中华人民共和国 习近平 国家主席 2019-12-10：亲爱的先生， 假设一个中国人或菲律宾人“附加”了“虚假文件”并获得了“居民身份”。但是，如果他们在“居民身份”的范围内工作，则不会违反《移民控制法》第70条。违反《移民法》第70条与《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“支持行为”（提供虚假文件）之间没有“因果关

中华人民共和国　习近平　国家主席


2019-12-10：亲爱的先生，
假设一个中国人或菲律宾人“附加”了“虚假文件”并获得了“居民身份”。但是，如果他们在“居民身份”的范围内工作，则不会违反《移民控制法》第70条。违反《移民法》第70条与《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“支持行为”（提供虚假文件）之间没有“因果关系”。许多人同意我的主张。但是检方仍然不赞成。


第一部分从2017年1月起“修订”的《移民控制法》证明了我的要求的正确性。
2016年11月18日，在第192届特别饮食
同月28日颁布并颁布了《修订移民和难民识别法》。

已确立“护理”居住的新身份（于2017年9月1日生效）。
另一个要点是近年来“伪装”成为问题
这是因为针对“滞留者”的措施和处罚得到了加强。
签署毕业证书或就业合同等
近年来，在其他地方的非法活动数量有所增加。

 有关修订的详细信息，请参见下面的“第2部分”。
“我们已通过立法立法惩罚提供虚假文件的人”

我还与“我的律师”讨论了第22-4-4条“提供虚假文件”。
然后律师说：
“您的逻辑是程序理论。”
“说程序论没有意义”。

我想换律师。
但是，犯罪嫌疑人已被“逮捕和关押”。
犯罪嫌疑人被“拘留”，甚至无法“找到”新的“律师”。
这就是“人质司法系统”，是日本“司法系统”的特征。
警察说。
“您应该在“一般理论”中承认自己的罪过”。
他们通过“一般理论”而非法律来定义犯罪。

检察官说。
“你相信谁？”
当然，许多日本人不相信我。
许多日本人喜欢“别人的不幸就像蜂蜜一样”。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人，
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。
但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《刑法》“支持其他罪行的罪人”“适用”第70条和第70条
这是“错误的法律适用”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上，《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束（第70条，第74-6条）。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人，工作场所，律师，
修订后的《移民控制法》，对行政代理人和学校职员等申请代理人的处罚
它是在第192次特别饮食会议上建立的。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100％“无辜的”。

“参考”：外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是，被国家权力“压垮”是“衰老，局限性统计”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

PS：白宫回答我，我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。

如果文档Web的URL如下所示，请发送电子邮件。 （返回一个私有URL）。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

长野康广


*以下是发送给中国驻东京大使馆的电子邮件的内容


我不仅每天向日本，而且也向国际社会发送。
日本需要外国工人。
但是，除非解决了这个问题，否则外国工人不会来。
此外，公司不能安心雇用外国人。
请认真考虑这个问题。

中国政府应保护因违反《 2010年移民法》而受到非法惩罚的中国人。
我正在与日本政府斗争，以帮助“贫穷的中国人”。
人们不仅仅是华为的首席财务官！
习近平主席应该采取“人权穷人”的照顾。
你应该抗议日本政府。
您应该要求恢复荣誉和``赔偿''！
否则，在中国人民革命是必要的。

对华为首席财务官的非法逮捕抗议了加拿大政府。
然后，采取了对策。
然而，对于2010年的受害人“ Kin gungaku”，
100％非法逮捕，但未对日本政府提出抗议

“ Kin Gungaku” =金成研究。
他最初是延边的职业足球运动员。
他的父亲是延边共产党领导人。
中国政府是否放弃了强大的爱国主义共产主义者的家庭？

因违反《移民管制法》第70条而受到惩罚的四人为“汗”。
“非法劳动”不能仅由中国人来完成。
雇主非法雇用他们。
雇主不受《移民法》第73-2条的处罚。
他有意识地只惩罚了中国人。这违反了国际法。


当其中一名中国人被捕时，
我老婆给我打电话。
她说：“请帮助我的丈夫”。
我告诉我妻子
“您应立即与中国大使馆联系并说明情况。” “我很快就会被释放。”
然后妻子说。
“中国政府不会提供帮助。”
我以为，“大使馆成员”正在“坠入”日本政府的“蜜罐”。


如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


如有任何疑问，请联系我们！
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-12-10: Dear Sir, There is no "causal relationship" between violation of the Immigration Act Article 70 and "supporting act" (providing false documents) in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4. Many agree with my claim. But the prosecution still does not approve.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-12-10: Dear Sir,
Suppose a Chinese or Philippine person has “attached” a “false document” and obtained a “resident status”. However, they do not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of “Resident Status”. There is no "causal relationship" between violation of the Immigration Act Article 70 and "supporting act" (providing false documents) in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4. Many agree with my claim. But the prosecution still does not approve.


Part 1. The correctness of my claim is proved by the revised Immigration Control Act
that was "constructed" from January 2017.
November 18, 2016, in the first 192 times extraordinary session "Act
for Partial Revision of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act" is established,
has been promulgated in the same month 28 days.

A new status of residence for "nursing care" has been established (enforced on September 1, 2017).
Another important point is that in recent years,
measures and penalties have been strengthened, such as “disguised” “stayers”,
which have become a problem.
In recent years, there has been an increasing problem of fraudulent graduation certificates,
employment contracts, etc., fraudulently obtaining a status of residence
or disappearing from the place of training, and working illegally elsewhere.

 Please see “Part 2” below for details of the revision.
"We have legislated legislation to punish the person who provided the false document"

I also talked to "My Lawyer" about Article 22-4-4 "Provision of False Documents".
Then the lawyer says:
"Your logic is procedural theory."
“There is no“ meaning ”to say procedural theory.”

I wanted to change my lawyer.
However, the suspect has been “arrested and confined”.
The suspect is “detained” and cannot even “find” a new “lawyer”.
This is the “hostage justice system”, which is a characteristic
of the “judicial system” in Japan.
The police officer says.
“You should admit your sin in the“ general theory ””.
They define crime by "general theory" rather than by law.

The prosecutor says.
"Who do you believe in what you say?"
Certainly, many Japanese did not believe me.
Many Japanese people enjoy that “the misfortune of others tastes like honey”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan
and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials
and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled
by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government
for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim
for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty",
the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left
on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To President Trump 2019-12-10: Dear Sir, Suppose a Chinese or Philippine person has “attached” a “false document” and obtained a “resident status”. However, they do not violate Article 70 of the

To President Trump


2019-12-10: Dear Sir,
Suppose a Chinese or Philippine person has “attached” a “false document” and obtained a “resident status”. However, they do not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of “Resident Status”. There is no "causal relationship" between violation of the Immigration Act Article 70 and "supporting act" (providing false documents) in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4. Many agree with my claim. But the prosecution still does not approve.


Part 1. The correctness of my claim is proved by the revised Immigration Control Act
that was "constructed" from January 2017.
November 18, 2016, in the first 192 times extraordinary session "Act
for Partial Revision of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act" is established,
has been promulgated in the same month 28 days.

A new status of residence for "nursing care" has been established (enforced on September 1, 2017).
Another important point is that in recent years,
measures and penalties have been strengthened, such as “disguised” “stayers”,
which have become a problem.
In recent years, there has been an increasing problem of fraudulent graduation certificates,
employment contracts, etc., fraudulently obtaining a status of residence
or disappearing from the place of training, and working illegally elsewhere.

 Please see “Part 2” below for details of the revision.
"We have legislated legislation to punish the person who provided the false document"

I also talked to "My Lawyer" about Article 22-4-4 "Provision of False Documents".
Then the lawyer says:
"Your logic is procedural theory."
“There is no“ meaning ”to say procedural theory.”

I wanted to change my lawyer.
However, the suspect has been “arrested and confined”.
The suspect is “detained” and cannot even “find” a new “lawyer”.
This is the “hostage justice system”, which is a characteristic
of the “judicial system” in Japan.
The police officer says.
“You should admit your sin in the“ general theory ””.
They define crime by "general theory" rather than by law.

The prosecutor says.
"Who do you believe in what you say?"
Certainly, many Japanese did not believe me.
Many Japanese people enjoy that “the misfortune of others tastes like honey”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-12-10: Monsieur, Supposons qu'une personne chinoise ou philippine ait “attaché” un “faux document” et obtenu un “statut de résident”. Cependant, ils ne violent pas l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'ils travaillent dans le

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-12-10: Monsieur,
Supposons qu'une personne chinoise ou philippine ait “attaché” un “faux document” et obtenu un “statut de résident”. Cependant, ils ne violent pas l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'ils travaillent dans le cadre du «statut de résident». Il n'y a pas de "lien de causalité" entre la violation de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration et "l'acte d'accompagnement" (fourniture de faux documents) dans l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration. Beaucoup sont d'accord avec ma demande. Mais la poursuite n'approuve toujours pas.


Partie 1 La validité de ma demande est prouvée par la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration révisée qui a été "construite" à partir de janvier 2017.
18 novembre 2016, à la 192ème diète spéciale
La «loi portant révision de la loi sur l'immigration et la reconnaissance des réfugiés» a été promulguée et promulguée le 28 du même mois.

Un nouveau statut de résidence pour les "soins infirmiers" a été mis en place (entré en vigueur le 1er septembre 2017).
Un autre point important est le "déguisement" qui est devenu un problème ces dernières années
En effet, les mesures et les sanctions applicables aux «restants» ont été renforcées.
Forger un certificat de diplôme ou un contrat de travail, etc.
Ces dernières années, le nombre d'activités illégales dans d'autres lieux a augmenté.

 Veuillez consulter la «Partie 2» ci-dessous pour plus de détails sur la révision.
"Nous avons légiféré pour punir la personne qui a fourni le faux document"

J'ai également parlé à "Mon avocat" de l'article 22-4-4 "Fourniture de faux documents".
Puis l'avocat dit:
"Votre logique est la théorie procédurale."
"Il n'y a pas de" sens "pour dire théorie procédurale."

Je voulais changer d'avocat.
Cependant, le suspect a été «arrêté et emprisonné».
Le suspect est «détenu» et ne peut même pas «trouver» un nouvel «avocat».
C'est le «système de justice en otage», caractéristique du «système judiciaire» au Japon.
Le policier dit.
"Vous devriez admettre votre péché dans la" théorie générale "".
Ils définissent le crime par "théorie générale" plutôt que par loi.

Le procureur dit.
"Qui crois-tu en ce que tu dis?"
Certes, beaucoup de Japonais ne m'ont pas cru.
Beaucoup de Japonais apprécient le fait que «le malheur des autres a le goût du miel».

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
«Révisé le 4 novembre 2019»
Je ne suis pas seulement chinois et philippin,
Se battre pour de nombreuses victimes dans le monde.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).
Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Cela est clairement contraire à l’article 14 «Principes d’égalité juridique» de la Constitution japonaise.
Il enfreint le droit international qui interdit "consciemment" de "punir" uniquement les étrangers.
Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent". .

2 La poursuite est due à "l'appui de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration"
“Appliqué” articles 60 et 62 du code pénal “Les pécheurs pour soutenir d'autres crimes” contre la loi sur l'immigration Article 70
C'est "une mauvaise loi à appliquer".
"L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration" concerne les personnes qui ont obtenu le statut de résident par le biais d'une fausse demande.
:::::
Traditionnellement, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'appliquait à ceux qui avaient obtenu le statut de résident par de fausses demandes.
Il n'était pas soumis à une réglementation pénale (article 70, article 74-6).
Ceux qui ont obtenu le statut de résidence par une demande de falsification, le lieu de travail, un avocat,
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration révisée prévoyant des sanctions pour les agents d'application tels que les administrateurs et le personnel des écoles
Il a été créé à la 192ème session de la Diète extraordinaire.
«En vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2017».
:::::
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin et employé de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis à 100% "innocent".

"Référence": loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le procureur est "écraser quelque chose dans sa main".
Cependant, "écraser quelque chose dans sa main" avec le pouvoir de l'État est un "arrêt" de "vieillissement, statistiques de limitations".

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat J'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mensonge.

Veuillez envoyer un e-mail si l'URL du document Web est comme indiqué ci-dessous. (Retourne une URL privée).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano



Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-12-10: Sehr geehrter Herr, Angenommen, eine chinesische oder philippinische Person hat ein „falsches Dokument“ „angehängt“ und einen „Aufenthaltsstatus“ erhalten. Sie verstoßen jedoch nicht gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes, w

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-12-10: Sehr geehrter Herr,
Angenommen, eine chinesische oder philippinische Person hat ein „falsches Dokument“ „angehängt“ und einen „Aufenthaltsstatus“ erhalten. Sie verstoßen jedoch nicht gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes, wenn sie im Rahmen des „Aufenthaltsstatus“ arbeiten. Es gibt keinen "Kausalzusammenhang" zwischen dem Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes und dem "Unterstützungsgesetz" (das falsche Dokumente vorsieht) in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes. Viele stimmen meinem Anspruch zu. Aber die Anklage stimmt immer noch nicht zu.


Teil 1. Die Richtigkeit meiner Behauptung wird durch das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz bewiesen, das ab Januar 2017 "gebaut" wurde.
18. November 2016, bei der 192. Sonderdiät
Das „Gesetz zur Revision des Gesetzes über die Einwanderung und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen“ wurde am 28. desselben Monats erlassen und verkündet.

Ein neuer Aufenthaltsstatus für "Pflege" wurde festgelegt (Vollstreckung am 1. September 2017).
Ein weiterer wichtiger Punkt ist die „Verkleidung“, die in den letzten Jahren zum Problem geworden ist
Dies ist darauf zurückzuführen, dass Maßnahmen und Strafen für „Steher“ verschärft wurden.
Fälschen Sie eine Abschlussurkunde, einen Arbeitsvertrag usw.
In den letzten Jahren hat die Anzahl illegaler Aktivitäten an anderen Orten zugenommen.

 Einzelheiten zur Überarbeitung finden Sie unter „Teil 2“.
"Wir haben Gesetze erlassen, um die Person zu bestrafen, die das falsche Dokument zur Verfügung gestellt hat"

Ich habe auch mit "Mein Anwalt" über Artikel 22-4-4 "Bereitstellung falscher Dokumente" gesprochen.
Dann sagt der Anwalt:
"Ihre Logik ist prozedurale Theorie."
"Es gibt keine" Bedeutung ", um prozedurale Theorie zu sagen."

Ich wollte meinen Anwalt wechseln.
Der Verdächtige wurde jedoch „festgenommen und eingesperrt“.
Der Verdächtige ist "eingesperrt" und kann nicht einmal einen neuen "Anwalt" "finden".
Dies ist das "Geiseljustizsystem", das für das "Justizsystem" in Japan charakteristisch ist.
Der Polizist sagt.
"Sie sollten Ihre Sünde in der" allgemeinen Theorie "zugeben".
Sie definieren Kriminalität eher durch "allgemeine Theorie" als durch Gesetz.

Der Staatsanwalt sagt.
"An wen glauben Sie, was Sie sagen?"
Sicherlich haben mir viele Japaner nicht geglaubt.
Viele Japaner genießen, dass "das Unglück anderer wie Honig schmeckt".

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "bewusste" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
"Angewandte" Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs "Sünder, die andere Verbrechen unterstützen" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "falsches Gesetz anzuwenden".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es unterlag keinen strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen (Artikel 70, Artikel 74-6).
Diejenigen, die den Status des Wohnsitzes durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz sieht Strafen für Antragsteller wie Beamte und Schulpersonal vor
Es wurde an der 192. außerordentlichen Diät-Sitzung hergestellt.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
"Etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht ist jedoch "Stopp" des "Alterns, Statistik der Einschränkungen".

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.

Bitte senden Sie eine E-Mail, wenn die URL des Dokumentwebs wie unten gezeigt ist. (Geben Sie eine private URL zurück.)
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano



Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-12-10: Dear Sir, Suppose a Chinese or Philippine person has “attached” a “false document” and obtained a “resident status”. However, they do not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of “Resident Status”. There is no "causal relationship" between violation of the Immigration Act Article 70 and "supporting act" (providing false documents) in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4. Many agree with my claim. But the prosecution still does not approve.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-12-10: Dear Sir,
Suppose a Chinese or Philippine person has “attached” a “false document” and obtained a “resident status”. However, they do not violate Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act if they work within the scope of “Resident Status”. There is no "causal relationship" between violation of the Immigration Act Article 70 and "supporting act" (providing false documents) in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4. Many agree with my claim. But the prosecution still does not approve.


Part 1. The correctness of my claim is proved by the revised Immigration Control Act
that was "constructed" from January 2017.
November 18, 2016, in the first 192 times extraordinary session "Act
for Partial Revision of the Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act" is established,
has been promulgated in the same month 28 days.

A new status of residence for "nursing care" has been established (enforced on September 1, 2017).
Another important point is that in recent years,
measures and penalties have been strengthened, such as “disguised” “stayers”,
which have become a problem.
In recent years, there has been an increasing problem of fraudulent graduation certificates,
employment contracts, etc., fraudulently obtaining a status of residence
or disappearing from the place of training, and working illegally elsewhere.

 Please see “Part 2” below for details of the revision.
"We have legislated legislation to punish the person who provided the false document"

I also talked to "My Lawyer" about Article 22-4-4 "Provision of False Documents".
Then the lawyer says:
"Your logic is procedural theory."
“There is no“ meaning ”to say procedural theory.”

I wanted to change my lawyer.
However, the suspect has been “arrested and confined”.
The suspect is “detained” and cannot even “find” a new “lawyer”.
This is the “hostage justice system”, which is a characteristic
of the “judicial system” in Japan.
The police officer says.
“You should admit your sin in the“ general theory ””.
They define crime by "general theory" rather than by law.

The prosecutor says.
"Who do you believe in what you say?"
Certainly, many Japanese did not believe me.
Many Japanese people enjoy that “the misfortune of others tastes like honey”.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”.
Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue. I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 김정은 최고 지도자 2019-12-09 : 인사말, 2010 년 6 월 "중국과 나 '그리고 2014 년'필리핀 대사관 직원이나 외교관 '은'허위 고용 계약서」를 「재류 자격 신청자"로 "제공"했다. 그 이유로 우리는 "형법 60 조 및 62 조"로

조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 김정은 최고 지도자


2019-12-09 : 인사말,
2010 년 6 월 "중국과 나 '그리고 2014 년'필리핀 대사관 직원이나 외교관 '은'허위 고용 계약서」를 「재류 자격 신청자"로 "제공"했다. 그 이유로 우리는 "형법 60 조 및 62 조"로 처벌 되었으나 명확하게 "원죄, False charge"입니다. 이것은 2017 년 1 월부터 시공 된 개정 입관 법이 입증하고 있습니다. 일본 검찰은 아직도 죄를 인정하지 않는다. 중국 정부와 필리핀 정부는 '명예 회복'와 배상을 일본 정부에 요구해야한다!


제 1 부. 필리핀 대사관의 경우는 2010 년의 "우리의 케이스」라고 완전히 동일합니다.
중국인과 필리핀 인은 "허위의 고용 계약 서류"를 "제출"하고 재류 자격을 얻었다.
그리고 그들은 재류 자격을 얻었다.
그리고 그들은 재류 자격 이외의 노동을했다.
그들은 입관 법 70 조에서 처벌 "노동의 형"되었다.
그리고 "허위 서류"를 "제공"한 "외교관 등"은 "형법 60 조 및 62 조"에서 "노동의 형 '이됐다.

"허위 서류"를 제출하고 「재류 자격, visa status "를 얻은 경우, 입관 법 22-4-4 조 위반입니다.
이 경우 법무부 장관은 행정 처분으로서 「재류 자격, visa status "를 취소하겠습니다.
그리고 그들은 강제로 추방입니다.
따라서이란 "허위 서류"를 제공했다 "저와 중국인 Kingungaku」나 「필리핀 대사관 직원이나 외교관 '을
"형법 60 조 및 62 조"로 처벌 할 수 없습니다.

"저와 중국인 Kingungaku"의 "기소, bill of indictment"다음 "내용"입니다.

1) 중국인이 입관 법 70 조의 「재류 자격 외 노동 '을 한 사실.
2) '나'가 '내용이 허위 고용 계약서 "를 작성한 사실.
3) "중국인 KinGungaku"중국인 그것을 "제공"사실.
4) 중국인이 "내용이 허위 고용 계약서"를 "첨부"하고 "재류 자격 변경"의 신청을 한 사실.


주 1) 상기의 구성에서 중국인 4 명을 순서대로 기재하고 있습니다.
"기소, bill of indictment"에 기재되어 있지 않지만 중국인은 「재류 자격」을 얻었습니다.
그리고 그들은 "기소, bill of indictment"맨 위에있는 입관 법 70 조 위반 낫습니다.

주 2) 나는 진실 중국인을 고용하는 '고용 계약'을 수여했습니다.
2008 년에 '리먼 쇼크'가 발생했습니다.
그래서 주식의 공개를 준비중인 'L 사'는 중국인의 채용을 중단했습니다.
하지만이 '고용 계약'이 '진정한'이든 또는 '거짓'인지는 다툼 없습니다.
왜냐하면, 만일 "내용이 허위 고용 계약서」에도 범죄가 아니기 때문입니다.
근거는 일본 국 헌법 31 조, 그리고 입관 법 22-4-4 조입니다.

내일 계속됩니다.

아래의 "사이트"에서 "bill of indictment"를 참조하십시오.
이 사건이 "bill of indictment"을 본 것만으로, 당신은 "적용 법률의 오류"를 이해할 수 있습니다.

"영문 번역」과 「일본어 원문 'PDF 파일을 참조하십시오.
개인 정보의 취급에 충분히주의를하십시오.
● 영문 번역 "기소 letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
영문 번역은 참고입니다. 정확하게는 각자해야합니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● 일본어 원문 '기소 letter of indictment "
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
영문 번역은 잘못된 것입니다. 영문 번역은 위의 "PDF"를 참조하십시오.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● 관련 법률을 참조하십시오. (일본어 및 영문 번역)
1) 出入国管理及び難民認定法
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) 형법
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) 일본 국 헌법
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

제 2 부. 나는 두 가지를 "호소"있습니다.
"2019 년 11 월 4 일 개정"
나는뿐만 아니라 중국이나 필리핀 사람뿐만 아니라
세계의 많은 희생자를 위해 싸우고 있습니다.
사건에서 10 년 가까이됩니다. 내 생명에는 한계가 있습니다.
세계가 "법에 따라 통치 '를 무시한다면 테러로 해결하는 것은 당연합니다.

1. 외국인이 「재류 자격」이외의 「불법 노동 '을 실시했다. 그러나 외국인은 무죄입니다.
외국인 만 입관 법 70 조 "불법 노동의 죄 '로 처벌되었습니다.
이에 대해 입관 법은 불법 노동의 '인과 관계'인 고용주를 입관 법 73-2 조
(불법 취업을 조장 한 죄)로 처벌하고 있습니다.
그러나 일본의 사법은 외국인 만 "처벌"했지만 "고용주"을 "처벌"하지 않습니다.
이것은 분명히 일본 국 헌법 14 조 '법 아래 평등의 원칙'에 위배됩니다.
그리고 '의식'에 외국인 만 "처벌"하는 것을 금지 한 국제법을 위반하고 있습니다.
불법으로 외국인을 고용 한 고용주가 "무죄"이면 불법으로 일하게 된 외국인도 '무죄'입니다. .

2. 검찰은 "입관 법 22-4-4 조 지원"을 이유로
입관 법 70 조에 대하여 형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄"를 "적용"했지만 "적용 법률의 오류"입니다.
"입관 법 22-4-4 조"는 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 사람의 처분입니다.
::::
기존 입관 법은 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자에 대하여
처벌의 대상이 없습니다 (구법 70 조, 74 조의 6).
허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자이를 방조한 회사, 변호사,
행정 서사 및 교직원 등의 신청 대행 사람을 처벌 대상으로 한 개정 입관 법 제 192 회 임시 국회에서 성립했습니다.
"2017 년 1 월 1 일부터 시행"되어 있습니다.
::::
"나, KinGungaku, 필리핀 국가의 외교관, 필리핀 대사관 직원"100 % "무죄"입니다.

"참고": 외국인이 입국 관리법 22-4-4 조
(허위 서류를 제출하는 것에 의한 status of residence의 취득)에 규정하는 행위를했다.
그러나 이에 대한 "형사 처벌"은 없습니다.
처분은 법무부 장관의 'status of residence 취소'와 '국외 강제 퇴거 "입니다.
따라서 「형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄 '가 적용되지 않습니다.
"기소"가 지적하는 입관 법 22-4-4 조의 '범죄의 이유'는 입관 법 70 조 및 인과 관계가 없다.

검찰은 "고소장, bill of indictment"을 "握りつぶす, crush something in one 's hand"하고 있습니다.
그러나 국가 권력에 의한 "crush something in one 's hand '는'시효, statute of limitations"의 "정지"입니다.

자료는 아래에 있습니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

피해자는 세계에 많이 있습니다.
감사합니다. Yasuhiro Nagano

추신 : White House는이 문제에서 내가 만족하는 해결책을 진지하게 검토하고 나는 대답했습니다.
나는 결과를 기다리고 있습니다. "거짓말이 없다"것을 기대하고 있습니다.

자료의 Web URL을 아래 표시하면 메일을 주시기 바랍니다. (비공개 URL을 회신합니다).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/


나가노 恭博



최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한의 말은 모두 믿을 수 없다.
그래서 '납북자'를 기인한다고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 아래에서 걷고 있습니다.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


세계를 움직이려면 중 하나가 필요합니다
"핵 미사일"또는 "거액의 돈"입니다.
"핵 미사일"에 집착하는 '김정은 각하'의 생각은 옳은 것 같습니다.
중국 말입니다.
"Without the trust of the people, there can be no government"
북한의 국민을 "중요한"합니다.


내 정보 

우편 번호 2610-0003
주소 Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
이름 YasuhiroNagano 나가노 恭博
휴대 전화
이메일


도와주세요.
불명 한 점은 문의 해주십시오.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

中华人民共和国 习近平 国家主席 2019-12-09：亲爱的先生， 2010年6月的“我和我”和2014年的“菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官”向“具有居留身份的申请人”提供了“虚假雇佣合同”。因此，我们受到“第60条和第62条”的惩罚，但显然是“虚假指

中华人民共和国　习近平　国家主席


2019-12-09：亲爱的先生，
2010年6月的“我和我”和2014年的“菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官”向“具有居留身份的申请人”提供了“虚假雇佣合同”。因此，我们受到“第60条和第62条”的惩罚，但显然是“虚假指控”。修订后的《移民控制法》于2017年1月制定，证明了这一点。日本检察官仍然不承认自己的罪行。中菲两国政府应要求日本政府``恢复光荣''并给予赔偿！


第一部分菲律宾大使馆的案件与2010年的“我们的案件”完全相同。
中国人和菲律宾人通过“提交”“虚假的雇佣合同文件”获得居留身份。
他们获得了居留身份。
他们除了居住身份以外还从事其他工作。
根据《移民法》第70条，他们被处以“惩罚劳动”。
根据《刑法》第60和62条，“提供”“虚假文件”的“外交官等”成为“工作处罚”。

如果您提交“虚假文件”并获得“签证身份”，则违反了《移民法》第22-4-4条。
在这种情况下，司法部长将取消“居民身份，签证身份”作为一项行政措施。
他们被迫出局。
因此，提供“虚假文件”的“我和中国金刚阁”和“菲律宾大使馆官员和外交官”
它不受“《刑法》第60和62条”的惩罚。

“我和中国金殿阁”的“起诉书”是以下“内容”。

1）根据《移民管制法》第70条，中国人从事“居留身份以外的工作”。
2）“我”创建了“内容虚假的劳动合同”。
3）“金国阁”向中国人“提供”这一事实。
（4）中国人以“附有虚假劳动合同”的形式申请“居住身份变更”。


注1）在上述配置中，按顺序列出了四种中文。
尽管未在“起诉书，起诉书”中列出，但中国人已获得“居民身份”。
然后，他们违反了起诉书开头所列的《移民控制法》第70条。

注2）我实际上发布了《雇佣协议》来雇用中国人。
2008年，发生了“雷曼冲击”。
因此，准备上市的“ L公司”已停止雇用中国人。
但是，我对此“雇佣合同”是“真”还是“假”毫不怀疑。
这是因为即使它是“虚假的雇用合同”，也不是刑事犯罪。
理由是《日本宪法》第31条和《移民管制法》第22-4-4条。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，仅通过查看此“起诉书”，您就可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人，
为世界上的许多受害者而战。
自事件发生至今已近10年。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。
但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
相对于《移民控制法》第60和62条，《移民控制法》的“支持第60和62条的刑法”的“适用”是“适用法律中的错误”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上，《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束（第70条，第74-6条）。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人，工作场所，律师，
在第192国会制定了修订后的《移民控制法》，该法律适用于行政干事和学校职员等行政人员。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100％“无辜的”。

“参考”：外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是，被国家权力“压垮”是“衰老，局限性统计”的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。
最好的问候。长野康广

PS：白宫回答我，我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果我希望没有谎言。

如果文档Web的URL如下所示，请发送电子邮件。 （返回一个私有URL）。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/


长野康广



*以下是发送给中国驻东京大使馆的电子邮件的内容


我不仅每天向日本，而且也向国际社会发送。
日本需要外国工人。
但是，除非解决了这个问题，否则外国工人不会来。
此外，公司不能安心雇用外国人。
请认真考虑这个问题。

中国政府应保护因违反《 2010年移民法》而受到非法惩罚的中国人。
我正在与日本政府斗争，以帮助“贫穷的中国人”。
人们不仅仅是华为的首席财务官！
习近平主席应该采取“人权穷人”的照顾。
你应该抗议日本政府。
您应该要求恢复荣誉和``赔偿''！
否则，在中国人民革命是必要的。

对华为首席财务官的非法逮捕抗议了加拿大政府。
然后，采取了对策。
然而，对于2010年的受害人“ Kin gungaku”，
100％非法逮捕，但未对日本政府提出抗议

“ Kin Gungaku” =金成研究。
他最初是延边的职业足球运动员。
他的父亲是延边共产党领导人。
中国政府是否放弃了强大的爱国主义共产主义者的家庭？

因违反《移民管制法》第70条而受到惩罚的四人为“汗”。
“非法劳动”不能仅由中国人来完成。
雇主非法雇用他们。
雇主不受《移民法》第73-2条的处罚。
他有意识地只惩罚了中国人。这违反了国际法。


当一名中国人被捕时，
我老婆给我打电话。
她说：“请帮助我的丈夫”。
我告诉我妻子
“您应立即与中国大使馆联系并说明情况。” “我很快就会被释放。”
然后妻子说。
“中国政府不会提供帮助。”
我以为，“大使馆成员”正在“坠入”日本政府的“蜜罐”。


如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


如有任何疑问，请联系我们！
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



*

To President Trump 2019-12-09: Dear Sir, “Chinese and I” in June 2010 and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” in 2014 “provided” “false employment contracts” to “applicants for residence status”. For that reason, we were punished under “Articles 60 and 62” but are clearly

To President Trump


2019-12-09: Dear Sir,
“Chinese and I” in June 2010 and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” in 2014 “provided” “false employment contracts” to “applicants for residence status”. For that reason, we were punished under “Articles 60 and 62” but are clearly “False charges”. This is proved by the revised Immigration Control Law, which was constructed in January 2017. Japanese prosecutors still do not admit their sins. The Chinese and Philippine governments should ask the Japanese government for `` recovery of honor '' and compensation!


Part 1. The case of the Philippine Embassy is exactly the same as the “our case” in 2010.
Chinese and Filipinos gained their status of residence
by “submitting” “false employment contract documents”.
And they got a status of residence.
And they did work other than the status of residence.
They were punished “punishment of labor” under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
“Diplomats etc.” who “provided” “false documents” became “work punishment”
under “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code”.

If you submit a “false document” and obtain a “visa status”,
it is a violation of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
In this case, the Minister of Justice will cancel the “Resident Status,
visa status” as an administrative measure. And they are forced out.
Therefore, it is not possible to punish "I and Chinese Kingungaku"
or "Philippine embassy officials or diplomats" who provided "false documents"
under "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code".

The “Bill of indictment” of “I and Chinese Kingungaku” is the following “contents”.

1) The fact that the Chinese performed “work outside the status of residence”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The fact that “I” created an “employment contract with false content”.
3) The fact that “KinGungaku” “provided” it to the Chinese.
4) The fact that the Chinese applied for “change of status of residence”
with “attachment” of “false employment contract”.


Note 1) In the above configuration, the four Chinese are listed in order.
Although it is not listed in the “Indictment, bill of indictment”,
the Chinese have obtained “Resident status”.
They then violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act listed at the beginning
of the bill of indictment.

Note 2) I actually issued an “Employment Contract” to hire Chinese people.
In 2008, the “Lehman Shock” occurred.
So “Company L”, which is preparing to go public, has stopped hiring Chinese people.
However, I don't dispute whether this "Employment Contract" is "true" or "false".
This is because it is not a criminal offense even if it is a “false employment contract”.
The grounds are Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution and Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”. Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62
of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop” of “aging,
statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano




My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-12-09: Monsieur, «Chinese and I» en juin 2010 et «des fonctionnaires et diplomates de l'ambassade des Philippines» en 2014 «ont fourni» de «faux contrats de travail» aux

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-12-09: Monsieur,
«Chinese and I» en juin 2010 et «des fonctionnaires et diplomates de l'ambassade des Philippines» en 2014 «ont fourni» de «faux contrats de travail» aux «demandeurs du statut de résident». Pour cette raison, nous avons été punis en vertu des «articles 60 et 62», mais il s'agit clairement de «fausses accusations». Ceci est prouvé par la loi révisée sur le contrôle de l'immigration, qui a été construite en janvier 2017. Les procureurs japonais n'admettent toujours pas leurs péchés. Les gouvernements chinois et philippin devraient demander au gouvernement japonais une "récupération d'honneur" et une indemnisation!


Partie 1 Le cas de l'ambassade des Philippines est exactement le même que celui de «notre cas» en 2010.
Les Chinois et les Philippins ont obtenu leur statut de résidence en «soumettant» de «faux documents de contrat de travail».
Et ils ont un statut de résidence.
Et ils ont travaillé autre que le statut de résidence.
Ils ont été punis de «peine de travail» en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Les «diplomates, etc.» qui ont «fourni» de «faux documents» sont devenus une «peine de travail» en vertu des «articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal».

Si vous soumettez un «faux document» et obtenez un «statut de visa», il s'agit d'une violation de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration.
Dans ce cas, le ministre de la Justice annulera le «statut de résident, statut de visa» en tant que mesure administrative.
Et ils sont forcés de sortir.
Par conséquent, "Moi et le chinois Kingungaku" et les "diplomates et ambassades des Philippines" qui ont fourni de "faux documents".
Il ne peut être puni par les «articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal».

Le «Acte d'accusation» de «Moi et le Kingungaku chinois» est le «contenu» suivant.

1) Le fait que les Chinois effectuent un «travail hors du statut de résident» en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
2) Le fait que «je» ait créé un «contrat de travail avec un contenu faux».
3) Le fait que «KinGungaku» l’ait «fourni» aux Chinois.
4) Le fait que les Chinois ont demandé le «changement de statut de résidence» avec «saisie» de «faux contrat de travail».


Note 1) Dans la configuration ci-dessus, les quatre Chinois sont listés dans l'ordre.
Bien que cela ne figure pas dans «Acte d'accusation, acte d'accusation», les Chinois ont obtenu le «statut de résident».
Ils ont ensuite enfreint l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration énuméré au début de l'acte d'accusation.

Note 2) J'ai en fait émis un «contrat de travail» pour engager des Chinois.
En 2008, le «choc Lehman» s'est produit.
La «compagnie L», qui se prépare à entrer en bourse, a donc cessé d’embaucher des Chinois.
Cependant, je ne conteste pas que ce "contrat de travail" est "vrai" ou "faux".
En effet, il ne s'agit pas d'une infraction pénale, même s'il s'agit d'un "faux contrat de travail".
Les motifs sont l'article 31 de la Constitution japonaise et l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce «acte d’accusation» pour comprendre «l’erreur de la loi applicable».

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
«Révisé le 4 novembre 2019»
Je ne suis pas seulement chinois et philippin,
Se battre pour de nombreuses victimes dans le monde.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).
Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Cela est clairement contraire à l’article 14 «Principes d’égalité juridique» de la Constitution japonaise.
Il enfreint le droit international qui interdit "consciemment" de "punir" uniquement les étrangers.
Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent". .

2 La poursuite est due à "l'appui de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration"
"Applicable" à "Droit pénal relatif aux articles 60 et 62" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration à l'encontre "des articles 60 et 62 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration" est une "erreur de droit applicable".
"L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration" concerne les personnes qui ont obtenu le statut de résident par le biais d'une fausse demande.
:::::
Traditionnellement, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'appliquait à ceux qui avaient obtenu le statut de résident par de fausses demandes.
Il n'était pas soumis à une réglementation pénale (article 70, article 74-6).
Ceux qui ont obtenu le statut de résidence par une demande de falsification, le lieu de travail, un avocat,
La nouvelle loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, qui s'applique aux agents administratifs tels que les administrateurs et le personnel des écoles, a été mise en place à la 192ème diète.
«En vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2017».
:::::
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin et employé de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis à 100% "innocent".

"Référence": loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» figurant à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le procureur est "écraser quelque chose dans sa main".
Cependant, "écraser quelque chose dans sa main" avec le pouvoir de l'État est un "arrêt" de "vieillissement, statistiques de limitations".

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat J'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mensonge.

Veuillez envoyer un e-mail si l'URL du document Web est comme indiqué ci-dessous. (Retourne une URL privée).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/


Yasuhiro Nagano


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 09.12.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr, "Chinese and I" im Juni 2010 und "Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft" im Jahr 2014 "stellten" "falsche Arbeitsverträge" für "Antragsteller auf

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


09.12.2019: Sehr geehrter Herr,
"Chinese and I" im Juni 2010 und "Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft" im Jahr 2014 "stellten" "falsche Arbeitsverträge" für "Antragsteller auf Aufenthaltsstatus". Aus diesem Grund wurden wir nach den Artikeln 60 und 62 bestraft, aber es handelt sich eindeutig um „falsche Anschuldigungen“. Dies wird durch das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz belegt, das im Januar 2017 errichtet wurde. Die japanischen Staatsanwälte geben ihre Sünden immer noch nicht zu. Die chinesische und die philippinische Regierung sollten die japanische Regierung um "Wiederherstellung der Ehre" und Entschädigung bitten!


Teil 1. Der Fall der philippinischen Botschaft ist genau der gleiche wie der „unser Fall“ im Jahr 2010.
Chinesen und Filipinos erhielten ihren Aufenthaltsstatus, indem sie „falsche Arbeitsvertragsunterlagen“ vorlegten.
Und sie haben einen Aufenthaltsstatus.
Und sie haben andere Arbeiten als den Aufenthaltsstatus ausgeführt.
Sie wurden nach Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes als „Bestrafung der Arbeit“ bestraft.
"Diplomaten usw.", die "falsche Dokumente" "zur Verfügung stellten", wurden nach "Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs" zur "Arbeitsstrafe".

Wenn Sie ein „falsches Dokument“ einreichen und einen „Visastatus“ erhalten, verstößt dies gegen Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
In diesem Fall wird der Justizminister den „Aufenthaltsstatus, Visastatus“ als Verwaltungsmaßnahme aufheben.
Und sie werden rausgezwungen.
Deshalb "Ich und Chinese Kingungaku" und "philippinische Botschaftsbeamte und Diplomaten", die "falsche Dokumente" zur Verfügung stellten
Es kann nicht mit den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs bestraft werden.

Die "Anklageschrift" von "Ich und Chinesisch Kingungaku" ist der folgende "Inhalt".

1) Die Tatsache, dass die Chinesen „Arbeiten außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus“ gemäß Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verrichteten.
2) Die Tatsache, dass "Ich" einen "Arbeitsvertrag mit falschen Inhalten" erstellt hat.
3) Die Tatsache, dass "KinGungaku" es den Chinesen "zur Verfügung stellte".
4) Die Tatsache, dass die Chinesen die „Änderung des Aufenthaltsstatus“ mit der „Pfändung“ eines „falschen Arbeitsvertrags“ beantragten.


Anm. 1) In der obigen Konfiguration sind die vier Chinesen der Reihe nach aufgeführt.
Obwohl es nicht in der "Anklageschrift" aufgeführt ist, haben die Chinesen den "Aufenthaltsstatus" erhalten.
Sie verstießen dann gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes, der zu Beginn der Anklageschrift aufgeführt war.

Anm. 2) Ich habe tatsächlich einen „Arbeitsvertrag“ abgeschlossen, um Chinesen einzustellen.
Im Jahr 2008 ereignete sich der „Lehman-Schock“.
Die Firma L, die sich auf den Börsengang vorbereitet, stellt keine Chinesen mehr ein.
Ich bestreite jedoch nicht, ob dieser "Arbeitsvertrag" "wahr" oder "falsch" ist.
Dies liegt daran, dass es keine Straftat ist, auch wenn es sich um einen „falschen Arbeitsvertrag“ handelt.
Die Gründe sind Artikel 31 der japanischen Verfassung und Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall können Sie, wenn Sie sich diese "Anklageschrift" ansehen, den "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "bewusste" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
"Anwendbar" auf "Strafrecht zur Unterstützung von Artikel 60 und 62" des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes gegen "Artikel 60 und 62 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes" ist "Fehler im anwendbaren Recht".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es unterlag keinen strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen (Artikel 70, Artikel 74-6).
Diejenigen, die den Status des Wohnsitzes durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz, das für Verwaltungsbeamte wie Verwaltungsbeamte und Schulpersonal gilt, wurde auf dem 192. Landtag verabschiedet.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem ursächlichen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
"Etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht ist jedoch "Stopp" des "Alterns, Statistik der Einschränkungen".

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.

Bitte senden Sie eine E-Mail, wenn die URL des Dokumentwebs wie unten gezeigt ist. (Geben Sie eine private URL zurück.)
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/


Yasuhiro Nagano



Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-12-09: Dear Sir, “Chinese and I” in June 2010 and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” in 2014 “provided” “false employment contracts” to “applicants for residence status”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-12-09: Dear Sir,
“Chinese and I” in June 2010 and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” in 2014 “provided” “false employment contracts” to “applicants for residence status”. For that reason, we were punished under “Articles 60 and 62” but are clearly “False charges”. This is proved by the revised Immigration Control Law, which was constructed in January 2017. Japanese prosecutors still do not admit their sins. The Chinese and Philippine governments should ask the Japanese government for `` recovery of honor '' and compensation!


Part 1. The case of the Philippine Embassy is exactly the same as the “our case” in 2010.
Chinese and Filipinos gained their status of residence
by “submitting” “false employment contract documents”.
And they got a status of residence.
And they did work other than the status of residence.
They were punished “punishment of labor” under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
“Diplomats etc.” who “provided” “false documents” became “work punishment”
under “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code”.

If you submit a “false document” and obtain a “visa status”,
it is a violation of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
In this case, the Minister of Justice will cancel the “Resident Status,
visa status” as an administrative measure. And they are forced out.
Therefore, it is not possible to punish "I and Chinese Kingungaku"
or "Philippine embassy officials or diplomats" who provided "false documents"
under "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code".

The “Bill of indictment” of “I and Chinese Kingungaku” is the following “contents”.

1) The fact that the Chinese performed “work outside the status of residence”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The fact that “I” created an “employment contract with false content”.
3) The fact that “KinGungaku” “provided” it to the Chinese.
4) The fact that the Chinese applied for “change of status of residence”
with “attachment” of “false employment contract”.


Note 1) In the above configuration, the four Chinese are listed in order.
Although it is not listed in the “Indictment, bill of indictment”,
the Chinese have obtained “Resident status”.
They then violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act listed at the beginning
of the bill of indictment.

Note 2) I actually issued an “Employment Contract” to hire Chinese people.
In 2008, the “Lehman Shock” occurred.
So “Company L”, which is preparing to go public, has stopped hiring Chinese people.
However, I don't dispute whether this "Employment Contract" is "true" or "false".
This is because it is not a criminal offense even if it is a “false employment contract”.
The grounds are Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution and Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”. Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62
of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop” of “aging,
statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!To everyone in the world's media 2019-12-09: Dear Sir, “Chinese and I” in June 2010 and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” in 2014 “provided” “false employment contracts” to “applicants for residence status”.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-12-09: Dear Sir,
“Chinese and I” in June 2010 and “Philippine embassy officials and diplomats” in 2014 “provided” “false employment contracts” to “applicants for residence status”. For that reason, we were punished under “Articles 60 and 62” but are clearly “False charges”. This is proved by the revised Immigration Control Law, which was constructed in January 2017. Japanese prosecutors still do not admit their sins. The Chinese and Philippine governments should ask the Japanese government for `` recovery of honor '' and compensation!


Part 1. The case of the Philippine Embassy is exactly the same as the “our case” in 2010.
Chinese and Filipinos gained their status of residence
by “submitting” “false employment contract documents”.
And they got a status of residence.
And they did work other than the status of residence.
They were punished “punishment of labor” under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
“Diplomats etc.” who “provided” “false documents” became “work punishment”
under “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code”.

If you submit a “false document” and obtain a “visa status”,
it is a violation of the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4.
In this case, the Minister of Justice will cancel the “Resident Status,
visa status” as an administrative measure. And they are forced out.
Therefore, it is not possible to punish "I and Chinese Kingungaku"
or "Philippine embassy officials or diplomats" who provided "false documents"
under "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code".

The “Bill of indictment” of “I and Chinese Kingungaku” is the following “contents”.

1) The fact that the Chinese performed “work outside the status of residence”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The fact that “I” created an “employment contract with false content”.
3) The fact that “KinGungaku” “provided” it to the Chinese.
4) The fact that the Chinese applied for “change of status of residence”
with “attachment” of “false employment contract”.


Note 1) In the above configuration, the four Chinese are listed in order.
Although it is not listed in the “Indictment, bill of indictment”,
the Chinese have obtained “Resident status”.
They then violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act listed at the beginning
of the bill of indictment.

Note 2) I actually issued an “Employment Contract” to hire Chinese people.
In 2008, the “Lehman Shock” occurred.
So “Company L”, which is preparing to go public, has stopped hiring Chinese people.
However, I don't dispute whether this "Employment Contract" is "true" or "false".
This is because it is not a criminal offense even if it is a “false employment contract”.
The grounds are Article 31 of the Japanese Constitution and Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution applied “applying” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Article 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4”. Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The revised Immigration Control Law was enacted at the 192nd Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60 and 62
of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop” of “aging,
statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Please e-mail if the URL of the document web is as shown below. (Return a private URL).
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Yasuhiro Nagano



Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan
and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials
and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled
by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government
for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim
for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty",
the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left
on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp