SOS Opinion To President Trump 2019-08-30: Dear Sir, The reason for the decision is “comedy”. Let's all laugh at the skills of Japanese judges. At least each country can refute if the Japanese government says it is a violation of international law. You can argue against Japan that Japan should "protect" international law
To President Trump
2019-08-30: Dear Sir,
The reason for the decision is “comedy”.
Let's all laugh at the skills of Japanese judges.
At least each country can refute if the Japanese government says it is a violation
of international law. You can argue against Japan that Japan should "protect" international law
and "protect" human rights. Of course, the Korean government can also say.
However, saying that there is no person
in the Korean government who understands the law is “comedy”.
Part 1. Crime fact of this incident.
Prosecutors punish foreigners for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act,
but do not want to “punish” employers who are causal.
Employers are “rules” punishable by “the crime of promoting illegal employment”
in Article 73-3 of the Immigration Control Act.
Everything begins with "crime" from here.
This case is a crime of "support" for "illegal labor"
in the Immigration Act Article 70 "Unqualified Activities".
The prosecutor does not want to apply the “sin”
of “support” provided by the Immigration Act to employers.
It is Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act "Sin that promotes illegal employment".
So the prosecutor "devised" a "false law".
The reasons for criminal offense were “disposition” and “support”
in Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor applied the following as the “guilty of support”
in Article 70 “Unqualified Activities” of the Immigration Control Act.
Criminal Code Article 60, 62, "Sin to support other crimes".
It ’s completely “crazy”.
I do not understand the logic of law at all.
You will think you are a lie.
So take a look at the “bil of indictment” published on the web.
The Immigration Law Article 24-4- (4),
which is the reason for the crime, is “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
(1) “Cancel” the “Residence Status” granted.
(2) Then, order to move out of the country.
Therefore, support under Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act is not a crime.
As a result of the amendment to the Immigration Act implemented on July 1, 2010, “foreigners
who supported Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act” were disposed of as follows.
It is “same disposal” as a foreigner who violated Article 24-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
If you first understand the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 “Cancellation
of Status of Residence”, you will know the “method” of this crime.
Suppose you “deliver” a “false document” to a foreigner.
Suppose that the foreigner has obtained a "resident status".
However, if you work within the scope of the “Residence Status” you are given,
you will not be considered as “Labor outside the status of residence”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, this is a violation of the Immigration Act 24-4- (4).
Therefore, the reason for the decision is “comedy”.
Japanese judicial officials are crazy because they don't even know this.
At least each country can “refute” even if the Japanese government points out “violation
of international law”.
We can “assert” that Japan should protect “international law” and “protect” human rights.
Of course, the Korean government can also say.
However, there is no “person who understands the law” in the Korean government.
This is crazy.
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
2019-08-30: Dear Sir,
The reason for the decision is “comedy”.
Let's all laugh at the skills of Japanese judges.
At least each country can refute if the Japanese government says it is a violation
of international law. You can argue against Japan that Japan should "protect" international law
and "protect" human rights. Of course, the Korean government can also say.
However, saying that there is no person
in the Korean government who understands the law is “comedy”.
Part 1. Crime fact of this incident.
Prosecutors punish foreigners for violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act,
but do not want to “punish” employers who are causal.
Employers are “rules” punishable by “the crime of promoting illegal employment”
in Article 73-3 of the Immigration Control Act.
Everything begins with "crime" from here.
This case is a crime of "support" for "illegal labor"
in the Immigration Act Article 70 "Unqualified Activities".
The prosecutor does not want to apply the “sin”
of “support” provided by the Immigration Act to employers.
It is Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act "Sin that promotes illegal employment".
So the prosecutor "devised" a "false law".
The reasons for criminal offense were “disposition” and “support”
in Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
The prosecutor applied the following as the “guilty of support”
in Article 70 “Unqualified Activities” of the Immigration Control Act.
Criminal Code Article 60, 62, "Sin to support other crimes".
It ’s completely “crazy”.
I do not understand the logic of law at all.
You will think you are a lie.
So take a look at the “bil of indictment” published on the web.
The Immigration Law Article 24-4- (4),
which is the reason for the crime, is “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
(1) “Cancel” the “Residence Status” granted.
(2) Then, order to move out of the country.
Therefore, support under Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act is not a crime.
As a result of the amendment to the Immigration Act implemented on July 1, 2010, “foreigners
who supported Article 24-4- (4) of the Immigration Act” were disposed of as follows.
It is “same disposal” as a foreigner who violated Article 24-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
If you first understand the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4 “Cancellation
of Status of Residence”, you will know the “method” of this crime.
Suppose you “deliver” a “false document” to a foreigner.
Suppose that the foreigner has obtained a "resident status".
However, if you work within the scope of the “Residence Status” you are given,
you will not be considered as “Labor outside the status of residence”
under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, this is a violation of the Immigration Act 24-4- (4).
Therefore, the reason for the decision is “comedy”.
Japanese judicial officials are crazy because they don't even know this.
At least each country can “refute” even if the Japanese government points out “violation
of international law”.
We can “assert” that Japan should protect “international law” and “protect” human rights.
Of course, the Korean government can also say.
However, there is no “person who understands the law” in the Korean government.
This is crazy.
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
Continue to next week.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
Comments
Post a Comment