To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

To everyone in the world's media　

2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims
of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved
in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1: The entrance method is explained in the following section.
It was "promulgated" on October 4, 1951, and "enforced" on November 1 of the same year,
under the title of "Entry and Exit Control Order" as one of the "Pawdam command".

Under the provisions of Article 4 of the Act on Measures of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
 (Law No. 126 of 1947) based on the case concerning the order issued
 by the "Acceptance" of the Potsdam Declaration,
 the "Peace Treaty with Japan" Since the "Persistent Measures" were issued
 after "Effective Date" (April 28, 1952, April 28, 1952),
 "Laws and ordinances are effective" Are treated as having an effect,
 and all subsequent amendments are also made by law.
With the entry of Japan into the Refugee Convention and the Refugee Protocol,
the title was changed to the current one on January 1, 1982 (Showa 57).

The form is a government ordinance but the effect is equal to the law,
and the title of the title is "law" but not "law".
Normally, in the laws and ordinances, there is a provision concerning the purpose
and purpose at the beginning (Article 1), and in this context,
as the style that refers to the law itself,
"this law (ordinance) is aimed at ○○" This part
of the Immigration Control Law is indicated as "This Cabinet Order"
in the era of the Immigration Control Order, and "Immigration Control
and Immigration Control Law" after the title amendment is used.
And it is considered not to be labeled "this law" which can not be used unless it is a law.

As for the abbreviated terms, the fact that "entry and exit management"
and "refugee recognition" are "parallel" in the official title,
and that there is no "inevitability"
in the article on refugees, Etc. ", the term" immigration law "refers to" many cases ",
but in the case of" official documents "of" other laws and regulations ",
the term" immigration law "is used as a general rule.
Actual immigration control is carried out by the Immigration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice,
the Immigration Control and Immigration Bureau, and the Minister of Justice,
the Immigration Inspector, and the Immigration Security Officer.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal"
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code
and Article 62 of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support
of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************