Dear Sirs International people. Year-End & New Year's December 30, 2018: There are countless victims of "arrest / confinement" against Japanese law and international law by the Japanese government. Please condemn the ICC who ignore criminals of violent individuals.
<Public mail> #metoo Human rights victim!
Dear Sirs International people.
Year-End & New Year's December 30, 2018:
There are countless victims of "arrest / confinement" against Japanese law
and international law by the Japanese government.
Please condemn the ICC who ignore criminals of violent individuals.
Dear sirs. Please "listen" to the summary of the ICC complaint.
The basic rules of international law specifically target the following.
"International Covenant on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan
Article 2 (1) (3),
Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13,
Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17,
Article 26,
It is clearly in violation of the above, there is no accounting for any sin,
not only the Constitution of Japan and the law,
It is a crime against international law (false charges).
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
I've "claimed" two things in this case.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished with Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act uses employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal labor under the Immigration Act 73-2
(A crime that promoted illegal employment).
However, Japan's judiciary "disposses" only foreigners and does not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If "an employer who illegally employed" is innocent,
"a foreigner who worked illegally" is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. "Prosecution letter" "as a reason for crime,
It points out the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no criminal penalty against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "crime to support other crimes of criminal law" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "support" a lot of victims with your courage and justice.
I am asking the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for victims" of the victims.
Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
Dear Sirs International people.
Year-End & New Year's December 30, 2018:
There are countless victims of "arrest / confinement" against Japanese law
and international law by the Japanese government.
Please condemn the ICC who ignore criminals of violent individuals.
Dear sirs. Please "listen" to the summary of the ICC complaint.
The basic rules of international law specifically target the following.
"International Covenant on Citizenship and Political Rights" ratified by Japan
Article 2 (1) (3),
Article 4 (1),
Article 5 (2),
Article 9 (1) (5),
Article 13,
Article 14 (6),
Article 15 (1),
Article 16,
Article 17,
Article 26,
It is clearly in violation of the above, there is no accounting for any sin,
not only the Constitution of Japan and the law,
It is a crime against international law (false charges).
I will continue on tomorrow.
I will continue until you understand.
I've "claimed" two things in this case.
1. Foreigners conducted "illegal work" other than "qualification for residence".
But a foreigner is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished with Article 70 of the Immigration Act "Sins of illegal labor".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act uses employers
who are "cause-and-effect relationships" of illegal labor under the Immigration Act 73-2
(A crime that promoted illegal employment).
However, Japan's judiciary "disposses" only foreigners and does not dispose of employers.
This obviously violates "principle of equality under the law"
And it violates international law prohibiting conscious disposal only of foreigners.
If "an employer who illegally employed" is innocent,
"a foreigner who worked illegally" is innocent.
If so, there is no one "who supported other crimes of criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat in the Philippine country,
a staff member of the Philippine Embassy" is innocent.
2. "Prosecution letter" "as a reason for crime,
It points out the Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no criminal penalty against this.
Disposition is "cancellation of status of residence" by "Minister of Justice"
and "compulsory withdrawal to foreign countries".
Therefore, "crime to support other crimes of criminal law" can not be applied.
The Japanese government is "crushing" complaints.
But "crush" by state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Please "support" a lot of victims with your courage and justice.
I am asking the Japanese government to "recover honor"
and "compensate for victims" of the victims.
Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
Comments
Post a Comment