To President Trump 2019-10-18: Dear Sir, There are calls from embassies in several countries. A Japanese secretary interprets me. The ambassador declares that conversation is a personal idea. "It's a terrible false charge" "It's a lie application method" ... The ambassador of the other party seems to be frustrated. At the end, he says, "I think it will take time, but please do your best." I think Japan is a “backward nation.”

To President Trump


2019-10-18: Dear Sir,
There are calls from embassies in several countries. A Japanese secretary interprets me. The ambassador declares that conversation is a personal idea. "It's a terrible false charge" "It's a lie application method" ... The ambassador of the other party seems to be frustrated. At the end, he says, "I think it will take time, but please do your best." I think Japan is a “backward nation.”


Part 1. This case is exactly the same as the 2010 immigration law violation
(non-qualified activity) case.
Four Chinese who were accused of Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”
in violation of “equality under the law” and international law.
And it is exactly the same way that "I and the Chinese Kingungaku" were punished
by "Sinners to Support Other Crimes"
in Article 60 and Article 62 of the Criminal Code for the violation
of Article 70 of the Immigration Law of 4 Chinese.

First, about violations of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
It is true that the Philippines worked in the landscaping.
This is a violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
However, employers will not be punished under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Since the grace period of 3 years has passed since the immigration law revision in 2010,
no excuses can be made.
There are regulations that do not allow excuses in the Immigration Act.
The police and prosecutors have discretion.
However, it is against international law to punish only foreigners “consciously”.
If the employer is innocent, the foreigner is also innocent.

Next is the application of Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code.
The reason for the crime is that "providing" a "false employment contract"
to the "foreigner who violated the Immigration Control Law" is claimed to be a crime.
This act is to support the Immigration Act Article 24-4-4.
This act is not a crime.
This action is clearly described in the 2010 Immigration Act amendment.
1) Cancellation of status of residence.
2) Forced to leave the country.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code cannot be applied.

"Supplement.
The submission of an “Employment Agreement” is not based on law.
This is submitted by the employer in cooperation with the Immigration Administration.
Therefore, punishment is not possible because the "employment contract" is false.
There are provisions in Article 31 of the Constitution.

Even if you obtain a “Residence Status” from a false “Employment Contract”,
if you work within the scope of that “Resident Status”,
you will not be in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.

I hope the people concerned will “give oneself up” as soon as possible.
I pray that Japan will be governed by law.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak 2023-04-06: In the United States, wages continue to rise due to labor shortages, and the latest average hourly wage exceeds 4,300 yen. You can no longer "compare" with Japan!

Au président français Emmanuel Macron 2023-04-03 : Mais," le "discours" de Zelensky est "unfunny kann nicht lachen". "Rappelez-vous l'attaque de Pearl Harbor. Cet horrible matin du 7 décembre 1941."

2023년 10월 08일: 아르메니아의 수도인 예레반에서는 이웃 나라 아제르바이잔이 계쟁지 나고르노 칼라바프를 공격해도 아무것도 하지 않은 '동맹국' 러시아에 대해 시민의 분노가 폭발했다., #Armenia #Azerbaijan #Russia