To President Trump
2019-10-07: Dear Sir,
I asked the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for "human rights relief support".
However, the “Japan Federation of Bar Associations” responds that they have no power to solve.
There are no lawyers in Japan who protect human rights.
So I am seeking support from the international community.
Governments in each country should take this issue seriously.
Part 1. This week, I will talk about the “abuse of authority
by special public officer” committed by the prosecutor of trial.
Around June 2014, the “trial prosecutor” was handed over
from the “prosecutor of the interrogation”.
The truth is the act of supporting the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4
“Cancellation of Status of Residence”.
But the prosecutor committed a crime like this.
1) Since the Filippins received “provided” “employment contract with false contents”
from the embassy staff (driver), they were able to obtain “residence status”.
2) Since the Philippine gained “residence status”, they were able to stay in Japan.
3) So the Philippines were able to “unlawful illegal work”.
Filipinos who were "in custody" at a police station
in Kanagawa were violated Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, the embassy staff (driver) was designated as a “supporter”
for Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Act.
"Criminal reason" is "support" for violation of Article 24-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
It is clearly stated in the law that the violation of Article 24-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative measure of the Minister of Justice.
This is not a crime.
However, the prosecutor illegally arrested and confined the embassy staff as a criminal.
Around June of the same year, the public prosecutor started a “trial”
with a false “bill of indictment”.
The prosecutor “Pressure” the embassy staff's “freedom of decision-making”.
The embassy staff was “arrested and confined” and “trial”. *
The prosecutor thought in this case.
He does not want to punish "employers" who hired foreigners illegally
under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
Only foreigners who have “worked illegally” would be punished
for charges of Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
The criminal motive is to punish foreigners for “work crimes” and earn “achievements”.
The reason for the crime is “support” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
The truth is the “administrative disposition” of “deportation”.
But,
“Support” in Article 22-4-4 “Cancellation of Status of Residence”
as an immigration law was criminalized.
He thought it was illegal but “no one doubts”.
“Support” for violations of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act was designated
as “Supporter” of Article 70 “Illegal Labor outside of qualification” as “reason for crime”.
The prosecutor thought.
Japanese are vulnerable to the law.
Anyway lawyers will not seriously defend.
No one will notice this “trick”.
It's a terrible crime that remains in the history of crime in the Japanese judicial circle.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
********
2019-10-07: Dear Sir,
I asked the Japan Federation of Bar Associations for "human rights relief support".
However, the “Japan Federation of Bar Associations” responds that they have no power to solve.
There are no lawyers in Japan who protect human rights.
So I am seeking support from the international community.
Governments in each country should take this issue seriously.
Part 1. This week, I will talk about the “abuse of authority
by special public officer” committed by the prosecutor of trial.
Around June 2014, the “trial prosecutor” was handed over
from the “prosecutor of the interrogation”.
The truth is the act of supporting the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4
“Cancellation of Status of Residence”.
But the prosecutor committed a crime like this.
1) Since the Filippins received “provided” “employment contract with false contents”
from the embassy staff (driver), they were able to obtain “residence status”.
2) Since the Philippine gained “residence status”, they were able to stay in Japan.
3) So the Philippines were able to “unlawful illegal work”.
Filipinos who were "in custody" at a police station
in Kanagawa were violated Article 70 "Unqualified Activities" of the Immigration Control Act.
Therefore, the embassy staff (driver) was designated as a “supporter”
for Article 70 “Illegal Labor” of the Immigration Act.
"Criminal reason" is "support" for violation of Article 24-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
It is clearly stated in the law that the violation of Article 24-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act is an administrative measure of the Minister of Justice.
This is not a crime.
However, the prosecutor illegally arrested and confined the embassy staff as a criminal.
Around June of the same year, the public prosecutor started a “trial”
with a false “bill of indictment”.
The prosecutor “Pressure” the embassy staff's “freedom of decision-making”.
The embassy staff was “arrested and confined” and “trial”. *
The prosecutor thought in this case.
He does not want to punish "employers" who hired foreigners illegally
under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
Only foreigners who have “worked illegally” would be punished
for charges of Article 70 “Unlawful Labor”.
The criminal motive is to punish foreigners for “work crimes” and earn “achievements”.
The reason for the crime is “support” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act.
The truth is the “administrative disposition” of “deportation”.
But,
“Support” in Article 22-4-4 “Cancellation of Status of Residence”
as an immigration law was criminalized.
He thought it was illegal but “no one doubts”.
“Support” for violations of Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act was designated
as “Supporter” of Article 70 “Illegal Labor outside of qualification” as “reason for crime”.
The prosecutor thought.
Japanese are vulnerable to the law.
Anyway lawyers will not seriously defend.
No one will notice this “trick”.
It's a terrible crime that remains in the history of crime in the Japanese judicial circle.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery
and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ********
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
********
