To President Trump At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-05-30:Dear Sirs, why is President Donald Trump not arrested? It is not a "Russia case" but that Trump golf course hired illegal immigrants. So, will the president "protect" the offending "judicial administration of Japan"?

To President Trump


At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-05-30:Dear Sirs, why is President Donald Trump not arrested?
It is not a "Russia case" but that Trump golf course hired illegal immigrants.
So, will the president "protect" the offending "judicial administration of Japan"?

Part 1. It is a "judgment document" of "assistance.
Case" of "the immigration law violation case" of 2010.
This "reason for crime" is "prescribed" punishment in Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
Foreigners who get "status of residence"
in false documents will be "deported" with "status of residence" being cancelled.
As I mentioned the day before, prosecutors
and judges have stated that it is a crime for me to "issue" false documents
(content false employment contracts etc.) to the Chinese.
In order to describe correctly, the Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act is described in Japanese and English.
Please translate Japanese correctly.

第二十二条の四　法務大臣は、
別表第一又は別表第二の上欄の在留資格をもつて本邦に在留する外国人
（第六十一条の二第一項の難民の認定を受けている者を除く。）について、
次の各号に掲げるいずれかの事実が判明したときは、
法務省令で定める手続により、当該外国人が現に有する在留資格を取り消すことができる。

Article 22-4　(1)　Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien residing in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of Appended Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2,
paragraph (1)),
the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status of residence
in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance.

四　前三号に掲げるもののほか、
不実の記載のある文書（不実の記載のある文書又は図画の提出又は提示により
交付を受けた第七条の二第一項の規定による証明書及び不実の記載のある文書
又は 図画の提出又は提示により旅券に受けた査証を含む。）
又は図画の提出又は提示により、上陸許可の証印等を受けたこと。

(iv)　In addition to the cases listed in the preceding three items,
the alien has received,
by submitting or presenting a document that contains a false entry
(including the certificate pursuant to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
obtained by submitting or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry
and a visa obtained for the passport by submitting or presenting a document
or drawing that contains a false entry) or a drawing that contains a false entry,
a seal of verification for landing.
Please understand the Immigration Act Article 22-4- (4).
The prosecutor and the judge gave me false documents to the Chinese.
So the Chinese got "status of residence".
So the Chinese did "illegal labor" of Article 70 of the immigration.
This is said to be an "act" that "supports" a violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
This logic is this crazy.
Even if it is a fact,
If the Chinese work within the scope of "status of residence",
the Chinese will not be "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The “causal relationship” they became illegal labor is
It is in the "employer" who hired them.
The Immigration Act stipulates that Article 73-2 strictly punishes employers.
Please understand and support this legal system and the logic of the law.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners,
but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano

Email 


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************