To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2018-11-28: The Japanese government accepts foreign workers as "simple workers". The government refers to the number of people accepted by industry, but the status of residence is "Specific Skill No. 1" and they can work in all 14 industries. If it says by industry type, "qualification for residence" should be "specific skill in construction field" and so on. 14 "Qualification of residence" should be set for each type of industry. The government cheats the people here again. "Immigration law" is "easy to deceive". Even now, opposition lawmakers do not understand this meaning.

<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!


To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2018-11-28: The Japanese government accepts foreign workers as "simple workers".
The government refers to the number of people accepted by industry,
but the status of residence is "Specific Skill No. 1" and they can work in all 14 industries.
If it says by industry type, "qualification for residence" should be "specific skill
in construction field" and so on. 14 "Qualification of residence" should be set
for each type of industry.
The government cheats the people here again.
"Immigration law" is "easy to deceive".
Even now, opposition lawmakers do not understand this meaning.


Dear Sir, It is continuation of yesterday.

7  I explained to the police officer that "Mr. Moriyama" replaced my computer's hard disk.
The hard disk before the exchange was next to my desk. I explained.
The police officer told me he was listening to this from "Mr. Moriyama."
He already confirmed this.
I told the policeman,
"It is not true that I was" Destruction of evidence "of the hard disk before the exchange."
The policeman wrote this in the record. "
The hard disk before exchanging is what I use as an individual.
Mail and important data are on the server.
The network of such servers and personal computers is common sense.
The police 's mail server can not be found on "personal police officer" computers.
It is unthinkable investigation not to seize important server data
in today's criminal investigation.

8  Evidence is proved in "Personnel Planning Table".
These materials were stored on the data server.
Also, the mail information was stored in the mail server.
The way of doing work at that time was usually advancing work
by replying to the other 's mail.

9  At the trial I explained the "Destruction of evidence" by the police,
but the judge said it was unnatural.
In judgment, the judge said that I did "Destruction of evidence".

10  The police knew that I would arrest myself for reasons he created "Contract Documents
for False Employment".
The police must investigate the facts. "Searching for houses" does not search
for employment contracts being false.
The police should seek "provision of evidence" that the "employment contract" is the fact
before arrest.
In addition, seizing the e-mail data with business partners and "kinGungaku" is "fundamental
of investigation".
If I can not submit, even if employment contract is said to be false 'can not be helped.
Before the closing of the office, I was able to submit it if requested.
Even in "Survey of Facts" on illegal employment by illegal workers,
we will confiscate time recorder records and salary details.
It is clearly the police 's "Destruction of evidence".

11  The policeman made the following work to arrest me
for the reason that "Contents are false employment contracts" for me. ,
A). It is disadvantageous for the prosecution to prove the fact of employment at trial.
Therefore, it can be presumed that the police constructed the "Destruction
of evidence" beforehand without seizing the data of the mail server
or the main data server whose facts become clear,
because the personal computer's hard disk is empty.

B). Since the police officer was operating the personal computer at "investigation of the house" it should have been able to confirm on the spot that it was the initialized personal computer.
What the police say afterwards is unnatural.
From the technical power of the Metropolitan Police Department,
since the mail server and the data server are running, analysis is possible if it seizes it.
In recent years, policemen should know that most of the information is on the mail server.
It is unnatural that the police "do not seize" mail server or data server.

C). I think that the police dared to "abandon"
in fear of the disadvantageous information coming out from "my personal computer or server".

The police took me "reconfirm" twice.
When I told the police officer that "I will abandon all,"
the policeman made a "reconfirmation" that "it is all".
This is clearly a planned "Destruction of evidence" by the police.
12  After arrest, I questioned the police officers' police "Destruction of evidence".
A police officer said, "I will report it to the prosecutor,
if you are released, I should better collect evidence," he said.
Prosecutors did not listen to me, saying "Please only answer the question"
when I try to talk about this.
There is no point in talking about such things.

This case is a crime that illegally applied "applicable law".
Even if I acknowledge all the work of police and prosecutors,
I am innocent because I have not violated the law.
Please understand in fact that Japanese judicial "criminalizes" without being based on law.
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.

As Japan like the EU, do not divide the country into two with the problem of "foreign workers".
The flow of the world does not accept foreign workers into their own country.
If the labor force is insufficient, reduce exports and do not fight with America.
Stop making America the "food"!
This case is a violation of international law.
In each country "treaties ratified" take precedence over "laws of each country".
To "point out" a treaty violation is not "interference of domestic affairs".
The world should be ruled under the law.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The Japanese government is not entitled to claim "abduction of Japanese" by North Korea.
The Japanese government should "resolve" the "abduction of foreigners
by the Japanese government" incident as "top priority issue".
This e - mail is sent to the prime minister 's official every day like everyone.

Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp