Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-05-21:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die philippinische Regierung ist 2013-2014 in der philippinischen Botschaft in Japan aufgetreten Warum protestieren Sie nicht gegen die japanische Regierung im Fall der Verletzung des Einwanderungsgesetzes? Botschaftsbeamte und Diplomaten sind "unschuldig". Ich habe viele Male Briefe und E-Mails verschickt. Wir senden auch täglich E-Mails an die philippinischen Medien!

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-05-21:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die philippinische Regierung ist 2013-2014 in der philippinischen Botschaft in Japan aufgetreten
Warum protestieren Sie nicht gegen die japanische Regierung im Fall der Verletzung des Einwanderungsgesetzes?
Botschaftsbeamte und Diplomaten sind "unschuldig".
Ich habe viele Male Briefe und E-Mails verschickt.
Wir senden auch täglich E-Mails an die philippinischen Medien!


Teil 1. Es gibt zwei Arten von Fällen.
Botschaftsmitarbeiter und Diplomaten werden als Fahrer eingestellt
Ich übergebe dem philippinischen Volk einen „Arbeitsvertrag“.
Also haben die Philippinen ein "spezifisches Visum" bekommen.
Aber sie arbeiteten im "Landschaftsbau", ohne als Fahrer zu arbeiten.
Sie verstießen also gegen § 70 Abs. 4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Inhaftiert wegen (Straftat, Einkommen zu verdienen, wenn man außerhalb des Aufenthaltsstatus arbeitet).
Arbeitgeber, die unqualifizierte Philippinen eingestellt haben, wurden nicht verhaftet.
Ich bestehe darauf, dass sie wie Chinesen "nicht schuldig" sind.

Der Grund ist derselbe wie beim Chinesen vom Vortag.

Das Personal und die Diplomaten der Botschaft, die den Arbeitsvertrag an die Philippinen übergeben haben, sind nicht schuldig.
Sie gaben dem philippinischen Fahrer einen "falschen Arbeitsvertrag".
Also wurden sie bestraft.
Der Name des Verbrechens ist das Strafgesetzbuch 69 & 62 "Sünde der Beihilfe" gegen den Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 Absatz 4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
Dies ist ein Verstoß gegen "das anwendbare Recht".
Angenommen, sie erkennen 100% der "angeklagten Tatsache" der "Anklageschrift" an.
Der Grund für die Straftat sei in Artikel 22-4 Absatz 4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes beschrieben.

Artikel 22-4 (1) Wenn einer der folgenden Sachverhalte festgestellt wird
in Bezug auf einen Ausländer mit Wohnsitz in Japan, dessen Aufenthaltsstatus aufgeführt ist
in der linken Spalte der beigefügten Tabelle I oder der beigefügten Tabelle II
 (mit Ausnahme derjenigen, die als Flüchtlinge gemäß Artikel 61-2 Absatz 1 anerkannt sind),
 Der Justizminister kann den Status des Ausländers widerrufen
 Wohnsitz in Übereinstimmung mit den in der Verordnung des Justizministeriums vorgesehenen Verfahren.

(iv) Zusätzlich zu den in den vorhergehenden drei Punkten aufgeführten Fällen
der Ausländer hat durch Einreichen oder Vorlegen eines Dokuments, das eine falsche Eingabe enthält, erhalten
(einschließlich der Bescheinigung gemäß Artikel 7-2,
Absatz (1), erhalten durch Zeichnung oder Vorlage eines Dokuments
oder eine Zeichnung, die eine falsche Einreise und ein Visum für den Reisepass enthält
durch Einreichen oder Präsentieren eines Dokuments oder einer Zeichnung, die eine falsche Eingabe enthält)
oder eine Zeichnung, die eine falsche Eingabe enthält, ein Prüfsiegel für die Landung.

Submit "Vertragsdokumente für falsche Beschäftigung"
Der philippinische Fahrer, der den "Aufenthaltsstatus" erhalten hat, ist
"Aufenthaltsstatus" wird aufgehoben und wird zu "Abschiebung".
Dies ist eine Anordnung des Justizministers. Es ist keine Strafe.

Daher ist die "Beihilfe" von Artikel 22-4 Absatz 4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "unschuldig".
Das „Revisions- und Einwanderungskontrollgesetz“, das am 1. Juli 2010 in Kraft getreten ist, lautet jedoch wie folgt.
Ausländer, die im Rahmen des Einwanderungsgesetzes 22-4 (4) "mitgeholfen" haben, sind dieselben wie Zuwanderer im Rahmen des Einwanderungsgesetzes 22-4 (4).
Der Justizminister wird eine "administrative Disposition" treffen.
Sie sind die Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus und die Abschiebung.

Was macht die philippinische Regierung? Es ist verrückt.
Die philippinische Regierung sollte gegen die japanische Regierung protestieren und ihre "Wiederherstellung der Ehre" und Wiedergutmachung fordern.

Bitte überprüfen Sie die oben aufgeführten Einwanderungsgesetze (in englischer Sprache).
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1 Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Andererseits bestraft das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die nach Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes (eine Straftat, die illegale Arbeit fördert) "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit haben.

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2 Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".

Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall von Verstößen gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden, unterstützen Sie bitte den "Appell" an den "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-05-21: There are two types of this case. Embassy officials and diplomats give "employment agreement" to the Philippine people for employment as their driver. So the Philippines got a "specific visa". But they worked in the "Landscaping shop" without working as their driver. So they were arrested for violation of section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act (a crime of earning income by working outside the scope of the status of residence). Employers who have hired unqualified Philippines have not been arrested. I insist that they are "Not guilty" like Chinese.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-05-21:Dear Sirs, Why does the Philippine government not protest the Japanese government
for the "Immigration Act violation case" that occurred at the Philippine Embassy
in Japan in 2013-2014? Embassy officials and diplomats are "innocent."
I have sent letters and emails many times.
We also send emails daily to the Philippine media!


Part 1. There are two types of this case.
Embassy officials and diplomats give "employment agreement" to the Philippine people
for employment as their driver.
So the Philippines got a "specific visa".
But they worked in the "Landscaping shop" without working as their driver.
So they were arrested for violation of section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act
 (a crime of earning income by working outside the scope of the status of residence).
Employers who have hired unqualified Philippines have not been arrested.
I insist that they are "Not guilty" like Chinese.

The reason is the same as the previous day's Chinese.

The embassy staff and diplomats
who have handed over the Employment Contract to the Philippines are not guilty.
They gave the Philippine driver a "false employment contract".
So they were punished.
The name of the crime is the criminal code 69 & 62 "sin of aiding"
for violation of the Immigration Control Act 70 (4).
This is a violation of the "applicable law".
Suppose that they recognize 100% of the "charged fact" of "bill of indictment."
It states that the reason for the crime is described in Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Act.

Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien resident in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of an attached Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2, paragraph (1)),
the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status of residence
in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance.

(iv) Inclusion to the cases listed in the precedent three items,
the alien has received,
by subscribing or presenting a document that contains a false entry
 (including the certificate to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
 paragraph (1), acquired by submitting or presenting a document or drawing
 that contains a false entry and a visa acquired for the passport
 by subscribing or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry)
 or a drawing that contains a false negative action .

A Filipino driver who has submitted a "contract document of false employment"
and obtained "status of residence" will be canceled as "status of residence"
and become "Deportation".
This is an order by the Minister of Justice. It is not a punishment.

Therefore, the "aiding" of Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Act is "innocent."
However, the “Revision, Immigration Control Act”,
which was constructed from July 1, 2010, is as follows.
Foreigners who have conducted "aiding"
under Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Control Act will receive "administrative sanctions"
from the Minister of Justice in the same way as violators under Article 22-4 (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
They are the cancellation of the status of residence and the deportation.

What is the Philippine government doing? It's crazy.
The Philippine government should protest the Japanese government
and demand their "recovery of honor" and reparations.

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-05-21:Dear Sirs, Why does the Philippine government not protest the Japanese government for the "Immigration Act violation case" that occurred at the Philippine Embassy in Japan in 2013-2014? Embassy officials and diplomats are "innocent." I have sent letters and emails many times. We also send emails daily to the Philippine media!

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-05-21:Dear Sirs, Why does the Philippine government not protest the Japanese government
for the "Immigration Act violation case" that occurred at the Philippine Embassy
in Japan in 2013-2014? Embassy officials and diplomats are "innocent."
I have sent letters and emails many times.
We also send emails daily to the Philippine media!


Part 1. There are two types of this case.
Embassy officials and diplomats give "employment agreement" to the Philippine people
for employment as their driver.
So the Philippines got a "specific visa".
But they worked in the "Landscaping shop" without working as their driver.
So they were arrested for violation of section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act
 (a crime of earning income by working outside the scope of the status of residence).
Employers who have hired unqualified Philippines have not been arrested.
I insist that they are "Not guilty" like Chinese.

The reason is the same as the previous day's Chinese.

The embassy staff and diplomats
who have handed over the Employment Contract to the Philippines are not guilty.
They gave the Philippine driver a "false employment contract".
So they were punished.
The name of the crime is the criminal code 69 & 62 "sin of aiding"
for violation of the Immigration Control Act 70 (4).
This is a violation of the "applicable law".
Suppose that they recognize 100% of the "charged fact" of "bill of indictment."
It states that the reason for the crime is described in Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Act.

Article 22-4 (1) Where any of the following facts are found
with respect to an alien resident in Japan under a status of residence listed
in the left-hand column of an attached Table I or Appended Table II
(except for those recognized as refugees set forth in Article 61-2, paragraph (1)),
the Minister of Justice may revoke the alien's status of residence
in accordance with the procedures provided for by a Ministry of Justice ordinance.

(iv) Inclusion to the cases listed in the precedent three items,
the alien has received,
by subscribing or presenting a document that contains a false entry
 (including the certificate to the provisions of Article 7-2, paragraph (1),
 paragraph (1), acquired by submitting or presenting a document or drawing
 that contains a false entry and a visa acquired for the passport
 by subscribing or presenting a document or drawing that contains a false entry)
 or a drawing that contains a false negative action .

A Filipino driver who has submitted a "contract document of false employment"
and obtained "status of residence" will be canceled as "status of residence"
and become "Deportation".
This is an order by the Minister of Justice. It is not a punishment.

Therefore, the "aiding" of Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Act is "innocent."
However, the “Revision, Immigration Control Act”,
which was constructed from July 1, 2010, is as follows.
Foreigners who have conducted "aiding"
under Article 22-4 (4) of the Immigration Control Act will receive "administrative sanctions"
from the Minister of Justice in the same way as violators under Article 22-4 (4)
of the Immigration Control Act.
They are the cancellation of the status of residence and the deportation.

What is the Philippine government doing? It's crazy.
The Philippine government should protest the Japanese government
and demand their "recovery of honor" and reparations.

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor with Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .2019-05-20:Dear Sirs, the Chinese government should rescue Chinese. The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation". It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-05-20:Dear Sirs, the Chinese government should rescue Chinese.
The first is a person who has violated Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act in Japan.
And the second is a Chinese who has nothing to do with "illegal labor".
He was punishable under the "Criminal Code".
The name of the offense is Article 60 and Article 62 "sin of aiding" of the "Criminal Code"
against Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
The Chinese government "wake up"!

Part 1. As described in the second part below, I "appeal" two things.
First, Chinese foreign students graduated from a Japanese university
and renewed their status of residence to join my company, Lefco.
The status of residence is "technology" or "interrogation international".
There was a Lehman shock in the fall of 2008.
So I canceled the Chinese hiring.
The four Chinese did not work for the status of residence, but each worked at a restaurant.
So they were arrested for violation of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
It is a fact that they have violated Section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.

Article 70 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with or without work for not more than 3 years
or a fine not excluded 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporition with or without work and a fine.
(iv) A person who is clearly found to be engaged in a related
in activities related to management of business involving income or activities
for which he / she has received reward in violation of the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (1).

I saw "Report of interrogation" of "4 Chinese".
Three employers have not confirmed "Visa".
One person was a "forged visa".
The employer says. "I know it's a" forged visa "if you look closely."
None of the four Chinese employers have been arrested under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.

Article 73-2 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years or a fine not excluding 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporisonment and a fine.
(i) A person who has had an alien engage in illegal work in connection with business activities.

So I insist that only foreigners are "arbitrarily" "punished"
and therefore "violate international law".
If the prosecutor's office does not "punish" the employer
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act at his discretion, the violator
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Control Act is also "innocent."
As you think that there is "objection" about this "view", please let us know your "opinion".

In the United States, 16 million "illegal immigrants" do "illegal labor".
In the United States, "illegal immigrants" are "illegal residents".
"Employers" who employ "foreigners who are not eligible to work"
under the American Immigration Control Act will be punished.
In the United States, "illegal immigration" works with "forged visas".
So "employers" say they did not know they were "foreigners who are not eligible to work".
The same is true in Japan.
In such a case, Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act does not apply to the “Modified Immigration Control Act”.

The American problem and the violation of Article 70 (4)
of Japan's Immigration Control Act are different levels.
One, Chinese have "regular stay visa".
They are not "illegal immigrants" who entered Japan illegally.

Even in Japan, if a foreigner whose visa is overdue (overstay) illegally works,
he will be forced to leave without punishment.
Unfortunately the Chinese had a "official visa".

The "illegal labor" and "illegal immigration" issues are not unique to Japan.
After understanding this, please consider the Chinese innocence.

I have repeatedly sent letters and emails to the Chinese government.
I'm also emailing Chinese media.
The Chinese people "are not only Faway's CFO!"
The Chinese government should help the poor!

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump I have repeatedly sent letters and emails to the Chinese government. I'm also emailing Chinese media. The Chinese people "are not only Faway's CFO!" The Chinese government should help the poor!

To President Trump


At the Japan-US Summit Meeting at the end of May and the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-05-20:Dear Sirs, the Chinese government should rescue Chinese.
The first is a person who has violated Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act in Japan.
And the second is a Chinese who has nothing to do with "illegal labor".
He was punishable under the "Criminal Code".
The name of the offense is Article 60 and Article 62 "sin of aiding" of the "Criminal Code"
against Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
The Chinese government "wake up"!

Part 1. As described in the second part below, I "appeal" two things.
First, Chinese foreign students graduated from a Japanese university
and renewed their status of residence to join my company, Lefco.
The status of residence is "technology" or "interrogation international".
There was a Lehman shock in the fall of 2008.
So I canceled the Chinese hiring.
The four Chinese did not work for the status of residence, but each worked at a restaurant.
So they were arrested for violation of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
It is a fact that they have violated Section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.

Article 70 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with or without work for not more than 3 years
or a fine not excluded 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporition with or without work and a fine.
(iv) A person who is clearly found to be engaged in a related
in activities related to management of business involving income or activities
for which he / she has received reward in violation of the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (1).

I saw "Report of interrogation" of "4 Chinese".
Three employers have not confirmed "Visa".
One person was a "forged visa".
The employer says. "I know it's a" forged visa "if you look closely."
None of the four Chinese employers have been arrested under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.

Article 73-2 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years or a fine not excluding 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporisonment and a fine.
(i) A person who has had an alien engage in illegal work in connection with business activities.

So I insist that only foreigners are "arbitrarily" "punished"
and therefore "violate international law".
If the prosecutor's office does not "punish" the employer
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act at his discretion, the violator
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Control Act is also "innocent."
As you think that there is "objection" about this "view", please let us know your "opinion".

In the United States, 16 million "illegal immigrants" do "illegal labor".
In the United States, "illegal immigrants" are "illegal residents".
"Employers" who employ "foreigners who are not eligible to work"
under the American Immigration Control Act will be punished.
In the United States, "illegal immigration" works with "forged visas".
So "employers" say they did not know they were "foreigners who are not eligible to work".
The same is true in Japan.
In such a case, Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act does not apply to the “Modified Immigration Control Act”.

The American problem and the violation of Article 70 (4)
of Japan's Immigration Control Act are different levels.
One, Chinese have "regular stay visa".
They are not "illegal immigrants" who entered Japan illegally.

Even in Japan, if a foreigner whose visa is overdue (overstay) illegally works,
he will be forced to leave without punishment.
Unfortunately the Chinese had a "official visa".

The "illegal labor" and "illegal immigration" issues are not unique to Japan.
After understanding this, please consider the Chinese innocence.

I have repeatedly sent letters and emails to the Chinese government.
I'm also emailing Chinese media.
The Chinese people "are not only Faway's CFO!"
The Chinese government should help the poor!

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-05-20:Chers Messieurs, le gouvernement chinois devrait sauver les Chinois. Le premier est une personne qui a violé l’article 70 (4) de la loi sur l’immigration au Japon. Et le second est un Chinois qui n'a rien à voir avec le "travail illégal". Il était punissable en vertu du "Code pénal". Le nom de l'infraction est l'article 60 et l'article 62 "péché d'assistance" du "Code pénal" contre la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70 (4). Le gouvernement chinois se "réveille"!

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-05-20:Chers Messieurs, le gouvernement chinois devrait sauver les Chinois.
Le premier est une personne qui a violé l’article 70 (4) de la loi sur l’immigration au Japon.
Et le second est un Chinois qui n'a rien à voir avec le "travail illégal".
Il était punissable en vertu du "Code pénal".
Le nom de l'infraction est l'article 60 et l'article 62 "péché d'assistance" du "Code pénal" contre la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70 (4).
Le gouvernement chinois se "réveille"!


Partie 1 Comme décrit dans la deuxième partie ci-dessous, je "fais appel" de deux choses.
Tout d'abord, les étudiants chinois d'origine étrangère sont diplômés des universités japonaises.
Le statut de résidence a été renouvelé afin de rejoindre ma société, Lefco.
Le statut de résidence est "technologie" ou "interrogation internationale".
Il y a eu un choc Lehman à l'automne 2008.
J'ai donc annulé l'embauche de Chinois.
Les quatre Chinois ne travaillaient pas pour le statut de résidence, mais travaillaient chacun dans un restaurant.
Ils ont donc été arrêtés pour violation de l'article 70 (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.
C'est un fait qu'ils ont violé le paragraphe 70 (4) de la loi sur l'immigration.

Article 70 (1) Toute personne relevant de l'un des éléments suivants est punie
avec emprisonnement avec ou sans travail pour pas plus de 3 ans
ou une amende n'excédant pas 3 millions de yens,
ou sont passibles d'une peine d'emprisonnement avec ou sans travail et d'une amende.
(iv) Une personne qui est clairement jugée être engagée uniquement
dans les activités liées à la gestion des activités à revenus
r activités pour lesquelles il a été reçu en violation des dispositions de l'article 19,
paragraphe (1).

J'ai vu "Rapport d'interrogatoire" de "4 Chinois".
Trois employeurs n'ont pas confirmé "Visa".
Une personne était un "visa contrefait".
L'employeur dit. "Je sais que c'est un" faux visa "si vous regardez bien."
Aucun des quatre employeurs chinois n'a été arrêté en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Article 73-2 (1) Toute personne relevant de l'un des éléments suivants est punie
avec un emprisonnement avec travail de 3 ans au plus ou une amende de 3 millions de yen au maximum,
ou sont passibles d'une peine d'emprisonnement et d'une amende cumulatives.
(i) Une personne qui a eu un étranger s'est livrée à un travail illégal dans le cadre d'activités professionnelles.

J'insiste donc pour que seuls les étrangers soient "arbitrairement" "punis" et donc "violent le droit international".
Si le bureau du procureur ne "punit" pas l'employeur en vertu de l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration à sa discrétion, les contrevenants de l'article 70 (4) de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration sont également "innocents".
Si vous pensez qu'il y a une "objection" à propos de cette "vue", merci de nous faire connaître votre "opinion".

Aux États-Unis, 16 millions "d'immigrés clandestins" font du "travail illégal".
Aux États-Unis, les "immigrants illégaux" sont des "résidents illégaux".
Les "employeurs" qui emploient des "étrangers qui ne sont pas autorisés à travailler" en vertu de la loi américaine sur le contrôle de l'immigration seront sanctionnés.
Aux États-Unis, "l'immigration illégale" fonctionne avec des "visas falsifiés".
Les "employeurs" disent donc qu'ils ne savaient pas qu'ils étaient "des étrangers qui ne sont pas autorisés à travailler".
La même chose est vraie au Japon.
En pareil cas, l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration ne s'applique pas à la «loi modifiée sur le contrôle de l'immigration».

Le problème américain et la violation de l'article 70 (4) de la loi japonaise sur le contrôle de l'immigration se situent à des niveaux différents.
Premièrement, les Chinois ont un "visa de séjour régulier".
Ce ne sont pas des "immigrants illégaux" qui sont entrés illégalement au Japon.

Même au Japon, lorsque des «étrangers visas» travaillent illégalement,
Nous sommes obligés de "déporter" sans punition.
Malheureusement, les Chinois avaient un "visa officiel".

Les questions du "travail illégal" et de "l'immigration clandestine" ne sont pas propres au Japon.
Après avoir compris cela, considérez l'innocence chinoise.

J'ai envoyé à plusieurs reprises des lettres et des courriers électroniques au gouvernement chinois.
J'envoie également un courrier aux médias chinois.
Le peuple chinois "n'est pas seulement le CFO de Faway!"
Le gouvernement chinois devrait aider les pauvres!

Veuillez vérifier les lois d'immigration énumérées ci-dessus (en anglais) ci-dessous.
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a "puni" que les étrangers,
Je ne "punis" pas "l'employeur".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".
Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Étant donné que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans l’affaire de violation du contrôle de l’immigration, veuillez appuyer «l'appel» devant la «CPI».


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-05-20:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die chinesische Regierung sollte Chinesen retten. Der erste ist eine Person, die gegen Artikel 70 (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes in Japan verstoßen hat. Und der zweite ist ein Chinese, der nichts mit "illegaler Arbeit" zu tun hat. Er wurde nach dem "Strafgesetzbuch" bestraft. Der Name der Straftat ist Artikel 60 und Artikel 62 "Sünde der Beihilfe" des "Strafgesetzbuches" gegen Artikel 70 Absatz 4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes. Die chinesische Regierung "wacht auf"!

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-05-20:Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die chinesische Regierung sollte Chinesen retten.
Der erste ist eine Person, die gegen Artikel 70 (4) des Einwanderungsgesetzes in Japan verstoßen hat.
Und der zweite ist ein Chinese, der nichts mit "illegaler Arbeit" zu tun hat.
Er wurde nach dem "Strafgesetzbuch" bestraft.
Der Name der Straftat ist Artikel 60 und Artikel 62 "Sünde der Beihilfe" des "Strafgesetzbuches" gegen Artikel 70 Absatz 4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
Die chinesische Regierung "wacht auf"!


Teil 1. Wie im zweiten Teil unten beschrieben, "appelliere" ich an zwei Dinge.
Erstens absolvierten chinesische ausländische Studenten japanische Universitäten,
Der Aufenthaltsstatus wurde erneuert, um meinem Unternehmen Lefco beizutreten.
Der Aufenthaltsstatus ist "Technologie" oder "Vernehmung international".
Im Herbst 2008 gab es einen Lehman-Schock.
Also habe ich die Einstellung der Chinesen abgesagt.
Die vier Chinesen arbeiteten nicht für den Aufenthaltsstatus, sondern jeweils in einem Restaurant.
Sie wurden deshalb wegen Verstoßes gegen Artikel 70 Absatz 4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes festgenommen.
Tatsache ist, dass sie gegen § 70 Abs. 4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstoßen haben.

Artikel 70 (1) Jede Person, die unter einen der folgenden Punkte fällt, wird bestraft
mit Freiheitsstrafe mit oder ohne Arbeit für nicht mehr als 3 Jahre
oder eine Geldstrafe von nicht mehr als 3 Millionen Yen,
oder unterliegt der kumulativen Verhängung einer Freiheitsstrafe mit oder ohne Arbeit und einer Geldstrafe.
(iv) Eine Person, bei der eindeutig festgestellt wird, dass sie ausschließlich verlobt ist
bei Tätigkeiten im Zusammenhang mit der Führung von einkommensbezogenen Geschäften
r Tätigkeiten, für die er / sie unter Verstoß gegen Artikel 19 erhalten hat,
Absatz 1.

Ich habe "Verhörbericht" von "4 Chinesen" gesehen.
Drei Arbeitgeber haben "Visa" nicht bestätigt.
Eine Person war ein "gefälschtes Visum".
Der Arbeitgeber sagt. "Ich weiß, es ist ein" gefälschtes Visum ", wenn Sie genau hinsehen."
Keiner der vier chinesischen Arbeitgeber wurde nach Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes festgenommen.

Artikel 73-2 (1) Jede Person, die unter einen der folgenden Punkte fällt, wird bestraft
mit einer Freiheitsstrafe von nicht mehr als 3 Jahren oder einer Geldstrafe von nicht mehr als 3 Millionen Yen,
oder unterliegt der kumulativen Verhängung einer Freiheitsstrafe und einer Geldstrafe.
(i) Eine Person, die einen Ausländer im Zusammenhang mit geschäftlichen Aktivitäten in illegale Arbeit verwickelt hat.

Ich bestehe also darauf, dass nur Ausländer "willkürlich" "bestraft" werden und daher "das Völkerrecht verletzen".
Wenn die Staatsanwaltschaft den Arbeitgeber nicht nach seinem Ermessen gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "bestraft", ist der Verstoß gegen Artikel 70 Absatz 4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes ebenfalls "unschuldig".
Bitte teilen Sie uns Ihre "Meinung" mit, da Sie der Meinung sind, dass es "Einwände" gegen diese "Ansicht" gibt.

In den Vereinigten Staaten leisten 16 Millionen "illegale Einwanderer" "illegale Arbeit".
In den Vereinigten Staaten sind "illegale Einwanderer" "illegale Einwohner".
"Arbeitgeber", die "Ausländer beschäftigen, die nach dem amerikanischen Einwanderungskontrollgesetz nicht arbeitsberechtigt sind", werden bestraft.
In den Vereinigten Staaten funktioniert "illegale Einwanderung" mit "gefälschten Visa".
"Arbeitgeber" sagten, sie wüssten nicht, dass sie "Ausländer sind, die nicht arbeitsberechtigt sind".
Das gilt auch für Japan.
In einem solchen Fall gilt Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes nicht für das „modifizierte Einwanderungskontrollgesetz“.

Das amerikanische Problem und die Verletzung von Artikel 70 Absatz 4 des japanischen Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes sind unterschiedlich.
Erstens haben Chinesen ein "reguläres Aufenthaltsvisum".
Sie sind keine "illegalen Einwanderer", die illegal nach Japan eingereist sind.

Selbst in Japan, wenn "ausländisches Visum" Ausländer illegal arbeiten,
Wir sind gezwungen, ohne Bestrafung "abzuschieben".
Leider hatten die Chinesen ein "offizielles Visum".

Die Themen "illegale Arbeit" und "illegale Einwanderung" gibt es nicht nur in Japan.
Wenn Sie dies verstanden haben, bedenken Sie bitte die chinesische Unschuld.

Ich habe wiederholt Briefe und E-Mails an die chinesische Regierung geschickt.
Ich sende auch E-Mails an chinesische Medien.
Die Chinesen "sind nicht nur CFO von Faway!"
Die chinesische Regierung sollte den Armen helfen!

Bitte überprüfen Sie die oben aufgeführten Einwanderungsgesetze (in englischer Sprache).
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1 Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer,
Ich "bestrafe" nicht den "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu "bestrafen".

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2 Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, stehen in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".
Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Da viele Ausländer im Fall von Verstößen gegen die Einwanderungskontrolle geopfert wurden, unterstützen Sie bitte den "Appell" an den "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister As described in the second part below, I "appeal" two things. First, Chinese foreign students graduated from a Japanese university and renewed their status of residence to join my company, Lefco. The status of residence is "technology" or "interrogation international". There was a Lehman shock in the fall of 2008. 2019-05-20:

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-05-20:Dear Sirs, the Chinese government should rescue Chinese.
The first is a person who has violated Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act in Japan.
And the second is a Chinese who has nothing to do with "illegal labor".
He was punishable under the "Criminal Code".
The name of the offense is Article 60 and Article 62 "sin of aiding" of the "Criminal Code"
against Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
The Chinese government "wake up"!

Part 1. As described in the second part below, I "appeal" two things.
First, Chinese foreign students graduated from a Japanese university
and renewed their status of residence to join my company, Lefco.
The status of residence is "technology" or "interrogation international".
There was a Lehman shock in the fall of 2008.
So I canceled the Chinese hiring.
The four Chinese did not work for the status of residence, but each worked at a restaurant.
So they were arrested for violation of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
It is a fact that they have violated Section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.

Article 70 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with or without work for not more than 3 years
or a fine not excluded 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporition with or without work and a fine.
(iv) A person who is clearly found to be engaged in a related
in activities related to management of business involving income or activities
for which he / she has received reward in violation of the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (1).

I saw "Report of interrogation" of "4 Chinese".
Three employers have not confirmed "Visa".
One person was a "forged visa".
The employer says. "I know it's a" forged visa "if you look closely."
None of the four Chinese employers have been arrested under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.

Article 73-2 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years or a fine not excluding 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporisonment and a fine.
(i) A person who has had an alien engage in illegal work in connection with business activities.

So I insist that only foreigners are "arbitrarily" "punished"
and therefore "violate international law".
If the prosecutor's office does not "punish" the employer
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act at his discretion, the violator
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Control Act is also "innocent."
As you think that there is "objection" about this "view", please let us know your "opinion".

In the United States, 16 million "illegal immigrants" do "illegal labor".
In the United States, "illegal immigrants" are "illegal residents".
"Employers" who employ "foreigners who are not eligible to work"
under the American Immigration Control Act will be punished.
In the United States, "illegal immigration" works with "forged visas".
So "employers" say they did not know they were "foreigners who are not eligible to work".
The same is true in Japan.
In such a case, Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act does not apply to the “Modified Immigration Control Act”.

The American problem and the violation of Article 70 (4)
of Japan's Immigration Control Act are different levels.
One, Chinese have "regular stay visa".
They are not "illegal immigrants" who entered Japan illegally.

Even in Japan, if a foreigner whose visa is overdue (overstay) illegally works,
he will be forced to leave without punishment.
Unfortunately the Chinese had a "official visa".

The "illegal labor" and "illegal immigration" issues are not unique to Japan.
After understanding this, please consider the Chinese innocence.

I have repeatedly sent letters and emails to the Chinese government.
I'm also emailing Chinese media.
The Chinese people "are not only Faway's CFO!"
The Chinese government should help the poor!

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano



PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally, respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case, please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-05-20:Dear Sirs, the Chinese government should rescue Chinese. The first is a person who has violated Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act in Japan. And the second is a Chinese who has nothing to do with "illegal labor". He was punishable under the "Criminal Code". The name of the offense is Article 60 and Article 62 "sin of aiding" of the "Criminal Code" against Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act. The Chinese government "wake up"!

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-05-20:Dear Sirs, the Chinese government should rescue Chinese.
The first is a person who has violated Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act in Japan.
And the second is a Chinese who has nothing to do with "illegal labor".
He was punishable under the "Criminal Code".
The name of the offense is Article 60 and Article 62 "sin of aiding" of the "Criminal Code"
against Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
The Chinese government "wake up"!

Part 1. As described in the second part below, I "appeal" two things.
First, Chinese foreign students graduated from a Japanese university
and renewed their status of residence to join my company, Lefco.
The status of residence is "technology" or "interrogation international".
There was a Lehman shock in the fall of 2008.
So I canceled the Chinese hiring.
The four Chinese did not work for the status of residence, but each worked at a restaurant.
So they were arrested for violation of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.
It is a fact that they have violated Section 70 (4) of the Immigration Act.

Article 70 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with or without work for not more than 3 years
or a fine not excluded 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporition with or without work and a fine.
(iv) A person who is clearly found to be engaged in a related
in activities related to management of business involving income or activities
for which he / she has received reward in violation of the provisions of Article 19, paragraph (1).

I saw "Report of interrogation" of "4 Chinese".
Three employers have not confirmed "Visa".
One person was a "forged visa".
The employer says. "I know it's a" forged visa "if you look closely."
None of the four Chinese employers have been arrested under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Act.

Article 73-2 (1) Any person falling under any of the following items shall be punished
with imprisonment with work for not more than 3 years or a fine not excluding 3 million yen,
or shall be subject to the cumulative imposition of imporisonment and a fine.
(i) A person who has had an alien engage in illegal work in connection with business activities.

So I insist that only foreigners are "arbitrarily" "punished"
and therefore "violate international law".
If the prosecutor's office does not "punish" the employer
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act at his discretion, the violator
of Article 70 (4) of the Immigration Control Act is also "innocent."
As you think that there is "objection" about this "view", please let us know your "opinion".

In the United States, 16 million "illegal immigrants" do "illegal labor".
In the United States, "illegal immigrants" are "illegal residents".
"Employers" who employ "foreigners who are not eligible to work"
under the American Immigration Control Act will be punished.
In the United States, "illegal immigration" works with "forged visas".
So "employers" say they did not know they were "foreigners who are not eligible to work".
The same is true in Japan.
In such a case, Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act does not apply to the “Modified Immigration Control Act”.

The American problem and the violation of Article 70 (4)
of Japan's Immigration Control Act are different levels.
One, Chinese have "regular stay visa".
They are not "illegal immigrants" who entered Japan illegally.

Even in Japan, if a foreigner whose visa is overdue (overstay) illegally works,
he will be forced to leave without punishment.
Unfortunately the Chinese had a "official visa".

The "illegal labor" and "illegal immigration" issues are not unique to Japan.
After understanding this, please consider the Chinese innocence.

I have repeatedly sent letters and emails to the Chinese government.
I'm also emailing Chinese media.
The Chinese people "are not only Faway's CFO!"
The Chinese government should help the poor!

Please check the immigration laws listed above (in English) below.

Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it by terrorism.
But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" have no causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To everyone in the world. Sunday, May 19, 2019 Special Edition Sunday Edition: Greetings. Xi Jinping Jintao will implement measures to create a "new UN". Japan is doing "to compare and contrast two alternatives" diplomacy between China and the United States. The idea of ​​East Asian countries is the same. President Trump is not aware yet.

To everyone in the world.

Sunday, May 19, 2019 Special Edition Sunday Edition:

Greetings. Xi Jinping Jintao will implement measures to create a "new UN". Japan is doing "to compare and contrast two alternatives" diplomacy between China and the United States. The idea of ​​East Asian countries is the same. President Trump is not aware yet.

Part 1. China seems to have studied the details of the Japan-US trade war.

So it seems that China has given up on trade negotiations, resisting the move of the United States to smash "China Production 2025". China has a strong force called The Belt and Road Initiative.

Only one measure can win this Chinese strategy.

America is to become the factory of the world again.

Suppose that the United States has built a "special zone" on the American side of the Mexican border.

Suppose that a factory in the "special zone" can employ "temporary immigration" with a low wage of "mexico grade".

However, I think that there are few production engineers and skilled workers in the United States.

In the "special zone" factory, it is first necessary to collect production engineers and skilled workers from all over the world from all over the world.

Production equipment "purchase" the "latest equipment".

Many American companies and companies in "Allied countries" build factories in "special zones".

I think this construction will last for decades.

US companies, Japanese and European companies, thrive on "demand" such as "materials for construction" in "special zones" and "equipment equipment in factories".

In the "early" of the "special zone", many of the "temporary immigrants" work as construction workers.

The purchase amount of consumer goods purchased by "temporary immigration" will enrich the US economy.

Imports from China have robbed US workers of their work.

"Unauthorized migration" still does not rob the workers of the United States.

President Donald Trump just says, "They are criminals."

"Special zones" are "zones" mainly to return production from China and other countries to the United States.

Therefore, it does not rob the workers of the United States.

Products produced in the "special zone" are mainly labor-intensive assembly products.

Parts for assembly are purchased from conventional plants in the United States.

Therefore, transferring production from China to the United States will increase the work of American workers.

For that purpose, what a US "business owner" should do is "Scrap & Build" of factory equipment.

For example, “Steel materials” shipped to automobile factories in “Special Zones” must be cheap and good quality “Steel materials”.

I think that "Rust Belt's Steel Factory" will be reborn by "Scrap & Build".

Allies cooperate and thrive on the "special zone".

The "special zones" built in European countries are the same as the "special zones" in the United States.

By doing this, I believe that allies will again be able to co-exist with the United States.

If President Donald Trump does not carry out, expect it to be the next president.

We need a "zone" to protect freedom and democracy, not for President Donald Trump.

Part 2. We propose to build "special zones" in each country, including Europe.

Please read along with the proposal for the United States (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see.

The prosperity of each country is realized by the freedom, democracy and "ruled under the law" of the world.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please direct the concerned parties to investigate.

Materials submitted to the ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose the name http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/　　and the required items.

If you have any questions please email me.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Dear Sirs International people. Sunday version, 19 May 2019: Dear Sirs, Do you know the truth that North Korea's top leader Kim Jong-un is the “son” of the Japanese abductee “Yokota Megumi” and the two were a parent-child relationship? "True or false" is unknown to me. However, please "know" that there is such information.

Dear Sirs International people.


Sunday version, 19 May 2019:
Dear Sirs, Do you know the truth that
North Korea's top leader Kim Jong-un is the “son” of the Japanese abductee “Yokota Megumi”
and the two were a parent-child relationship?
"True or false" is unknown to me.
However, please "know" that there is such information.


Part 1. Is this information fake?
There is a lot of such information. However,
it is not reported in major media.

Please see the following site as an example.
https://ipip.awakening-wave.info/kim-jongun-yokota-megumi/

I will introduce some of this.
The truth of North Korea's abduction issue
There is a "Done with a Missing Persons Study Group" and a "Sponsor of Blue Ribbon",
and its representative, Mr. Kazuhiro Araki, is making a shocking statement.

Video: Araki Kazuhiro
[New verification! The abduction site of Megumi Yokota is a different place!
The Japanese government was hiding North Korea's "abduction"!

This time, "Kazuhiro Araki" explains "Verification"
of "The abduction site" of "Megumi Yokota".
He says that the Japanese government had already been "hiding" the "abduction
of North Korea" from that time.
He seems to be the one who is working on solving the North Korean abduction issue.
He is "considered" based on field verification with "credibility".
"A politician who is an agent" who originally said "There is no abduction
of North Korea" was helping to hide the facts.

The families of the abductees also have various positions,
and Toru Hasuike (note) has been issued books.
It is a book called "Abe Shinzo who killed abductees" and "Cold-blooded people".
I have not read this book, but I think the content is as the title.

Note: Toru Hasuike is a member of the abduction victims' family association
 (family association) former deputy representative of North Korea.
Brother of "Hasuike Kaoru" who was abducted by North Korea in 1978.
Some families of abductees seem to support Shinzo Abe.
It seems that Abe Shinzo seems to take advantage
of the abduction issue even though he has no intention of solving it.

I will not comment on this article.
The reason I introduced this article is
The Working Group, which examines the human rights situation in North Korea,
adopted a report containing 262 recommendations to North Korea on the 14th.
These include the resolution of the abduction issue sought
by Japan and the immediate return of victims.
It is because North Korea becomes a villain
at the pace of the Japanese government unilaterally.

While the Japanese government representative asked North Korea to solve the abduction issue,
North Korea reiterated its conventional stance that the issue has been resolved.
North Korea responds that all members have died as a result of the investigation.
The Japanese government has not died.
North Korea will hand over "Bone of the dead" by Megumi Yokota as proof.
The Japanese government says it is "fake bone".
Please see yesterday's email for this discussion.
We should know the truth.
The Supreme Court of Korea calls for Japanese companies to have a compensation
on the "wartime laborers problem".
The Japanese government claims that it has been settled
under the "Japan-Korea Basic Treaty."
East Asia is always a problem with “been resolved”.

Part 2. The Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office has "crushed"
the prosecutor's crime even in cases of immigration law violations.
There are many foreigners (innumerable).
Save the victims of the Japanese government around you around the world!
The victims are foreigners who "worked illegally"
in activities other than "Certificate of residence" in Japan.

They are arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act
and are subject to "criminal sanctions" such as "a prison term punishment"
and "a fine punishment". And they are foreigners who have been forced to repatriate.
I wrote this yesterday.

The prosecution has arrested third parties
for "supporting" the aforementioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is "I," Kin Gungaku who is Chinese ".
Other victims are officials from the Embassy of the Philippines and diplomats
from the Philippines.
I think there are more victims, but I do not know the information.
It is a third party who has handed out the “contract documents
for employment” to foreigners who have “illegal labor”.
It has nothing to do with "illegal labor."
The prosecution says in Indictment:

I gave a foreigner "Employment Contract Documents with False Content".
Foreigners were able to easily obtain the status of residence
by attaching “Employment Contract Documents with False Content”.
Foreigners came to live in Japan because they got “Certificate of residence”.
Foreigners were able to do "illegal labor" because they were in Japan.
So, as a crime against Article 70 "illegal labor"
of the immigration control law of foreigners,
"the crime that supported other crimes" of "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code" applies.

Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "Sins for Support"
against "illegal labor" is stipulated in "Sins promoting illegal work"
under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The "crime reasons" of the prosecution are stipulated
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act "Revocation of Status of Residence
by Filing False Documents".
There is no punishment for that. Only the status of residence is cancelled.
And "forced repatriation" will be.
Even if you get a status of residence with “false documents”,
if you work within the scope of status of residence, it is not “illegal labor”.
The application of Article 62 and Article 62
of the Penal Code to me and the Philippine diplomat is an error of the "applicable law".
This is the perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the governments and media of each country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "restoration of honor" and "reparations".
If governments and embassies can not protest the Japanese government,
request an investigation from the ICC.

There are many victims all over the world. Please support "Appeal to ICC".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translated document is incorrect,
please contact us by email.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano


For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp