help me Opinion To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-10-28: Dear Sir, The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This cause
To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister
2019-10-28: Dear Sir,
The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This caused young prosecutors to commit crimes and resist the Minister of Justice.
Part 1. The Minister of Justice can have an “immigration inspector
or immigration officer” conduct an “investigation of facts”.
The Minister of Justice can “revoke” the status of residence based on the results
of the investigation.
For details, see “Investigation of facts” in Article 569-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The police have the right to investigate, but in order to investigate,
it is a "case" where a crime can be guessed.
Of course, "criminal guess" is a legally "illegal act".
There is a report from the “citizens” that foreigners are doing “illegal labor” to the police.
However, the police cannot go into the "place" where they work and do an "investigation".
So the “police officer” goes to the “reported location” with the “immigration officer”.
“Immigration officers” can “examine facts” without making a “request”
for a “house investigation” to the court.
As a result of the investigation, foreigners are handed over to the police if it is illegal work.
However, "Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba" refused all police accompany.
This is to protect the human rights of foreigners.
If you are Japanese, you will not be able to conduct an “investigation” without a “writ”
from the court.
To do "investigation" means that "possibility of crime" is great.
If it is not a crime, it is a “big human rights issue”.
So I need a “permit” for “house investigation” from the court.
Why don't foreigners need a “license” for “house search”?
In Japan, foreigners do not accept these “basic human rights”.
So “Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba” refused to “accompany the police”.
What was “angry” to this was the “young new prosecutor”.
He "resisted" the "Democratic Party Administration".
This is the “reason why this incident” occurred.
Before the “2010 incident,” there was no such thing.
“Citizens do not know“ immigration law ””, so “judicial crime” was possible.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.
PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
2019-10-28: Dear Sir,
The 2010 violation of the Immigration Control Act occurred in the “Democratic Party Age”. At this time, the Minister of Justice was Keiko Chiba. She reformed the “Immigration Administrative System” at the discretion of the Minister of Justice. A major reform is the restriction of “right to investigate facts”. This caused young prosecutors to commit crimes and resist the Minister of Justice.
Part 1. The Minister of Justice can have an “immigration inspector
or immigration officer” conduct an “investigation of facts”.
The Minister of Justice can “revoke” the status of residence based on the results
of the investigation.
For details, see “Investigation of facts” in Article 569-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The police have the right to investigate, but in order to investigate,
it is a "case" where a crime can be guessed.
Of course, "criminal guess" is a legally "illegal act".
There is a report from the “citizens” that foreigners are doing “illegal labor” to the police.
However, the police cannot go into the "place" where they work and do an "investigation".
So the “police officer” goes to the “reported location” with the “immigration officer”.
“Immigration officers” can “examine facts” without making a “request”
for a “house investigation” to the court.
As a result of the investigation, foreigners are handed over to the police if it is illegal work.
However, "Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba" refused all police accompany.
This is to protect the human rights of foreigners.
If you are Japanese, you will not be able to conduct an “investigation” without a “writ”
from the court.
To do "investigation" means that "possibility of crime" is great.
If it is not a crime, it is a “big human rights issue”.
So I need a “permit” for “house investigation” from the court.
Why don't foreigners need a “license” for “house search”?
In Japan, foreigners do not accept these “basic human rights”.
So “Former Minister of Justice Keiko Chiba” refused to “accompany the police”.
What was “angry” to this was the “young new prosecutor”.
He "resisted" the "Democratic Party Administration".
This is the “reason why this incident” occurred.
Before the “2010 incident,” there was no such thing.
“Citizens do not know“ immigration law ””, so “judicial crime” was possible.
It will continue tomorrow.
Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.
Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174
Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.
But crazy.
1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.
2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds of “support
of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.
A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.
The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.
The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/
There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano
Yasuhiro Nagano
PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I expect no lies.
PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."
It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/
Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp
Comments
Post a Comment