To President Trump
At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.
2019-05-29:Dear Sirs, "Angela Merkel, the Prime Minister,"
The concept and system in modern Japanese law is the influence of German law.
However, judicial administration that does not "rule under the law" is not German influence.
This is the same influence of the "Confucian culture" as "China" and "North Korea".
Part 1. It is a "judgment document" of "assistance.
Case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
Again, the "judgment document" will be written in Japanese
in order to be accurately stated.
Everybody, please translate correctly.
第2 因果関係について
各正犯者は,「留学」の資格で在留を許可されていた者で,
卒業後はその資格では在留が許可されないのであるから,
もし,これに代わる何らかの在留資格が得られなければ
日本に引き続き滞在することは許されなかったものである。
すなわち,在留資格を変更して新たな在留資格を得ることにより,
初めて引き続き在留することが可能になったもので,
在留できなければ,本邦で資格外活動を行うことも不可能であつたのは自明である。
そして被告人は内容虚偽の雇用契約書等を交付することによって,
各正犯者が在留資格の変更許可を得ることを容易にしたのであるから,
被告人の行為と各正犯者の資格外活動との間に因果関係があることは明白である。
弁護人の主張は独自の見解というほかないものであり,理由がない。
Organize this "causal relationship" into "itemization".
1) "Chinese" was a "resident" who qualified for "study abroad".
2) "Chinese people" still required "other status of residence" to stay
in Japan after graduation.
3) Chinese people can continue to stay in Japan by changing their status
of residence and acquiring new status of residence.
4) Because Chinese were able to stay in Japan,
it was possible to do "not qualified" activities.
5) Defendant (Nagano) has issued "false documents"
(documents of "employment contract" whose contents are false) to Chinese.
6) Chinese people are more susceptible to “change of status of residence”.
7) Therefore, there is a "causal relationship"
between the defendant's (5) action of "5" and "illegal labor" of each Chinese.
In other words, it is a crime that I "issued" false documents
(a false contract for employment) to Chinese.
"Prosecution letter" written by prosecutors.
The criminal facts of the "judgment" written by the judge are exactly the same.
The judge points out “supporting activities”
under Article 22-4, paragraph 4 of the Immigration Control Act,
and states that this is a crime.
Also, the "subject" of the crime is Article 70 (illegal labor)
of the immigration control law conducted by Chinese.
The "supporting act" of 4 (4) 4 of Article 22
of the Immigration Control Act is referred to as the "supporting act"
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
So apply Article 60 and Article 62 of the Penal Code (sins to support other crimes).
The target is violation of Article 70 of the immigration control law by China.
What is it, what is it?
Prosecutors and judges do not understand the law.
It is "unintelligible" because it tries to be criminalized.
It will continue tomorrow.
Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law",
it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.
1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).
However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".
If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.
2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.
Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.
The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ***************************************************
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
***************************************************
