To President Trump! 2025-02-06: Newsweek: From major policy changes to major executive orders, Trump's "day one" agenda was a big factor in attracting voters.

 To President Trump!

2025-02-06: Weekday edition.

Newsweek: President Trump faces early difficulties with five "major pledges" he failed to fulfill on his first day in office. It's too early to "bully" President Trump!

Newsweek: From major policy changes to major executive orders, Trump's "day one" agenda was a big factor in attracting voters.

Even now in office, Americans are "excited" and expecting. "Clean up" Biden's mess, Trump is in trouble! "Trump", hang in there!

Mr. Trump's failure to fulfill many of his "day one" pledges highlights how difficult it is to translate bold statements into concrete policies.

On "ending the Ukraine war". Mr. Trump claimed he would end the war within 24 hours of taking office. He then suggested he would end the war in "six months".

"We" believe the war will end if the US doesn't provide funds to Ukraine. That's fine.

After Mr. Trump's election victory, Senator Rubio said that both Russia and Ukraine need to compromise to resolve this war.

Mr. Rubio said that Russia cannot take control of the whole of Ukraine. But he also said that it is impossible to return the Russian military to the state of Ukraine be-fore the invasion.

I think Mr. Rubio should tell Mr. Zelensky that it is Mr. Zelensky's fault for promising to take back the territory through war.

Opinion polls show that the Ukrainian people have "given up" on "taking back" eastern Ukraine from Russia. Mr. Zelensky should listen to the voice of the Ukraini-an people.

The difference of opinion is the issue of NATO membership. NATO membership is an absolute condition for Ukraine. Russia will never allow Ukraine to join NATO.

Mr. Zelensky said that if Ukraine cannot join NATO, 200,000 NATO member coun-tries should send UN observers. The people involved are "astonished".

President Trump also emphasized that he will not allow Ukraine to join NATO. Mr. Trump has no choice but to adopt "my proposal" that Russia "allow Ukraine to join NATO".

That is, to give part of the Ukrainian territory to the "wandering Kurds" and create a "Kurdish state".

The proposal is to make the "Kurdish state" a new buffer state between Russia and "NATO, Ukraine". Of course, the "Kurdish state" needs to become a member of Rus-sia's military alliance (CSTO).

This way, President Trump can convince Mr. Putin. Ukraine will lose more territory, but it will be able to achieve its long-desired "NATO" membership.

President Trump, please meet with Mr. Putin as I proposed. Please order Secretary of State Rubio to meet with Mr. Zelensky as I proposed.

Part 1 Citations and References

Already facing difficulties... 5 "important promises" that the new President Trump failed to fulfill on his first day in office

https://www.newsweekjapan.jp/stories/world/2025/01/534091.php

I will write again tomorrow.

Part 2. "Immigration Control Act Violation Cases" "Weekday Edition".

"Everyone" in the "international community" please help!

First, please read about the "false accusation" of "aiding and abetting violation of immigration law" in 2010.

"Chapter 1". The summary of the incident is as follows.

In the fall of 2008, my company (I am the president) promised to hire "Chinese people studying abroad on student visas". I "issued" them "employment contracts" stating that "LEFCO" would "employ" them when they graduated from university the following spring.

However, after that, the "Lehman Shock" occurred in 2008.

As a result, orders for "system development" from the following year onwards were "cancelled".

As a result, "LEFCO" "cancelled" the "employment" of "those who were scheduled to join the company" in 2009.

Therefore, "they" continued to work at the restaurants where they had worked part-time as students even after graduating in 2009.

In May 2010, the Chinese were arrested for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act" by "activities outside of the status of residence".

In June 2010, after their arrest, I and the Chinese person in charge of recruitment (KingGungaku) ​​were also arrested.

The reason was "crime of aiding and abetting" the Chinese for "violating Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act (activities outside the status of residence)".

<Reason for arrest> The prosecution said that I and KingGungaku giving the Chinese a "false employment contract" constituted "crime of aiding and abetting" under the Criminal Code.

"Chapter 2". Crimes in the judgment: (arbitrary and ridiculous)

The charges in the indictment are "the very provisions" of "Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Control Act".

If a "status of residence" is obtained by submitting false documents, the Minister of Justice can revoke the "status of residence" at his "discretion". (And the person will be deported).

Therefore, even if a Chinese person submits "false documents," it is not a crime. It is not a crime to "aid" an innocent act.

The "reason for punishment" in the judgment:

1. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" by submitting a "false employment contract."

2. And they violated the Immigration Control Act (activities outside of their status of residence).

3. The Chinese person obtained "resident status" because "we" provided the Chinese person with a "false employment contract."

4. The Chinese person was able to "reside" in Japan because he obtained "resident status."

5. Because of that, the Chinese person was able to "work illegally."

6. Therefore, "we" who "provided" the Chinese person with a "false employment contract" were punished for "aiding" the Chinese person's "activities outside of their status of residence."

This is an "error" in the arbitrary "logic of law."

This reasoning is the "argument" that "when the wind blows, the barrel maker (profits)." This goes against "legal logic" even internationally.

The "criminal reason" in the indictment cannot be a crime because the provisions of the "Immigration Control Act," which is a "special law," take precedence over the "Criminal Code," which is a "general law."

My argument:

"1": The Immigration Control Act stipulates that the Minister of Justice will revoke the act of a foreigner who has obtained a residence status by submitting false documents (Immigration Control Act: Article 22-4-4, cancellation of residence status) through "administrative disposition." That's all.

"2": The Chinese who engaged in "unqualified work activities" are not guilty. The reason is that their "employers" have not been punished for the "crime of aiding and abetting illegal employment" under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.

Therefore, under the principle of "equality under the law," the Chinese are not guilty.

The Japanese government has punished "diplomats and Philippine embassy staff" for the exact same "criminal reason."

However, like the Chinese government, the Philippine government is also silent.

The rest will be published in the Saturday edition.

Part 3. Special Zone Construction. A new business model.

Special Zones accept refugees and immigrants as temporary immigrant workers and limit their residence to the special zone.

Developed countries use them as low-wage workers and achieve high economic growth again.

Refugees and immigrants can get jobs and live a hopeful, humane life.

Temporary immigrants are low-wage, but "food, clothing, shelter, medical expenses, and education are free."

NO2: https://world-special-zone.seesaa.net/

NO1: https://naganoopinion.blog.jp/

For NO4: to NO10:, please see the Sunday edition.

Thank you.

Yasuhiro Nagano

Past articles can be viewed at the blog below.

https://toworldmedia.blogspot.com/

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us!

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp