Help me! 조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 최고 지도자 김정은 각하 2019-11-29 : 인사말, "뉴욕 타임스 등 미디어 '는 일본의 사법 제도를 거듭 비판하고있다. 일본의 사법 제도가 개

조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 최고 지도자 김정은 각하


2019-11-29 : 인사말,
"뉴욕 타임스 등 미디어 '는 일본의 사법 제도를 거듭 비판하고있다. 일본의 사법 제도가 개선되지 않는 한, 구미의 비즈니스맨은 일본에서 일을하는 것은 위험합니다. 나의 "입관 법 위반 사건」을 「특집, eature articles"하십시오. 오늘은 "일본은 법률을 이해하는 변호사가 없다"입니다. 나는 변호사에 내가 무죄 이유를 설명했지만 변호사는 이해하지 않았다.


제 1 부. 매일 편지를하고 있기 때문에 많은 분들이 사건의 악순환을 이해하고 있습니다.
"저와 중국인 KinGungaku", "필리핀 대사관 직원이나 외교관 '는 입관 법 70 조를 위반 한 자에
"허위 서류"를 제공 한 이유로 "형법 60 조 및 62 조"로 처벌을 받았습니다.
일본은 헌법 31 조에 따라 누구든지 법률에 근거하지 않는 체포 및 구금 그리고 처벌은받지 않습니다.
그러나이 행위는 입관 법 22-4-4 조를 '지원'하는 행위이기 때문에 범죄가 없습니다.
"허위 서류"에 「재류 자격」을 취득하는 행위는
법무부 장관의 행정 처분이며 입관 법 22-4-4 조에 명기되어 있습니다.
따라서 범죄가 아닌 행위를 지원해도 형법 60 조 및 62 조를 적용 할 수 없습니다.

이 것은 나의 변호하는 "변호사"를 전했습니다.
(구치소에 수감되어 있기 때문에 입관 법의 구체적인 '조항'은 말하지 않았다).
그러나 변호사는 "당신이 절차 론을해도 의미가 없다"고 말했다.
나는 변호사 "입관 법"의 "차입, insertion"을 요청하면 "성령"이 도착했다.
"변호사의 직무 기본 규정」에서는 「변호를받은 변호사"법률을 조사 의무를 말합니다.
변호사가 법률을 공부하지 않을 수 검찰관들의 범죄를 가능하게하고 있습니다.

교도소를 출소 후 "재심 청구"에 대한 공산당의 변호사했습니다.
그녀는 말했습니다.
"검찰은 기소장 적용하는 법률을 변경할 수 있습니다."
그러나이 사건은 "확정 된 사건"입니다.
이 변호사와 대화를해도 의미가 없다고 생각했습니다.

"원래 민주당"(현재는?)의 고문 변호사로도 상담했습니다.
사전에 내가 시의원을 통해 그에게 모든 자료를 제공하여 두었습니다.
나는 변호사에서 "해당 법률의 오류"의 답변을 기대하고있었습니다.
그는 말했습니다.
형법 64 조에 따라 '중국인'이 '노동의 형 "그래서 형법 60 조 및 62 조의 적용은"올바른 "입니다.
(이것은 "子供騙し"의 답변입니다).
참고 : 형법 64 조.
"긍정적 인 범죄자 '가'구속 '또는'과료, fine"이면 "교사, instigation"또는
"방조, Assistance"처벌을 "면제"하는 조항을 말합니다.

"이런 변호사"가 "공모 죄"의 "성립 '에 반대 한 것입니다.
"법의 논리 '도 이해할 수없는 고문 변호사를 안고있는 정당이 국회에서 논의 할 리가 없다.

"입관 법 위반 사건 '에서 일본의 경찰, 검찰, 판사, 변호사,
미디어의 범죄 사태를 특집하십시오.
내 메일을 수신 한 "지원자"는 일본 정부에 항의하기 위해 '힘'이 없다고합니다,
그러나 "그들"은 '힘'이되고 싶다 말한다.
그렇다면, 지원의 방법으로 다음 중 하나를 고려하십시오.
1) 「일본 정부에 항의서 '에'서명 '을하십시오.
2) 미디어 및 단체에서 "저에게 기부금」을 모집합니다.
"기부자의 수 '나'모금액"는 일본 정부에 '항의의 힘 "입니다.
3) 일본 제품의 불매 운동을하십시오.
일본인은 "타인의 불행은 꿀의 맛"이라고합니다.
일본인은 각각 '불행'이되어야 "법에 따라 통치"가 이해할 수 없습니다.
자세한 내용은 저에게 메일을주세요.

다음주에 계속됩니다.

아래의 "사이트"에서 "bill of indictment"를 참조하십시오.
이 사건이 "bill of indictment"을 본 것만으로,
당신은 "적용 법률의 오류"를 이해할 수 있습니다.

"영문 번역」과 「일본어 원문 'PDF 파일을 참조하십시오.
개인 정보의 취급에 충분히주의를하십시오.
● 영문 번역 "기소 letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
영문 번역은 참고입니다. 정확하게는 각자해야합니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● 일본어 원문 '기소 letter of indictment "
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
영문 번역은 잘못된 것입니다. 영문 번역은 위의 "PDF"를 참조하십시오.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● 관련 법률을 참조하십시오. (일본어 및 영문 번역)
1) 出入国管理及び難民認定法
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) 형법
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) 일본 국 헌법
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

제 2 부. 나는 두 가지를 "호소"있습니다.
"2019 년 11 월 4 일 개정"
나는뿐만 아니라 중국이나 필리핀 사람뿐만 아니라
세계의 많은 희생자를 위해 싸우고 있습니다.
사건에서 10 년 가까이됩니다. 내 생명에는 한계가 있습니다.
세계가 "법에 따라 통치 '를 무시한다면 테러로 해결하는 것은 당연합니다.

1. 외국인이 「재류 자격」이외의 「불법 노동 '을 실시했다. 그러나 외국인은 무죄입니다.
외국인 만 입관 법 70 조 "불법 노동의 죄 '로 처벌되었습니다.
이에 대해 입관 법은 불법 노동의 '인과 관계'인 고용주를 입관 법 73-2 조
(불법 취업을 조장 한 죄)로 처벌하고 있습니다.
그러나 일본의 사법은 외국인 만 "처벌"했지만 "고용주"을 "처벌"하지 않습니다.
이것은 분명히 일본 국 헌법 14 조 '법 아래 평등의 원칙'에 위배됩니다.
그리고 '의식'에 외국인 만 "처벌"하는 것을 금지 한 국제법을 위반하고 있습니다.
불법으로 외국인을 고용 한 고용주가 "무죄"이라면,
불법으로 일하게 된 외국인도 '무죄'입니다. .

2. 검찰은 "입관 법 22-4-4 조 지원"을 이유로
입관 법 70 조에 대하여 형법 60 조 및 62 조의
"다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄"를 "적용"했지만 "적용 법률의 오류"입니다.
"입관 법 22-4-4 조"는 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 사람의 처분입니다.
::::
기존 입관 법은 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자에 대하여
처벌의 대상이 없습니다 (구법 70 조, 74 조의 6).
허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자이를 방조한 회사, 변호사,
행정 서사 및 교직원 등의 신청 대행 사람을 처벌 대상으로 한 개정 입관 법 제 192 회 임시 국회에서 성립했습니다.
"2017 년 1 월 1 일부터 시행"되어 있습니다.
::::
"나, KinGungaku, 필리핀 국가의 외교관, 필리핀 대사관 직원"100 % "무죄"입니다.

"참고": 외국인이 입국 관리법 22-4-4 조
(허위 서류를 제출하는 것에 의한 status of residence의 취득)에 규정하는 행위를했다.
그러나 이에 대한 "형사 처벌"은 없습니다.
처분은 법무부 장관의 'status of residence 취소'와 '국외 강제 퇴거 "입니다.
따라서 「형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄 '가 적용되지 않습니다.
"기소"가 지적하는 입관 법 22-4-4 조의 '범죄의 이유'는 입관 법 70 조 및 인과 관계가 없다.

검찰은 "고소장, bill of indictment"을 "握りつぶす, crush something in one 's hand"하고 있습니다.
그러나 국가 권력에 의한 "crush something in one 's hand"는
"시효, statute of limitations"의 "정지"입니다.

자료는 아래에 있습니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

피해자는 세계에 많이 있습니다.
감사합니다. Yasuhiro Nagano

추신 : White House는이 문제에서 내가 만족하는 해결책을 진지하게 검토하고 나는 대답했습니다.
나는 결과를 기다리고 있습니다.
"거짓말이 없다"것을 기대하고 있습니다.

나가노 恭博


최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한의 말은 모두 믿을 수 없다.
그래서 '납북자'를 기인한다고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 아래에서 걷고 있습니다.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


세계를 움직이려면 중 하나가 필요합니다
"핵 미사일"또는 "거액의 돈"입니다.
"핵 미사일"에 집착하는 '김정은 각하'의 생각은 옳은 것 같습니다.
중국 말입니다.
"Without the trust of the people, there can be no government"
북한의 국민을 "중요한"합니다.


내 정보 

우편 번호 2610-0003
주소 Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
이름 YasuhiroNagano 나가노 恭博
휴대 전화
이메일


도와주세요.
불명 한 점은 문의 해주십시오.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! 2019-11-29：亲爱的先生， 《纽约时报》和其他媒体多次批评日本司法制度。除非日本的司法制度得到改善，否则西方

[中国人民！大家！请传播这个新闻！]今天的新闻。
中国人民不仅是“逃亡者”的“首席财务官”。
请帮助“可怜的中国人”。
香港，争取自由与民主！


中国政府应该“支持”被日本政府非法惩罚的中国人民。
许多来日本的中国人“受到日本政府的损害”。
中国政府应呼吁日本政府恢复荣誉和赔偿。
中网请以“​​传递”到“习近平总书记”。

以下是分发给当今媒体的内容。


2019-11-29：亲爱的先生，
《纽约时报》和其他媒体多次批评日本司法制度。除非日本的司法制度得到改善，否则西方商人在日本工作很危险。请把我的“违反移民法事件”作为“特色文章”。如今，“日本没有律师了解法律。”我向律师解释了为什么我无罪，但律师不理解。


第一部分许多人了解此事件的恶意，因为他们每天都会发送电子邮件。
那些违反《移民法》第70条的人是“我和中国KinGungaku”和“菲律宾大使馆工作人员和外交官”
我们因提供“虚假文件”而受到《刑法》第60和62条的惩罚。
根据《宪法》第31条，任何人都不得受到任何非依法逮捕，拘留或惩罚。
但是，此行为不是犯罪，因为它是“支持”《移民控制法》第22-4-4条的行为。
通过“虚假文件”获得“居民身份”的行为
《移民法》第22-4-4条明确规定，这是司法部长的一项行政安排。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条不适用于支持非犯罪行为。

我告诉了我我的律师。
（由于被关押，因此未在《移民法》中提及具体的“条款”。）
但是，律师说：“说程序理论是没有道理的。”
当我要求律师“插入”《移民法》时，出现了《部颁条例》。
在“律师职责的基本规则”中，“辩护律师”规定了审查法律的义务。
律师不调查法律这一事实使检察官有可能犯罪。

离开监狱后，我向一名共产党律师咨询了“重审要求”。
她说。
“起诉方可以更改起诉书适用的法律。”
但是，这种情况是“已确认的情况”。
我认为与这位律师交谈毫无意义。

我还咨询了“前民主党”（目前是？）的一名律师。
事先，我已经通过市议员向他提供了所有资料。
我期待律师回答“适用法律中的错误”。
他说。
根据《刑法》第64条，“中文”是“工作惩罚”，因此第60条和第62条的适用是“正确的”。
（这是“童年”的答案）。
参考：《刑法》第64条。
如果“积极犯罪者”被“拘留”或“罚款，罚款”
“免除”“协助”惩罚的条款。

这位“律师”反对“阴谋”的“确立”。
国会无法讨论甚至没有“法律逻辑”也无法理解律师的政党。

日本警官，检察官，法官，律师，
请在媒体上报道犯罪情况。
收到我电子邮件的“支持者”说，没有“权力”来抗议日本政府，
但是他们说他们想成为“力量”。
如果是这样，请考虑以下一种支持方法。
1）“签署”“对日本政府的抗议”。
2）请在媒体和组织中募集“对我的捐赠”。
“捐助者数量”和“资助金额”是抗议日本政府的权力。
3）请抵制日本产品。
日本人说“别人的不幸尝到蜂蜜”。
日本人除非变得“不高兴”，否则无法理解“依法治国”。
请给我发电子邮件了解详细信息。

继续下周。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人，
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。
但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果雇主非法雇用外国人是“无辜的”
非法工作的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《刑法》第60条和第62条与《移民管制法》第70条相对
“支持其他罪行的犯罪”的“适用”是“适用法律中的错误”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上，《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束（第70条，第74-6条）。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人，工作场所，律师，
在第192国会制定了修订后的《移民控制法》，该法律适用于行政干事和学校职员等行政人员。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100％“无辜的”。

“参考”：外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是，被国家权力“压碎某人的手”是
“老化，限制统计”中的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。
最好的问候。长野康广

PS：白宫回答我，我正在认真考虑可以使我满意的解决方案。
我在等结果
我希望没有谎言。

长野康广


*以下是发送给中国驻东京大使馆的电子邮件的内容


我不仅每天向日本，而且也向国际社会发送。
日本需要外国工人。
但是，除非解决了这个问题，否则外国工人不会来。
此外，公司不能安心雇用外国人。
请认真考虑这个问题。

中国政府应保护因违反《 2010年移民法》而受到非法惩罚的中国人。
我正在与日本政府斗争，以帮助“贫穷的中国人”。
人们不仅仅是华为的首席财务官！
习近平主席应该采取“人权穷人”的照顾。
你应该抗议日本政府。
您应该要求恢复荣誉和``赔偿''！
否则，在中国人民革命是必要的。

对华为首席财务官的非法逮捕抗议了加拿大政府。
然后，采取了对策。
然而，对于2010年的受害人“ Kin gungaku”，
100％非法逮捕，但未对日本政府提出抗议

“ Kin Gungaku” =金成研究。
他最初是延边的职业足球运动员。
他的父亲是延边共产党领导人。
中国政府是否放弃了强大的爱国主义共产主义者的家庭？

因违反《移民管制法》第70条而受到惩罚的四人为“汗”。
“非法劳动”不能仅由中国人来完成。
雇主非法雇用他们。
雇主不受《移民法》第73-2条的处罚。
他有意识地只惩罚了中国人。这违反了国际法。


当一名中国人被捕时，
我老婆给我打电话。
她说：“请帮助我的丈夫”。
我告诉我妻子
“您应立即与中国大使馆联系并说明情况。” “我很快就会被释放。”
然后妻子说。
“中国政府不会提供帮助。”
我以为，“大使馆成员”正在“坠入”日本政府的“蜜罐”。


如有任何疑问，请联系我们。
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp



我的信息

邮政编码2610-0003
地址日本千叶市Mihamaku
名字长野靖广
手机
电子邮件


如有任何疑问，请与我们联系！
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To President Trump Many people understand the maliciousness of this incident because they email every day.

To President Trump


2019-11-29: Dear Sir,
“New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several times. Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan. Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today, “There are no lawyers in Japan who understand the law.” I explained to the lawyer why I was not guilty, but the lawyer did not understand.


Part 1. Many people understand the maliciousness of this incident because they email every day.
“Me and Chinese KinGungaku” and “Philippine embassy officials
and diplomats” were punished under “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code”
because they provided “false documents” to those who violated the Immigration Act Article 70 received.
According to Article 31 of the Constitution, no one is subject to any arrest,
detention or punishment that is not based on law.
However, this act is not a crime because it is an act of "supporting" Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act.
The act of obtaining "Residence Status" from "false documents" is clearly stated
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act as administrative disposition by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code cannot be applied to support actions
that are not crimes.

I told this about my lawyer.
(Because it is imprisoned in custody, no specific “clause” in the Immigration Act is mentioned.)
However, the lawyer said, "It doesn't make sense to say procedural theory."
When I asked a lawyer for "insertion" of the "Immigration Law", a "Ministerial Ordinance" arrived.
In the “Basic Rules for the Attorney's Duties”,
“A defense attorney” states the duty to examine the law.
The fact that lawyers do not investigate the law makes it possible for prosecutors to commit crimes.

After leaving the prison, I consulted with a Communist Party lawyer for a “request for retrial”.
She said.
“The prosecution can change the law that the indictment applies to.”
However, this case is a “confirmed case”.
I thought it would be meaningless to talk to this lawyer.

I also consulted with a counsel at the “former Democratic Party” (currently?).
In advance, I had provided all materials to him via a city councilor.
I was expecting an answer from the lawyer to “Error in applicable law”.
He said.
According to Article 64 of the Penal Code, “Chinese” is a “work punishment”,
so the application of Article 60 and Article 62 is “correct”.
 (This is an answer for "Kid Childhood").
Reference: Article 64 of the Penal Code.
If the “positive offender” is “detained” or “fees, fine”,
it means a clause that “exempts” the punishment of “instigation, instigation” or “assistance”.

This “lawyer” opposed the “establishment” of “conspiracy”.
A political party with an attorney who can not understand even the "logic
of law" can not be discussed in the Diet.

Please feature the crime situations of Japanese police officers, prosecutors, judges,
lawyers, and media in the “Immigration Control Violation Case”.
The "supporters" who received my email say there is no "power" to protest the Japanese government,
but "they" say they want to be "power".
If so, please consider one of the following as a method of support.
1) “Sign” the “Protest against the Japanese Government”.
2) Please recruit "donations to me" in the media and organizations.
“The number of donors” and “funded amount” are the power of protest
against the Japanese government.
3) Please boycott Japanese products.
The Japanese say "others' misfortune tastes honey".
Japanese people cannot understand “governance under the law” unless they become “unhappy”.
Please email me for details.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-11-29: Monsieur, Le «New York Times et d’autres médias» ont critiqué à plusieurs reprises le

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-11-29: Monsieur,
Le «New York Times et d’autres médias» ont critiqué à plusieurs reprises le système judiciaire japonais. Si le système judiciaire japonais n'est pas amélioré, il est dangereux pour les hommes d'affaires occidentaux de travailler au Japon. S'il vous plaît faites mes «incidents de violations de la loi sur l'immigration» «articles de fond». Aujourd'hui, «il n'y a pas d'avocats au Japon qui comprennent la loi». J'ai expliqué à l'avocat pourquoi je n'étais pas coupable, mais l'avocat n'a pas compris.


Partie 1 Beaucoup de gens comprennent le caractère malveillant de cet incident, car ils envoient des courriels tous les jours.
«Moi et les Chinois KinGungaku» et «le personnel et les diplomates de l'ambassade des Philippines» sont ceux qui ont violé la loi sur l'immigration, article 70.
Nous avons été sanctionnés par les "articles 60 et 62 du code pénal" pour avoir fourni de "faux documents".
Selon l'article 31 de la Constitution, nul ne fait l'objet d'une arrestation, d'une détention ou d'une peine non fondée sur la loi.
Cependant, cet acte n'est pas un crime parce qu'il s'agit d'un acte de "soutien" à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
L'obtention d'un "statut de résident" avec un "faux document"
L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration stipule clairement qu'il s'agit d'une décision administrative du ministre de la justice.
Par conséquent, les articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal ne peuvent pas être appliqués pour soutenir des actions qui ne sont pas des crimes.

Je l'ai dit à propos de mon avocat.
(En raison de son incarcération, aucune «clause» spécifique dans la loi sur l'immigration n'est mentionnée.)
Toutefois, l'avocat a déclaré: "Cela n'a pas de sens de dire la théorie de la procédure."
Lorsque j'ai demandé à un avocat "d'insérer" la "loi sur l'immigration", une "ordonnance ministérielle" est arrivée.
Dans les «Règles fondamentales relatives aux fonctions du mandataire», «Un avocat de la défense» énonce le devoir d’examiner le droit.
Le fait que les avocats n'enquêtent pas sur la loi permet aux procureurs de commettre des crimes.

Après avoir quitté la prison, j'ai consulté un avocat du Parti communiste pour une «demande de nouveau procès».
Elle a dit.
"La poursuite peut modifier la loi à laquelle s'applique l'acte d'accusation."
Cependant, ce cas est un «cas confirmé».
Je pensais qu'il serait inutile de parler à cet avocat.

J'ai également consulté un avocat de «l'ancien parti démocratique» (actuellement?).
À l’avance, je lui avais fourni tout le matériel par l’intermédiaire d’un conseiller municipal.
Je m'attendais à une réponse de l'avocat à «Erreur de droit applicable».
Il a dit.
Selon l'article 64 du Code pénal, le «chinois» étant une «peine de travail», l'application de l'article 60 et de l'article 62 est donc «correcte».
(Ceci est une réponse pour "Kid Childhood").
Référence: article 64 du code pénal.
Si le «délinquant positif» est «détenu» ou «bien, bien»
Une clause qui "exempte" la punition de "Assistance".

Cet "avocat" s'est opposé à "l'établissement" du "complot".
Un parti politique avec un avocat qui ne peut pas comprendre même la "logique du droit" ne peut pas être discuté à la Diète.

Officiers de police japonais, procureurs, juges, avocats,
Veuillez présenter une situation de criminalité dans les médias.
Le "partisan" qui a reçu mon email a déclaré qu'il n'y avait pas de "pouvoir" pour protester contre le gouvernement japonais,
Mais ils disent qu'ils veulent être «pouvoir».
Si tel est le cas, veuillez considérer l'une des options suivantes comme une méthode d'assistance.
1) “Signer” la “manifestation contre le gouvernement japonais”.
2) Veuillez recruter des "dons pour moi" dans les médias et les organisations.
«Le nombre de donateurs» et le «montant financé» sont le pouvoir de protestation contre le gouvernement japonais.
3) S'il vous plaît, boycottez les produits japonais.
Les Japonais disent "le malheur des autres goûte le miel".
Les Japonais ne peuvent comprendre la «gouvernance conformément à la loi» à moins de devenir «malheureux».
S'il vous plaît écrivez-moi pour plus de détails.

Continuez jusqu'à la semaine prochaine.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
«Révisé le 4 novembre 2019»
Je ne suis pas seulement chinois et philippin,
Se battre pour de nombreuses victimes dans le monde.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).
Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Cela est clairement contraire à l’article 14 «Principes d’égalité juridique» de la Constitution japonaise.
Il enfreint le droit international qui interdit "consciemment" de "punir" uniquement les étrangers.
Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent"
Les étrangers qui ont travaillé illégalement sont également "innocents". .

2 La poursuite est due à "l'appui de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
"Applicable" pour "crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes" est "erreur de droit applicable".
"L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration" concerne les personnes qui ont obtenu le statut de résident par le biais d'une fausse demande.
:::::
Traditionnellement, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'appliquait à ceux qui avaient obtenu le statut de résident par de fausses demandes.
Il n'était pas soumis à une réglementation pénale (article 70, article 74-6).
Ceux qui ont obtenu le statut de résidence par une demande de falsification, le lieu de travail, un avocat,
La nouvelle loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, qui s'applique aux agents administratifs tels que les administrateurs et le personnel des écoles, a été mise en place à la 192ème diète.
«En vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2017».
:::::
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin et employé de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis à 100% "innocent".

"Référence": loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le procureur est "écraser quelque chose dans sa main".
Cependant, "écraser quelque chose dans sa main" par le pouvoir de l'État est
“Stop” dans “Ageing, statistiques des limitations”.

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.
Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche m'a répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution qui me satisferait avec ce problème.
J'attends le résultat
J'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mensonge.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-11-29: Sehr geehrter Herr, "New York Times und andere Medien" haben das japanische Justizsystem

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-11-29: Sehr geehrter Herr,
"New York Times und andere Medien" haben das japanische Justizsystem mehrmals kritisiert. Sofern das japanische Justizsystem nicht verbessert wird, ist es für westliche Geschäftsleute gefährlich, in Japan zu arbeiten. Bitte machen Sie meine "Vorfälle von Verstößen gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz" zu "Feature-Artikeln". Heute gibt es in Japan keine Anwälte, die das Gesetz verstehen. Ich erklärte dem Anwalt, warum ich nicht schuldig war, aber der Anwalt verstand es nicht.


Teil 1. Viele Menschen verstehen die Bösartigkeit dieses Vorfalls, weil sie täglich E-Mails versenden.
"Ich und Chinese KinGungaku" und "Beamte und Diplomaten der philippinischen Botschaft" sind diejenigen, die gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes verstoßen haben
Wir wurden mit den "Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches" bestraft, weil wir "falsche Dokumente" vorgelegt hatten.
Gemäß Artikel 31 der Verfassung ist niemand einer Festnahme, Inhaftierung oder Bestrafung unterworfen, die nicht auf dem Gesetz beruht.
Dieses Gesetz ist jedoch kein Verbrechen, da es ein Gesetz zur "Unterstützung" von Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes ist.
Der Akt der Erlangung eines "Aufenthaltsstatus" mit einem "falschen Dokument"
In Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes ist eindeutig festgelegt, dass es sich um eine behördliche Anordnung des Justizministers handelt.
Daher können die Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht zur Unterstützung von Handlungen angewendet werden, die keine Straftaten sind.

Ich erzählte das von meinem Anwalt.
(Da es in Gewahrsam ist, wird keine spezifische „Klausel“ im Einwanderungsgesetz erwähnt.)
Der Anwalt sagte jedoch: "Es macht keinen Sinn, Verfahrenstheorie zu sagen."
Als ich einen Anwalt um "Einfügung" des "Einwanderungsgesetzes" bat, traf eine "Ministerialverordnung" ein.
In den „Grundregeln für die Pflichten des Anwalts“ gibt „Ein Verteidiger“ die Pflicht zur Prüfung des Gesetzes an.
Die Tatsache, dass Anwälte das Gesetz nicht untersuchen, ermöglicht es den Staatsanwälten, Verbrechen zu begehen.

Nach dem Verlassen des Gefängnisses habe ich mich mit einem Anwalt der Kommunistischen Partei bezüglich eines "Antrags auf Wiederaufnahme des Verfahrens" beraten.
Sagte sie.
"Die Staatsanwaltschaft kann das Gesetz ändern, auf das sich die Anklage bezieht."
Dieser Fall ist jedoch ein „bestätigter Fall“.
Ich dachte, es wäre sinnlos, mit diesem Anwalt zu sprechen.

Ich habe mich auch mit einem Anwalt der "ehemaligen Demokratischen Partei" beraten (derzeit?).
Im Voraus hatte ich ihm alle Materialien über einen Stadtrat zur Verfügung gestellt.
Ich hatte vom Anwalt eine Antwort auf "Fehler im anwendbaren Recht" erwartet.
Sagte er.
Gemäß Artikel 64 des Strafgesetzbuchs ist „Chinesisch“ eine „Arbeitsstrafe“, daher ist die Anwendung von Artikel 60 und Artikel 62 „richtig“.
(Dies ist eine Antwort für "Kid Childhood").
Hinweis: Artikel 64 des Strafgesetzbuches.
Wenn der "positive Täter" "inhaftiert" oder "gut, gut" ist
Eine Klausel, die die Bestrafung von „Assistance“ „befreit“.

Dieser "Anwalt" lehnte die "Einrichtung" der "Verschwörung" ab.
Eine politische Partei mit einem Anwalt, der nicht einmal die "Logik des Gesetzes" verstehen kann, kann im Landtag nicht diskutiert werden.

Japanische Polizisten, Staatsanwälte, Richter, Anwälte,
Bitte geben Sie eine kriminelle Situation in den Medien an.
Der "Unterstützer", der meine E-Mail erhalten hat, sagt, dass es keine "Macht" gibt, gegen die japanische Regierung zu protestieren.
Aber sie sagen, sie wollen "Macht" sein.
In diesem Fall können Sie eine der folgenden Methoden zur Unterstützung in Betracht ziehen.
1) "Unterzeichne" den "Protest gegen die japanische Regierung".
2) Bitte rekrutieren Sie "Spenden an mich" in den Medien und Organisationen.
"Die Anzahl der Spender" und "der finanzierte Betrag" sind die Macht des Protests gegen die japanische Regierung.
3) Bitte boykottieren Sie japanische Produkte.
Die Japaner sagen, "das Unglück anderer schmeckt nach Honig".
Japaner können „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ nur verstehen, wenn sie „unglücklich“ werden.
Bitte mailen Sie mir für Details.

Weiter zur nächsten Woche.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174

Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“. Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "bewusste" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist
Ausländer, die illegal gearbeitet haben, sind ebenfalls "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
"Anwendbar" für "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Verbrechen" ist "Fehler im anwendbaren Recht".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es unterlag keinen strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen (Artikel 70, Artikel 74-6).
Diejenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz, das für Verwaltungsbeamte wie Verwaltungsbeamte und Schulpersonal gilt, wurde auf dem 192. Landtag eingeführt.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
Allerdings ist "etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht
"Stop" in "Altern, Statistik der Einschränkungen".

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.
Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus antwortete mir, dass ich ernsthaft über eine Lösung nachdenke, die mich mit diesem Problem zufrieden stellen würde.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis
Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-11-29: Dear Sir,
“New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several times. Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan. Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today, “There are no lawyers in Japan who understand the law.” I explained to the lawyer why I was not guilty, but the lawyer did not understand.


Part 1. Many people understand the maliciousness of this incident because they email every day.
“Me and Chinese KinGungaku” and “Philippine embassy officials
and diplomats” were punished under “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code”
because they provided “false documents” to those who violated the Immigration Act Article 70 received.
According to Article 31 of the Constitution, no one is subject to any arrest,
detention or punishment that is not based on law.
However, this act is not a crime because it is an act of "supporting" Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act.
The act of obtaining "Residence Status" from "false documents" is clearly stated
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act as administrative disposition by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code cannot be applied to support actions
that are not crimes.

I told this about my lawyer.
(Because it is imprisoned in custody, no specific “clause” in the Immigration Act is mentioned.)
However, the lawyer said, "It doesn't make sense to say procedural theory."
When I asked a lawyer for "insertion" of the "Immigration Law", a "Ministerial Ordinance" arrived.
In the “Basic Rules for the Attorney's Duties”,
“A defense attorney” states the duty to examine the law.
The fact that lawyers do not investigate the law makes it possible for prosecutors to commit crimes.

After leaving the prison, I consulted with a Communist Party lawyer for a “request for retrial”.
She said.
“The prosecution can change the law that the indictment applies to.”
However, this case is a “confirmed case”.
I thought it would be meaningless to talk to this lawyer.

I also consulted with a counsel at the “former Democratic Party” (currently?).
In advance, I had provided all materials to him via a city councilor.
I was expecting an answer from the lawyer to “Error in applicable law”.
He said.
According to Article 64 of the Penal Code, “Chinese” is a “work punishment”,
so the application of Article 60 and Article 62 is “correct”.
 (This is an answer for "Kid Childhood").
Reference: Article 64 of the Penal Code.
If the “positive offender” is “detained” or “fees, fine”,
it means a clause that “exempts” the punishment of “instigation, instigation” or “assistance”.

This “lawyer” opposed the “establishment” of “conspiracy”.
A political party with an attorney who can not understand even the "logic
of law" can not be discussed in the Diet.

Please feature the crime situations of Japanese police officers, prosecutors, judges,
lawyers, and media in the “Immigration Control Violation Case”.
The "supporters" who received my email say there is no "power" to protest the Japanese government,
but "they" say they want to be "power".
If so, please consider one of the following as a method of support.
1) “Sign” the “Protest against the Japanese Government”.
2) Please recruit "donations to me" in the media and organizations.
“The number of donors” and “funded amount” are the power of protest
against the Japanese government.
3) Please boycott Japanese products.
The Japanese say "others' misfortune tastes honey".
Japanese people cannot understand “governance under the law” unless they become “unhappy”.
Please email me for details.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!To everyone in the world's media 2019-11-29: Dear Sir, “New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system

To everyone in the world's media　



2019-11-29: Dear Sir,
“New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several times. Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan. Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today, “There are no lawyers in Japan who understand the law.” I explained to the lawyer why I was not guilty, but the lawyer did not understand.


Part 1. Many people understand the maliciousness of this incident because they email every day.
“Me and Chinese KinGungaku” and “Philippine embassy officials
and diplomats” were punished under “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code”
because they provided “false documents” to those who violated the Immigration Act Article 70 received.
According to Article 31 of the Constitution, no one is subject to any arrest,
detention or punishment that is not based on law.
However, this act is not a crime because it is an act of "supporting" Article 22-4-4
of the Immigration Control Act.
The act of obtaining "Residence Status" from "false documents" is clearly stated
in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act as administrative disposition by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, Articles 60 and 62 of the Criminal Code cannot be applied to support actions
that are not crimes.

I told this about my lawyer.
(Because it is imprisoned in custody, no specific “clause” in the Immigration Act is mentioned.)
However, the lawyer said, "It doesn't make sense to say procedural theory."
When I asked a lawyer for "insertion" of the "Immigration Law", a "Ministerial Ordinance" arrived.
In the “Basic Rules for the Attorney's Duties”,
“A defense attorney” states the duty to examine the law.
The fact that lawyers do not investigate the law makes it possible for prosecutors to commit crimes.

After leaving the prison, I consulted with a Communist Party lawyer for a “request for retrial”.
She said.
“The prosecution can change the law that the indictment applies to.”
However, this case is a “confirmed case”.
I thought it would be meaningless to talk to this lawyer.

I also consulted with a counsel at the “former Democratic Party” (currently?).
In advance, I had provided all materials to him via a city councilor.
I was expecting an answer from the lawyer to “Error in applicable law”.
He said.
According to Article 64 of the Penal Code, “Chinese” is a “work punishment”,
so the application of Article 60 and Article 62 is “correct”.
 (This is an answer for "Kid Childhood").
Reference: Article 64 of the Penal Code.
If the “positive offender” is “detained” or “fees, fine”,
it means a clause that “exempts” the punishment of “instigation, instigation” or “assistance”.

This “lawyer” opposed the “establishment” of “conspiracy”.
A political party with an attorney who can not understand even the "logic
of law" can not be discussed in the Diet.

Please feature the crime situations of Japanese police officers, prosecutors, judges,
lawyers, and media in the “Immigration Control Violation Case”.
The "supporters" who received my email say there is no "power" to protest the Japanese government,
but "they" say they want to be "power".
If so, please consider one of the following as a method of support.
1) “Sign” the “Protest against the Japanese Government”.
2) Please recruit "donations to me" in the media and organizations.
“The number of donors” and “funded amount” are the power of protest
against the Japanese government.
3) Please boycott Japanese products.
The Japanese say "others' misfortune tastes honey".
Japanese people cannot understand “governance under the law” unless they become “unhappy”.
Please email me for details.

Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”, it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2
(a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act
on the grounds of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties
for those who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan
and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials
and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled
by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government
for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim
for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty",
the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left
on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! 조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 최고 지도자 김정은 각하 2019-11-28 : 인사말, "뉴욕 타임스 등 미디어 '는 일본의 사법 제도를 거듭 비판하고있다. 일본의 사법 제도가 개

조선 민주주의 인민 공화국 최고 지도자 김정은 각하


2019-11-28 : 인사말,
"뉴욕 타임스 등 미디어 '는 일본의 사법 제도를 거듭 비판하고있다. 일본의 사법 제도가 개선되지 않는 한, 구미의 비즈니스맨은 일본에서 일을하는 것은 위험합니다. 나의 "입관 법 위반 사건」을 「특집, eature articles"하십시오. 오늘은 "불법 체포"입니다. "나의 무죄를 입증 어머니 2017 년 1 월의 입관 법 개정의 이유입니다." 국회는 "허위 서류의 제공은 무죄니까 죄에한다"며 입법했습니다.


제 1 부. "검찰"는 "있는 사상」에 따라 의식적으로 '체포'합니다.
카를로스 곤 씨의 경우에 "일본의 닛산 자동차 '를 프랑스'가지고 싶지 않다"부터입니다.
내 경우는 대량으로 일본에 와서 불법 稼く 중국인에 대한 '증오'입니다.
일반적으로 "소액의 벌금형 '에서'강제 퇴거 '입니다.
당시 정부는 "민주당"였습니다.
민주당 "지바 게이코 법무 대신"입관 직원이있다 "사실 조사권」행사시
경찰관의 동행을 인정하지 않는다 "통지"를 낸 것입니다.
이에 따라 "중국의 불법 노동 '의 수사가 어렵습니다.
그래서 '입관 법 70 조를 위반 한 중국인 "에"징계 "를 위해"징역 선고 "한 것입니다.
"징역 선고"하기 위해 고용주를 입관 법 73-2 조에서 처벌해야합니다.
그러나 검찰은 고용주가 일본인이기 때문에 처벌하고 싶지 않아요.
그래서 '미운 중국 "을 고용하는'나 '에"눈을 붙인 것입니다. "
내 범죄 이유는 "허위 서류"를 중국에 제공 한 것입니다.
이 입관 법 22-4-4 조는 법무부 장관의 '행정 처분'그래서 처벌은 할 수 없습니다.
내 체포는 2010 년 6 월 14 일입니다.
그러나 2010 년 7 월 1 일부터 입관 법 개정으로 「허위 서류 "를"제공 "외국인은
「재류 자격」을 「취득한 외국인 "과 같은"취급 "에 있습니다.
즉 처벌 할 수 없다는 것을 알고있었습니다.
그러나 "저와 중국인 KinGungaku"을 "허위 서류"를 제공 한 이유로 체포되었습니다.
이것은 계산 된 범죄입니다.
일반적으로 체포되면 거짓말이라도 모두는 "죄를 인정합니다."
검찰의 "계산 착오"는 "내가 죄를 인정하지 않았다 것"에 있습니다.
경찰, 검사, 판사는 "시나리오"를 "결행"하고 '범죄'에 달렸습니다.

"입관 법 위반 사건 '에서 일본의 경찰, 검찰, 판사, 변호사,
미디어의 범죄 사태를 특집하십시오.
내 메일을 수신 한 "지원자"는 일본 정부에 항의하기 위해 '힘'이 없다고합니다,
그러나 "그들"은 '힘'이되고 싶다 말한다.
그렇다면, 지원의 방법으로 다음 중 하나를 고려하십시오.
1) 「일본 정부에 항의서 '에'서명 '을하십시오.
2) 미디어 및 단체에서 "저에게 기부금」을 모집합니다.
"기부자의 수 '나'모금액"는 일본 정부에 '항의의 힘 "입니다.
3) 일본 제품의 불매 운동을하십시오.
일본인은 "타인의 불행은 꿀의 맛"이라고합니다.
일본인은 각각 '불행'이되어야 "법에 따라 통치"가 이해할 수 없습니다.
자세한 내용은 저에게 메일을주세요.

내일 계속됩니다.

아래의 "사이트"에서 "bill of indictment"를 참조하십시오.
이 사건이 "bill of indictment"을 본 것만으로,
당신은 "적용 법률의 오류"를 이해할 수 있습니다.

"영문 번역」과 「일본어 원문 'PDF 파일을 참조하십시오.
개인 정보의 취급에 충분히주의를하십시오.
● 영문 번역 "기소 letter of indictment"
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
영문 번역은 참고입니다. 정확하게는 각자해야합니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● 일본어 원문 '기소 letter of indictment "
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
영문 번역은 잘못된 것입니다. 영문 번역은 위의 "PDF"를 참조하십시오.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● 관련 법률을 참조하십시오. (일본어 및 영문 번역)
1) 出入国管理及び難民認定法
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) 형법
Penal Code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) 일본 국 헌법
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


제 2 부. 나는 두 가지를 "호소"있습니다.
"2019 년 11 월 4 일 개정"
나는뿐만 아니라 중국이나 필리핀 사람뿐만 아니라
세계의 많은 희생자를 위해 싸우고 있습니다.
사건에서 10 년 가까이됩니다. 내 생명에는 한계가 있습니다.
세계가 "법에 따라 통치 '를 무시한다면 테러로 해결하는 것은 당연합니다.

1. 외국인이 「재류 자격」이외의 「불법 노동 '을 실시했다.
그러나 외국인은 무죄입니다.
외국인 만 입관 법 70 조 "불법 노동의 죄 '로 처벌되었습니다.
이에 대해 입관 법은 불법 노동의 '인과 관계'인 고용주를 입관 법 73-2 조
(불법 취업을 조장 한 죄)로 처벌하고 있습니다.
그러나 일본의 사법은 외국인 만 "처벌"했지만 "고용주"을 "처벌"하지 않습니다.
이것은 분명히 일본 국 헌법 14 조 '법 아래 평등의 원칙'에 위배됩니다.
그리고 '의식'에 외국인 만 "처벌"하는 것을 금지 한 국제법을 위반하고 있습니다.
불법으로 외국인을 고용 한 고용주가 "무죄"이면 불법으로 일하게 된 외국인도 '무죄'입니다. .

2. 검찰은 "입관 법 22-4-4 조 지원"을 이유로
입관 법 70 조에 대하여 형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄"를 "적용"했지만
"적용 법률의 오류"입니다.
"입관 법 22-4-4 조"는 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 사람의 처분입니다.
::::
기존 입관 법은 허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자에 대하여
처벌의 대상이 없습니다 (구법 70 조, 74 조의 6).
허위 신청에 의해 재류 자격을 취득한 자이를 방조한 회사, 변호사,
행정 서사 및 교직원 등의 신청 대행 사람을 처벌 대상으로 한 개정 입관 법 제 192 회 임시 국회에서 성립했습니다.
"2017 년 1 월 1 일부터 시행"되어 있습니다.
::::
"나, KinGungaku, 필리핀 국가의 외교관, 필리핀 대사관 직원"100 % "무죄"입니다.

"참고": 외국인이 입국 관리법 22-4-4 조
(허위 서류를 제출하는 것에 의한 status of residence의 취득)에 규정하는 행위를했다.
그러나 이에 대한 "형사 처벌"은 없습니다.
처분은 법무부 장관의 'status of residence 취소'와 '국외 강제 퇴거 "입니다.
따라서 「형법 60 조 및 62 조의 "다른 범죄를 지원하는 죄 '가 적용되지 않습니다.
"기소"가 지적하는 입관 법 22-4-4 조의 '범죄의 이유'는 입관 법 70 조 및 인과 관계가 없다.

검찰은 "고소장, bill of indictment"을 "握りつぶす, crush something in one 's hand"하고 있습니다.
그러나 국가 권력에 의한 "crush something in one 's hand"는
"시효, statute of limitations"의 "정지"입니다.

자료는 아래에 있습니다.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

피해자는 세계에 많이 있습니다.

감사합니다. Yasuhiro Nagano

추신 : White House는이 문제에서
내가 만족하는 해결책을 진지하게 검토하고 나는 대답했습니다.
나는 결과를 기다리고 있습니다.
"거짓말이 없다"것을 기대하고 있습니다.

나가노 恭博



최고 지도자 김정은 각하에게 부탁


일본 정부는 "메구미 씨」의 「유골」은 가짜라고 단언하고 있습니다.
이 '유골'이 가짜이기 때문에 북한의 말은 모두 믿을 수 없다.
그래서 '납북자'를 기인한다고 주장하고 있습니다.
그러나 영국의 과학 잡지 '네이처'는 DNA 감정에 의문을 제기하고 있습니다.
지금은 유엔이나 도널드 트럼프 대통령까지 일본 정부의 아군입니다.
북한은 '네이처'의 의문 등을 근거로 반박해야합니다.
정보는 아래에서 걷고 있습니다.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


세계를 움직이려면 중 하나가 필요합니다
"핵 미사일"또는 "거액의 돈"입니다.
"핵 미사일"에 집착하는 '김정은 각하'의 생각은 옳은 것 같습니다.
중국 말입니다.
"Without the trust of the people, there can be no government"
북한의 국민을 "중요한"합니다.


내 정보 

우편 번호 2610-0003
주소 Mihamaku Chiba-City Japan
이름 YasuhiroNagano 나가노 恭博
휴대 전화
이메일


도와주세요.
불명 한 점은 문의 해주십시오.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me!2019-11-28：亲爱的先生， 《纽约时报》和其他媒体多次批评日本司法制度。除非日本的司法制度得到改善，否则西方

2019-11-28：亲爱的先生，
《纽约时报》和其他媒体多次批评日本司法制度。除非日本的司法制度得到改善，否则西方商人在日本工作很危险。请把我的“违反移民法事件”作为“特色文章”。今天是“非法逮捕”。 “我的无罪证明是2017年1月修订《移民法》的原因。”立法机关立法规定，“提供虚假文件无罪，因此构成犯罪”。


第一部分“起诉”基于“某个想法”自觉地“逮捕”。
在卡洛斯·戈恩（Carlos Ghosn）的情况下，“日本不希望采用”日本的日产汽车”。
就我而言，这是对来日本非法赚钱的中国人的“仇恨”。
通常是“小额罚款”和“移出”。
当时的政府是“民主党”。
当民主党“千叶县司法部长”行使移民官员的“调查事实的权利”时，
发出了“通知”，不允许警察陪同。
这使得调查“中国非法劳工”变得困难。
因此，对“违反了《出入境管理法》第70条的中国人”的“处分”被定为“有期徒刑”。
必须根据《移民管制法》第73-2条对雇主进行惩罚，以使他们“被判处有期徒刑”。
但是，起诉方不愿惩罚，因为雇主是日本人。
这就是为什么我“看”雇用“讨厌中国人”的“我”的原因。
我的犯罪理由是向中国人提供“虚假文件”。
由于该《移民法》第22-4-4条是司法部长的“行政处分”，因此不可能受到惩罚。
我的逮捕于2010年6月14日。
但是，自2010年7月1日起，由于修订了《移民管制法》而“提供”“假证件”的外国人
现在，“居住状态”与“获得的外国人”相同。
换句话说，他们知道自己不会受到惩罚。
但是，他因提供“虚假文件”而逮捕了“我和中国KinGungaku”。
这是有计划的犯罪。
通常，即使被捕，每个人都“承认罪恶”。
检方的“计算错误”在“我没有承认犯罪”中。
警官，检察官和法官对“犯罪”采取“方案”。

日本警官，检察官，法官，律师，
请在媒体上报道犯罪情况。
收到我电子邮件的“支持者”说，没有“权力”来抗议日本政府，
但是他们说他们想成为“力量”。
如果是这样，请考虑以下一种支持方法。
1）“签署”“对日本政府的抗议”。
2）请在媒体和组织中募集“对我的捐赠”。
“捐助者数量”和“资助金额”是抗议日本政府的权力。
3）请抵制日本产品。
日本人说“别人的不幸尝到蜂蜜”。
日本人除非变得“不高兴”，否则无法理解“依法治国”。
请给我发电子邮件了解详细信息。

明天将继续。

请在下面的“网站”上看到“起诉书”。
在这种情况下，只需查看此“起诉书”
您可以理解“适用法律的错误”。

请参阅“英语翻译”和“日语文本” PDF。
处理个人信息时请小心。
●英文翻译成“起诉书”
“针对长野康宏起诉书”
英文翻译仅供参考。确切地说，自己动手做。
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
●原始日文文字“起诉书”
“对长野泰弘的起诉书（日语）”
英文翻译不正确。请参见上面的“ PDF”进行英语翻译。
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
●请参阅相关法律。 （日语和英语翻译）
1）《移民控制和难民承认法》
移民控制和难民承认法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2）刑法
刑法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3）日本宪法
日本宪法
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


第二部分我“起诉”两件事。
``修订于2019年11月4日''
我不仅是中国人和菲律宾人，
为世界上许多受害者而战。
事发至今已有近十年时间。我的生命有限。
如果世界无视“依法治国”，那自然就可以通过恐怖主义来解决。

1。外国人除了“居住资格”以外还从事“非法劳动”。
但是外国人是无辜的。
仅外国人因《移民法》第70条“非法劳工犯罪”而受到惩罚。
另一方面，《移民管制法》将“造成”非法劳工的雇主指定为第73-2条
我们受到（促进非法就业的罪恶）的惩罚。
但是，日本司法机关只“惩罚”外国人，而不是“雇主”。
这显然违反了日本宪法第14条“法律上的平等原则”。
它违反了禁止“有意识地”“惩罚”外国人的国际法。
如果非法雇用外国人的雇主是“无辜的”，那么非法雇用的外国人也是“无辜的”。 。

2。起诉是因为“移民法第22-4-4条的支持”
《移民法》第70条对刑法“罪犯支持其他犯罪”的第60条和第62条“适用”
这是“错误的法律适用”。
“移民法第22-4-4条”是对通过假申请获得居留身份的人的处置。
:::::
传统上，《移民管制法》适用于通过虚假申请获得居留身份的人。
它不受刑事法规的约束（第70条，第74-6条）。
通过伪造申请获得居留权的人，工作场所，律师，
在第192国会制定了修订后的《移民控制法》，该法律适用于行政干事和学校职员等行政人员。
“自2017年1月1日起生效”。
:::::
“我，KinGungaku，菲律宾外交官和菲律宾大使馆雇员”是100％“无辜的”。

“参考”：外国人移民法第22-4-4条
进行了（通过提交虚假文件获得居留身份）中规定的行为。
但是，对此没有“刑事处罚”。
处置是司法部长“取消居留身份”和“强迫搬迁”。
因此，《刑法》第60条和第62条中的“支持其他罪行的犯罪”不适用。
“起诉书”指出的《移民法》第22-4-4条中的“犯罪原因”与《移民法》第70条没有因果关系。

检察官是“粉碎某物”。
但是，被国家权力“压碎某人的手”是
“老化，限制统计”中的“停止”。

材料如下。
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

世界上有许多受害者。

最好的问候。长野康广

PS：白宫有这个问题。
我回答说，我正在认真考虑一个令人满意的解决方案。
我在等结果
我希望没有谎言。

长野康广

Help me! To President Trump 2019-11-28: Dear Sir,“My proof of innocence is the reason for the revision of the Immigration Act in January 2017.”

To President Trump
2019-11-28: Dear Sir,
“New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several times. Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan. Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today is “illegal arrest”. “My proof of innocence is the reason for the revision of the Immigration Act in January 2017.” The legislature legislated that “providing false documents is not guilty, so make it a crime”.


Part 1. “Prosecution” consciously “arrests” based on “a certain idea”.
In the case of Carlos Ghosn, “Nissan Motors in Japan” is “not wanted to be taken” by France.
In my case, it is “hate” against Chinese who come to Japan and earn illegally.
It is usually “small penalty” and “move out”.
The administration at that time was "Democratic Party".
The Democratic Party “Minister of Justice Chiba” issued a “Notification”
that refuses to accompany police officers when exercising the “right to investigate facts” held
by immigration officials.
This made it difficult to investigate “Chinese illegal labor”.
Therefore, it was made "punishment for imprisonment" for "punishment"
for "Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act".
Employers must be punished according to Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
in order to make them “punishment for imprisonment”.
However, the prosecution does not want to punish because the employer is Japanese.
That's why I “looked” at “I” who hired “hate Chinese”.
My criminal reason was providing "false documents" to the Chinese.
Since this Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 is an "administrative disposition"
by the Minister of Justice, no punishment is possible.
My arrest was on June 14, 2010.
However, from July 1, 2010, foreigners who “provided” “false documents” as a result
of amendments to the Immigration Control Law have been treated the same as “foreigners
who have acquired residence status”.
In other words, they knew that they could not be punished.
However, he arrested "I and Chinese KinGungaku" for providing "false documents."
This is a calculated crime.
Usually, even if they are arrested, everyone “acknowledges sin”.
The prosecution's "calculation error" is in "I did not admit the crime".
Police officers, prosecutors, and judges ran “scenarios” to “crimes”.

Please feature the crime situations of Japanese police officers, prosecutors,
judges, lawyers, and media in the “Immigration Control Violation Case”.
The "supporters" who received my email say there is no "power" to protest the Japanese government,
but "they" say they want to be "power".
If so, please consider one of the following as a method of support.
1) “Sign” the “Protest against the Japanese Government”.
2) Please recruit "donations to me" in the media and organizations.
“The number of donors” and “funded amount” are the power
of protest against the Japanese government.
3) Please boycott Japanese products.
The Japanese say "others' misfortune tastes honey".
Japanese people cannot understand “governance under the law” unless they become “unhappy”.
Please email me for details.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-11-28: Monsieur, Le «New York Times et d’autres médias» ont critiqué à plusieurs reprises le système judiciaire japonais. Si le système judiciaire japonais n'est pas amélioré, il

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-11-28: Monsieur,
Le «New York Times et d’autres médias» ont critiqué à plusieurs reprises le système judiciaire japonais. Si le système judiciaire japonais n'est pas amélioré, il est dangereux pour les hommes d'affaires occidentaux de travailler au Japon. S'il vous plaît faites mes «incidents de violations de la loi sur l'immigration» «articles de fond». Aujourd'hui c'est «arrestation illégale». «Ma preuve d'innocence est la raison de la révision de la loi sur l'immigration en janvier 2017.» Le législateur a légiféré pour que «fournir de faux documents ne soit pas coupable, alors faites-en un crime».


Partie 1 «Accusation» consciemment «arrête» sur la base d'une «certaine idée».
Dans le cas de Carlos Ghosn, «Nissan Motors in Japan» n'est «pas voulu être pris» par la France.
Dans mon cas, c'est de la "haine" contre les Chinois qui viennent au Japon et gagnent illégalement.
Il s’agit généralement de «petite sanction» et de «déménagement».
L'administration à cette époque était "le Parti Démocratique".
Lorsque le «ministre de la Justice Chiba» du parti démocrate exerce le «droit d'enquêter sur les faits» détenus par les agents de l'immigration,
Un «avis» a été émis pour empêcher les policiers de les accompagner.
Cela rendait difficile l’enquête sur le «travail illégal chinois».
Par conséquent, il a été fait "punition pour emprisonnement" pour "punition" à "Chinois qui ont violé l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration".
Les employeurs doivent être punis conformément à l’article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration afin de les qualifier de «peine d’emprisonnement».
Cependant, la poursuite ne veut pas punir parce que l'employeur est japonais.
C'est pourquoi j'ai "regardé" le "moi" qui a embauché "déteste les Chinois".
Ma raison pénale était de fournir de "faux documents" aux Chinois.
L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration constituant une "décision administrative" du ministre de la Justice, aucune sanction n'est possible.
Mon arrestation a eu lieu le 14 juin 2010.
Cependant, à compter du 1er juillet 2010, les étrangers qui ont «fourni» de «faux documents» en raison de la révision de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
Le «statut de résidence» est désormais «traité» de la même manière que «l’étranger acquis».
En d'autres termes, ils savaient qu'ils ne pourraient pas être punis.
Cependant, il a arrêté "I and Chinese KinGungaku" pour avoir fourni de "faux documents".
C'est un crime calculé.
D'habitude, même s'ils sont arrêtés, tout le monde «reconnaît le péché».
"L'erreur de calcul" de l'accusation est dans "Je n'ai pas admis le crime".
Les policiers, les procureurs et les juges ont eu recours à des «scénarios» pour «crimes».

Officiers de police japonais, procureurs, juges, avocats,
Veuillez présenter une situation de criminalité dans les médias.
Le "partisan" qui a reçu mon email a déclaré qu'il n'y avait pas de "pouvoir" pour protester contre le gouvernement japonais,
Mais ils disent qu'ils veulent être «pouvoir».
Si tel est le cas, veuillez considérer l'une des options suivantes comme une méthode d'assistance.
1) “Signer” la “manifestation contre le gouvernement japonais”.
2) Veuillez recruter des "dons pour moi" dans les médias et les organisations.
«Le nombre de donateurs» et le «montant financé» sont le pouvoir de protestation contre le gouvernement japonais.
3) S'il vous plaît, boycottez les produits japonais.
Les Japonais disent "le malheur des autres goûte le miel".
Les Japonais ne peuvent comprendre la «gouvernance conformément à la loi» à moins de devenir «malheureux».
S'il vous plaît écrivez-moi pour plus de détails.

Cela continuera demain.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".

Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
«Révisé le 4 novembre 2019»
Je ne suis pas seulement chinois et philippin,
Se battre pour de nombreuses victimes dans le monde.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence».
Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).
Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Cela est clairement contraire à l’article 14 «Principes d’égalité juridique» de la Constitution japonaise.
Il enfreint le droit international qui interdit "consciemment" de "punir" uniquement les étrangers.
Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent". .

2 La poursuite est due à "l'appui de l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration"
«Appliqué» aux articles 60 et 62 du code pénal «Les pécheurs soutenant d'autres crimes» contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "une mauvaise loi à appliquer".
"L'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration" concerne les personnes qui ont obtenu le statut de résident par le biais d'une fausse demande.
:::::
Traditionnellement, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration s'appliquait à ceux qui avaient obtenu le statut de résident par de fausses demandes.
Il n'était pas soumis à une réglementation pénale (article 70, article 74-6).
Ceux qui ont obtenu le statut de résidence par une demande de falsification, le lieu de travail, un avocat,
La nouvelle loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration, qui s'applique aux agents administratifs tels que les administrateurs et le personnel des écoles, a été mise en place à la 192ème diète.
«En vigueur à compter du 1er janvier 2017».
:::::
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin et employé de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis à 100% "innocent".

"Référence": loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Le procureur est "écraser quelque chose dans sa main".
Cependant, "écraser quelque chose dans sa main" par le pouvoir de l'État est
“Stop” dans “Ageing, statistiques des limitations”.

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: La Maison Blanche a ce problème.
J'ai répondu que je réfléchissais sérieusement à une solution satisfaisante.
J'attends le résultat
J'espère qu'il n'y a pas de mensonge.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten 2019-11-28: Sehr geehrter Herr, "New York Times und andere Medien" haben das japanische Justizsystem mehrmals kritisiert. Sofern das japanische Justizsystem nicht verbessert wird,

Angela Merkel zum deutschen Ministerpräsidenten


2019-11-28: Sehr geehrter Herr,
"New York Times und andere Medien" haben das japanische Justizsystem mehrmals kritisiert. Sofern das japanische Justizsystem nicht verbessert wird, ist es für westliche Geschäftsleute gefährlich, in Japan zu arbeiten. Bitte machen Sie meine "Vorfälle von Verstößen gegen das Einwanderungsgesetz" zu "Feature-Artikeln". Heute ist "illegale Verhaftung". "Mein Unschuldsnachweis ist der Grund für die Überarbeitung des Einwanderungsgesetzes im Januar 2017." Der Gesetzgeber stellte fest, dass „die Bereitstellung falscher Dokumente nicht schuldig ist, machen Sie es zu einem Verbrechen“.


Teil 1. Die „Staatsanwaltschaft“ „verhaftet“ bewusst aufgrund einer „bestimmten Idee“.
Im Fall von Carlos Ghosn wird "Nissan Motors in Japan" von Frankreich "nicht mitgenommen".
In meinem Fall ist es "Hass" gegen Chinesen, die nach Japan kommen und illegal verdienen.
Es ist in der Regel "kleine Strafe" und "ausziehen".
Die damalige Regierung war "Demokratische Partei".
Wenn der "Justizminister Chiba" der Demokratischen Partei das "Recht auf Untersuchung von Tatsachen" ausübt, das die Einwanderungsbeamten besitzen,
Es wurde eine "Mitteilung" herausgegeben, die Polizeibeamten die Begleitung untersagte.
Dies machte es schwierig, „chinesische illegale Arbeit“ zu untersuchen.
Daher wurde "Bestrafung für Inhaftierung" für "Bestrafung" für "Chinesen, die gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes verstießen" verhängt.
Arbeitgeber müssen gemäß Artikel 73-2 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes bestraft werden, um zu einer „Strafe für Inhaftierung“ zu werden.
Die Staatsanwaltschaft will jedoch nicht bestrafen, weil der Arbeitgeber Japaner ist.
Das ist der Grund, warum ich mich nach „Ich“ umgesehen habe, die „Hass-Chinesen“ eingestellt haben.
Mein krimineller Grund war, den Chinesen "falsche Dokumente" zur Verfügung zu stellen.
Da es sich bei Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes um eine "behördliche Anordnung" des Justizministers handelt, ist keine Bestrafung möglich.
Meine Verhaftung war am 14. Juni 2010.
Ab dem 1. Juli 2010 haben Ausländer jedoch aufgrund der Überarbeitung des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes „falsche Dokumente“ vorgelegt
Der "Aufenthaltsstatus" wird jetzt wie der "erworbene Ausländer" "behandelt".
Mit anderen Worten, sie wussten, dass sie nicht bestraft werden konnten.
Er verhaftete jedoch "I and Chinese KinGungaku", weil er "falsche Dokumente" zur Verfügung gestellt hatte.
Dies ist ein kalkuliertes Verbrechen.
Selbst wenn sie verhaftet werden, „erkennt jeder die Sünde an“.
Der "Berechnungsfehler" der Staatsanwaltschaft lautet "Ich habe das Verbrechen nicht zugelassen".
Polizisten, Staatsanwälte und Richter führten "Szenarien" zu "Verbrechen".

Japanische Polizisten, Staatsanwälte, Richter, Anwälte,
Bitte geben Sie eine kriminelle Situation in den Medien an.
Der "Unterstützer", der meine E-Mail erhalten hat, sagt, dass es keine "Macht" gibt, gegen die japanische Regierung zu protestieren.
Aber sie sagen, sie wollen "Macht" sein.
In diesem Fall können Sie eine der folgenden Methoden zur Unterstützung in Betracht ziehen.
1) "Unterzeichne" den "Protest gegen die japanische Regierung".
2) Bitte rekrutieren Sie "Spenden an mich" in den Medien und Organisationen.
"Die Anzahl der Spender" und "der finanzierte Betrag" sind die Macht des Protests gegen die japanische Regierung.
3) Bitte boykottieren Sie japanische Produkte.
Die Japaner sagen, "das Unglück anderer schmeckt nach Honig".
Japaner können „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ nur verstehen, wenn sie „unglücklich“ werden.
Bitte mailen Sie mir für Details.

Es wird morgen weitergehen.

Siehe "Anklageschrift" auf der folgenden "Site".
In diesem Fall nur auf diese "Anklageschrift"
Sie können "Fehler des anwendbaren Rechts" verstehen.

Bitte lesen Sie die PDF-Dateien „Englische Übersetzung“ und „Japanischer Text“.
Bitte seien Sie vorsichtig beim Umgang mit persönlichen Daten.
● Übersetzung des englischen Satzes "Letter of Indictment"
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
Die englische Übersetzung dient nur als Referenz. Um genau zu sein, machen Sie es selbst.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Japanischer Originaltext „Anklageschreiben“
"Anklage gegen Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanisch)"
Die englische Übersetzung ist falsch. Die englische Übersetzung finden Sie oben unter "PDF".
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Bitte beachten Sie die entsprechenden Gesetze. (Japanische und englische Übersetzung)
1) Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
Gesetz über die Einwanderungskontrolle und die Anerkennung von Flüchtlingen
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Strafrecht
Strafgesetzbuch
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Verfassung Japans
Die Verfassung von Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Teil 2. Ich "verklage" zwei Dinge.
"Überarbeitet am 4. November 2019"
Ich bin nicht nur chinesisch und philippinisch,
Für viele Opfer auf der Welt kämpfen.
Seit dem Vorfall sind fast 10 Jahre vergangen. Mein Leben ist begrenzt.
Wenn die Welt die „Governance nach dem Gesetz“ ignoriert, ist es selbstverständlich, dass sie durch Terrorismus gelöst wird.

1. Ausländer verrichteten „illegale Arbeit“ mit Ausnahme der „Qualifikation des Wohnsitzes“.
Aber Ausländer sind unschuldig.
Für den einwanderungsrechtlichen Artikel 70 „Illegale Arbeitsverbrechen“ wurden nur Ausländer bestraft.
Andererseits bestimmt das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz Arbeitgeber, die für illegale Arbeit „ursächlich“ sind, als Artikel 73-2
Wir werden bestraft durch (Sünde, die illegale Beschäftigung fördert).
Die japanische Justiz "bestraft" jedoch nur Ausländer, nicht aber "Arbeitgeber".
Dies verstößt eindeutig gegen Artikel 14 „Grundsätze der Gleichbehandlung nach dem Gesetz“ der japanischen Verfassung.
Es verstößt gegen das Völkerrecht, das die "bewusste" "Bestrafung" nur von Ausländern verbietet.
Wenn ein Arbeitgeber, der einen Ausländer illegal anstellt, "unschuldig" ist, ist ein illegal angestellter Ausländer auch "unschuldig". .

2. Die Strafverfolgung erfolgt wegen "Unterstützung des Zuwanderungsgesetzes Artikel 22-4-4"
"Angewandte" Artikel 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuches "Sünder, die andere Verbrechen unterstützen" gegen Artikel 70 des Einwanderungskontrollgesetzes
Es ist "falsches Gesetz anzuwenden".
"Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes" ist die Verfügung derjenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch einen gefälschten Antrag erhalten haben.
:::::
Traditionell wurde das Einwanderungskontrollgesetz auf Personen angewendet, die aufgrund falscher Anträge den Aufenthaltsstatus erhalten haben.
Es unterlag keinen strafrechtlichen Bestimmungen (Artikel 70, Artikel 74-6).
Diejenigen, die den Aufenthaltsstatus durch Fälschung Antrag erhalten haben, der Arbeitsplatz, Anwalt,
Das überarbeitete Einwanderungskontrollgesetz, das für Verwaltungsbeamte wie Verwaltungsbeamte und Schulpersonal gilt, wurde auf dem 192. Landtag eingeführt.
"Gültig ab 1. Januar 2017".
:::::
"Ich, KinGungaku, philippinischer Diplomat und philippinischer Botschaftsangestellter" bin zu 100% "unschuldig".

"Hinweis": Ausländerzuwanderungsgesetz Artikel 22-4-4
Die in (Erlangung des Aufenthaltsstatus durch Vorlage falscher Dokumente) vorgeschriebene Handlung wurde durchgeführt.
Hierfür gibt es jedoch keine „strafrechtliche Bestrafung“.
Entsorgung ist "Aufhebung des Aufenthaltsstatus" und "Zwangsumsiedlung" durch den Justizminister.
Daher ist das "Verbrechen zur Unterstützung anderer Straftaten" in den Artikeln 60 und 62 des Strafgesetzbuchs nicht anwendbar.
Der durch die Anklage hervorgehobene „Grund für Straftaten“ in Artikel 22-4-4 des Einwanderungsgesetzes steht in keinem kausalen Zusammenhang mit Artikel 70 des Einwanderungsgesetzes.

Der Staatsanwalt ist "etwas in die Hand zerdrücken".
Allerdings ist "etwas in der Hand zerdrücken" durch die Staatsmacht
"Stop" in "Altern, Statistik der Einschränkungen".

Die Materialien sind unten.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Es gibt viele Opfer auf der Welt.

Beste Grüße Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: Das Weiße Haus hat dieses Problem.
Ich antwortete, dass ich ernsthaft eine zufriedenstellende Lösung erwäge.
Ich warte auf das Ergebnis
Ich hoffe, dass es keine Lüge gibt.

Yasuhiro Nagano


Meine Informationen

Es wird im folgenden Blog veröffentlicht.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/




Nationalität Japan

Nennen Sie Yasuhiro Nagano

E-Mail  nagano_ mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Bitte hilf mir.
Bitte kontaktieren Sie uns bei Fragen.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Help me! To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-11-28: Dear Sir, Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today is “illegal arrest”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-11-28: Dear Sir,
“New York Times and other media” have criticized the Japanese justice system several times. Unless the Japanese justice system is improved, it is dangerous for Western businessmen to work in Japan. Please make my “incidents of immigration law violations” “feature articles.” Today is “illegal arrest”. “My proof of innocence is the reason for the revision of the Immigration Act in January 2017.” The legislature legislated that “providing false documents is not guilty, so make it a crime”.


Part 1. “Prosecution” consciously “arrests” based on “a certain idea”.
In the case of Carlos Ghosn, “Nissan Motors in Japan” is “not wanted to be taken” by France.
In my case, it is “hate” against Chinese who come to Japan and earn illegally.
It is usually “small penalty” and “move out”.
The administration at that time was "Democratic Party".
The Democratic Party “Minister of Justice Chiba” issued a “Notification”
that refuses to accompany police officers when exercising the “right to investigate facts” held
by immigration officials.
This made it difficult to investigate “Chinese illegal labor”.
Therefore, it was made "punishment for imprisonment" for "punishment"
for "Chinese who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act".
Employers must be punished according to Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
in order to make them “punishment for imprisonment”.
However, the prosecution does not want to punish because the employer is Japanese.
That's why I “looked” at “I” who hired “hate Chinese”.
My criminal reason was providing "false documents" to the Chinese.
Since this Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 is an "administrative disposition"
by the Minister of Justice, no punishment is possible.
My arrest was on June 14, 2010.
However, from July 1, 2010, foreigners who “provided” “false documents” as a result
of amendments to the Immigration Control Law have been treated the same as “foreigners
who have acquired residence status”.
In other words, they knew that they could not be punished.
However, he arrested "I and Chinese KinGungaku" for providing "false documents."
This is a calculated crime.
Usually, even if they are arrested, everyone “acknowledges sin”.
The prosecution's "calculation error" is in "I did not admit the crime".
Police officers, prosecutors, and judges ran “scenarios” to “crimes”.

Please feature the crime situations of Japanese police officers, prosecutors,
judges, lawyers, and media in the “Immigration Control Violation Case”.
The "supporters" who received my email say there is no "power" to protest the Japanese government,
but "they" say they want to be "power".
If so, please consider one of the following as a method of support.
1) “Sign” the “Protest against the Japanese Government”.
2) Please recruit "donations to me" in the media and organizations.
“The number of donors” and “funded amount” are the power
of protest against the Japanese government.
3) Please boycott Japanese products.
The Japanese say "others' misfortune tastes honey".
Japanese people cannot understand “governance under the law” unless they become “unhappy”.
Please email me for details.

It will continue tomorrow.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
`` Revised November 4, 2019 ''
I'm not only Chinese and Philippine,
Fighting for many victims in the world.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Act punishes employers who are “causal”
of illegal labor under the Immigration Act Article 73-2 (a crime that promotes illegal employment).
However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to Article 14 “Principles of Equality under the Law”
of the Japanese Constitution.
It violates international law that prohibits "consciously" "punishing" only foreigners.
If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent". .

2. The prosecution “applied” the crimes supporting other crimes in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70 of the Immigration Act on the grounds
of “supporting the Immigration Law Article 22-4-4” Is an error in the law.
"Article 22-4-4 of Immigration Law" is the disposal of those
who have obtained the status of residence through fake application.
:::::
Previously, the Immigration Control Act was not subject to penalties for those
who obtained status of residence through false applications (Article 70, Article 74-6).
The Amended Immigration Act was enacted at the 192nd Special Diet session
for those who obtained status of residence through falsification applications,
office workers who helped them, lawyers, administrative scriveners, and school staff.
“Effective from January 1, 2017”.
:::::
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat and Philippine embassy employee" is 100% "innocent".

“Reference”: Foreigners acted in accordance with Article 22-4-4
 (Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
 However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The prosecutor is "crush something in one's hand".
However, “crush something in one's hand” by the state power is “stop”
of “aging, statistics of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.
Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

PS: The White House replied to me that I was seriously considering a solution
that would satisfy me with this issue.
I am waiting for the result I hope that there is no lie.

Yasuhiro Nagano


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp