3/11/2025

To British Prime Minister 2025-03-12: "Russia's invasion of Ukraine" should be "Russia was forced to invade! Russia's in-vasion of Ukraine." Please note that Israel is on Russia's side, not on Europe's side. This is common knowledge around the world.

 To British Prime Minister 



2025-03-12: Weekday edition,

The world has changed under the Trump administration. On February 24, three years after the Ukraine war, the United Nations General Assembly held a special session and adopted a resolution condemning Russia with a majority of 93 countries. However, 18 countries, including the United States and Russia, opposed the resolu-tion, and 65 countries abstained.


Then, the UN Security Council was held and a resolution calling for an end to the conflict submitted by the United States was adopted with a majority of 10 countries. This resolution did not include any condemnation of Russia, and five countries, in-cluding the United States' major allies, the United Kingdom and France, abstained.


The United States sided with Russia in two votes on this day, highlighting the change in the United States' position on the "Ukraine War." The Trump administra-tion has completely broken away from the Biden administration's idea of "fabricating reasons for the war."


Surprisingly, the United States did not abstain from the European proposal, but vot-ed against it. 18 countries, including the United States, Russia, Israel, North Korea, Sudan, and Hungary, opposed it.


"Russia's invasion of Ukraine" should be "Russia was forced to invade! Russia's in-vasion of Ukraine." Please note that Israel is on Russia's side, not on Europe's side. This is common knowledge around the world.


It is said that it is unusual for the United States to be in conflict with European countries that are supposed to be allies. I think that Europe, which has many left-ists, embodies "neo-Nazi ideology."


For the "left" in the West, a "revolution" called "war" is necessary to reset the cur-rent economy. The United States has changed from "revolutionary Biden" to "con-servative Trump," but this is the reality.


I am a "conservative." Trump is a "conservative," so I am against "resetting the economy through war." He will protect the American economy and jobs with "tar-iffs." "I" will employ temporary immigrants at low wages in "special economic zones" to counter "BRICS."


During the Biden administration, I feared that the world would enter "World War III." Fortunately, Trump, who pledged to end the Ukrainian war as soon as possible, was elected, and the world was saved.


At this UN General Assembly, 93 countries voted in favor of the resolution submit-ted by the European side. The Trump administration will try to "unravel" the "fabri-cation" that caused the "Ukrainian war". Next year, many countries will realize the "fabrication".


European diplomats are still lying about "full-scale Russian aggression". They have submitted a more detailed resolution supporting Ukraine's sovereignty and territori-al integrity. It's completely crazy.


European citizens should oppose the policy of accepting "illegal immigrants and ref-ugees" in their own countries. They should demand that the current administration "resign". I think the energy problem will be solved if the current administration re-signs.


In Ukraine, more than half of the working population were "migrant workers" to the EU. When the war ends, discharged soldiers will return to their jobs as migrant workers. There will be no labor force to rebuild Ukraine.


If we become a pro-Russian administration, the energy problem will be solved. This will cause the economy to move, but the labor shortage will become more pro-nounced and the economy will stagnate. The solution is to build "overseas special economic zones."


Part 1 Citations and References

The United States sides with Russia and votes against UN resolution regarding in-vasion of Ukraine

https://www.bbc.com/japanese/articles/c4gezxkgej7o


I'll write again tomorrow



Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".


"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!


First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.


"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.


In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.


However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.


As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".


As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.


Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.


In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".


In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.


The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".


<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.


"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)


The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".


If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).


Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.


The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:


1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."


2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).


3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."


4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."


5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."


6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."


This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."


This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.


The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."


My argument:


"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.


"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.


Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.


The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."


However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.


The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.


Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.


Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.


Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.


Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.


Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."


NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/


For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.


Thank you.


Yasuhiro Nagano


Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/



No comments:

Post a Comment

2025/03/14:على الشركات التي تبني مصانع في "المنطقة الخاصة على الحدود المكسيكية" أن تبني مصنعين. أحدهما يطل على البحر الكاريبي، والآخر يُصدّر إلى دول المحيط الهادئ مثل أوروبا وأفريقيا وأمريكا الجنوبية.

 ١٤ مارس ٢٠٢٥: طبعة أيام الأسبوع، [نيبون تي في: صباح الأحد] السيارات الأمريكية لا تُباع في اليابان لضعف استهلاكها للوقود. هل "الحاجز غي...