Dear Sirs International people. Sunday version, February 24, 2019: Police officers, prosecutors, and judges' crimes are obvious. However, the prosecution does not accept "complaint letters" and "letters of accusation." All information submitted is open to you only for you, you should know the actual state of Japanese judiciary and should report accurately. It is for peace ..

Dear Sirs International people.


Sunday version, February 24, 2019:
Police officers, prosecutors, and judges' crimes are obvious. However,
the prosecution does not accept "complaint letters" and "letters of accusation."
All information submitted is open to you only
for you, you should know the actual state of Japanese judiciary and should report accurately.
It is for peace ..

Dear sirs. Dear sirs. I think that my explanation has already been understood.
I have done all possible solutions in Japan.
We submitted "complaint letter"
nd "accusation letter" to the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office many times.
Please refer to the "complaint letter" and "accusation letter" on the web.
We will publish the continuation of that part.
Reasons for not accepting are as follows.

Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office, Special Investigation Department, No. 534
June 6, 2014
Yasuhiro Nagano.

Tokyo District Public Prosecutor's Office
Special investigation team "Tokusyu Cyokoku" team

I saw a document titled "Litigation Complaint" sent by you (dated May 25, 2014).
I also mentioned last time.
In the above written document, "what kind of grounds" are "each job act" of police officers,
prosecutors, judges involved in the investigation / trial?
Why is it supposed to be "abuse of duties"?
Specific content is not "become clear".
It is not recognized that the "fact of crime"
that becomes the subject of "complaint" is specifically "identified".
Therefore, the above document sent from you will be turned back.

The public prosecutor's office is not a court.
The citizen "provides" the "hint" "information" on which the crime was made to the "prosecution".
It is the work of "prosecutor" and "police officer" to conduct an investigation based on the "hint".
"IIC" requires "providing information".
Japan's judiciary calls for "report" by organizing "constituent external element of a crime".
For example, now people have been killed. constituent external element of a crime is "such and such."
With this, the people can not "inform". It's crazy.
This is the actual situation of Japanese judiciary.
Please see the "complaint letter" and "accusation letter" on the web.
"Constituent external element of a crime" is stated.
We provide "original" if requested.
Many people understand it.

I will continue with next week.

Please understand Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act.
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act

Full text is below.
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=1934&vm&re

This is the reason for the crime pointed out in the indictment
The prosecution says that we did "aiding
and abetting" of Article 22-4-4 "Revocation of Status of Residence" Immigration Act.
This punishment is the cancellation of "status of residence".

(Revocation of Status of Residence)
Article 22-4 A Minister of Justice may obtain a foreign national who resides
in Japan with the status of residence of the appended table 1 or the upper row
of appended table 2 under the recognition of a refugee under paragraph 1 of Article 61-2 ),
If any of the facts listed in each of the following items is found,
the applicant may revoke the status of residence that the alien actually has
under the procedure specified by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice.

1 omitted
2 omission
3 omitted
※ ※ ※ ※
"A bill of indictment" is "posting" 4 below. It's crazy.
Documents submitted to the "Tokyo Immigration Bureau"
by the Chinese people fall under the following 4.
The prosecution "points out" that we have "offered" this document "false document"
to Chinese people.

4 In addition to what is listed in the preceding three items,
documents containing misrepresented documents
(certificates and misrepresentations stipulated in Article 7-2, paragraph 1,
which was issued by submission or presentation of documents with misstatements
or drawings Including a visa received by a passport by submitting
or presenting a certain document or drawing of the same) or a seal
or the like of landing permission by submission or presentation of drawings.

5 omitted
(Forced deportation)
(Deportation)
Article 24 For a foreign national who falls under any of the following items,
it is possible to force the eviction from Japan by the procedure prescribed in the next chapter.

* The following was added in 2010 July.
(3) Invalidly illegally giving a certificate under the provisions
of the preceding paragraph 1 or 2 illegally to another foreigner,
a seal of the landing permit (including the record under the provisions
of Article 9 paragraph 4) or permission, Forgery or alteration of documents or drawings,
creation of false documents or drawings,
forgery or forgery or creation of documents or drawings for the purpose
of allowing permission for landing pursuant to the provisions of the clause
or permission under the provisions of Section 1 or 3 of the next chapter A person
who exercises, possesses, or provides for altered documents or drawings
or false documents or drawings, or suggests or helps these acts

There is no "good abduction" or "bad abduction" in abduction / confinement. Help me!

There are many victims around the world.
Please support "Appeal to ICC".

The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

In case
The above translation documents are inaccurate, so please contact us by e-mail.

Sincerely yours, Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp