To Boris Johnson British Prime Minister 2019-09-23: Dear Sir, It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice. Eliminating prosecutor crimes is the same in Japan. Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy. I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.

To Boris  Johnson British Prime Minister


2019-09-23: Dear Sir,
It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented
in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice.
Eliminating prosecutor crimes is the same in Japan.
Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy.
I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.


Part 1. Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law of “Principal offender” is true.
However, employers (helpers) have not been punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
This is a "deviation" for "Discretion". It is a violation of international law.
The prosecution says that the person
who provided the “false document” to the “principal offender” is an “Assistance crime”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
We claim Immigration Act 22-4- (4) as "reason for crime", but it is "error of applicable law".
This applies to "abuse of authority by special public officer".
The Supreme Court's “judgment example” does Arrest and confinement,
so “intentional proof” is not required.
Prosecutors should "accept" a "letter of complaint".

The following explains "a false name whose contents are false".
I will say the “conclusion” first.
The trial will be based on a “letter of complaint”.
The “reason for crime” in “letter of complaint” is described
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act “Disposition of obtaining visa status
by submitting false documents”.
In “letter of complaint”,
“false document” is “document of employment contract with false content”.
Foreigners who violate Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law will receive the
following “disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancel visa status.
2) Forced to leave the country.
Foreigners who have “Assisted” or “abetmented” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act are subject to the same treatment as “Principal offender”
in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
There will be no punishment before the revision.

“Principal offender” that violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act has already been punished. (1 year and a half in prison).
Employers are not punished by the Immigration Act Article 72-2.

This “bill of indictment” is an “indictment” to judge “an aider”
of Article 70 “Foreigners who did labor other than qualifications”
in the Immigration Control Act.
“Proposed facts” by the prosecutor is a crime for “supporting” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act.
However, Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law cannot be punished as described above.
Immigration Law Article 22-4- (4) states “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
So I insisted that the content is "the name of false sin."

The following are claims of prosecutors and judges who deviate from the "logic of law".
The judge's allegations are described in the judgment document.
In the “judgment document”,
“the act of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act” says “the activities outside the qualification
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act” and “the causal relationship is clear”.

It will continue tomorrow.


Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano



PS:
There are many American victims. I have seen this with my eyes.
If the prosecution does not arrest the employer, the Americans are not guilty.
The United States government should claim restoration and compensation
for the honor of Americans.
please support the "Appeal" to the "ICC."


It is open to the program below.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To everyone in the world's media As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration. 2019-09-23: Dear Sir, It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice.

To everyone in the world's media　


As a journalist, report the truth of Japan's judicial administration.


2019-09-23: Dear Sir,
It is expected that “Prosecution reform” will be implemented
in Korea with the appointment of a new Minister of Justice.
Eliminating prosecutor crimes is the same in Japan.
Prosecutors and judges' “abuse of power” “destroy” democracy.
I hope the White House will “revive” into a “democratic leader”.


Part 1. Violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Law of “Principal offender” is true.
However, employers (helpers) have not been punished under the Immigration Act Article 73-2.
This is a "deviation" for "Discretion". It is a violation of international law.
The prosecution says that the person
who provided the “false document” to the “principal offender” is an “Assistance crime”
in violation of Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
We claim Immigration Act 22-4- (4) as "reason for crime", but it is "error of applicable law".
This applies to "abuse of authority by special public officer".
The Supreme Court's “judgment example” does Arrest and confinement,
so “intentional proof” is not required.
Prosecutors should "accept" a "letter of complaint".

The following explains "a false name whose contents are false".
I will say the “conclusion” first.
The trial will be based on a “letter of complaint”.
The “reason for crime” in “letter of complaint” is described
in Article 22-4- (4) of the Immigration Act “Disposition of obtaining visa status
by submitting false documents”.
In “letter of complaint”,
“false document” is “document of employment contract with false content”.
Foreigners who violate Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law will receive the
following “disposition” from the Minister of Justice.
1) Cancel visa status.
2) Forced to leave the country.
Foreigners who have “Assisted” or “abetmented” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Control Act are subject to the same treatment as “Principal offender”
in the 2010 Immigration Control Amendment.
There will be no punishment before the revision.

“Principal offender” that violated Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act has already been punished. (1 year and a half in prison).
Employers are not punished by the Immigration Act Article 72-2.

This “bill of indictment” is an “indictment” to judge “an aider”
of Article 70 “Foreigners who did labor other than qualifications”
in the Immigration Control Act.
“Proposed facts” by the prosecutor is a crime for “supporting” Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act.
However, Article 22-4- (4) of Immigration Law cannot be punished as described above.
Immigration Law Article 22-4- (4) states “Administrative Disposition”
by the Minister of Justice.
So I insisted that the content is "the name of false sin."

The following are claims of prosecutors and judges who deviate from the "logic of law".
The judge's allegations are described in the judgment document.
In the “judgment document”,
“the act of supporting Article 22-4- (4)
of the Immigration Act” says “the activities outside the qualification
of Article 70 of the Immigration Act” and “the causal relationship is clear”.

It will continue tomorrow.


Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
(crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code against Article 70
of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence”
and “forced relocation” by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes” in Articles 60
and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Request to media

Many people around the world have been sacrificed.
As a journalist, please report the facts.
"Government under the law" can not be bought with money.
Chinese media should report the fact that poor Chinese are going to Japan and receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.
The Philippine media should "report" the fact that even embassy officials and diplomats are receiving "human rights abuses" from the Japanese government.

The Korean government should not pursue "cases" that have been settled by treaties such as "comfort women" or "drafted (factor) workers".
The Korean government should "request" the Japanese government for the "remedies" of the current "victims of human rights abuses under the Immigration Act".

If the Korean government accepts a "claim for personal compensation" ignoring the "Japan-Korea Treaty", the "Japan-Korea Treaty" has been destroyed. Thank you!!
"Japanese" asks the Korean government for the return of "Japanese personal property" left on the Korean peninsula.
The “Convention Treaty” approved by the Diet has a duty to protect as a nation.
Korean courts and Japanese courts have ignored treaties and laws established in parliament.
The world media should report the "illegal governance" taking place in East Asia.


My information

I hope for justice as your journalist.
Please inquire.

It is published in the following program.
http://omoide-tommy.seesaa.net/
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




Help me.
Please contact us if you have any questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion September 22, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “Europe should be re-emerged as“ the world champion ””. Dear Sir, Prime Minister Abe is "Great Yes Man". It is not just a contribution to President Trump. It also contributes to President Putin.

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion

September 22, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: “Europe should be re-emerged as“ the world champion ””.

Dear Sir,

Prime Minister Abe is "Great Yes Man".

It is not just a contribution to President Trump.

It also contributes to President Putin.

Part 1. Japan and Russia have a “barren top-level meeting”.

We paid 300 billion yen as an “economic cooperation fee” in 2016 for this “conference”.

The world's media should campaign to “to ask for money” to the Japanese government.

Countries that don't know this are losing money.

The world should be fair.

At the end of September, “Japan-US signing” news is flowing in “Japan-US trade negotiations”.

Japan calls it TAG (Japan-US Trade Agreement).

The United States is called FTA (Free Trade Agreement).

Japanese media rarely report on the “background” and results of trade negotiations between Japan and the United States.

What we are most interested in is the "rate of exchange clause".

The Japanese government has said that there is no talk from the US so far.

However, the “rate of exchange clause” cannot be “preferably treated” only in Japan.

If “favorable treatment” is given, “FTA countries” such as Mexico and Canada will also require “renegotiation”.

Therefore, it is impossible to “exclude” the “rate of exchange clause” part.

In the first place, why do we need a “border wall with Mexico”?

Donald Trump suddenly came up with a “thinking”.

And the Americans were “joyed”.

There are already over 10 million illegal immigrants in the United States.

Illegal immigrants are contributing to the US GDP.

If there are no illegal immigrants, I think the US economy is in a “troubled situation” at this time.

There is only one way to “win China” peacefully.

It is to accept the "poor people" as "provisional immigrants" by making the border with Mexico a "special zone".

If a wall is needed, the company that built the "factory" will build it.

We need more than 100 million “provisional migrants”.

I really want to say 1 billion people.

President Trump will be “shock dead”.

I say 100 million people for the “great president”.

Excellent White House staff should calculate the “GDP” effect of 100 million “provisional immigrants”.

And I expect to “report” it to a good president.

This is also true for the UK, Germany, France, etc.

“To re-establish Europe as a“ world champion, ”a“ special zone ”should be built and“ provisional immigrants ”accepted from the world to expand GDP.

Continue to next week.

Part 2. We propose to build “special zones” in Europe and other countries.

Please read along with suggestions to the US (Saturday).

April 14, 2019, Special Zone Sunday Edition: Please see

Prosperity of each country is realized by the world being free, democratic, and “ruled under the law”.

I seriously seek the rule of law.

Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

help me Opinion Sunday edition, September 22, 2019: Dear Sir, This time, South Korea is putting “false accusation” in “IAEA”. “That's absurd”. “I don't want to be told by Korea” as a Japanese. On March 23, 2017, the news of Korea and JTBC TV "Korean nuclear plant secretly releases harmful substances into the sea for more than 5 years". There is also a “testimony” that “nosebleed” came out of “woman diver”. Korea Net “Isn't it the same as Japan where the nuclear power plant exploded?”

Yasuhiro Nagano Opinion


Sunday edition, September 22, 2019: Dear Sir,
This time, South Korea is putting “false accusation” in “IAEA”.
“That's absurd”. “I don't want to be told by Korea” as a Japanese.
On March 23, 2017, the news of Korea
and JTBC TV "Korean nuclear plant secretly releases harmful substances into the sea
for more than 5 years".
There is also a “testimony” that “nosebleed” came out of “woman diver”.
Korea Net “Isn't it the same as Japan where the nuclear power plant exploded?”


Part 1. “Iigakari” is translated as “false accusation” in English.
The Korean government should not replace the voices of the Korean people
with the Japanese nuclear accident.
In response to this report, a Korean Internet user said,
“The fish caught in the sea is going to the public!
I have some safety awareness. "
“Abandoned radioactive hazardous materials in the ocean as it is? Why can you do that?”
“This is the same as Japan where the nuclear power plant exploded.”
A lot of angry voices have been received.
Also, “I want to live in a safe country.” “Is it okay to eat wakame there?”
“Pandora” (a Korean movie about the nuclear accident) is not a story that is impossible.
“The nuclear power plant should not be built any more.”
There was a voice saying, "You should head to out of nuclear power."

According to NHK news on September 17th,
IAEA = At ​​the annual meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency,
Japan and South Korea responded to the treatment
of water that has been accumulated at the Fukushima Daiichi NPS.
While the Japanese government stated that it “requires rational discussion”,
the Korean side demanded further action from the IAEA,
saying that “the response is not clear and anxiety has been amplified”.

The “water treatment” that continues to accumulate
in the nuclear power plant where the accident occurred is still under discussion in Japan.
There are plans to release it to the ocean,
but there is great opposition from fishermen.
The mayor of Osaka City accepts “contaminated water”
under certain conditions, and says “it is safe” to “release” it into Osaka Bay.
Mr. Koizumi is the Minister of the Environment,
so I think “release to the ocean” is “careful”.
“New Minister Koizumi” also says
What is needed is not how to "protect" the nuclear power plant.
What is necessary is "How to" decommission "the nuclear power plant."

I don't think there can be a new nuclear plant in Japan.
In terms of power generation costs, nuclear power plants have become “high cost”.

On September 17, Korea's “Central Daily” reports.
The United States proposed to South Korea to capture
together the Middle East “Marshall Plan” market,
where 40 nuclear power plants (nuclear power plants) will be built.
The United States strategy to check Russia and China
in the Middle East and South Korea's excellent nuclear technology have had a combined effect.

The Japanese would say “Ahokusa”. “That's absurd”.

Continue to next week.


Part 2. The Tokyo District Prosecutor's Office is “crushing” the crimes
of prosecutors even in violation of the Immigration Control Act.
There are a lot of foreigners (uncountable).
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!
Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.

They have been arrested for "illegal labor"
under Article 70 of the Immigration Act
and have been subjected to "criminal dispositions" such as "a prison term sentence"
and "fine sentence". And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.
I wrote about this yesterday.

The prosecution has arrested a third party for charges
of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is "I and" Kin Gungaku who is Chinese ".
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.
The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
So, as a crime against foreigner's Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor”,
“Sinners supporting other crimes” of “Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code” apply.

The “Sin of Support” against Article 70 “Illegal Labor”
of the Immigration Control Act is stipulated in “Sin Promoting Unlawful Employment”
in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.
Even if you obtain a status of residence with "false documents",
it is not "illegal labor" if you work within the scope of "status of residence".
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in the “Applicable Law”.
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".
If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.

There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate,
so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


The “war time laborers problem” during the war can only be resolved
by the Japan-Korea Convention.
Korea should say unsolved problems.
There are Koreans who have entered Japan for “international students” and “work”.
The Koreans who have been punished for violating the Immigration Law should be rescued.
"Innumerable Koreans" have been sacrificed.
The Korean government should ask the Japanese government
for their “recovery of honor” and “compensation”.

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

Proposal from Japanese September 21, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “MAKE American dream AGAIN!”. Dear Sir, The United States still “gifts” a large amount of dollars every year to China. So now the United States is a poor country. A wall is created between the US and Mexico. Much of the funds will be "expended" from Japanese taxes. The U.S. military-related expenses paid by the Japanese government in FY18 were actually 802.2 billion yen. The American people should know this fact.

Proposal from Japanese

September 21, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition: “MAKE American dream AGAIN!”.

Dear Sir,

The United States still “gifts” a large amount of dollars every year to China. So now the United States is a poor country. A wall is created between the US and Mexico. Much of the funds will be "expended" from Japanese taxes. The U.S. military-related expenses paid by the Japanese government in FY18 were actually 802.2 billion yen. The American people should know this fact.

Part 1. On September 4, Defense Secretary Mark Esper officially diverts $ 3.6 billion (about 380 billion yen) from the ministry's budget to "wall construction costs" along the border with Mexico is.

This is announced as “approved”.

However, it is said that "43 billion yen of that" has been "diverted" from "the construction cost of the hangar" at "the US military base in Japan".

The Japanese government's US military-related expenses in FY2018 have reached a record high of 802.2 billion yen, and its contents are not well understood.

US military restructuring-related expenses are 216.1 billion yen, SACO-related expenses are 5.1 billion yen, US military resident expenses in Japan (so-called compassionate budget) is 196.8 billion yen, other expenses such as base area countermeasure costs, land rental fees, fishery compensation, etc. Is 384.2 billion yen.

Americans will not know the “compassionate budget”.

Quote from "Wikipedia".

In June 1978 (Showa 53), when the Defense Agency Secretary, Shin Kanemaru decided that the Japanese side would pay a part of the salary (6.2 billion yen) of Japanese employees working at the US military base in Japan Begins.

This is a budget that is specially spent for burdens that exceed the framework of the “Japan-US Status Agreement”.

Japan's rapid economic growth is due to the yen's appreciation and the large trade surplus with the United States.

On the other hand, Japan responded to the United States, which faced financial difficulties and was dissatisfied with Japan not placing a military burden on the economy.

This was "requested" by the US for "special measures for the burden on Japan".

This is because “Kanamaru” “introduced” it to the US military as “should be dealt with in a caring position”.

The “Communist Party of Japan” called it a “compassionate budget” and became “propagating” to the general public.

The breakdown of “compassionate budget” includes labor costs for US military base personnel in Japan, utility and water costs within the base, training transfer costs, and facility construction costs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%80%9D%E3%81%84%E3%82%84%E3%82%8A%E4%BA%88%E7%AE%97

Don't be fooled by Trump's “Fake News”.

US forces stationed in Japan are financed by Japanese taxes.

US military leisure expenses are covered by Japanese taxes.

I am worried that Japanese citizens' taxes will be "expended" to more than 10% of the construction cost of the Mexican wall.

If it becomes the Democratic Party administration, the Democratic Party will "hate" Japan.

Latin American countries will also hate Japan.

“Hate” opponents should “hate” US importers and China.

So, I am proposing the construction of a “special zone” to make the US a “rich country”.

Will continue tomorrow

Part 2. In the United States, I “suggest” to build a “special zone” along the border with Mexico.

See April 13, 2019, Special Zone Saturday Edition.

Japan's immigration policy is worse than the United States.

Japanese immigration law is similar to American immigration law.

America's prosperity is realized by the world being free, democratic, and "ruled under the law".

I seriously seek the rule of law. Please instruct the person concerned to investigate.

There are many American victims.

Documents to be submitted to ICC.

http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

*

I agree to disclose my name and necessary information.

Please ask questions by e-mail if you are unsure.

Sincerely, Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano

enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.j

Opinion from Japanese Saturday version, September 21, 2019: Dear Sir, I think many British people want the “rebirth” of the “British Commonwealth”. I think that the “reconstruction” of “EU” will be done by French President Macron. Prime Minister Johnson and President Macron should form a “New National Group” that can compete with the United States in cooperation with the “UK” and “EU”. Then Trump would be “be petrified with terror”.

Opinion from Japanese


Saturday version, September 21, 2019: Dear Sir,
I think many British people want the “rebirth” of the “British Commonwealth”.
I think that the “reconstruction” of “EU” will be done by French President Macron.
Prime Minister Johnson and President Macron should form a “New National Group”
that can compete with the United States in cooperation with the “UK” and “EU”.
Then Trump would be “be petrified with terror”.


Part 1. The Japanese translation
of “Kosi wo Nukasu” is translated as “be petrified with terror”.
According to Reuters on the 16th,
British Prime Minister Johnson reiterated
that he would leave the EU at the end of October even though he would comply
with the laws of the UK but did not agree with (EU).
EU countries should “leave” the UK from the EU at the end of October.
EU countries have more “action items” than “British EU withdrawal” issues.

The British Parliament passed a bill this month to postpone the UK's withdrawal
from the EU. The law was passed by Queen Elizabeth.
The law obligates Prime Minister Johnson
to request the EU to postpone a three-month withdrawal
if the proposed withdrawal agreement with the EU is not approved
by Congress before October 19 .

As I wrote last week, the negative of the trade problem
after the UK leaves the EU is also the EU problem.
“EU” should return to the era of “EEC” or “EC”.
And I think a new “EC” will be born.

I think that the British who chose “Leaving the EU”
in the referendum also have “preparedness” in “independence from the UK”
in Northern Ireland and Scotland.
I think the UK should “reconstruct” the “British Commonwealth” under Queen Elizabeth.
First of all, I think the UK should return to the “Federal Federation”.
After the Second World War, the UK's leadership
in the constituent countries declined as the British economy declined,
and conflicts of interest among the constituent countries became apparent.
I think that the British Commonwealth has
become an “in name only” “existence” due to the 1973 UK membership
of the EC (currently the European Union).
I think many British people want to revive the "British Commonwealth"
(a national group of 53 countries).
I think that the rebirth of “EU” will be done by French President Macron.
President Macron is to make former colonies such as France and the Netherlands members
of the "Extended EU".
Prime Minister Johnson and President Macron should form a large “New National Group”
that can compete with the United States in cooperation with the “UK” and “EU”.
In order for the “New National Group” to have “power”
in the international community,
it needs to have an economy that is larger than the United States and China in terms of GDP.
Then Trump would be “be petrified with terror”.
If that happens Xi Jinping president also it would "be petrified with terror".
To that end, a “special zone” should be created and “refugees”
and “immigrants” should be actively accepted.
To that end, I am saying in a special zone, the Sunday edition,
"Europe should be re-emerged as" the king of the world "again."

It will continue tomorrow.


Part 2. Many Koreans have been arrested for violating international law
and immigration laws.
(I can't count).
Korean, Chinese, Philippine, `` Everyone '' from all over the world!
Relieve the victims of the Japanese government around you!

Victims are foreigners who “work illegally”
in activities other than “resident status” in Japan.
They were arrested for "illegal labor" under Article 70 of the Immigration Act,
Received "criminal disposition" such as "fine penalty".
And it is a foreigner who was forced to return.

A third party has been arrested
on charges of "supporting" the above-mentioned "illegal labor" of foreigners.
The victim is me and “Kin Gungaku who is Chinese”.
Other victims include Filipino embassy officials and Philippine diplomats.
I think there are more victims, but I don't know the information.

The person who gave the "employment contract document" to a foreigner
who did "illegal labor" is a third party.
It has nothing to do with “illegal labor”.
Prosecutors say “Indictment” as follows:

I handed a "employment contract document with false contents" to a foreigner.
Foreigners were easily able to obtain a “residence status”
by attaching an “employment contract document with a false content”.
Foreigners came to Japan because they were able to obtain a “resident status”.
Foreigners were in Japan and were able to do “illegal labor”.
Therefore, as a crime against foreigner immigration law Article 70 "illegal labor"
"Crime that supported other crimes" in "Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code" applies.

Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Labor” is “sin of support”
It is stipulated in “Sin that promotes illegal employment”.

The prosecution's “reason for crime” is stipulated
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 “Restoration of Status of Residence
by Submitting False Documents”.
There is no punishment. “Resident status” is simply revoked.
And it will be “forced return”.

Even if you get a status of residence with "false documents",
If you work within the scope of your status of residence, it is not “illegal labor”.
The application of Article 62 or Article 62 of the Penal Code to me
or the Philippine diplomat is an error in the “Applicable Law”.
This is a perfect "False charge".

Victims should apply to the government or media of their country.
Governments and media in each country should ask the Japanese government
for "recovery of honor" and "compensation".

If national governments or embassies cannot protest the Japanese government,
please request an investigation from ICC.
There are many victims all over the world. Please support “sue to ICC”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

The above translation document is inaccurate,
so please contact us by email.

There are many American victims. I have seen it with this eye.
Americans are also not guilty if the prosecution does not arrest the employer.
Should claim the restoration and compensation of American honor.

Sincerely, Yashiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/POTD-July-10-1200x800.jpg

For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp


http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

help me Opinion Au guide suprême Kim Jong Un, guide suprême de la République populaire démocratique de Corée. 2019-09-20: Monsieur, Le matériel de mon procès sera remis à la prison.

Au guide suprême Kim Jong Un, guide suprême de la République populaire démocratique de Corée.


2019-09-20: Monsieur,
Le matériel de mon procès sera remis à la prison.
Plusieurs agents pénitentiaires remarquent mon "erreur" de "loi applicable" en consultant mes enregistrements de procès.
Je suis innocent Ce qu'un agent pénitentiaire peut faire, c'est "me faire libérer" dès que possible.
“Le juge de l'arbitre d'origine” qui a peur de ma “libération conditionnelle” n'autorisera pas la “libération conditionnelle”.
Le gardien de prison m'a dit "N'oublie pas ça".
Je ferai du Japon un «pays soumis à la loi».


Partie 1 La police et les procureurs ne connaissent pas la loi pour le grand public et les Philippins,
Ils "abusent" de cela.

La police et les procureurs ont utilisé les personnes suivantes pour remplacer «Helper» à l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
La police et les procureurs ont désigné l'article 24-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration "Helper" dans l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Dans le cas de l'ambassade des Philippines
Ils ont été éliminés dans une relation de cause à effet complètement différente de celle de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration pour le «travail illégal».

Trois Philippins ont été éliminés en vertu de l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Délits du travail illégal».
“Partisan” à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration, qui n'est pas lié à l'article 70
Dispose comme «partisan» de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Le motif du crime était "de" fournir "de" faux faux documents "à" des Philippines qui avaient violé l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration ".
Mais ce n'est pas un crime.
La cession est une "cession administrative" du ministre de la Justice.
Il s’agit d’une «annulation du statut de résidence» et d’une «déportation forcée».
*
Trois Philippins obtiennent un "faux contrat de travail"
Le personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines (chauffeur) serait «acquis»
(Plus tard, deux membres du personnel de l’ambassade et des diplomates seront envoyés).
S'ils sont tous deux criminels, ils ont un impact considérable sur la société
Je pensais que «l'action méritoire» était grande.


Le crime commis par le policier avait pour but d'abuser du but de «l'annulation du statut de résident» établi en 2004.

Il s’agit d’une violation de la Loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration (activité non qualifiée) en 2010;
Quatre criminels chinois accusés de "travail illégal".
Et pour le soutien de la loi sur l'immigration 22-4- (4), il a été qualifié de crime de soutien en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
“Moi et le Chinois Kin Gungaku”.
Le cas de l'ambassade des Philippines est exactement le même que celui de 2010.

Les victimes se "propagent" parce qu'elles n'arrêtent pas les procureurs et les juges de police.

La communauté internationale doit mettre fin aux «violations des droits de l'homme» commises par le Japon.
Le «traité sur les droits de l'homme» stipule que des sanctions non fondées sur les lois fondamentales de chaque pays constituent une violation.
Continuez jusqu'à la semaine prochaine.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".


Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "soutien de l'article 22-4-4 loi sur l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


S'il vous plaît demander au chef suprême, Kim Jong Un, *****************************************


Le gouvernement japonais a déclaré que les «os» de «Megumi Yokota» sont des faux.
Parce que cet «os» est un faux, je ne peux faire confiance à rien de ce que dit la Corée du Nord.
C'est pourquoi j'insiste pour rendre "l'abducté".
Cependant, le magazine scientifique britannique «Nature» soulève des questions sur les tests ADN.
Aujourd'hui, l'ONU et le président Donald Trump sont des alliés du gouvernement japonais.
La Corée du Nord devrait réfuter sur la question de la «nature».
Suivez les informations ci-dessous.
http://www.kit.hi-ho.ne.jp/msatou/05-02/050226izu-nature.htm


Le gouvernement nord-coréen devrait «protester» contre le gouvernement japonais.
«Le gouvernement japonais devrait enlever les étrangers» devrait être «résolu».
Il y a beaucoup de «victimes» du «même groupe ethnique» et du «sud-coréen».
Protestez le gouvernement japonais au nom du `` peuple de la péninsule coréenne ''!
La faiblesse de l'administration Abe est "la violation du droit de l'immigration".
«Affaire» de preuve que le Japon n'est pas régi par la loi.

Veuillez rendre publique la fausse représentation de la «loi sur l'immigration» du gouvernement japonais.
S'il vous plaît annoncer ces choses et condamner le gouvernement japonais pour l'élection de juillet à la Chambre des conseillers.
L'administration Abe est frustrée.
Si le gouvernement Abe s'effondre, le prochain gouvernement sera obéissant à la Corée du Nord.

La Corée du Nord devrait annoncer que le gouvernement japonais a "illégalement enlevé et arrêté" des étrangers.
La Corée du Nord devrait "publier" qu'il y a plus de "victimes étrangères" que de "ravisseurs japonais".
La Corée du Nord devrait faire des médias du monde un «ami» de la Corée du Nord.
Le gouvernement nord-coréen devrait le rendre public dans les médias étrangers et aux Nations Unies.
Le gouvernement nord-coréen devrait divulguer "mon nom" spécifiquement. Approuver


Mes informations *** ****

Code postal 2610-0003
Adresse Mihamaku Chiba-City Japon
Nom Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano
Téléphone portable
Courriel


S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

help me Opinion To President Trump 2019-09-20: Dear Sir, My trial materials will be given to the prison. Multiple prison officers notice my "applicable law" "error" by looking at my trial records. I am innocent.

To President Trump


2019-09-20: Dear Sir,
My trial materials will be given to the prison.
Multiple prison officers notice my "applicable law" "error"
by looking at my trial records. I am innocent.
What a prison officer can do is "get me released" as soon as possible.
“Judge of the original referee” who is afraid of my “parole” will not allow “parole”.
The prison officer told me "Don't forget this".
I will make Japan a “country governed under the law”.


Part 1. The police and prosecutors "abuse" this because the general public
and Filipinos are not familiar with the law.

The police and prosecutors applied the following persons as substitutes
for “Helper” in Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Act.
Police and public prosecutors have designated "Helper"
in the Immigration Act Article 22-4-4 as "Helper" in the Immigration Act Article 70.

In the case of the Embassy of the Philippines,
it was disposed of in a causal relationship completely different
from the purpose of the immigration law for “illegal labor”.

Three Filipinos were disposed of under Immigration Act Article 70 “Illegal Work Crimes”.
The “supporter” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act,
which has nothing to do with the Immigration Act Article 70,
has been disposed of as the “supporter” in Article 70 of the Immigration Act.

The reason for the crime was "providing" "false fake documents" to "Philippines
who violated Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act".
But this is not a crime.
The disposal is an “administrative disposal” by the Minister of Justice.
They are “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced deportation”.
*
The person whom three Filipinos “acquired” a “false fake employment contract”
is a Philippine embassy employee (driver) (later two embassy staff members
and a diplomat will be additionally sent).
They thought that “meritorious deed” would be great because making
both of them criminals would have a great impact on society.


The purpose of the police officer's crime was to abuse the purpose
of “cancellation of status of residence” established in 2004.

This case is four Chinese offenders who were violated the Immigration Act
in 2010 (non-qualified activities) and were accused of Article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
And "I and the Chinese Kin Gungaku", which was regarded as a crime
under the support of Article 70 of the Immigration Act
for the reasons of support of the Immigration Act 22-4- (4).
The Philippine Embassy case is exactly the same as the 2010 case.

Victims "spread" because they do not arrest prosecutors and police judges.

The international community should stop Japan's “human rights violations”.
The “human rights treaty” states that punishment that is not based
on the basic laws of each country is a violation.
Continue to next week.

Please see "Bill of indictment" at the following "Site".
In this case, just by looking at this “bill of indictment”,
you can understand the “error of applicable law”.

Please see “English translation” and “Japanese text” PDFs.
Please be careful when handling personal information.
● Translation of English sentence “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
English translation is for reference only. To be precise, do it yourself.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Original Japanese text “letter of indictment”
"Indictment against Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (Japanese)"
English translation is incorrect. Please see “PDF” above for English translation.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● Please see related laws. (Japanese and English translation)
1) Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) Criminal law
Penal code
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution of Japan
The Constitution of Japan
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Part 2. I “sue” two things.
This is an “international” “human rights violation” by the Japanese government.
It has been nearly 10 years since the incident. My life is limited.
We ask for your support so that our “honor recovery and compensation” will be carried out.
If the world ignores “governance under the law”,
it is natural to resolve it by terrorism. But crazy.

1. Foreigners performed “illegal labor” other than “qualification of residence”.
But foreigners are innocent.
Only foreigners were punished for the immigration law article 70 “Illegal Labor Crimes”.
On the other hand, the Immigration Control Law punishes employers
who are “causal” of illegal labor under Article 73-2 of the Immigration Control Law
 (crimes that promote illegal employment).

However, the Japanese judiciary “punished” foreigners only, but not “employers”.
This is clearly contrary to the principle of equality under the law
And it violates international law that prohibits "arbitrarily" "punishing" only foreigners.

If an employer who hires a foreigner illegally is "innocent",
an illegally employed foreigner is also "innocent".
If so, there is no “person who supported other crimes of the Penal Code”
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act.
"I, KinGungaku, Philippine diplomat, Philippine embassy official" is innocent.

2. The prosecution is “applying” the “crimes to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code
against Article 70 of the Immigration Control Act on the grounds
of “support of the Immigration Act 22-4-4” It ’s crazy.
This is out of logic in the law.

A foreigner acted as prescribed in Article 22-4-4
(Acquisition of status of residence by submitting false documents).
However, there is no “criminal punishment” for this.
Disposal is “cancellation of status of residence” and “forced relocation”
by the Minister of Justice.
Therefore, the “crime to support other crimes”
in Articles 60 and 62 of the Penal Code is not applicable.
The “reason for crime” in Article 22-4-4 of the Immigration Act pointed out
by the “indictment” has no causal relationship with Article 70 of the Immigration Act.
The logic of the law is completely crazy.

The Japanese government has "crush" "sue".
However, “crush” by state power is “stop” of “Statute of limitations”.

The materials are below.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

There are many victims in the world.

Best regards. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


My information ********



Name Yasuhiro Nagano Yasuhiro Nagano




For uncertainties, please contact us!
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp

********

help me Opinion Emmanuel Macron au président français 2019-09-20: Monsieur, Le matériel de mon procès sera remis à la prison. Plusieurs agents pénitentiaires remarquent mon "erreur" de "loi applicable" en consultant mes enregistrements de procès.

Emmanuel Macron au président français


2019-09-20: Monsieur,
Le matériel de mon procès sera remis à la prison.
Plusieurs agents pénitentiaires remarquent mon "erreur" de "loi applicable" en consultant mes enregistrements de procès.
Je suis innocent Ce qu'un agent pénitentiaire peut faire, c'est "me faire libérer" dès que possible.
“Le juge de l'arbitre d'origine” qui a peur de ma “libération conditionnelle” n'autorisera pas la “libération conditionnelle”.
Le gardien de prison m'a dit "N'oublie pas ça".
Je ferai du Japon un «pays soumis à la loi».


Partie 1 La police et les procureurs ne connaissent pas la loi pour le grand public et les Philippins,
Ils "abusent" de cela.

La police et les procureurs ont utilisé les personnes suivantes pour remplacer «Helper» à l'article 73-2 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.
La police et les procureurs ont désigné l'article 24-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration "Helper" dans l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.

Dans le cas de l'ambassade des Philippines
Ils ont été éliminés dans une relation de cause à effet complètement différente de celle de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration pour le «travail illégal».

Trois Philippins ont été éliminés en vertu de l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Délits du travail illégal».
“Partisan” à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration, qui n'est pas lié à l'article 70
Dispose comme «partisan» de l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration.

Le motif du crime était "de" fournir "de" faux faux documents "à" des Philippines qui avaient violé l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration ".
Mais ce n'est pas un crime.
La cession est une "cession administrative" du ministre de la Justice.
Il s’agit d’une «annulation du statut de résidence» et d’une «déportation forcée».
*
Trois Philippins obtiennent un "faux contrat de travail"
Le personnel de l'ambassade des Philippines (chauffeur) serait «acquis»
(Plus tard, deux membres du personnel de l’ambassade et des diplomates seront envoyés).
S'ils sont tous deux criminels, ils ont un impact considérable sur la société
Je pensais que «l'action méritoire» était grande.


Le crime commis par le policier avait pour but d'abuser du but de «l'annulation du statut de résident» établi en 2004.

Il s’agit d’une violation de la Loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration (activité non qualifiée) en 2010;
Quatre criminels chinois accusés de "travail illégal".
Et pour le soutien de la loi sur l'immigration 22-4- (4), il a été qualifié de crime de soutien en vertu de l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration
“Moi et le Chinois Kin Gungaku”.
Le cas de l'ambassade des Philippines est exactement le même que celui de 2010.

Les victimes se "propagent" parce qu'elles n'arrêtent pas les procureurs et les juges de police.

La communauté internationale doit mettre fin aux «violations des droits de l'homme» commises par le Japon.
Le «traité sur les droits de l'homme» stipule que des sanctions non fondées sur les lois fondamentales de chaque pays constituent une violation.
Continuez jusqu'à la semaine prochaine.

Veuillez consulter "Acte d'accusation" sur le "Site" suivant.
Dans ce cas, il suffit de regarder ce "acte d'accusation"
Vous pouvez comprendre les "erreurs de droit applicable".


Veuillez consulter les PDF «Traduction en anglais» et «Texte en japonais».
S'il vous plaît soyez prudent lorsque vous manipulez des informations personnelles.
● Traduction de la phrase anglaise «letter of incictment»
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku"
La traduction anglaise est pour référence seulement. Pour être précis, faites-le vous-même.
http://www.miraico.jp/crime/g5-Indictment-against-Nagano-Kin.pdf
● Texte japonais original "lettre d'accusation"
"Acte d'accusation contre Yasuhiro Nagano KinGungaku (japonais)"
La traduction anglaise est incorrecte. Veuillez consulter «PDF» ci-dessus pour la traduction en anglais.
http://www.miraico.jp/ICC-crime/2Related%20Documents/%EF%BC%91Indictment.pdf
● S'il vous plaît voir les lois connexes. (Traduction en japonais et en anglais)
1) Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
Loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration et la reconnaissance du statut de réfugié
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3039&vm=&re=
2) droit pénal
Code pénal
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=3130&vm=&re=
3) Constitution du Japon
La constitution du japon
http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=174


Partie 2 Je «poursuis» deux choses.
Il s'agit d'une «violation des droits de l'homme» «internationale» commise par le gouvernement japonais.
Près de 10 ans se sont écoulés depuis l'incident. Ma vie est limitée.
Nous sollicitons votre soutien afin que notre «recouvrement d’honneur et indemnisation» soit réalisée.
Si le monde ignore la «gouvernance sous la loi», il est naturel de la résoudre par le terrorisme. Mais fou.

1 Les étrangers effectuaient un «travail illégal» autre que «la qualification de résidence». Mais les étrangers sont innocents.
Seuls les étrangers ont été sanctionnés pour l’article 70 de la loi sur l’immigration «Crimes de travail illégaux».
En revanche, la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration désigne les employeurs «causaux» de travail illégal à l'article 73-2.
Nous sommes punis par (péché qui a favorisé l'emploi illégal).

Cependant, la justice japonaise n'a «puni» que les étrangers, mais pas les «employeurs».
Ceci est clairement contraire au principe d'égalité devant la loi
Et cela viole le droit international qui interdit de "punir" uniquement les étrangers "de manière arbitraire".

Si un employeur qui embauche illégalement un étranger est "innocent", un étranger employé illégalement est également "innocent".
Dans l’affirmative, il n’existe aucune «personne qui a soutenu d’autres crimes du Code pénal» contre l’article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l’immigration.
"Moi, KinGungaku, diplomate philippin, représentant de l'ambassade des Philippines", je suis innocent.

2 La poursuite est parce que "soutien de l'article 22-4-4 loi sur l'immigration"
Articles 60 et 62 du code pénal contre l'article 70 de la loi sur le contrôle de l'immigration
C'est "fou" d '"appliquer" "un péché qui soutient d'autres crimes".
C'est hors de logique dans la loi.

Loi sur l'immigration des étrangers, article 22-4-4
L’acte prescrit dans (Acquisition du statut de résidence par la présentation de faux documents) a été accompli.
Cependant, il n'y a pas de «sanction pénale» pour cela.
La disposition est «annulation du statut de résidence» et «réinstallation forcée» par le ministre de la Justice.
Par conséquent, le «crime pour soutenir d'autres crimes» aux articles 60 et 62 du Code pénal n'est pas applicable.
Le «motif du crime» énoncé à l'article 22-4-4 de la loi sur l'immigration énoncé dans «l'acte d'accusation» n'a aucun lien de causalité avec l'article 70 de la loi sur l'immigration.
La logique du droit est complètement folle.

Le gouvernement japonais a "écraser" "poursuivre".
Toutefois, le «béguinage» par le pouvoir de l’État est un «arrêt» de «délai de prescription».

Les matériaux sont ci-dessous.
http://www.miraico.jp/Bridgetohumanrights/

Il y a beaucoup de victimes dans le monde.

Cordialement. Yasuhiro Nagano

Yasuhiro Nagano


Postscript:
Il y a beaucoup de victimes américaines. Je l'ai vu de cet œil.
Les Américains sont également non coupables si la poursuite n'arrête pas l'employeur.
Le gouvernement américain devrait réclamer la restauration et l’indemnisation de l’honneur américain.
S'il vous plaît soutenir "poursuivre" à "CPI".


Il est publié dans le blog suivant.
https://toworldmedia.blogspot.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenadiary.jp/
http://oyazimirai.hatenablog.com/
http://britishprimeminister.seesaa.net/


Yasuhiro Nagano

S'il vous plaît aidez-moi.
S'il vous plaît contactez-nous pour toutes questions.
enzai_mirai@yahoo.co.jp