<Public mail> #MeToo Human rights victim!
Therefore,
the prosecutor ignores criminal charges against the criminal offense of the prosecutor.
Please request Japan "governance under the law".
Dear Sirs, I am Japanese.
Prosecutors and others conducted a very malicious crime in "assistance case
for violation of Immigration Control Act" that occurred in 2010.
Normally,
those who illegally employed foreigners are not punished
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act "Crime that promotes illegal labor".
Only foreigners who worked illegally were punished (fined)
for exclusion outside the country with "sins that worked illegally".
Although this method is also a violation of international law,
the international community is incompetent to Japanese law, so there was no problem.
But in this case, a young prosecutor wanted to get "achievement".
So he suggested that foreigners be sentenced to imprisonment rather than fine.
Therefore,
the prosecutor was not an employer of "a crime that promotes illegal labor"
but a person who assisted illegal labor instead of that was necessary.
Those who have nothing to do with "those who assisted illegal labor".
In other words, the person
who assisted "Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Control Act" was "a person
who assisted illegal work", and we made up documents for prosecution.
The prosecutor swapped the application law. It is a terrible act.
The content of crime is written in "document of indictment".
It is stated in the "written document of prosecution"
that we have carried out an aid act to "cancel a status of residence
y submitting false documents and submitting false documents" prescribed
in Article 24-4-4 of Immigration Control Act It has been.
Prosecutors point out that
I and Kin Gungaku provided the Chinese with "contract document of employment"
whose content is "false".
In the "law applying,"
it was not "a crime of assistance" against Article 24-4-4 of the immigration law
but made it a "crime of assistance" against the immigration law Article 70 (illegal labor).
What I offered is a legitimate "employment contract".
It is not an "employment contract" whose content is false.
However, even if the prosecutor's opinion is 100% approved,
it is an act of assisting the Article 24-4-4 of Immigration Control Act.
Punishment for assistance "of the criminal law can not be applied to
the administrative penalty of Article 24-4-4 (cancellation of status of residence)
of Immigration Control Act.
Continue.
Everyone in the international community,
please worry about the situation in Japan.
Everyone in the world, please make Japan Japan "governed under the law of the law".
The Japanese government has an obligation to apologize
and restore our honor and to compensate damages as soon as possible.
However, the Japanese government still ignores this case today.
There is a limit to life. Please help me.
President Donald Trump 's reply encourages me.
President Donald J. Trump believes the strength of our American people
and their willingness to stay informed and get involved.
President Trump appreciates you taking the time to reach out.
The material is below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Best regards Yasuhiro Nagano
Request to media ******************************************
This humanitarian crime is a more severe crime than a Japanese abduction crime by North Korea.
Please introduce the unbelievable "humanitarian crime of application law violation" of the officials of the Japanese government with your media!
Your justice action will lead to the elimination of terror crime from the earth!
International Criminal Court:
Japan officially became a Party of 105 countries on October 1, 2007.
The Rome Statute and its cooperation law came into force on October 1, 2007 under domestic law.
Rome Statute on the International Criminal Court
This case falls under the following case. This incident occurred in 2010.
Article 7 Crimes against humanity
(E) significant deprivation of detention and other physical freedoms
in violation of the basic rules of international law
Preamble · Article 1 (Court)
The International Criminal Court complements the criminal jurisdiction of the state.
Article 27 (irrelevance of public qualification)
The International Criminal Court Regulations, regardless of their public qualifications,
It applies equally to all.
Even heads of State, lawmakers, public officials are not exempt
from criminal liability based on the regulations.
My information *************************************************
I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.
It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
*****************************************************************
