To the world media

<Public mail> In Japan, prosecutors are given the "monopoly right of indictment". Therefore, the prosecutor ignores criminal charges against the criminal offense of the prosecutor. Please request Japan "governance under the law". Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. As well as us, as far as I can tell, in 2014 and 2015 the officials and diplomats of the Philippine Embassy were applied with criminal charges with "illegitimate sin" with similar illegal logic. My argument is that the application of the "assistance crime" of the criminal law is a criminal act by violation of the applicable law for the following reasons. The offense of police officers, prosecutors, etc. is the crime law's "false charge" and is "a crime of special officials' abuse of their own authority." 1. The act of assisting illegal labor is stipulated in Article 2, Article 73 of the Immigration Act, "Crime that promotes illegal l

<Public mail> In Japan, prosecutors are given the "monopoly right of indictment". Therefore, the prosecutor ignores criminal charges against the criminal offense of the prosecutor. Please request Japan "governance under the law". Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. As well as us, as far as I can tell, in 2014 and 2015 the officials and diplomats of the Philippine Embassy were applied with criminal charges with "illegitimate sin" with similar illegal logic. My argument is that the application of the "assistance crime" of the criminal law is a criminal act by violation of the applicable law for the following reasons. The offense of police officers, prosecutors, etc. is the crime law's "false charge" and is "a crime of special officials' abuse of their own authority." 1. The act of assisting illegal labor is stipulated in Article 2, Article 73 of the Immigration Act, "Crime that promotes illegal l

August 13, 2018 Thank you for taking the time to send me your thoughts and suggestions. Earlier today, I was proud to be at Fort Drum in New York to sign into law H.R. 5515, the “John McCain National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2019.” This important legislation authorizes $717 billion to fund our Nation’s Armed Forces, enhance our military might, and ensure our readiness. No fighting force rivals that of the United States Military. The precious liberties we all enjoy as American citizens are possible because the men and women of our Armed Forces relentlessly and tirelessly carry out their critical mission of defending freedom. I encourage you to watch the signing ceremony from earlier this afternoon. Sincerely, Donald Trump https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/V20180809AH-0443-1200x720.jpg https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-c

The White House • August 13, 2018 The Day Ahead President Donald J. Trump will sign the National Defense Authorization Act for the next fiscal year. Watch live at 2:30 p.m. ET . Rebuilding America’s ‘unmatched power’ Restoring our national security is a core piece of President Trump’s agenda to reinvigorate America. Today, that promise is being kept as the President signs the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2019. The NDAA enhances the President’s ability to help protect the Nation by authorizing $716 billion in funding for defense and military activities. This unprecedented support will help to deter our adversaries and maintain the Trump Administration’s policy of peace through strength. The NDAA also fulfills the President’s request to give our troops a much-deserved pay raise. The NDAA also strengthens our support for allies. In reinforcing our bond wi

<Public mail> President Donald Trump is challenging the rule of law. In Japan, prosecutors are given the "monopoly right of indictment". Therefore, the prosecutor ignores criminal charges against the criminal offense of the prosecutor. Please request Japan "governance under the law". Dear Sirs, I am Japanese. Prosecutors and others conducted a very malicious crime in "assistance case for violation of Immigration Control Act" that occurred in 2010. Normally, those who illegally employed foreigners are not punished under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Crime that promotes illegal labor". Only foreigners who worked illegally were punished (fined) for exclusion outside the country with "sins that worked illegally". Although this method is also a violation of international law, the international community is incompetent to Japanese law, so there was no problem. But in this case, a young prosecutor wanted to

<Öffentliche Post> In Japan erhalten Staatsanwälte das "Monopol der Anklage". Daher Staatsanwälte ignorieren strafrechtliche Anklagen gegen die Staatsanwaltschaft. Bitte fordern Sie Japan "Governance unter dem Gesetz". Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, ich bin Japaner. Staatsanwälte und andere führten ein sehr böswilliges Verbrechen im "Unterstützungsfall für die Verletzung des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes" durch, das 2010 stattfand. Normalerweise werden diejenigen, die illegal Ausländer beschäftigen, nicht nach Artikel 73-2 des Zuwanderungsgesetzes "Verbrechen, das illegale Arbeit fördert" bestraft. Nur Ausländer, die illegal arbeiteten, wurden bestraft (Geldstrafe) für den Ausschluss außerhalb des Landes mit "Sünden, die illegal funktionierte". Obwohl diese Methode auch ein Verstoß gegen das Völkerrecht ist, Weil die internationale Gemeinschaft inkompatibel zu japanischem Recht ist, ist kein Problem aufgetreten.

<Courrier public> Au Japon, les procureurs ont le "droit de mise en accusation". Par conséquent, Les procureurs ignorent les poursuites pénales contre le crime de procureurs. Veuillez demander au Japon "la gouvernance en vertu de la loi". Chers Messieurs, je suis japonais. Les procureurs et d’autres personnes ont commis un crime très malveillant dans le cadre d’une «affaire d’assistance pour violation de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration» survenue en 2010. Normalement, ceux qui ont employé illégalement des étrangers ne sont pas punis en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration "Crimes qui encouragent le travail illégal". Seuls les étrangers qui travaillaient illégalement ont été condamnés (à une amende) pour exclusion en dehors du pays avec "des péchés qui ont fonctionné illégalement". Bien que cette méthode constitue également une violation du droit international, La communauté internationale étant