In addition, it is embarrassing that "bribery" and "rights to gain unfair profits" are generated by "introduction of the system".

 The Chinese Army conducted a joint land, sea and air exercise!

This exercise is considered to be a virtual "assuming" of landing in Taiwan.

https://blogos.com/article/490434/

https://abema.tv/video/episode/89-93_s10_p5581

2020-10-13: Dear Sir,

Minister Kono once again "just mouths"! Even if the "hanko" is abolished, 

"approval" is still required. I don't think it is possible 

with current Japanese technology to safely make "electronic approvals" 

from "home." The government has requested all ministries not to use "hanko (signature)" 

in administrative procedures.

I think the gist of abolishing "hanko (signature)" is 

to change "real" hanko "to" electronically approved hanko (signature) ".

I think it is a necessary "means" for "electronic administration."

The "method" should be explained to the public in an easy-to-understand manner 

so that there is no misunderstanding.

The Japanese government's "digital administration" does not trust the "government system" 

like the "My Number Card".

Document management is still "sloppy". When it comes to "electronic approval,"

 "document management" is no longer reliable.

In order to build a safe and secure document management system, 

we would like you to introduce a proven system from Western countries, etc.,

 instead of building it from scratch, and build it quickly and inexpensively.

We are "concerned" that "responsibility" will be "passed on" to others because 

of "digital management" of the government's "injustice."

In addition, it is embarrassing 

that "bribery" and "rights to gain unfair profits" are generated by "introduction of the system".

Part 1 Minister Kono asked "ministries and agencies" to answer whether the abolition is possible 

by the end of last month over the "abolition" of "hanko" (signature).

As a result, it is expected that more than 90% will be abolished, and the remaining examples are "under scrutiny".

Emphasizing that saying that the "law" "requests" a "hanko (signature)" is not a reason.

He showed "recognition" that the "hanko (signature)" can be virtually abolished.

https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/68de030bdf32411aa3dd394d03edf3ff8cb5a4a4

The government announced its official opinion, what was the real "hanko (signature)"!

While the "new coronavirus" is rampant all over the world

One of the things that attracted attention in Japan was the "real" "hanko (sign)".

Even companies that have increased "working from home" due to "self-restraint 

from going out" due to "declaration of emergency"

There was a "businessman" who was forced to "go to work" because of a "real stamp" 

in "contracts between companies" and "applications to government agencies".

While sympathy gathers for those who have to "go to work" for "real" "hanko (signature)"

The government's public opinion on "real" "hanko (signature)" is a hot topic.

https://business.nikkei.com/atcl/gen/19/00002/062201220/

I think the public is misunderstanding and worried about "personal seals".

An alternative to Western "signatures" is "personal seals".

Therefore, I don't think it is possible to eliminate "signatures" and "personal seals."

Physical "signatures" and "personal seals" should be understood to be "virtually" "performed" 

within an "electronic system."

"Hanko (personal seal)" also has "reliable system" such as "registration of seal".

"Virtual" "signatures" and "personal seals" performed in electronic systems require "high reliability".

It cannot be designed and built in a short period of time.

You should consider introducing a proven system in Western countries.

There is the same anxiety as "My Number" in virtual "certification of seal".

Parliamentarians and bureaucrats should understand the "electronic system" 

and give the correct explanation to the public.

I will write tomorrow, too.

The amendment to the Immigration Control Act in January 2017 states 

that "I am not guilty" as the reason for the amendment. 

Reason: Amend from "cannot be punished" to "can be punished".

It is a false charge. Thank you to everyone in the international community. 

However, the Japanese government has not yet apologized. See below for the indictment. (Japanese)

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/c9639cd8d9ab6f7d734bdbb61511a31e

Part 2 See below.

Japanese.

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/d28c05d97af7a48394921a2dc1ae8f98

English.

https://blog.goo.ne.jp/nipponnoasa/e/ac718e4f2aab09297bdab896a94bd194

Best regards.

https://abema.tv/video/episode/89-93_s10_p5581

Yasuhiro Nagan

For uncertainties, please contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp