#MeToo Human rights victim! To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2018-06-14: Japanese shame! The prosecutors pointed out that we assisted "getting a foreigner's status of residence"
<Public mail>
and applied "criminal law, assistance crime" as aiding
in "illegal work outside the status of residence" .
Please laugh at ignorant Japanese judicial administration.
Dear Sirs, I am Japanese.
Prosecutors and others pointed out the reasons for assistance
by the Immigration Act 22-4-4 (False Documents Submission,
Rescission of Status of Residence),
and the offense has applied the crime aid for criminal law against violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act. The logic of law is crazy.
And they still do not accept this mistake.
Four Chinese who occurred in 2010 worked outside the status of residence permission
and were violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act and received criminal penalties.
"Each employer" who worked four Chinese people was not criminalized
for criminal violation of Immigration Act 73-2.
Employers were not even arrested.
Such punishment of international law fraud is a routine occurrence in Japan.
But the prosecutors of this case were more vicious because they wanted "Achievement".
They pointed out the aid acts of Article 22-4-4 (Cancellation of status of residence)
and arrested us for "criminal assistance crime" against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Prosecutors and others for reasons of assistance of Article 22-4-4
of Immigration Control Act,
they replaced the applicable law with "criminal assistance criminal offense".
The Chinese who violates the Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act receives cancellation of the status of residence
from the Minister of Justice and receives the administrative action
of "moving out of the country".
Those who provided the "false employment contract document" to the Chinese
who violates the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act are assistant
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
However, because it is administrative punishment "withdrawing to foreign countries",
it can not apply "Criminal law assistance crime".
In case
I have insisted on innocent ever since
I was arrested. Arrest / detention took more than a year.
About half a year I was bailed and I was imprisoned in prison for 1 year.
(Judgment is 1 year and a half imprisonment)
I got to know the news of the Violation of Immigration Control Act (2013 - 2014)
of the Philippine Embassy in the newspaper.
It was similar to us.
Prime Minister Teliza Mei, please just support the British citizen and me and the victims of the world with justice.
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
It is not enough for materials alone. Please contact us.
I need your courage. Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Contact email
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
and applied "criminal law, assistance crime" as aiding
in "illegal work outside the status of residence" .
Please laugh at ignorant Japanese judicial administration.
Dear Sirs, I am Japanese.
Prosecutors and others pointed out the reasons for assistance
by the Immigration Act 22-4-4 (False Documents Submission,
Rescission of Status of Residence),
and the offense has applied the crime aid for criminal law against violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act. The logic of law is crazy.
And they still do not accept this mistake.
Four Chinese who occurred in 2010 worked outside the status of residence permission
and were violated Article 70 of the Immigration Act and received criminal penalties.
"Each employer" who worked four Chinese people was not criminalized
for criminal violation of Immigration Act 73-2.
Employers were not even arrested.
Such punishment of international law fraud is a routine occurrence in Japan.
But the prosecutors of this case were more vicious because they wanted "Achievement".
They pointed out the aid acts of Article 22-4-4 (Cancellation of status of residence)
and arrested us for "criminal assistance crime" against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
Prosecutors and others for reasons of assistance of Article 22-4-4
of Immigration Control Act,
they replaced the applicable law with "criminal assistance criminal offense".
The Chinese who violates the Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act receives cancellation of the status of residence
from the Minister of Justice and receives the administrative action
of "moving out of the country".
Those who provided the "false employment contract document" to the Chinese
who violates the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act are assistant
under Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act.
However, because it is administrative punishment "withdrawing to foreign countries",
it can not apply "Criminal law assistance crime".
In case
I have insisted on innocent ever since
I was arrested. Arrest / detention took more than a year.
About half a year I was bailed and I was imprisoned in prison for 1 year.
(Judgment is 1 year and a half imprisonment)
I got to know the news of the Violation of Immigration Control Act (2013 - 2014)
of the Philippine Embassy in the newspaper.
It was similar to us.
Prime Minister Teliza Mei, please just support the British citizen and me and the victims of the world with justice.
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
It is not enough for materials alone. Please contact us.
I need your courage. Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Contact email
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
Comments
Post a Comment