Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-11-12: Sehr geehrter Herr, "Ein Botschafter eines Landes" sagte mir. "Mein Land wird von der japanischen Regierung unterstützt", deshalb kann ich es der japanischen Regierung nicht sagen, aber ich persönlich erzähle es intern

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-11-12: Sehr geehrter Herr,
"Ein Botschafter eines Landes" sagte mir. "Mein Land wird von der japanischen Regierung unterstützt", deshalb kann ich es der japanischen Regierung nicht sagen, aber ich persönlich erzähle es internationalen Organisationen. Erstens sollten "große Länder wie China und die Vereinigten Staaten" die japanische Regierung "anfordern". Natürlich sende ich diese E-Mail jeden Tag an Abes offiziellen Wohnsitz.


Teil 1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“.
Aber wenn der Arbeitgeber unschuldig ist, ist der Ausländer unschuldig.

Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Ich wurde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das illegale Beschäftigung gefördert hat), aber ich wurde nicht bestraft.

Die Staatsanwälte verfügen über einen Ermessensspielraum.
Die Bestrafung der Kausalität „nur eine Seite“ verstößt jedoch gegen Artikel 14 „Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz“.

Der Staatsanwalt sagte dem Arbeitgeber, dass der Arbeitgeber das Gesetz in Artikel 72-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes nicht kenne.
Wir werden nicht darüber verfügen, wenn es kein "Vorsatz" gibt.
In diesem Fall können Ausländer nicht „entsorgt“ werden.

So im Juli 2010 geändert wir die Immigration Control Act Artikel 73-2.
Das Gesetz besagt, dass „Sie der Bestrafung nicht entgehen können, weil Sie das Gesetz nicht kennen“.
Es ist ein seltsames Gesetz.
Darüber hinaus gab es eine dreijährige „Nachfrist“.

Beamte der philippinischen Botschaft wurden jedoch wegen „Verstoßes gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz“ bestraft.
"Philippinen mit spezifiziertem Visum" wurden verhaftet, weil sie gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstoßen hatten, als sie in anderen "Landschaftsgeschäften" als "spezifiziertem Visum" gearbeitet hatten.
Landschaftsbau wird jedoch nicht bestraft.

Dieser Vorfall ereignete sich von 2014 bis 2015.
Sie sollten „Landschaftsbau“ bestrafen, den Sie illegal eingestellt haben.
Wenn Sie den "Landschaftsbau" nicht bestrafen, sind die "Philippinen" auch "unschuldig".
Dies verstößt gegen Artikel 14 der "Verfassung Japans".

Darüber hinaus, wird dies verstößt auch da nur der Ausländer „internationale Menschenrechtsabkomme“ bestraft hat.
Die japanische Regierung hat die ausländische Regierung "dumm" gemacht, da "die ausländische Regierung das japanische Recht nicht kennt".
Es gab einen größeren Grund. (Dies ist der erste Satz.)

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Und die „bewusste“ und unter Verletzung des einzigen Ausländers im internationalen Recht, das die „Bestrafung“ verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
"Angewandte" Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs "Sünder, die andere Verbrechen unterstützen" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "falsches Gesetz anzuwenden".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es war nicht mit Strafe (alten Gesetz Artikel 70, Artikel 74 6).
Diejenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Die so der Klägerin Agentur als Verwaltungs scrivener und Schulpersonal waren mit Strafe
Der überarbeitete Immigration Control Act wurde im ersten 192-mal außerordentlichen Sitzungsperiode des Parlaments in Kraft gesetzt.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für die Straftat“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes ist für Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes nicht ursächlich.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
Allerdings ist "etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht
"Stop" in "Altern, Statistik der Einschränkungen".

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus hat dieses Problem.
Ich antwortete, dass ich ernsthaft eine zufriedenstellende Lösung erwäge.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis
Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

 Nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns für alle Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-12: Dear Sir,irst, "big countries such as China and the United States" should "request" the Japanese government. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-11-12: Dear Sir,
“A ambassador of a country” told me. “My country is supported by the Japanese government,” so I can't tell the Japanese government, but I personally tell international organizations. First, "big countries such as China and the United States" should "request" the Japanese government. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But if the employer is innocent, the foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
In contrast, the Immigration Act punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment), but does not punish them.

Prosecutors have “discretionary power”.
However, punishment of causal “one side only” violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law”.

The prosecution will not dispose of the employer as having no “intentional” reason
because the employer did not know the law in Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
If this is the case, foreigners cannot be “disposed”.

Therefore, in July 2010, Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act was amended.
The law states that “you cannot escape the punishment because you do not know the law”.
It's a strange law.
Moreover, there was a three-year “grace period”.

However, officials from the Embassy of the Philippines were punished
for “violating the Immigration Act”.
“Philippines with Specified Visa” were arrested for violating Article 70
of the Immigration Act while working at “landscaping stores” other than “Specified Visa”.
However, “Landscaping” will not be punished.

This incident occurred from 2014 to 2015.
You should punish “landscaping” that you hired illegally.
If you don't punish the "landscaping shop", the "Philippines" are "innocent".
This violates Article 14 of the “Constitution of Japan”.

This also violates the International Convention on Human Rights because it
only punishes foreigners.
The Japanese government has made the foreign government “stupid”
as “foreign government does not know Japanese law”.
There was a bigger reason. (This is the first sentence.)

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
  However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62
of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.


Yasuhiro Nagano


PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To everyone in the world's media 2019-11-12: Dear Sir, “A ambassador of a country” told me. “My country is supported by the Japanese government,” so I can't tell the Japanese government, but I personally tell international organizations.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-11-12: Dear Sir,
“A ambassador of a country” told me. “My country is supported by the Japanese government,” so I can't tell the Japanese government, but I personally tell international organizations. First, "big countries such as China and the United States" should "request" the Japanese government. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But if the employer is innocent, the foreigner is innocent.

Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
In contrast, the Immigration Act punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act
 (a crime that promotes illegal employment), but does not punish them.

Prosecutors have “discretionary power”.
However, punishment of causal “one side only” violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law”.

The prosecution will not dispose of the employer as having no “intentional” reason
because the employer did not know the law in Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
If this is the case, foreigners cannot be “disposed”.

Therefore, in July 2010, Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act was amended.
The law states that “you cannot escape the punishment because you do not know the law”.
It's a strange law.
Moreover, there was a three-year “grace period”.

However, officials from the Embassy of the Philippines were punished
for “violating the Immigration Act”.
“Philippines with Specified Visa” were arrested for violating Article 70
of the Immigration Act while working at “landscaping stores” other than “Specified Visa”.
However, “Landscaping” will not be punished.

This incident occurred from 2014 to 2015.
You should punish “landscaping” that you hired illegally.
If you don't punish the "landscaping shop", the "Philippines" are "innocent".
This violates Article 14 of the “Constitution of Japan”.

This also violates the International Convention on Human Rights because it
only punishes foreigners.
The Japanese government has made the foreign government “stupid”
as “foreign government does not know Japanese law”.
There was a bigger reason. (This is the first sentence.)

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
  However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62
of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Is there only `` terrorism '' to win power? 朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩 2019-11-11：亲爱的先生， 每个国家的政府和媒体应进行“每个国家的受害者调查”。

朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩


2019-11-11：亲爱的先生，
每个国家的政府和媒体应进行“每个国家的受害者调查”。在日本因在“居留身份以外的劳工中”工作而受到“惩罚”的“人”，以及向外国人发出“虚假证件”的“受到惩罚的人”是“无辜的”。许多外国人是受害者。当然，我每天都会将此电子邮件发送到安倍晋三的官邸。


第一部分我“起诉”日本政府的非法“对违反移民法的处罚”。
我起诉了两个违规行为。
1）违反《移民管制法》第70条处理的外国人无罪，因为他们违反了《宪法》第14条的“法律下的平等”规定。
2）那些因提供虚假文件而受到刑事惩罚的人是完全无辜的。
日本政府应“惩罚”“司法官员”。

我不仅为我而战，也为中国人，菲律宾人和世界许多受害者而战。
2010年，“我和我”受到了惩罚。
发生同样的问题是因为中国政府没有抗议这种非法惩罚。
2014年和2015年，这起事件发生在菲律宾大使馆。
这与2010年的“案例”完全相同。

除此之外，还有许多其他“非法惩罚”，
我没有“详细信息”。但是我认为有无数的“类似侵权行为”。

一种是外国人在日本从事“居民身份以外的工作”的情况。
“非法劳动”并非仅由外国人“确立”。
这是因为有些“雇主”雇用“非法工作的外国人”。
因此，《移民法》以明确的因果关系进行惩罚。
外国人将受到《移民法》第70条的处罚。
雇主将根据《移民控制法》第72-2条受到处罚。
但是，只有外国人应受惩罚，雇主不应受惩罚。这里有问题。
这违反了日本宪法第14条“法律之下的平等”。
因此，如果雇主是无辜的，外国人也是无辜的。

其次，向外国人提供“虚假文件”，
外国人获得“居民身份”（侵犯移民22-4-4）。
但是，该行为不会受到第31条“法律管辖”的惩罚。
司法部长的“行政处置”是不可能的“刑事处置”。
在日本，只有根据“法律”，才有可能进行“逮捕和拘禁”及惩罚。

检方认为这只是“你的逻辑”，
这不只是我的逻辑。
在2017年1月，该行动将“受到惩罚”。
“法律得到执行”。
您不能根据《宪法》第39条追究惩罚。
“我和中国亲戚”和“菲律宾使馆官员和外交官”都是100％无辜的。

许多中国人正在访问日本。
因此，“许多中国人”是“受害者”。
我指出，中国政府已经开始调查这起事件的受害者。
各国政府也应开始调查受害者。

明天将继续。


请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。


请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人，
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。
但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。
但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《刑法》第60条和第62条与《移民管制法》第70条相对
“支持其他罪行的犯罪”的“适用”是“适用法律中的错误”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上，《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束（第70条，第74-6条）。
那些通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人，协助此工作的工作场所，
律师，行政书记员和学校工作人员等申请人将受到罚款
修订后的《移民控制法》是在第192届国会特别会议上颁布的。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100％“无辜的”。

“参考”：外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是，被国家权力“压垮”是“衰老，局限性统计”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。
最好的问候。长野康广

PS：白宫回答我，我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。

长野康广



请询问最高领导人金正恩（*）


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的，所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是，英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天，联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


要移动世界，您需要
“核导弹”或“巨额资金”。
依附于核导弹的金正恩先生的想法似乎是正确的。
中文单词。
“没有人民的信任，就没有政府”。
请让朝鲜公民“重要”。


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To President Trump 2019-11-11: Dear Sir, Governments and media in each country should conduct “investigation of victims in each country”. "Per

To President Trump


2019-11-11: Dear Sir,
Governments and media in each country should conduct “investigation of victims in each country”. "Persons" who have been "punished" by working in "labor outside of resident status" in Japan, and "persons who have been punished" for issuing "false documents" to foreigners are "innocent". Many foreigners are victims. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. I “sue” the Japanese government's illegal “punishment for violation of immigration law”.
I sued two violations.
1) Foreigners disposed of in violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act are not guilty because they violate "Equality
under the Law" of Article 14 of the Constitution.
2) Those who have been criminally punishable for delivering false documents are completely innocent.
The Japanese government should “punish” “judicial officials”.

I am fighting not only for me, but also for the Chinese, the Filippins,
and the many victims of the world.
In 2010, “Chinese and I” were punished.
The same problem occurred because the Chinese government did not protest this illegal punishment.
In 2014 and 2015, it occurred at the Embassy of the Philippines.
This is exactly the same as the 2010 “case”.

There are many other “illegal punishments”, but I do n’t have “detailed information”.
But I think there are countless "similar violations".

One is when a foreigner does "work other than resident status" in Japan.
“Illegal labor” is not “established” by foreigners alone.
This is because there are “employers” who employ “foreigners who work illegally”.
Therefore, the Immigration Law punishes with a clear causal relationship.
Foreigners will be punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Law.
Employers will be punished under Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreigners are punishable and employers are not punishable. There is a problem here.
This violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law” of the Japanese Constitution.
Therefore, if the employer is innocent, the foreigner is also innocent.

The second is to provide “false documents” to foreigners and to obtain “resident status”
 (in violation of Immigration 22-4-4).
However, this action cannot be punished by Article 31 “Governance under the Law”.
“Criminal disposition” is not possible for “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
In Japan, “Arrest and confinement” and punishment are possible only under “law”.

The prosecution dismisses this as "only you" logic, but this is not "only me" logic.
In January 2017, the act was “enforced” to “punish” this act because it cannot be punished.
You cannot punish retroactively according to Article 39 of the Constitution.
“Me and Chinese kinGungaku” and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” are 100% innocent.

Many Chinese are visiting Japan.
Therefore, “many Chinese” are “victims”.
The Chinese government has begun investigating the victims of the incident I point out.
National governments should also start investigating victims.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes in Article 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-11-11: Monsieur, Les gouvernements et les médias de chaque pays devraient «mener une enquête sur les victimes dans chaque pays». Les "personnes" qui ont été "punies" en

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-11-11: Monsieur,
Les gouvernements et les médias de chaque pays devraient «mener une enquête sur les victimes dans chaque pays». Les "personnes" qui ont été "punies" en travaillant au "travail en dehors du statut de résident" au Japon et "qui ont été punies" parce qu'elles ont délivré de "faux documents" à des étrangers sont "innocentes". De nombreux étrangers sont des victimes. Bien sûr, je continue d'envoyer chaque jour ce courrier électronique à la résidence officielle d'Abe.


Partie 1 Je «poursuis» la «punition illégale pour violation du droit de l'immigration» du gouvernement japonais.
J'ai poursuivi deux violations.
1) Les étrangers qui ont été aliénés en violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration ne sont pas coupables car ils violent l'article 14 «Égalité devant la loi»
2) Ceux qui ont été punis pénalement pour avoir délivré de faux documents sont totalement innocents.
Le gouvernement japonais devrait «punir» les «agents judiciaires».

Je me bats non seulement pour moi, mais aussi pour les Chinois, les Philippins et les nombreuses victimes du monde.
En 2010, “Chinese and I” ont été punis.
Le même problème s'est produit parce que le gouvernement chinois n'a pas protesté contre ce châtiment illégal.
En 2014 et 2015, cela s'est passé à l'ambassade des Philippines.
C'est exactement la même chose que le «cas» de 2010.

Il y a beaucoup d'autres "punitions illégales" autres que cela,
Je n'ai pas "d'informations détaillées". Mais je pense qu'il existe d'innombrables "violations similaires".

La première est lorsqu'un étranger "travaille autre que le statut de résident" au Japon.
Le «travail illégal» n'est pas «établi» par les seuls étrangers.
En effet, il existe des "employeurs" qui emploient des "étrangers qui travaillent illégalement".
Par conséquent, la loi sur l'immigration punit avec une relation de cause à effet claire.
Les étrangers seront punis en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Les employeurs seront punis en vertu de l'article 72-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Cependant, seuls les étrangers sont punissables et les employeurs ne le sont pas. Il y a un problème ici.
Cela viole l'article 14 «Égalité devant la loi» de la Constitution japonaise.
Par conséquent, si l’employeur est innocent, l’étranger est également innocent.

Deuxièmement, fournir de «faux documents» aux étrangers,
Un étranger obtient un «statut de résident» (violation de l'Immigration 22-4-4).
Toutefois, cette action ne peut être sanctionnée par l’article 31 «Gouvernance de la loi».
Une «décision pénale» n'est pas possible pour une «décision administrative» du ministre de la Justice.
Au Japon, «l’arrestation et la détention» et la punition ne sont possibles que dans le cadre de la «loi».

L'accusation rejette cela comme "la logique de vous seulement",
Ce n'est pas juste ma logique.
En janvier 2017, cette action sera «punissable».
“La loi a été appliquée”.
Vous ne pouvez pas punir rétroactivement conformément à l'article 39 de la Constitution.
«Moi et les Chinois kinGungaku» et «les diplomates et ambassades de l’ambassade des Philippines» sont à 100% innocents.

Beaucoup de Chinois visitent le Japon.
Par conséquent, «beaucoup de Chinois» sont des «victimes».
Le gouvernement chinois a commencé à enquêter sur les victimes de l'incident que je souligne.
Les gouvernements nationaux devraient également commencer à enquêter sur les victimes.

Cela continuera demain.


Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".


Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Voir «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
«Révisé le 4 novembre 2019»
Je ne suis pas seulement chinois et philippin,
Se battre pour de nombreuses victimes dans le monde.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence».
Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).
Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Cela est clairement contraire à l’article 14 «Principes d’égalité juridique» de la Constitution japonaise.
Il enfreint le droit international qui interdit "consciemment" de "punir" uniquement les étrangers.
Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent". .

2 La poursuite est due à "l'appui de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
"Applicable" pour "crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes" est "erreur de droit applicable".
"L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration" concerne les personnes qui ont obtenu le statut de résident par le biais d'une fausse demande.
:::::
Traditionnellement, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'appliquait à ceux qui avaient obtenu le statut de résident par de fausses demandes.
Il n'était pas soumis à une réglementation pénale (article 70, article 74-6).
Ceux qui ont obtenu le statut de résidence grâce à une fausse demande, le lieu de travail qui l’a aidé,
Les candidats tels que les avocats, les administrateurs et le personnel scolaire sont passibles de sanctions.
La loi révisée sur le contrôle de l'immigration a été adoptée à la 192ème session de la Diète extraordinaire.
«En vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2017».
:::::
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin et employé de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis à 100% "innocent".

"Référence": loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le procureur est "écraser quelque chose dans sa main".
Cependant, "écraser quelque chose dans sa main" avec le pouvoir de l'État est un "arrêt" de "vieillissement, statistiques de limitations".

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat J'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mensonge.

Yasuhiro Nagano



Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-11-11: Sehr geehrter Herr, Regierungen und Medien in jedem Land sollten "Ermittlungen gegen Opfer in jedem Land" durchführen. "Personen", die in Japan "bestraft" wurden, indem sie

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-11-11: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Regierungen und Medien in jedem Land sollten "Ermittlungen gegen Opfer in jedem Land" durchführen. "Personen", die in Japan "bestraft" wurden, indem sie "außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus arbeiteten", und "die für die Weitergabe" falscher Dokumente "an Ausländer bestraft wurden, sind" unschuldig ". Viele Ausländer sind Opfer. Natürlich sende ich diese E-Mail jeden Tag an Abes offiziellen Wohnsitz.


Teil 1. Ich „verklage“ die illegale „Bestrafung wegen Verstoßes gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz“ der japanischen Regierung.
Ich habe zwei Verstöße verklagt.
1) Ausländer, die gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstoßen, sind nicht schuldig, weil sie gegen Artikel 14 „Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz“ verstoßen.
2) Diejenigen, die für die Lieferung falscher Dokumente strafbar waren, sind völlig unschuldig.
Die japanische Regierung sollte "Justizbeamte" "bestrafen".

Ich kämpfe nicht nur für mich, sondern auch für die Chinesen, die Philippinen und die vielen Opfer der Welt.
2010 wurden „Chinese und ich“ bestraft.
Dasselbe Problem trat auf, weil die chinesische Regierung gegen diese rechtswidrige Bestrafung nicht protestierte.
In den Jahren 2014 und 2015 fand es in der Botschaft der Philippinen statt.
Dies ist genau das gleiche wie der 2010 "Fall".

Es gibt viele andere "illegale Bestrafungen" als diese,
Ich habe keine "detaillierten Informationen". Aber ich denke, es gibt unzählige "ähnliche Verstöße".

Eine davon ist, wenn ein Ausländer in Japan "eine andere Arbeit als seinen Wohnsitz" hat.
"Illegale Arbeit" wird nicht nur von Ausländern "etabliert".
Dies liegt daran, dass es „Arbeitgeber“ gibt, die „illegal arbeitende Ausländer“ beschäftigen.
Das Zuwanderungsgesetz straft daher mit einem eindeutigen Kausalzusammenhang.
Ausländer werden nach Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes bestraft.
Arbeitgeber werden nach Artikel 72-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes bestraft.
Allerdings sind nur Ausländer strafbar und Arbeitgeber nicht strafbar. Hier liegt ein Problem vor.
Dies verstößt gegen Artikel 14 „Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Wenn also der Arbeitgeber unschuldig ist, ist auch der Ausländer unschuldig.

Zweitens bieten "falsche Dokumente" für Ausländer,
Ein Ausländer erhält einen „Aufenthaltsstatus“ (Zuwanderungsverletzung 22-4-4).
Diese Handlung kann jedoch nicht mit Artikel 31 „Regieren nach dem Gesetz“ geahndet werden.
"Kriminelle Disposition" ist für "Administrative Disposition" durch den Justizminister nicht möglich.
In Japan sind „Festnahme und Inhaftierung“ und Bestrafung nur nach „Gesetz“ möglich.

Die Staatsanwaltschaft weist dies als "die Logik von dir allein" ab.
Das ist nicht nur meine Logik.
Im Januar 2017 wird diese Aktion „strafbar“ sein.
"Das Gesetz wurde durchgesetzt".
Sie können nicht rückwirkend nach Artikel 39 der Verfassung bestrafen.
"Ich und chinesische KinGungaku" und "philippinische Botschaftsbeamte und Diplomaten" sind zu 100% unschuldig.

Viele Chinesen besuchen Japan.
Deshalb sind "viele Chinesen" "Opfer".
Die chinesische Regierung hat begonnen, die Opfer des Vorfalls, auf den ich hinweise, zu untersuchen.
Die nationalen Regierungen sollten auch Ermittlungen gegen Opfer aufnehmen.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.


Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.


Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“.
Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "bewusste" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
"Anwendbar" für "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" ist "Fehler im anwendbaren Recht".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es unterlag keinen strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen (Artikel 70, Artikel 74-6).
Diejenigen, die durch falsche Bewerbung den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben, den Arbeitsplatz, der dies unterstützt hat,
Bewerber wie Anwälte, Verwaltungsangestellte und Schulpersonal werden bestraft
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz wurde auf der 192. außerordentlichen Landtagssitzung verabschiedet.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
"Etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht ist jedoch "Stopp" des "Alterns, Statistik der Einschränkungen".

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Viele Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-11: Dear Sir,I “sue” the Japanese government's illegal “punishment for violation of immigration law”. I sued two violations.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-11-11: Dear Sir,
Governments and media in each country should conduct “investigation of victims in each country”. "Persons" who have been "punished" by working in "labor outside of resident status" in Japan, and "persons who have been punished" for issuing "false documents" to foreigners are "innocent". Many foreigners are victims. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. I “sue” the Japanese government's illegal “punishment for violation of immigration law”.
I sued two violations.
1) Foreigners disposed of in violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act are not guilty because they violate "Equality
under the Law" of Article 14 of the Constitution.
2) Those who have been criminally punishable for delivering false documents are completely innocent.
The Japanese government should “punish” “judicial officials”.

I am fighting not only for me, but also for the Chinese, the Filippins,
and the many victims of the world.
In 2010, “Chinese and I” were punished.
The same problem occurred because the Chinese government did not protest this illegal punishment.
In 2014 and 2015, it occurred at the Embassy of the Philippines.
This is exactly the same as the 2010 “case”.

There are many other “illegal punishments”, but I do n’t have “detailed information”.
But I think there are countless "similar violations".

One is when a foreigner does "work other than resident status" in Japan.
“Illegal labor” is not “established” by foreigners alone.
This is because there are “employers” who employ “foreigners who work illegally”.
Therefore, the Immigration Law punishes with a clear causal relationship.
Foreigners will be punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Law.
Employers will be punished under Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreigners are punishable and employers are not punishable. There is a problem here.
This violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law” of the Japanese Constitution.
Therefore, if the employer is innocent, the foreigner is also innocent.

The second is to provide “false documents” to foreigners and to obtain “resident status”
 (in violation of Immigration 22-4-4).
However, this action cannot be punished by Article 31 “Governance under the Law”.
“Criminal disposition” is not possible for “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
In Japan, “Arrest and confinement” and punishment are possible only under “law”.

The prosecution dismisses this as "only you" logic, but this is not "only me" logic.
In January 2017, the act was “enforced” to “punish” this act because it cannot be punished.
You cannot punish retroactively according to Article 39 of the Constitution.
“Me and Chinese kinGungaku” and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” are 100% innocent.

Many Chinese are visiting Japan.
Therefore, “many Chinese” are “victims”.
The Chinese government has begun investigating the victims of the incident I point out.
National governments should also start investigating victims.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes in Article 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

People should destroy Japan's `` Kamikaze Justice ''! To everyone in the world's media 2019-11-11: Dear Sir, Governments and media in each country should conduct “investigation of victims in each country”. "Persons" who have been "punished" by working in "labor outside of resident status" in Japan, and "persons who have been punished" for issuing "false documents" to foreigners are "innocent". Many foreigners are victims. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-11-11: Dear Sir,
Governments and media in each country should conduct “investigation of victims in each country”. "Persons" who have been "punished" by working in "labor outside of resident status" in Japan, and "persons who have been punished" for issuing "false documents" to foreigners are "innocent". Many foreigners are victims. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. I “sue” the Japanese government's illegal “punishment for violation of immigration law”.
I sued two violations.
1) Foreigners disposed of in violation of Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act are not guilty because they violate "Equality
under the Law" of Article 14 of the Constitution.
2) Those who have been criminally punishable for delivering false documents are completely innocent.
The Japanese government should “punish” “judicial officials”.

I am fighting not only for me, but also for the Chinese, the Filippins,
and the many victims of the world.
In 2010, “Chinese and I” were punished.
The same problem occurred because the Chinese government did not protest this illegal punishment.
In 2014 and 2015, it occurred at the Embassy of the Philippines.
This is exactly the same as the 2010 “case”.

There are many other “illegal punishments”, but I do n’t have “detailed information”.
But I think there are countless "similar violations".

One is when a foreigner does "work other than resident status" in Japan.
“Illegal labor” is not “established” by foreigners alone.
This is because there are “employers” who employ “foreigners who work illegally”.
Therefore, the Immigration Law punishes with a clear causal relationship.
Foreigners will be punished under Article 70 of the Immigration Law.
Employers will be punished under Article 72-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, only foreigners are punishable and employers are not punishable. There is a problem here.
This violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law” of the Japanese Constitution.
Therefore, if the employer is innocent, the foreigner is also innocent.

The second is to provide “false documents” to foreigners and to obtain “resident status”
 (in violation of Immigration 22-4-4).
However, this action cannot be punished by Article 31 “Governance under the Law”.
“Criminal disposition” is not possible for “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
In Japan, “Arrest and confinement” and punishment are possible only under “law”.

The prosecution dismisses this as "only you" logic, but this is not "only me" logic.
In January 2017, the act was “enforced” to “punish” this act because it cannot be punished.
You cannot punish retroactively according to Article 39 of the Constitution.
“Me and Chinese kinGungaku” and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” are 100% innocent.

Many Chinese are visiting Japan.
Therefore, “many Chinese” are “victims”.
The Chinese government has begun investigating the victims of the incident I point out.
National governments should also start investigating victims.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes in Article 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

God! It ’s time for “you” to come out. November 10, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Dear Sir, The Iranian government has announced that it will enrich uranium beyond the limits of the nuclear agreement. “Non-nuclear states” are forced to “prostrate” the “unreasonable demands” of “nuclear states”. If you resist, you will receive “economic sanctions”. Unilateral dialogue is meaningless. The world can no longer talk only with "nuclear" and "terrorism". It's already over.

God! It ’s time for “you” to come out.

November 10, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Dear Sir,

The Iranian government has announced that it will enrich uranium beyond the limits of the nuclear agreement. “Non-nuclear states” are forced to “prostrate” the “unreasonable demands” of “nuclear states”. If you resist, you will receive “economic sanctions”. Unilateral dialogue is meaningless. The world can no longer talk only with "nuclear" and "terrorism". It's already over.

Part 1. The nuclear agreement was signed between the country and the West, China, and Russia with the aim of limiting Iran's nuclear development. However, the US left unilaterally in May last year and resumed economic sanctions on Iran. The country's economy has been hit hard.

Just one year after the withdrawal, in May this year, Iran demanded the remaining countries in China, France, Germany, Russia, and the UK to work to lift sanctions on the United States. The limit was 60 days later.

Iran also announced its intention to stop further implementation of the nuclear agreement 60 days later if the country's requirements are not met.

As a reference, uranium with a concentration of 90% or more is used for “nuclear weapons”.

"Nuclear countries" are the five major countries of the United States, Russia, United Kingdom, France and China. ,

However, India, Pakistan and North Korea have announced their possession and are conducting nuclear tests.

Israel is generally regarded as a nuclear power.

Several countries, such as Syria and Iraq, tried to have a “nuclear”.

But they failed to “hold”.

India and Pakistan seem to have succeeded in “joining” “nuclear states”.

The US has not yet approved North Korea ’s nuclear possession. Part 1. The nuclear agreement was signed between Iran and the West, China, and Russia to limit Iran's nuclear development.

However, in May last year, the United States left unilaterally and resumed economic sanctions on Iran.

Iran's economy has been hit hard.

In May of this year, exactly one year after the withdrawal, Iran demanded “make an effort” from China, France, Germany, Russia, and the UK to “release sanctions on the United States”.

The limit was 60 days later.

Iran also revealed that it would “take a step” to further “stop implementation” of the nuclear agreement again 60 days later if Iran ’s requirements were not met.

As a reference, uranium with a concentration of 90% or more is used for “nuclear weapons”.

Speaking from “a country that wants to own nuclear missiles”, “economic sanctions” would be an “unreasonable” demand.

The world is made up of “inequalities”.

Why are the five major countries allowed to own “nuclear”?

The United States and Russia have a lot of “nuclear”.

The international community has never heard of "adding" economic sanctions to them. There is also no “seeing”.

Why are the five major countries allowed to own “nuclear”?

There should be no clear answer.

The only thing is because it is a permanent member of the United Nations.

This is because it is a “victorious country” of World War II and a military power.

If that is the case, the only way to change this standard is to do “World War III”.

A few years later, India may challenge this.

Opportunities also come to North Korea and Iraq.

After all, the world is made up of wars.

People say peace is important.

I think a big contradiction will give rise to "war".

Part 2. We propose to build “special zones” in Europe and other countries.

Please read along with suggestions to the US (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see

Prosperity of each country is realized by the world being free, democratic, and “ruled under the law”.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/