help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-08-29: Dear Sir, Looking at an article dated February 20, 2015 in the Yomiuri Shimbun, four Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act in June 2010 “Unqualified Labor”. This is exactly the same as the case where “I and Kingungaku” were “punished” under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code for “the crime of that support”. This is a “false charge”.
To President Trump
2019-08-29: Dear Sir,
Looking at an article dated February 20, 2015 in the Yomiuri Shimbun,
four Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
in June 2010 “Unqualified Labor”. This is exactly the same as the case
where “I and Kingungaku” were “punished” under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for “the crime of that support”. This is a “false charge”.
Therefore, we decided to indictment.
The prosecution has also “hidden” this “a letter of complaint”.
It is a completely vicious “judicial administration”.
Part 1. Organize the content of newspaper articles.
(1) Arrested in June 2014.
From March 2012 to June 2014 Three Filipino men
(35 years old to 52 years old) who worked illegally outside the status
of residence at a landscaping company.
The status of residence was a specific activity as a “servant of domestic work”.
The punishment is one year of “labor punishment”.
However, it is “3 year probation”.
Philippine embassy official (driver) who issued their false employment contract above.
The criminal law Articles 60 and 62 were applied
for the reason of supporting the immigration law 22-4- (4).
The punishment is “Labor Penalty” June 1st.
However, “4 years of probation”.
This is clearly a “false charge” due to an “incorrect application law”.
(2) November 2014 Requested visits to four other embassy staff
on suspicion of support under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
A diplomat (42) and three men and women (49-58 years old).
The reason for the crime against them is “support” in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Specifically, they provided “false employment contracts” to Philippine
who worked outside of the qualifications, and provided them
with “support” to obtain resident status. This is not a crime.
(3) There was an “answer” in December 2014. One person has returned to the Philippines
in July 2014.
The three diplomats returned to the Philippines immediately after the application (November).
(4) Therefore, on February 6, 2015, three persons were punished as follows
for reasons of violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The reason for the crime was the immigration law 22-4- (4),
and the following processing was performed in Articles 60 and 62 of “Crime of Support”
in the Penal Code
“Send the papers pertaining to a (criminal) case to the Public Prosecutors Office”.
The prosecutors are still committing crimes every day.
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
2019-08-29: Dear Sir,
Looking at an article dated February 20, 2015 in the Yomiuri Shimbun,
four Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
in June 2010 “Unqualified Labor”. This is exactly the same as the case
where “I and Kingungaku” were “punished” under Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code
for “the crime of that support”. This is a “false charge”.
Therefore, we decided to indictment.
The prosecution has also “hidden” this “a letter of complaint”.
It is a completely vicious “judicial administration”.
Part 1. Organize the content of newspaper articles.
(1) Arrested in June 2014.
From March 2012 to June 2014 Three Filipino men
(35 years old to 52 years old) who worked illegally outside the status
of residence at a landscaping company.
The status of residence was a specific activity as a “servant of domestic work”.
The punishment is one year of “labor punishment”.
However, it is “3 year probation”.
Philippine embassy official (driver) who issued their false employment contract above.
The criminal law Articles 60 and 62 were applied
for the reason of supporting the immigration law 22-4- (4).
The punishment is “Labor Penalty” June 1st.
However, “4 years of probation”.
This is clearly a “false charge” due to an “incorrect application law”.
(2) November 2014 Requested visits to four other embassy staff
on suspicion of support under Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
A diplomat (42) and three men and women (49-58 years old).
The reason for the crime against them is “support” in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act.
Specifically, they provided “false employment contracts” to Philippine
who worked outside of the qualifications, and provided them
with “support” to obtain resident status. This is not a crime.
(3) There was an “answer” in December 2014. One person has returned to the Philippines
in July 2014.
The three diplomats returned to the Philippines immediately after the application (November).
(4) Therefore, on February 6, 2015, three persons were punished as follows
for reasons of violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
The reason for the crime was the immigration law 22-4- (4),
and the following processing was performed in Articles 60 and 62 of “Crime of Support”
in the Penal Code
“Send the papers pertaining to a (criminal) case to the Public Prosecutors Office”.
The prosecutors are still committing crimes every day.
I think you can understand that Japanese judicial administration is in a “serious state”.
I ask everyone. Japan is a trading power.
There is only the “power” of the international community to solve this.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act
on the grounds of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
My information ******
Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
******
Comments
Post a Comment