l'avoir corrigé plusieurs fois, c'est la même réponse.
J'ai effectué des recherches et créé les «exigences pénales» pour les «fausses accusations» et les «crimes spéciaux commis à l'encontre des fonctionnaires».
Les documents finaux sont disponibles sur le web.

Si les «exigences de composition criminelle» ne sont pas connues, il convient de donner un «conseil» et de «soutenir la préparation» des documents.
L'intention de l'accusation était d '«écraser».

Lorsque le «procureur du procureur» de Tokyo a changé, j'ai soumis le dernier document avec de grandes attentes.
Cependant, il n'y avait pas de réponse.
Le «délai de prescription» pour les «fausses accusations» et les «accusations spéciales d’abus commis par un fonctionnaire» est de 7 ans.
Par conséquent, les «statistiques de limitation du vieillissement» sont terminées.
Cependant, il refuse de recevoir une «lettre de plainte» et un «acte d'accusation».
Je ne connais pas le «cas» dans ce cas.
Je suis dans ce cas comme si le coupable s'était enfui à l'étranger
Je pense que les "statistiques de limitation de l'âge" sont "stoppées".
«Lettre de plainte»
Le département qui reçoit l'acte d'accusation a refusé de le recevoir par «exercice»
Respecter la date limite de soumission est "force majeure".
Ils ont une "lettre de plainte" pour "protéger" leurs "camarades"
«Rejeté» «Reçu» de «Acte d'accusation».
En premier lieu, on parle d’anarchie lorsqu’un fonctionnaire spécial commet un crime de «fausses accusations» ou de «sévices spéciaux à l’égard de fonctionnaires».

En outre, nous refuserons de recevoir des "actes d’accusation" et des "accusations" après des crimes répétés.
J'ignorerai cela si je fais appel aux législateurs ou aux partis politiques qui ont légiféré.
Le Japon est complètement "anarchique".
Cet incident est la grosse affaire du monde.
Dans le monde, les "immigrants" et les "réfugiés" sont devenus des problèmes majeurs.
Dans le monde, les "droits de l'homme" constituent un gros problème.
Le Japon est un pays développé qui devrait être en tête des droits de l'homme.
Le Japon est le quatrième pays le plus immigré au monde.
La situation actuelle au Japon ne peut être résolue par «aucune ingérence dans les affaires intérieures».
Gouvernements et médias internationaux, tout le monde!
S'il vous plaît, faites du Japon le bon pays.

Continuez jusqu'à la semaine prochaine.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "soutien de l'article 22-4-4 loi sur l'immigration"
Articles 70 et 62 du Code pénal contre la loi sur l'immigration 70
"Appliquer" est "fou".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Cependant, "écraser" par le pouvoir de l’État signifie "arrêter" de "délai de prescription".
Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat
Je ne m'attends pas à des mensonges.


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-11-01: Sehr geehrter Herr, Nach dem Verlassen des Gefängnisses "verklage" ich Polizeibeamte, Staatsanwälte, Richter usw. im Zusammenhang mit dem Fall wegen eines "Antrags auf Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens".

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-11-01: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Nach dem Verlassen des Gefängnisses "verklage" ich Polizeibeamte, Staatsanwälte, Richter usw. im Zusammenhang mit dem Fall wegen eines "Antrags auf Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens". Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagt, dass "Tatbestand" in diesem Dokument "unbekannt" ist. Bitte beurteilen Sie die Fakten auf der Website. Wie ist es in deinem Land? Verrückt. Das ist Japan !!


Teil 1. Bitte überprüfen Sie den „Dokumentenaustauschbericht“ zwischen der Staatsanwaltschaft und mir im Internet.
Nach dem Gesetz ist "Klage und Anklage" auch durch "mündliche Verhandlung" möglich.
Ich würde gerne "kriminelle Anklage" erheben
Erstellt eine "Gebühr" oder "Gebühr" und übermittelt es in "Dokument".
Auch wenn Sie es nach mehrmaliger Korrektur einreichen, ist es die gleiche Antwort.
Ich recherchierte und schuf die "strafrechtlichen Anforderungen" für "falsche Anschuldigungen" und "Missbrauchsverbrechen durch Sonderbeamte".
Die endgültigen Dokumente sind im Internet verfügbar.

Wenn "strafrechtliche Anforderungen an die Zusammensetzung" nicht bekannt sind, sollten "Ratschläge" gegeben und "Dokumentenvorbereitung" "unterstützt" werden.
Die Absicht der Anklage war es, "zu zermalmen".

Als sich der „Staatsanwalt“ des Staatsanwalts von Tokio (Chief Prosecutor Chief) änderte, reichte ich das letzte Dokument mit Vorfreude ein.
Es kam jedoch keine Antwort.
Die „Verjährungsfrist“ für „Falschanzeigen“ und „Missbrauchsanzeigen für Sonderbeamte“ beträgt 7 Jahre.
Daher ist die „Altersstatistik der Begrenzung“ vorbei.
Es lehnt jedoch den Erhalt von "Beschwerdebrief" und "Anklageschrift" ab.
Ich kenne den "Fall" in diesem Fall nicht.
Ich bin in diesem Fall so, als wäre der Täter ins Ausland geflohen
Ich denke, dass die "Altersstatistik der Begrenzung" "gestoppt" ist.
"Beschwerdebrief"
Die Abteilung, die die "Anklageschrift" erhält, lehnte es ab, sie durch "Ausübung" zu erhalten
Das Einhalten der Einreichungsfrist ist "höhere Gewalt".
Sie haben ein "Beschwerdebrief", um ihre "Kameraden" "zu schützen"
"Abgelehnt" "Erhalten" der "Anklageschrift".
Erstens ist es „Anarchie“, wenn ein Sonderbeamter ein Verbrechen der „falschen Anschuldigungen“ oder des „Missbrauchs von Sonderbeamten“ begeht.

Darüber hinaus werden wir es ablehnen, nach wiederholten Verbrechen „Anklagen“ und „Vorwürfe“ zu erhalten.
Ich werde dies ignorieren, wenn ich mich an Gesetzgeber oder Parteien wende, die Gesetze erlassen haben.
Japan ist völlig "anarchisch".
Dieser Vorfall ist die große Sache der Welt.
In der Welt sind "Einwanderer" und "Flüchtlinge" zu großen Problemen geworden.
In der Welt sind "Menschenrechte" ein großes Problem.
Japan ist ein Industrieland, das die Menschenrechte führen sollte.
Japan ist das viertwichtigste Einwanderungsland der Welt.
Die gegenwärtige Situation in Japan kann nicht durch „keine Einmischung in die inneren Angelegenheiten“ gelöst werden.
Regierungen und internationale Medien, alle!
Bitte machen Sie Japan zum richtigen Land.

Weiter zur nächsten Woche.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten andere „illegale Arbeit“ als „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es "willkürlich" verbietet, nur Ausländer "zu bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 70 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz 70
"Bewerben" ist "verrückt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.
Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis
Ich erwarte keine Lügen.



Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Die Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Sue" zu "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-01: Dear Sir, Prosecutors say "crime fact" is "unknown" in this document. Please judge the facts on the website. How is it in your country? Crazy. This is Japan!

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-11-01: Dear Sir,
After leaving prison, I "sue" police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc. related to the case for a "request for retrial". Prosecutors say "crime fact" is "unknown" in this document. Please judge the facts on the website. How is it in your country? Crazy. This is Japan!


Part 1. Please check the “document exchange record” between the prosecution and me on the web.
According to the law, “sue and accusation” is also possible by “oral, by parol”.
I created a “Claim” and “Clause” and submitted it in “Document”
in order to accurately carry out “Criminal accusation”.
Even if you submit it after correcting it many times, it is the same answer.
I researched and prepared the “criminal composition requirements” of “false charges”
and “special civil servant abuse charges”.
The final documents are available on the web.

If “criminal composition requirements” are unknown,
“advice” should be given and “document preparation” should be “supported”.
The intention of the prosecution was to “crush”.

When the Tokyo Prosecutor's “Prosecutor Prosecutor” (Chief Prosecutor Chief) changed,
I submitted the last document with anticipation.
However, there was no reply.
The “statutory of limitation” for “false charges”
and “special civil servant abuse charges” is 7 years.
Therefore, the “aging statistics of limitation” is over.
However, they refuse to receive “letter of complaint” and “bill of indictment”.
I don't know the “case” in this case.
In this case, I think that the “statistic of limitation” is “stopped” just as
if the criminal had fled abroad.
If the department that receives the “letter of complaint”
or “bill of indictment” refuses to receive it by “authority”,
it is “force majeure” to keep the deadline for submission.
They “rejected” the “receipt” of “letter of complaint”
and “bill of indictment” to “protect” their “mates”.
In the first place, it is “anarchy” when a special civil servant commits a crime
of “false charges” or “special civil servant abuse”.

In addition, we will refuse to receive “indictments”
and “accusal accusations” after repeated crimes.
I will ignore this if I appeal to legislators or political parties who have legislated.
Japan is completely “anarchic”.
This incident is the world's big deal.
In the world, "immigrants" and "refugees" have become major problems.
In the world, "human rights" is a big problem.
Japan is a developed country that should lead human rights.
Japan is the fourth most immigrant country in the world.
The current situation in Japan cannot be solved by “no interference with domestic affairs”.
Governments and international media, everyone!
Please make Japan the right country.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To everyone in the world's media After leaving prison, I "sue" police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc. related to the case for a "request for retrial".

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-11-01: Dear Sir,
After leaving prison, I "sue" police officers, prosecutors, judges, etc. related to the case for a "request for retrial". Prosecutors say "crime fact" is "unknown" in this document. Please judge the facts on the website. How is it in your country? Crazy. This is Japan!


Part 1. Please check the “document exchange record” between the prosecution and me on the web.
According to the law, “sue and accusation” is also possible by “oral, by parol”.
I created a “Claim” and “Clause” and submitted it in “Document”
in order to accurately carry out “Criminal accusation”.
Even if you submit it after correcting it many times, it is the same answer.
I researched and prepared the “criminal composition requirements” of “false charges”
and “special civil servant abuse charges”.
The final documents are available on the web.

If “criminal composition requirements” are unknown,
“advice” should be given and “document preparation” should be “supported”.
The intention of the prosecution was to “crush”.

When the Tokyo Prosecutor's “Prosecutor Prosecutor” (Chief Prosecutor Chief) changed,
I submitted the last document with anticipation.
However, there was no reply.
The “statutory of limitation” for “false charges”
and “special civil servant abuse charges” is 7 years.
Therefore, the “aging statistics of limitation” is over.
However, they refuse to receive “letter of complaint” and “bill of indictment”.
I don't know the “case” in this case.
In this case, I think that the “statistic of limitation” is “stopped” just as
if the criminal had fled abroad.
If the department that receives the “letter of complaint”
or “bill of indictment” refuses to receive it by “authority”,
it is “force majeure” to keep the deadline for submission.
They “rejected” the “receipt” of “letter of complaint”
and “bill of indictment” to “protect” their “mates”.
In the first place, it is “anarchy” when a special civil servant commits a crime
of “false charges” or “special civil servant abuse”.

In addition, we will refuse to receive “indictments”
and “accusal accusations” after repeated crimes.
I will ignore this if I appeal to legislators or political parties who have legislated.
Japan is completely “anarchic”.
This incident is the world's big deal.
In the world, "immigrants" and "refugees" have become major problems.
In the world, "human rights" is a big problem.
Japan is a developed country that should lead human rights.
Japan is the fourth most immigrant country in the world.
The current situation in Japan cannot be solved by “no interference with domestic affairs”.
Governments and international media, everyone!
Please make Japan the right country.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.



Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! 最高领导人金正恩。 2019-10-31：尊敬的先生， 日本法律是“成文法，成文法”。但是，“判例法”也被认为是重要的。在某些情况下，“法律”适用不当。在实际审判中推翻“案件”需要花费时间。但是，

致朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩。


2019-10-31：尊敬的先生，
日本法律是“成文法，成文法”。但是，“判例法”也被认为是重要的。在某些情况下，“法律”适用不当。在实际审判中推翻“案件”需要花费时间。但是，即使是最高法院的案件也可能被推翻。 2010年违反移民法的案件是违反适用法律的案件。但是，检方使用此“案”在2014年菲律宾大使馆案中犯下同样的罪行。


第一部分我于2010年6月被捕。我因为不认罪而再次被捕。
为了寻求“依法治国”，我保持正义。结果是“被起诉”。
该审判于2010年10月开始。
原因是被认为是“帮凶”的中国“金刚阁”必须在10月底之前送回中国。
我认为这项秘密保证是考虑到移民法的判刑而制定的。
在起诉书中，他说有必要在10月底与中国达成协议“遣返”。
我第一次了解到，《移民违法法》对“拘留期”有“安排”。
我和“ Kin Gungaku”对犯罪负责，因为他们向四名中国人提供了“虚假雇佣合同”。
犯罪的原因是根据《移民管制法》第22-4-4条“支持”犯罪的“行动”。

另一方面，许多律师，议员和有关人员“无可奉告”。
但是外国政府官员和监狱官员明确表示这违反了适用法律。
外国政府比日本人更了解日本法律和国际法。

在网上写的“政党官员”说，有可能遵循“有先例”。

但是，我认为这是2010年6月发生的第一例“违反移民法”。
1）“犯人入狱”适用于违反《移民控制法》第70条的外国人。
2）将《移民管制法》第22-4-4条中的“支持者”适用于《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他犯罪的罪行”。

该罪行的原因是“支持”《移民控制法》第22-4-4条规定的犯罪。
具体地，这是向犯罪者“提供”“虚假文件=雇佣合同”的行为。
此行为用于“调查事实的权利”。

过去，司法部长从未与检方在“调查事实的权利”方面发生冲突。
司法部长们不能宽恕针对外国人的“侵犯人权行为”。
因此，检方有意识地将外国人入狱，而不是传统的“罚款”。
此外，“适用法律”被伪造为中国的“惩罚”。
使用《移民法》第22-4-4条，这是移民部长的酌处权，
适用“协助其他犯罪的罪过”。

我离开监狱后发现的是违反了菲律宾大使馆的《移民法》。
在此审判过程中，2011年的“我们的判例法”更改为“判例法”。
当然，这个“非法判例法实例”必须被“销毁”。
我认为，除了菲律宾大使馆外，还有许多“非法判例法”案件。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
这是日本政府的“国际”“侵犯人权”行为。
自事件发生至今已近10年。我的生命有限。
我们要求您的支持，以便我们进行“荣誉追偿和赔偿”。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。但是疯了。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。

但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了法律上的平等原则。
而且它违反了禁止“任意”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。

如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。
如果是这样，就不会有违反《移民控制法》第70条的“支持《刑法》其他罪行的人”。
“我，金国阁，菲律宾外交官，菲律宾大使馆官员”是清白的。

2。起诉是因为“对移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《刑法》第60条和第62条与《移民管制法》第70条相对
“申请”“支持其他罪行的罪”是“疯狂的”。
这在法律上是不合逻辑的。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。
法律的逻辑是完全疯狂的。

日本政府曾“暗恋”“起诉”。
但是，国家权力的“压榨”是“时效规约”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

长野康广

PS：白宫有这个问题。
我回答说，我正在认真考虑一个令人满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。


请询问最高领导人金正恩（*）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


朝鲜政府应“抗议”日本政府。
“日本政府应绑架外国人”应“解决”。
有很多“同一民族”和“南朝鲜”的“受害者”。
代表``朝鲜半岛人民''抗议日本政府！
安倍政府的弱点是“违反移民法”。
证据表明日本不受法律管辖。

请宣传日本政府“移民法”的虚假陈述。
请宣布这些事情，并谴责日本政府参加7月的参议院选举。
安倍晋三政府感到沮丧。
如果安倍政府崩溃，下一届政府将服从朝鲜。

朝鲜应宣布日本政府“非法绑架和拘留”外国人。
朝鲜应该“公布”，“外国受害者”比“日本绑架者”更多。
朝鲜应该使世界媒体成为朝鲜的“朋友”。
朝鲜政府应在外国媒体和联合国中予以公开。
朝鲜政府应具体披露“我的名字”。批准


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To President Trump 2019-10-31: Dear Sir,I was arrested in June 2010. I was arrested again because I did not confess. I kept justice in search of "governance under the law". The result was “indicted”. The trial started in October 2010.

To President Trump


2019-10-31: Dear Sir,
Japanese law is "Sei Grammar, written law". However, "case law" is also regarded as important. There are some cases where “laws” are wrongly applied. It takes time to overthrow the “case” in an actual trial. However, even the Supreme Court case may be overturned. The 2010 Immigration Law violation case is a case of violation of applicable law. However, the prosecution used this “case” to commit the same crime in the 2014 Philippines Embassy case.


Part 1. I was arrested in June 2010.
I was arrested again because I did not confess.
I kept justice in search of "governance under the law". The result was “indicted”.
The trial started in October 2010.
The reason is that the Chinese “Kin Gungaku”,
who was considered “accomplice,” must be sent back to China by the end of October.
I think this secret pledge is set in consideration of the sentencing of immigration law.
From the prosecution, he says that it is necessary to “repatriate”
by the end of October in an agreement with China.
For the first time, I learned that “Immigration Violation Law” had “arrangement”
for “detention period”.
Me and "Kin Gungaku" are responsible for the crime
because they provided a "false employment contract" to four Chinese.
The reason for the crime is the “action” that “supported” the offense
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

On the other hand, many lawyers, parliamentarians and related persons are "no comment".
But foreign government officials and prison officials clearly say
it is a violation of applicable law.
Foreign governments understand Japanese law and international law better than Japanese people.

"Political party officials" who write on the net say the possibility
of following "There are precedents".

However, I think this is the first “violation of immigration law”
that occurred in June 2010.
1) “Inmate imprisonment” applies to foreigners in violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) Applying “supporters” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act to “crimes
for supporting other crimes” in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.

The reason for this crime is “support” for the offense
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
Specifically, it is an act of "providing" "false documents = employment contract" to the offender.
This action is used in the “right to investigate facts”.

In the past, the Minister of Justice has never conflicted with the prosecution
in “the right to investigate facts”.
Human rights ministers of justice cannot forgive "human rights violations" against foreigners.
So the prosecution consciously put foreigners in prison instead
of the traditional “fine penalty”.
Furthermore, the “applicable law” was falsified to make the Chinese “punishment”.
Using the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4, which is the discretion
of the Immigration Minister of Justice,
the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes” was applied consciously.

What I discovered after leaving the prison was a violation of the Immigration Law
of the Philippine Embassy.
In this trial process, "our case law" in 2011 was changed to "case law".
Of course, this “illegal case law example” must be “destroyed”.
I think that there are many cases of “illegal case law”
in addition to the Embassy of the Philippines.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.


Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-10-31: Monsieur, La loi japonaise est "Sei Grammar, loi écrite". Cependant, la "jurisprudence" est également considérée comme importante. Il y a des cas où les «lois» sont mal appliquées. Il faut du temps pour renverser le

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-10-31: Monsieur,
La loi japonaise est "Sei Grammar, loi écrite". Cependant, la "jurisprudence" est également considérée comme importante. Il y a des cas où les «lois» sont mal appliquées. Il faut du temps pour renverser le «cas» dans un procès réel. Cependant, même l'affaire de la Cour suprême peut être renversée. Le cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration de 2010 est un cas de violation du droit applicable. Toutefois, l'accusation a utilisé cette «affaire» pour commettre le même crime dans l'affaire de 2014 à l'ambassade des Philippines.


Partie 1 J'ai été arrêté en juin 2010. J'ai de nouveau été arrêté parce que je n'avais pas avoué.
J'ai gardé la justice à la recherche de "gouvernance sous la loi". Le résultat était «inculpé».
Le procès a débuté en octobre 2010.
La raison en est que le Chinois «Kin Gungaku», qui était considéré comme «complice», doit être renvoyé en Chine d'ici la fin du mois d'octobre.
Je pense que cet engagement secret tient compte de la peine imposée par le droit de l'immigration.
D'après l'accusation, il est nécessaire de «rentrer» d'ici à fin octobre dans le cadre d'un accord avec la Chine.
Pour la première fois, j'ai appris que la «loi sur les infractions en matière d'immigration» avait un «arrangement» pour une «période de détention».
Moi et "Kin Gungaku" sommes responsables du crime parce qu'ils ont fourni un "faux contrat de travail" à quatre Chinois.
Le motif du crime est "l'action" qui a "soutenu" l'infraction à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Par ailleurs, de nombreux avocats, parlementaires et personnes apparentées ne font aucun commentaire.
Cependant, les responsables gouvernementaux étrangers et les responsables de l'administration pénitentiaire affirment clairement qu'il s'agit d'une violation du droit applicable.
Les gouvernements étrangers comprennent mieux le droit japonais et le droit international que le peuple japonais.

Les «officiels des partis politiques» qui écrivent sur le net disent la possibilité de suivre «Il y a des précédents».

Cependant, je pense que c'est la première «violation de la loi sur l'immigration» qui s'est produite en juin 2010.
1) L '«emprisonnement d'un détenu» s'applique aux étrangers en violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
2) Application des «sympathisants» de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration aux «crimes à l'appui d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62

La raison de ce crime est le "soutien" de l'infraction à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Plus précisément, il s’agit de "fournir" au "contrevenant" "faux documents = contrat de travail".
Cette action est utilisée dans le «droit d'enquêter sur les faits».

Par le passé, le ministre de la Justice n'avait jamais contesté les poursuites engagées contre le «droit d'enquêter sur des faits».
Les ministres de la justice des droits de l'homme ne peuvent pardonner "les violations des droits de l'homme" commises contre des étrangers.
L’accusation a donc consciemment mis les étrangers en prison au lieu de la traditionnelle «amende».
De plus, la «loi applicable» a été falsifiée pour imposer aux Chinois une «punition».
En utilisant l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration, qui est laissé à la discrétion du ministre de l'Immigration,
"Péché pour assister d'autres crimes" a été appliqué.

Ce que j'ai découvert après avoir quitté la prison était une violation de la loi sur l'immigration de l'ambassade des Philippines.
Dans ce procès, "notre jurisprudence" en 2011 a été changée en "jurisprudence".
Bien entendu, cet «exemple de jurisprudence illégale» doit être «détruit».
Je pense qu'il existe de nombreux cas de «jurisprudence illégale» en plus de l'ambassade des Philippines.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "soutien de l'article 22-4-4 loi sur l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Cependant, "écraser" par le pouvoir de l’État signifie "arrêter" de "délai de prescription".

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche a ce problème.
J'ai répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution satisfaisante.
J'attends le résultat Je ne m'attends pas à des mensonges.

Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-10-31: Sehr geehrter Herr, Das japanische Recht ist "Sei Grammatik, geschriebenes Recht". Die "Rechtsprechung" wird jedoch auch als wichtig angesehen. Es gibt einige Fälle, in denen „Gesetze“ falsch angewendet werden. Es braucht Zeit,

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-10-31: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Das japanische Recht ist "Sei Grammatik, geschriebenes Recht". Die "Rechtsprechung" wird jedoch auch als wichtig angesehen. Es gibt einige Fälle, in denen „Gesetze“ falsch angewendet werden. Es braucht Zeit, um den "Fall" in einem tatsächlichen Prozess zu stürzen. Allerdings kann auch der Fall des Obersten Gerichtshofs aufgehoben werden. Der Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz 2010 ist ein Verstoß gegen geltendes Recht. Die Staatsanwaltschaft nutzte diesen „Fall“ jedoch, um das gleiche Verbrechen im Fall der philippinischen Botschaft 2014 zu begehen.


Teil 1. Ich wurde im Juni 2010 verhaftet. Ich wurde erneut verhaftet, weil ich nicht gestand.
Ich habe Gerechtigkeit auf der Suche nach "Governance unter dem Gesetz" bewahrt. Das Ergebnis wurde "angeklagt".
Der Prozess begann im Oktober 2010.
Der Grund dafür ist, dass der chinesische „Kin Gungaku“, der als „Komplize“ galt, bis Ende Oktober nach China zurückgeschickt werden muss.
Ich denke, dass dieses geheime Versprechen in Anbetracht der Verurteilung des Einwanderungsrechts festgelegt wird.
Der Staatsanwaltschaft zufolge ist es in einem Abkommen mit China erforderlich, bis Ende Oktober „repatriiert“ zu werden.
Zum ersten Mal erfuhr ich, dass das „Immigrationsverletzungsgesetz“ eine „Regelung“ für die „Haftzeit“ enthält.
Ich und "Kin Gungaku" sind für das Verbrechen verantwortlich, weil sie vier Chinesen einen "falschen Arbeitsvertrag" zur Verfügung gestellt haben.
Der Grund für die Straftat ist die „Aktion“, die die Straftat gemäß Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes „unterstützt“ hat.

Auf der anderen Seite sind viele Anwälte, Parlamentarier und verwandte Personen "kein Kommentar".
Ausländische Regierungsbeamte und Gefängnisbeamte sagen jedoch eindeutig, dass es sich um einen Verstoß gegen geltendes Recht handelt.
Ausländische Regierungen verstehen japanisches Recht und internationales Recht besser als Japaner.

"Politische Parteibeamte", die im Internet schreiben, sagen, dass es die Möglichkeit gibt, "Präzedenzfälle" zu verfolgen.

Ich denke jedoch, dass dies der erste „Verstoß gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz“ ist, der im Juni 2010 stattgefunden hat.
1) „Inhaftierung von Insassen“ gilt für Ausländer, die gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstoßen.
2) Anwendung von "Unterstützern" in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes auf "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs.

Der Grund für dieses Verbrechen ist die „Unterstützung“ der Straftat gemäß Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
Im Einzelnen handelt es sich um die "Bereitstellung" von "falschen Dokumenten = Arbeitsvertrag" für den Täter.
Diese Aktion wird im "Recht, Tatsachen zu untersuchen" verwendet.

In der Vergangenheit hat der Justizminister nie mit der Strafverfolgung im „Recht, Tatsachen zu untersuchen“ in Konflikt geraten.
Menschenrechtsminister können "Menschenrechtsverletzungen" gegen Ausländer nicht vergeben.
Deshalb hat die Staatsanwaltschaft Ausländer statt der traditionellen „Geldstrafe“ bewusst ins Gefängnis gesteckt.
Darüber hinaus wurde das „anwendbare Recht“ gefälscht, um die chinesische „Bestrafung“ zu erreichen.
Unter Anwendung des Einwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4, der im Ermessen des Justizministers für Einwanderungsfragen liegt,
"Sünde, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen" wurde angewandt.

Was ich nach dem Verlassen des Gefängnisses entdeckte, war eine Verletzung des Einwanderungsgesetzes der philippinischen Botschaft.
In diesem Prozess wurde "unsere Rechtsprechung" im Jahr 2011 in "Rechtsprechung" geändert.
Natürlich muss dieses „illegale Rechtsprechungsbeispiel“ „vernichtet“ werden.
Ich denke, dass es neben der Botschaft der Philippinen viele Fälle von „illegaler Rechtsprechung“ gibt.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" "Menschenrechtsverletzung" durch die japanische Regierung.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten Sie um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere „Honor Recovery and Compensation“ durchgeführt wird.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird. Aber verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten andere „illegale Arbeit“ als „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen den Grundsatz der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es "willkürlich" verbietet, nur Ausländer "zu bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
In diesem Fall gibt es keine „Person, die andere Straftaten des Strafgesetzbuchs“ gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes unterstützt hat.
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat, philippinischer Botschaftsbeamter" ist unschuldig.

2. Die Anklage ist, weil "Unterstützung von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, die andere Verbrechen unterstützt".
Dies ist gesetzlich unlogisch.

Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Die Logik des Gesetzes ist völlig verrückt.

Die japanische Regierung hat "verknallt" "verklagt".
Allerdings ist „zermalmen“ durch die Staatsmacht ein „Stopp“ der „Verjährungsfrist“.

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus hat dieses Problem.
Ich antwortete, dass ich ernsthaft eine zufriedenstellende Lösung erwäge.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich erwarte keine Lügen.


Nachschrift:
Es gibt viele amerikanische Opfer. Ich habe es mit diesem Auge gesehen.
Die Amerikaner sind auch nicht schuldig, wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft den Arbeitgeber nicht festnimmt.
Die US-Regierung sollte die Wiederherstellung und Entschädigung der amerikanischen Ehre fordern.
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Sue" zu "ICC".


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-31: Dear Sir,However, even the Supreme Court case may be overturned. The 2010 Immigration Law violation case is a case of violation of applicable law. However, the prosecution used this “case” to commit the same crime in the 2014 Philippines Embassy case.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-10-31: Dear Sir,
Japanese law is "Sei Grammar, written law". However, "case law" is also regarded as important. There are some cases where “laws” are wrongly applied. It takes time to overthrow the “case” in an actual trial. However, even the Supreme Court case may be overturned. The 2010 Immigration Law violation case is a case of violation of applicable law. However, the prosecution used this “case” to commit the same crime in the 2014 Philippines Embassy case.


Part 1. I was arrested in June 2010.
I was arrested again because I did not confess.
I kept justice in search of "governance under the law". The result was “indicted”.
The trial started in October 2010.
The reason is that the Chinese “Kin Gungaku”,
who was considered “accomplice,” must be sent back to China by the end of October.
I think this secret pledge is set in consideration of the sentencing of immigration law.
From the prosecution, he says that it is necessary to “repatriate”
by the end of October in an agreement with China.
For the first time, I learned that “Immigration Violation Law” had “arrangement”
for “detention period”.
Me and "Kin Gungaku" are responsible for the crime
because they provided a "false employment contract" to four Chinese.
The reason for the crime is the “action” that “supported” the offense
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

On the other hand, many lawyers, parliamentarians and related persons are "no comment".
But foreign government officials and prison officials clearly say
it is a violation of applicable law.
Foreign governments understand Japanese law and international law better than Japanese people.

"Political party officials" who write on the net say the possibility
of following "There are precedents".

However, I think this is the first “violation of immigration law”
that occurred in June 2010.
1) “Inmate imprisonment” applies to foreigners in violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) Applying “supporters” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act to “crimes
for supporting other crimes” in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.

The reason for this crime is “support” for the offense
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
Specifically, it is an act of "providing" "false documents = employment contract" to the offender.
This action is used in the “right to investigate facts”.

In the past, the Minister of Justice has never conflicted with the prosecution
in “the right to investigate facts”.
Human rights ministers of justice cannot forgive "human rights violations" against foreigners.
So the prosecution consciously put foreigners in prison instead
of the traditional “fine penalty”.
Furthermore, the “applicable law” was falsified to make the Chinese “punishment”.
Using the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4, which is the discretion
of the Immigration Minister of Justice,
the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes” was applied consciously.

What I discovered after leaving the prison was a violation of the Immigration Law
of the Philippine Embassy.
In this trial process, "our case law" in 2011 was changed to "case law".
Of course, this “illegal case law example” must be “destroyed”.
I think that there are many cases of “illegal case law”
in addition to the Embassy of the Philippines.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.


Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.


PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To everyone in the world's media 019-10-31: Dear Sir, Japanese law is "Sei Grammar, written law". However, "case law" is also regarded as important. There are some cases where “laws” are wrongly applied. It takes time to overthrow the “case” in an actual trial.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-10-31: Dear Sir,
Japanese law is "Sei Grammar, written law". However, "case law" is also regarded as important. There are some cases where “laws” are wrongly applied. It takes time to overthrow the “case” in an actual trial. However, even the Supreme Court case may be overturned. The 2010 Immigration Law violation case is a case of violation of applicable law. However, the prosecution used this “case” to commit the same crime in the 2014 Philippines Embassy case.


Part 1. I was arrested in June 2010.
I was arrested again because I did not confess.
I kept justice in search of "governance under the law". The result was “indicted”.
The trial started in October 2010.
The reason is that the Chinese “Kin Gungaku”,
who was considered “accomplice,” must be sent back to China by the end of October.
I think this secret pledge is set in consideration of the sentencing of immigration law.
From the prosecution, he says that it is necessary to “repatriate”
by the end of October in an agreement with China.
For the first time, I learned that “Immigration Violation Law” had “arrangement”
for “detention period”.
Me and "Kin Gungaku" are responsible for the crime
because they provided a "false employment contract" to four Chinese.
The reason for the crime is the “action” that “supported” the offense
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.

On the other hand, many lawyers, parliamentarians and related persons are "no comment".
But foreign government officials and prison officials clearly say
it is a violation of applicable law.
Foreign governments understand Japanese law and international law better than Japanese people.

"Political party officials" who write on the net say the possibility
of following "There are precedents".

However, I think this is the first “violation of immigration law”
that occurred in June 2010.
1) “Inmate imprisonment” applies to foreigners in violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) Applying “supporters” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act to “crimes
for supporting other crimes” in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.

The reason for this crime is “support” for the offense
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
Specifically, it is an act of "providing" "false documents = employment contract" to the offender.
This action is used in the “right to investigate facts”.

In the past, the Minister of Justice has never conflicted with the prosecution
in “the right to investigate facts”.
Human rights ministers of justice cannot forgive "human rights violations" against foreigners.
So the prosecution consciously put foreigners in prison instead
of the traditional “fine penalty”.
Furthermore, the “applicable law” was falsified to make the Chinese “punishment”.
Using the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4, which is the discretion
of the Immigration Minister of Justice,
the Criminal Code “Sinners to Support Other Crimes” was applied consciously.

What I discovered after leaving the prison was a violation of the Immigration Law
of the Philippine Embassy.
In this trial process, "our case law" in 2011 was changed to "case law".
Of course, this “illegal case law example” must be “destroyed”.
I think that there are many cases of “illegal case law”
in addition to the Embassy of the Philippines.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.


Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.



Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp