11/15/2019

Help me!朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩 2019-11-15:亲爱的先生, 白宫表示“我们正在认真考虑”这个问题。美国人不应该“支持”不帮助美国人的特朗普总统。中

朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩


2019-11-15:亲爱的先生,
白宫表示“我们正在认真考虑”这个问题。美国人不应该“支持”不帮助美国人的特朗普总统。中国大使馆询问说:“我想听听我为中国人所做的事情”。菲律宾政府也应采取行动。许多有受害者的国家也应搬家。当然,我每天都会将此电子邮件发送到安倍晋三的官邸。

第一部分我希望每个国家的政府都采取行动。
我每天都寄给我,所以有很多外国人来了解我。
显然,我,中国的金刚阁以及菲律宾使馆官员和外交官都是无辜的。
根据许多《移民法》第70条受到惩罚的外国人无罪。
在日本,根据第31条“法律下的政府”,
除非您根据《国会》中已制定的法律,否则您不会被“逮捕或拘禁”或“惩罚”。

但是,许多日本人不了解宪法或法律。
甚至律师也不知道。
他们假装知道。
他们使谎言的“法律解释”“极为正常”。

日本政府不动。日本政党也不动。日本议员也不动。
日本媒体也不动。我给许多机构寄了信。
参议院主席,众议院主席,最高法院大法官,国家交易委员会主席,起诉审查委员会...
您在哪里对我说:“我应该在哪里上诉?”

1868年,“明治革命”通过引入西方文化使日本成为大国。
因此,日本人很容易受到外国压力。
这个国家特别容易受到大国的“压力”。
日本的民族特色使“他人的不幸”似乎是“蜂蜜的味道”而感到高兴。
请移动日本政府。
这不是“干涉内政”。
这是为了保护每个国家的“民族人民”。
最后是“请帮助我”。

继续下周。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下,只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说,自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书(日语)”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 (日语和英语翻译)
1)《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2)刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3)日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人,
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”,那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面,《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到(促进非法就业的罪恶)的惩罚。
但是,日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人,而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”,那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《移民法》第70条对刑法“罪犯支持其他犯罪”的第60条和第62条“适用”
这是“错误的法律适用”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上,《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束(第70条,第74-6条)。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人,工作场所,律师,
在第192国会制定了修订后的《移民控制法》,该法律适用于行政干事和学校职员等行政人员。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我,KinGungaku,菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100%“无辜的”。

“参考”:外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了(通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份)中规定的行为。
但是,对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此,《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是,被国家权力“压垮”是“衰老,局限性统计”的“停止”。
材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
世界上有许多受害者。
最好的问候。长野康广

PS:白宫有这个问题。
我回答说,我正在认真考虑一个令人满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。


长野康广



请询问最高领导人金正恩(*)


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的,所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是,英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天,联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


要移动世界,您需要
“核导弹”或“巨额资金”。
依附于核导弹的金正恩先生的想法似乎是正确的。
中文单词。
“没有人民的信任,就没有政府”。
请让朝鲜公民“重要”。


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问,请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


Help me!Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-11-15: Sehr geehrter Herr, Das Weiße Haus sagte, dass "wir ernsthaft über dieses Problem nachdenken". Amerikaner sollten Präsident Trump nicht "unterstützen", der den Amerikanern

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-11-15: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Das Weiße Haus sagte, dass "wir ernsthaft über dieses Problem nachdenken". Amerikaner sollten Präsident Trump nicht "unterstützen", der den Amerikanern nicht hilft. Es gab eine Anfrage der chinesischen Botschaft: „Ich möchte hören, was ich für die Chinesen tue.“ Die philippinische Regierung sollte ebenfalls umziehen. Viele Länder mit Opfern sollten ebenfalls umziehen. Natürlich sende ich diese E-Mail jeden Tag an Abes offiziellen Wohnsitz.

Teil 1. Ich erwarte, dass die Regierungen jedes Landes umziehen.
Ich sende es jeden Tag, so viele Ausländer haben mich verstanden.
Offensichtlich sind ich, der chinesische Kingungaku und die philippinischen Botschaftsbeamten und Diplomaten unschuldig.
Ausländer, die gemäß den Artikeln 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes bestraft wurden, sind nicht schuldig.
In Japan gilt gemäß Artikel 31 „Regierung nach dem Gesetz“
Sie werden nicht "verhaftet oder eingesperrt" oder "bestraft", es sei denn, Sie richten sich nach dem Gesetz, das im Landtag "erlassen" wurde.

Viele Japaner kennen jedoch weder die Verfassung noch das Gesetz.
Sogar Anwälte wissen es nicht.
Sie geben vor, es zu wissen.
Sie machen die „Auslegung des Gesetzes“ von Lügen „extrem normal“.

Die japanische Regierung bewegt sich nicht. Auch japanische Parteien bewegen sich nicht. Auch japanische Parlamentarier bewegen sich nicht.
Auch japanische Medien bewegen sich nicht. Ich habe Briefe an viele Institutionen geschickt.
Vorsitzender des Hauses der Ratsmitglieder, Vorsitzender des Repräsentantenhauses, Richter am Obersten Gerichtshof, Vorsitzender der Nationalen Börsenkommission, Staatsanwaltschaftskommission ...
Wo sagst du zu mir: "Wo soll ich appellieren?"

Im Jahr 1868 machte die „Meiji-Revolution“ Japan zu einer Großmacht, indem sie die westliche Kultur importierte.
Die Japaner sind also dem Druck von außen ausgesetzt.
Es ist ein Land, das besonders anfällig für den „Druck“ großer Länder ist.
Der nationale Charakter Japans freut sich, dass "das Unglück anderer" "der Geschmack von Honig" zu sein scheint.
Bitte bewegen Sie die japanische Regierung.
Dies ist keine „Einmischung in innere Angelegenheiten“.
Dies dient dem Schutz der „Nationalbevölkerung“ eines jeden Landes.
Und zum Schluss "Bitte hilf mir".

Weiter zur nächsten Woche.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Und die „bewusste“ und unter Verletzung des einzigen Ausländers im internationalen Recht, das die „Bestrafung“ verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
"Angewandte" Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs "Sünder, die andere Verbrechen unterstützen" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "falsches Gesetz anzuwenden".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es war nicht mit Strafe (alten Gesetz Artikel 70, Artikel 74 6).
Diejenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz, das für Verwaltungsbeamte wie Verwaltungsbeamte und Schulpersonal gilt, wurde auf dem 192. Landtag verabschiedet.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für die Straftat“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes ist für Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes nicht ursächlich.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
"Etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht ist jedoch "Stopp" des "Alterns, Statistik der Einschränkungen".
Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus hat dieses Problem.
Ich antwortete, dass ich ernsthaft eine zufriedenstellende Lösung erwäge.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

 Nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns für alle Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp




Help me!mmanuel Macron au président français 2019-11-15: Monsieur, La Maison Blanche a déclaré "nous examinons sérieusement" cette question. L

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-11-15: Monsieur,
La Maison Blanche a déclaré "nous examinons sérieusement" cette question. Les Américains ne devraient pas "soutenir" le président Trump qui n'aide pas les Américains. L'ambassade de Chine a demandé à l'enquête: «Je veux savoir ce que je fais pour les Chinois». Le gouvernement philippin devrait également bouger. De nombreux pays victimes devraient également déménager. Bien sûr, je continue d'envoyer chaque jour ce courrier électronique à la résidence officielle d'Abe.

Partie 1 Je m'attends à ce que les gouvernements de chaque pays bougent.
Je l'envoie tous les jours, alors beaucoup d'étrangers sont venus me comprendre.
De toute évidence, le Kingungaku chinois et les fonctionnaires et diplomates de l'ambassade des Philippines sont innocents.
Les étrangers sanctionnés en vertu de nombreux articles de la loi sur l'immigration (article 70) ne sont pas coupables.
Au Japon, conformément à l’article 31 «Le gouvernement en droit»,
Vous ne serez ni "arrêté, ni confiné" ni "puni" sauf si vous êtes conforme à la loi "promulguée" par la Diète.

Cependant, beaucoup de Japonais ne connaissent ni la constitution ni la loi.
Même les avocats ne savent pas.
Ils prétendent savoir.
Ils rendent «l'interprétation de la loi» du mensonge «extrêmement normale».

Le gouvernement japonais ne bouge pas. Les partis politiques japonais ne bougent pas non plus. Les parlementaires japonais ne bougent pas non plus.
Les médias japonais ne bougent pas non plus. J'ai envoyé des lettres à de nombreuses institutions.
Président de la Chambre des conseillers, Président de la Chambre des représentants, Juge à la Cour suprême, Président de la Commission des échanges nationaux, Bureau du conseil de poursuite ...
Où me dites-vous: «Où devrais-je faire appel?

En 1868, la «révolution Meiji» a fait du Japon une puissance majeure en important la culture occidentale.
Les Japonais sont donc vulnérables aux pressions étrangères.
C’est un pays particulièrement vulnérable aux «pressions» des grands pays.
Le caractère national du Japon se réjouit que "le malheur des autres" semble être "le goût du miel".
S'il vous plaît déplacer le gouvernement japonais.
Ce n'est pas une "ingérence dans les affaires intérieures".
Cela vise à protéger le «peuple national» de chaque pays.
Et enfin "Aide-moi s'il te plaît".

Continuez jusqu'à la semaine prochaine.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
«Révisé le 4 novembre 2019»
Je ne suis pas seulement chinois et philippin,
Se battre pour de nombreuses victimes dans le monde.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).
Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Cela est clairement contraire à l’article 14 «Principes d’égalité juridique» de la Constitution japonaise.
Il enfreint le droit international qui interdit "consciemment" de "punir" uniquement les étrangers.
Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent". .

2 La poursuite est due à "l'appui de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration"
«Appliqué» aux articles 60 et 62 du code pénal «Les pécheurs soutenant d'autres crimes» contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "une mauvaise loi à appliquer".
"L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration" concerne les personnes qui ont obtenu le statut de résident par le biais d'une fausse demande.
:::::
Traditionnellement, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'appliquait à ceux qui avaient obtenu le statut de résident par de fausses demandes.
Il n'était pas soumis à une réglementation pénale (article 70, article 74-6).
Ceux qui ont obtenu le statut de résidence par une demande de falsification, le lieu de travail, un avocat,
La loi révisée sur le contrôle de l'immigration, qui s'applique aux agents administratifs tels que les administrateurs et le personnel des écoles, a été mise en place à la 192ème diète.
«En vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2017».
:::::
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin et employé de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis à 100% "innocent".

"Référence": loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le procureur est "écraser quelque chose dans sa main".
Cependant, "écraser quelque chose dans la main" par le pouvoir de l'État est un "arrêt" de "vieillissement, statistiques de limitations".
Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche a ce problème.
J'ai répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution satisfaisante.
J'attends le résultat J'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mensonge.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



Help me! To President Trump There was an inquiry from the Chinese embassy saying, “I want to hear what I am doing for the Chinese”. The Philippine government should also move. Many countries with victims should also move. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day. 2019-11-15: Dear Sir,

To President Trump


2019-11-15: Dear Sir,
The White House said "we are seriously considering" this issue. Americans should not "support" President Trump who does not help the Americans. There was an inquiry from the Chinese embassy saying, “I want to hear what I am doing for the Chinese”. The Philippine government should also move. Many countries with victims should also move. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. I expect the governments of each country to move.
I am sending it every day, so many foreigners have come to understand me.
Obviously I, the Chinese Kingungaku, and the Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are innocent.
Foreigners who have been punished under many Immigration Act Articles 70 are not guilty.
In Japan, according to Article 31 “Government under the Law”,
no one will be “arrested or confined” or “punished” unless
they are subject to the law “established” in the Diet.

However, many Japanese do not know the constitution or the law.
Even lawyers don't know.
They pretend to know.
They make the “interpretation of the law” of lies “extremely normal”.

The Japanese government does not move. Japanese political parties don't move either.
Japanese parliamentarians don't move either.
Japanese media don't move either. I sent letters to many institutions.
Chairman of the House of Councilors, Chairman of the House of Representatives,
Supreme Court Justice, Chairman of the National Exchange Commission, Prosecution Review Board ...
Where do you say to me, “Where should I appeal?”

In 1868, the “Meiji Revolution” made Japan a major power by importing Western culture.
So the Japanese are vulnerable to foreign pressure.
It is a country that is particularly vulnerable to “pressure” from large countries.
The national character of Japan rejoices that "the misfortune
of others" seems to be "the taste of honey".
Please move the Japanese government.
This is not “interference in domestic affairs”.
This is to protect the “national people” of each country.
And finally "Please help me".

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano



My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp






Help me!To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-15: Dear Sir, The White House said "we are seriously considering" this issue. Americans should not "support" President Trump who does not help the Americans. There was an

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-11-15: Dear Sir,
The White House said "we are seriously considering" this issue. Americans should not "support" President Trump who does not help the Americans. There was an inquiry from the Chinese embassy saying, “I want to hear what I am doing for the Chinese”. The Philippine government should also move. Many countries with victims should also move. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. I expect the governments of each country to move.
I am sending it every day, so many foreigners have come to understand me.
Obviously I, the Chinese Kingungaku, and the Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are innocent.
Foreigners who have been punished under many Immigration Act Articles 70 are not guilty.
In Japan, according to Article 31 “Government under the Law”,
no one will be “arrested or confined” or “punished” unless
they are subject to the law “established” in the Diet.

However, many Japanese do not know the constitution or the law.
Even lawyers don't know.
They pretend to know.
They make the “interpretation of the law” of lies “extremely normal”.

The Japanese government does not move. Japanese political parties don't move either.
Japanese parliamentarians don't move either.
Japanese media don't move either. I sent letters to many institutions.
Chairman of the House of Councilors, Chairman of the House of Representatives,
Supreme Court Justice, Chairman of the National Exchange Commission, Prosecution Review Board ...
Where do you say to me, “Where should I appeal?”

In 1868, the “Meiji Revolution” made Japan a major power by importing Western culture.
So the Japanese are vulnerable to foreign pressure.
It is a country that is particularly vulnerable to “pressure” from large countries.
The national character of Japan rejoices that "the misfortune
of others" seems to be "the taste of honey".
Please move the Japanese government.
This is not “interference in domestic affairs”.
This is to protect the “national people” of each country.
And finally "Please help me".

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano



It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!To everyone in the world's media  2019-11-15: Dear Sir, The White House said "we are seriously considering" this issue. Americans should not "support" President Trump who does not help the Americans. There was an

To everyone in the world's media 


2019-11-15: Dear Sir,
The White House said "we are seriously considering" this issue. Americans should not "support" President Trump who does not help the Americans. There was an inquiry from the Chinese embassy saying, “I want to hear what I am doing for the Chinese”. The Philippine government should also move. Many countries with victims should also move. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. I expect the governments of each country to move.
I am sending it every day, so many foreigners have come to understand me.
Obviously I, the Chinese Kingungaku, and the Philippine embassy officials and diplomats are innocent.
Foreigners who have been punished under many Immigration Act Articles 70 are not guilty.
In Japan, according to Article 31 “Government under the Law”,
no one will be “arrested or confined” or “punished” unless
they are subject to the law “established” in the Diet.

However, many Japanese do not know the constitution or the law.
Even lawyers don't know.
They pretend to know.
They make the “interpretation of the law” of lies “extremely normal”.

The Japanese government does not move. Japanese political parties don't move either.
Japanese parliamentarians don't move either.
Japanese media don't move either. I sent letters to many institutions.
Chairman of the House of Councilors, Chairman of the House of Representatives,
Supreme Court Justice, Chairman of the National Exchange Commission, Prosecution Review Board ...
Where do you say to me, “Where should I appeal?”

In 1868, the “Meiji Revolution” made Japan a major power by importing Western culture.
So the Japanese are vulnerable to foreign pressure.
It is a country that is particularly vulnerable to “pressure” from large countries.
The national character of Japan rejoices that "the misfortune
of others" seems to be "the taste of honey".
Please move the Japanese government.
This is not “interference in domestic affairs”.
This is to protect the “national people” of each country.
And finally "Please help me".

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



11/14/2019

Help me! 朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩 2019-11-14:亲爱的先生, 我提起“指责”和“指责”的“移民案件违法案件”非常恶毒。中国政府和菲律宾政府应为“我与中国和菲律宾”要求“恢复光荣”和“赔偿”。当然,您也应该要求“其他受害者”。当然,我每天都会将此电子邮件发送到安倍晋三的官邸。

朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩


2019-11-14:亲爱的先生,
我提起“指责”和“指责”的“移民案件违法案件”非常恶毒。中国政府和菲律宾政府应为“我与中国和菲律宾”要求“恢复光荣”和“赔偿”。当然,您也应该要求“其他受害者”。当然,我每天都会将此电子邮件发送到安倍晋三的官邸。


第一部分尽管知道2010年7月的移民法修正案不能惩罚,
检察官对违反《移民法第70条》的人进行处罚,但不对雇用外国人的违反《移民法第73-2条》的人进行处罚。
不仅如此,那些与违反《移民管制法》第70条无关的人也受到了惩罚。
原因是“提供”《移民法》第22-4-4条所述的虚假文件,
我们用“第60条和第62条”惩罚了我们。
利益相关者应被定罪。

“常规”是指在《移民管制法》中将第70条规定为“居留身份以外的劳工”的外国人已被“处以刑罚”和“流放”。
但是,在这种情况下,根据《移民控制法》第70条从事“不合格劳动”的外国人将被判“有期徒刑”。
这种“惩罚”上的区别明显违反了第十四条“法律上的平等”

我不是违反《移民法》第70条并且没有惩罚雇主的外国人。
我认为,即使是“罚款处罚”也违反了《宪法》第14条“法律之下的平等”。
“罚款”也是一种刑事措施。

这就是警察和检察官所说的“向他人展示”和“惩罚”。
我自觉受到了惩罚。
他们告诉我。
“您应该在“一般理论”中承认“犯罪”。
这个词说明了一切。
第31条“依法宪法”不存在。

他们对中国政府“敌视”。
我认为他们对菲律宾政府怀有“敌意”。

中菲两国政府应要求日本政府严惩。
当然,美国政府也应该要求日本政府惩罚涉嫌“非法惩罚”的人。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下,仅通过查看此“起诉书”,您就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说,自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书(日语)”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 (日语和英语翻译)
1)《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2)刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3)日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人,
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”,那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面,《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到(促进非法就业的罪恶)的惩罚。
但是,日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人,而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”,那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
相对于《移民控制法》第60和62条,《移民控制法》的“支持第60和62条的刑法”的“适用”是“适用法律中的错误”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上,《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束(第70条,第74-6条)。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人,工作场所,律师,
在第192国会制定了修订后的《移民控制法》,该法律适用于行政干事和学校职员等行政人员。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我,KinGungaku,菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100%“无辜的”。

“参考”:外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了(通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份)中规定的行为。
但是,对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此,《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是,被国家权力“压垮”是“衰老,局限性统计”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

PS:白宫回答我,我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。


长野康广


请询问最高领导人金正恩(*)


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的,所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是,英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天,联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


要移动世界,您需要
“核导弹”或“巨额资金”。
依附于核导弹的金正恩先生的想法似乎是正确的。
中文单词。
“没有人民的信任,就没有政府”。
请让朝鲜公民“重要”。


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问,请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


Help me!To President Trump 2019-11-14: Dear Sir,The prosecution punishes violators of the "Immigration Act Article 70" but does not punish violators of the "Immigration Act Article 73-2" hiring foreigners, knowing that it cannot be punished by the July 2010 Immigration Control Amendment .

To President Trump
2019-11-14: Dear Sir,
The “Immigration Case Violation Case” in which I have filed “accuse” and “accuse” is extremely vicious. The Chinese government and the Philippine government should claim the "recovery of honor" and "compensation" for "I and the Chinese and the Philippine". Naturally, you should also claim for "other victims". Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. The prosecution punishes violators of the "Immigration Act Article 70"
but does not punish violators of the "Immigration Act Article 73-2" hiring foreigners,
knowing that it cannot be punished by the July 2010 Immigration Control Amendment .
Not only that, but those who have nothing to do with the violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act were punished.
It punished us under “Articles 60 and 62” for “reason”
for “providing” false documents described in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
Stakeholders should be criminalized.

“Conventional” means that foreigners
who have made Article 70 “Labor outside the status of residence”
in the Immigration Control Law have been “punishment” and “exiled”.
However, in this case, foreigners who did “unqualified labor”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act were sentenced to “punishment for imprisonment”.
This difference in “punishment” clearly violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law”

I would violate Article 14 “Equality under the Law” even to make foreigners
who “worked outside of the status of residence”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law “punishment of fines”
without penalizing employers think.
"Fine punishment" is also a criminal measure.

This is what the police officers and prosecutors said (MISESIME) "show them to others" and "punish".
I am consciously punished.
They told me.
“You should admit“ crime ”in“ general theory ”.
This word speaks everything.
Article 31 “Constitution under the Law” does not exist.

They were “hostile” to the Chinese government.
I think they had “hostility” in the Philippine government.

The Chinese and Philippine governments should demand strict punishment from the Japanese government.
Of course, the US government should also request the Japanese government to punish
those involved for “illegal punishment”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed
out by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop” of “aging,
statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



Help me!Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-11-14: Monsieur, Le «cas d'infraction en matière d'immigration» dans lequel j'ai déposé les accusations et les accusations est extrêmement vicieux. Les gouvernements


Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-11-14: Monsieur,
Le «cas d'infraction en matière d'immigration» dans lequel j'ai déposé les accusations et les accusations est extrêmement vicieux. Les gouvernements chinois et philippin devraient réclamer la "récupération de l'honneur" et la "réparation" de "Moi et les Chinois et les Philippines". Naturellement, vous devriez également réclamer pour "d'autres victimes". Bien sûr, je continue d'envoyer chaque jour ce courrier électronique à la résidence officielle d'Abe.


Partie 1 Tout en sachant que la modification de la loi sur l'immigration de juillet 2010 ne pourrait pas punir,
Les procureurs punissent les contrevenants à l '"article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration", mais pas ceux qui "embauchent des étrangers".
Non seulement cela, mais ceux qui n'ont rien à voir avec la violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration ont été punis.
La raison en est de "fournir" de faux documents décrits dans l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration,
Nous nous avons punis avec "les articles 60 et 62".
Les parties prenantes devraient être criminalisées.

Le terme «conventionnel» signifie que les étrangers qui ont inclus l’article 70 «Travail hors statut de résident» dans la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration ont été «punis» et «exilés».
Cependant, dans ce cas, les étrangers qui ont effectué un «travail non qualifié» en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration ont été condamnés à une "peine d'emprisonnement".
Cette différence de "punition" viole clairement l'article 14 "Égalité devant la loi"

Je ne suis pas un étranger qui a violé l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration et n’a pas puni l’employeur.
Je pense que même la «peine d'amende» viole l'article 14 «Égalité devant la loi» de la Constitution.
"Amende punition" est également une mesure pénale.

C’est ce que les policiers et les procureurs ont déclaré (MISESIME) "leur montrer à d’autres" et "punir".
Je suis consciemment puni.
Ils m'ont dit
“Vous devriez admettre“ crime ”dans“ théorie générale ”.
Ce mot parle tout.
L’article 31 «Constitution de la loi» n’existe pas.

Ils étaient «hostiles» au gouvernement chinois.
Je pense qu'ils ont eu «hostilité» dans le gouvernement des Philippines.

Les gouvernements chinois et philippin devraient exiger des sanctions sévères de la part du gouvernement japonais.
Bien entendu, le gouvernement américain devrait également demander au gouvernement japonais de punir les personnes impliquées pour «punition illégale».

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce «acte d’accusation» pour comprendre «l’erreur de la loi applicable».

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Voir «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
«Révisé le 4 novembre 2019»
Je ne suis pas seulement chinois et philippin,
Se battre pour de nombreuses victimes dans le monde.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).
Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Cela est clairement contraire à l’article 14 «Principes d’égalité juridique» de la Constitution japonaise.
Il enfreint le droit international qui interdit "consciemment" de "punir" uniquement les étrangers.
Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent". .

2 La poursuite est due à "l'appui de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration"
"Applicable" à "Droit pénal relatif aux articles 60 et 62" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration à l'encontre "des articles 60 et 62 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration" est une "erreur de droit applicable".
"L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration" concerne les personnes qui ont obtenu le statut de résident par le biais d'une fausse demande.
:::::
Traditionnellement, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'appliquait à ceux qui avaient obtenu le statut de résident par de fausses demandes.
Il n'était pas soumis à une réglementation pénale (article 70, article 74-6).
Ceux qui ont obtenu le statut de résidence par une demande de falsification, le lieu de travail, un avocat,
La nouvelle loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, qui s'applique aux agents administratifs tels que les administrateurs et le personnel des écoles, a été mise en place à la 192ème diète.
«En vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2017».
:::::
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin et employé de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis à 100% "innocent".

"Référence": loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le procureur est "écraser quelque chose dans sa main".
Cependant, "écraser quelque chose dans sa main" avec le pouvoir de l'État est un "arrêt" de "vieillissement, statistiques de limitations".

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat J'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mensonge.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp








Help me! Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-11-14: Sehr geehrter Herr, Der "Immigration Case Violation Case", in dem ich "Anklage" und "Anklage" eingereicht habe, ist äußerst bösartig. Die chinesische Regierung und die


Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-11-14: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Der "Immigration Case Violation Case", in dem ich "Anklage" und "Anklage" eingereicht habe, ist äußerst bösartig. Die chinesische Regierung und die philippinische Regierung sollten die "Wiedererlangung der Ehre" und "Entschädigung" für "Ich und die Chinesen und die Philippinen" fordern. Natürlich sollten Sie auch "andere Opfer" fordern. Natürlich sende ich diese E-Mail jeden Tag an Abes offiziellen Wohnsitz.


Teil 1. In dem Wissen, dass die Novelle des Einwanderungsgesetzes im Juli 2010 nicht bestraft werden konnte,
Staatsanwälte bestrafen Verstöße gegen "Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 70", nicht jedoch Verstöße gegen "Einwanderungsgesetz Artikel 73-2", die Ausländer eingestellt haben.
Nicht nur das, sondern auch diejenigen, die nichts mit der Verletzung von Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes zu tun haben, wurden bestraft.
Der Grund ist, falsche Dokumente, die im Einwanderungsgesetz, Artikel 22-4-4, beschrieben sind, bereitzustellen.
Wir haben uns mit "Artikel 60 und 62" bestraft.
Stakeholder sollten kriminalisiert werden.

"Konventionell" bedeutet, dass Ausländer, die Artikel 70 "Arbeit außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus" im Einwanderungskontrollgesetz festgelegt haben, "bestraft" und "verbannt" wurden.
In diesem Fall wurden jedoch Ausländer, die nach Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes „unqualifizierte Arbeit“ verrichteten, zu „Freiheitsstrafe“ verurteilt.
Dieser Unterschied in der „Bestrafung“ verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz“.

Ich bin kein Ausländer, der gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstößt und den Arbeitgeber nicht bestraft hat.
Ich denke, dass sogar die „Bestrafung von Geldbußen“ gegen Artikel 14 „Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz“ der Verfassung verstößt.
"Feine Strafe" ist auch eine kriminelle Maßnahme.

Dies ist, was die Polizeibeamten und Staatsanwälte sagten (MISESIME) "zeigen sie anderen" und "bestrafen".
Ich werde bewusst bestraft.
Sie sagten es mir.
"Sie sollten" Verbrechen "in" allgemeine Theorie "zugeben.
Dieses Wort spricht alles.
Artikel 31 „Verfassung nach dem Gesetz“ existiert nicht.

Sie waren der chinesischen Regierung "feindlich" gesinnt.
Ich denke, sie hatten "Feindseligkeiten" in der philippinischen Regierung.

Die chinesische und die philippinische Regierung sollten von der japanischen Regierung eine strenge Bestrafung verlangen.
Natürlich sollte die US-Regierung auch die japanische Regierung auffordern, die Beteiligten für "illegale Bestrafung" zu bestrafen.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "bewusste" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
"Anwendbar" auf "Strafrecht zur Unterstützung von Artikel 60 und 62" des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes gegen "Artikel 60 und 62 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes" ist "Fehler im anwendbaren Recht".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es unterlag keinen strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen (Artikel 70, Artikel 74-6).
Diejenigen, die den Status des Wohnsitzes durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz, das für Verwaltungsbeamte wie Verwaltungsbeamte und Schulpersonal gilt, wurde auf dem 192. Landtag verabschiedet.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
"Etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht ist jedoch "Stopp" des "Alterns, Statistik der Einschränkungen".

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Viele Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


Help me! To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-14: Dear Sir, the "recovery of honor" and "compensation" for "I and the Chinese and the Philippine". Naturally, you should also claim for "other victims". Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-11-14: Dear Sir,
The “Immigration Case Violation Case” in which I have filed “accuse” and “accuse” is extremely vicious. The Chinese government and the Philippine government should claim the "recovery of honor" and "compensation" for "I and the Chinese and the Philippine". Naturally, you should also claim for "other victims". Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. The prosecution punishes violators of the "Immigration Act Article 70"
but does not punish violators of the "Immigration Act Article 73-2" hiring foreigners,
knowing that it cannot be punished by the July 2010 Immigration Control Amendment .
Not only that, but those who have nothing to do with the violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act were punished.
It punished us under “Articles 60 and 62” for “reason”
for “providing” false documents described in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
Stakeholders should be criminalized.

“Conventional” means that foreigners
who have made Article 70 “Labor outside the status of residence”
in the Immigration Control Law have been “punishment” and “exiled”.
However, in this case, foreigners who did “unqualified labor”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act were sentenced to “punishment for imprisonment”.
This difference in “punishment” clearly violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law”

I would violate Article 14 “Equality under the Law” even to make foreigners
who “worked outside of the status of residence”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law “punishment of fines”
without penalizing employers think.
"Fine punishment" is also a criminal measure.

This is what the police officers and prosecutors said (MISESIME) "show them to others" and "punish".
I am consciously punished.
They told me.
“You should admit“ crime ”in“ general theory ”.
This word speaks everything.
Article 31 “Constitution under the Law” does not exist.

They were “hostile” to the Chinese government.
I think they had “hostility” in the Philippine government.

The Chinese and Philippine governments should demand strict punishment from the Japanese government.
Of course, the US government should also request the Japanese government to punish
those involved for “illegal punishment”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed
out by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop” of “aging,
statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To everyone in the world's media  2019-11-14: Dear Sir, The “Immigration Case Violation Case” in which I have filed “accuse” and “accuse” is extremely vicious. The Chinese government and the Philippine government

To everyone in the world's media 


2019-11-14: Dear Sir,
The “Immigration Case Violation Case” in which I have filed “accuse” and “accuse” is extremely vicious. The Chinese government and the Philippine government should claim the "recovery of honor" and "compensation" for "I and the Chinese and the Philippine". Naturally, you should also claim for "other victims". Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. The prosecution punishes violators of the "Immigration Act Article 70"
but does not punish violators of the "Immigration Act Article 73-2" hiring foreigners,
knowing that it cannot be punished by the July 2010 Immigration Control Amendment .
Not only that, but those who have nothing to do with the violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act were punished.
It punished us under “Articles 60 and 62” for “reason”
for “providing” false documents described in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
Stakeholders should be criminalized.

“Conventional” means that foreigners
who have made Article 70 “Labor outside the status of residence”
in the Immigration Control Law have been “punishment” and “exiled”.
However, in this case, foreigners who did “unqualified labor”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act were sentenced to “punishment for imprisonment”.
This difference in “punishment” clearly violates Article 14 “Equality under the Law”

I would violate Article 14 “Equality under the Law” even to make foreigners
who “worked outside of the status of residence”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law “punishment of fines”
without penalizing employers think.
"Fine punishment" is also a criminal measure.

This is what the police officers and prosecutors said (MISESIME) "show them to others" and "punish".
I am consciously punished.
They told me.
“You should admit“ crime ”in“ general theory ”.
This word speaks everything.
Article 31 “Constitution under the Law” does not exist.

They were “hostile” to the Chinese government.
I think they had “hostility” in the Philippine government.

The Chinese and Philippine governments should demand strict punishment from the Japanese government.
Of course, the US government should also request the Japanese government to punish
those involved for “illegal punishment”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed
out by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop” of “aging,
statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

11/13/2019

Help me! 朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩 2019-11-13:亲爱的先生, 在2017年1月之前受到惩罚的人是无辜的,包括我在内,都是无罪的指控。以前,《移民控

朝鲜民主主义人民共和国最高领导人金正恩


2019-11-13:亲爱的先生,
在2017年1月之前受到惩罚的人是无辜的,包括我在内,都是无罪的指控。以前,《移民控制法》不对通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人处以罚款。经修订的《移民控制法》是在第192次特别饮食会议上制定的,适用于通过伪造申请获得居留身份或协助他们的人。当然,我每天都会将此电子邮件发送到安倍晋三的官邸。

第一部分“支持者”“向外国人提供”“虚假文件”,
外国人获得“居民身份”。
那个外国人在《移民法》第70条“居住身份以外的劳工”中工作。
“支持者”的行为是第22-4-4条“提供虚假文件”及其“支持行为”。

检察官因此而非法惩罚“支持者”。
刑事名称将《刑法》第60条和第62条作为《移民管制法》第70条的“支持者”。

但是,在2017年1月之前,“签发人”这一行为是“无辜的”。

在2017年1月制定的《移民控制法》的修订版中,纯真被写为“意图”。

传统上,《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束(第70条,第74-6条)。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人,工作场所,律师,
在第192国会制定了修订后的《移民控制法》,该法律适用于行政干事和学校职员等行政人员。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。

在我知道这项法律之后,没有人反对我的主张。

在我制定这项法律之前,我一直在解释以下“法律逻辑”。
起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《移民法》第70条对刑法“罪犯支持其他犯罪”的第60条和第62条“适用”
这是“错误的法律适用”。

外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了(通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份)中规定的行为。
但是,对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫遣返”。
因此,《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
《起诉书,起诉书》指出《移民法》第22-4-4条
“刑事原因”与《移民控制法》第70条没有“因果关系”。

“我,KinGungaku,菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100%“无辜的”。 *
这是一名警官,检察官,法官。
涉案的警官,检察官和法官应受到严惩。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下,仅通过查看此“起诉书”,您就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说,自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书(日语)”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 (日语和英语翻译)
1)《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2)刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3)日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人,
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”,那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面,《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到(促进非法就业的罪恶)的惩罚。
但是,日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人,而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”,那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《移民法》第70条对刑法“罪犯支持其他犯罪”的第60条和第62条“适用”
这是“错误的法律适用”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上,《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束(第70条,第74-6条)。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人,工作场所,律师,
在第192国会制定了修订后的《移民控制法》,该法律适用于行政干事和学校职员等行政人员。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我,KinGungaku,菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100%“无辜的”。

“参考”:外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了(通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份)中规定的行为。
但是,对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此,《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是,被国家权力“压碎某人的手”是
“老化,限制统计”中的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

PS:白宫回答我,我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。


长野康广


请询问最高领导人金正恩(*)


日本政府宣布“横田惠”的“骨骼”是假的。
因为这个“骨头”是假的,所以我不相信朝鲜所说的任何话。
这就是为什么我坚持要返回“被绑架者”的原因。
但是,英国科学杂志《自然》提出了有关DNA测试的问题。
今天,联合国和唐纳德·特朗普总统是日本政府的盟友。
朝鲜应基于“自然”问题进行反驳。
请遵循以下信息。
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


要移动世界,您需要
“核导弹”或“巨额资金”。
依附于核导弹的金正恩先生的想法似乎是正确的。
中文单词。
“没有人民的信任,就没有政府”。
请让朝鲜公民“重要”。


我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


请帮帮我
如有任何疑问,请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp




Help me! To President TrumpA “supporter” “provided” a “false document” to a foreigner, and the foreigner received a “resident status”. And that foreigner worked in the Immigration Act Article 70 “Labor outside the status of residence”.

Help me!

To President Trump


2019-11-13: Dear Sir,
Those who were punished before January 2017 are innocent, including me, false accusation. Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those who obtained status of residence through false applications. The revised Immigration Control Law was established at the 192th Extraordinary Diet session for those who have obtained status of residence through falsification applications or who have assisted them. Of course, I keep sending this email to Abe's official residence every day.


Part 1. A “supporter” “provided” a “false document” to a foreigner,
and the foreigner received a “resident status”.
And that foreigner worked in the Immigration Act Article 70 “Labor outside the status of residence”.
The act of “supporter” is Article 22-4-4 “Provision of false documents”
and its “supporting act”.


Prosecutors illegally punished “supporters” for this reason.
Criminal name applied Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code as “Supporter”
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

However, before January 2017, this act of “the person who issued” is “innocent”.

The innocence is written as “intent” in a revision of the Immigration Control Act
that was constructed in January 2017.

Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.

After I knew this law, no one argued against my claim.

Until I was able to make this law, I was explaining the following "logic of law".
The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
The disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced repatriation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by “Indictment, bill of indictment” is not “causal” with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".
This is a crime of police officers, prosecutors and judges.
Police officers, prosecutors and judges involved in the case should be severely punished.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes that support other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano



My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

2025-01-23:من المرجح أن يكون عام 2025 هو العام الذي سيتم فيه وضع المركبات الهيدروجينية بالكامل في الاستخدام العملي. وسوف تتحرر أوروبا أخيرًا من "تلوث الهواء" الناجم عن "المركبات الكهربائية".

 2025-01-23: إصدار الأسبوع. سيارات الهيدروجين الإيطالية "مذهلة". ستظهر "شركة سيارات هيدروجينية" ستتفوق على "تسلا...