To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims. If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines, the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-06-12:Dear Sirs, "The Philippines" has many victims.
If the government of the Philippines does not help the people of the Philippines,
the people of the Philippines should also study the Immigration Law of Japan.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of illegal labor related immigration laws.
(1) It is the "sin" of a foreigner who has illegal labor.
"Sins of unlawful labor" of Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be sentenced to imprisonment
or imprisonment of 3 years or less or a fine of 3 million yen or less,
or both the imprisonment or contraindication and a fine together.

1) A person who has entered Japan in violation of the provisions of Article 3
2) Those who landed in Japan without receiving permission from the immigration inspector
3) Those who have been canceled from the status of residence under the provisions
of Article 22-4, paragraph 1 (limited to items pertaining to item 1 or item 2) in Japan
Person who received designation of period by rule of 2 of Article 2 4 of Article 22 4
 (including the cases where it applies mutatis mutandis
 in Article 2 of paragraph 2 of 2 of Article 61); What remains in
(Illegal work by non-qualifying activities)
4) Activities that "does" only activities that run businesses with income
or activities that receive "remuneration" in violation of the provisions
of Article 19, paragraph 1

(2) It is a punishment of a person who illegally hires a foreigner.
Immigration Act Article 73-2 "illegal employment promotion crime"
A person who falls under any of the following items shall be liable to imprisonment
of up to three years or a fine of up to 3 million yen, or both.

(1) A person who has made foreign workers illegally work in business activities
(Ii) A person who has put it under his control
in order to cause foreigners to carry out illegal work activities
A person who holds an act of causing foreigners to engage in illegal work activities
or an act of the preceding item
«Revision» Flat 16 Law 073
・ "Don't delete 1 item" Flat 21 method 079
Persons who have conducted an act that falls under each item
of the preceding paragraph can not escape punishment under the provisions
of the same paragraph because they do not know that they fall under any of the following items.
But it is not this limit when there is no fault.
(I) The activity of the said foreigner is an activity to operate a business
with income that does not belong to the activity according to the status
of residence of the foreigner, or an activity that receives a reward.
(Ii) The foreigner has not obtained the permission under Article 19 paragraph 2
in performing the activities of the foreigner.
Iii The relevant foreigner shall be from Article 70, paragraph 1,
item 1 to item 2, item 3, item 5, item 7 to item 7 or item 7 to item 7,
item 2 to item 8 to item 4. Being "a person to raise"

(3) In the "basic", we are moving foreigners to their home countries.
Because it has been examined and entered in accordance with the provisions
of the Immigration Control Act, if it violates, it is only "to leave the country."
However, it is against international law if arbitrary "forced eviction" is carried out,
so Japan's position will decline in the international community,
so we need to be careful.

I will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "suing" two things.
This is an "international" human rights abuse committed by the Japanese government.
It will be nearly 10 years from the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "Honor Recovery and Reparations" will take place.
If the world ignores "rule under the law", it is natural to settle it
by terrorism. But it's crazy.

1. Foreigners carried out "illegal labor" other than "qualification of residence".
But foreigners are not guilty.
Only foreigners were punished for immigration control law Article 70 "illegal labor crimes".
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are "causal relationships" of unlawful labor
with Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act (a crime that promotes unlawful work).

However, Japan's judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" "employers".
This is clearly against the "rule of equality under the law"
And it violates international law that prohibits "punishing" only foreigners "arbitrarily".

If an employer who has illegally employed foreigners is "innocent",
then illegally worked foreigners are also "innocent."
If so, there is no "one who has assisted other crimes in criminal law"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, a diplomat from the Philippines,
and a Philippine embassy official" are not guilty.

2. Prosecutors "apply" "the crime to support other crimes" of Article 60
and Article 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the basis of "support of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act" It's crazy.
This is the logic of the law is wrong.

Foreigners have acted as stipulated in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by filing false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" for this.
The dispositions are "cancellation of status of residence"
and "deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, "Criminal Code Article 60
and Article 62" Sins to support other crimes "can not be applied.
The "crime reasons" of the Immigration Control Act 22-4-4 pointed out
by the "indictment" do not have a causal relationship with the Immigration Control Act 70.
Indeed, the logic of the law is wrong.

The Japanese government is crushing "prosecution."
But "crush" by the state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

To the Choson International Youth Travel Agency


Dear Sirs, Please send this e-mail to the top leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency".
This e-mail is sent daily to media, embassies and white houses in the world.


To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims
of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved
in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1: The entrance method is explained in the following section.
It was "promulgated" on October 4, 1951, and "enforced" on November 1 of the same year,
under the title of "Entry and Exit Control Order" as one of the "Pawdam command".

Under the provisions of Article 4 of the Act on Measures of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
 (Law No. 126 of 1947) based on the case concerning the order issued
 by the "Acceptance" of the Potsdam Declaration,
 the "Peace Treaty with Japan" Since the "Persistent Measures" were issued
 after "Effective Date" (April 28, 1952, April 28, 1952),
 "Laws and ordinances are effective" Are treated as having an effect,
 and all subsequent amendments are also made by law.
With the entry of Japan into the Refugee Convention and the Refugee Protocol,
the title was changed to the current one on January 1, 1982 (Showa 57).

The form is a government ordinance but the effect is equal to the law,
and the title of the title is "law" but not "law".
Normally, in the laws and ordinances, there is a provision concerning the purpose
and purpose at the beginning (Article 1), and in this context,
as the style that refers to the law itself,
"this law (ordinance) is aimed at ○○" This part
of the Immigration Control Law is indicated as "This Cabinet Order"
in the era of the Immigration Control Order, and "Immigration Control
and Immigration Control Law" after the title amendment is used.
And it is considered not to be labeled "this law" which can not be used unless it is a law.

As for the abbreviated terms, the fact that "entry and exit management"
and "refugee recognition" are "parallel" in the official title,
and that there is no "inevitability"
in the article on refugees, Etc. ", the term" immigration law "refers to" many cases ",
but in the case of" official documents "of" other laws and regulations ",
the term" immigration law "is used as a general rule.
Actual immigration control is carried out by the Immigration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice,
the Immigration Control and Immigration Bureau, and the Minister of Justice,
the Immigration Inspector, and the Immigration Security Officer.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal"
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code
and Article 62 of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support
of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims
of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved
in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1: The entrance method is explained in the following section.
It was "promulgated" on October 4, 1951, and "enforced" on November 1 of the same year,
under the title of "Entry and Exit Control Order" as one of the "Pawdam command".

Under the provisions of Article 4 of the Act on Measures of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
 (Law No. 126 of 1947) based on the case concerning the order issued
 by the "Acceptance" of the Potsdam Declaration,
 the "Peace Treaty with Japan" Since the "Persistent Measures" were issued
 after "Effective Date" (April 28, 1952, April 28, 1952),
 "Laws and ordinances are effective" Are treated as having an effect,
 and all subsequent amendments are also made by law.
With the entry of Japan into the Refugee Convention and the Refugee Protocol,
the title was changed to the current one on January 1, 1982 (Showa 57).

The form is a government ordinance but the effect is equal to the law,
and the title of the title is "law" but not "law".
Normally, in the laws and ordinances, there is a provision concerning the purpose
and purpose at the beginning (Article 1), and in this context,
as the style that refers to the law itself,
"this law (ordinance) is aimed at ○○" This part
of the Immigration Control Law is indicated as "This Cabinet Order"
in the era of the Immigration Control Order, and "Immigration Control
and Immigration Control Law" after the title amendment is used.
And it is considered not to be labeled "this law" which can not be used unless it is a law.

As for the abbreviated terms, the fact that "entry and exit management"
and "refugee recognition" are "parallel" in the official title,
and that there is no "inevitability"
in the article on refugees, Etc. ", the term" immigration law "refers to" many cases ",
but in the case of" official documents "of" other laws and regulations ",
the term" immigration law "is used as a general rule.
Actual immigration control is carried out by the Immigration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice,
the Immigration Control and Immigration Bureau, and the Minister of Justice,
the Immigration Inspector, and the Immigration Security Officer.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal"
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code
and Article 62 of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support
of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-11: Chers Messieurs, Les médias de Philippe tombent toujours sur le piège à miel du gouvernement japonais. Media of the Philippines, pour aider le peuple philippin victime du gouvernement japonais, Les médias eux-mêmes devraient étudier la loi japonaise sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance des réfugiés.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-11: Chers Messieurs, Les médias de Philippe tombent toujours sur le piège à miel du gouvernement japonais.
Media of the Philippines, pour aider le peuple philippin victime du gouvernement japonais,
Les médias eux-mêmes devraient étudier la loi japonaise sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance des réfugiés.


Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié sur le site suivant:
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 Wikipedie décrit la loi sur l'immigration comme suit.
En tant qu’un des "ordres de Potsdam", le "titre" de l’ordonnance sur le contrôle de l’immigration "promulguée" du 4 octobre 1951 (Showa 26),
Il est entré en vigueur le 1 er novembre de la même année.

Sur la base d'une affaire relative à une commande "accompagnant" l'acceptation de la déclaration de Potsdam
Conformément aux dispositions de l'article 4 de la loi sur les mesures «des arrêtés du ministère des affaires étrangères» (loi n ° 126 de 1961),
Même après le "traité de paix" et la "date d'entrée en vigueur" avec le Japon (28 avril 1952)
Comme "les mesures de survie" ont été prises pour "être efficaces en tant que loi",
Le numéro de décret reste un décret mais est traité comme ayant l’effet de la loi,
Certaines révisions ultérieures sont toutes faites par la loi.
En raison de l'adhésion du Japon à la Convention sur les réfugiés et au Protocole relatif aux réfugiés, le 1er janvier 1982 (Showa 57)
"Titre" a été remplacé par le titre actuel.

Le formulaire est un ordre du Cabinet, mais l’effet est identique à la loi et le titre se termine par "loi" mais pas "loi",
Etc ont un processus spécial.
En général, dans la loi, au début (article 1, etc.), une disposition à cet effet est insérée.
En cela, il est écrit "Cette loi (ordonnance du gouvernement) vise à ○ ○" comme un style désignant la loi elle-même.
La partie pertinente de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration stipule que l'âge de l'ordonnance sur le contrôle de l'immigration
Après la révision du titre, la mention «Loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié» est utilisée,
Le nom et le fait ne peuvent pas être utilisés sans loi
On prend soin de ne pas écrire "cette loi est".

En ce qui concerne les abréviations, le titre officiel est que "contrôle de l'immigration" et "reconnaissance des réfugiés" sont "parallèles",
En outre, parce qu'il n'y a aucune "nécessité" d'abréger le mot "réfugié" dans un article sur la couverture médiatique des réfugiés
Dans les "nouvelles, etc.", il y a "de nombreux exemples", appelés "Loi sur l'immigration et le statut de réfugié".
Lorsqu'ils sont mentionnés dans les "documents publics" des "articles de l'ordonnance et autres", ils sont en principe écrits comme "la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration".
L’administration actuelle du contrôle de l’immigration est gérée par le Ministère de la justice, le Bureau de l’immigration, le Centre de détention pour immigrés et le Bureau régional de l’immigration.
Exécuté par le ministre de la Justice, l'inspecteur de l'immigration, le gardien de l'immigration, etc.

Je continuerai demain.

Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".
Les documents sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-11: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Philippes Medien stürzen sich immer noch auf die Honigfalle der japanischen Regierung. Medien der Philippinen, um dem philippinischen Volk zu helfen, das Opfer der japanischen Regierung wurde, Die Medien selbst sollten das japanische Gesetz zur Einwanderungskontrolle und zur Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen studieren.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-11: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, Philippes Medien stürzen sich immer noch auf die Honigfalle der japanischen Regierung.
Medien der Philippinen, um dem philippinischen Volk zu helfen, das Opfer der japanischen Regierung wurde,
Die Medien selbst sollten das japanische Gesetz zur Einwanderungskontrolle und zur Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen studieren.


Das Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen an folgender Stelle:
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. Wikipedie beschreibt das Einwanderungsgesetz wie folgt.
Als einer der sogenannten "Potsdamer Orden" wurde der "Titel" der Einwanderungskontrollverordnung am 4. Oktober 1951 "verkündet" (Showa 26),
Es trat am 1. November desselben Jahres in Kraft.

Gestützt auf die Angelegenheit im Zusammenhang mit einer Bestellung, die mit der Annahme der Potsdamer Erklärung "einhergeht"
Gemäß den Bestimmungen von Artikel 4 des Gesetzes über die Maßnahmen des "Ministeriums für auswärtige Angelegenheiten" (Gesetz Nr. 126 von 1961)
Auch nach dem "Friedensvertrag" und "Inkrafttreten" mit Japan (28. April 1952)
Da "Überlebensmaßnahmen" ergriffen wurden, um "als Gesetz wirksam zu sein",
Die Verordnungsnummer bleibt eine Verordnung, wird jedoch als rechtswirksam behandelt.
Einige spätere Überarbeitungen sind alle gesetzlich vorgeschrieben.
Aufgrund des Beitritts Japans zur Flüchtlingskonvention und zum Flüchtlingsprotokoll am 1. Januar 1982 (Showa 57)
"Titel" wurde in den aktuellen geändert.

Die Form ist eine Kabinettsverordnung, aber die Wirkung ist die gleiche wie Gesetz, und der Titel endet mit "Gesetz", aber nicht mit "Gesetz".
Usw. haben ein spezielles Verfahren.
Im Allgemeinen wird in der Satzung zu Beginn (Artikel 1 usw.) eine Bestimmung für den Zweck und den Zweck eingefügt.
Darin ist geschrieben als "Dieses Gesetz (Regierungsverordnung) zielt auf ○ ○" als ein Stil, der auf das Gesetz selbst verweist.
Der einschlägige Teil des Zuwanderungskontrollgesetzes gibt das Alter der Zuwanderungskontrollverordnung an
Nach der Überarbeitung des Titels wird der Vermerk „Gesetz über die Kontrolle der Einwanderung und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen“ verwendet.
Name und Tatsache können nicht ohne Gesetz verwendet werden
Es wird darauf geachtet, nicht "dieses Gesetz ist" zu schreiben.

Der offizielle Titel für Abkürzungen lautet: "Einwanderungskontrolle" und "Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen" sind "parallel".
Auch, weil es keine "Notwendigkeit" gibt, das Wort "Flüchtling" in einem Artikel über die Berichterstattung in den Medien über Flüchtlinge abzukürzen
In den "Nachrichten usw." gibt es "viele Beispiele", die als "Einwanderungs- und Flüchtlingsgesetz" bezeichnet werden.
Wenn in den "öffentlichen Dokumenten" der "Artikel der Verordnung und anderer" im Prinzip darauf verwiesen wird, werden sie als "das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz" geschrieben.
Die eigentliche Einwanderungskontrollverwaltung wird vom Justizministerium, der Einwanderungsbehörde, dem Einwanderungsgefängnis und der regionalen Einwanderungsbehörde verwaltet.
Aufgeführt vom Justizminister, dem Einwanderungsinspektor, der Einwanderungsbehörde usw.

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.

Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu bestrafen.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, haben keinen kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".
Die Dokumente sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims
of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved
in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1: The entrance method is explained in the following section.
It was "promulgated" on October 4, 1951, and "enforced" on November 1 of the same year,
under the title of "Entry and Exit Control Order" as one of the "Pawdam command".

Under the provisions of Article 4 of the Act on Measures of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
 (Law No. 126 of 1947) based on the case concerning the order issued
 by the "Acceptance" of the Potsdam Declaration,
 the "Peace Treaty with Japan" Since the "Persistent Measures" were issued
 after "Effective Date" (April 28, 1952, April 28, 1952),
 "Laws and ordinances are effective" Are treated as having an effect,
 and all subsequent amendments are also made by law.
With the entry of Japan into the Refugee Convention and the Refugee Protocol,
the title was changed to the current one on January 1, 1982 (Showa 57).

The form is a government ordinance but the effect is equal to the law,
and the title of the title is "law" but not "law".
Normally, in the laws and ordinances, there is a provision concerning the purpose
and purpose at the beginning (Article 1), and in this context,
as the style that refers to the law itself,
"this law (ordinance) is aimed at ○○" This part
of the Immigration Control Law is indicated as "This Cabinet Order"
in the era of the Immigration Control Order, and "Immigration Control
and Immigration Control Law" after the title amendment is used.
And it is considered not to be labeled "this law" which can not be used unless it is a law.

As for the abbreviated terms, the fact that "entry and exit management"
and "refugee recognition" are "parallel" in the official title,
and that there is no "inevitability"
in the article on refugees, Etc. ", the term" immigration law "refers to" many cases ",
but in the case of" official documents "of" other laws and regulations ",
the term" immigration law "is used as a general rule.
Actual immigration control is carried out by the Immigration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice,
the Immigration Control and Immigration Bureau, and the Minister of Justice,
the Immigration Inspector, and the Immigration Security Officer.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal"
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code
and Article 62 of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support
of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

To everyone in the world's media　

2019-06-11:In order to help philippines who have been victims
of the Japanese government, the media itself has been involved
in the Japanese government's "Entry and Exit Control and Refugee Recognition Act" Do not study.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4

Part 1: The entrance method is explained in the following section.
It was "promulgated" on October 4, 1951, and "enforced" on November 1 of the same year,
under the title of "Entry and Exit Control Order" as one of the "Pawdam command".

Under the provisions of Article 4 of the Act on Measures of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
 (Law No. 126 of 1947) based on the case concerning the order issued
 by the "Acceptance" of the Potsdam Declaration,
 the "Peace Treaty with Japan" Since the "Persistent Measures" were issued
 after "Effective Date" (April 28, 1952, April 28, 1952),
 "Laws and ordinances are effective" Are treated as having an effect,
 and all subsequent amendments are also made by law.
With the entry of Japan into the Refugee Convention and the Refugee Protocol,
the title was changed to the current one on January 1, 1982 (Showa 57).

The form is a government ordinance but the effect is equal to the law,
and the title of the title is "law" but not "law".
Normally, in the laws and ordinances, there is a provision concerning the purpose
and purpose at the beginning (Article 1), and in this context,
as the style that refers to the law itself,
"this law (ordinance) is aimed at ○○" This part
of the Immigration Control Law is indicated as "This Cabinet Order"
in the era of the Immigration Control Order, and "Immigration Control
and Immigration Control Law" after the title amendment is used.
And it is considered not to be labeled "this law" which can not be used unless it is a law.

As for the abbreviated terms, the fact that "entry and exit management"
and "refugee recognition" are "parallel" in the official title,
and that there is no "inevitability"
in the article on refugees, Etc. ", the term" immigration law "refers to" many cases ",
but in the case of" official documents "of" other laws and regulations ",
the term" immigration law "is used as a general rule.
Actual immigration control is carried out by the Immigration Bureau of the Ministry of Justice,
the Immigration Control and Immigration Bureau, and the Minister of Justice,
the Immigration Inspector, and the Immigration Security Officer.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are "causal"
of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code
and Article 62 of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support
of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" . 2019-06-10:The government is still in the hell of the Japanese government Rodrigo Duterte President of the United States In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government, And the Refugee Recognition Act.

To the highest leader leader "Kim Jong-un Excellency" .


2019-06-10:The government is still
in the hell of the Japanese government Rodrigo Duterte President of the United States
In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government,
And the Refugee Recognition Act.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of the "embarrassed Incident" of the "Infringement of Immigration Law"
at the Philippine Embassy.
The "bill of indictment"
1) Describe the fact that a Filipino person engaged in illegal labor
in Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The embassy staff and the diplomat explain the fact that the "false documents" described
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law "Revocation
of Status of Residence" was "delivered".
3) The philippers who received the "False Documents"
of "False Documents" explain the fact that they "appended" the "false documents"
and applied the "application of status of residence" to the Immigration Bureau.
(Note) "False documents" means "False employment contracts".
4) As a result of this fact,
Filippin people became "labor punishment" by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor of activities outside the qualification".
5) Embassy officials and diplomats were punished for "support" of Article 22-4-4,
"cancellation of status of residence" under the Immigration Control Act.
Article 62 of the Criminal Law "crime to support other crimes" and "labor punishment".
(This is an error in the applicable law).
However, the foreign officer will return to the Philippines before being arrested.

In Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
the "status of residence" is revoked by the administrative disposition
by the Minister of Justice, and "withdrawal from the country of residence" is only permitted.
Penal disposition is not allowed.

An employer who employs a Philippine person falls under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act, which "promotes illegal employment" but is not disposed of.

Embassy officials and diplomats were found guilty of Article 62
of the Criminal Code "supporting other crimes."
The reason was to "support" cancellation of status of residence,
Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
This "disposal" is a cri- ery.

Prosecutors used the misconception that "general citizens and philippines" are "ignorance"
in the law.
The prosecutor has created a "third party" as a "supporter"
in place of the Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law,
"crimes promoting illegal employment".
The prosecutor made the "third party" as a supporter
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "out of the qualification"
for the reason of "supporting" the Article 22-4- (4) "revocation of status of residence".
The public prosecutor regarded the general public
and philippine as "unsuspected" even if the "third party" was a "sinner" as a supporter
of Article 70 of the violation of the Immigration Control Act.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal" of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code and Article 62
of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime" against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act (Acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano


To the highest leader Kim Jong-un Please request ***************************************

The North Korean government should "protest" the Japanese government.
The Japanese government should "solve" the abduction of foreigners.
There are many "victims" of "South Koreans" who are "Same ethnic".
Please protest the Japanese government by "representing" the people of the Korean Peninsula "!

North Korea should not launch missiles until the end of this year's election in Japan.
If North Korea "launches missiles," "The Abe administration will completely win."
Last time, North Korea "launched missiles" into the Sea of ​​Japan, so the "Abe administration had a" reverse victory ".

The weak point of the Abe administration is "the case of immigration law violation".
It is an "incident" of evidence that Japan is not governed under the law.

North Korea should announce that the Japanese government "illegally abducts and detains" foreigners.
North Korea should "publicize" that there are more "foreign victims" than "Japanese abductees."
North Korea should make the world's media "a friend" of North Korea.
Please announce the North Korean government in foreign media and the United Nations.
The North Korean government should specifically announce "my name". approve.


My information *********************************************** ****



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

************************************************** ******************

To President Trump At the G20 Osaka Summit in June, I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution" regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act". I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest and detention." Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone. 2019-06-10:The government is still

To President Trump


At the G20 Osaka Summit in June,
I would like Prime Minister Abe to "direct" "complete solution"
regarding "judicial administration in violation of the Japanese Immigration Control Act".
I am seeking "restoration of honor" and "reparations of property lost due to illegal arrest
and detention."
Also, please "solve" the wishes of Mrs. Carroll Gone.


2019-06-10:The government is still
in the hell of the Japanese government Rodrigo Duterte President of the United States
In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government,
And the Refugee Recognition Act.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of the "embarrassed Incident" of the "Infringement of Immigration Law"
at the Philippine Embassy.
The "bill of indictment"
1) Describe the fact that a Filipino person engaged in illegal labor
in Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The embassy staff and the diplomat explain the fact that the "false documents" described
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law "Revocation
of Status of Residence" was "delivered".
3) The philippers who received the "False Documents"
of "False Documents" explain the fact that they "appended" the "false documents"
and applied the "application of status of residence" to the Immigration Bureau.
(Note) "False documents" means "False employment contracts".
4) As a result of this fact,
Filippin people became "labor punishment" by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor of activities outside the qualification".
5) Embassy officials and diplomats were punished for "support" of Article 22-4-4,
"cancellation of status of residence" under the Immigration Control Act.
Article 62 of the Criminal Law "crime to support other crimes" and "labor punishment".
(This is an error in the applicable law).
However, the foreign officer will return to the Philippines before being arrested.

In Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
the "status of residence" is revoked by the administrative disposition
by the Minister of Justice, and "withdrawal from the country of residence" is only permitted.
Penal disposition is not allowed.

An employer who employs a Philippine person falls under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act, which "promotes illegal employment" but is not disposed of.

Embassy officials and diplomats were found guilty of Article 62
of the Criminal Code "supporting other crimes."
The reason was to "support" cancellation of status of residence,
Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
This "disposal" is a cri- ery.

Prosecutors used the misconception that "general citizens and philippines" are "ignorance"
in the law.
The prosecutor has created a "third party" as a "supporter"
in place of the Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law,
"crimes promoting illegal employment".
The prosecutor made the "third party" as a supporter
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "out of the qualification"
for the reason of "supporting" the Article 22-4- (4) "revocation of status of residence".
The public prosecutor regarded the general public
and philippine as "unsuspected" even if the "third party" was a "sinner" as a supporter
of Article 70 of the violation of the Immigration Control Act.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal" of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code and Article 62
of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime" against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act (Acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano



My information ***************************************************



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

***************************************************

Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-06-10: Chers Messieurs, le gouvernement philippin est toujours en train de tomber dans le piège à miel du gouvernement japonais. Rodrigo Duterte, président! Le président lui-même, afin d'aider le peuple philippin victime du gouvernement japonais, Étudier la loi japonaise sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-06-10: Chers Messieurs, le gouvernement philippin est toujours en train de tomber dans le piège à miel du gouvernement japonais.
Rodrigo Duterte, président!
Le président lui-même, afin d'aider le peuple philippin victime du gouvernement japonais,
Étudier la loi japonaise sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié.


Sur le site suivant,
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Vous pouvez consulter le texte intégral le plus récent de (Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié).
(Japonais et anglais)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Partie 1 Résumé de "l'incident embarrassé" de "violation de la loi sur l'immigration" à l'ambassade des Philippines.
"Acte d'accusation" est
1) Expliquez le fait que les Philippins ont appliqué l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration au "travail illégal d'activités non qualifiées".
2) Le personnel des ambassades et les diplomates exercent le contrôle de l'immigration, article 22-4-4.
Expliquez le fait que vous avez "émis" les "faux documents" répertoriés dans "Annulation du statut de résilience".
3) Les Philippines qui ont reçu la "concession" de "faux documents"
"Joindre de faux documents" au bureau de l'immigration
Expliquez le fait que "l'application" du "statut de résidence" a été effectuée.
(Note) "faux documents" est "documents contractuels du contenu avec faux emploi faux".
4) Par ce fait,
Les Philippines ont été condamnées à une "peine de main-d'oeuvre" en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration "du travail illégal pour des activités extra-qualifiées".
5) Le personnel des ambassades et les diplomates sont des articles de contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4
Elle est devenue la sanction suivante pour le motif de "soutien" de "l'annulation du statut de résidence".
L'article 62 du Code pénal "Péché pour avoir soutenu d'autres crimes" est "Punition du travail".
(Ceci est une erreur dans la loi applicable).
Cependant, les diplomates rentrent aux Philippines avant d'être arrêtés.

L'article 22-4-4 "Révocation du statut de résidence" au sens de la loi sur l'immigration est un acte administratif du ministre de la justice
Il n'annule que le "statut de résidence" et devient "l'expulsion".
Il n'y a pas de punition pénale.

Les "employeurs" qui ont employé les Philippines sont l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration
Bien que cela corresponde à "un crime qui favorise le travail illégal", il n’est pas éliminé.

Le personnel de l'ambassade et les diplomates sont devenus des articles de droit pénal au titre de l'article 62 "crime pour soutien d'autres crimes".
La raison en est "le soutien" de l'article 22-4-4 "l'annulation du statut de résidence" de la loi sur l'immigration.
Cette "disposition" est folle.

Les procureurs ont abusé du fait que "les citoyens en général et les Philippins" étaient "une ignorance de la loi".
La poursuite remplace l'article 73-2 de la loi sur l'immigration "Le péché pour promouvoir le travail illégal"
"Créé" un "tiers" en tant que "partisan".
Le ministère public a apporté son soutien à l'article 22-4- 4) de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, intitulé "Annulation du statut de résidence".
Une "tierce partie" a été désignée partisane de l'article 70 "Activités de qualification" en vertu de la Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Le procureur est partisan de l'article 70 "Activités de qualification" en violation de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
Même si "un tiers" est "un pécheur", je pensais que le grand public et les Philippins "ne savaient pas".

Je continuerai demain.


Partie 2 Je "poursuit" deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une violation "internationale" des droits de l'homme commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Ce sera presque 10 ans après l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre "recouvrement d'honneur et réparations" ait lieu.
Si le monde ignore "la loi", il est naturel de la régler par le terrorisme. Mais c'est fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un "travail illégal" autre que "la qualification de résidence". Mais les étrangers ne sont pas coupables.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, article 70, "du travail illégal".
La Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, en revanche, s'applique aux employeurs qui sont des "relations de causalité" de travail illégal au sens de l'article 73-2.
Je suis puni pour (un crime qui favorise le travail illégal).

Cependant, le système judiciaire japonais n'a "puni" que les étrangers, mais n'a pas "puni" les "employeurs".
Cela va clairement à l'encontre de la "règle de l'égalité devant la loi"
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui a employé illégalement des étrangers est "innocent", les étrangers illégalement employés sont également "innocents".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucun «auteur de crimes en droit pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, un diplomate des Philippines et un responsable de l'ambassade des Philippines" ne sommes pas coupables.

2 Le bureau du procureur a déclaré: «Soutien à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration»
Pour les articles 70 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
Il est "fou" d'appliquer "" le péché pour soutenir d'autres crimes ".
C'est la logique de la loi qui est fausse.

Les étrangers sont soumis au contrôle de l'immigration Article 22-4-4
Effectuer l'action prescrite dans (acquisition du statut de résidence en présentant de faux documents).
Cependant, il n'y a pas de "sanction pénale" pour cela.
Les dispositions sont "annulation du statut de résidence" et "expulsion à l'étranger" par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, "les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal" Les péchés pour soutenir d'autres crimes "ne peuvent pas être appliqués.
Les "motifs de criminalité" de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 22-4-4 mentionnés dans "l'acte d'accusation" n'ont aucun lien de causalité avec la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration 70.
En effet, la logique de la loi est fausse.

Le gouvernement japonais est en train d'écraser les "poursuites".
Mais "écraser" par le pouvoir d'Etat est "arrêter" de "Statute of limitations".
Les documents sont ci-dessous.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Emmanuel Macron a déclaré le président français.
Le gouvernement britannique devrait respecter les résultats du référendum.
Je suis d'accord avec l'affirmation du président Emmanuel Macron.
Parce que de nombreux étrangers ont été sacrifiés dans le «cas d'infraction à la loi sur l'immigration»,
S'il vous plaît soutenir "Appel" à "CPI".


Nous publions dans le programme suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Nagano Yoshihiro

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous si vous avez des questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-06-10: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die philippinische Regierung gerät immer noch in die Honigfalle der japanischen Regierung. Rodrigo Duterte, Präsident! Der Präsident selbst, um dem philippinischen Volk zu helfen, das Opfer der japanischen Regierung wurde, Studieren Sie das japanische Gesetz über die Kontrolle der Einwanderung und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen.

Angela Merkel an den deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-06-10: Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, die philippinische Regierung gerät immer noch in die Honigfalle der japanischen Regierung.
Rodrigo Duterte, Präsident!
Der Präsident selbst, um dem philippinischen Volk zu helfen, das Opfer der japanischen Regierung wurde,
Studieren Sie das japanische Gesetz über die Kontrolle der Einwanderung und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen.


Auf der folgenden Seite
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Sie können den neuesten Volltext des Gesetzes über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen einsehen.
(Japanisch und Englisch)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Teil 1. Übersicht über den "verlegenen Vorfall" einer Verletzung des Einwanderungsgesetzes in der philippinischen Botschaft.
"Bill of Anklage" ist
1) Erläutern Sie die Tatsache, dass die Filipinos gemäß Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes "illegale Arbeit an nicht qualifizierten Tätigkeiten" verrichtet haben.
2) Das Personal und die Diplomaten der Botschaften kontrollieren die Einwanderung nach Artikel 22-4-4
Erläutern Sie die Tatsache, dass Sie die "falschen Dokumente" "ausgestellt" haben, die im Abschnitt "Stornierung des Widerstandsstatus" aufgeführt sind.
3) Die Philippinen, die die "Bewilligung" von "falschen Dokumenten" erhalten haben
"Falsche Dokumente anhängen" an Einwanderungsbehörde
Erläutern Sie die Tatsache, dass die "Beantragung" des "Aufenthaltsstatus" durchgeführt wurde.
(Anmerkung) "falsche Dokumente" sind "Vertragsdokumente des Inhalts mit falscher falscher Beschäftigung".
4) Durch diese Tatsache
Die Philippinen wurden aufgrund von Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Illegale Arbeit für Aktivitäten außerhalb der Qualifikation" zur "Bestrafung der Arbeit" verurteilt.
5) Botschaftspersonal und Diplomaten sind Artikel 22-4-4 der Einwanderungskontrolle
Es wurde die folgende Strafe für die "Unterstützung" des "Status der Wohnsitzannullierung".
Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuches "Sünde zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" lautet "Bestrafung der Arbeit".
(Dies ist ein Fehler im anwendbaren Recht).
Diplomaten kehren jedoch vor ihrer Verhaftung auf die Philippinen zurück.

Artikel 22-4-4 "Widerruf des Aufenthaltsstatus" nach dem Einwanderungsgesetz ist eine Verwaltungsmaßnahme des Justizministers
Es löscht nur den "Aufenthaltsstatus" und wird zur "Abschiebung".
Es gibt keine strafrechtliche Bestrafung.

"Arbeitgeber", die Philippinen beschäftigten, sind Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Obwohl es sich um ein "Verbrechen handelt, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert", wird es nicht entsorgt.

Das Botschaftspersonal und die Diplomaten wurden strafrechtlich zum Artikel 62 "Straftat zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten".
Der Grund ist "Unterstützung" von Artikel 22-4-4 "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" des Einwanderungsgesetzes.
Diese "Verfügung" ist verrückt.

Die Staatsanwaltschaft missbrauchte die Tatsache, dass "Staatsbürger und Filipinos" "Unwissenheit im Gesetz" waren.
Strafverfolgung ersetzt Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungsgesetzes "Sünde zur Förderung der illegalen Arbeit"
"Erstellt" einen "Dritten" als "Unterstützer".
Die Staatsanwaltschaft unterstützte das Zuwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 22-4- (4) "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus".
"Dritte" wurde zu einem Befürworter von Artikel 70 "Ex-Qualifizierungsaktivitäten" im Rahmen des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes gemacht.
Der Staatsanwalt ist ein Befürworter von Artikel 70 "Ex-Qualifizierungsmaßnahmen", der gegen das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz verstößt.
Auch wenn "ein Dritter" "ein Sünder" ist, dachte ich, dass die breite Öffentlichkeit und die Filipinos "es nicht wissen".

Ich werde morgen weitermachen.


Teil 2. Ich "klage" zwei Dinge.
Dies ist eine "internationale" Menschenrechtsverletzung, die von der japanischen Regierung begangen wurde.
Es wird fast 10 Jahre nach dem Vorfall sein. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wir bitten um Ihre Unterstützung, damit unsere "Honor Recovery and Reparations" stattfinden.
Wenn die Welt "Regel unter dem Gesetz" ignoriert, ist es natürlich, sie durch Terrorismus zu regeln. Aber es ist verrückt.

1. Ausländer verrichteten "illegale Arbeit" mit Ausnahme der "Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes". Aber Ausländer sind nicht schuldig.
Nur Ausländer wurden nach dem Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Artikel 70 "Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen" bestraft.
Das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz gilt hingegen für Arbeitgeber, bei denen es sich nach Artikel 73 Absatz 2 um "Kausalzusammenhänge" illegaler Arbeit handelt.
Ich werde dafür bestraft (ein Verbrechen, das ungesetzliche Arbeit fördert).

Die japanische Justiz "bestrafte" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies ist eindeutig gegen die "Regel der Gleichheit nach dem Gesetz"
Und es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das es verbietet, nur Ausländer "willkürlich" zu bestrafen.

Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der illegal beschäftigte Ausländer hat, "unschuldig" ist, dann sind illegal beschäftigte Ausländer auch "unschuldig".
Wenn ja, gibt es niemanden, der "andere Straftaten im Strafrecht unterstützt" hat, gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes.
"Ich, KinGungaku, ein Diplomat aus den Philippinen und ein Beamter der philippinischen Botschaft", bin nicht schuldig.

2. Die Staatsanwaltschaft sagte: "Unterstützung für Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes"
Für Artikel 70 und Artikel 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes
Es ist "verrückt", "Sünde anzuwenden, um andere Verbrechen zu unterstützen".
Dies ist die Logik des Gesetzes ist falsch.

Ausländer sind Einwanderungskontrolle Artikel 22-4-4
Durchführung der in vorgeschriebenen Handlung (Erwerb des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Unterlagen).
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine "strafrechtliche Bestrafung".
Die Bestimmungen lauten "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Abschiebung ins Ausland" durch den Justizminister.
Daher können die "Strafgesetzbuch Artikel 60 und Artikel 62" Sünden zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten "nicht angewendet werden.
Die "kriminellen Gründe" des Immigrationskontrollgesetzes 22-4-4, auf die sich die "Anklage" bezieht, haben keinen kausalen Zusammenhang mit dem Immigrationskontrollgesetz 70.
In der Tat ist die Logik des Gesetzes falsch.

Die japanische Regierung zerschmettert die "Strafverfolgung".
Aber "vernichten" durch die Staatsmacht ist "stoppen" von "Verjährungsfrist".
Die Dokumente sind unten.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen Yasuhiro Nagano


PS:
Die Bundesregierung hat die japanische Regierung aufgefordert, die Todesstrafe abzuschaffen.
Vielen Dank als Japaner.
Weil viele Ausländer in der "Zuwanderungsrechtsverletzung" geopfert werden,
Bitte unterstützen Sie "Appell" an "ICC".


Meine Informationen *******************

Wir veröffentlichen im folgenden Programm.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/



Postleitzahl
Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano



Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns, wenn Sie Fragen haben.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister 2019-06-10:The government is still in the hell of the Japanese government Rodrigo Duterte President of the United States In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government, And the Refugee Recognition Act.

To Terrisa Mei British Prime Minister


2019-06-10:The government is still in the hell of the Japanese government Rodrigo Duterte President
of the United States
In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government,
And the Refugee Recognition Act.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of the "embarrassed Incident" of the "Infringement of Immigration Law"
at the Philippine Embassy.
The "bill of indictment"
1) Describe the fact that a Filipino person engaged in illegal labor
in Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The embassy staff and the diplomat explain the fact that the "false documents" described
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law "Revocation
of Status of Residence" was "delivered".
3) The philippers who received the "False Documents"
of "False Documents" explain the fact that they "appended" the "false documents"
and applied the "application of status of residence" to the Immigration Bureau.
(Note) "False documents" means "False employment contracts".
4) As a result of this fact,
Filippin people became "labor punishment" by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor of activities outside the qualification".
5) Embassy officials and diplomats were punished for "support" of Article 22-4-4,
"cancellation of status of residence" under the Immigration Control Act.
Article 62 of the Criminal Law "crime to support other crimes" and "labor punishment".
(This is an error in the applicable law).
However, the foreign officer will return to the Philippines before being arrested.

In Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
the "status of residence" is revoked by the administrative disposition
by the Minister of Justice, and "withdrawal from the country of residence" is only permitted.
Penal disposition is not allowed.

An employer who employs a Philippine person falls under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act, which "promotes illegal employment" but is not disposed of.

Embassy officials and diplomats were found guilty of Article 62
of the Criminal Code "supporting other crimes."
The reason was to "support" cancellation of status of residence,
Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
This "disposal" is a cri- ery.

Prosecutors used the misconception that "general citizens and philippines" are "ignorance"
in the law.
The prosecutor has created a "third party" as a "supporter"
in place of the Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law,
"crimes promoting illegal employment".
The prosecutor made the "third party" as a supporter
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "out of the qualification"
for the reason of "supporting" the Article 22-4- (4) "revocation of status of residence".
The public prosecutor regarded the general public
and philippine as "unsuspected" even if the "third party" was a "sinner" as a supporter
of Article 70 of the violation of the Immigration Control Act.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal" of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code and Article 62
of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime" against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act (Acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano



PS:
The UK should leave the EU unconditionally,
respect the referendum and show the example of the democratic nation to the world.
Since many foreigners have been sacrificed in the Immigration Control Violation Case,
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

To everyone in the world's media 2019-06-10:The government is still in the hell of the Japanese government Rodrigo Duterte President of the United States In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government, And the Refugee Recognition Act.

To everyone in the world's media　


2019-06-10:The government is still
in the hell of the Japanese government Rodrigo Duterte President of the United States
In order to help philippines who have been victims of the Japanese government,
And the Refugee Recognition Act.

You can check the latest full text of the Immigration Control
and Refugee Recognition Act at the following site:
(Japanese and English)
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail_main?id=173&vm=4


Part 1. Outline of the "embarrassed Incident" of the "Infringement of Immigration Law"
at the Philippine Embassy.
The "bill of indictment"
1) Describe the fact that a Filipino person engaged in illegal labor
in Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
2) The embassy staff and the diplomat explain the fact that the "false documents" described
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law "Revocation
of Status of Residence" was "delivered".
3) The philippers who received the "False Documents"
of "False Documents" explain the fact that they "appended" the "false documents"
and applied the "application of status of residence" to the Immigration Bureau.
(Note) "False documents" means "False employment contracts".
4) As a result of this fact,
Filippin people became "labor punishment" by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law,
"Illegal labor of activities outside the qualification".
5) Embassy officials and diplomats were punished for "support" of Article 22-4-4,
"cancellation of status of residence" under the Immigration Control Act.
Article 62 of the Criminal Law "crime to support other crimes" and "labor punishment".
(This is an error in the applicable law).
However, the foreign officer will return to the Philippines before being arrested.

In Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act,
the "status of residence" is revoked by the administrative disposition
by the Minister of Justice, and "withdrawal from the country of residence" is only permitted.
Penal disposition is not allowed.

An employer who employs a Philippine person falls under Article 73-2
of the Immigration Control Act, which "promotes illegal employment" but is not disposed of.

Embassy officials and diplomats were found guilty of Article 62
of the Criminal Code "supporting other crimes."
The reason was to "support" cancellation of status of residence,
Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
This "disposal" is a cri- ery.

Prosecutors used the misconception that "general citizens and philippines" are "ignorance"
in the law.
The prosecutor has created a "third party" as a "supporter"
in place of the Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law,
"crimes promoting illegal employment".
The prosecutor made the "third party" as a supporter
of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act "out of the qualification"
for the reason of "supporting" the Article 22-4- (4) "revocation of status of residence".
The public prosecutor regarded the general public
and philippine as "unsuspected" even if the "third party" was a "sinner" as a supporter
of Article 70 of the violation of the Immigration Control Act.

It will continue tomorrow.

Part 2. I "complain" about two things.
This is an international "human rights violation" by the Japanese government.
I am close to 10 years from the incident, and my life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our "honor recovery and compensation" will be done.
It is natural for the world to solve it in a ter- ror as long as it ignores "governance
under the law," but it is a cry.

1. An alien has committed an "illegal labor" other than a "residence permit."
However, the alien is innocent.
Only foreigners were punished by Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law "Illegal labor".
In contrast, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are "causal" of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(a crime promoting illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary "punished" only foreigners, but did not "punish" the employer.
This is clearly contrary to the "principle of equality under the law"
It also violates international law that prohibits "punishment" of "foreigners" arbitrarily.

If an employer who illegally employed an alien is "innocent",
the alien who was illegally worked is also "innocent".
If so, nobody has supported "other criminal offenses of the Penal Code"
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Law.
"I, KinGungaku, diplomat of Philippine country, Philippine Embassy staff" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is to "apply" Article 60 of the Penal Code and Article 62
of the Penal Code for "supporting crimes other than crime" against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Law on grounds of "support of Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act" Is a "cache".
This is the logic of the law.

The foreigner performed an act stipulated in Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act (Acquisition of status of residence
by submitting false documents).
However, there is no "criminal punishment" against this.
Dispositions are the "resumption of status of residence"
and "forcible deportation abroad" by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Article 60 of the Criminal Code and Article 62
of the Criminal Code "can not apply to crimes to support other crimes".
The "reason for the crime" in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Law pointed out
by the "indictment" has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The logic of the law is mad.

The Japanese government "crushes" the complaint.
However, "crush" due to state power is "stop" of "Statute of limitations".

The documents are as follows.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The victim is in the world.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media ******************************************

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information *************************************************

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

*****************************************************************